Swiss Cheese, Donuts, and Elephants. OH MY!

How does any recap of Kathleen Kane's 2014 not mention the two secret court orders from unidentified judges in unidentified courts which prevent her from investigations and prosecutions AND PREVENT HER FROM DISCUSSING IT?

The American News Media fails to explain the holes in their reporting. [Insert Swiss cheese or Donut metaphor here]

While surviving the constant litigation of Healy v Healy and Healy v Miller, it became obvious that the issue being ignored and neglected was distracting from that HUGE elephant in the room.

It became UNDENIABLE.... it was the non-disclosure pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information which was undermining the law, undermining justice, undermining the Constitution... AND LEGAL PROFESSIONALS WERE NOT PERMITTED TO POINT IT OUT... and prevented from any actions which addressed it.

How do you point out the corruption caused by a law, when the very law itself prevents it from being exposed?

How did this unconstitutional, unethical and immoral LAW find it's way into the ethics standards for lawyers in EVERY state?

An unethical ethics standard mandates fraud in the furtherance of fraud without any allowance for rectifying it. A complete disregard for the rights of the victim, who becomes further victimized without any opportunity for relief. (What if they never stop the 'furtherances'?)

Surely, 50 state legislatures and governors would have noticed. BUT, The American Bar Association provided their 'Ethics' Rules to each state supreme court to enact into LAW.

No construction by a legislature.
No constitutional review.
No signature of a governor.
No ability for the court to reverse - it would expose their corruption... adverse judicial affects violate Rule 1.6

EVERY LAWYER, JUDGE AND LEGAL PROFESSIONAL MANDATED TO IGNORE... and they all did.

With only themselves to regulate and discipline the profession, the extreme failure of their deliberate lapse in ethics was concealed, non-disclosed and kept confidential for decades. Many simply accepted and never questioned the injustice and corruption - even when wrapped in constitutional violations and fraud. They knew it was wrong. They did nothing.
Note to Lawyers: THAT'S NOT SELF-POLICING. It's called conspiracy when you cover up the crimes of others. Awards from the bar associations for your 'efforts' quickly begin to resemble kickbacks when compiled on a resume.

INJUSTICE, JUDICIAL CORRUPTION, FRAUD UPON THE COURT, Manipulation of the media to divide people, prevent information and prevent exposure of the needle in the haystack of US Injustice. Look at EVERY story of injustice in the US and you can see the effect of Rule 1.6 - there's a lawyer who is concealing the truthful information while presenting disinformation and misinformation... because Rule 1.6 allows and endorses their fraud in the furtherance of injustice.

The fix is simple. Prepare for a shameful mea culpa from the state and federal judiciary for their egregious violations and rape of the public trust. Once Rule 1.6 is removed. Everything else works still. Rule 1.6 was the problem which undermined every reform or attempt to 'correct' the problems with the judiciary and the courts.

American judges are not known for deftness and speed when addressing their irresponsible actions. Shamelessly, they have known for years that the Rule 1.6 problem was very exposed. They tried to hide it. They persist in using further injustice to conceal their injustice... because Rule 1.6 allows and endorses their fraud in the furtherance of fraud.

The only possible issue which Kathleen Kane could be addressing in that CNN interview... Every statement clearly points to Rule 1.6 issues. Once you know what it is, and how big the problem,

Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane received court orders from unidentified courts and unidentified judges for unidentified reasons. About the Orders, she said the following:
– “We are not investigating. I cannot investigate.”
– “I am being stopped from performing my duties as Attorney General.”
– “My office is being stopped from certain investigations.”
– “And we are being stopped even from telling why.”
– “My hands are tied and this will be frustrating for you because it is just as frustrating for me.”
– “My hands are tied because there are court orders which don’t allow us to say certain things which I believe the public needs to know.”
– “I knew that I was walking into public corruption. Which again is why I ran.”
– “But I will tell you this. Even I am shocked at the level of public corruption.”
– “I am shocked at how deep it goes.
I am shocked at how powerful it is.
I have never seen anything like this. It’s breathtaking.
It has been described by the people familiar with what is happening as shameful.”
– “But, if this can be done to me as Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer of the 5th largest state in the country, i am sickened to think what can and may be done to regular, good people who don’t have the resources that I have to challenge it.”

When you consider that Governor Tom Corbett has been Attorney General or Governor for the last decade, and most everyone who accuses Kathleen Kane of 'silence' has something to be exposed once the veil is lifted...

Occam's Razor applies and explains... It's Rule 1.6

Except Daryl Metcalfe - who seems to be EXTREMELY CONCERNED that some man is gonna pop the question.

Would someone please prepare a Petition for the signature of every gay man in the Commonwealth where they promise NOT TO MARRY DARYL METCALFE.

Maybe then Daryl can relax his sphincter. ( [Takei voice] OH MY, that could be problematic too, I suppose.)

Team Corbett continues attacks on the 'silenced' AG Kane

Tom Corbett, Frank Fina, Seth Williams, Bob Brady, Dave Heckler, Stewart Greenleaf, Bruce Castor, Risa Ferman, Tom Carluccio...

Pointing LOUDLY to one investigation with political suggestions, yet neglecting to address an investigation with two secret court orders from two secret judges in two secret courts.

Why does Team Corbett keep pointing to the 'low hanging fruit'? A distraction from the unprecedented - TWO SECRET COURT ORDERS WHICH PREVENT ACTION, EXPOSURE, INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION. What is that all about???

District Attorneys Heckler & Williams have ignored the well-documented crimes and constitutional violations of the courthouse staff.

Questioning the discretion of the Attorney General in spite of the corruption being concealed by court orders. Those who are not discussing the secret court orders are logically the people responsible for requesting the corrupt judicial actions.

Team Corbett is clearly focused on keeping "everything Sandusky' out of the public domain - if they lose Rule 1.6 Confidentiality then the public will learn EVERYTHING. The Unconstitutional affect of Rule 1.6 is proven in those criminal reports of violation of PA law and the US constitution. If they cannot conceal injustice and corruption under Rule 1.6, they will likely be joining Jerry Sandusky and wearing orange Team Corbett jumpsuits.

Every corrupt action to ignore the unconstitutional law - called Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information - is ONLY protected until the unconstitutional is acknowledged. It is proven in those lapsed investigations in the Philadelphia and Bucks County District Attorney's Offices. The complaint filed in both counties and federally with US Attorney Zane Memeger. An additional investigation was requested by the U.S. Postal Inspectors as the Central Legal Staff of the court used the mail in their fraud and forgery.

Attorney General Kathleen Kane has been court ordered NOT TO INVESTIGATE.

Governor Elect Tom Wolf, Shut Down The Montgomery County Courthouse.

“But I will tell you this. Even I am shocked at the level of public corruption.”
I am shocked at how deep it goes.
I am shocked at how powerful it is.
I have never seen anything like this. It’s breathtaking.
It has been described by the people familiar with what is happening as shameful.”

“But, if this can be done to me as Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer of the 5th largest state in the country, i am sickened to think what can and may be done to regular, good people who don;t have the resources that I have to challenge it.”

- Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane on two court ordered mandates from unidentified judges and unidentified courts.

Mr. ______, Shut down this courthouse.

Who will be the one to end the abomination of injustice and corruption perpetuated by the criminals on the Montgomery County Judiciary?

Gov. Tom Corbett - YOU FAILED. YOU IGNORED IT. YOU PARTICIPATED. YOU ENDORSED. No wonder you shuddered on the day Terance Healy introduced himself to you in Doylestown.

Attorney General Eric Holder - The United States Attorney General is the only lawyer in the country permitted to take action by law. Why are you taking so long? People are being killed because of the criminal actions of an entire judiciary.

Governor elect Tom Wolf - A non-lawyer who can lawfully take action to end a terrorist regime in the second largest county in Pennsylvania. Act now before they make it illegal for you to address the issue.

Governor Wolf... Shut Down this Courthouse!

Assemble the Pennsylvania Legislature... Suspend Rule 1.6 and arrest and prosecute the monsters who terrorize this county and bring shame upon the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Thank the lawyers in the Legislature for their service and accept their resignations. Sen. Stewart Greenleaf and Rep. Todd Stephens should be at the front of the line... followed by the Judiciary Committees who ignored the issue... and then every lawyer in the Senate and Legislature. They have all participated in 'the worst kept secret in Pennsylvania'.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Chief Justice Ron Castille can expose the Judges and Judiciary who prevented the Pennsylvania Attorney General from performing the responsibilities of the Office of Attorney General by issuing 'secret' orders to promote corruption and perversions of justice in violation of law, the Pennsylvania Constitution and the Constitution of the United States of America.

When you stop payment of the pensions to the corrupt, and seize the property obtained using their ill-gotten gains, you'll find the money to pay for that shortfall in the budget.

Proclaim JUSTICE throughout All the Land
Unto All the Inhabitants thereof.

... Don't be distracted by the petty stories of naughty emails and the infighting from those bullies already evicted from the AG's office. Friends of the last AG who ignored the massive corruption for years...

Interest in this letter?

There seems to be an increased interest in this letter from around the web.

Letter to District Attorney Risa Ferman

The DA ignored it completely. A clear demonstration of no protection of the law.

The judges neglected and failed to enforce my wife to comply with ANY court order. Usually where compliance would reveal her private telephone, the private investigator, the surveillance software company, provide medical benefits, permit me to see my children.

The alternative was aggressive enforcement of EVERY court order, where I proved the fraud of Angst & Angst each time. They would lie about statements on court orders and then attempt to enforce their fiction.

Their intrusive technology was detected and reported and recorded... BUT there was no way to end the terror. It still continues to affect my devices and those of my friends.

There were indications that the page had been hacked and was not being displayed. Hopefully I have corrected the issue.

The May 2009 letter had a wide distribution. I never imagined I would still be battling these idiots for the remainder of my life.

cc:
CNN – NEWDESK, One CNN Center, Atlanta, GA 30303
ABC News, 7 West 66th Street, New York, NY 10023
NBC News, 30 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, N.Y. 10112
CBS Television, 51 West 52nd Street, New York, NY 10019

WPVI-TV/DT – NEWSDESK, 4100 City Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19131
NBC-10 News Line, 10 Monument Rd, Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004
CBS 3 – NEWSDESK, 1555 Hamilton Street, Philadelphia, PA 19130
FOX 29 – NEWSDESK, 330 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106
CW Philly 57-WPSG-TV – NEWSDESK, 1555 Hamilton St, Philadelphia, PA 19130
KYW Newsradio 1060: News Department, 400 Market St, Philadelphia, PA 19106

The Inquirer – NEWSDESK, 400 N. Broad St., Philadelphia, PA 19130
Daily News – NEWS DESK, 400 N. Broad St., Philadelphia, PA 19130
Intelligencer, 333 N Broad St, Doylestown, PA 18901
Reporter, 307 Derstine Ave, Lansdale, PA 19446
The Times Herald, 410 Markley St, Norristown, PA 19401

Governor Edward G. Rendell
225 Main Capitol Building
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120

Tom Corbett
Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General
16th Floor, Strawberry Square
Harrisburg, PA 17120

Hon. Kate Harper
1515 Dekalb Pike Suite 106
Blue Bell, PA 19422

Hon. Rick Taylor
701 Horsham Road
Suite 101
Horsham, PA 19044

Stewart J. Greenleaf
Senate District 12
711 York Road
Willow Grove, PA 19090

Allyson Y. Schwartz
U.S. Representative
706 West Avenue
Jenkintown, PA 19046

Robert P. Casey, Jr.
393 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Arlen Specter
711 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

President Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Come On, Kathleen - Rule 1.6'd again?

Seems every time that Kathleen Kane is in the news she is being baited by politicians who know she must conceal crimes committed by her clients - they include the Governor, her staff - and former staff members, various state agencies, etc.

Rule 1.6 of The Rules of Professional Conduct improperly and unconstitutionally enacted by the state Supreme court is the noose which Kathleen Kane wears as an accessory every time she goes into the public eye. She's not permitted to discuss her clients crimes.

Rule 1.6 is Confidentiality of Information – an aggressively enforced mandate of silence where the information
– would affect the integrity of the judiciary,
– would reveal the misconduct of their own office,
– would expose individual liability,
– would adversely affect any client.

Kathleen Kane wears the albatross of Rule 1.6 like Oscar night jewelry... and no one notices. Kathleen Kane knows the law. Kathleen Kane won't fall into their trap. Joan Rivers wouldn't have hesitated to ask Kathleen Kane "Who's shame she is wearing."



Has Kathleen Kane finally found a way that her clients have authorized a 'release'... of their Confidential Information?

AG Kane reveals X-rated emails

Corbett, Castille press for names, details on porn e-mails

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION/REVIEW OF PER CURIAM ACTION

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia Office

Terance Healy	: NO: 900 EDA 2014
	:
V.	:
	:
David R. Miller	:
Jennifer K. Miller	:
	:

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION/REVIEW OF PER CURIAM ACTION


Regarding the Per Curiam Order attached.

The caption is INCORRECT.

The decision is UNEXPLAINED.

The per curiam order is UNSIGNED.

The per curiam order is UNDATED.

The motion was UNCONTESTED.

Please identify the judge, the motions panel, and/or the member(s) of the Central Legal Staff involved in the careless preparation of the document.

Attached are copies of the following Superior Court Of Pennsylvania which demonstrate the previous decisions of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania with regard to procedurally defective orders where the court lacked jurisdiction.

J-A01019-14	Kozel v. Kozel	#461 WDA 2013
J-A27027-13	Wagner v. Wagner	#235 MDA 2013
J-S17007-13	Hauck v. Hauck	#1984 WDA 2011
J-A02029-13	Reece v. Reece	#987 WDA 2012
J-S21041/08	Danz v. Danz	#1506 WDA 2007
J-A14035/09	Bingaman v Bingaman	#1644 MDA 2008
J-A30006/02	Lazaric v. Lazaric	#263 EDA 2002

The evidence is clear. The law is clear. The precedents are well established.

Every action of the courts demonstrate the efforts to obstruct, misinform and misdirect somehow made ‘lawful’ by Rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct causing the denial of life and liberty and terrorizing every aspect of life.

Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio issued a deliberately defective and void order. The court record indicates that she clearly lacked jurisdiction. The court record demonstrates the obstruction of the appeal filed on August 15, 2011.

There is no escape for the litigant. The court is mandated to terrorize and destroy the litigant ‘to protect the integrity of the courts.’ pursuant to Rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

A deliberate, intentional and malicious court order issued by Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio without jurisdiction has terrorized the litigant from the day it was issued. An action done without jurisdiction to conceal the actions of fifteen prior judges in the matter which have attacked their victim since 2007.

The County & Court then went to work to obstruct and deny the appeal of that order issuing further void orders based on the defective and void orders. Those who enforced the defective and void orders becoming involved in criminal acts for doing so. The mandate for protecting integrity of those without integrity growing exponentially.

The Court personnel and all lawyers are mandated to obstruct and deny the victim ‘to protect the integrity of the court’. In doing so, they become involved in the obstruction of justice.

Each court believing the litigant is causing their involvement in this crime. Not the ‘judge’ acting without jurisdiction… not the Courts which mandated their participation in the denial of justice. Each ignoring the law and the US Constitution in the process of self-preservation and sacrifice of their own judicial integrity.

The Appellant is being denied Life, Liberty and equal protection under the law. He is experiencing the complete loss of rights and privileges protected by the Constitution of the United States, and the Pennsylvania Constitution.

The inability to accomplish anything with regard to the Appeal is caused by the courts, enabled by the court, endorsed by the courts, made ‘lawful’ by the courts as everyone involved in the denial of constitutionally protected rights is mandated to conceal the corruption, injustice and lack of jurisdiction of the court.

The victim can do nothing to escape the game of “The order is not void until we say it’s void’. There have been over 80 attempts to have the court take the lawful action to void the order. Every attempt has been ignored.

The Superior Courts are mandated to obstruct and deny the victim ‘to protect the integrity of the court’. In doing so they became involved in the obstruction of justice. Their knowledge of the void and defective orders mandated that they address the issue. A mandatory action, not a discretionary issue for the court.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court is mandated to do the same. The Supreme Court enacted the law and in doing so must follow it. This prevents the Supreme Court from repealing the law or addressing the injustice.

And so it goes, that every effort to prevent any interaction with the judiciary is the primary focus. It is essential to ‘protect the integrity of the judiciary’. The denial of justice to the litigant is a consequence. The continued peril and jeopardy of the victim is not a concern.

The chaos injected by the letter dated August 8, 2014 and the improperly captioned, unexplained, unsigned, undated decision to the uncontested motion.

The Montgomery County Court has neglected to provide the full court record to the Superior Court and has obstructed efforts to produce the documents and transcripts to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

This Court has been notified of the litigation in the Federal Courts which is now before the United States Congress and the President to provide the only escape from the nightmare created when the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, and EVERY state supreme court, enacted the Rules of Professional Conduct into law without ANY constitutional review, construction by a legislature or signature of any governor. Copies of notices attached.

I respectfully request review of this matter based on the fact that Rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct results in the absolute denial of right and liberties protected by the United States Constitution and that the supporting staff of this Court cease from unexplained and unsubstantiated actions to obstruct, prevent and deny justice in this matter.

AN ORAL ARGUMENT ON THIS MOTION IS DEMANDED

Respectfully,



Terance Healy


NB: The game of the Prothonotary deliberately improperly captioning the matter is obvious and tiresome. Please correct all records and documents accordingly.

The matter has left the appellant homeless and destitute and forced to respond to the Courts.

The appellant has no choice but to persist as he is not capable of suicide.

J-A01019-14 Kozel v. Kozel #461 WDA 2013

J-A27027-13 Wagner v. Wagner #235 MDA 2013

J-S17007-13 Hauck v. Hauck #1984 WDA 2011

J-A02029-13 Reece v. Reece #987 WDA 2012

J-S21041/08 Danz v. Danz #1506 WDA 2007

J-A14035/09 Bingaman v Bingaman #1644 MDA 2008

J-A30006/02 Lazaric v. Lazaric #263 EDA 2002


Letter to United States Attorneys August 8, 2014

Letter to President Barack Obama July 28, 2014

Letter to US Senators Patrick Toomey and Robert Casey July 28, 2014

Letter to the Senators of the 113th Congress July 28, 2014

Letter to US Senate Committee on the Judiciary July 30, 2014

Letter to Sheriffs of Pennsylvania July, 31, 2014

Letter to Pennsylvania Senate Judiciary Committee July 31, 2014

Letter to United States House of Representatives July 30, 2014

Letter to US House Committee on the Judiciary July 30, 2014

Letter to Governor of EVERY state July 28, 2014

Letter to Governor Tom Corbett August 2, 2014

Letter to EVERY Pennsylvania Senator August 2, 2014

Letter to the Pennsylvania Legislature – Representatives August 2, 2014

Letter to Governor Tom Corbett, the Sheriffs of Pennsylvania, The Pennsylvania Legislature, the Attorney General of Pennsylvania August 3, 2014

HAND delivered - US Congressman Mike Fitzpatrick & PA Representative Thomas Murt

Continued our delivery of the letters to US Congressman Mike Fitzpatrick at his office in Newtown, PA...

On the way back we stopped for a delivery and DISCUSSION of the issues at the office of PA Representative Tom Murt in Hatboro, PA.

The following letters were included in the package. Each is different and exposes a different aspect of the Unconstitutional Effect of Rule 1.6.

- Letter to Governor Tom Corbett, Sheriffs of Pennsylvania, The Pennsylvania Legislature, and the Attorney General of Pennsylvania. PDF version
- Letter to President Barack Obama. PDF version
- Letter to US Senator Toomey and Senator Casey. PDF version
- Letter to the Senators of the 113th Congress. PDF version
- Letter to the US Senate Committee on the Judiciary. PDF version
- Letter to the Sheriffs of Pennsylvania. PDF version
- Letter to the Pennsylvania Senate Judiciary Committee. PDF version
- Letter to US House of Representatives. PDF version
- Letter to US House Committee on the Judiciary. PDF version
- Letter to Governors of the US. PDF version
- Letter to Governor Tom Corbett. PDF version
- Letter to the Pennsylvania Senators. PDF version
- Letter to the Pennsylvania Representatives. PDF version

Hand Delivery - State Reps & Senator Greenleaf

While the Fax machine was cooling off...

We set out to hand deliver copies of the correspondence to the state representative and senators who have local offices.

First stop, Pennsylvania Representatives Marquerite Quinn's office. Hand delivered the following documents and reviewed the issue with a member of her staff.

- Letter to Governor Tom Corbett, Sheriffs of Pennsylvania, The Pennsylvania Legislature, and the Attorney General of Pennsylvania. PDF version
- Letter to President Barack Obama. PDF version
- Letter to US Senator Toomey and Senator Casey. PDF version
- Letter to the Senators of the 113th Congress. PDF version
- Letter to the US Senate Committee on the Judiciary. PDF version
- Letter to the Sheriffs of Pennsylvania. PDF version
- Letter to the Pennsylvania Senate Judiciary Committee. PDF version
- Letter to US House of Representatives. PDF version
- Letter to US House Committee on the Judiciary. PDF version
- Letter to Governors of the US. PDF version
- Letter to Governor Tom Corbett. PDF version
- Letter to the Pennsylvania Senators. PDF version
- Letter to the Pennsylvania Representatives. PDF version

Next, Pennsylvania Representative Kathy Watson's office. Where a discussion about the failure to schedule a meeting for almost a year lead to a long discussion of the matter and the necessity to have a discussion with Rep. Watson. Hand delivered the same series of document as above.

Next, Pennsylvania Representative Todd Stephens was caught in his office. Delivered the letters to an unaware Todd Stephens who sat down for a brief meeting. The meeting reached the point where Rep Stephens attempted to indicate that the Courts can ignore constitutional rights because the courts decide if they are ignoring your constitutional rights. NO TODD, THEY CAN'T.

IS TODD STEPHENS A COMPLETE MORON WHEN IT COMES TO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS?

REP TODD STEPHENS WAS WRONG ON EVERY LEVEL BUT MOST CERTAINLY CONSTITUTIONALLY. Upon that descent into ridonculous, the meeting ended.

Rep Todd Stephens is on the Judiciary Committee. He knows better. OR HE OUGHTA. Even in lawyer night school they surely teach that the constitution is the 'supreme law of the land'. NOBODY CAN DENY RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES PROTECTED BY THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

Next, A stop at Senator Greenleaf's office. Where his Chief of Staff could be overheard to say "I DON'T WANT TO SEE HIM" - - which once overheard may explain the change of heart. Hand delivered the letters and asked AGAIN for a meeting with the Senator. Senator Greenleaf's office and staff know me. They know how disastrous and malicious the Montgomery County judiciary have been. Yet, they just won't schedule a meeting with the Senator.

Senator Greenleaf is the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee. He knows exactly what problem I am raising. AND HE IS AVOIDING THE ISSUE... it seems he's been there since it was created. A knowledgeable co-conspirator?

Back to the office to check out the fax... which was taking a break after a long hard week.

About that Sandusky Report

August 3, 2014

Governor Tom Corbett
Sheriffs of Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania Legislature
The Attorney General of Pennsylvania

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information was applicable to the ‘Sandusky Report’. As such, the report presented a very skewed version of events because the mandate of confidentiality undermined it from any impact. For example, we present a possible disclaimer which clearly was not included with the report.

Disclaimer
The Attorney General of Pennsylvania represents the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Governor, the Attorney General’s office, various branches of the government, their agencies and their officers.
The Rules of Professional Conduct – Rule 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION mandate confidentiality of client information where the information
- would affect the integrity of the judiciary,
- would reveal the prosecutorial misconduct of their own office,
- would expose individual liability,
- would adversely affect their client.

Office of the Attorney General
The Report from the Attorney General regarding the investigation of Gerald Sandusky may not legally present:
- anything which exposes a negative impact of the judiciary
- anything which exposes misconduct of Attorney General Tom Corbett
- anything which exposes misconduct of Governor Tom Corbett
- anything which exposes misconduct of Acting Attorney General William H. Ryan, Jr
- anything which exposes misconduct of Attorney General Linda Kelly
- anything which exposes misconduct of Attorney General Kathleen Kane
- anything which exposes misconduct of the Attorney General’s office
- anything which exposes misconduct of Frank Fina
- anything which exposes misconduct the Commonwealth
- anything which exposes misconduct of any state agency
- anything which exposes misconduct, participation or acts of obstruction by any of the above in their individual capacity, or as a conspiracy

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on April 3, 2009
- anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on May 2, 2009
- anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on April 9, 2012
- anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on April 18, 2012
- anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on June 16, 2012
- anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on July 4, 2012
- anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on November 21, 2013
- anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to create, modify or fine tune any “LAW” regarding the Confidentiality of Email concealed within the Rules of Professional Conduct.

Report Production
Further, acting as Attorney General, Kathleen Kane contracted the creation of the report to Widener University law professor and former federal prosecutor H. Geoffrey Moulton.
(You might say “Kathleen Kane is his client.” and that the Rules of Professional Conduct mandate his confidentiality for her protection. Because, SHE IS… and IT DOES.)

Constitutionally
The Report additionally will not contain any information regarding the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 – CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION which was filed in federal court on August 8, 2013 (by two men who do not have to maintain confidentiality) seeking to restore the constitutional rights of litigants while restoring the integrity and reputation of the judiciary and the legal profession and to deliver to the legislature the ability to perform the duties of their position to responsibly manage the law.

The Challenge has been presented to President Barack Obama and the United States Congress where every level of the state and federal judiciary have ignored the clear evidence of the Courts’ denial of constitutional rights and demonstrated their own actions to prevent resolution of the matter which was served to fifty-six states attorneys general – all of whom defaulted on the matter -- YET, THE COURT IGNORED THEIR DELIBERATE DEFAULT.

Political Campaign
Yes, Kathleen Kane shot her mouth off during her campaign for Attorney General of Pennsylvania,
AND
Kathleen Kane promised to investigate Attorney General Tom Corbett’s mishandling of the Sandusky case,
AND
Kathleen Kane believed Corbett to be stalling the case so it would not impact his run for Governor,
AND
Kathleen Kane was elected to the position of Attorney General,
AND
Kathleen Kane has an obligation to the People of The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

BUT, as Attorney General, these corrupt and incompetent horses asses are NOW her clients, her boss, and her staff… The RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT mandate her confidentiality.

Pennsylvania State Police
With regard to the non-participation of the Pennsylvania State Police in the preparation and assembly of this report…. Did someone tell the PA State Police that we wouldn’t publish anything they might have to say because of the confidentiality mandate? The State Police participation would have potentially required a great deal of redaction and editing.

The Pennsylvania State Police do NOT have a Confidentiality Mandate. If they were to issue a report, it would be different.

1.6 Confidentiality of Information – While the Model Rule 1.6(a) duty of confidentiality is closely related to the attorney-client privilege, it is broader in scope than the attorney-client privilege, “which is a rule of evidence,” or “the work product immunity which is a rule of procedure.”

Rule 1.6 causes a mandated confidentiality of information regarding injustice and judicial corruption.

This was demonstrated in Luzerne County where Kids For Cash was IGNORED by every judge, district attorney, prosecutor and lawyer… until Judge Ann Lokuta violated the law and called the FBI to report Ciavarella et al. Ann Lokuta was disciplined and removed from the bench for her violations of Rule 1.6.

The Foreclosure Crisis nationwide was caused similarly by an ACT OF FRAUD UPON THE COURT resulting in the loss of constitutional rights and the loss of homes to fraudulent actions filed by lawyers (and judges) MANDATED to maintain confidentiality.

THE STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS LET THIS HAPPEN TO MILLIONS OF PEOPLE.

Rule 1.6 mandates that an Attorney General ignore judicial corruption and injustice
- without regard for the number of children improperly incarcerated by a judge,
- without regard for the number of homes foreclosed upon using fraudulent documents,
- without regard for basic constitutional, civil and human rights,
- without regard for the denial of equal protection of the law,
- without regard for the law,
- without regard for an oath of office,
- without regard for ethics or morality, and
- without mercy for the victims overwhelmed, destitute and pushed to their limits who commit suicide.

Rule 1.6 DELIBERATELY PREVENTS LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL…

You attention to this matter of national importance is anticipated and expected. We are available to meet with you at any time to discuss this issue at length. Please contact us directly.

Respectfully,

Terance Healy
Todd M. Krautheim

Letter to Gov Corbett, PA Senators and Representatives

August 2, 2014

After meetings with Senator Chuck McIlhinney, it is clearly necessary to raise this issue to your attention directly.

The Interbranch Commission on Juvenile Justice was made up of lawyers (9 of 12) who heard information from county judges, district attorneys, public defenders and the Judicial Conduct Board. Attributing the blame to “silence, inaction, inexperience, ignorance, fear of retaliation, greed, ambition, carelessness.”, the lawyers on the commission maintained ‘confidentiality of information’ as required by law – Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

Their realization was correct – “What good would [reporting] it do?” HOWEVER, the Commission’s report neglected to indicate the reason for the silence (Rule 1.6) and it also neglected to expose the cause (the Rule 1.6 mandate) , and as such their recommended reforms do nothing to prevent a recurrence of the judicial corruption.

Rule 1.6 mandates confidentiality of information where it adversely affects the integrity of the judiciary, the reputation of legal professionals, self-incriminates, or negatively affects their client. Protecting the integrity of a judiciary which lacks integrity is foolishness. Mandating it has unconstitutional effects.

The Commission Report and Reform Recommendations amount to fraud – a deliberate effort to conceal the root cause of the failure of the justice system to address judicial misconduct, corruption and injustice.

Far more frightening and perilous, is that the lawyers associated with the Commission have now been ‘educated and trained’ in how to execute and conceal crimes such as those committed by Ciavarella and Conahan – who only went to prison because they had failed at money laundering.

The Supreme Court’s authority to enact law is limited to situations where ‘such rules are consistent with this Constitution [Pennsylvania] and neither abridge, enlarge or modify the substantive rights of any litigant.’

The Attorney General is the chief law enforcement officer in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania who must follow the US Constitution, the Pennsylvania Constitution, and the Rules of Professional Conduct which were enacted by the Supreme Court.

For the Attorney General, the Rule 1.6 mandate of ‘confidentiality of information’ with regard to client information undermines ‘everything’ where an attorney general’s clients include (1) the public, (2) the Pennsylvania government, (3) the Office of the Attorney General, (4) government agencies and departments statewide, (5) personnel within those agencies and departments, (6) and themselves.

The Rules of Professional Conduct enacted by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania have substantially affected the ‘jurisdiction’ of the Attorney General preventing and obstructing law enforcement responsibilities when it relates to judicial corruption and injustice within the courts.

The Supreme Court, by the same mandate, has caused a ‘lawful’ requirement within every court and by every lawyer in the commonwealth to ignore injustice and judicial corruption.

Previous Codes of Professional Responsibility (among other titles) have included similar guidelines, BUT once enacted into ‘law’ in 1987 ignoring injustice and judicial corruption ceased being discretionary and was MANDATED BY LAW.

The result, the Rules of Professional Conduct collaterally affect and negate ‘the substantive rights of the litigant’. Specifically, Rule 1.6 Confidentiality causes a mandatory conspiracy of silence within the courts which ignores the damage and harm caused to litigants and further hinders and prevents any resolution.

The substantive rights of the children and families of Luzerne County were clearly ignored.

The Supreme Court lacked authority to enact Rule 1.6 into law as the substantive rights of the People have been ‘abridged’, ‘modified’, denied and ignored.

Additionally, the role of the Sheriff as Chief Law Enforcement Officer in the county has been negated and minimized by judicial decisions. Constitutionally, the Sheriff has the lawful authority and resources to enforce the law within the county.

Failing to act because the judiciary has convinced them of a greatly diminished role, the non-lawyer Sheriffs (reluctantly) defer authority to the county District Attorney who must follow the Rules of Professional Conduct and Rule 1.6. A necessity to prevent prosecution. District Attorneys take no action to investigate and prosecute the injustice and judicial corruption. Related crimes against the victims of injustice are ignored leaving the litigant with no protection under the law.

The American Bar Association’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct were rolled out to the states and enacted into law nationwide without the involvement of the state legislatures, the signature of the governors or any constitutional review.

“What is right is not always the same as what is legal.” was offered by Edward Snowden as an explanation for his actions revealing unconstitutional activity. This statement may also apply to the failure of attorneys general, judges, district attorneys and lawyers to address the unconstitutional actions made ‘legal’ which have undermined justice over the last 25 years.

It is the responsibility of the Governor to represent the People, to preserve, protect and defend the United States Constitution and the state Constitution, and to recognize that collaterally Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional to the People.

The act of sedition which enacted Rule 1.6 and mandated the silent participation of all legal professionals, perverted the judiciary, sacrificed the personal integrity of every judge, and undermined justice can no longer be ignored and excused because of the intimidation and threats of disciplinary action by the corrupt who have deliberately violated the public trust.

The Commission on Juvenile Justice have not done what was requested of them. They have participated in concealing the truth. They have endorsed and enabled continuing injustice.

You, the members of the Legislature and the Judiciary who assembled the Interbranch Commission on Juvenile Justice must review their report findings and recommendations. The deliberate knowledgeable failure of those lawyers to indicate the root cause of the problem in Luzerne County, which also less publicly affects every court in the Commonwealth, was caused by Rule 1.6 - An unconstitutional and repugnant law which has been improperly enacted by the state Supreme Court without proper review of its affect on constitutional rights.

You attention to this matter of statewide importance is appreciated.

Respectfully,

Terance Healy
Todd M. Krautheim

Governors Updated and Informed

The Governors of the United States have received a letter updating them on the effort and asking for their assistance where their Attorneys General were not permitted to default in the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6.

Many Governors are NOT lawyers obligated to follow Rule 1.6. As such, they are not involved in the conspiracy to prevent this issue from being presented.

The NON-LAWYER Governors have the power to lawfully address the situation and take immediate action in their state.


Governor Robert Bentley of Alabama
Governor Lolo Letalu Matalasi Moliga
Governor Jan Brewer of Arizona
Governor John Hickenlooper of Colorado
Governor Jack Markell of Delaware
Governor Eddie Baza Calvo of Guam
Governor Neil Abercrombie of Hawaii
Governor C.L. Butch Otter of Idaho
Governor Terry Branstad of Iowa
Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana
Governor Paul LePage of Maine
Governor Martin O'Malley of Maryland
Governor Mark Dayton of Minnesota
Governor Phil Bryant of Mississippi
Governor Dave Heineman of Nebraska
Governor Pat McCrory of North Carolina
Governor Jack Dalrymple of North Dakota
Governor Eloy Inos of Northern Mariana Islands
Governor John Kasich of Ohio
Governor Mary Fallin of Oklahoma
Governor John Kitzhaber of Oregon
Governor Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island
Governor Nikki Haley of South Carolina
Governor Bill Haslam of Tennessee
Governor Rick Perry of Texas
Governor Gary Herbert of Utah
Governor Peter Shumlin of Vermont
Governor John deJongh, Jr of the US Virgin Islands
Governor Earl Ray Tomblin of West Virginia
Governor Scott Walker of Wisconsin


The following Governors are lawyers OBLIGATED under Rule 1.6 to ignore the Constitutional Rights of citizens while ignoring judicial corruption, crimes and misconduct, and the failure to prosecute crimes of the judiciary and of the legal professionals who might implicate the judiciary.

Governor Sean Parnell of Alaska (Puget Sound School of Law)
Governor Mike Beebe of Arkansas (University of Arkansas)
Governor Jerry Brown of California (Yale)
Governor Dan Malloy of Connecticut (Boston College)
Governor Rick Scott of Florida (Southern Methodist University)
Governor Nathan Deal of Georgia (Walter F. George School of Law)
Governor Pat Quinn of Illinois (Northwestern University)
Governor Mike Pence of Indiana (Indiana University)
Governor Sam Brownback of Kansas (University of Kansas)
Governor Steven L. Beshear of Kentucky (University of Kentucky)
Governor Deval Patrick of Massachusetts (Harvard)
Governor Rick Snyder of Michigan (University of Michigan)
Governor Jeremiah W. Nixon of Missouri (University of Missouri)
Governor Steve Bullock of Montana (Columbia University)
Governor Bruce Sandoval of Nevada ( )
Governor Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire (Northeastern School of Law)
Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey (Seton Hall University)
Governor Susana Martinez of New Mexico ( )
Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York (Albany Law School)
Governor Tom Corbett of Pennsylvania (St Mary's University School of Law)
Governor Alejandro Garcia Padilla of Puerto Rico (Interamerican University)
Governor Denis Daugaard of South Dakota (Northwestern University)
Governor Terry McAuliffe of Virginia (Georgetown Law School)
Governor Jay Inslee of Washington (Willamette University)
Governor Matt Mead of Wyoming (University of Wyoming)

Having a lawyer for a governor places a state under the control of the American Bar Association's Rule 1.6 with all branches of the state government - executive, legislative and judiciary - under the mandate of Rule 1.6 - Confidentiality of Information.

It makes the unconstitutionality of the rule IMPOSSIBLE to lawfully address.

It makes judicial crimes and corruption ILLEGAL to lawfully address. PREVENTING THOSE WHO HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY TO DO IT AND HAVE TAKEN AN OATH TO THAT EFFECT.

AG Kathleen Kane demonstrates Rule 1.6 Confidentiality

Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane neglected to include the following disclaimer in the Sandusky Report. This DISCLAIMER would have eliminated the questions raised by the report.

D I S C L A I M E R

The Attorney General of Pennsylvania represents the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Governor, the Attorney General's office, various branches of the government, their agencies and their officers. The Rules of Professional Conduct - Rule 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION mandate confidentiality of client information where the information - would affect the integrity of the judiciary, - would reveal the prosecutorial misconduct of their own office, - would expose individual liability, - would adversely affect their client.

AS SUCH...

The Report to the Attorney General in the Investigation of Gerald Sandusky may not legally present - anything which exposes a negative impact of the judiciary - anything which exposes misconduct of Attorney General Tom Corbett - anything which exposes misconduct of Governor Tom Corbett - anything which exposes misconduct of Acting Attorney General William H. Ryan, Jr - anything which exposes misconduct of Attorney General Linda Kelly - anything which exposes misconduct of Attorney General Kathleen Kane - anything which exposes misconduct of the Attorney General's office - anything which exposes misconduct of Frank Fina - anything which exposes misconduct the Commonwealth - anything which exposes misconduct of any state agency - anything which exposes misconduct, participation or acts of obstruction by any of the above in their individual capacity, or as a conspiracy - anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on April 3, 2009 - anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on May 2, 2009 - anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on April 9, 2012 - anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on April 18, 2012 - anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on June 16, 2012 - anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on July 4, 2012 - anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on November 21, 2013 - anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to create, modify or fine tune any "LAW" regarding the Confidentiality of Email concealed within the Rules of Professional Conduct.

Further, acting as Attorney General, I have contracted the creation of the report to Widener University law professor and former federal prosecutor H. Geoffrey Moulton. ( You might say "I am his client." and that the Rules of Professional Conduct mandate his confidentiality for my protection. ) Because, I AM. and IT DOES.

The Report additionally will not contain any information regarding the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 - CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION which was filed in federal court on August 8, 2013 (by two men who do not have to maintain confidentiality so we do it for them) seeking to restore the constitutional rights of litigants while restoring the integrity and reputation of the judiciary and the legal profession and to deliver to the legislature the ability to perform the duties of their position to responsibly manage the law.

The Challenge now approaches the United States Supreme Court and the United States Congress where every level of the state and federal judiciary has ignored the clear evidence of the Courts' denial of constitutional rights and demonstrated their own actions to prevent resolution of the matter which was served to fifty-six states attorneys general - all of whom defaulted on the matter... YET, THE COURT IGNORED THEIR DELIBERATE DEFAULT.

P.S.

Yes, I shot my mouth off during my campaign for Attorney General of Pennsylvania, AND I promised to investigate Attorney General Tom Corbett's mishandling of the Sandusky case, AND I believed Corbett to be stalling the case so it would not impact his run for Governor, AND I was elected to the position of Attorney General, AND I have an obligation to the People of The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, BUT, as Attorney General, these corrupt and incompetent horses asses are NOW my clients, my boss, and my staff... The RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT mandate confidentiality.

With regard to the non-participation of the Pennsylvania State Police in the preparation and assembly of this report.... Did someone tell the PSP that we wouldn't publish anything they might have to say because of our confidentiality mandate? Their participation would have potentially require a great deal of redaction and editing.

The Pennsylvania State Police do NOT have a Confidentiality Mandate. If they were to issue a report, I imagine it would be different.



1.6 Confidentiality of Information - While the Model Rule 1.6(a) duty of confidentiality is closely related to the attorney-client privilege, it is broader in scope than the attorney-client privilege, “which is a rule of evidence,” or “the work product immunity which is a rule of procedure.”

Rule 1.6 causes a mandated confidentiality of information regarding injustice and judicial corruption.

This was demonstrated in Luzerne County where Kids For Cash was IGNORED by every judge, district attorney, prosecutor and lawyer... until Judge Ann Lokuta violated the law and called the FBI to report Ciavarella et al. Ann Lokuta was disciplined and removed from the bench for her violations of Rule 1.6.

The Foreclosure Crisis nationwide was caused similarly by an ACT OF FRAUD UPON THE COURT resulting in the loss of constitutional rights and the loss of homes to fraudulent actions filed by lawyers (and judges) MANDATED to maintain confidentiality.

THE STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS LET THIS HAPPEN TO MILLIONS OF PEOPLE.
THEY. LET. IT. HAPPEN.

Rule 1.6 mandates that an Attorney General ignore judicial corruption and injustice
- without regard for the number of children improperly incarcerated by a judge,
- without regard for the number of homes foreclosed upon using fraudulent documents,
- without regard for basic constitutional, civil and human rights,
- without regard for the denial of equal protection of the law,
- without regard for the law,
- without regard for an oath of office,
- without regard for ethics or morality, and
- without mercy for the victims overwhelmed, destitute and pushed to their limits who commit suicide.

Rule 1.6 DELIBERATELY PREVENTS LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL...

If you want to do something evil, do it inside something boring

"If you want to do something evil, do it inside something boring." - John Oliver


How many people have read the Rules of Professional Conduct?


How many NON-LAWYERS have read the Rules of Professional Conduct?


The Rules of Professional Conduct directly apply only to lawyers and legal professionals, but collaterally some of the laws are unconstitutional. Once a person is affected by the unconstitutional aspect, they lose their rights.

No Constitutional protections. No equal protection under the law.

Oh, and your lawyer is not allowed to tell you about it, or explain it, or fight against it. They would be disciplined or disbarred.

NO HELP. NO ESCAPE. NO HOPE ... until you find out why.

Every lawyer is required to follow Rule 1.6 even after their death. So even a retired lawyer, or a disbarred lawyer, is not lawfully allowed to present the issue. What better way to conceal deliberate crime, judicial corruption and terroristic legal actions - like foreclosure based on fraud, child trafficking, financial ruin by false litigation, false incarceration....

The 90+ pages of laws enacted by the state supreme courts which undermine justice and make judicial misconduct and corruption impossible to expose and prosecute within the state, and further avoids attention unless someone violates the RULES and asks for federal intervention.

Even when the report of corruption is investigated and prosecuted by the federal government, the person who reported it is disciplined for violating the Rules.

A review of the Rules requires more than a cursory review of the rules. Each rule contains comments which are fully incorporated into the rules and explain how each rule is to be applied and interpreted. Most of the comments further refer to another rule by cross reference.

The needle in the injustice haystack... Rule 1.6 - CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION.

The unconstitutional aspect is buried in a book of laws you do not have to follow,...
inside a rule which every lawyer understands to be attorney-client privilege, ...
where on the surface the rule requires all misconduct, or the appearance of misconduct to be reported,...
but, in the comments section every requirement to report the misconduct is excused...
and there is a MANDATE to conceal anything which adversely affects the integrity of the judiciary or the legal profession.

The American Bar Association has demonstrated their knowledge that IF YOU WANT TO DO SOMETHING EVIL, DO IT INSIDE SOMETHING BORING.

And if you dare to survive to expose their crime,
every aspect of your life will be destroyed...
EVERY ASPECT...
to conceal their crime.

When CAROLYN TORNETTA CARLUCCIO learned that the corruption of the judiciary was documented and on the court record, she issued a deliberately defective and void court order where she lacked jurisdiction - throwing me out of my home, selling it illegally, disposing of EVERYTHING I owned.
She knew her order was defective and void.
She knew her actions were not part of her judicial immunity.
She knew other judges would not expose her crime.
She knew her actions would negate the judicial immunity for the entire matter.
The matter has been before 20 judges of the Montgomery County Judiciary.
Their terror and injustice is documented on the court record since 2007.
The matter has been stalled on Appeal in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
The county judges know they have committed treason.
The county judges know the Appeals Court will become involved in concealing their treason.
At the time she issued her MALICIOUS defective and void order and subsequent orders designed to cause desperation and suicide, Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio was the President of the Montgomery County Bar Association.
Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio's prior employment in the US Attorneys Office grants her an exemption from any investigation by that office.
Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio believes herself to be untouchable.
Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio brags about her breach of ethics in Real Estate dealings where she has had a clear conflict of interest.
Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio is a carefully and deliberately constructed judicial sociopath, and to hear her floundering from the bench MAKING INCREDIBLE SHIT UP you discover she is completely stupid.

The crimes remain unprosecuted because District Attorney Risa Ferman can't prosecute a judge.
The crimes remain unprosecuted because Attorney General Kathleen Kane can't prosecute a judge.
The crimes remain unprosecuted because Attorney General Linda Kelly couldn't prosecute a judge.
The crimes remain unprosecuted because Attorney General Tom Corbett couldn't prosecute a judge.
The crimes remain unprosecuted because the FBI will not enter a jurisdiction without an invitation from the District Attorney or the Attorney General.
The crimes continue.

There are now three Appeals before the Superior Court of Pennsylvania... each being prevented and obstructed by the judges... Carluccio, Page and Weilheimer.
The appeals court judges will become involved in the treason of the lower court judges.

The Federal Court judges have demonstrated their corruption, treason and conspiracy to conceal the matter.

Their terror has not stopped. I face it every minute of every hour of every day... since 2007. They won't stop. There is no incentive for them to stop. They believe themselves to be untouchable. There is no relief. There is no escape...

It became necessary to find out why... and I found Rule 1.6 which undermined every court in the United States. Written by the American Bar Association to deliberately undermine JUSTICE. They have succeeded in undermining and nullifying the entire Judicial Branch of he American government.

Sedition... by an Organization... Conspiracy of CONFIDENTIALITY.

It could have been resolved at any time by judges and lawyers who recognized the UNCONSTITUTIONALITY.
When I 'made a federal case out of it' it could have been resolved, but the federal courts stuck their heads up their asses.
So it is going to require an Act of Congress for me to get divorced... and they exposed the deliberate corruption of the American Bar Association and their effective overthrow of the United States Government... Everything that goes before the judiciary is without jurisdiction as it is biased by the sedition and treason of the ABA and missing a very essential element of due process.

If you SEE something, SAY something.

Senator Charles McIlhenny non-Lawyer Why has Senator McIlhenny neglected to inform the Pennsylvania Legislature of the Constitutional Challenge?

Senator Pat Toomey non-LAWYER Met with member of his staff - June 2014.

Senator Bob Casey LAWYER Just can't get a meeting.

Attorney General Eric Holder LAWYER Could resolve the matter in a minute. The single most powerful decision maker in the matter. Just can't get a meeting.

Attorney General Kathleen Kane LAWYER It would seem that Kane's staff has undermined her sense of justice.

Senator Stewart Greenleaf LAWYER Judiciary Committee Chief of Staff notified. Just can't get a meeting.

Governor Tom Corbett LAWYER Hand delivered. Just can't get a meeting.

Newt Gingrich non-Lawyer Hand delivered. Awaiting response.

Representative Kate Harper LAWYER Knows all about the corruption and the Challenge of Rule 1.6. BUT, hasn't done anything.

Representative Todd Stephens LAWYER Knows all about the corruption and the Challenge of Rule 1.6. BUT, hasn't done anything ... but offer to do something which he never does. OY!.

Representative Kathy Watson LAWYER REFUSES to meet on the issue.

The Attorney / Client Rhetoric

The Attorney / Client Rhetoric

First, Rule 1.6 is called CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION. It is NOT called Attorney-Client privilege.

The thing is that Lawyers, such as the state Attorneys General, are often not even certain of their client.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 is demonstrating the attorneys general dancing around the responsibilities of their office.

From the National Association of Attorneys General we can learn about their dance moves.

So, How to Decide Who Is The Client? The answer is not as simple as picking one from a list of the alternatives. A variety of courts and authors have considered the issue deciding who the client of the government attorney might be. The general consensus is that there are five possible answers to the question: - Public - Government as a whole - Branch of government in which employed - Particular agency or department - Responsible officers who make decisions with an agency or department

NOW, as AG you have to maintain confidentiality of information for all of the above 'clients'.

AND

You must follow Rule 1.6... and maintain confidentiality where the information
- would affect the integrity of the judiciary,
- would reveal the prosecutorial misconduct of their own office, or
- would expose individual liability.

Do you now see why lawyers are not legally allowed to even approach the unconstitutional aspects of Rule 1.6?

But two pro se litigants with over 8 years of experience with the terror of injusrtice are lawfully allowed to do what the lawyers made illegal for each other to do.

Healy & Krautheim can address the unconstitutionality... They file... SILENCE.

Take a look at recent events... Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane has ended a multi-year investigation of corruption where confidential informant(s) were deliberately targeting and setting up a handful of black politicians in Philadelphia. Never so succesfully to result in any prosecution. And this had been going on for years (AG Tom Corbett) and years (AG William Ryan) and years (AG Linda Kelly). The investigation was halted upon the election of AG Kane. So who is the Attorney General's client? Herself? Her predecessors? The Commonwealth? The AG's Office? The Investigators? The Public? Along comes Frank Fina beating his chest like TARZAN and making all kinds of ridiculous accusations about what the Attorney General is keeping secret about HIS investigation gone horribly off track. Fina is a lawyer. He's making broad remarks... wide allegations... talking about the information he knows can't be presented... If any of them ever get specific about the information... They will violate Rule 1.6 Confidentiality and be disciplined/prosecuted. Rule 1.6 is how corruption goes unprosecuted and unpunished. Rule 1.6 is being used as a political game to mislead the public. They all know what they cannot say. They know what each other cannot say. Whenever you are viewing the actions of lawyers who must follow the mandate for corruption and injustice defined by Rule 1.6... The story is more about what they are not saying... and what they are accusing each other of not saying... because they feel safe, hidden and protected. Rule 1.6 is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Imagine. The things we will learn about corruption and injustice when their safe, protected hiding place is no longer available. Those with honor and integrity will be clearly revealed once they are not required to conceal the criminal malice, corruption and injustice of those who undermine our society. Hey Frank Fina... Sit down with us and we will explain it to you. Shouting loud at Attorney General Kathleen Kane who cannot lawfully respond is a cowardly move. Bring the media... It's time the people learned what has happened to their Constitution.

JUSTICE IS COMING.

STANDING: Case and Controversy before the Court

How's this for some STANDING? THE CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE OF RULE 1.6
THE CONTROVERSY BEFORE THE COURT

Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane's deliberate and intentional failure to take any action regarding the denial of the constitutional rights of the litigants is the basis of the 'controversy' before the Court. The Attorney General has done nothing.

Attorney General Kane's failure to take any action results in the denial of the constitutional rights of the litigants. The Attorney General has failed to execute the responsibilities of the Office of Attorney General.

(So did Pennsylvania Attorney General Linda Kelly.
So did Pennsylvania Attorney General Tom Corbett.
So did every Attorney General upon whom the Challenge was served. How's that for some case/controversy and standing for fixing this nationwide problem?)

Attorney General Kane cites Article 5 Section 10 of the Pennsylvania Constitution as the 'lawful' basis for non-responsibility and inaction.

'Lawful' BUT UNCONSTITUTIONAL IS NOT LAWFUL even when enacted by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

The Attorneys General of Pennsylvania have repeatedly indicated a lack of jurisdiction or 'lawful' inability to become involved in the cases of the litigants and the basis for inaction.

The Plaintiff's challenge a law Rule 1.6 which collaterally results in the denial of their constitutional rights.

Any law which denies rights and liberties is repugnant to the US Constitution and is a nullity.

The Attorney General's 'lawful' inaction and 'lawful' failure to address an UNCONSTITUTIONAL law enacted by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is the Constitutional Controversy before the Court.

The Attorney General's 'lawful' actions are unconstitutional and are not lawful.

How's that for a case and controversy pursuant to Article III?
It's already been accepted that Rooker-Feldman and Younger are NOT valid doctrine for dismissal of the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6.

---

NOW, TELL ME AGAIN WHY THE COURT FAILED TO ASK EACH STATE IF THE LAW WAS CONSTITUTIONAL? Why did the court fail to CERTIFY the Constitutional Challenge? I think that answer is clear.

THE COURT KNOWS THE ANSWER TO THE 'Is Rule 1.6 constitutional?' QUESTION.

Plaintiffs have stated that Rule 1.6 sacrifices the reputation and integrity of the judiciary.

'Lawfully but unconstitutionally' under Rule 1.6, the Attorney General is mandated to not reveal the unconstitutionality of Rule 1.6 as it applies to the litigants... The court knew this and failed to Certify the Constitutional Challenge.

Judicial Reputation and integrity sacrificed... and FAILED ANYWAY.

JUSTICE IS COMING.

Bucks County Commissioners

Todd Krautheim and Terance Healy appeared at the Bucks County Commissioners meeting this morning and presented the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct and requested the support of the county in presenting the issue and the challenge to those who can help with the resolution of the matter.

Krautheim explained and again requested the assistance of the County Commissioners in the matter. The Bucks County Commissioners are Robert G. Loughery, Charles H. Martin, and Diane M. Ellis-Marseglia.

Krautheim further explained the loss of rights. The loss of constitutionally protected rights is something difficult for Americans to comprehend.

Healy and Krautheim responded to the questions.

Healy and Krautheim's experiences were discussed briefly. The issue is not the experience, but the resultant loss of rights. The example of Cash for Kids scandal in Luzerne County was offered as an extreme case. No one understood how Cash for Kids could have happened, and gone ignored for so long, and affected so many children and families. Suddenly, there was a reason being presented and the room seemed to understand. There was no lawful approach to the scandal.

Healy explained the problem law being enacted through an unlawful action by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Further explaining how the legislature could not lawfully address the law once enacted. They explained how the Attorney General could not take lawful action against the law. Actually, three PA Attorneys General could not address the issue. Tom Corbett. Linda Kelly. Kathleen Kane.

Someone asked which Governor had signed the law. There had been no governor's signature. The law was enacted by the Supreme Court in an action which usurped the authority of the legislature and the governor.

The inaction of Attorney General Kathleen Kane was profered as political rhetoric. Healy immediately addressed the AGs lawful responsibility to follow the law. Yes, the Attorney General had to ignore the injustice.

The room fell silent when it was stated that the identical law - RULE 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION - had been enacted in every US State.... and the author of the rule was the American Bar Association. Even the lawyers were silent.

Copies of the challenge were hand delivered to the Commissioners and made available to everyone in attendance.

The Commissioners pointed to a representative from the local newspapers with the suggestion of that being the first place to pursue further action.

It was then explained that while copies of the Challenge Document were hand delivered to each local newspaper in Bucks and Montgomery County, and the Philadelphia television stations had also received copies... there had been no word about the challenge in any media.

The meeting ended with alot of people having questions on their mind and a definitive interest in reading about this injustice spreading across the United States, and the resolution just beginning to see the light of day.

Healy and Krautheim appreciated the opportunity to present the issue, and additionally that the usual restriction on time for public comments was not an issue. The genuine interest of the commissioners and the audience in the room was greatly appreciated.... and a sign of hope. People have understood that the constitution was being ignored, but lacked the understanding of how to visualize it. It was demonstrated in Bucks County. Justice is coming.

Attorney General Kathleen Kane uses the Chewbacca Defense

In an amazing demonstration, in the Motion To Dismiss filed by Randall Henzes on behalf of Attorney General Kathleen Kane of Pennsylvania, they utilize THE CHEWBACCA DEFENSE - "a technique so advanced nobody understands it."

THE CHEWBACCA DEFENSE

...ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, I have one final thing I want you to consider. Ladies and gentlemen, this is Chewbacca. Chewbacca is a Wookiee from the planet Kashyyyk. But Chewbacca lives on the planet Endor. Now think about it; that does not make sense! Why would a Wookiee, an 8-foot-tall Wookiee, want to live on Endor, with a bunch of 2-foot-tall Ewoks? That does not make sense! But more important, you have to ask yourself: What does this have to do with this case? Nothing. Ladies and gentlemen, it has nothing to do with this case! It does not make sense! Look at me. I'm a lawyer defending the [Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania], and I'm talkin' about Chewbacca! Does that make sense? Ladies and gentlemen, I am not making any sense! None of this makes sense! And so you have to remember, when you're in that jury room deliberatin' and conjugatin' the Emancipation Proclamation, does it make sense? No! Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, it does not make sense! If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must [dismiss]! The defense rests.

To think this kind of farce is going on in courtrooms across the United States is demonstrative of why the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct was filed. The AGs cannot lawfully address the issues of judicial misconduct, and the resulting crime... so they stick their heads up their asses and act like those reporting it and suffering from it are crazy. Ever fearful of the ABSOLUTE DESTRUCTION which befalls anyone who addresses the crime. Those who violate Rule 1.6 and are disbarred and destroyed. It is a career, and life ending act.

That's why it could only be lawfully filed by NON-lawyers.... and after they had been robbed of everything, including their constitutional rights while ignored by every level of law enforcement. Destroyed and terrorized until they HAD to find the resolution... their only escape.

Everything about the Motion To Dismiss is "horseshit". It would be funny except that it is not.

Every citation is irrelevant. It does not make sense.

Every reference is irrelevant. It does not make sense.

Every footnote is incorrect. It does not make sense.

It is a clear representation of THE CHEWBACCA DEFENSE. They will continue on with such incredible inanity until exhaustion is the cause for dismissal.

They don't give a fuck that people's lives are being destroyed while they play their joke. The suggestion that I suffered through 8 years of terror and injustice just so I could play with them is twisted. Kathleen Kane, you, Tom Corbett and Linda Kelly never answered your phone when people called you to do your job. You have permitted the people to be terrorized for long enough. WE FOUND THE EXIT. LET US FREE.



Kathleen Kane won't even take calls emails or any form of contact to address or discuss the Federal filing. Remarkable, that she hasn't reviewed her office phone records and see the hundreds of calls from me over the last 8 years.

The insult of having to respond to deliberate error and improper citation. This is really the best they could do? NO. IT IS ALL THEY CAN DO. THEY HAVE NO LAW TO TO USE AGAINST ME FOR POINTING OUT THEIR ACTIONS WHICH UNDERMINED THE CONSTITUTION. THEIR DELIBERATE AND INTENTIONAL LACK OF RELEVANCE IS FRIGHTENING.

The retaliatory actions against the Plaintiffs has never subsided. The damage to property, cars, homes, constant daily harassment by phone, after 8 years, Terance Healy would rather have committed suicide. But, he's not capable so he lives to be terrorized another day. Emotionally, physically, mentally exhausted. The methods of terror being exposed weekly in the newspapers that he has experienced personally for the last 8 years while under the Rules which allow judicial terrorism.

Call off the private investigators who stalk and repeatedly tamper with my 80 year old mother's car. The flat tires are not even annoying or funny. The lack of coordination is demonstrated by the failure to know which tire is affected. When tires were rotated, the problem didn't rotate. MORE THAN ONCE! Devices attached to the house are available for retrieval. The water company can't explain your devices. The chips are cancer inducing, yet the bio bonding glue is worse. It is very caustic and the topical affect is life threatening. The sonic noise interferes with my mother's hearing aids. It is causing her ears to be constantly infected. But there's no stopping the terror.

I suggest people start attaching the entire Rule 1.6 Challenge to their 1983 Abuse of Judicial Power Complaints. That is the script they are running to excuse judicial crimes. When you attach the Rule 1.6 challenge to your 1983 complaint, they can't follow their usual script because they can't address your loss of constitutionally protected rights... not without revealing the judicial crimes... and that would violate Rule 1.6 if they did so.

ASK YOURSELF...

1.) Why did no one from Pennsylvania prosecute Judge Ciavarella when he threw 5000 children in jail?

2.) Why was the one judge who spoke out against Judge Ciavarella removed from the Bench? Ask Judge Ann Lokuta.

3.) Why was Ann Lokuta not permitted to return to the bench after Judge Ciavarella went to prison?

The answer is simple, Rule 1.6 prevented it. Lawfully requiring the Attorney General of the state to ignore the crime and participate in concealing it from Federal Authorities.

4) Why do you think Jerry Sandusky was permitted to rape and molest children on the campus of Penn State University?

Find the act of judicial misconduct, and you will find the crime, the conspiracy and the state-wide cover-up... BECAUSE IT IS MANDATED BY LAW.

Rule 1.6 - "No, that's just ...." Extend the deadline - indefinitely.

What? Rule 1.6? That's not...? That's just...? Huh? Oh it's about...
All of the reasons that you would NEVER look at Rule 1.6...
Reasons you should ignore Rule 1.6...
Move along... it doesn't concern you. UNTIL IT DOES.

Rule 1.6 hides as a rule regarding Attorney-Client privilege.

Attorney-Client privilege builds trust based on the acceptance of concealing fraud and lies... even when the lies and fraud are presented in the court as truth.

Rule 1.6 is a smokescreen. A catch all which can be twisted as needed. The scripts are published. Everything about it is smoke and mirrors. Everything about it is wrong.

Rule 1.6 prevents lawful action by law enforcement to prosecute crimes by judges. How many judges have ever been prosecuted by a state for judicial misconduct? How many states stopped judicial misconduct from continuing? In Pennsylvania alone, the situation is clear. This isn;t attacking judicial immunity for errors in judgment. This is criminal actions and terror which is reported and goes unaddressed, unproscecuted, and unstopped. Cash for Kids is the most blatant in memory. But it seems the concept that everyone looked the other way was acceptable. WHY did they think their actions were lawful? Because Rule 1.6 made it not only lawful, but MANDATORY.

Attorney General Tom Corbett did nothing. Attorney General Linda Kelly did nothing. Attoenry General Kathleen Kane has been provided the opportunity to explain the failures of her predecessors. The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 which has been served to AG Kane and the Attorneys General of the untied States provides the opportunity to end the lawful dismissal of criminal actions by the judiciary. BUT, it exposes the Rule which caused the inability to prosecute law. It exposes the organization behind the Rule adopted and enacted in every US state.

The American Bar Association.

Now, we have a much bigger problem. Treason? Sedition? RICO organization? With lawyers in every level of government who MUST follow their Rule 1.6 or face the consequences for breaking it. Violate Rule 1.6 and you are ruined, disbarred, and attacked. Any lawyer who dares to sp[eak out against a judge is not only ruined. They are destroyed. The penalties for violating Rule 1.6 are as extreme as if you were a victim of it's destructive effect on justice.

The opportunity to lawfully address it was lawfully laid upon the Federal Bench in Philadelphia on August 8, 2013 by two pro se litigants who lawfuilly had standing, a lawful cause for relief, a court record to lawfully correlate their loss of rights and the sense to lawfully present the matter as a constitutional challenge lawfully permitting them to lawfully address the unconstitutional law in every state.

The Defendant AGs who could not lawfully respond to the Challenge... did the only lawful thing they could think of without mentioning any of the issues. They cannot address the issues lawfully, because any action which addresses the issues would be construed as violating Rule 1.6.

With the other AGs hiding in silence and WITHOUT ANY BASIS for the request, AG Kathleen Kane requested an extension in the deadline.

Judge O'Neill extended the deadline INDEFINITELY.

INDEFINITELY.

Jurisdiction - The lie which conceals injustice.

The LIE of not having jurisdiction is intended to make people go away. Judges act without jurisdiction. ALOT. When they do, there is no way to address their lack of jurisdiction, because Rule 1.6 prevents exposure of the 'misconduct' of the judge, or the lawyer who perverted the legal proceedings. Eighteen judges of the Montgomery County Judiciary sacrificed their integrity for the fraud committed by one of their own. Their abuse of power under color of law is astounding and can only be described as terror.

Rule 1.6 prevents anyone from helping... BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT PERMITTED TO EXPOSE THE 'MISCONDUCTS'.

They then tell you they do not have jurisdiction. THIS IS A LIE. They are not allowed to tell you there has been a misconduct which prevents justice in your matter. So, they pretend you are completely ignorant about jurisdiction.

The lack of jurisdiction is a LIE.

The Attorney General in each state is the highest law enforcement officer in the state. They have jurisdiction to combat crimes, corruption, and every level of wrongdoing and injustice.

BUT, as lawyers the Attorneys General are MANDATED to ignore anything which exposes misconduct of lawyers and the judiciary.

RULE 1.6 trumps jurisdiction.
RULE 1.6 trumps all other law.
RULE 1.6 trumps justice.
RULE 1.6 trumps ethics and morality.
RULE 1.6 ignores the Constitution of the United States.
RULE 1.6 targets its victims with complete loss of protection of the law, absolute injustice, denial of any course of action to escape, and prevents anyone from doing anything to help. The victims of injustice have all been denied the true explanation for why they became disenfranchised.

Attorney General Tom Corbett had jurisdiction.
Attorney General Linda Kelly had jurisdiction.
Attorney General Kathleen Kane has jurisdiction to prosecute corrupt judges, but she lacks the lawful ability to act. Rule 1.6 made it impossible for them to fully accomplish their responsibilities as Attorney General.

Think of any scandal where a judge was prosecuted. Ask yourself who prosecuted the matter? Federal prosecutors. The State did not act. Now consider that the State Attorneys General have been compelled by Rule 1.6 to ignore the crimes of the judiciary and the membership of the bar.

What Attorneys General do not have is the legal ability to address corruption in the legal system, or make any change which would provide that lawful ability.

It might seem they are too ashamed to tell you, EXCEPT THAT THEY CANNOT LAWFULLY TELL YOU because RULE 1.6 prevents them from telling you the truth.

That Rule 1.6 results in the complete loss of constitutional rights to the victims of unaddressable misconduct. It further prevents any lawyer or judge taking any action to correct the MASSIVE FAILURE in this law.

The only way to make the change is for someone with no legal background to come along, to have been terrorized for years by injustice, to find and recognize the failure in the LAW, and to address the law in the only way possible and lawful.

Fix it yourself... so that's what was done.

It is necessary that he learn, study, review research and then serve the resolution back to those who were made lawfully incapable of taking any action to help him.

The only way out is through a victim. I am that victim. I have survived their terror. Through it all, i was able to persevere. And I have served the resolution which permits the return to justice to the Attorneys General of the entire United States.

I have filed in Federal Court a Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Civil Action 13-4614.

JUSTICE IS COMING.

So when Robert Mulle, Chief Deputy Attorney General - Legal Review Section writes on August 20, 2013 that "Mr. Healy has contacted this office in the past and has explained his situation. Mr Healy has been advised on many occasions that this office does not have jurisdiction to intervene on his behalf and that is still the position of this office." ROBERT MULLE IS TELLING A LIE. The Office does have jurisdiction. He is just not lawfully permitted to tell the truth, or to take any action. Robert Mulle is shamed and humiliated into a lie in order to continue unconstitutional injustice and terror of a victim who begged for help. The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 will return integrity to the judicial system and to the Attorney Generals as well. Robert Mulle can live with his past lies and shame.