The previous post about the Pennsylvania District Attorneys started out 'light' - some humor at the grand drama. Lady with a crazy face asking if they had no self recognition or perception... and it finished with a breakdown of the District Attorneys who have failed me personally. It was through their inaction that I realized the loss of any protections under the law. Every crime reported to the township police, the county detectives, or the DA's office was ignored outright OR the response was that their boss instructed them to do nothing.
There was no doubt about the crimes. BUT, they would not say any reason for NOT investigating/prosecuting. Car theft, identity theft, custody violations, burglary - involving minor children, computer intrusions, home intrusions, private investigators, fraud, false allegations to police, ... and more. ALL committed against me and IGNORED at the direction of the District Attorney.
The reports of corruption and constitutional violations of several judges when reported to township police went nowhere. The evidence of the court documents PROVING their crimes were ignored because that person is a judge and if a cop takes the complaint, the judge will retaliate. Yes, I understand that, they are retaliating against me for surviving their retaliation.
has undermined the judiciary and usurped their authority
while mandating confidentiality and excusing fraud to prevent exposure.
Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information.
I have no admiration for Risa Ferman. I find her involvement with childrens aid organizations a potential for conflict of interest involving human trafficking and placing children in jeopardy. As a judge, she would have more ability to conceal lawlessness and corruption. Her record indicates failure to enforce the law while concealing judicial corruption. Why would she be any different with MORE power and less oversight? Her failures since 2008, demonstrates no understanding of good and bad, right and wrong and selective disregard for constitutional rights and the rule of law.The District Attorneys usurped the authority of the Sheriff - the Chief Law Enforcement Officer in the County - and began referring to themselves as Chief Law Enforcement Professional in the County. The authority of the Sheriff was diminished out of necessity. The Sheriff was the only non-lawyer in law enforcement with authority to investigate and arrest - their jurisdiction pre-dates the constitutions and is only affected when specifically indicated within a law that the sheriff has restrictions or limitations regarding enforcement. Otherwise, The Chief Law Enforcement Officer has full authority while relegated to transporting prisoners and guarding the hostages who occupy the bench. They need protection because they have no independence, no jurisdiction, no power, BUT still present the illusions while denying justice without explanation.
It was easy and discreet to convince the Sheriffs of diminished authority than to re-write every law, or amend the constitution. November 25, 1997, the Attorney General informed the sheriffs. There were cases brought to courts where case law was misrepresented to substantiate the ruling - THAT then became the cited case. The Judiciary decides what the constitution does and does not mean - they are permitted to error. This time because it was necessary to remove the last remaining non-lawyer with any authority from law enforcement. Where the judiciary could not remove the corrupting law without violating it, they concealed it.
Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information
Rule 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION controls and maintains the non-disclosure and silence of lawyers and legal professionals. It does so without regard for the effect on the constitutional rights of litigants without obligation to abide by the law while its collateral effect prevents disclosure, mandates confidentiality and excuses fraud to conceal fraud to conceal fraud... all confidential to them, while known to the litigant, they are obligated to IGNORE..
Once a victim experiences judicial corruption and injustice, Rule 1.6 prevents the rule of law and constitutional rights. FOREVER.
Rule 1.6 victims faces only 3 possible outcomes... 1) Homeless/Destitute 2) Incarcerated and 3) Suicide. There can be no life when a person can be attacked at any time and have no recourse, no protection, no escape. It's unimaginable and hard to explain, because that is not supposed to even be possible. Rule 1.6 is about keeping things quiet.
WHY THE HUBBUB, BUB?
The moratorium on executions and the review of Death Row Cases requested by the Governor was explained - multiple hearings mis-used courts and stalling processes occurring post sentencing. The exoneration of prisoners nationwide has been a shock.
PROSECUTORIAL IMMUNITY. The law allows prosecutors to do anything to get a conviction - within or outside the law, the prosecutor can't be prosecuted for such crimes, deliberate or intentional or malicious or corrupt. Those issues are reported to the Disciplinary Board and IGNORED.
Where Prosecutors are protected from prosecution, why would they respond to Gov Wolf's announcement as they have done.
- - Aggressive.
- Misinformation.
- Disinformation.
- Indicating a Cause For Public alarm and fear.
- Listing the major reported crimes - sentenced and not yet heard.
- Calling out the police widows - their grief is not a tool - it is disrespectful to upset them with misinformation.
- The tweets suggesting the governor lacks authority, or is acting like a king,
the extremes of their grandstanding are absurd. They know what is at stake.
The 'worst kept secret in Pennsylvania', where the lawyers can't explain the law which mandated their confidentiality and non-disclosure while mandated to non-disclosure and confidentiality by the law.
The Silence of Rule 1.6 is not something to ignore while lawyers are allowed to lie to get you to ignore it.
The public knows who is on death row. Once they are there, no one cares. No one gives a damn about anyone in prison. If a person in prison has anyone who does care, that person is required to explain to everyone everywhere. They know most don't listen or give a damn how they waste their time trying to exonerate any prisoner. Against those incredible odds, it has happened. More frequently than is acceptable. How does a society apologize to a man improperly jailed for decades, subjected to the indignities of prison life, the disrespect by everyone??? Society is grateful those select winners have not been angry and retaliated. In itself, that's remarkable.
The Governor is seeking a conversation which the District Attorneys cannot have and are not permitted to explain.
The Attorney General has a court order preventing investigations, prosecutions and involvement and is not permitted to explain.
The Governor has made no accusation or expectation for the review. He explained his reasons.
His attorney general is afflicted by court orders - secret orders from unidentified courts which expose her to personal liability and REQUIRE her neglect of the duties of her office but deny any explanation.
The Attorney General cannot share the orders, ... are they secret, or imaginary? Pennsylvania Courts do not operate like that. The courts are transparent and open, which reinforces their judicial independence to reach just and lawful decisions.
The Governor asked about the people in prison who no one cares about.
The Attorney General is moot with an overactive imagination, or secret orders indicating she is fearful of speaking.
The District Attorneys are paranoid and highly confrontational and calling names.
THE DA's have clearly over reacted... WHY?
"What's not being said" - IS the issue.
I'm sane (with papers) permit me to explain because it all started when I found this one bad law. Rule 1.6 I call it the needle in the haystack of injustice. I'm allowed to talk and have done so often to excess. Here goes...
THE AFFECT OF ONE LAW
Rule 1.6 Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure results in the victims of injustice losing all protection of the law and their rights secured and protected by the US Constitution are ignored. IGNORED by every in law enforcement, lawyers and the courts.
This casual open neglect by judges and prosecutors is reported everywhere by people who don't understand why the judges and lawyers are getting away with it.
Lawyers don't like to take some cases, because they have no chance of winning where they are required to maintain CONFIDENTIALITY and cannot explain the injustice. If they get hit with litigation from a client, the judge realizes their misconduct was due to Rule 1.6 confidentiality and lets the lawyers slide. The realization likely occurred in an ex parte conversation.
The injustice grows... from the first instance. Rights were lost at that point. Never regained. Everything ignored to conceal the error/crime/injustice. The lawyers are getting paid anyway until the person runs out of money. Self representing while fraud is permitted to conceal fraud puts a litigant in a court where the only person needing justice is the person denied it to conceal prior injustice without explanation.
It's not buddy lawyer and buddy judge. Rule 1.6 mandated non-disclosure and confidentiality even conceals fraud to conceal fraud. It is not personal. It is not what you said, or what you did not say. You cannot affect the continued injustice you receive. Every lie ever told may be offered as explanation while they are not permitted to disclose the truth.
- Rule 1.6 requires non-disclosure of acts in the furtherance of fraud to conceal fraud. The fraudulent efforts to cover up the injustice are required to be kept confidential. The fraud cannot be prosecuted because it, and effort to conceal it, must remain confidential.
- Rule 1.6 requires non-disclosure of information which would rectify the fraud and efforts to conceal are permitted endorsed excused and held confidential.
To the victim of injustice, there is no escape from further injustice. Escape can be imagined. But the reality can occur at any moment where the prior injustice can be leveraged for further injustice WHILE REQUIRED TO BE CONCEALED. It's bad because there was no way out then. You cannot control it. They cannot control it. If someone uses it, you will lose every time. They cannot say why. (Most don't know why it works, they just know it works.) It may undermine the remainder of your life. #INJUSTICE #CORRUPTION
Most people are safe. Injustice is not supposed to occur, the judge is responsible to guard against it. Often, lawyers negotiate the situation into something else entirely, an agreement. The victim of injustice is ALWAYS in jeopardy. You have no protection of the law. People may commit crimes against you and suffer no consequences. Not paranoia, this is reality.
The protection of the law and civil/human/constitutional rights are things which you only seek when you need them. EVERYONE KNOWS THE BASICS. BUT, most do not know that there's a LAW which makes it OK to ignore, and REQUIRES that the law and your rights be ignored. IF you get any explanation, it can be horseshit (fraud in the furtherance). If it didn't make sense. The law excuses every non-sensical illogical misinformation when concealing injustice. The person making it up is under no obligation to tell you truth when the law says they can't reveal the injustice.
ONLY ONE CONDITION VOIDS CONFIDENTIALITY
The victim of injustice may not be killed.
The victim of injustice may not be killed. Disclosure is MANDATED in that instance. ALL PRIOR CONFIDENTIALITY AND NON-DISCLOSURE IS NOT APPLICABLE.
But as long as the victim of injustice is not to be murdered or killed, Rule 1.6 confidentiality is aggressively enforced.
Suicides do not void confidentiality.
- You may be tormented to that decision by non-disclosed fraud and injustice. It's the choice of the person to commit suicide. It is not murder. Suicide does not end Rule 1.6 Confidentiality and non disclosure... it only stops further injustice.
.
If the victim is dead already, there's no disclosure permitted. Confidentiality starts to conceal at that initial injustice. #Ferguson
- So when a lawyer misguides a grand jury about an innocent victim being shot, the lies, misinformation and disinformation are permitted. It is called fraud in the furtherance to conceal prior injustice/fraud/corruption.
THE PENNSYLVANIA DA's REACTION
The injustice described above is concealed according to the law. That law applies to lawyers and legal professionals ONLY. They must follow the law, unless the KNOW that it is unconstitutional to them.
Unconstitutional to you does not provide standing for a lawyer to challenge the constitutionality. The lawyer can't litigate unconstitutional to you while the law is the law; because, the law requires non-disclosure and confidentiality of lawyers.
You could do it yourself, BUT the court staff follow the law and they can intercept and interfere. The judge may not ever see it, or
you.
YOU DID NOTHING TO CAUSE THIS PROBLEM. Most likely, when the trigger occurred, you were not informed at all. Everything just stopped being lawful.
Everyone must follow the law.
Confidentiality prevents District Attorneys from any effort to remove the law.
District Attorneys follow the law. The DA's did not enact the law, and they cannot change the law.
How do you explain to a governor that the prisoner is on death row and faces no real intention to execute the death sentence.
An Injustice is keeping the prisoner on death row alive. BUT, if we learn of intent to execute, we may no longer conceal an injustice and any fraudulent efforts which conceal it.
So maybe they don't belong on death row? Under Rule 1`.6 we can't say unless he's going to be killed.
What was the Injustice? We can;t say. Rule 1.6 mandates non-disclosure and confidentiality.
By not executing a prisoner on death row and where there is no real intent to kill the prisoner, Rule 1.6 Confidentiality and non-disclosure conceals fraud and injustice.
Keeping a victim of injustice alive on death row permits RULE 1.6 to conceal the 'fraud' that there is no real intent to execute.
THE PEOPLE ON DEATH ROW WHO MAY NOT FACE THE REAL RISK OF EXECUTION COULD BE VICTIMS OF CONCEALED RULE 1.6 INJUSTICE AND FRAUD TO COVER IT UP.
While there is no intent to kill, non-disclosure and confidentiality are mandated.
The Secrets are safe, unless the victim is going to be killed.
A PRISONER ON DEATH ROW
Where a prisoner on death row has been there for a prolonged time and no execution has been scheduled, the liklihood of there being an undisclosed injustice or corruption involved in the case is very strong.
EVERYONE MUST FOLLOW THE LAW... and lawyers and legal professionals are following Rule 1.6.
Lawyers cannot have anything to do with the review of the case? We can, but we would have to conceal the corruption and injustice. It would be kind of pointless I suppose.
NOW EXPAND THE LAW DOWN TO ALL PRISONERS
Rule 1.6 may concealing the injustice of a person who lost protection of the law, and their rights, and is incarcerated.
NOW EXPAND TO ALL PEOPLE
Rule 1.6 may concealing the injustice of a person who lost protection of the law, and their rights. Likely destitute/homeless as any crimes could take everything they owned and be ignored.
The cruelty of Rule 1.6 is that it prevents justice by mandating silence to keep the victim under attack, and prevents their death which would relieve them of further misery.
IT HAPPENED. IT IS HAPPENING EVERYWHERE.RE
Where the lawyers silently conceal the courts injustice and corruption, there is no protection of the law and constitutional rights are ignored.
KIDS FOR CASH... thousands of families, children jailed, no law no rights.
COMMISSION REPORT... lawyers mandated to not reveal Rule 1.6 Confidentiality failed to see the silence was mandated by law.
Foreclosures based on fraudulent documents... lawyers silently observed the courts injustice. Once the fraud was committed in the court, it could not be addressed.
The lawyer could conceal their client, non-existent or who could be themselves, forging fraudulent documents, all frauds in the furtherance of fraud prevented the rule of law and constitutional rights. Preventing prosecution where it would expose the injustice and corruption.
Could this be why no one was prosecuted during the Foreclosure Crisis, while robo-signed fraudulent documents were known to have been used, yet the courts allowed the foreclosures. Where lack of standing was ignored to conceal injustice.
Rule 1.6 INJUSTICE is the Constitutional Crisis Americans are witnessing.
THEY CAN'T DO THAT! YOU KNOW THEY DID.
RULE 1.6 IS THE LAW. It is an aggressively enforced mandate of Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure.
Rule 1.6 trumps every law - no protection under the law.
Rule 1.6 trumps every right and privilege secured and protected by the US Constitution.
Rule 1.6 is Confidentiality concealing injustice from which there can be no relief.
- Lawyers cannot help you while mandated to participate against you.
Purporting to be necessary, and ethical, it is often suggested to be only "attorney-client privilege", but is far broader and cross referenced throughout the 'Rules'. One law enacted in each state which must be followed by federal attorneys and investigators and is part of the local rules in federal courts.
The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 - GOT 1.6'd
The District Court was unprepared for the pro se litigant with evidence proving Rule 1.6 UNCONSTITUTIONAL
- Dismissed. Unsigned, Unsubstantiated. Fraud in the furtherance by lawyer in the clerks office.
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed and did not permit Reconsideration.
- Affirmed. Reconsideration Denied. Unsigned. Efforts to witness the delivery of the case to the judges resulted in the US Marshalls being called. The Marshalls were already aware of the 'problem' - like the sheriffs have been convinced of diminished responsibilities
Rule 1.6 Challenge got Rule 1.6'd.
The Constitutional Challenge was pre-emptory, and intended to prevent the corruption and loss of integrity within the higher PA courts.
Not until the lower court cases were before the Superior Court of PA did Rule 1.6 play before out before our eyes in Superior Court.
The supporting evidence of unconstitutionality occurred in the lower courts, and the Attorney General notified that it would be involved in the Appeal.
UNCONSTITUTIONAL DEMONSTRATION IN SUPERIOR COURT
The Central Legal Staff demonstrated a judiciary held hostage. The activities of the court staff - violations of Appellate Rules, PA law and interfering with the administration of the courts, obstruction of justice, et al. The actions were on the record. While every document must be submitted through the staff, the dismissals and responding documents were clearly not the product of the judiciary .Unsigned and violating the judicial canons, neglecting applicable law. When challenged for evidence of judicial involvement, failure to comply and failure to explain would indicate Rule 1.6 non-disclosure.
Using Rule 1.6 to conceal their violation of my constitutional rights, PROVED THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL AFFECT OF THE LAW. Rule 1.6 had the collateral affect of denying a litigant of constitutionally protected rights and privileges and denied the protection of the law.
WHY DIDN'T THE JUDGES COVER FOR THEIR STAFF?
Where the lower court acted in the clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction, in violation of Pennsylvania law, and issued a defective and void order, obstructed a primary appeal, failed to provide court records, et al. there would not be any availability of absolute judicial immunity. This judge neglected every aspect , and prevented any resolution. She retaliated with cruelty, and irreparable damage. She's exposed 20 judges ion the lower court to the loss of immunity. Yes, there were 20 judges in the matter. No, not rich. Destitute now. Just didn't suicide, like he was supposed to.
If the Superior Court Judiciary concealed up for the actions of the staff, they faced liability due to the lack of absolute judicial immunity caused in the lower court.
The level of fraud in the furtherance in Healy v Healy may have been very extreme. So much so that it caused him to discover Rule 1,6 was at the center of everything. 8-9 years now, and going...
Criminal Complaints
Requests for signed documents were ignored, the court informed of the offenses/complaint, and complaints sent to the Us Attorney and the District Attorney of Philadelphia and Bucks County, and the Attorney General of PA, and others.
Appellate procedure/law required the Pennsylvania Attorney general be notified of the challenge to the constitutionality of the law being an element of the appeal. Healy v Healy(Carluccio), Healy v Healy(Page) and Healy v Miller(Weilheimer) were some of the appeals.
Two unidentified court orders from unidentified courts silence the AG, and prevent her investigation and responsibilities of her office. They are under appeal. Little is known about the documents. There is also a grand jury issue which is silencing the attorney general - from Montgomery County - same as Healy v Healy and Healy v Miller.
There are documents entered into the dockets and removed which have not been provided to the parties. The Court responded with an Order, but did not copy the Appellant. Requests for production of the documents are DENIED. No Signatures.
The Attorney General now well informed of the unconstitutional effect, Rule 1.6 is no law, and provides no mandate for confidentiality and non-disclosure as a lawyer. HOWEVER, two secret court orders from two unidentified courts mandate her silence. They must be followed until appealed and removed.
There is no allowance for the courts to issue secret orders on cases which are not heard obligating person who are not a party to the action.
The law is the law until it is not the law.
Until declared unconstitutional or suspended by the legislature, Rule 1.6 permits fraud to conceal fraud. Rule 1.6 conceals fraud in the furtherance or to prevent rectifying the fraud, so secret court orders must be followed.
Without necessity to adhere to an unconstitutional law, the courts have issued two secret court orders which must be obeyed until they are stricken on appealed. The court orders mandate the participation of Kathleen kane in the violation of constitutional protected rights from which there can be mo immunity or protected from demands for releif. A conspiracy to deny and prevent constitutional rights is created and evidenced by the documents. The orders require Kathleen Kane to violate her oath of office and the responsibilities and duties of the Office of the Attorney General. The Orders prevents her from exposing the documents or discussion.
While ther has been no official confirmation of the documents relating to my cases or appeals, the possibility of coincidence is null.
Powerful secret orders... summed up by Kathleen Kane as follows:
“I am shocked at the level of public corruption.”
“I am shocked at how deep it goes.
I am shocked at how powerful it is.
I have never seen anything like this. It’s breathtaking.
It has been described by the people familiar with what is happening as shameful.”
“But, if this can be done to me as Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer of the 5th largest state in the country, I am sickened to think what can and may be done to regular, good people who don’t have the resources that I have to challenge it.”
The DA's know what the Governor may find.
The DA's know what the Governor may find. They will not be permitted to explain. Innocent persons on death row with no escape. The inability to explain, silenced by LAW, will be unacceptable, and embarrassing and revealing. Rule 1.6 will be further exposed to the pubic, but not by lawyers.
Those who attack the silenced Attorney General will be seen under a different perspective.
So far, THE DA's have failed to investigate and prosecute the Superior Court Staff. IGNORED pursuant to Rule 1.6.
They are participating in a conspiracy to deny constitutional rights, based on a law which when proven unconstitutional involves them in the federal crime. They are refusing to investigate and prosecute the crimes and the unconstitutional acts. Their professional responsibilities creates a personal liability.
They continue to participate in a conspiracy to deny constitutional rights, a federal offense, because of their participation in preventing constitutional rights.
THERE IS NO EXCUSE for denying a person of the constitutional rights, or participating in a conspircy to deny rights.
Yes, the law gets very spun around under Rule 1.6
WHO WROTE THIS UNCONSTITUTIONAL ABOMINATION?
There is no legislative immunity available for the authors who were not member of the legislature, or those supreme courts who improperly enacted and unconstitutional law.
Rule 1.6 was enacted nationwide from 1984 to 2009, promoted by the American Bar Association as a code of ethics while they knew it lacked ethics - they removed the 'fraud provisions' - their membership and affiliates exist in every jurisdiction of state and federal courts.
While enacted by the state supreme courts, they could not repeal according to their own law.
The judiciary have been held hostage ever since. Concealed by their participation which sacrifices their integrity, the injustice caused by the inability to escape a law which was their undoing. Lawyers preventing the judges from escape when the unconstitutional law was challenged.
The ABA is a trade organization with its purpose to promote the profession. They earned their membership piles of money, at the cost of the professional reputation. Injustice is a goldmine. Justice - not so much.
Holding the judiciary hostage after they violated the public trust and leveraging continued injustice for Americans in violation of the US Constitution where it benefited their members financially. The sedition of the American Bar Association will go down as the biggest scandal in US history... as soon as we can discuss it. The lawyers are not talking, and not allowing the courts to address the issue.
Justice is Coming.
| Did anyone else notice that the Attorney General had no comment on the moratorium? The Chief Law Enforcement Officer? The lawyer who represents the Governor and the Commonwealth? Do you suppose those secret court orders extended somehow to prevent effort which will expose Rule 1.6 in any way? There is no explanations for her failure to address the issue in Superior Court FOR THE THREE APPEALS and others. Documents submitted on her behalf in the Constitutional Challenge create a liability for her for conspiring to prevent the constitutional rights of EVERY AMERICAN. The lawyers removed 55 attorneys general from the challenge docket AND the appeal. One heck of a PERSONAL liability builds while the court orders are appealed. So that's why she got those high falootin lawyers... thje whole country has her in their sights, and the courts are creating her liability, preventing her actions and silencing her. It's a shame the courts and lawyers cannot say anything of this Rule 1.6 unless they recognize it is unconstitutional. Secret court may need to print alot of secret orders. Secretly of course. Darryl Metcalfe - Kanes got bigger concerns than bigots trying to impeach her. Seems you are continuing to prevent and obstruct constitutionally protected rights, and lamenting a proven unconstitutional law. |
Standing can be tricky... It is personal. It requires direct effect. I had it and it was dismissed anyway, Rule 1.6'd.
A Report on Death Row could reveal cases... possibly standing for the Gov?
Or maybe just the evidence the Legislature needs to suspend the law.
Constitutionally The Legislature has the only authority to suspend the law.
PLEASE STOP ASKING the judiciary committees - they are lawyers mandated to commit fraud in the furtherance to conceal it.
That's why Stewart Greenleaf refuses to talk to me, and his office was informed of the terror of my divorce for years. He knew the terror... so it had to be a law that made him ignore a constituent begging for help. Me finding Rule 1.6 after 7 years of litigation harassment and terror show Greenleaf is not a total ass, he just a corrupt evil politician that helped hide this for 30 years.
Todd Stephens believes people don't have constitutional rights unless the judge says so. He made me laugh. How many years did he work with District Attorney Bruce Castor to become that misinformed? Lawyer Stephens wins Funniest Fraud in the Furtherance. Where it made him out to be completely and totally stupid, he was just being a disrespectful asshole because the law required it. Are you stupid, or are you a lawyer
(committing fraud on the furtherance)
who thinks that I am?
Still waiting for that meeting with the other local officials...
How am I ever going to litigate against all of those people who conspired to deny my constitutional rights? even when not excused by an unconstitutional law? I'm ashamed for them... on the wrong side of an egregious rape of the public trust and unwilling to save the judiciary from their captors and restore their integrity.
I wasn't trying to gain defendants, I wanted you to do your job, follow your oath. Why did you get into politics if you didn't believe in the US Constitution? Did the lawyers scare you off? Do you realize HOW HUGE this issue is?
Rep. Katherine M. WatsonRep. Marguerite Quinn
Rep. Todd Stephens
Rep. Tina Davis
Rep. Scott Petri
Rep. John T. Galloway
Rep. Thomas Murt
Rep. Steven J. SantarsieroRep. Frank Farry
Rep. Paul Clymer
Rep. Gene DiGirolamo
Rep. Bernie O’Neill
Rep. Kate Harper
Sen. Bob MenschSen. Robert Tomlinson
Sen. Charles McIlhinney
Sen. Stewart Greenleaf
Congressman Mike FitzpatrickSenator Bob Casey
Senator Pat Toomey
The word out of Oklahoma this week is the introduction of a Bill in their Legislature to prevent prosecution for abuse of power by limiting the ability to prosecute exclusively to the state Attorney General.. to the exclusion of the District Attorneys.
With the current effort to remove an unconstitutional law which has been concealed under the disinformation that it is 'attorney-client privilege" and where it results in devastating and inescapable loss of constitutional rights of the victim FOREVER... and where Rule 1.6 clearly demonstrates the unconstitutional ability and the defiance to being addressed - because lawyers may not reveal the TRUTH. 
Only the attorney general could file those criminal cases, if House Bill 2206 becomes law.
Granted, most of the political class is already de facto above the law to begin with.
