with apologies to Oprah. You're being sued. And You're being sued. And You're being sued.

The volume of correspondence being prepared this week is daunting. Their injustice clock runs on billable hours. Time slows when every hope becomes a further injustice and corruption. Where isolated from family and the milestones which build into a life, time stops.

Those who offer the Facebook meme versions of Let It Go, Get Over It, Move On, This Too Shall Pass... have failed to recognize I am surviving, nothing more. THIS TOO SHALL PASS was wrong in 2007. You did not believe me, trust my judgement, the logical fail, my rationale... they played you against me. Friendships waned.

No one wants to live a life void of joy where other people's smiles make you wonder if you will ever have cause to smile again. Somehow, I persevere.

---

I have never done anything where the sole intent was to demonstrate that failure of a system or the person involved. That was always a consequence within their own control. I had no ability to cause people to do the right thing. At best, I could provide them the opportunity. Every response provided the chance for explanations which were not provided, or were deliberately concealed.

A stranger lies. The lie is contrary to reason and lacking any necessity or motivation. When asked to explain, they panic acting fearful and threatened - - You made no threat, but someone else has. When asking for an explanation, the answer "I need my job" demonstrates the intimidation involved. Their supervisors never responded. Everything - ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING - and EVERYONE at the courthouse was 'affected' by the corruption and injustice... and fearful of exposing it further. They knew the retaliatory realities of judges and lawyers. I was learning that reality.

Every proceeding and action in the divorce from 2007 forward had been affected - manipulated by secrecy, failure to apply the law, no explanations, no resolutions. Every injustice was a FARCE which when exposed resulted in the recusal of the judge and another judfge assigned. Twenty Judges have been directly involved in the matter with each sacrificing their integrity for the failure of the prior judges - mandated by Rule 1.6.

Farce is not an overly broad generalization. It is fact. Evidence is the court record, the hundred of documents filed.

I was being prosecuted/terrorized to the fullest extent of every law and court order and defending against every false allegation held accountable to know and follow every procedure and law. Any, every and All failures by my wife, and her attorneys, to follow the law, procedures, due process, court orders, courtroom protocol were excused without consequence or warning for continued failures. Their deliberate failures lead to the situation which is undeniable. The judge to issued an order in the clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction, a defective and void order which is void ab initio, evidence is clearly demonstrated in 'the court record'. BUT the lawyers still present the defective order for enforcement... successfully... even on appeal, successfully... leveraging the exposure of the corruption of the court for further injustice while preventing any resolution. Rule 1.6 Injustice. FOREVER.

Everything was undermined by the necessity to NOT REVEAL the secret, or prevent discovery. EVER. No law. No rights. No justice. None. EVER. FOREVER. No kidding. FOREVER. Another reality to learn because no one would believe it. Myself included.

The Rule 1.6 mandate of non-disclosure and confidentiality survives the death of the attorney. Forever.

Believe it. No justice. No escape. Ever. Forever.

---

Those who continue to undermine the US Constitution have been (and will be) compelled to public actions which they will not be able to deny or ignore or conceal or obfuscate. "Through their own words, they will be exposed." If one person had done the right thing at anytime, the situation would not have been able to continue. No one helped. So many people working against me in violation of the law and procedures. What could possibly cause so many people to fail without explanation or reason... It's their fault I found RULE 1.6 which undermined everyone and everything and every law including the US Constitution.

The law is clear about who may be held responsible for their failures to perform the responsibilities of their government office and whether they may be litigated professionally and PERSONALLY.

I have no other alternative but to present the illegal actions to persons who are in government positions where they recognize the corruption of the judiciary and DO NOTHING to address the wrongdoing. The lawyers and non-lawyers have no long term protection by and through an unconstitutional law and the corruption concealed by it.... except that the entire government has participated and concealed the corruption of the undermined judiciary under the false impression that it is better than addressing the problem.... which is HUGE.

Americans must set pride aside, acknowledge the past injustice and rectify the government for the future.

Every. Person. Matters.

"The truth is sometimes a hard pill to swallow. It sometimes causes us difficulties at home and abroad. It is sometimes used by our enemies in attempts to hurt us. But the American people are entitled to it, nonetheless." - Sen. John McCain

By its terms, US Section 1983 imposes liability without defense on state and local officials who, acting under color of law in their individual capacity, deprive plaintiffs of rights created by the Constitution and federal law.

The Problem arises where Rule 1.6 being unconstitutional is No Law. A nullity.
IT WAS, UNTIL IT ISN'T. AND THEN, it never was.

Unconstitutional secret secrecy is Rule 1.6 INJUSTICE.

While Rule 1.6 is mandating a conspiracy to deprive a person of rights and requiring the participation (or inaction or disinformation) of everyone required to follow it, there is no excuse in the 'Liability Game' for the actions which clearly deprive a person of their rights by a person who is sworn to protect their rights and who knows that their own actions are unconstitutional and repugnant.

PROFESSIONALLY - certain immunities apply to the organizations and officials involved in government, PERSONAL LIABILITY is another issue where a person knows better and has the responsibility to effect a change. The LAW has allowances built into the construction of the law which addresses the purpose and explains the reasoning and the proper application for the judiciary. No law violates the US Constitution.

The government is constitutional where allowing for review of constitutional questions by the judiciary. The Public Trusts the Judiciary. A necessity so essential that they trusted it would not be violated. Corrupt judges were hung because we trusted them.

A problem exists where there is no way to tell the judiciary that A LAW THE JUDICIARY ENACTED is unconstitutional. Done outside the normal legislative construction of a law, there was no construct, no explanation, no review, no reasoning, ... and no legislative immunity for the authors. The law mandating non-disclosure and confidentiality did not permit ANY lawyer to address the unconstitutional aspect or effects, and concealed fraud in the furtherance to prevent the situation from being rectified or exposed.

Injustice has thrived based on disinformation which distracts from the problem law. A perceived prideful judicial arrogance is leveraged while interference with the administration of justice conceals the violation of the public trust and the loss of judicial independence. Two essential elements have been surreptitiously removed from the US Justice system - the known point of failure was always the judiciary. The judiciary had been undermined and held hostage by the American Bar Association by a law which required that information be concealed... that the violation of the public trust be concealed... the loss of judicial independence was concealed... everything they were doing to conceal it was also concealed. Everything leveraged to the benefit of their membership - who had no idea how it broke, but knew something was not right. Everyone noticed the government was 'ignoring' the US Constitution.

When an individual person is participating in actions which they know to be wrong, and quite UNCONSTITUTIONAL, the law expects and requires them to do the right thing. They can be held professionally and personally responsible for their actions, or the failure to act, even where an unconstitutional law had them violate a person's rights.

The US Constitution does not provide any allowance for the denial of rights protected by the US Constitution. Any law which attempts to deny rights is No Law, a nullity, and provides no protection for participation in unconstitutional acts.

But, you must bring the case to the Judiciary. The judiciary who enacted the unconstitutional law, the nullity, in violation of the US Constitution AND THE CONSTITUTION OF EVERY STATE. You must bring the humiliatingly embarrassing case of AMERICAN INJUSTICE to those responsible for the INJUSTICE.

ONE OTHER THING, that unconstitutional law, Rule 1.6, mandates that they do nothing to expose that unconstitutional aspect. Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure by judges, lawyers or legal professionals. Rule 1.6 permits/requires further acts of fraud to prevent exposure, or where disclosure would rectify the matter.

Rule 1.6 permits/requires the failure to indicate that Rule 1.6 is the reason that you cannot have justice pursuant to Rule 1.6. Rule 1.6 will undermine the law and the courts while any attempt is made to address the unconstitutional results.

PENNSYLVANIA - The judiciary shut down the Attorney General in defiance of law, procedures, separation of powers, etc... They clearly realized that it was not just about the inappropriate relationships which delayed the prosecution of Jerry Sandusky, Kathleen Kane was about to blow the lid off of the INJUSTICE game - NATIONALLY! Two cases which by law required the Attorney General's attention as an unconstitutional state law would be demonstrated in the appeals. In the Superior Court of Pennsylvania - Healy v Healy and Healy v Miller.

For example. You own a house. That house is illegally sold. The law is clear. If you have possession, you file QUIET TITLE. If you do not have possession, you file EJECTMENT. You file Ejectment and it is dismissed because you do not have possession. An error in application of law. On Appeal, it is affirmed. No Reconsideration. The judiciary neglects to address the proper law, neglects to apply that law to the situation, and neglects to address the issue. The 'elephant in the room', INJUSTICE, is being concealed pursuant to Rule 1.6. The court is mandated to conceal that Rule 1.6 is causing further Rule 1.6 injustice. It defies logic. It defies common sense. They write pages, yet miss the mark. BECAUSE, the unconstitutional law requires that the unconstitutional law not be disclosed. To conceal the judicial quagmire, the court staff intercepts and intervenes handling the matter without the involvement of the judiciary. Are the staff protecting the judges from the liability for unconstitutional actions? ... or holding the judiciary hostage by preventing the judge from the decision? The criminal, and unconstitutional, interception and interference with the administration of justice and the forgery and fraud by the court staff are in the furtherance of a fraud, Non-Disclosure is mandated pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality. The court staff are professional lawyers who know their actions are violating the state and federal law and the US Constitution. Where the court may not have believed when you indicated that the case would expose a constitutional issue, their own unconstitutional actions quickly convinces them. (CONSIDER: Secret Order/Unidentified Court which prevents investigation and responsibilities of the Office of the Attorney General. Where an unconstitutional law is a nullity, a court order must be followed while appealed even when improper, unlawful and unconstitutional. The 'secret' court order creates a liability, professionally and personally, for the Attorney General who is being required by court order to participate in a conspiracy to deny constitutionally protected rights. Multiple actions to silence Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane are carefully exposed to the media. Without any allowance for explanation, the Attorney General must be silent or risk a contempt action for violating the court order. Two court orders - one for each appeal in Superior Court. GRAND JURY SECRECY becomes an issue where allegations are 'leaked' suggesting violations by Kathleen Kane, personally and professionally as Attorney General. No explanations or details. Speculation is widespread misdirection, it is no coincidence that my cases are in Montgomery County. CALL FOR IMPEACHMENT: A call is made to the Legislature to impeach Kathleen Kane for non-enforcement of an unconstitutional law - the Marriage issue - and the 'speculation' of the Grand Jury leaks. EVERYTHING IS ABOUT THE SILENCING OF KATHLEEN KANE - under whom the 'monkeywrench' was thrown which undermined a Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 in the federal courts after every state attorney general intentionally defaulted. A very similar situation where everything was handled by the court staff without any evidence of judicial involvement. Reported to the US Marshalls and the DOJ, US Attorney general Eric Hodler and US Attorney Zane Memeger. SILENCE.) Prosecution of the court staff would expose the unconstitutional effect of Rule 1.6 which has resulted in YOUR loss of any protection under the law AND loss of rights protected by the US Constitution. No PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW. NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. NO KIDDING. The Crimes and Constitutional offenses were reported. I am still awaiting the investigation by 1) Zane Memeger, US Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania 2) Seth Williams, District Attorney for Philadelphia 3) David Heckler, District Attorney for Bucks County 4) Kathleen Kane, Pennsylvania Attorney General 5) USPS, United States Postal Inspectors - Mail Fraud 6) the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Their silence is unexplained. AG Kathleen Kane couldn't even say WHY she is being silent.

The Silence of Lawyers regarding an unconstitutional law which results in INJUSTICE, leaving people with no protection under the law while denying and ignoring rights protected and secured by the US Constitution with no opportunity for relief or resolution.

The Rules of Professional Conduct require lawyers to report this to the Judiciary. It is the law. If they did, it was not disclosed at any level. Rule 1,6 non-disclosure trumps that requirement. Rule 1.6 trumps every law, every constitution, every reform and mandates that it be concealed and any explanation prevented.



THAT IS WRONG. Ask a lawyer... but, they probably won't tell you. (At best you may hear 'attorney-client privilege' blah blah. It's not called attorney-client privilege. It is called Confidentiality of Information.)

AS FOR THE NEWS MEDIA??? Draw your own conclusions about the control of the news media in the US.

THE PENNSYLVANIA LEGISLATURE HAS THE ONLY AUTHORITY TO SUSPEND A LAW WITHIN THE COMMONWEALTH OF PA. While they not acting on the 'worst kept secret in Pennsylvania' people are suffering an incomprehensible injustice which is difficult to explain and they are killing themselves. Suicide is logical where there is no hope.

Where there may seem to be no hope, there is still a Constitution of the United States of America. Somewhere along the way, the Judiciary neglected the trust placed in them by the People. The Public Trust - The lawyers ripped of it's head. shit down it's throat and raped it leaving it for dead. Big mistake. HUGE. EVERY PERSON MATTERS.

The list of available immunities is considerably longer than one might believe. Judicial Immunity, Absolute Immunity, Absolute Judicial Immunity, Prosecutorial Immunity, Witness Immunity, Legislative Immunity, Qualified Immunity (Executive Officials), Established Law, Reason and Discretion. One thing which they all have in common... THERE IS NO IMMUNITY FOR VIOLATING THE CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED RIGHTS OF AMERICAN PEOPLE.

What has been happening is that Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information has prevented disclosure of the constitutional violations and prevented resolution of the crimes where it would expose that they are keeping a secret pursuant to their secret Rule 1.6 - which hides in plain site buried by cross references throughout the Rules of Professional Conduct - a minimum ethical standard which lacks ethics, morality and lawfulness - presented to every state Supreme Court and enacted into law at the behest of the American Bar Association.

The American Bar Association knew what they were doing when they deliberately removed the fraud provisions from Rule 1.6 in 1983. INJUSTICE IS A GOLDMINE - the ABA membership is the beneficiary to their unconstitutional law which holds a judiciary hostage - removing judicial independence from the judge and requiring injustice continue unexplained without resolution.

To the ABA,
Close your doors now. Shut Down your corrupt and seditious organization... including the affiliates in every jurisdiction of state and federal judiciary. You tried to save the integrity of your profession by writing a code of ethical conduct, and you deliberately failed - at a considerable profit for some members but sacrificing any integrity, respect or honor for the remainder.

Rule 1.6 Peek-A-Boo Injustice cannot be concealed by an apathetic population who does not want to believe or accept that 48 million people lost their homes, thousands of children were jailed in Luzerne County, and people were murdered in Ferguson and New York without anyu opportunity for JUSTICE, or any relief from further injustice.

To the government officials who, once notified, are personally and professionally liable for their participation in the conspiracy to deny Americans of constitutionally protected rights.

Do you really want me to bring you all into a courtroom to demonstrate Rule 1.6 INJUSTICE again. I have the confirmations of receipt by every state attorney general, every state governor, every senator in every state, the US Congress, the entire Pennsylvania Legislature, every sheriff in Pennsylvania, every judge in every court in Bucks and Montgomery Counties... It's not called the 'worst kept secret in Pennsylvania' for nothing.


Is it your preference that Rule 1.6 be demonstrated in a courtroom before your very eyes... To see no protection under the law? To see denial of constitutional rights?

"They can't do that" going over and over in your head. "The judges are NOT supposed to do that." "They are ignoring the law, the constitution, civil rights, human rights, ... They can't do that. BUT, THEY DID. He was correct. He has no protection under the law and every constitutional right is being ignored. Why? The judge just threw his case out of court but didn't indicate a reason, and explanation or any support in applicable law. Rule 1.6 Confidentiality does not permit the judge to indicate that the current injustice was necessitated to conceal prior injustice pursuant to Rule 1.6 - - to conceal prior injustice before that... and before that... Rule 1.6 has broken and undermined the entire judiciary and JUSTICE. Improper law? enacted by Judiciary without authority? no review for constitutionality? not constructed as law? no legislature? no governor signed it? enacted in every state? included in federal district courts (Local Rules)? included in federal Court of Appeals (Local Rules)? mandated to every federal government lawyer (McDade-Murtha Amendment)? Did no one realize that the ABA Rule - the ethical standard for lawyers - lack ethics? morality? legality? or was every lawyer mandated to non-disclosure by Rule 1.6 and prevented from explaining what they meant to Congress when they indicated that McDade Murtha would have a disastrous result for the country. Did Rule 1.6 prevent the lawyers testifying before Congress from indicating that the state ethics laws lacked any ethics? ... and permitted, endorse and required lawyers to participate in fraud in the furtherance of fraud? ... even where it would rectify a prior fraud? ... preventing every federal government lawyer from any action which exposes, investigates or prosecutes judicial corruption and injustice within the state courts... in every state ... even where constitutional rights are concerned. Your lawyer just congratulated you on the 'BIG WIN' ...but you are not permitted to discuss the issue ... or the case pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality ... if you do, you would be prosecuted for your part in a conspiracy to deny the constitutional rights of an American ... your hearing would not be publicized ... your accidental suicide will be on the front pages - 'Defender of the Constitution' (This ironic award title is a standard practice by the American bar Association.... sometimes there's cash too.) It's just not even funny when it is true.

By neglect you encourage endorse and conceal an egregious violation of the Public Trust which harms Americans.
There is no valid excuse for unconstitutional acts. That is treason.

The non-lawyer Legislators have an obligation to every American which cannot be ignored by an unconstitutional law.
The non-lawyer legislators cannot ask their lawyers to advise them while their lawyers are obligated to commit fraud to conceal the injustice.

It is so wrong... affecting so many people... there is no argument offered ... no explanation... no justification,... no apology.

Surprise America!! - Your country was overthrown by lawyers 30 years ago. About fucking time you noticed. eh?

Americans must set pride aside, acknowledge the past injustice and rectify the government for the future.
Every. Person. Matters.

SHUT RULE 1.6 DOWN NOW. Suspend this unconstitutional law and vaccinate the entire country... so this never happens again.

I will "GO FULL OPRAH" commencing litigation against every government official that ignored this matter for the last 9 years. Silence and Non-response will not provide any defense or immunity when you are on the wrong side of the US Constitution.

Where the courts sacrifice integrity to conceal the injustice, everyone loses.

The only person getting paid will be your lawyer who is relying on his non-disclosure and license for fraud in the furtherance to conceal the constitutional violation of his client.

As a person without any protection of the law and experiencing the denial of rights protected by the constitution, I have no choice but to persevere. I have demonstrated my ability to persevere through injustice since 2007.

County Court documents and transcripts were not available or presented for the recent appeal. The 'court' ignored without explanation.

A mountain of evidence seems to have been concealed by Montgomery County, a grand jury investigation may have been misdirected by a special prosecutor with a potential conflict of interest (being married to a judge and President of the Montgomery County Bar Association resulting in the unavailability of the evidence.

The failure of a prolonged investigation designed and determined to destroy a man which prevented any protections under the law while excessive and improper informants, handlers, private investigators, and detective shared surveillance products throughout the courts and every level of law enforcement contributed the inability of law enforcement to correct the errors and wrongdoing.

Secrecy is the thing that makes every evil far worse than it would have been.

The damage continues while I am denied any life, protection of the law and constitutional rights.

A JUDGE COVERED FOR A LAWYER WHO TOLD HER CLIENT TO COMMIT A FEDERAL CRIME.
The efforts to conceal their injustice (court order found in 2010 after 3 years) has been an evil far worse than the initial injustice.

Twenty (20) judges, multiple courts. multiple appeals, federal constitutional challenges, every level of state and federal law enforcement, state and federal government, all prevented from any effort to help by a secrecy which overwhelmed and intimidated.

Only a sociopath, who was a lawyer, could have calculated and manipulated every situation and liability into one unconstitutional law - which mandates silence and permits continued terror.

Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane:

I am coming to pry open your secret court orders. We have not spoken a single word to each other, yet I believe in you still.

My belief in people is the source of my perseverance, and my challenge to trust again.

Americans must set pride aside, acknowledge the past injustice and rectify the government for the future.
Every. Person. Matters.

Every. Person. Matters. War on INJUSTICE.

Excuse me. Um. I think I am lost. Do you enjoy destroying people? I just want to understand. I want to know what drives a person to do what you do. To ruin other people's lives...
... because you have taken everything from me. Abuse of Power under Color of Law... which lead me to THAT LAW which perverts justice and undermines the entire government.

You have manipulated a very strong team to assist you in your efforts which violate the Public Trust and is concealed. You have ripped the head off of Justice and shit down her throat.

You fail to understand. EVERY. PERSON. MATTERS. There are more of us than there are of you.

Rule 1.6 provides the ability to conceal the abuse of power under color of law. The unconstitutional nullity is NO LAW... and NO SECRET... anymore.

You are the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION. An organization which interferes and intervenes to cause injustice and prevent any escape. A membership which has intruded and intercepted at every level of the judiciary to perpetrate unconstitutional acts while concealed behind a judiciary held hostage. There are more of us than there are of you.

The actions of the ABA membership to prevent JUSTICE are exposed. Two secret orders from unidentified courts which silence and prevent Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane from the responsibilities and duties of her office will not stop an awareness of the corruption caused and concealed by RULE 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION of the Rules of Professional Conduct - a minimum ethical standard which lack any ethics - permitting non-disclosure in the furtherance of fraud or to prevent resolution. INJUSTICE endorsed by SILENCE. A Mandatory Silence.

Rule 1.6 is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. JUSTICE IS COMING.

---

"I’ve seen it happen numerous times and I marvel at how the “bully” doesn’t see it."

"a person who spends his/her professional life figuring how to [screw] others…”

"a seasoned veteran of investigations and multi-faceted prosecutions that take months, if not years, to build, and hundreds of hours to prepare)" - with a twisted and perverted sense of paranoia because their injustice has been excused.

EXPOSED. "What is in doubt is how badly, and what the fallout will be."

"Career lawmen think strategically. They don’t go for the immediate gratification of a personal attack, instead preferring to set the board up just right and striking at the precise moment where the object of the attack cannot recover."

"I’ve witnessed a long line of politicians who have picked fights like this for short term personal or political benefit. I can’t recall any that have managed to avoid being hurt far more seriously for having done so."

"The moral: don’t pick a political fight against someone schooled in how to really hurt you."

There are more of us than there are of you.

The weapon of injustice, Rule 1.6, is revealed. An unconstitutional, improper, manipulative fraud. Repugnant to the principles and beliefs upon which the United States was founded.

Every. Person. Matters.

Every. Person. Matters. JUSTICE IS COMING.

---

The Quotes come from a manifesto written by an apparently angry and frightened man upon learning his efforts to undermine an attorney general had a setback. A prosecutor for 22 years, including two terms as District Attorney, who has served as President of the Pennsylvania District Attorneys Association, Bruce Castor believes he has attained a sterling reputation for pursuing truth, justice, and accountability in public office. He is the only person who believes his lie.

Castor was Montgomery County District Attorney when A Terroristic Divorce was initiated in 2007. It seems every oerson to whom I turned for help were the ones who were already working to destroy me - unable to tell the truth - unable to end my terror. Because of an unconstitutional law which prevented them from doing the right thing. EVER.

The Terror of a Constant Threat

The recipient of Rule 1.6 injustice has no protection of the law. Their constitutional rights are ignored by the courts and law enforcement. All legal professionals are prevented from helping or doing anything to resolve ANY situation. Triggered by an act of judicial misconduct, Rule 1.6 secretly and silently undermines a litigant while attempting to conceal the injustice of a judge and protect the integrity of the judiciary.

There is no opportunity to succeed in a court. Without the rule of law and while constitutional rights are being ignored, survival is the best possible outcome - - BUT the victim does not know that and arrives in court... Prepared. Researched. Documented. Properly executed. Procedures followed. Yet, the victim leaves court battered and further threatened and terrified by the experience of the inexplicable actions of a corrupted court. The court provides no explanations for their injustice. Rule 1.6 Confidentiality applies.

The ONLY person in the courtroom who believes in 'the justice system' is the unwitting target who trusts it. Everyone else knows that there will be no justice. The lawyers, the judges, the court staff, the deputies observe the corruption and injustice. They witness justice. Intimidated by corruption, THEY RECOGNIZE WHEN A PROCEEDING IS A FARCE.

A FARCE. Every proceeding. For years.

In hindsight, it is clear and undeniable. Procedures are not followed. Protocol is abandoned. The law is ignored. Rights protected by the US Constitution are unavailable. Court Orders are not enforced. Only their victim is swiftly held to a stringent adherence to every procedure, protocol, law, and order. The victim must respond to and address and disprove each and every false allegation against them to survive it.

Robert Angst and Valerie Angst, the lawyers with education and a staff are excused from every failure. Their failures are deliberate. They serve to create an undercurrent of deliberate chaos. An ever increasing volume of issues to be presented. A cacophony of injustice which will 'annoy the living shit' out of the judge who knows that the entire thing is a complete farce. Angst & Angst made certain that they were protected from any backlash by a judge who ignored their every failure.

In the end, it is the document filed by Robert Angst to prevent any divorce decree from being issued 'pre-maturely' which exacerbates the procedural defect and a law deliberately constructed and enacted to assure litigants had the opportunity to be heard. Where neither party requested the entry of the divorce decree the court lacks authority and jurisdiction to enter an order. Robert Angst had filed a document indicating that a divorce decree should NOT be entered. Where neither party requested the entry of the Divorce Decree, and the Plaintiff through her lawyers indicated they did NOT want the entry of a divorce decree, Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio acted in the clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction.

The calculated actions of Angst & Angst neglected due process, procedure and law with intent. Those actions would appear to create a form of leverage whereby the judge might be lenient on their next failure. While every proceeding was pre-determined to deny any success to the hopeful victim, they were daring the judge to follow procedure and law. Sociopaths throwing the judge under the bus. By creating a 'clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction' for the judiciary, Angst & Angst were able to leverage judicial immunity for further injustice.

Absolute Judicial Immunity is provided to the judiciary even where the judicial actions of the judge…
… exceed their jurisdiction,
… are done maliciously or corruptly, or
… are flawed by grave procedural error.

THERE IS A SINGLE EXCEPTION. In order to lose immunity, there must be a clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction.

Where any judge strikes the defective and void order, they would be expose the liability of their benchmates. Angst & Angst again leverage the corruption of the judiciary and attempt to enforce a defective and void order. The Court complies with their extortion by COMPLETELY IGNORING THAT THE ORDER IS VOID AND COMPLETELY NEGLECTING THE CHALLENGE TO JURISDICTION. The terror of an 'unappealable order' which defies the attention of the court and threatens the life and liberty of the victim.

Why would there be twenty (20) judges involved in the matter of Healy v Healy? Imagine the shame and self-loathing which would occur when you are participating in a deliberate injustice, violating the trust of a litigant, a rouse to harass and terrify. Angst & Angst were doing everything possible to ensure that the judge excused and ignored enough of their wrong-doing to be identified as an active and involved participant. Those actions were being subsequently documented on the court record and were building a considerable volume of evidence.

Evidence of the procedural failures and the breach of protocol and violation of law are being presented in proceedings to enforce compliance with court orders - yet, the judge dismisses every matter without explanation. The judge can't tell the litigant that THE ENTIRE THING IS JUST A SHAM TO TERRORIZE A MAN. The judge is disgusted and just wants out. The judge's integrity is being sacrificed while Rule 1.6 prevents explanation or resolution or escape.

Where every judicial proceeding and action has been a complete sham. A performance whereby the victim is attacked again and again... because the victim survives, there will be further actions. NO ONE WILL STOP THEIR DESTRUCTIVE FARCE... Rule 1.6 allows fraud in the furtherance of fraud. Rule 1.6 does not permit disclosure to rectify the fraud. Rule 1.6 prevents every legal professional from helping.

Their 'FARCE' has denied life and liberty. Destroyed Financially. Isolated and divided family. Prevented custody and visitation. Left you unemployed, homeless and threatened with jail. Attached supporters bank accounts. Infiltrated all technology - your friends tech also. False friendships by Investigators and Informants. Required additional litigation, additional parties. Undermined an entire judiciary. Nine (9) years of my life. Prevented and denied any future relief or escape. THIS IS A DIVORCE. This is not a criminal case.

Only in the family courts can someone who has committed no crime lose everything.

WTF? I asked that in a letter to the Montgomery County Judiciary two months before I realized Rule 1.6 was the problem. There was no response.

The available resources, actions and efforts to terrorize their victim to being 1) homeless/destitute 2) incarcerated or 3) suicide are not as arbitrary as you might think. A review of documents which relate to good mental health practices when going through a stressful period demonstrates a disturbing strategy. Their litigation has been designed to undermine the target psychologically by removing or obstructing support and coping methods while isolating the victim. They are undermining emotional and mental health by directly inhibiting efforts which provide resilience.

Acting above the law without any sense of moral responsibility or social conscience they wrote a law which permitted every act against the target and prevented any escape. As long as the target is not going to be murdered, Rule 1.6 confidentiality mandates non-disclosure. Driving a target to suicide is an acceptable 'loophole'. Only a sociopath would design a system by which criminals were not permitted to kill, but permitted to bring about a suicide. Kutek would be horrified.

Lawyers rejected the 'fraud provisions' of Rule 1.6 against the prolonged debate and strong lobbying efforts of Robert Kutek while writing the code of ethical conduct for lawyers. Weeks after Kutek's sudden death in 1983, the fraud provisions were removed from Rule 1.6 and promoted by the American Bar Association to each state as an ethical standard while it's lack of ethics was inconsequential. In a clear contradiction to his legacy, the ABA refers to the committee responsible for the Rules of Professional Conduct as The Kutek Commission.

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality undermines the judiciary and every proceeding. The injustice grows while Rule 1.6 prevents resolution or escape from further actions. I would hope that my case is an extreme. My case demonstrates the broad affect of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality which prevents any remedy. It is the volume of information and experiences which lead to the discovery of the needle in the haystack of injustice. Where no explanation was offered... and no question answered... EVER. Rule 1.6 could be applied to 'justify' the silence.

Rule 1.6 non-disclosure is permitted to conceal Rule 1.6 non-disclosure. They won't say anything and won't tell you why... Rule 1.6 is permitted to be invoked without invoking it. Rule 1.6 makes it possible to break the law, commit acts in the furtherance of that fraud, undermine the integrity and independence of the judiciary, prevent exposure through further fraud AND NOT EVER INDICATE THAT RULE 1.6 is involved. Ex parte communications, letters and meetings which arrange the injustice and corruption are also Rule 1.6 Confidential.

Prevented from information and denied rights and the protection of the law, my experience may be extreme but it is not isolated or unique... Rule 1.6 is law in every state. A violation of the public trust by the Judicial branch. The judiciary are accorded respect and honor BY LAW because it is necessary for the People to trust in JUSTICE.

The American Bar Association's Rule 1.6 has leveraged the public trust to undermine the judiciary. The only folks who profit from injustice are the members of the ABA and its affiliated organizations.

THE SCANDAL OF RULE 1.6 IS BIG. VERY BIG. HUGE.

JUSTICE IS COMING.

Another Suicide Season Approaches

As we head into the Holidays, Persevere. Justice is coming. It is slow. Painfully slow.

But like an addict who delays a need for rehab, THE INTERVENTION is an eventuality.

I've been through seven long, lonely, isolated, destitute holidays.
Pa rum pa pum pum.

I can't promise it will ever get better while the cause of their injustice is ignored ... while the media remains mysteriously silent ... and while the entire Pennsylvania Judiciary, the entire Legislature, and the entire state and federal government ignores.
This last year WE TOLD EVERYONE in government. They know what they are ignoring.

The unconstitutional Rule 1.6 requirement to say and do nothing is the worst kept secret in Pennsylvania.

Rule 1.6 injustice demonstrates how EVIL undermines society. Rule 1.6 cannot conceal a murder.

Pushing for a RULE 1.6 SUICIDE is totally lawful, and let's them off the hook. The corrupt achieve their reward - their goal.

I understand. Persevere. Please. EVERY PERSON MATTERS.



My list of the suicides is too long already. The sad truth is that people really don't give a damn if you live or die.

It's your own personal choice, but you can do more to expose and resolve this UNFATHOMABLE TERROR than you ever imagined.

You don't belong down here. We don't belong down here. Not Anymore. NOT EVER.

The unspoken Rule 1.6 affect which defies exposure/resolution

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information has a broad affect on victims of an injustice. The affect will deny, prevent and obstruct justice FOREVER. There is no escaping it. There is no method by which you can succeed. NONE. EVER.

A person can lose all protection of the law and all constitutional rights because of a simple injustice, even when that injustice is being concealed. The efforts to conceal that injustice can, and likely will, become far worse than the initial injustice. With no protection of the law and no constitutional rights, the person can only be described as 'victim'.

The initial injustice in my case, which was documented in 2010, had occurred in August 2007. It was concealed for three years while affecting and undermining every proceeding.

Every document which I filed with the courts was in good faith and not designed to build a massive volume of evidence. I wanted to see my children. I wanted court orders to be enforced. The volume of evidence created by my efforts to survive the concealed injustice is massive.

The case has been before 20 judges of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, yet has NEVER been before the judge responsible for the initial injustice. Judge Rhonde Lee Daniele, head of the Family Court Division.

Clearly, I believed in justice. I was not aware that the judiciary had been undermined and usurped. It took seven years of constant litigation and lawlessness until it was impossible to deny the single point of failure. The only person in the courtroom who believed in justice was ME. Their victim who could never succeed who repeatedly pointed out the fraud and lawlessness and was IGNORED.

Rule 1.6 - Confidentiality of Information is referred to by lawyers as Attorney Client privilege, but the affect of Rule 1.6 is far broader than a lawyer keeping a secret for his client. Rule 1.6 affects every legal professional, lawyer and law enforcement, and MANDATES their silence, non-exposure, participation in every effort which prevents disclosure or exposure.

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality involves four distinct aspects...
1. Confidentiality
2. Non-Disclosure
3. Fraud, and continued fraud to conceal fraud
4. No action which rectifies the fraud is allowed.

Where fraud is undeniably a crime, the American Bar Association have made fraud not only legal, but mandatory for all lawyers.

Where continued fraud and prevention of any resolution is wrong and unethical, the American Bar Association has mandated unethical activities for all lawyers within their "Ethics Rules".

Where the American Bar Association has presented their Model Rules of Professional Conduct to the state supreme courts to enact into law, their mandates to commit crime and unethical activity have caused systemic problems which undermine the judicial branch.

RULE 1.6 CAUSES THE LOSS OF JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE/IMMUNITY

In order to assure the independence of the judiciary to make decisions, judges are granted immunity from prosecution for judicial errors no matter how malicious or grievous their actions.

HOWEVER, Rule 1.6 requires that the "initial injustice' not be addressed at anytime. Ever.

Rule 1.6 allows any and every action which prevents exposure. This is most often accomplished by the judge IGNORING the issue, even when it is the only issue which the judge is considering.

Where Rule 1.6 MANDATES continued injustice to the victim who cannot succeed where the injustice may be revealed, the judge is not permitted to render an independent decision based on the facts. The lack of an ability to render an independent decision affects the immunity accorded to the judge.

Where the continued injustice defies explanation...
Where errors can not be excused...
Where single issues are ignored within decisions...
Where law is not applied...
Where appearances in court are prevented...
Where facts ON THE RECORD are ignored...
Where there is an overall disregard for the facts...
NON-DISCLOSURE is evident.
FRAUD is evident.
Any action to RECTIFY FRAUD is evident.
Rule 1.6 is evident.

While an evident and proven lack of judicial independence causes the loss of judicial immunity, the judge could be subjected to criminal and civil lawsuits, or disciplinary actions.

NO, you CANNOT win. Rule 1.6 prevents justice FOREVER.

Criminal prosecution does not occur because the District Attorney/state Attorney General are mandated by Rule 1.6. The crime will be ignored.

Federal criminal prosecution does not occur because the Department of Justice/US Attorneys and all government lawyers are mandated by Rule 1.6 under the McDade-Murtha Amendment - the local version of Rule 1.6 applies to them. The violation of constitutional rights will be ignored.

Civil lawsuit within Pennsylvania cannot be successful as the Court is mandated by Rule 1.6. The lawsuit will be avoided by the courts based on disinformation.

Federal lawsuit brought in Federal district court will not be successful as the District Court has indicated within their 'LOCAL RULES' that the local Rules of Professional Conduct apply. The lawsuit will be avoided by the courts based on disinformation.

I persist only for the purpose of removing this corrupt and unconstitutional law with the knowledge that every lawyer and court in the United States is prevented from permitting any exposure, resolution or fix to the Rule 1.6 corruption.

I persist with the knowledge that every action with the court will be obstructed, prevented or ignored.

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania had enacted the Rule into Law. Rule 1.6 prevents the Supreme Court from removing their own law as it would adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary. A self-defense mechanism within Rule 1.6.

The Pennsylvania Constitution does not permit the Supreme Court to enact a law which affects a persons substantive rights. Rule 1.6 prevents the court from addressing that it lacked the authority to enact Rule 1.6.

No lawyer may take any action to remove the law, pursuant to Rule 1.6.

No judge may take any action to remove the law, pursuant to Rule 1.6.

No Government Attorney may take any action to remove the law, pursuant to Rule 1.6 AND the McDade-Murtha Amendment which requires federal lawyers to follow the rules within the state they are investigating or working.

In accordance with the Pennsylvania Constitution, ONLY THE PENNSYLVANIA LEGISLATURE can set aside a law.
After ten months of attempts to get a meeting with State Representative Kathy Watson, we met.

As a non-lawyer in the Pennsylvania Legislature, Rep. Watson is not obligated under Rule 1.6. Rep. Watson's recognition and willingness to address this issue within the Pennsylvania Legislature put her in harms way. There is no doubt that the threat she received was real. A local state senator, a lawyer, had relayed the information about a supposed threat to her. I had made no threat. Why would I threaten the ONLY person who could fix the issue?

I persist with the fear and peril heard in the voicemail from State Representative Kathy Watson demonstrating genuine panic and jeopardy from a threat against her.

Where Representative Kathy Watson was preparing to inform the Pennsylvania Legislature of the corruption and systemic problems caused by Rule 1.6, because of a reported unsubstantiated threat, she indicated that she would take no action, no meeting, no discussion of the matter any further. EVER.

I went to the police to explain the reality of the threat which she had received. The police were already certain that I had made no threat. I would not be investigated, prosecuted, etc. The police at the same time would take no action to address the Rule 1.6 problem even where a member of the Pennsylvania Legislature had been threatened.

The systemic problem caused by the American Bar Association whose membership is permitted to do ANYTHING to continue the fraud or to conceal the fraud. The ABA with local, state and affiliated organizations existing at every level of the judiciary are permitted to obstruct, deny and prevent justice in violation of every law, every procedure and every constitutional right pursuant to Rule 1.6.

Rule 1.6, an unconstitutional law, improperly enacted without authority, has trumped the Constitution of the United States.

The American Bar Association did it. Deliberately. Had it not been deliberate and intentional, every opportunity for resolution would not be prevented.

The ABA will do everything without regard for any law to conceal how they have usurped the authority of the judiciary and undermined the judicial branch of the American Government.

It's been so long.... Finally.

I have NEWS. After a long 4 days of research reviewing the "Analysis and Interpretation of the US Constitution" and the "Homeland Security Legal Division Handbook" and many other documents available online from the US Govt, I am able to confirm every aspect of the terror that I have been put through since 2007.

Every intrusion. Every Injustice. Every single thing. The docs corroborate every action and intrusion, every fear and threat that I have been writing on this web site for what feels like decades. I am still awaiting a copy of the US Attorney Civil Rights Manual.

America must stand firmly for the nonnegotiable demands of human dignity: the rule of law; limits on the absolute power of the state; free speech; freedom of worship; equal justice; respect for people; religious and ethnic tolerance; and respect for private property.

Additionally, EVERY SINGLE ASPECT of the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 is proper and appropriate in the District Court. Third Circuit will have no trouble deciding.

An improper and unsubstantiated dismissal by a Federal District Court Judge demonstrates the collusion. The US Courts are truly corrupt. They made it impossible to fix it themselves. I'll fix it. Not so certain we can trust them with that self governing concept. The lawyers and judges have demonstrated their willful and deliberate intent to deny, prevent and obfuscate the US Justice system and undermined every state government. As a profession they violated a national trust without regard for people's dignity and lives.

I see no reason why that type of malicious corruption should be permitted to persist. What would ever cause judges to believe it was acceptable behavior to terrorize a man and deny him everything, isolate and attack and destroy him even denying his most basic Constitutional rights.

I have always believed that I was being prevented from finding documents... and prevented from information which would corroborate my experience. I finally found them.

Emotionally I don't know how I feel. I think I am disgusted at the Montgomery County Judiciary for what they deliberately did to annihilate my life. I asked in May 2013, and I'll ask them again now. WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU? Deliberately using injustice as a means of terror. The level of EVIL is incomprehensible.

I feel proud. I did the one positive thing I could do in the situation. I persevered. I survived. I WILL MAKE SURE THEY NEVER HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO DESTROY ANYONE EVER AGAIN. Humiliated beyond belief. I have self respect. I have dignity.

TAKE YOUR ILLEGAL UNETHICAL AND IMMORAL SURVEILLANCE GEAR AND GET OUT OF THE WAY.
JUSTICE IS COMING!

"I find some of what you teach suspect
because I am used to relying on intellect
but I try to open up to what I don't know
because reason says I should have died three years ago"

I did not lose my dignity. Some people cared. I will wake tomorrow from this nightmare.
Terance

www.work2bdone.com/live

Gabrielle Drexler

I have been following the case of Gabrielle Drexler since her announcement on the local news.

I am currently trying to get some information to answer a couple of questions.

Her case was strategically positioned for success. Somehow that was completely undermined.

I believe the information which would have been exposed had she been given a hearing would have exposed something so much larger than the 'scorn' woman stories.

I want to find out the truth. I'll post my thoughts on it later. I am still gathering information.

---

One word on telling a lie to any court. DON'T EVER DO IT. The lawyers who lie under Rule 1.6 are protected.

If you join them, you won't have that protection. No matter what they tell you. Remember, they lie.

If you are not guilty, NEVER PLEAD GUILTY. That lie will affect your credibility for the rest of your life.

Look at the basic message. You cannot change that decision with any credibility.