The use of confidential informants, their handlers and private investigators to set up people targeted for destruction by the county is pervasive.
For their safety, I have not posted the names pictures and stories of those used in the actions which FAILED to result in my prosecution. THEY FAILED. They failed to create the criminal to prosecute.
BUT, where I get punished because of their failure to make me a criminal. Where I have continued to be denied Life and liberty, protection of the law and my constitutional rights. Why should I be the responsible protective citizen? Let them deal with the bloodbath when their 'personnel' are exposed. Courtesy of those capable of hurting people. The ones they 'tricked' and jailed. Their lives and futures destroyed.
The only way to end a war "with a person who spends his/her professional life figuring how to [screw] others…” is to expose them for the corrupt criminal frauds that they are. Former District Attorney Bruce Castor summed up his methods concisely on NYE. Then when not appointed Attorney General decided to return to the DA's position of twisted and perverted power.
Their informants handlers and investigators are about to become VERY exposed. Every single one who planted the devices cleared out by the sheriffs department on the day I was thrown out of my home by a corrupt court order. Every one who hit that shelf in the bathroom while setting their devices. Names and pictures... including the cities where they relocated. Bios, pictures, addresses and videos.
And the effort to conceal all of the failed investigative information by using a grand jury, doesn't require me to not IDENTIFY each person and the tactics utilized as they terrorized my life, spied and recorded every interaction, and paralyzed me with fear while they met within earshot.
When they informed and threatened my children who now fear any interaction because of what you will do to them if they 'slip up'.
The twisted monsters in law enforcement who are above the law running the drug trade and creating their new stories. The people who lie so often to everyone and themselves cannot recognize the truth and have no sense of honor and responsibility. Their crimes are justified by lies. Concealed by further lies... and injustice, and grand juries, and secret court orders.
Without the secrecy and protection of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information, law enforcement would not be able to conceal their investigation and false litigation and manipulations which denied constitutional rights and the protection of the law. That lawlessness continues because otherwise this target will survive to expose that law enforcement committed major crimes and constitutional violations which were concealed by a corrupted judiciary.
WHAT IF: Sorry Mr. Healy, but your wife's attorneys leveraged a massive investigation into you. It failed to produce the desired results BUT it did terrorize you for several years. They then leveraged that to coerce Carolyn Carluccio to go FULL FORCE TO SUICIDE. That failed too. The grand jury is concealing it, BUT every judge in Montgomery and the Superior Court has been manuipulated into approving the actions to terrorize you for years. Your suicide was a necessity and your survival makes things difficult. Your survival was not expected AND PLACES OUR CAREERS AT RISK because we wasted millions trying to destroy you.
The lawyers who tricked the county into becoming their tools in a divorce would turn on them and leverage the extensive county efforts which failed to set-up the target. Sociopath lawyers who will stop at nothing. And the law enforcement and judiciary which will capitulate. A sickening disgraceful twisted plot.
Enough is enough.
Handlers never tell the informants that they will end up dead OR be prosecuted anyway. Even in Hollywood, there's always have that scene where the handler is sad because they lost ANOTHER informant. They are consoled by being reminded they lost others by another handler who lost others. The joke - Handlers that care even when they lose EVERY informant.
Confidential Informants are always one degree away from lawyers and law enforcement. This is useful to leverage their participation and threaten them to do ANYTHING requested no matter how wrong or immoral.
Showing posts with label Confidential. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Confidential. Show all posts
Friday, January 30, 2015
Saturday, October 4, 2014
Rule 1.6 Injustice by Confidentiality - Case Analysis
Rule 1.6 Injustice by Confidentiality - Case Analysis
- observations and tactics to expect when cases are affected by Rule 1.6 Injustice and Confidentiality
- where the following sentence applies, you are experiencing Rule 1.6 Injustice and the denial of every normal expectation of constitutional rights, protection of the law, freedom, life, liberty and ability for happiness."I am a sane man dealing with an absolutely insane situation. Every person in a position to help has acted improperly in direct violation of procedures and the law preventing the resolution of any matter… they each make the situation worse… NO ONE HELPS."
- expected outcome 1) Homeless/Destitute, 2) Incarcerated, 3) Suicide
- there is currently no way out.
- Persevere. Justice is coming.
It is essential to remember - THE LOGIC IS TWISTED.ACTIONS ARE BEING COMMITTED AGAINST THE VICTIM
TO MAINTAIN A GENERAL ILLUSION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
WHILE THE RIGHTS OF THE VICTIM ARE FURTHER IGNORED.
Everyone believes that they have constitutional rights up until the moment when they don't. At that point, there is nothing anyone can or will do to address the loss of constitutionally protected rights. Protecting the illusion takes precedence over protecting your rights.
WHY? It would be simpler to protect your rights. That that would expose a corrupt judge and Rule 1.6 Confidentiality silences anything which would adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary and the reputation of lawyers.
Rule 1.6 Injustice is triggered when a fraud occurs and the crime is endorsed by a judge. You will likely not be aware or informed of the event. Rule 1.6 Confidentiality will apply and it will begin to interfere immediately.
1.) Determining when your case has been affected is best identified by your experience.
- Intuition will suggest that something has gone wrong.
- The law will be ignored.
- Your rights will be ignored.
- Communication will become guarded.
- Questions will be ignored.
- People will act as if it is their first day on the job.
- Information will be unavailable.
- You will be called "crazy".
2.) Determining the event which has occurred to cause the injustice is difficult. Everything associated with the event will be concealed by Confidentiality by everyone.
- You are seeking something which is being hidden from you.
- You may talk about it. "They" can not and will avoid the discussion.
- People will lie to your face.
- People are not comfortable telling lies.
- Seek information respectfully.
- These people are forced to lie to you.
- IT IS NOT PERSONAL.
- The feeling that people are talking about you or plotting is not imagined.
- You will be called "paranoid".
3.) When you ask about something and are called "crazy" and "paranoid" at the same time, you are closing in on the trigger event. You may even have asked a direct question where a direct answer would expose the trigger event. The namecalling is a stall used when people feel cornered. An unjustified out of the blue insult.
- People will become nervous, very nervous, and fearful of repercussions for revealing the confidential information. Their fear is real. Nothing can be gained from applying pressure.
- IT IS NOT PERSONAL.
- They likely fear for their job if they blow it.
- This can be indicated by anger, unreasonableness, and a rude exit.
When the trigger event is inquired about, or raised in the court, it will be as if it was never said.
4.) Where the judge ignores a relevant event, breaches court procedure, denies reasonable discovery, neglects to consider an event or issue which has not been refuted - Remember the opposing lawyer is not permitted to discuss it. You have identified the event trigger. The judge is also participating in the Confidentiality.
5.) Where the judge begins a conference or proceeding by raising a topic for the first time, or sarcastically chastising you for asserting your rights, you can be assured that the judge has become directly involved in preventing the fraud from being exposed or addressed by others in law enforcement.
The judge IS protecting the perpetrator, concealing the fraud, and is directly and actively involved in the prevention and denial of your rights and any protection under the law.
The multiplicity of additional frauds should be expected. The earliest event is the true trigger.
6.) Where the lawyer wishes to involve the judge further in the scheme, the lawyer will fail to follow procedures, the law, court orders, etc. The judge will dismiss the neglect without sanction, and often just ignore the neglect.
Where these actions affect the jurisdiction of the court, the judge will ignore the lapse. A lawyer who fails to recognize that only one trigger is required, may manipulate the judge by further failures.
Errors in procedure which affect the jurisdiction of the court are ignored. Appeals are prevented. You have no rights. Confidentiality will prevent any subsequent judge from addressing the failure.
7.) When the lawyer has failed and the judge has excused without consequence, there is a fraud. The failure is being excuse because it points directly to a fraud event.
8.) A Challenge in court which exposes a CONFIDENTIALITY of Fraud will usually result in a spontaneous recusal of the judge.
9.) "That's just crazy." and "They can't do that." Every time you communicate with anyone (except a dumbass) and they say either phrase. Your experience is confirmed. Your rights and the law are being denied. Your response should be "BUT, THEY DID."
REMEMBER: Identifying/Exposing the fraud event DOES NOT not change your situation.
Once the trigger event has occurred, there is no recovery, no relief, and no escape.
The resources available to undermine your life extend beyond any realistic comprehension.
10.) You are at risk. You can be terrorized and denied your rights and the protection of the law by anyone. By incorporating the 'fraud' of your case into a subsequent case, anyone is protected and permitted to commit frauds while reaping the benefits of Confidentiality.
11.) Identifying "They". Once triggered, Confidentiality is system-wide – incorporating ALL lawyers, ALL judges, and ALL law enforcement. [ The "THEY" to whom the victims of injustice often refer. ]
"They" can include the direct employees of the lawyers, the judges and law enforcement.
The District Attorney, and the DA's office, county detectives and the local police.
The District Attorney will not prosecute a crime against you where it could expose the Confidentiality effort.
Local Police will not take a report against a judge, reports of crimes committed against you will go no further than the District Attorney.
County Detectives will be instructed by the District Attorney to take no action on your behalf.
Every resource and service within the county can, and likely will, be used against you.
False reports to mental health departments may have people arrive at your door without any explanation of why they are there or who told them to 'check on you'. Where they cannot provide any answer because of confidentiality, they will accuse you of paranoia. They only want to help. (Yet, they have no idea who you are or why they are at your door.) [Try to laugh. They are being used.]
Any Medical or Assistance Benefits you seek from the county or the state will be denied with directions that the denial may be appealed to the court.
False Reports to Police will be a regular occurrence. You will not be informed. The reports will indicate that "You are not to be informed because it would make you angry." The reports will remain unsubstantiated and uninvestigated. Their primary function is for character assassination.
A long list of reports... you are not aware of them... the perception is that you are lying. The police do not care or want any explanation. The initial impression can not be adjusted. When you try to report a crime, the disrespect will begin as soon as that list is displayed.
Police will ignore any complaints indicating it is a civil matter and you must take it to the courts.
The inverse is NOT true though, the police will participate fully when called against you.
Communications between the judiciary and the police will be kept confidential where police may be instructed by the judge that crimes against you are endorsed, excused and ignored.
Private Investigators may be utilized to harass, antagonize or implicate you in criminal activity.
Reports of intrusive activities by private investigators using technology will not be investigated by any level of law enforcement.
The availability of intrusive technology to private investigators, local police, county detectives, and federal authorities permits the misuse of the technology at any time. A violation of your privacy and personal space which can be manipulated against you.
[ THE TECHNOLOGY INTRUSION - EDWARD SNOWDEN WAS NOT PERMITTED TO REVEAL. ]
Federal law enforcement authorities will not get involved unless the complaint/report is provided by an attorney.
Federal law enforcement authorities will not get involved where CONFIDENTIALITY efforts will be revealed by their actions.
The County District Attorney controls and coordinates all law enforcement activities within the county.
The news media who will not present any aspect of your experience, but will distribute suggestions, falsehoods, misinformation, disinformation, and unsubstantiated allegations against you when provided by the District Attorneys Office.
Your reputation can be attacked and discredited at any time without consequence.
YOU HAVE BEEN THE VICTIM OF A FRAUD. A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF RESOURCES ARE ENGAGED TO CONCEAL THAT FRAUD.
THE EFFORT TO PREVENT AND DENY JUSTICE IS REAL, BUT, IT IS NOT PERSONAL.
THE RESOURCES HAVE NOT BEEN DISPATCHED WITH THE INTENTION/PURPOSE OF DESTROYING YOUR LIFE.
THEIR PURPOSE IS TO PROTECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIARY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT AND TO CONCEAL THAT YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS HAVE BEEN IGNORED AND VIOLATED.
THEY WILL ACCOMPLISH THIS BY FURTHER IGNORING, DENYING, VIOLATING, PREVENTING AND INTERFERING WITH YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
This concept was confirmed by Representative Todd Stephens, formerly of the Montgomery County District Attorneys Office, member of the Judiciary Committee, when he indicated that a person does not have constitutional rights unless a judge decides that they have constitutional rights.
He's WRONG. Every American has rights which are protected and secured by the US Constitution.
But, in practice, Todd Stephens has succinctly indicated exactly what has occurred.
A judge has concealed a fraud in a matter before the court. CONFIDENTIALITY was triggered.
A judge has made a decision which has denied a litigant of their rights. The litigant has no rights, or protections... and no one can or will address the situation within state or federal government.
A judge has the unconstitutional ability to effectively deny a citizen of their rights, their life and their freedom... and their hope. There is no allowance or opportunity for redress or rebuttal.
An absolutely inconceivable notion. AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONCEPT - which utilizes an unconstitutional law to mandate efforts AGAINST the victim ... AGAINST THE VICTIM. THE VICTIM GETS DESTROYED. While 'THEY' hide behind a terroristic unconstitutional aggressively enforced confidentiality.
In August 2007, Judge Rhonda Lee Daniele issued a secret court order - I've never met, seen or stood before her bench. Yet, that event caused the denial of every constitutional right and prevented protection of the law, harassing and terrorizing every moment of my life since, and preventing any possible future.
It took three years, August 2010, everyone involved lied, until one day the divorce clerk handed me a folder that contained a one page court order as had been described by police used to effect the robbery of my home in violation of multiple court orders by 20 people with 12 trucks and vehicles. Never prosecuted by the DA. Where the judge had called police to tell them to ignore it. Where the judge had refused to permit me to read the document shown to him in a proceeding, where everyone lied about the document's existence, where it had NOT been docketed in the case; where it had not been distributed in the case; an order which slandered me as a monster AND prevented any contact with my children; while there had been no hearing or opportunity to defend; where the divorce clerk was IMMEDIATELY not at work for the next few weeks and was paralyzed with fear upon seeing me; where every member of the courthouse was aware of what 'they' had done to him; where I documented the discovery in filings and judicial complaints which included a concern that the clerk had been fired for his inadvertent action; where his first words to me after were "I need my job"; where the conduct board IGNORED the complaints; where the case had already had more than 10 judges involved; where the judge again immediately recused without explanation; where all petitions filed by me were completely IGNORED until the most vile and corrupt Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio also serving as President of the Montgomery County Bar Association who's illegal and unlawful documented actions against the VICTIM were unconscionable and destructive.
For my daring to survive, Carluccio went FULL FORCE FOR THE SUICIDE - making me homeless, illegally selling my home (involving an innocent family - that case affected by the fraud involved in the sale); denying any financial compensation; throwing out EVERY personal belonging from my lifetime; corruptly ordering the court staff to NOT PROCESS and prevent any proceedings or appeals where her defective and void orders had violated established Pennsylvania Law.
(Appeals to Superior Court would cleanly expose the federal unconstitutional aspects within the court record. When this occurred 3 judges later, in July 2013, it was the efforts which prevented the appeal that exposed that Rule 1.6 Confidentiality - the needle in the haystack of injustice.)
AND, it still continues presently.
Judge Rhonda Lee Daniele: To conceal a crime committed by my wife's lawyer, her former clerk... I should lose my life, be terrorized and denied any opportunity for a future,
The victim who dared to survive - and document the experience - who discovered the systemic problem in American Justice and Law Enforcement that targets and destroys innocent people. Where an the act of fraud at the whim of a judge unleashes the full resources of government TO KEEP CONFIDENTIAL THE JUDGE'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL DENIAL OF RIGHTS at any and every cost... and to threaten any politician who dares to become involved.
What has become of America? A victim is terrorized. A machine built to destroy lives. Lawyer manipulated Confidentiality out of control.
Rule 1.6 is UNCONSTITUTIONAL... RULE 1.6 IS EVIL.. JUSTICE IS COMING.
- observations and tactics to expect when cases are affected by Rule 1.6 Injustice and Confidentiality
- where the following sentence applies, you are experiencing Rule 1.6 Injustice and the denial of every normal expectation of constitutional rights, protection of the law, freedom, life, liberty and ability for happiness.
- expected outcome 1) Homeless/Destitute, 2) Incarcerated, 3) Suicide
- there is currently no way out.
- Persevere. Justice is coming.
It is essential to remember - THE LOGIC IS TWISTED.
TO MAINTAIN A GENERAL ILLUSION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
WHILE THE RIGHTS OF THE VICTIM ARE FURTHER IGNORED.
Everyone believes that they have constitutional rights up until the moment when they don't. At that point, there is nothing anyone can or will do to address the loss of constitutionally protected rights. Protecting the illusion takes precedence over protecting your rights.
WHY? It would be simpler to protect your rights. That that would expose a corrupt judge and Rule 1.6 Confidentiality silences anything which would adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary and the reputation of lawyers.
Rule 1.6 Injustice is triggered when a fraud occurs and the crime is endorsed by a judge. You will likely not be aware or informed of the event. Rule 1.6 Confidentiality will apply and it will begin to interfere immediately.
1.) Determining when your case has been affected is best identified by your experience.
- Intuition will suggest that something has gone wrong.
- The law will be ignored.
- Your rights will be ignored.
- Communication will become guarded.
- Questions will be ignored.
- People will act as if it is their first day on the job.
- Information will be unavailable.
- You will be called "crazy".
2.) Determining the event which has occurred to cause the injustice is difficult. Everything associated with the event will be concealed by Confidentiality by everyone.
- You are seeking something which is being hidden from you.
- You may talk about it. "They" can not and will avoid the discussion.
- People will lie to your face.
- People are not comfortable telling lies.
- Seek information respectfully.
- These people are forced to lie to you.
- IT IS NOT PERSONAL.
- The feeling that people are talking about you or plotting is not imagined.
- You will be called "paranoid".
3.) When you ask about something and are called "crazy" and "paranoid" at the same time, you are closing in on the trigger event. You may even have asked a direct question where a direct answer would expose the trigger event. The namecalling is a stall used when people feel cornered. An unjustified out of the blue insult.
- People will become nervous, very nervous, and fearful of repercussions for revealing the confidential information. Their fear is real. Nothing can be gained from applying pressure.
- IT IS NOT PERSONAL.
- They likely fear for their job if they blow it.
- This can be indicated by anger, unreasonableness, and a rude exit.
| The County Ethics Policy also lack ethics. Mandating that county employees conceal information or face dismissal. The lack of any basis in ethics is consistent withe the lawyers minimal ethical standard which requires a lack of ethics, morality and integrity. |
When the trigger event is inquired about, or raised in the court, it will be as if it was never said.
4.) Where the judge ignores a relevant event, breaches court procedure, denies reasonable discovery, neglects to consider an event or issue which has not been refuted - Remember the opposing lawyer is not permitted to discuss it. You have identified the event trigger. The judge is also participating in the Confidentiality.
5.) Where the judge begins a conference or proceeding by raising a topic for the first time, or sarcastically chastising you for asserting your rights, you can be assured that the judge has become directly involved in preventing the fraud from being exposed or addressed by others in law enforcement.
The judge IS protecting the perpetrator, concealing the fraud, and is directly and actively involved in the prevention and denial of your rights and any protection under the law.
The multiplicity of additional frauds should be expected. The earliest event is the true trigger.
6.) Where the lawyer wishes to involve the judge further in the scheme, the lawyer will fail to follow procedures, the law, court orders, etc. The judge will dismiss the neglect without sanction, and often just ignore the neglect.
Where these actions affect the jurisdiction of the court, the judge will ignore the lapse. A lawyer who fails to recognize that only one trigger is required, may manipulate the judge by further failures.
Errors in procedure which affect the jurisdiction of the court are ignored. Appeals are prevented. You have no rights. Confidentiality will prevent any subsequent judge from addressing the failure.
7.) When the lawyer has failed and the judge has excused without consequence, there is a fraud. The failure is being excuse because it points directly to a fraud event.
8.) A Challenge in court which exposes a CONFIDENTIALITY of Fraud will usually result in a spontaneous recusal of the judge.
9.) "That's just crazy." and "They can't do that." Every time you communicate with anyone (except a dumbass) and they say either phrase. Your experience is confirmed. Your rights and the law are being denied. Your response should be "BUT, THEY DID."
REMEMBER: Identifying/Exposing the fraud event DOES NOT not change your situation.
Once the trigger event has occurred, there is no recovery, no relief, and no escape.
The resources available to undermine your life extend beyond any realistic comprehension.
10.) You are at risk. You can be terrorized and denied your rights and the protection of the law by anyone. By incorporating the 'fraud' of your case into a subsequent case, anyone is protected and permitted to commit frauds while reaping the benefits of Confidentiality.
11.) Identifying "They". Once triggered, Confidentiality is system-wide – incorporating ALL lawyers, ALL judges, and ALL law enforcement. [ The "THEY" to whom the victims of injustice often refer. ]
"They" can include the direct employees of the lawyers, the judges and law enforcement.
The District Attorney, and the DA's office, county detectives and the local police.
The District Attorney will not prosecute a crime against you where it could expose the Confidentiality effort.
Local Police will not take a report against a judge, reports of crimes committed against you will go no further than the District Attorney.
County Detectives will be instructed by the District Attorney to take no action on your behalf.
Every resource and service within the county can, and likely will, be used against you.
False reports to mental health departments may have people arrive at your door without any explanation of why they are there or who told them to 'check on you'. Where they cannot provide any answer because of confidentiality, they will accuse you of paranoia. They only want to help. (Yet, they have no idea who you are or why they are at your door.) [Try to laugh. They are being used.]
Any Medical or Assistance Benefits you seek from the county or the state will be denied with directions that the denial may be appealed to the court.
False Reports to Police will be a regular occurrence. You will not be informed. The reports will indicate that "You are not to be informed because it would make you angry." The reports will remain unsubstantiated and uninvestigated. Their primary function is for character assassination.
A long list of reports... you are not aware of them... the perception is that you are lying. The police do not care or want any explanation. The initial impression can not be adjusted. When you try to report a crime, the disrespect will begin as soon as that list is displayed.
Police will ignore any complaints indicating it is a civil matter and you must take it to the courts.
The inverse is NOT true though, the police will participate fully when called against you.
Communications between the judiciary and the police will be kept confidential where police may be instructed by the judge that crimes against you are endorsed, excused and ignored.
Private Investigators may be utilized to harass, antagonize or implicate you in criminal activity.
Reports of intrusive activities by private investigators using technology will not be investigated by any level of law enforcement.
The availability of intrusive technology to private investigators, local police, county detectives, and federal authorities permits the misuse of the technology at any time. A violation of your privacy and personal space which can be manipulated against you.
Federal law enforcement authorities will not get involved unless the complaint/report is provided by an attorney.
Federal law enforcement authorities will not get involved where CONFIDENTIALITY efforts will be revealed by their actions.
The County District Attorney controls and coordinates all law enforcement activities within the county.
The news media who will not present any aspect of your experience, but will distribute suggestions, falsehoods, misinformation, disinformation, and unsubstantiated allegations against you when provided by the District Attorneys Office.
Your reputation can be attacked and discredited at any time without consequence.
YOU HAVE BEEN THE VICTIM OF A FRAUD. A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF RESOURCES ARE ENGAGED TO CONCEAL THAT FRAUD.
THE EFFORT TO PREVENT AND DENY JUSTICE IS REAL, BUT, IT IS NOT PERSONAL.
THE RESOURCES HAVE NOT BEEN DISPATCHED WITH THE INTENTION/PURPOSE OF DESTROYING YOUR LIFE.
THEIR PURPOSE IS TO PROTECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIARY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT AND TO CONCEAL THAT YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS HAVE BEEN IGNORED AND VIOLATED.
THEY WILL ACCOMPLISH THIS BY FURTHER IGNORING, DENYING, VIOLATING, PREVENTING AND INTERFERING WITH YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
This concept was confirmed by Representative Todd Stephens, formerly of the Montgomery County District Attorneys Office, member of the Judiciary Committee, when he indicated that a person does not have constitutional rights unless a judge decides that they have constitutional rights.
He's WRONG. Every American has rights which are protected and secured by the US Constitution.
But, in practice, Todd Stephens has succinctly indicated exactly what has occurred.
A judge has concealed a fraud in a matter before the court. CONFIDENTIALITY was triggered.
A judge has made a decision which has denied a litigant of their rights. The litigant has no rights, or protections... and no one can or will address the situation within state or federal government.
A judge has the unconstitutional ability to effectively deny a citizen of their rights, their life and their freedom... and their hope. There is no allowance or opportunity for redress or rebuttal.
An absolutely inconceivable notion. AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONCEPT - which utilizes an unconstitutional law to mandate efforts AGAINST the victim ... AGAINST THE VICTIM. THE VICTIM GETS DESTROYED. While 'THEY' hide behind a terroristic unconstitutional aggressively enforced confidentiality.
In August 2007, Judge Rhonda Lee Daniele issued a secret court order - I've never met, seen or stood before her bench. Yet, that event caused the denial of every constitutional right and prevented protection of the law, harassing and terrorizing every moment of my life since, and preventing any possible future.
It took three years, August 2010, everyone involved lied, until one day the divorce clerk handed me a folder that contained a one page court order as had been described by police used to effect the robbery of my home in violation of multiple court orders by 20 people with 12 trucks and vehicles. Never prosecuted by the DA. Where the judge had called police to tell them to ignore it. Where the judge had refused to permit me to read the document shown to him in a proceeding, where everyone lied about the document's existence, where it had NOT been docketed in the case; where it had not been distributed in the case; an order which slandered me as a monster AND prevented any contact with my children; while there had been no hearing or opportunity to defend; where the divorce clerk was IMMEDIATELY not at work for the next few weeks and was paralyzed with fear upon seeing me; where every member of the courthouse was aware of what 'they' had done to him; where I documented the discovery in filings and judicial complaints which included a concern that the clerk had been fired for his inadvertent action; where his first words to me after were "I need my job"; where the conduct board IGNORED the complaints; where the case had already had more than 10 judges involved; where the judge again immediately recused without explanation; where all petitions filed by me were completely IGNORED until the most vile and corrupt Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio also serving as President of the Montgomery County Bar Association who's illegal and unlawful documented actions against the VICTIM were unconscionable and destructive.
For my daring to survive, Carluccio went FULL FORCE FOR THE SUICIDE - making me homeless, illegally selling my home (involving an innocent family - that case affected by the fraud involved in the sale); denying any financial compensation; throwing out EVERY personal belonging from my lifetime; corruptly ordering the court staff to NOT PROCESS and prevent any proceedings or appeals where her defective and void orders had violated established Pennsylvania Law.
(Appeals to Superior Court would cleanly expose the federal unconstitutional aspects within the court record. When this occurred 3 judges later, in July 2013, it was the efforts which prevented the appeal that exposed that Rule 1.6 Confidentiality - the needle in the haystack of injustice.)
AND, it still continues presently.
Judge Rhonda Lee Daniele: To conceal a crime committed by my wife's lawyer, her former clerk... I should lose my life, be terrorized and denied any opportunity for a future,
The victim who dared to survive - and document the experience - who discovered the systemic problem in American Justice and Law Enforcement that targets and destroys innocent people. Where an the act of fraud at the whim of a judge unleashes the full resources of government TO KEEP CONFIDENTIAL THE JUDGE'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL DENIAL OF RIGHTS at any and every cost... and to threaten any politician who dares to become involved.
What has become of America? A victim is terrorized. A machine built to destroy lives. Lawyer manipulated Confidentiality out of control.
Rule 1.6 is UNCONSTITUTIONAL... RULE 1.6 IS EVIL.. JUSTICE IS COMING.
Thursday, October 2, 2014
Ethics becomes No Ethics at All
In 1987, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court enacted the Rules of Professional Conduct into law describing the rules as "a minimal ethical standard" for the practice of law.
Ethics seeks to resolve questions dealing with human morality - concepts such as good and evil, right and wrong, virtue and vice, justice and crime.
Ethics involves systematizing, defending and recommending concepts of right and wrong conduct, and methods to address disputes.
Ethical Standards are principles which when followed, promote values such as trust, good behavior, fairness, and/or kindness.
There are four general factors which are involved in ethics.
1) Law, 2) Policies, 3) Individual Application. 4) Consequences
1) Law - A society is bound by laws. These laws define the difference between right and wrong, and what is considered acceptable behavior. People must abide by the laws.
2) Policies - Within society, or within smaller groups, a set of clearly stated, highly ethical policies takes the guesswork out of decisions made which represent the group. When properly trained, members actions and reactions become second nature. Ensuring those policies are ethically sound removes the possibility for improper actions or decisions.
3) Individual Ethics - Individuals determine their personal integrity and moral values based on heritage and upbringing, education, and positive reinforcement of ethical actions.
4) Consequences - The consequences for ignoring or breaking an ethical standard exist within each factor. Violate the law and you will be prosecuted. Violating a policy and the infraction affects the group - the action affects the respect accorded the group and can negatively impact the morale of other members. Noncompliance with ethical standards at the individual level damages integrity and reputation.
An Ethics Policy MUST provide a process to resolve conflicts which permits those experiences to benefit the individual through information, the group through policy adjustment and training, and society which can enact laws to prevent future conflict.
Where ethical conflict resolution does not develop and promote ethical behavior, the individual, the group and the society are prevented from the experience, knowledge and reinforcement of an ethical standard.
Ethics develop personal integrity and moral values. Groups benefit from the personal ethics of members which further promotes the reputation and integrity of the group. Society systematizes, promotes and defends the laws developed from the moral and ethical standards of the people.
A societies concept of good and evil, right and wrong, virtue and vice, justice and crime is derived from the values of it's people.
Ethical behavior is good, right, virtuous and just. Unethical behavior is evil, wrong, a vice and a crime.
A society uses laws to promote, protect and encourage the ethical behaviors and beliefs within the society while discouraging, prosecuting and correcting the unethical ones.
FOUNDED ON PRINCIPLES
The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights and The Constitution of the United States include the basic concepts upon which the United States was established. The documents include the general principles and ethics for our society which have been and are used to understand, interpret and develop the laws.
The US Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land - the moral and ethical standard under which our society agrees to exist.
Federal Law cannot exist where it violates the US Constitution.
State Constitutions exist within the framework established in the US Constitution.
State Law cannot exist where it violates the State Constitution or the US Constitution.
If any law is unconstitutional, it is not a law. EXCEPT... that only works in principle. Until a law is not a law, it is still pretty much a law. Lawmakers review proposed laws during their construction for constitutionality, and sometimes a situation is not realized. The Not-A-Law gets enacted, signed by the Executive, and that Not-A-Law then begins to affect the society.
The unconstitutional Not-A-Law is not consistent with the moral and ethical standards of society and can cause 'damage' to individuals or groups until the issue is addressed.
On Petition, the courts review the issue of constitutionality and decide if
a) The law is the law.
b) The Not-A-Law is a nullity.
** The Courts have dismissed the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6. The basis for dismissal is unsubstantiated. The doctrine for dismissal does not apply to pre-emptive constitutional challenges. Facts are ignored. Everything dismissed on paper without any hearings.
The American Bar Association developed the Rules of Professional Conduct and presented them as an ethical standard for lawyers. "The Rules" are actually not based or supported by ethical or moral principles. "The Rules" are based on continuing in the way things have always been done - using the same flawed logic for supporting statements. One pervasive concept throughout the ABA ethics program is the constant cross reference to Rule 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY of INFORMATION.
Rule 1.6 is a deception. At face value, Rule 1.6 requires the lawyer take responsibility and accountability by reporting all acts of misconduct to disciplinary authorities. That moral high ground erodes quickly upon application of the cross references which mandate silence. Excusing silence where the information would adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary... or affect the reputation of the legal profession... or affect their law offices... or affect their client. The resultant Rule 1.6 is empty and left completely ineffective to address reporting the misconduct which on its face could suggest esteem-worthy. In the void left behind, Rule 1.6 is an aggressively enforced mandate of confidentiality which conceals corruption and injustice within the judiciary and the legal profession. [Shaking Head] Well, Rule 1.6 is not titled REPORTING MISCONDUCT - because it's not about that. Rule 1.6 is titled CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION - and it is all about silence, and maintaining confidentiality without the interference of ethics, morals or conscience.
A Group has presented their group policy to the state to elevate into law.
WHY? [No Answer]
As a group policy, constitutionality is not generally problematic. Group Policies must still follow the LAW. Group policies typically refine or specify "a higher ethical standard" which benefits the group through higher esteem, reputation and integrity.
The ABA knows that the "Model Rules" violate the US Constitution. In February 1983, the ABA House of Delegates had met, debated and decided to further remove provisions in the Confidentiality clause. Already constitutionally questionable, the removal further affected the rights of the victims of fraud.
The ABA removed two provisions from Rule 1.6 Confidentiality which permitted a lawyer to speak where silence would conceal or permit “substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another";
and
where the lawyer was seeking "to rectify the consequences of a client’s criminal or fraudulent act in the furtherance of which the lawyer’s services have been used.”
The decision by the ABA is clearly on the wrong side of the law, AND contrary to the moral and ethical standards of society.
WHY DID THE ABA PRESENT THEIR RULES TO THE STATE SUPREME COURTS TO ELEVATE INTO LAW KNOWING THAT THEIR CONFIDENTIALITY CLAUSE WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL?
Participating in a crime, voluntarily or not, lawyers are mandated to conceal information which denies, prevents and obstructs justice. The revised Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information affect the victim's rights which are believed o be secured by the First Amendment, Fourth Amendment, Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment, Tenth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. Further, the mandated silence causes the lawyer to directly participate in the commission and furtherance of a crime, and to conceal that personal participation and involvement from all law enforcement authorities.
Seriously, the "minimum ethical standard' joke should have been the punchline. The ABA Model Rules is a code of unethical conduct, enacted into unconstitutional law, MANDATING a lawyer sacrifice personal reputation, ethics, integrity and morality.
The 'minimal ethical standard' descriptor seems greatly over-exaggerated where the rules require unethical, immoral, and illegal behaviors.
A Group policy which violates ethics, morality, justice and the Law destroys the ethical integrity of the group.
The ABA mandated unethical and immoral participation in criminal actions by attorneys which permit the commission and furtherance of a fraud and the conspiracy to conceal the crime from law enforcement and prosecution. The ABA's Rules of Professional Conduct is void of ethical considerations.
And...
But...
The American Bar Association has actually done it. The ABA has made unethical behavior a requirement within their Rules of Professional Conduct - their 'minimum ethical standard".
The unconstitutional law has been enacted by every state supreme court. It would take 25 years to find the constitutional problem. Rule 1.6 Confidentiality effectively concealed judicial corruption, injustice. The courts ignored the Rule of Law and the US Constitution without being held accountable.
The nation would quickly begin to notice that something is wrong with the US Constitution.
A President would snap that "The Constitution is just a god-damned piece of paper."
The stage was set. The fraud of the National Foreclosure Crisis began in states where the commission of fraud by lawyers within the court was kept CONFIDENTIAL. No one has been prosecuted.
TREASON - A deliberate act of sedition by the American Bar Association which undermined the judiciary at state and federal levels and prevented the government from it's proper function.... executed in every state from 1984 to 2009.
DID NOT ONE OF THE 50 STATE SUPREME COURTS REVIEW THE RULES BEFORE THEY ENACTED LAW?
[COUNTERPOINT]
BUT, when a lawyer knows something is unconstitutional, they will fight for their client. They will report and expose the corruption within the judiciary.
That is a beautiful and respectable ideal which completely ignores reality.
Before the issue of corruption is heard in any court, the constitutional advocate/civil rights lawyer will be suspended from the practice of law, or disbarred, for adversely affecting the integrity of the judiciary and the reputation of lawyers.
The lawyer's personal reputation will be attacked. The lawyer's careers will be maligned. They will become disenfranchised from the community of lawyers. Those actions against the lawyer, though criminal, are considered acceptable and appropriate when exposing the truth would violate Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information - any publicity would adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary and the reputation of lawyers.
Additional events extend the same state Rule 1.6 Confidentiality Rule to include all state and federal courts... and every level of state and federal law enforcement. There seems to have been great effort has gone into assuring that an KNOWN TO BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL state law which inexplicably trumps the Rule of Law, the state Constitution and the US Constitution affects every court jurisdiction and all state and federal law enforcement.
Where the state Supreme Courts may have recognized their error, The Rule 1.6 Confidentiality clause prevents even the supreme court from addressing their own misdeed.
At every level of the courts, and law enforcement, there exists an ABA affiliated bar association and the opportunity to undermine and interfere with the course of justice. Efforts which prevent access to the courts, including forgery and issuing unsigned per curiam orders, are unexplained, omit facts, create fictions and fail to cite the applicable law. Rule 1.6 Confidentiality extends to conceal any effort action which prevent the judiciary from being adversely affected.
The Judiciary in whom the people placed their trust has become undone by the American Bar Association. The ABA has undermined the authority of the judiciary by affecting judicial independence which is an essential element for jurisdiction. The authority of the courts has been leveraged throughout the government undermining the Constitution, affecting and ignoring the overreach of the Executive, while observing the failure of the Legislative branch which is determined to accomplish nothing.
The United States Constitution needs to be rebooted.
Removing Unconstitutional Rule 1.6 is the first step it the recovery from the corruption and injustice of the last 25 years.
Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information is unconstitutional, immoral, unethical, improper, prevents, defies, conceals, undermines, usurps, destroys, overwhelms. Rule 1.6 KILLS.
Justice is coming.
Every. Person. Matters.
Ethics seeks to resolve questions dealing with human morality - concepts such as good and evil, right and wrong, virtue and vice, justice and crime.
Ethics involves systematizing, defending and recommending concepts of right and wrong conduct, and methods to address disputes.
Ethical Standards are principles which when followed, promote values such as trust, good behavior, fairness, and/or kindness.
There are four general factors which are involved in ethics.
1) Law, 2) Policies, 3) Individual Application. 4) Consequences
1) Law - A society is bound by laws. These laws define the difference between right and wrong, and what is considered acceptable behavior. People must abide by the laws.
2) Policies - Within society, or within smaller groups, a set of clearly stated, highly ethical policies takes the guesswork out of decisions made which represent the group. When properly trained, members actions and reactions become second nature. Ensuring those policies are ethically sound removes the possibility for improper actions or decisions.
3) Individual Ethics - Individuals determine their personal integrity and moral values based on heritage and upbringing, education, and positive reinforcement of ethical actions.
4) Consequences - The consequences for ignoring or breaking an ethical standard exist within each factor. Violate the law and you will be prosecuted. Violating a policy and the infraction affects the group - the action affects the respect accorded the group and can negatively impact the morale of other members. Noncompliance with ethical standards at the individual level damages integrity and reputation.
An Ethics Policy MUST provide a process to resolve conflicts which permits those experiences to benefit the individual through information, the group through policy adjustment and training, and society which can enact laws to prevent future conflict.
Where ethical conflict resolution does not develop and promote ethical behavior, the individual, the group and the society are prevented from the experience, knowledge and reinforcement of an ethical standard.
Ethics develop personal integrity and moral values. Groups benefit from the personal ethics of members which further promotes the reputation and integrity of the group. Society systematizes, promotes and defends the laws developed from the moral and ethical standards of the people.
A societies concept of good and evil, right and wrong, virtue and vice, justice and crime is derived from the values of it's people.
Ethical behavior is good, right, virtuous and just. Unethical behavior is evil, wrong, a vice and a crime.
A society uses laws to promote, protect and encourage the ethical behaviors and beliefs within the society while discouraging, prosecuting and correcting the unethical ones.
FOUNDED ON PRINCIPLES
The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights and The Constitution of the United States include the basic concepts upon which the United States was established. The documents include the general principles and ethics for our society which have been and are used to understand, interpret and develop the laws.
The US Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land - the moral and ethical standard under which our society agrees to exist.
Federal Law cannot exist where it violates the US Constitution.
State Constitutions exist within the framework established in the US Constitution.
State Law cannot exist where it violates the State Constitution or the US Constitution.
If any law is unconstitutional, it is not a law. EXCEPT... that only works in principle. Until a law is not a law, it is still pretty much a law. Lawmakers review proposed laws during their construction for constitutionality, and sometimes a situation is not realized. The Not-A-Law gets enacted, signed by the Executive, and that Not-A-Law then begins to affect the society.
The unconstitutional Not-A-Law is not consistent with the moral and ethical standards of society and can cause 'damage' to individuals or groups until the issue is addressed.
On Petition, the courts review the issue of constitutionality and decide if
a) The law is the law.
b) The Not-A-Law is a nullity.
** The Courts have dismissed the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6. The basis for dismissal is unsubstantiated. The doctrine for dismissal does not apply to pre-emptive constitutional challenges. Facts are ignored. Everything dismissed on paper without any hearings.
PRESENTMENT OF UNETHICAL RULES BY THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION ENACTED BY STATE SUPREME COURTS INTO UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW
The American Bar Association developed the Rules of Professional Conduct and presented them as an ethical standard for lawyers. "The Rules" are actually not based or supported by ethical or moral principles. "The Rules" are based on continuing in the way things have always been done - using the same flawed logic for supporting statements. One pervasive concept throughout the ABA ethics program is the constant cross reference to Rule 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY of INFORMATION.
Rule 1.6 is a deception. At face value, Rule 1.6 requires the lawyer take responsibility and accountability by reporting all acts of misconduct to disciplinary authorities. That moral high ground erodes quickly upon application of the cross references which mandate silence. Excusing silence where the information would adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary... or affect the reputation of the legal profession... or affect their law offices... or affect their client. The resultant Rule 1.6 is empty and left completely ineffective to address reporting the misconduct which on its face could suggest esteem-worthy. In the void left behind, Rule 1.6 is an aggressively enforced mandate of confidentiality which conceals corruption and injustice within the judiciary and the legal profession. [Shaking Head] Well, Rule 1.6 is not titled REPORTING MISCONDUCT - because it's not about that. Rule 1.6 is titled CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION - and it is all about silence, and maintaining confidentiality without the interference of ethics, morals or conscience.
WHY? [No Answer]
As a group policy, constitutionality is not generally problematic. Group Policies must still follow the LAW. Group policies typically refine or specify "a higher ethical standard" which benefits the group through higher esteem, reputation and integrity.
The ABA knows that the "Model Rules" violate the US Constitution. In February 1983, the ABA House of Delegates had met, debated and decided to further remove provisions in the Confidentiality clause. Already constitutionally questionable, the removal further affected the rights of the victims of fraud.
The ABA removed two provisions from Rule 1.6 Confidentiality which permitted a lawyer to speak where silence would conceal or permit “substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another";
and
where the lawyer was seeking "to rectify the consequences of a client’s criminal or fraudulent act in the furtherance of which the lawyer’s services have been used.”
The decision by the ABA is clearly on the wrong side of the law, AND contrary to the moral and ethical standards of society.
WHY DID THE ABA PRESENT THEIR RULES TO THE STATE SUPREME COURTS TO ELEVATE INTO LAW KNOWING THAT THEIR CONFIDENTIALITY CLAUSE WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL?
Participating in a crime, voluntarily or not, lawyers are mandated to conceal information which denies, prevents and obstructs justice. The revised Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information affect the victim's rights which are believed o be secured by the First Amendment, Fourth Amendment, Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment, Tenth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. Further, the mandated silence causes the lawyer to directly participate in the commission and furtherance of a crime, and to conceal that personal participation and involvement from all law enforcement authorities.
Seriously, the "minimum ethical standard' joke should have been the punchline. The ABA Model Rules is a code of unethical conduct, enacted into unconstitutional law, MANDATING a lawyer sacrifice personal reputation, ethics, integrity and morality. The 'minimal ethical standard' descriptor seems greatly over-exaggerated where the rules require unethical, immoral, and illegal behaviors.
THE CONTRADICTION IS OBVIOUS. ABA ETHICS ARE JUXTAPOSED
The ABA mandated unethical and immoral participation in criminal actions by attorneys which permit the commission and furtherance of a fraud and the conspiracy to conceal the crime from law enforcement and prosecution. The ABA's Rules of Professional Conduct is void of ethical considerations.
And...
But...
The American Bar Association has actually done it. The ABA has made unethical behavior a requirement within their Rules of Professional Conduct - their 'minimum ethical standard".
The unconstitutional law has been enacted by every state supreme court. It would take 25 years to find the constitutional problem. Rule 1.6 Confidentiality effectively concealed judicial corruption, injustice. The courts ignored the Rule of Law and the US Constitution without being held accountable.
The nation would quickly begin to notice that something is wrong with the US Constitution.
A President would snap that "The Constitution is just a god-damned piece of paper."
The stage was set. The fraud of the National Foreclosure Crisis began in states where the commission of fraud by lawyers within the court was kept CONFIDENTIAL. No one has been prosecuted.
| NATIONAL FORECLOSURE CRISIS - FORECLOSURE BY FRAUD The ABA lack of ethics was exploited to foreclose upon the homes of MILLIONS AND MILLIONS of Americans while constitutional rights and the Rule of Law was ignored by the court. Every level of law enforcement was prevented from action ... by a confidentiality clause. ... by an unconstitutional confidentiality clause. |
| KIDS FOR CASH - Luzerne County Pennsylvania Two judges exploit the mandate of confidentiality while receiving kickbacks for placing over 4000 children in prisons. Lawyers and judges remained silent. Complaints to the PA Supreme court were unheeded. Human Trafficking of Children in Pennsylvania. AMERICAN CHILDREN were unprotected by the US Constitution, the PA Constitution and the Rule of Law. The lawyers and EVERY level of law enforcement was prevented from action ... by a confidentiality clause. ... by an unconstitutional confidentiality clause. Until a judge contacted federal authorities violating Rule 1.6 Confidentiality. Judge Ann Lokuta was promptly removed from the bench for adversely affecting the integrity of the judiciary. Ciavarella and Coonahan had been permitted to affect the integrity of the court under an unconstitutional veil of confidentiality. |
| Civil, Criminal and Family Courts - ALL AFFECTED An act of fraud, judicial misconduct or injustice is all that is required to cause the complete loss of constitutionally protected rights for litigants in the American courts. There is no one to enforce the US Constitution where every state and federal judiciary has lost judicial independence, jurisdiction and immunity all caused by a mandate of confidentiality. Americans are unprotected by the US Constitution, the PA Constitution and the Rule of Law when every lawyer and EVERY level of law enforcement is prevented from action ... by a confidentiality clause. ... by an unconstitutional confidentiality clause. |
TREASON - A deliberate act of sedition by the American Bar Association which undermined the judiciary at state and federal levels and prevented the government from it's proper function.... executed in every state from 1984 to 2009.
DID NOT ONE OF THE 50 STATE SUPREME COURTS REVIEW THE RULES BEFORE THEY ENACTED LAW?
[COUNTERPOINT]
BUT, when a lawyer knows something is unconstitutional, they will fight for their client. They will report and expose the corruption within the judiciary.
That is a beautiful and respectable ideal which completely ignores reality.
Before the issue of corruption is heard in any court, the constitutional advocate/civil rights lawyer will be suspended from the practice of law, or disbarred, for adversely affecting the integrity of the judiciary and the reputation of lawyers.
The lawyer's personal reputation will be attacked. The lawyer's careers will be maligned. They will become disenfranchised from the community of lawyers. Those actions against the lawyer, though criminal, are considered acceptable and appropriate when exposing the truth would violate Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information - any publicity would adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary and the reputation of lawyers.
Additional events extend the same state Rule 1.6 Confidentiality Rule to include all state and federal courts... and every level of state and federal law enforcement. There seems to have been great effort has gone into assuring that an KNOWN TO BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL state law which inexplicably trumps the Rule of Law, the state Constitution and the US Constitution affects every court jurisdiction and all state and federal law enforcement.
Where the state Supreme Courts may have recognized their error, The Rule 1.6 Confidentiality clause prevents even the supreme court from addressing their own misdeed.
At every level of the courts, and law enforcement, there exists an ABA affiliated bar association and the opportunity to undermine and interfere with the course of justice. Efforts which prevent access to the courts, including forgery and issuing unsigned per curiam orders, are unexplained, omit facts, create fictions and fail to cite the applicable law. Rule 1.6 Confidentiality extends to conceal any effort action which prevent the judiciary from being adversely affected.
The Judiciary in whom the people placed their trust has become undone by the American Bar Association. The ABA has undermined the authority of the judiciary by affecting judicial independence which is an essential element for jurisdiction. The authority of the courts has been leveraged throughout the government undermining the Constitution, affecting and ignoring the overreach of the Executive, while observing the failure of the Legislative branch which is determined to accomplish nothing.
The United States Constitution needs to be rebooted.
Removing Unconstitutional Rule 1.6 is the first step it the recovery from the corruption and injustice of the last 25 years.
Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information is unconstitutional, immoral, unethical, improper, prevents, defies, conceals, undermines, usurps, destroys, overwhelms. Rule 1.6 KILLS.
Justice is coming.
Every. Person. Matters.
Saturday, September 27, 2014
Come On, Kathleen - Rule 1.6'd again?
Seems every time that Kathleen Kane is in the news she is being baited by politicians who know she must conceal crimes committed by her clients - they include the Governor, her staff - and former staff members, various state agencies, etc.
Rule 1.6 of The Rules of Professional Conduct improperly and unconstitutionally enacted by the state Supreme court is the noose which Kathleen Kane wears as an accessory every time she goes into the public eye. She's not permitted to discuss her clients crimes.
Rule 1.6 is Confidentiality of Information – an aggressively enforced mandate of silence where the information
– would affect the integrity of the judiciary,
– would reveal the misconduct of their own office,
– would expose individual liability,
– would adversely affect any client.
Kathleen Kane wears the albatross of Rule 1.6 like Oscar night jewelry... and no one notices. Kathleen Kane knows the law. Kathleen Kane won't fall into their trap. Joan Rivers wouldn't have hesitated to ask Kathleen Kane "Who's shame she is wearing."
Has Kathleen Kane finally found a way that her clients have authorized a 'release'... of their Confidential Information?
AG Kane reveals X-rated emails
Corbett, Castille press for names, details on porn e-mails
Rule 1.6 of The Rules of Professional Conduct improperly and unconstitutionally enacted by the state Supreme court is the noose which Kathleen Kane wears as an accessory every time she goes into the public eye. She's not permitted to discuss her clients crimes.
Rule 1.6 is Confidentiality of Information – an aggressively enforced mandate of silence where the information
– would affect the integrity of the judiciary,
– would reveal the misconduct of their own office,
– would expose individual liability,
– would adversely affect any client.
Kathleen Kane wears the albatross of Rule 1.6 like Oscar night jewelry... and no one notices. Kathleen Kane knows the law. Kathleen Kane won't fall into their trap. Joan Rivers wouldn't have hesitated to ask Kathleen Kane "Who's shame she is wearing."
Has Kathleen Kane finally found a way that her clients have authorized a 'release'... of their Confidential Information?
AG Kane reveals X-rated emails
Corbett, Castille press for names, details on porn e-mails
Monday, September 15, 2014
The Constitutional Crisis - The Cause and The Resolution
The Preamble to the US Constitution clearly indicates the intent and scope of the document.
The first action item on the list - ESTABLISH JUSTICE - is a necessity for the remaining actions. Without JUSTICE a government cannot insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.
The U.S. Constitution is not Dead, Dead, Dead.
JUSTICE was entrusted to the Judicial Branch which has failed to acknowledge and accept that the judiciary has been undermined by state supreme court actions which has affected every court in the country and caused the current Constitutional Crisis.
The American Bar Association presented their MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT to each state supreme court to enact into law.
BUT, WHY?
After 200 years, WHY was it necessary to enact the Model Rules into law?
Why do it quietly over 25 years? (1984 New Jersey to 2009 Maine)
The Model Rules of Professional Conduct include Rule 1.6 "Confidentiality of Information".
WITHIN THE STATE
When judicial misconduct or injustice occurs, Rule 1.6 Confidentiality triggers a denial of constitutionally protected rights to litigants without any recourse within the state, without equal or ANY protection of the law.
Attorneys General, District Attorneys, Prosecutors - Every level of law enforcement and the judiciary within the state are prohibited from action to address the corruption of the judiciary. The only exception, the Sheriffs, have been incorrectly convinced of their diminished responsibilities ... by lawyers, the Attorneys General and the courts.
WITHIN FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
When a litigant turns to the Federal Government for help, they are ignored.
By 1998 after 90% of the states had enacted the Model Rules into LAW, the McDade-Murtha Amendment (28 U.S.C. 530B) required Department of Justice staff and US Attorneys to follow the Model Rules of Professional Conduct enacted in the respective state.
WITHIN FEDERAL DISTRICT COURTS
The Federal District Courts across the country have enacted "LOCAL RULES" which require attorneys to follow the Model Rules of Professional Conduct enacted in the respective state. The Confidentiality causes a further denial of due process. Cases are summarily dismissed under improper doctrine or fictional inferences- while the court deliberately neglects to acknowledge the facts OR the denial of constitutional rights.
The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 was filed to address SPECIFICALLY AND ONLY the constitutional issue. A pre-emptive constitutional challenge of a state law which collaterally results in the loss of rights and liberties. The state courts dockets, records and actions would demonstrate the unconstitutional issue. After, the litigants could return to the state court with their previously ignored rights available to them.
The Federal District Court improperly dismissed the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 which had been filed and served on 56 United States Attorneys General.
The Federal District Court failed to certify the law being challenged with each state. Certification is a process where the federal courts request that the state supreme courts indicate if the challenged law is constitutional.
The Federal District Court Clerk neglected to certify the matter with any state. The failure to follow the federal law was ignored. The District Court Clerk is a lawyer MANDATED to Confidentiality by Rule 1.6.
INJUSTICE IGNORED BY ATTORNEYS GENERAL
EVERY ONE of the 56 United States Attorneys General failed to answer the challenge and DEFAULTED (as was appropriate and expected). Yet, the challenge was dismissed by the District Court.
The 56 state attorneys general, parties and witnesses to this injustice, did nothing. They are lawyers mandated to remain silent pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality.
No lawyer may expose the unconstitutional affect of Rule 1.6 without violating it and facing disciplinary action.
Those disciplinary actions are also kept confidential under Rule 1.6.
WITHIN FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT
The Federal Circuit Courts across the country have enacted "LOCAL RULES" which require attorneys to follow the Model Rules of Professional Conduct enacted in the respective state. The Confidentiality causes a further denial of due process constitutional rights when appeals are not handled according to the applicable law. Facts are ignored. The litigant is further denied justice without explanation which erodes justice and destroys the integrity of the judiciary.
The Federal Circuit Court affirmed the district court dismissal of the Constitutional Challenge and refused reconsideration en banc to address an issue of national importance. The careless paperwork indicated their deliberate and ADMITTED failure to address the issues raised on appeal.
ALL ON PAPER - PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY FOR THE JUDGES
The Constitutional Challenge litigants who had been denied "access to the court for redress of grievances" were never permitted the opportunity to address the federal district court or the circuit court in person.
EVERYTHING WAS DONE ON PAPER.
PER CURIAM ORDERS. ORDERS WITHOUT ORIGINAL SIGNATURES OF ANY JUDGE.
COURT DOCKETS DISAPPEARING AND UNAVAILABLE.
NO RECORD OF DISTRIBUTION OF COURT DOCUMENTS TO ALL PARTIES.
All of which could well have been written and executed by the lawyers in the court offices AND left unexplained and ignored by Rule 1.6 Confidentiality.
The actions of the judicial branch to conceal that
- their judicial independence had been compromised
- their jurisdiction was invalid and
- their integrity undermined
by a 'law' improperly and unconstitutionally enacted by each state supreme court without proper construction by any state legislature and without the signature of any Governor.
Misinformed by lawyers mandated to CONFIDENTIALITY,
- Non-Lawyer state representatives fail to act.
- Non-Lawyer state senators fail to act.
- Non-Lawyer governors fail to act.
The MANDATE of CONFIDENTIALITY prevents the state supreme courts from any corrective action.
SEDITION and TREASON
Provided by the American Bar Association and enacted by each state supreme court from 1984 (New Jersey) to 2009 (Maine), this 'law' which usurped the authority and independence of the court; caused a lack of jurisdiction; undermined the integrity of the judiciary; and had nullified the U.S. Constitution.
The American Bar Association which has affiliated organizations which exist within every level of state and federal courts AND every level of state and federal law enforcement.
American Bar Association membership includes lawyers, judges and court personnel, senators and representatives, governors and attorneys general.
THE ABA MEMBERSHIP IGNORED AND CONCEALED THE DENIAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. KEPT CONFIDENTIAL. Government Officials and 'ABA members' neglected their oath "TO PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES."
The CONFIDENTIALITY by the ABA membership has caused the Constitutional Crisis which the United States is experiencing. That CONFIDENTIALITY prevents them from actions which expose the unconstitutional law. That CONFIDENTIALITY prevents them from taking any corrective action.
WE THE PEOPLE NOTICED
The American People have noticed the government's disregard for the US Constitution.
The American People have recognized the overwhelming disinformation in the news media.
The American People have been terrorized by corruption ignored by lawyers and judges.
The American People are denied justice when lawyers are MANDATED to conceal the corruption and injustice of unconstitutional laws.
The Judicial Branch who was uniquely entrusted with JUSTICE find themselves incapable of acknowledging that they have been undermined. Rule 1.6 MANDATES that they keep their downfall CONFIDENTIAL. The MANDATE OF CONFIDENTIALITY prevents corrective action by persons mandated to follow the RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT.
The American Bar Association presented their MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT to each state supreme court to enact into law.
BUT, WHY?
After 200 years, WHY was it necessary to enact the Model Rules into law?
Why do it quietly over 25 years? (1984 New Jersey to 2009 Maine)
EXAMPLES
- The Foreclosure Crisis brought about using fraudulent and robo-signed documents affected over 40 Million people without mercy.
- Kids For Cash continued for years affecting 4000 families. There was no intervention until Judge Ann Lokuta called the FBI. FBI investigated and prosecuted. Ann Lokuta was disciplined and removed from the bench (Rule 1.6 violation).
- The destructive injustice of Family Court judges nationwide annihilates families and leads too many people to suicide.
The FBI's Operation Greylord decimated the Cook County Courthouse in Chicago. In the end—through undercover operations that used honest and very courageous judges and lawyers posing as crooked ones... and with the strong assistance of the Cook County court and local police — 92 officials had been indicted, including 17 judges, 48 lawyers, eight policemen, 10 deputy sheriffs, eight court officials, and one state legislator. Nearly all were convicted, most of them pleading guilty.
The ABA acted to make sure corruption like that was never exposed again... by making it illegal to prosecute judicial corruption and injustice... by mandating CONFIDENTIALITY.
Feeble denials that Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information does not directly indicate any MANDATE demonstrate the duplicity of the ABA actions - Each Rule includes Comments which explain the application of the rule. If you want to do something evil, do it inside something boring.... or unnecessary.
Duplicity is further exposed when people misrepresent that the state constitution ALLOWS the courts to enact the laws. THEY ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS paraphrase and fail to include the condition that the laws enacted by the courts cannot abridge the substantive rights protected by the state constitutions and the US Constitution.
INCOMPREHENSIBLE INJUSTICE FOR 30 YEARS
The refusal to acknowledge the incomprehensible amount of irreparable damage done to tens of millions of Americans is not an acceptable reason for perpetuating the injustice to Americans. A treasonous organization has deliberately and intentionally committed sedition to undermine the government of the United States. They have conspired and acted to conceal their actions by manipulating the law. They have coordinated their efforts and infiltrating every level of law enforcement. They have organized and trained their membership to continue their actions without mercy denying human rights, civil rights, constitutional rights. The same tactics which were used in Germany and lead to a Holocaust.
A CEASE AND DESIST letter was sent to the American Bar Association and every affiliated organization on August 29, 2014 with instructions to stop all operations and activities. The ABA has defiantly failed to reply or heed the letter.
ACT RESPONSIBLY
The Judiciary and Government must face responsibility for the corruption and injustice. Prosecute the corrupt and unjust.
Those who took an oath to preserve protect and defend the Constitution of the United States are now presented with the opportunity to act in accordance with their oath.
An unconstitutional state law has undermined the judicial branch of state and federal government. The repugnant law threatens and affects domestic tranquility, the common defense, the general welfare and the blessings of LIBERTY.
We the People of the United States, DEMAND THAT THE GOVERNMENT
The first action item on the list - ESTABLISH JUSTICE - is a necessity for the remaining actions. Without JUSTICE a government cannot insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.
The U.S. Constitution is not Dead, Dead, Dead.
JUSTICE was entrusted to the Judicial Branch which has failed to acknowledge and accept that the judiciary has been undermined by state supreme court actions which has affected every court in the country and caused the current Constitutional Crisis.
The American Bar Association presented their MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT to each state supreme court to enact into law.
BUT, WHY?
After 200 years, WHY was it necessary to enact the Model Rules into law?
Why do it quietly over 25 years? (1984 New Jersey to 2009 Maine)
The Model Rules of Professional Conduct include Rule 1.6 "Confidentiality of Information".
When judicial misconduct or injustice occurs, Rule 1.6 Confidentiality triggers a denial of constitutionally protected rights to litigants without any recourse within the state, without equal or ANY protection of the law.
Attorneys General, District Attorneys, Prosecutors - Every level of law enforcement and the judiciary within the state are prohibited from action to address the corruption of the judiciary. The only exception, the Sheriffs, have been incorrectly convinced of their diminished responsibilities ... by lawyers, the Attorneys General and the courts.
When a litigant turns to the Federal Government for help, they are ignored.
By 1998 after 90% of the states had enacted the Model Rules into LAW, the McDade-Murtha Amendment (28 U.S.C. 530B) required Department of Justice staff and US Attorneys to follow the Model Rules of Professional Conduct enacted in the respective state.
The Federal District Courts across the country have enacted "LOCAL RULES" which require attorneys to follow the Model Rules of Professional Conduct enacted in the respective state. The Confidentiality causes a further denial of due process. Cases are summarily dismissed under improper doctrine or fictional inferences- while the court deliberately neglects to acknowledge the facts OR the denial of constitutional rights.
The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 was filed to address SPECIFICALLY AND ONLY the constitutional issue. A pre-emptive constitutional challenge of a state law which collaterally results in the loss of rights and liberties. The state courts dockets, records and actions would demonstrate the unconstitutional issue. After, the litigants could return to the state court with their previously ignored rights available to them.
The Federal District Court improperly dismissed the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 which had been filed and served on 56 United States Attorneys General.
The Federal District Court failed to certify the law being challenged with each state. Certification is a process where the federal courts request that the state supreme courts indicate if the challenged law is constitutional.
The Federal District Court Clerk neglected to certify the matter with any state. The failure to follow the federal law was ignored. The District Court Clerk is a lawyer MANDATED to Confidentiality by Rule 1.6.
EVERY ONE of the 56 United States Attorneys General failed to answer the challenge and DEFAULTED (as was appropriate and expected). Yet, the challenge was dismissed by the District Court.
The 56 state attorneys general, parties and witnesses to this injustice, did nothing. They are lawyers mandated to remain silent pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality.
No lawyer may expose the unconstitutional affect of Rule 1.6 without violating it and facing disciplinary action.
Those disciplinary actions are also kept confidential under Rule 1.6.
The Federal Circuit Courts across the country have enacted "LOCAL RULES" which require attorneys to follow the Model Rules of Professional Conduct enacted in the respective state. The Confidentiality causes a further denial of due process constitutional rights when appeals are not handled according to the applicable law. Facts are ignored. The litigant is further denied justice without explanation which erodes justice and destroys the integrity of the judiciary.
The Federal Circuit Court affirmed the district court dismissal of the Constitutional Challenge and refused reconsideration en banc to address an issue of national importance. The careless paperwork indicated their deliberate and ADMITTED failure to address the issues raised on appeal.
The Constitutional Challenge litigants who had been denied "access to the court for redress of grievances" were never permitted the opportunity to address the federal district court or the circuit court in person.
EVERYTHING WAS DONE ON PAPER.
PER CURIAM ORDERS. ORDERS WITHOUT ORIGINAL SIGNATURES OF ANY JUDGE.
COURT DOCKETS DISAPPEARING AND UNAVAILABLE.
NO RECORD OF DISTRIBUTION OF COURT DOCUMENTS TO ALL PARTIES.
All of which could well have been written and executed by the lawyers in the court offices AND left unexplained and ignored by Rule 1.6 Confidentiality.
The actions of the judicial branch to conceal that
- their judicial independence had been compromised
- their jurisdiction was invalid and
- their integrity undermined
by a 'law' improperly and unconstitutionally enacted by each state supreme court without proper construction by any state legislature and without the signature of any Governor.
Misinformed by lawyers mandated to CONFIDENTIALITY,
- Non-Lawyer state representatives fail to act.
- Non-Lawyer state senators fail to act.
- Non-Lawyer governors fail to act.
The MANDATE of CONFIDENTIALITY prevents the state supreme courts from any corrective action.
Provided by the American Bar Association and enacted by each state supreme court from 1984 (New Jersey) to 2009 (Maine), this 'law' which usurped the authority and independence of the court; caused a lack of jurisdiction; undermined the integrity of the judiciary; and had nullified the U.S. Constitution.
The American Bar Association which has affiliated organizations which exist within every level of state and federal courts AND every level of state and federal law enforcement.
American Bar Association membership includes lawyers, judges and court personnel, senators and representatives, governors and attorneys general.
THE ABA MEMBERSHIP IGNORED AND CONCEALED THE DENIAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. KEPT CONFIDENTIAL. Government Officials and 'ABA members' neglected their oath "TO PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES."
The CONFIDENTIALITY by the ABA membership has caused the Constitutional Crisis which the United States is experiencing. That CONFIDENTIALITY prevents them from actions which expose the unconstitutional law. That CONFIDENTIALITY prevents them from taking any corrective action.
The American People have noticed the government's disregard for the US Constitution.
The American People have recognized the overwhelming disinformation in the news media.
The American People have been terrorized by corruption ignored by lawyers and judges.
The American People are denied justice when lawyers are MANDATED to conceal the corruption and injustice of unconstitutional laws.
The Judicial Branch who was uniquely entrusted with JUSTICE find themselves incapable of acknowledging that they have been undermined. Rule 1.6 MANDATES that they keep their downfall CONFIDENTIAL. The MANDATE OF CONFIDENTIALITY prevents corrective action by persons mandated to follow the RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT.
The American Bar Association presented their MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT to each state supreme court to enact into law.
BUT, WHY?
After 200 years, WHY was it necessary to enact the Model Rules into law?
Why do it quietly over 25 years? (1984 New Jersey to 2009 Maine)
- The Foreclosure Crisis brought about using fraudulent and robo-signed documents affected over 40 Million people without mercy.
- Kids For Cash continued for years affecting 4000 families. There was no intervention until Judge Ann Lokuta called the FBI. FBI investigated and prosecuted. Ann Lokuta was disciplined and removed from the bench (Rule 1.6 violation).
- The destructive injustice of Family Court judges nationwide annihilates families and leads too many people to suicide.
The FBI's Operation Greylord decimated the Cook County Courthouse in Chicago. In the end—through undercover operations that used honest and very courageous judges and lawyers posing as crooked ones... and with the strong assistance of the Cook County court and local police — 92 officials had been indicted, including 17 judges, 48 lawyers, eight policemen, 10 deputy sheriffs, eight court officials, and one state legislator. Nearly all were convicted, most of them pleading guilty.
The ABA acted to make sure corruption like that was never exposed again... by making it illegal to prosecute judicial corruption and injustice... by mandating CONFIDENTIALITY.
Feeble denials that Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information does not directly indicate any MANDATE demonstrate the duplicity of the ABA actions - Each Rule includes Comments which explain the application of the rule. If you want to do something evil, do it inside something boring.... or unnecessary.
Duplicity is further exposed when people misrepresent that the state constitution ALLOWS the courts to enact the laws. THEY ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS paraphrase and fail to include the condition that the laws enacted by the courts cannot abridge the substantive rights protected by the state constitutions and the US Constitution.
The refusal to acknowledge the incomprehensible amount of irreparable damage done to tens of millions of Americans is not an acceptable reason for perpetuating the injustice to Americans. A treasonous organization has deliberately and intentionally committed sedition to undermine the government of the United States. They have conspired and acted to conceal their actions by manipulating the law. They have coordinated their efforts and infiltrating every level of law enforcement. They have organized and trained their membership to continue their actions without mercy denying human rights, civil rights, constitutional rights. The same tactics which were used in Germany and lead to a Holocaust.
A CEASE AND DESIST letter was sent to the American Bar Association and every affiliated organization on August 29, 2014 with instructions to stop all operations and activities. The ABA has defiantly failed to reply or heed the letter.
The Judiciary and Government must face responsibility for the corruption and injustice. Prosecute the corrupt and unjust.
Those who took an oath to preserve protect and defend the Constitution of the United States are now presented with the opportunity to act in accordance with their oath.
The US Constitution REQUIRES some preserving, protecting and defending.
An unconstitutional state law has undermined the judicial branch of state and federal government. The repugnant law threatens and affects domestic tranquility, the common defense, the general welfare and the blessings of LIBERTY.
We the People of the United States, DEMAND THAT THE GOVERNMENT
1. RE-ESTABLISH JUSTICE
2. insure domestic Tranquility,
3. provide for the common defense,
4. promote the general Welfare, and
5. secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity,
returning to the principles established in the Constitution for the United States of America.
America Rebirth Tour
Constitution Day Celebration
September 17, 2014
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
We believe in "The Oath of Allegiance to America"
We believe in "One nation under God with liberty and justice for all"
We believe that "In God we trust"
We believe in "The Declaration of Independence"
We believe in "The Constitution of the United States of America"
The Preamble to the US Constitution clearly indicates the intent and scope of the document.
The first action item on the list - ESTABLISH JUSTICE - is a necessity for the remaining actions. Without JUSTICE a government cannot insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.
The U.S. Constitution is not Dead, Dead, Dead.
JUSTICE was entrusted to the Judicial Branch which has failed to acknowledge and accept that the judiciary has been undermined by state supreme court actions which has affected every court in the country and caused the current Constitutional Crisis.
The American Bar Association presented their MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT to each state supreme court to enact into law.
BUT, WHY?
After 200 years, WHY was it necessary to enact the Model Rules into law?
Why do it quietly over 25 years? (1984 New Jersey to 2009 Maine)
The Model Rules of Professional Conduct include Rule 1.6 "Confidentiality of Information".
WITHIN THE STATE
When judicial misconduct or injustice occurs, Rule 1.6 Confidentiality triggers a denial of constitutionally protected rights to litigants without any recourse within the state, without equal or ANY protection of the law.
Attorneys General, District Attorneys, Prosecutors - Every level of law enforcement and the judiciary within the state are prohibited from action to address the corruption of the judiciary. The only exception, the Sheriffs, have been incorrectly convinced of their diminished responsibilities ... by lawyers, the Attorneys General and the courts.
WITHIN FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
When a litigant turns to the Federal Government for help, they are ignored.
By 1998 after 90% of the states had enacted the Model Rules into LAW, the McDade-Murtha Amendment (28 U.S.C. 530B) required Department of Justice staff and US Attorneys to follow the Model Rules of Professional Conduct enacted in the respective state.
WITHIN FEDERAL DISTRICT COURTS
The Federal District Courts across the country have enacted "LOCAL RULES" which require attorneys to follow the Model Rules of Professional Conduct enacted in the respective state. The Confidentiality causes a further denial of due process. Cases are summarily dismissed under improper doctrine or fictional inferences- while the court deliberately neglects to acknowledge the facts OR the denial of constitutional rights.
The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 was filed to address SPECIFICALLY AND ONLY the constitutional issue. A pre-emptive constitutional challenge of a state law which collaterally results in the loss of rights and liberties. The state courts dockets, records and actions would demonstrate the unconstitutional issue. After, the litigants could return to the state court with their previously ignored rights available to them.
The Federal District Court improperly dismissed the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 which had been filed and served on 56 United States Attorneys General.
The Federal District Court failed to certify the law being challenged with each state. Certification is a process where the federal courts request that the state supreme courts indicate if the challenged law is constitutional.
The Federal District Court Clerk neglected to certify the matter with any state. The failure to follow the federal law was ignored. The District Court Clerk is a lawyer MANDATED to Confidentiality by Rule 1.6.
INJUSTICE IGNORED BY ATTORNEYS GENERAL
EVERY ONE of the 56 United States Attorneys General failed to answer the challenge and DEFAULTED (as was appropriate and expected). Yet, the challenge was dismissed by the District Court.
The 56 state attorneys general, parties and witnesses to this injustice, did nothing. They are lawyers mandated to remain silent pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality.
No lawyer may expose the unconstitutional affect of Rule 1.6 without violating it and facing disciplinary action.
Those disciplinary actions are also kept confidential under Rule 1.6.
WITHIN FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT
The Federal Circuit Courts across the country have enacted "LOCAL RULES" which require attorneys to follow the Model Rules of Professional Conduct enacted in the respective state. The Confidentiality causes a further denial of due process constitutional rights when appeals are not handled according to the applicable law. Facts are ignored. The litigant is further denied justice without explanation which erodes justice and destroys the integrity of the judiciary.
The Federal Circuit Court affirmed the district court dismissal of the Constitutional Challenge and refused reconsideration en banc to address an issue of national importance. The careless paperwork indicated their deliberate and ADMITTED failure to address the issues raised on appeal.
ALL ON PAPER - PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY FOR THE JUDGES
The Constitutional Challenge litigants who had been denied "access to the court for redress of grievances" were never permitted the opportunity to address the federal district court or the circuit court in person.
EVERYTHING WAS DONE ON PAPER.
PER CURIAM ORDERS. ORDERS WITHOUT ORIGINAL SIGNATURES OF ANY JUDGE.
COURT DOCKETS DISAPPEARING AND UNAVAILABLE.
NO RECORD OF DISTRIBUTION OF COURT DOCUMENTS TO ALL PARTIES.
All of which could well have been written and executed by the lawyers in the court offices AND left unexplained and ignored by Rule 1.6 Confidentiality.
The actions of the judicial branch to conceal that
- their judicial independence had been compromised
- their jurisdiction was invalid and
- their integrity undermined
by a 'law' improperly and unconstitutionally enacted by each state supreme court without proper construction by any state legislature and without the signature of any Governor.
Misinformed by lawyers mandated to CONFIDENTIALITY,
- Non-Lawyer state representatives fail to act.
- Non-Lawyer state senators fail to act.
- Non-Lawyer governors fail to act.
The MANDATE of CONFIDENTIALITY prevents the state supreme courts from any corrective action.
SEDITION and TREASON
Provided by the American Bar Association and enacted by each state supreme court from 1984 (New Jersey) to 2009 (Maine), this 'law' which usurped the authority and independence of the court; caused a lack of jurisdiction; undermined the integrity of the judiciary; and had nullified the U.S. Constitution.
The American Bar Association which has affiliated organizations which exist within every level of state and federal courts AND every level of state and federal law enforcement.
American Bar Association membership includes lawyers, judges and court personnel, senators and representatives, governors and attorneys general.
THE ABA MEMBERSHIP IGNORED AND CONCEALED THE DENIAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. KEPT CONFIDENTIAL. Government Officials and 'ABA members' neglected their oath "TO PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES."
The CONFIDENTIALITY by the ABA membership has caused the Constitutional Crisis which the United States is experiencing. That CONFIDENTIALITY prevents them from actions which expose the unconstitutional law. That CONFIDENTIALITY prevents them from taking any corrective action.
WE THE PEOPLE NOTICED
The American People have noticed the government's disregard for the US Constitution.
The American People have recognized the overwhelming disinformation in the news media.
The American People have been terrorized by corruption ignored by lawyers and judges.
The American People are denied justice when lawyers are MANDATED to conceal the corruption and injustice of unconstitutional laws.
The Judicial Branch who was uniquely entrusted with JUSTICE find themselves incapable of acknowledging that they have been undermined. Rule 1.6 MANDATES that they keep their downfall CONFIDENTIAL. The MANDATE OF CONFIDENTIALITY prevents corrective action by persons mandated to follow the RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT.
The American Bar Association presented their MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT to each state supreme court to enact into law.
BUT, WHY?
After 200 years, WHY was it necessary to enact the Model Rules into law?
Why do it quietly over 25 years? (1984 New Jersey to 2009 Maine)
EXAMPLES
- The Foreclosure Crisis brought about using fraudulent and robo-signed documents affected over 40 Million people without mercy.
- Kids For Cash continued for years affecting 4000 families. There was no intervention until Judge Ann Lokuta called the FBI. FBI investigated and prosecuted. Ann Lokuta was disciplined and removed from the bench (Rule 1.6 violation).
- The destructive injustice of Family Court judges nationwide annihilates families and leads too many people to suicide.
The FBI's Operation Greylord decimated the Cook County Courthouse in Chicago. In the end—through undercover operations that used honest and very courageous judges and lawyers posing as crooked ones... and with the strong assistance of the Cook County court and local police — 92 officials had been indicted, including 17 judges, 48 lawyers, eight policemen, 10 deputy sheriffs, eight court officials, and one state legislator. Nearly all were convicted, most of them pleading guilty.
The ABA acted to make sure corruption like that was never exposed again... by making it illegal to prosecute judicial corruption and injustice... by mandating CONFIDENTIALITY.
Feeble denials that Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information does not directly indicate any MANDATE demonstrate the duplicity of the ABA actions - Each Rule includes Comments which explain the application of the rule. If you want to do something evil, do it inside something boring.... or unnecessary.
Duplicity is further exposed when people misrepresent that the state constitution ALLOWS the courts to enact the laws. THEY ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS paraphrase and fail to include the condition that the laws enacted by the courts cannot abridge the substantive rights protected by the state constitutions and the US Constitution.
INCOMPREHENSIBLE INJUSTICE FOR 30 YEARS
The refusal to acknowledge the incomprehensible amount of irreparable damage done to tens of millions of Americans is not an acceptable reason for perpetuating the injustice to Americans. A treasonous organization has deliberately and intentionally committed sedition to undermine the government of the United States. They have conspired and acted to conceal their actions by manipulating the law. They have coordinated their efforts and infiltrating every level of law enforcement. They have organized and trained their membership to continue their actions without mercy denying human rights, civil rights, constitutional rights. The same tactics which were used in Germany and lead to a Holocaust.
A CEASE AND DESIST letter was sent to the American Bar Association and every affiliated organization on August 29, 2014 with instructions to stop all operations and activities. The ABA has defiantly failed to reply or heed the letter.
ACT RESPONSIBLY
The Judiciary and Government must face responsibility for the corruption and injustice. Prosecute the corrupt and unjust.
Those who took an oath to preserve protect and defend the Constitution of the United States are now presented with the opportunity to act in accordance with their oath.
An unconstitutional state law has undermined the judicial branch of state and federal government. The repugnant law threatens and affects domestic tranquility, the common defense, the general welfare and the blessings of LIBERTY.
We the People of the United States, DEMAND THAT THE GOVERNMENT
September 17, 2014
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
We believe in "The Oath of Allegiance to America"
We believe in "One nation under God with liberty and justice for all"
We believe that "In God we trust"
We believe in "The Declaration of Independence"
We believe in "The Constitution of the United States of America"
The Preamble to the US Constitution clearly indicates the intent and scope of the document.
The first action item on the list - ESTABLISH JUSTICE - is a necessity for the remaining actions. Without JUSTICE a government cannot insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.
The U.S. Constitution is not Dead, Dead, Dead.
JUSTICE was entrusted to the Judicial Branch which has failed to acknowledge and accept that the judiciary has been undermined by state supreme court actions which has affected every court in the country and caused the current Constitutional Crisis.
The American Bar Association presented their MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT to each state supreme court to enact into law.
BUT, WHY?
After 200 years, WHY was it necessary to enact the Model Rules into law?
Why do it quietly over 25 years? (1984 New Jersey to 2009 Maine)
The Model Rules of Professional Conduct include Rule 1.6 "Confidentiality of Information".
When judicial misconduct or injustice occurs, Rule 1.6 Confidentiality triggers a denial of constitutionally protected rights to litigants without any recourse within the state, without equal or ANY protection of the law.
Attorneys General, District Attorneys, Prosecutors - Every level of law enforcement and the judiciary within the state are prohibited from action to address the corruption of the judiciary. The only exception, the Sheriffs, have been incorrectly convinced of their diminished responsibilities ... by lawyers, the Attorneys General and the courts.
When a litigant turns to the Federal Government for help, they are ignored.
By 1998 after 90% of the states had enacted the Model Rules into LAW, the McDade-Murtha Amendment (28 U.S.C. 530B) required Department of Justice staff and US Attorneys to follow the Model Rules of Professional Conduct enacted in the respective state.
The Federal District Courts across the country have enacted "LOCAL RULES" which require attorneys to follow the Model Rules of Professional Conduct enacted in the respective state. The Confidentiality causes a further denial of due process. Cases are summarily dismissed under improper doctrine or fictional inferences- while the court deliberately neglects to acknowledge the facts OR the denial of constitutional rights.
The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 was filed to address SPECIFICALLY AND ONLY the constitutional issue. A pre-emptive constitutional challenge of a state law which collaterally results in the loss of rights and liberties. The state courts dockets, records and actions would demonstrate the unconstitutional issue. After, the litigants could return to the state court with their previously ignored rights available to them.
The Federal District Court improperly dismissed the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 which had been filed and served on 56 United States Attorneys General.
The Federal District Court failed to certify the law being challenged with each state. Certification is a process where the federal courts request that the state supreme courts indicate if the challenged law is constitutional.
The Federal District Court Clerk neglected to certify the matter with any state. The failure to follow the federal law was ignored. The District Court Clerk is a lawyer MANDATED to Confidentiality by Rule 1.6.
EVERY ONE of the 56 United States Attorneys General failed to answer the challenge and DEFAULTED (as was appropriate and expected). Yet, the challenge was dismissed by the District Court.
The 56 state attorneys general, parties and witnesses to this injustice, did nothing. They are lawyers mandated to remain silent pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality.
No lawyer may expose the unconstitutional affect of Rule 1.6 without violating it and facing disciplinary action.
Those disciplinary actions are also kept confidential under Rule 1.6.
The Federal Circuit Courts across the country have enacted "LOCAL RULES" which require attorneys to follow the Model Rules of Professional Conduct enacted in the respective state. The Confidentiality causes a further denial of due process constitutional rights when appeals are not handled according to the applicable law. Facts are ignored. The litigant is further denied justice without explanation which erodes justice and destroys the integrity of the judiciary.
The Federal Circuit Court affirmed the district court dismissal of the Constitutional Challenge and refused reconsideration en banc to address an issue of national importance. The careless paperwork indicated their deliberate and ADMITTED failure to address the issues raised on appeal.
The Constitutional Challenge litigants who had been denied "access to the court for redress of grievances" were never permitted the opportunity to address the federal district court or the circuit court in person.
EVERYTHING WAS DONE ON PAPER.
PER CURIAM ORDERS. ORDERS WITHOUT ORIGINAL SIGNATURES OF ANY JUDGE.
COURT DOCKETS DISAPPEARING AND UNAVAILABLE.
NO RECORD OF DISTRIBUTION OF COURT DOCUMENTS TO ALL PARTIES.
All of which could well have been written and executed by the lawyers in the court offices AND left unexplained and ignored by Rule 1.6 Confidentiality.
The actions of the judicial branch to conceal that
- their judicial independence had been compromised
- their jurisdiction was invalid and
- their integrity undermined
by a 'law' improperly and unconstitutionally enacted by each state supreme court without proper construction by any state legislature and without the signature of any Governor.
Misinformed by lawyers mandated to CONFIDENTIALITY,
- Non-Lawyer state representatives fail to act.
- Non-Lawyer state senators fail to act.
- Non-Lawyer governors fail to act.
The MANDATE of CONFIDENTIALITY prevents the state supreme courts from any corrective action.
Provided by the American Bar Association and enacted by each state supreme court from 1984 (New Jersey) to 2009 (Maine), this 'law' which usurped the authority and independence of the court; caused a lack of jurisdiction; undermined the integrity of the judiciary; and had nullified the U.S. Constitution.
The American Bar Association which has affiliated organizations which exist within every level of state and federal courts AND every level of state and federal law enforcement.
American Bar Association membership includes lawyers, judges and court personnel, senators and representatives, governors and attorneys general.
THE ABA MEMBERSHIP IGNORED AND CONCEALED THE DENIAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. KEPT CONFIDENTIAL. Government Officials and 'ABA members' neglected their oath "TO PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES."
The CONFIDENTIALITY by the ABA membership has caused the Constitutional Crisis which the United States is experiencing. That CONFIDENTIALITY prevents them from actions which expose the unconstitutional law. That CONFIDENTIALITY prevents them from taking any corrective action.
The American People have noticed the government's disregard for the US Constitution.
The American People have recognized the overwhelming disinformation in the news media.
The American People have been terrorized by corruption ignored by lawyers and judges.
The American People are denied justice when lawyers are MANDATED to conceal the corruption and injustice of unconstitutional laws.
The Judicial Branch who was uniquely entrusted with JUSTICE find themselves incapable of acknowledging that they have been undermined. Rule 1.6 MANDATES that they keep their downfall CONFIDENTIAL. The MANDATE OF CONFIDENTIALITY prevents corrective action by persons mandated to follow the RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT.
The American Bar Association presented their MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT to each state supreme court to enact into law.
BUT, WHY?
After 200 years, WHY was it necessary to enact the Model Rules into law?
Why do it quietly over 25 years? (1984 New Jersey to 2009 Maine)
- The Foreclosure Crisis brought about using fraudulent and robo-signed documents affected over 40 Million people without mercy.
- Kids For Cash continued for years affecting 4000 families. There was no intervention until Judge Ann Lokuta called the FBI. FBI investigated and prosecuted. Ann Lokuta was disciplined and removed from the bench (Rule 1.6 violation).
- The destructive injustice of Family Court judges nationwide annihilates families and leads too many people to suicide.
The FBI's Operation Greylord decimated the Cook County Courthouse in Chicago. In the end—through undercover operations that used honest and very courageous judges and lawyers posing as crooked ones... and with the strong assistance of the Cook County court and local police — 92 officials had been indicted, including 17 judges, 48 lawyers, eight policemen, 10 deputy sheriffs, eight court officials, and one state legislator. Nearly all were convicted, most of them pleading guilty.
The ABA acted to make sure corruption like that was never exposed again... by making it illegal to prosecute judicial corruption and injustice... by mandating CONFIDENTIALITY.
Feeble denials that Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information does not directly indicate any MANDATE demonstrate the duplicity of the ABA actions - Each Rule includes Comments which explain the application of the rule. If you want to do something evil, do it inside something boring.... or unnecessary.
Duplicity is further exposed when people misrepresent that the state constitution ALLOWS the courts to enact the laws. THEY ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS paraphrase and fail to include the condition that the laws enacted by the courts cannot abridge the substantive rights protected by the state constitutions and the US Constitution.
The refusal to acknowledge the incomprehensible amount of irreparable damage done to tens of millions of Americans is not an acceptable reason for perpetuating the injustice to Americans. A treasonous organization has deliberately and intentionally committed sedition to undermine the government of the United States. They have conspired and acted to conceal their actions by manipulating the law. They have coordinated their efforts and infiltrating every level of law enforcement. They have organized and trained their membership to continue their actions without mercy denying human rights, civil rights, constitutional rights. The same tactics which were used in Germany and lead to a Holocaust.
A CEASE AND DESIST letter was sent to the American Bar Association and every affiliated organization on August 29, 2014 with instructions to stop all operations and activities. The ABA has defiantly failed to reply or heed the letter.
The Judiciary and Government must face responsibility for the corruption and injustice. Prosecute the corrupt and unjust.
Those who took an oath to preserve protect and defend the Constitution of the United States are now presented with the opportunity to act in accordance with their oath.
The US Constitution REQUIRES some preserving, protecting and defending.
An unconstitutional state law has undermined the judicial branch of state and federal government. The repugnant law threatens and affects domestic tranquility, the common defense, the general welfare and the blessings of LIBERTY.
We the People of the United States, DEMAND THAT THE GOVERNMENT
1. RE-ESTABLISH JUSTICE
2. insure domestic Tranquility,
3. provide for the common defense,
4. promote the general Welfare, and
5. secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity,
returning to the principles established in the Constitution for the United States of America.
Tuesday, June 24, 2014
MANDATORY Judicial Corruption is NOT FUNNY
The tag line of this new television sitcom is UPHOLDING THE RULES BY DAY. BREAKING THEM BY NIGHT.
There is a major flaw in that line. The courts are NOT upholding any rules. The American judicial system is broken. There is nothing funny about the injustice in America.
The American courts are NOT upholding the rules, laws, procedures or constitutions. The arrogance and disdain of the judges who don't even pretend to follow law, ethics, morals, etc... The judges need not be concerned... their injustice will be ignored on appeal and escalation. The judges can 'make shit up' and violate every procedure to prevent their crime from being exposed.
The essence of the judiciary is their integrity and reputation.
Judicial integrity is mandated.
Judicial integrity may not be corrupted or adversely affected.
That is LAW.
A law the judges wrote for themselves.
The People want and expect a judiciary with integrity.
You do not obtain integrity
- by ignoring the judiciary's complete lack of integrity.
- by law that the integrity of the courts may not be impeached.
- by enacting laws which prevent exposure or prosecution of judicial corruption
- by creative interpretation of the US Constitution,
- by making people call judges 'YOUR HONOR' when truthfully they lack honor and have no shame in demonstrating it.
The judiciary is fully self-aware and informed YET continues to ignore the constitutional mandate of the judicial branch. A court majority is impervious to arguments about its proper behavior.
The American courts are in a tailspin in every state... yet, no one is doing anything except watching and pointing it out.
KIDS FOR CASH: A judge denied constitutionally protected rights of children, sent the kids to jail in a kickback scheme, destroyed their young lives, crushed their families, while the lawyers and district attorney and public defenders and attorneys general DID NOTHING. Further, THEY FAILED TO EXPLAIN WHY THEY WERE UNABLE TO DO ANYTHING. THIS WENT ON FOR YEARS AND YEARS AFFECTING THOUSANDS.
THE REASON: A law which mandates CONFIDENTIALITY also mandated confidentiality of the application of the law. The Rule is called CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION. Same rule. Same number 1.6 Same title. EVERY STATE. Rolled out over 20 years, starting in the mid-80's.
Once a litigant was the victim of judicial injustice, their basic rights were lost. They did NOT have equal protection under the law. There was no liberty and justice. There is no escaping further injustice.
FORECLOSURES: MILLIONS of people discovered the loss of their rights through unlawful and fraudulent foreclosure actions. They still are losing their homes every day. Once the injustice starts, the courts just ruin you without mercy. Suicide is the more humane option when facing this type of terroristic attack on every aspect of your life through fraudulent litigation and deliberate injustice.
No one has been prosecuted in the Foreclosure Crisis. WHY? Confidentiality of Information requires the corruption and injustice delivered by the courts to be suppressed and ignored without explanation.
The robo-signed and fake deeds presented to the court; the false business names utilized by lawyers who refused to identify their client (a plaintiff without standing), THE FRAUD UPON THE COURT which lead to the loss of family homes nationwide by the millions was NOT addressed by any court. The law was ignored in the courts and on appeal. The Courts failure to address their injustice caused the cases to grow exponentially. Any lawyer who wanted to steal ANY house only needed to file with the courts. It did not even matter if the victim had no mortgage. The judiciary became so complacent that they ignored facts, crimes, misleading financial information, fraud, etc...
When the judges recognized that their integrity was suffering because of their injustice, the Legislatures created a mandatory mediation process to prevent the cases from getting before a court. The lawyers could now terrorize people and steal homes without involving the court and hurting the integrity of the court.
The court did not respect the victim, the victim's rights or the law. The court did not respect itself demonstrating a failure of ethics, morality and any humanity or empathy. The court addressed their integrity issue - while taking no action which could increase their integrity. The courts removed themselves allowing the foreclosures to continue through outside mediation where facts were still a non-essential element.
The courts permitted the lawyers to cause financial havoc by foreclosure fraud in the courtroom, outside the courtroom, while denying equal protection of the law, and obstructing and preventing prosecution of the crime because of a mandate to protect the integrity of the courts. No one ever explained it. There is a reason no one was prosecuted for the fraud. The MANDATE for CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION had been silently concealing injustice and corruption since the mid-80's. The number of victims had grown to the point where the tactic of isolation by poverty was no longer effective. The mandate of silence continued to protect the integrity of a judiciary which failed the American people. Judicial arrogance without shame. The only believer in justice was the victim who had no choice but to hope and not to despair.
The judiciary violated the public trust, ignored the US Constitution and state constitutions and MANDATED the silent participation of every judge, every lawyer, every court.
The lawyers in the US Congress and the state legislatures must remain silent, too.
The non-lawyers speak out about the injustices and nothing ever gets fixed.
The non-Lawyers informed about the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 are instructed by the lawyers to SHUT UP. They further suggest that the revelation of the judiciary's sedition would undermine American society. The continued abuse of judicial authority undermines the American government every day.
Continuing the crime and injustice of the judiciary undermines American society and the human and civil rights of every American. It was NOT always this way... there used to be the proverbial 'good ole boys' network that ignored the occasional corruption in a discretionary manner.
WHICH IS AGGRESSIVELY ENFORCED BY THE COURTS
WHICH REQUIRES THE PARTICIPATION OF EVERY COURT
AND EVERY LEVEL OF LAW ENFORCEMENT - Lawyers, District Attorneys, Attorneys General
The court addressed their responsibility for the shift from a discretionary participation to a MANDATORY participation in their injustice? Further injustice and denial of rights. Financial ruin. Destroying their victim because their victim survives and MUST return to the court for justice. There can be no denying the deliberate motivation and intent of the judiciary when the actions of the court defy law, procedure or explanation.
The court cannot tell you why THEY are mistreating you and addressing your survival of their injustice with contempt because THE COURT MANDATED IT TO BE KEPT CONFIDENTIAL. Your lawyer is also obligated NOT to inform you. Your lawyer may NOT take any action to address the courts denial of your constitutional rights without facing disciplinary action. If you sue your lawyer, the courts will cover for the lawyer who was covering for the court. The courts have no integrity - to console themselves they destroy other people's integrity. Broken, right?
This deliberate and intentional law designed to corrupt, usurp and undermine the american government through the judicial branch is undeniable. The malice and terror inflicted on the victims of judicial injustice is unspeakable - because the courts won't listen, and they have mandated everyone in law enforcement to silence. Any lawyer who attempts to reveal the issue is swiftly disciplined, suspended or disbarred... AND, they take Rule 1.6 to the grave and beyond.
For proof that the courts are acting with malice aforethought and deliberate intent to undermine the US Constitution, the actions of the courts to diminish the authority of the only Law Enforcement Authority who is NOT required to follow the Rules of Professional Conduct - Rule 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION. The participation of the county District Attorney, the usurper of the constitutional authority of the sheriff, misleads, distracts obstructs and prevents the sheriff from enforcing the law. Case law is application/misapplication of law by the court. CASE LAW IS NOT LAW.
| The necessity of misleading the sheriffs out of their constitutional authority. |
There is no doubt that we live today under an altered constitutional regime, where the rules are no longer supplied by a written document but by courts defining the powers of government ad hoc, through their own case law.
This profound change from our previous order of government is hidden by political and judicial rhetoric that give honor to and even cites the written constitution. It is further obscured by the fact that this new regime was not ratified by amendment or constitutional convention.
Where a real constitutional right of one person is being violated with the unanimous apathy of the rest of the United States, that right must be vindicated. No amount or length of majority inertia can legitimate what the courts are doing to that right.
Friday, May 23, 2014
The Constitutional Crisis in the US
There have been many groups attempting to address the constitutional crisis in the United States. Their approaches include the following:
Civil Disobediance
Constitutional Conventions
Court Reforms
Revolution
Enacting New Laws
Grand Juries
Unfortunately, the same problem which is causing the crisis prevents those approaches from being successful.
Where a national approach is necessary, Americans are very apathetic when it comes to their rights. Those who are unaware that they have lost their rights are content to ignore the people who have lost their rights.
Once you experience a loss of rights, you will be forced to turn to the very courts which deny your rights for a resolution. A court where no one will acknowledge your loss of rights. A Court where the issue is ignored with a deliberate silence that overwhelms the matter.
The best definition I have found for the victim of this type of inescapable loss of rights is...
Those in govt did not expect proactive attempts at a resolution. This may be why the government is trying to get guns off the streets while seemingly preparing for a sort of martial law in every community.
The government never expected anyone to find the needle in the haystack of injustice.
It was a necessity in my case. I needed to find out why the courts and every level of law enforcement failed to address the denial of my constitutional rights while annihilating every aspect of my life in the process. The injustice continually delivered by the 20 judges over the course of my court appearances since 2007.
Nationally, 30 years of denial of constitutional rights could come to an end.
Once I knew the problem, everyone's failure to take action on my behalf was clear. I had an explanation. FINALLY.
ONE LAW. Enacted by the Supreme Courts in each state. IS THE SOURCE OF THE PROBLEM. Same 'law' in every state. Same number. Same Name. Rule 1.6 - Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct.
Rule 1.6 makes it illegal for a lawyer to address the problem. I am not a lawyer.
Rule 1.6 makes it illegal for a state Attorney General to address the problem. They are lawyers mandated to follow the rule or face disciplinary action... disciplinary action is swift to occur and deliberately intended to prevent exposure of the unconstitutional 'law'. Disciplinary proceedings are kept CONFIDENTIAL.
The 'law' in place makes it illegal for the state Supreme Courts to fix the problem the state Supreme courts caused when they enacted the 'law'.
The 'law' in place makes it illegal for lawyers within the legislature to fix the problem caused when the state Supreme Courts enacted the 'law'.
Truth be told, Most lawyers just accept it and had no idea what caused the constitutional crisis.
Lawyers who knew the effect were the same lawyers who foreclosed on millions of Americans and threw people out of their homes. An act of judicial misconduct or fraud upon the court was all that was required to cause the loss of rights. Fraudulent robo-signed documents served to the court.
The DOJ and the Courts (every level of the Courts) were all aware of the Constitutional Crisis. The 'law' makes it illegal for them to take any action to fix the problem.
Only one person in government would be able to lawfully address the problem. BUT, doing so would expose the active participation of every member of the judiciary and the membership of American Bar Association in the matter. Every judge and lawyer in the country.
Rule 1.6 was enacted into law starting in 1984 in New Jersey. Quietly and gradually it was enacted in every state.
When Rule 1.6 was a trade code, it was a guideline for legal professionals. HOWEVER, when enacted into law, CONFIDENTIALITY became a MANDATE for all lawyers, district attorneys and attorneys general.
When it became a mandate people experienced the denial of constitutionally protected rights and liberties. This denial was committed by the courts and the entire judiciary. Those responsible to make sure a persons rights were available to them in a courtroom were the very ones ignoring people's rights. The denial was done without mercy by those who knew their actions were unconstitutional, but the 'law' mandated the denial of those rights and liberties. An Appeal to a higher court would only cause the same results, because the courts are mandated to keep the injustice CONFIDENTIAL. Opinions from higher courts became documents of misinformation which ignored the lower courts injustice.
Any law which denies rights and privileges guaranteed by the US Constitution is a nullity. And while the judges and lawyers know this, they allowed Rule 1.6 to undermine the courts, the law and the constitution in every state.
The failure of lawyers and judges to stop the deliberate injustice demonstrates the intimidating and threatening disciplinary power of the courts conspiracy of confidentiality. The courts self-regulation disciplinary processes used to conceal the court's injustice.
THE US ATTORNEY GENERAL
The US Attorney General may not be prevented from addressing issues regarding ANY LAW in the country. Rule 1.6 does not prevent the US Attorney General from action. I think the mess is considered so massive, that the US Attorney General have opted to permit the continued injustice to occur instead of having civil unrest throughout the nation..
The only other person in the country who could lawfully address the matter is a pro se litigant (non-lawyer) who has experienced the injustice, survived the injustice, found the cause of the injustice, documented the injustice, and would have standing to address the matter in the Federal Courts. THEY NEVER ANTICIPATED THIS POSSIBILITY. It was the last place I looked. Only when it was realized that everyone who was failing to act had to directly or indirectly follow the Rules of Professional Conduct. They were lawyers or were guided by lawyers.
The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 was filed on August 8 2013 and served upon every state Attorney General.
No news media has carried the story. We tried.
The Federal Courts have deliberately acted improperly to attempt to dismiss the matter. This causes more courts to become involved in the actions to continue
The State Attorneys General failed to respond to the Summons & Challenge. Rule 1.6 mandates their silence. They defaulted.
Currently in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals with the anticipation it must go on to the US Supreme Court, the recommendation of certiori by the Third Circuit judiciary would be beneficial.
Since August 2013, you may have noticed changes in the justice system. The quick end to some injustice which has caused people to be released from jail. The government seems to be preparing to restore justice. But simply put they know that people are going to be angry. Justifiably angry.
I never imagined I'd find the fix. But like I said, I had no choice. The victims are relegated to homelessness, prison or suicide... and that was just not an option for me.
Once Rule 1.6 is out of the way, justice and the constitution and the law will be restored.
The US Judiciary has been permitted to self regulate their courts. The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 exposes that the courts betrayed the trust of the People and were unable to handle that responsibility.
Civil Disobediance
Constitutional Conventions
Court Reforms
Revolution
Enacting New Laws
Grand Juries
Unfortunately, the same problem which is causing the crisis prevents those approaches from being successful.
Where a national approach is necessary, Americans are very apathetic when it comes to their rights. Those who are unaware that they have lost their rights are content to ignore the people who have lost their rights.
Once you experience a loss of rights, you will be forced to turn to the very courts which deny your rights for a resolution. A court where no one will acknowledge your loss of rights. A Court where the issue is ignored with a deliberate silence that overwhelms the matter.
The best definition I have found for the victim of this type of inescapable loss of rights is...
| "I am a sane man dealing with an absolutely insane situation. Every person in a position to help has acted improperly in direct violation of procedures and the law preventing the resolution of any matter… they each make the situation worse… NO ONE HELPS" |
Those in govt did not expect proactive attempts at a resolution. This may be why the government is trying to get guns off the streets while seemingly preparing for a sort of martial law in every community.
The government never expected anyone to find the needle in the haystack of injustice.
It was a necessity in my case. I needed to find out why the courts and every level of law enforcement failed to address the denial of my constitutional rights while annihilating every aspect of my life in the process. The injustice continually delivered by the 20 judges over the course of my court appearances since 2007.
Nationally, 30 years of denial of constitutional rights could come to an end.
Once I knew the problem, everyone's failure to take action on my behalf was clear. I had an explanation. FINALLY.
ONE LAW. Enacted by the Supreme Courts in each state. IS THE SOURCE OF THE PROBLEM. Same 'law' in every state. Same number. Same Name. Rule 1.6 - Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct.
Rule 1.6 makes it illegal for a lawyer to address the problem. I am not a lawyer.
Rule 1.6 makes it illegal for a state Attorney General to address the problem. They are lawyers mandated to follow the rule or face disciplinary action... disciplinary action is swift to occur and deliberately intended to prevent exposure of the unconstitutional 'law'. Disciplinary proceedings are kept CONFIDENTIAL.
The 'law' in place makes it illegal for the state Supreme Courts to fix the problem the state Supreme courts caused when they enacted the 'law'.
The 'law' in place makes it illegal for lawyers within the legislature to fix the problem caused when the state Supreme Courts enacted the 'law'.
Truth be told, Most lawyers just accept it and had no idea what caused the constitutional crisis.
Lawyers who knew the effect were the same lawyers who foreclosed on millions of Americans and threw people out of their homes. An act of judicial misconduct or fraud upon the court was all that was required to cause the loss of rights. Fraudulent robo-signed documents served to the court.
The DOJ and the Courts (every level of the Courts) were all aware of the Constitutional Crisis. The 'law' makes it illegal for them to take any action to fix the problem.
Only one person in government would be able to lawfully address the problem. BUT, doing so would expose the active participation of every member of the judiciary and the membership of American Bar Association in the matter. Every judge and lawyer in the country.
Rule 1.6 was enacted into law starting in 1984 in New Jersey. Quietly and gradually it was enacted in every state.
When Rule 1.6 was a trade code, it was a guideline for legal professionals. HOWEVER, when enacted into law, CONFIDENTIALITY became a MANDATE for all lawyers, district attorneys and attorneys general.
When it became a mandate people experienced the denial of constitutionally protected rights and liberties. This denial was committed by the courts and the entire judiciary. Those responsible to make sure a persons rights were available to them in a courtroom were the very ones ignoring people's rights. The denial was done without mercy by those who knew their actions were unconstitutional, but the 'law' mandated the denial of those rights and liberties. An Appeal to a higher court would only cause the same results, because the courts are mandated to keep the injustice CONFIDENTIAL. Opinions from higher courts became documents of misinformation which ignored the lower courts injustice.
Any law which denies rights and privileges guaranteed by the US Constitution is a nullity. And while the judges and lawyers know this, they allowed Rule 1.6 to undermine the courts, the law and the constitution in every state.
The failure of lawyers and judges to stop the deliberate injustice demonstrates the intimidating and threatening disciplinary power of the courts conspiracy of confidentiality. The courts self-regulation disciplinary processes used to conceal the court's injustice.
THE US ATTORNEY GENERAL
The US Attorney General may not be prevented from addressing issues regarding ANY LAW in the country. Rule 1.6 does not prevent the US Attorney General from action. I think the mess is considered so massive, that the US Attorney General have opted to permit the continued injustice to occur instead of having civil unrest throughout the nation..
The only other person in the country who could lawfully address the matter is a pro se litigant (non-lawyer) who has experienced the injustice, survived the injustice, found the cause of the injustice, documented the injustice, and would have standing to address the matter in the Federal Courts. THEY NEVER ANTICIPATED THIS POSSIBILITY. It was the last place I looked. Only when it was realized that everyone who was failing to act had to directly or indirectly follow the Rules of Professional Conduct. They were lawyers or were guided by lawyers.
The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 was filed on August 8 2013 and served upon every state Attorney General.
No news media has carried the story. We tried.
The Federal Courts have deliberately acted improperly to attempt to dismiss the matter. This causes more courts to become involved in the actions to continue
The State Attorneys General failed to respond to the Summons & Challenge. Rule 1.6 mandates their silence. They defaulted.
Currently in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals with the anticipation it must go on to the US Supreme Court, the recommendation of certiori by the Third Circuit judiciary would be beneficial.
Since August 2013, you may have noticed changes in the justice system. The quick end to some injustice which has caused people to be released from jail. The government seems to be preparing to restore justice. But simply put they know that people are going to be angry. Justifiably angry.
I never imagined I'd find the fix. But like I said, I had no choice. The victims are relegated to homelessness, prison or suicide... and that was just not an option for me.
Once Rule 1.6 is out of the way, justice and the constitution and the law will be restored.
| When South Africa was writing their Constitution they recognized that the apartheid in South Africa was extended by the courts who falsely imprisoned civil rights activists. The courts were used to intimidate and threaten the people. The Courts were the enforcers of apartheid. South Africa's Constitution makes sure that their judiciary is the weakest and most vulnerable branch of their government. |
The US Judiciary has been permitted to self regulate their courts. The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 exposes that the courts betrayed the trust of the People and were unable to handle that responsibility.
Friday, November 22, 2013
Gary Kline, Do your job, or resign.
November 22, 2013
Gary Kline
Domestic Relations Office
P.O. Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404-0311
By facsimile (610) 239-9637.
Healy v Healy 2007-12477
PACSES 853111584
Dear Gary,
Arm of the Court? Seriously? If so, would you care to address the deliberately defective and void order as invalid? Or valid? Things which supercede the Court’s authority include the Law, Due Process, Procedure, etc… A Judge is required to have jurisdiction to issue an Order of the Court.
Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio did not have jurisdiction, therefore she was NOT acting as a judge when she knowingly issued her deliberately defective and void order of May 9, 2011.
The Domestic Relations Office has a responsibility to execute a Court Order when it is valid. When given an invalid and defective order the Domestic Relations Office has a responsibility to respond accordingly to address the defects in the order.
Your department can address the defect in the void order of May 9, 2011. Your department can schedule a hearing to address the defect. The defect is not a judgment, it is procedural. The judge lacked jurisdiction. There is no way to retroactively obtain jurisdiction. The void order is never going to be valid. Never. Ever.
You continue to evade the defect while you perpetrate the invalid order and are complicit in the deliberate corruption ordered and where the County is feigning an obligation to follow a void order while it continues to harass my life.
The Archdiocese of Philadelphia has additionally been served the void and defective order. The deliberate void and defective order continues to attack every aspect of my life.
If you wish to do the right honorable and lawful action, simply recognize the defective and void order and resume APL until the a proper and lawful order can be issued.
The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 exposes the inability of a litigant to get a hearing when an act of judicial misconduct or corruption is involved in a matter. This will explain why Court Administration has been so directly involved in denying access to the court to address the matter.
If you are an attorney who may not lawfully take any action to expose the criminal misconduct and corruption of the judiciary, you are welcome to respond that ‘Pursuant to Rule 1.6, I am unable to take the lawful actions required by my office.’
Another matter, Healy v Miller #2013-29976, also awaits scheduling by Court Administration. In that matter, the Millers are attempting to assert the same void order as a power of attorney instrument. They were the victims of fraud in an amount in excess of $400,000.00.
My personal property and possessions were disposed of as a result of the same defective and void order.
According to the information returned in Healy v Miller, there is support owed which has not been collected by the Domestic Relations Office.
You have not explained why my file is marked CONFIDENTIAL? I am aware that the file has been altered and electronic records have been deleted.
I asked for a meeting, conference or proceeding. None has been scheduled.
I asked for a review of the void and defective order. No review has been scheduled.
I asked for an explanation of the rudeness and false allegations of your staff. It has been ignored.
I am spending another Thanksgiving destitute and homeless because of the complicity of Montgomery County in concealing the corruption and defective order of May 9, 2011. I have persevered through this injustice and terror since the initial concealed act of misconduct in August 2007. The facts are clear. The law is clear. The corruption is clear.
I presume you wanted to be the Director of Domestic Relations, SO DO THE JOB… or resign.
Sincerely,
Terance Healy
cc: Montgomery County Commissioners
Josh Shapiro, Chair
Leslie S. Richards, Vice Chair
Bruce L Castor Jr, Commissioner
Gary Kline
Domestic Relations Office
P.O. Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404-0311
By facsimile (610) 239-9637.
Healy v Healy 2007-12477
PACSES 853111584
Dear Gary,
Arm of the Court? Seriously? If so, would you care to address the deliberately defective and void order as invalid? Or valid? Things which supercede the Court’s authority include the Law, Due Process, Procedure, etc… A Judge is required to have jurisdiction to issue an Order of the Court.
Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio did not have jurisdiction, therefore she was NOT acting as a judge when she knowingly issued her deliberately defective and void order of May 9, 2011.
The Domestic Relations Office has a responsibility to execute a Court Order when it is valid. When given an invalid and defective order the Domestic Relations Office has a responsibility to respond accordingly to address the defects in the order.
Your department can address the defect in the void order of May 9, 2011. Your department can schedule a hearing to address the defect. The defect is not a judgment, it is procedural. The judge lacked jurisdiction. There is no way to retroactively obtain jurisdiction. The void order is never going to be valid. Never. Ever.
You continue to evade the defect while you perpetrate the invalid order and are complicit in the deliberate corruption ordered and where the County is feigning an obligation to follow a void order while it continues to harass my life.
The Archdiocese of Philadelphia has additionally been served the void and defective order. The deliberate void and defective order continues to attack every aspect of my life.
If you wish to do the right honorable and lawful action, simply recognize the defective and void order and resume APL until the a proper and lawful order can be issued.
The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 exposes the inability of a litigant to get a hearing when an act of judicial misconduct or corruption is involved in a matter. This will explain why Court Administration has been so directly involved in denying access to the court to address the matter.
If you are an attorney who may not lawfully take any action to expose the criminal misconduct and corruption of the judiciary, you are welcome to respond that ‘Pursuant to Rule 1.6, I am unable to take the lawful actions required by my office.’
Another matter, Healy v Miller #2013-29976, also awaits scheduling by Court Administration. In that matter, the Millers are attempting to assert the same void order as a power of attorney instrument. They were the victims of fraud in an amount in excess of $400,000.00.
My personal property and possessions were disposed of as a result of the same defective and void order.
According to the information returned in Healy v Miller, there is support owed which has not been collected by the Domestic Relations Office.
You have not explained why my file is marked CONFIDENTIAL? I am aware that the file has been altered and electronic records have been deleted.
I asked for a meeting, conference or proceeding. None has been scheduled.
I asked for a review of the void and defective order. No review has been scheduled.
I asked for an explanation of the rudeness and false allegations of your staff. It has been ignored.
I am spending another Thanksgiving destitute and homeless because of the complicity of Montgomery County in concealing the corruption and defective order of May 9, 2011. I have persevered through this injustice and terror since the initial concealed act of misconduct in August 2007. The facts are clear. The law is clear. The corruption is clear.
I presume you wanted to be the Director of Domestic Relations, SO DO THE JOB… or resign.
Sincerely,
Terance Healy
cc: Montgomery County Commissioners
Josh Shapiro, Chair
Leslie S. Richards, Vice Chair
Bruce L Castor Jr, Commissioner
Friday, November 8, 2013
Sheriff Eileen Behr
Sheriff Eileen Behr
Montgomery County
Norristown, PA 19404
Sheriff Behr,
Please accept and review the attached letter to Gary Kline about an experience at the Domestic Relations Office on November 7, 2013. County Deputies continue to act on false information from Court personnel.
This issue in the DRO was addressed with Corporal Kohl yesterday. This circumstance was pointed out to he and Corporal Haas years ago. your deputies have recognized that it is the County Personnel who are acting to deny access to the court, to harass, deter and prevent information from being available. The County Personnel are misinforming and using your staff to hinder, undermine and threaten my efforts and my freedom.
I take my freedom and my liberty seriously. The survival of my experience since 2007 in the Courthouse has documented and exposed the criminal sedition of the Pennsylvania Government by judges and lawyers who are unable to address or correct their damage. I have raised the matter in the Federal Courts for myself and on behalf of those who have not survived, baited into jail, forced into homelessness, drugs, isolation and suicide.
The criminal fraudulent conveyance of my home has been documented and proven, yet there has been no action. i remain homeless. Denied access to the District Court by Court Administration. prevented from hearings by Court Administration. Why am I still homeless while the crime is ignored and my home is occupied by people without a valid title to the property. if someone stole a car or a wallet, THAT would have been returned and the crime addressed.
The criminal fraud provided to domestic Relations Office is being ignored. In the past they have denied my rights falsely indicating paperwork was not properly provided to them and served. Their own records demonstrate the files have been deleted. My file is marked CONFIDENTIAL and not available for review.
I remain homeless and destitute and continue to be terrorized and threatened by the harassment and intrusions into my life. I again request your intervention and support. Thank you as always for the professionalism of your deputies.
Sincerely
Terance Healy
Montgomery County
Norristown, PA 19404
Sheriff Behr,
Please accept and review the attached letter to Gary Kline about an experience at the Domestic Relations Office on November 7, 2013. County Deputies continue to act on false information from Court personnel.
This issue in the DRO was addressed with Corporal Kohl yesterday. This circumstance was pointed out to he and Corporal Haas years ago. your deputies have recognized that it is the County Personnel who are acting to deny access to the court, to harass, deter and prevent information from being available. The County Personnel are misinforming and using your staff to hinder, undermine and threaten my efforts and my freedom.
I take my freedom and my liberty seriously. The survival of my experience since 2007 in the Courthouse has documented and exposed the criminal sedition of the Pennsylvania Government by judges and lawyers who are unable to address or correct their damage. I have raised the matter in the Federal Courts for myself and on behalf of those who have not survived, baited into jail, forced into homelessness, drugs, isolation and suicide.
The criminal fraudulent conveyance of my home has been documented and proven, yet there has been no action. i remain homeless. Denied access to the District Court by Court Administration. prevented from hearings by Court Administration. Why am I still homeless while the crime is ignored and my home is occupied by people without a valid title to the property. if someone stole a car or a wallet, THAT would have been returned and the crime addressed.
The criminal fraud provided to domestic Relations Office is being ignored. In the past they have denied my rights falsely indicating paperwork was not properly provided to them and served. Their own records demonstrate the files have been deleted. My file is marked CONFIDENTIAL and not available for review.
I remain homeless and destitute and continue to be terrorized and threatened by the harassment and intrusions into my life. I again request your intervention and support. Thank you as always for the professionalism of your deputies.
Sincerely
Terance Healy
Thursday, November 7, 2013
Gary Kline - Domestic Relations Office
Gary Kline
Domestic Relations Division
Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas
P.O. Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404
Dear Mr. Kline
I attempted before noon today to deliver the attached letter to the Domestic Relations Office (DRO). The treatment I received at the direction of an obese clerk with blond hair and a pink blouse was inexcusable.
When I arrived I proceeded to the check-in folks and asked them to accept a letter and time stamp copies for distribution to the parties. They asked if I had a case number. It was on the letter.
When they looked into their computers, they indicated the file was CONFIDENTIAL. There has never been an explanation ffor my file being confidential. I have been denied access to the file for years without explanation.
The counter person took the letter (and copies) to the back and about 10 minutes later the woman who refused to identify herself indicated I needed to open up a new file. She refused to accept the letter or to time stamp the copies. The counter person then explained to her that I had a PACSES number already. She ignored her. I instructed her this was about delivering a letter to the DRO about an existing case, not initiating a new case.
I asked her to identify herself or contact her supervisor. She ignored me and called the deputies. She falsely indicated she had already given her name. if she had, why would I not have it? or written it? Why would I still be asking for it? Why was she calling the deputies? Why were they saying she had given me her name when they were not there? Why was the delivery of a letter causing such drama? Why was she refusing to provide her name. Even a first name would have been useful. This woman was determined, for no apparent reason, to prevent me from simply delivering a letter and having it time-stamped for distribution to the parties.
In the past no presenting a time-stamped copy of the documents filed with the Domestic Relations Office has been reason for inaction and failure to collect arrears.
As such, I would appreciate your confirmation of the receipt of the attached letter dated November 7, 2013.
I would appreciate the opportunity to review the matter with you and additionally understand why the information in my file is being prevented from me. The DRO activity was initiated on my behalf by my attorney in July 2007.
I would appreciate an opportunity to meet with you to discuss the DRO, discuss my experience, and review and obtain the file contents.
Sincerely
Terance Healy
Domestic Relations Division
Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas
P.O. Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404
Dear Mr. Kline
I attempted before noon today to deliver the attached letter to the Domestic Relations Office (DRO). The treatment I received at the direction of an obese clerk with blond hair and a pink blouse was inexcusable.
When I arrived I proceeded to the check-in folks and asked them to accept a letter and time stamp copies for distribution to the parties. They asked if I had a case number. It was on the letter.
When they looked into their computers, they indicated the file was CONFIDENTIAL. There has never been an explanation ffor my file being confidential. I have been denied access to the file for years without explanation.
The counter person took the letter (and copies) to the back and about 10 minutes later the woman who refused to identify herself indicated I needed to open up a new file. She refused to accept the letter or to time stamp the copies. The counter person then explained to her that I had a PACSES number already. She ignored her. I instructed her this was about delivering a letter to the DRO about an existing case, not initiating a new case.
I asked her to identify herself or contact her supervisor. She ignored me and called the deputies. She falsely indicated she had already given her name. if she had, why would I not have it? or written it? Why would I still be asking for it? Why was she calling the deputies? Why were they saying she had given me her name when they were not there? Why was the delivery of a letter causing such drama? Why was she refusing to provide her name. Even a first name would have been useful. This woman was determined, for no apparent reason, to prevent me from simply delivering a letter and having it time-stamped for distribution to the parties.
In the past no presenting a time-stamped copy of the documents filed with the Domestic Relations Office has been reason for inaction and failure to collect arrears.
As such, I would appreciate your confirmation of the receipt of the attached letter dated November 7, 2013.
I would appreciate the opportunity to review the matter with you and additionally understand why the information in my file is being prevented from me. The DRO activity was initiated on my behalf by my attorney in July 2007.
I would appreciate an opportunity to meet with you to discuss the DRO, discuss my experience, and review and obtain the file contents.
Sincerely
Terance Healy
Saturday, September 21, 2013
Sen. Tom Coburn: We need a constitutional convention to take back our country
Senator, the problem is that there was no lawful way to approach the crisis the country is facing.
Until 2 guys from suburban Philadelphia found the law which enabled the crisis and prevented resolution, and THEY COULD ADDRESS IT LAWFULLY. Once that law is declared by the court to be unconstitutional, a nullity, justice will be resurrected.
Pay attention to how many times you have been told about lack of jurisdiction. Rule 1.6 prevented lawful action.
"We have agencies that are rife with fraud and programs that are rife with fraud, and Congress has not done anything about it, they have agreed not to do anything about it. I think we're working too well together." Sen. Tom Coburn
We need a constitutional convention to take back our country
Senator Tom Coburn does not know that there can be no convention, because the lawyers can't repair the damage they have done. Not until we get this Rule out of the way. Anyone in the government who mentions the issues which subvert the Constitution is likely NOT a lawyer. The lawyers know that is CONFIDENTIAL, and the punishment for talking is brutal.
http://washingtonexaminer.com/sen.-tom-coburn-we-need-a-constitutional-convention-to-take-back-our-country/article/2534671
Until 2 guys from suburban Philadelphia found the law which enabled the crisis and prevented resolution, and THEY COULD ADDRESS IT LAWFULLY. Once that law is declared by the court to be unconstitutional, a nullity, justice will be resurrected.
Pay attention to how many times you have been told about lack of jurisdiction. Rule 1.6 prevented lawful action.
"We have agencies that are rife with fraud and programs that are rife with fraud, and Congress has not done anything about it, they have agreed not to do anything about it. I think we're working too well together." Sen. Tom Coburn
We need a constitutional convention to take back our country
Senator Tom Coburn does not know that there can be no convention, because the lawyers can't repair the damage they have done. Not until we get this Rule out of the way. Anyone in the government who mentions the issues which subvert the Constitution is likely NOT a lawyer. The lawyers know that is CONFIDENTIAL, and the punishment for talking is brutal.
http://washingtonexaminer.com/sen.-tom-coburn-we-need-a-constitutional-convention-to-take-back-our-country/article/2534671
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)