Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information has a broad affect on victims of an injustice. The affect will deny, prevent and obstruct justice FOREVER. There is no escaping it. There is no method by which you can succeed. NONE. EVER.
A person can lose all protection of the law and all constitutional rights because of a simple injustice, even when that injustice is being concealed. The efforts to conceal that injustice can, and likely will, become far worse than the initial injustice. With no protection of the law and no constitutional rights, the person can only be described as 'victim'.
The initial injustice in my case, which was documented in 2010, had occurred in August 2007. It was concealed for three years while affecting and undermining every proceeding.
Every document which I filed with the courts was in good faith and not designed to build a massive volume of evidence. I wanted to see my children. I wanted court orders to be enforced. The volume of evidence created by my efforts to survive the concealed injustice is massive.
The case has been before 20 judges of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, yet has NEVER been before the judge responsible for the initial injustice. Judge Rhonde Lee Daniele, head of the Family Court Division.
Clearly, I believed in justice. I was not aware that the judiciary had been undermined and usurped. It took seven years of constant litigation and lawlessness until it was impossible to deny the single point of failure. The only person in the courtroom who believed in justice was ME. Their victim who could never succeed who repeatedly pointed out the fraud and lawlessness and was IGNORED.
Rule 1.6 - Confidentiality of Information is referred to by lawyers as Attorney Client privilege, but the affect of Rule 1.6 is far broader than a lawyer keeping a secret for his client. Rule 1.6 affects every legal professional, lawyer and law enforcement, and MANDATES their silence, non-exposure, participation in every effort which prevents disclosure or exposure.
Rule 1.6 Confidentiality involves four distinct aspects...
1. Confidentiality
2. Non-Disclosure
3. Fraud, and continued fraud to conceal fraud
4. No action which rectifies the fraud is allowed.
Where fraud is undeniably a crime, the American Bar Association have made fraud not only legal, but mandatory for all lawyers.
Where continued fraud and prevention of any resolution is wrong and unethical, the American Bar Association has mandated unethical activities for all lawyers within their "Ethics Rules".
Where the American Bar Association has presented their Model Rules of Professional Conduct to the state supreme courts to enact into law, their mandates to commit crime and unethical activity have caused systemic problems which undermine the judicial branch.
RULE 1.6 CAUSES THE LOSS OF JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE/IMMUNITY
In order to assure the independence of the judiciary to make decisions, judges are granted immunity from prosecution for judicial errors no matter how malicious or grievous their actions.
HOWEVER, Rule 1.6 requires that the "initial injustice' not be addressed at anytime. Ever.
Rule 1.6 allows any and every action which prevents exposure. This is most often accomplished by the judge IGNORING the issue, even when it is the only issue which the judge is considering.
Where Rule 1.6 MANDATES continued injustice to the victim who cannot succeed where the injustice may be revealed, the judge is not permitted to render an independent decision based on the facts. The lack of an ability to render an independent decision affects the immunity accorded to the judge.
Where the continued injustice defies explanation...
Where errors can not be excused...
Where single issues are ignored within decisions...
Where law is not applied...
Where appearances in court are prevented...
Where facts ON THE RECORD are ignored...
Where there is an overall disregard for the facts...
NON-DISCLOSURE is evident.
FRAUD is evident.
Any action to RECTIFY FRAUD is evident.
Rule 1.6 is evident.
While an evident and proven lack of judicial independence causes the loss of judicial immunity, the judge could be subjected to criminal and civil lawsuits, or disciplinary actions.
NO, you CANNOT win. Rule 1.6 prevents justice FOREVER.
Criminal prosecution does not occur because the District Attorney/state Attorney General are mandated by Rule 1.6. The crime will be ignored.
Federal criminal prosecution does not occur because the Department of Justice/US Attorneys and all government lawyers are mandated by Rule 1.6 under the McDade-Murtha Amendment - the local version of Rule 1.6 applies to them. The violation of constitutional rights will be ignored.
Civil lawsuit within Pennsylvania cannot be successful as the Court is mandated by Rule 1.6. The lawsuit will be avoided by the courts based on disinformation.
Federal lawsuit brought in Federal district court will not be successful as the District Court has indicated within their 'LOCAL RULES' that the local Rules of Professional Conduct apply. The lawsuit will be avoided by the courts based on disinformation.
I persist only for the purpose of removing this corrupt and unconstitutional law with the knowledge that every lawyer and court in the United States is prevented from permitting any exposure, resolution or fix to the Rule 1.6 corruption.
I persist with the knowledge that every action with the court will be obstructed, prevented or ignored.
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania had enacted the Rule into Law. Rule 1.6 prevents the Supreme Court from removing their own law as it would adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary. A self-defense mechanism within Rule 1.6.
The Pennsylvania Constitution does not permit the Supreme Court to enact a law which affects a persons substantive rights. Rule 1.6 prevents the court from addressing that it lacked the authority to enact Rule 1.6.
No lawyer may take any action to remove the law, pursuant to Rule 1.6.
No judge may take any action to remove the law, pursuant to Rule 1.6.
No Government Attorney may take any action to remove the law, pursuant to Rule 1.6 AND the McDade-Murtha Amendment which requires federal lawyers to follow the rules within the state they are investigating or working.
In accordance with the Pennsylvania Constitution, ONLY THE PENNSYLVANIA LEGISLATURE can set aside a law.
After ten months of attempts to get a meeting with State Representative Kathy Watson, we met.
As a non-lawyer in the Pennsylvania Legislature, Rep. Watson is not obligated under Rule 1.6. Rep. Watson's recognition and willingness to address this issue within the Pennsylvania Legislature put her in harms way. There is no doubt that the threat she received was real. A local state senator, a lawyer, had relayed the information about a supposed threat to her. I had made no threat. Why would I threaten the ONLY person who could fix the issue?
I persist with the fear and peril heard in the voicemail from State Representative Kathy Watson demonstrating genuine panic and jeopardy from a threat against her.
Where Representative Kathy Watson was preparing to inform the Pennsylvania Legislature of the corruption and systemic problems caused by Rule 1.6, because of a reported unsubstantiated threat, she indicated that she would take no action, no meeting, no discussion of the matter any further. EVER.
I went to the police to explain the reality of the threat which she had received. The police were already certain that I had made no threat. I would not be investigated, prosecuted, etc. The police at the same time would take no action to address the Rule 1.6 problem even where a member of the Pennsylvania Legislature had been threatened.
The systemic problem caused by the American Bar Association whose membership is permitted to do ANYTHING to continue the fraud or to conceal the fraud. The ABA with local, state and affiliated organizations existing at every level of the judiciary are permitted to obstruct, deny and prevent justice in violation of every law, every procedure and every constitutional right pursuant to Rule 1.6.
Rule 1.6, an unconstitutional law, improperly enacted without authority, has trumped the Constitution of the United States.
The American Bar Association did it. Deliberately. Had it not been deliberate and intentional, every opportunity for resolution would not be prevented.
The ABA will do everything without regard for any law to conceal how they have usurped the authority of the judiciary and undermined the judicial branch of the American Government.
Showing posts with label Kathy Watson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kathy Watson. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 5, 2014
Friday, September 26, 2014
False Flag - "greatest judicial system'
When those who are informed and knowledgeable about the inner workings of anything begin to speak of it's superiority without any basis in fact and contrary to reality... yet supported by pride, arrogance and nationalism...
When they have worked with great effort to conceal the failings and the calamity caused by those failures...
When they have done nothing to correct the failure and obstructed and prevented correction of problems and prevented exposure of problems...
When the disinformation comes as a non-sequitur, that totally unnecessary thrown-in statement...
It is a false flag.
You are witnessing and experiencing disinformation created to conceal facts. Recently demonstrated by Attorney General Eric Holder as he resigned - seems he has his eye on a position within the Supreme Court - a possible reward for his not exposing the complete corruption of the US Judicial system. Attorney General Eric Holder knows the issue. he was involved. He has testified to Congress on both sides of the issue. He was informed of findings and filings since the discovery of the issue in July 2013. And, HE IGNORED IT.
The United States does not have the greatest judicial system in the world.
Of the 97 countries in the index...
[Source: The World Justice Project www.WorldJusticeproject.org ]
The US is NOT EVEN in the Top 10 in any category.
Usually, the problem has to be big enough to warrant the lies.
In the United States the problem with the judicial system is massive. It is at such an incomprehensible scale that the government prefers to crumble into anarchy than to address how the judiciary has caused themselves to be undermined and the entire government has become undone.
The US government is too ashamed to correct it. Every government representative contacted about the judiciary has failed to take any corrective action for the failure. It is as if the US Constitution never existed. The US Constitution and the Rule of Law is IGNORED without consequence.
The US government is leaving every citizen AT RISK in the unchecked system after allowing over 10% of the population to experience the extreme injustice. Over 40 million people have been victimized by the corruption of the American judicial system without mercy. Survivors are 1) Homeless/Destitute, 2) Incarcerated or 3) Suicides. They become "The Disenfranchised".
Occasionally the media notices and the story of unconstitutional injustices are revealed. BUT, there is no consequence. The victim gains nothing from the exposure and will be further terrorized. No one looked for the root cause of the problem - or the root cause of why everyone thought it appropriate to IGNORE the Rule of Law and the US Constitution.
The Foreclosure Crisis
Kids for Cash
Judicial Corruption
Due Process Failures
Injustice - affected individuals have no protection under any law in any court or forum
Family Courts - the only court where a person who has committed no crime can lose everything
US Congress does NOTHING [except campaign to keep their office]
US President fails to enforce laws
US Court make decisions beyond their authority
WHAT HAPPENED???
US courts had functioned for 200 years. What changed?
Rule 1.6 was enacted by every state supreme court into law - without any constitutional review, without any construction by a legislature, without any governor. Enacted quietly and without explanation of the necessity from 1984 (New Jersey) to 2009 (Maine).
Rule 1.6 is incorporated into federal practice by "Local Rules" in every Federal District Court and Federal Appeals Court.
Rule 1.6 is incorporated into federal law by the McDade-Murtha Amendment preventing ALL federal agencies and attorneys from prosecuting or exposing judicial corruption or constitutional violations.
Rule 1.6 undermines the Rule of Law, the US Constitution and every state Constitution.
Rule 1.6 undermines judicial independence.
Prior to being enacted into law, confidentiality was a discretionary decision of personal ethics for lawyers.
Rule 1.6 is Confidentiality of Information - an aggressively enforced mandate of silence where the information
– would affect the integrity of the judiciary,
– would reveal the misconduct of their own office,
– would expose individual liability,
– would adversely affect any client.
Once an act of judicial misconduct or injustice occurs, the litigant has effectively lost ALL of their rights and has no protection under the laws, the constitutions and is further victimized without mercy because no one may affect the integrity of the judiciary.
An act by the judiciary, EVERY state judiciary, which defies exposure and resolution has undermined the entire US government. The American people see the constitutional problems and the failure to enforce the law but are kept blind in misinformed nationalistic pride and arrogance. They fail to recognize that once they have been denied justice, they are no longer a part of the unaffected majority. They become part of the disenfranchised group without any rights and denied any voice. They are destined to become 1) Homeless/Destitute 2) Incarcerated or 3) Suicide.
Federalism further prevents the Federal Government from taking action while an improperly enacted and unconstitutional state law hinders the function of the state and federal government. Only a Federal Court has authority to address the unconstitutional law.
The Federal Judiciary sacrificed their integrity when dismissing the matter before the court through their own irrelevant fiction. Rule 1.6 would also conceal if the issue never went to any judge and the paperwork was all the misdirection of the lawyers working for the courts. Everything was done on paper - and without signatures.
After the first meeting where a Pennsylvania State Representative offers to address the Rule 1.6 issue, Representative Kathy Watson gets a false warning about threats against her and her office staff. The information of the threat relayed from a Pennsylvania State Senator. Kathy Watson cancels any further meetings in a phone message where you could hear the fear and peril in her voice. Kathy Watson calls the police who go to her office to take a report. The police know there is nothing to the report.
That FALSE ALLEGATION has prevented further meetings with any Pennsylvania government officials. No one responds to any communication. A successful disinformation campaign based on the affirmation that JUSTICE IS COMING. Only the guilty could be threatened by that affirmation... and Kathy Watson had been quick to understand, interested, helpful and eager to resolve the issue. A peculiar report from Senator Tomlinson who had never returned a phone call or letter and had never met with us on the issue. Why would Senator Tomlinson scare Representative Watson? Her voice mail message demonstrated her 'fear'.
After hearing her message, I went to the police because of the level of panic and terror I heard in her voice. The threat was real, but I was not the one who threatened Representative Watson.
Meetings occurred with Pennsylvania Senator Chuck McIlhinney starting in December 2013, reports are he was directed to IGNORE the issue and stop any further meetings on the topic.
Kathy Watson and Chuck McIlhinney are NOT required to follow the Rules of Professional Conduct. They are lawfully permitted to act.
Indeed, it is only the Legislature which has the constitutional authority to suspend the law. The last remaining loophole, unless the county sheriffs realize they have been played into their diminished role. ONLY non-lawyer members of the Pennsylvania state legislature may act to suspend Rule 1.6 in Pennsylvania.
The Pennsylvania Governor through his counsel has written a letter which contains so much of the scripted misinformation it may take a volume to respond to it all. A tactic which is all too familiar. It was litigation by overwhelming chaotic misinformation and fraud which lead to the issue being experienced and exposed - a never-ending, judicial bench-clearing divorce - since 2007 over 20 judges in the unresolved matter.
When lawyers use lawyers, they do it with intent. Rule 1.6 mandates the lawyer conceal information for their client. It suggests a deception. Heck, Rule 1.6 mandates that deception by lawyers. There was no surprise when the scripted misinformation from the governor was identical to the scripted misinformation observed previously. The surprise was that Senator McIlhinney accepted the misinformation when he knew it was incorrect.
The news media remains oddly silent.
When they have worked with great effort to conceal the failings and the calamity caused by those failures...
When they have done nothing to correct the failure and obstructed and prevented correction of problems and prevented exposure of problems...
When the disinformation comes as a non-sequitur, that totally unnecessary thrown-in statement...
It is a false flag.
You are witnessing and experiencing disinformation created to conceal facts. Recently demonstrated by Attorney General Eric Holder as he resigned - seems he has his eye on a position within the Supreme Court - a possible reward for his not exposing the complete corruption of the US Judicial system. Attorney General Eric Holder knows the issue. he was involved. He has testified to Congress on both sides of the issue. He was informed of findings and filings since the discovery of the issue in July 2013. And, HE IGNORED IT.
The United States does not have the greatest judicial system in the world.
Of the 97 countries in the index...
| The US ranks 17th in Limited Government Powers | #1 is DENMARK |
| The US ranks 18th in Absence of Corruption | #1 is SWEDEN |
| The US ranks 22nd in Order and Security | #1 is SINGAPORE |
| The US ranks 25th in Fundamental Rights | #1 is SWEDEN |
| The US ranks 13th in Open Government | #1 is SWEDEN |
| The US ranks 19th in Regulatory Enforcement | #1 is SWEDEN |
| The US ranks 22nd in Civil Justice | #1 is NORWAY |
| The US ranks 26th in Criminal Justice | #1 is DENMARK |
[Source: The World Justice Project www.WorldJusticeproject.org ]
The US is NOT EVEN in the Top 10 in any category.Usually, the problem has to be big enough to warrant the lies.
In the United States the problem with the judicial system is massive. It is at such an incomprehensible scale that the government prefers to crumble into anarchy than to address how the judiciary has caused themselves to be undermined and the entire government has become undone.
The US government is too ashamed to correct it. Every government representative contacted about the judiciary has failed to take any corrective action for the failure. It is as if the US Constitution never existed. The US Constitution and the Rule of Law is IGNORED without consequence.
The US government is leaving every citizen AT RISK in the unchecked system after allowing over 10% of the population to experience the extreme injustice. Over 40 million people have been victimized by the corruption of the American judicial system without mercy. Survivors are 1) Homeless/Destitute, 2) Incarcerated or 3) Suicides. They become "The Disenfranchised".
Occasionally the media notices and the story of unconstitutional injustices are revealed. BUT, there is no consequence. The victim gains nothing from the exposure and will be further terrorized. No one looked for the root cause of the problem - or the root cause of why everyone thought it appropriate to IGNORE the Rule of Law and the US Constitution.
The Foreclosure Crisis
Kids for Cash
Judicial Corruption
Due Process Failures
Injustice - affected individuals have no protection under any law in any court or forum
Family Courts - the only court where a person who has committed no crime can lose everything
US Congress does NOTHING [except campaign to keep their office]
US President fails to enforce laws
US Court make decisions beyond their authority
WHAT HAPPENED???
US courts had functioned for 200 years. What changed?
Rule 1.6 was enacted by every state supreme court into law - without any constitutional review, without any construction by a legislature, without any governor. Enacted quietly and without explanation of the necessity from 1984 (New Jersey) to 2009 (Maine).
Rule 1.6 is incorporated into federal practice by "Local Rules" in every Federal District Court and Federal Appeals Court.
Rule 1.6 is incorporated into federal law by the McDade-Murtha Amendment preventing ALL federal agencies and attorneys from prosecuting or exposing judicial corruption or constitutional violations.
Rule 1.6 undermines the Rule of Law, the US Constitution and every state Constitution.
Rule 1.6 undermines judicial independence.
Prior to being enacted into law, confidentiality was a discretionary decision of personal ethics for lawyers.
Rule 1.6 is Confidentiality of Information - an aggressively enforced mandate of silence where the information
– would affect the integrity of the judiciary,
– would reveal the misconduct of their own office,
– would expose individual liability,
– would adversely affect any client.
Once an act of judicial misconduct or injustice occurs, the litigant has effectively lost ALL of their rights and has no protection under the laws, the constitutions and is further victimized without mercy because no one may affect the integrity of the judiciary.
An act by the judiciary, EVERY state judiciary, which defies exposure and resolution has undermined the entire US government. The American people see the constitutional problems and the failure to enforce the law but are kept blind in misinformed nationalistic pride and arrogance. They fail to recognize that once they have been denied justice, they are no longer a part of the unaffected majority. They become part of the disenfranchised group without any rights and denied any voice. They are destined to become 1) Homeless/Destitute 2) Incarcerated or 3) Suicide.
Federalism further prevents the Federal Government from taking action while an improperly enacted and unconstitutional state law hinders the function of the state and federal government. Only a Federal Court has authority to address the unconstitutional law.
The Federal Judiciary sacrificed their integrity when dismissing the matter before the court through their own irrelevant fiction. Rule 1.6 would also conceal if the issue never went to any judge and the paperwork was all the misdirection of the lawyers working for the courts. Everything was done on paper - and without signatures.
After the first meeting where a Pennsylvania State Representative offers to address the Rule 1.6 issue, Representative Kathy Watson gets a false warning about threats against her and her office staff. The information of the threat relayed from a Pennsylvania State Senator. Kathy Watson cancels any further meetings in a phone message where you could hear the fear and peril in her voice. Kathy Watson calls the police who go to her office to take a report. The police know there is nothing to the report. That FALSE ALLEGATION has prevented further meetings with any Pennsylvania government officials. No one responds to any communication. A successful disinformation campaign based on the affirmation that JUSTICE IS COMING. Only the guilty could be threatened by that affirmation... and Kathy Watson had been quick to understand, interested, helpful and eager to resolve the issue. A peculiar report from Senator Tomlinson who had never returned a phone call or letter and had never met with us on the issue. Why would Senator Tomlinson scare Representative Watson? Her voice mail message demonstrated her 'fear'.
After hearing her message, I went to the police because of the level of panic and terror I heard in her voice. The threat was real, but I was not the one who threatened Representative Watson.
Meetings occurred with Pennsylvania Senator Chuck McIlhinney starting in December 2013, reports are he was directed to IGNORE the issue and stop any further meetings on the topic. Kathy Watson and Chuck McIlhinney are NOT required to follow the Rules of Professional Conduct. They are lawfully permitted to act.
Indeed, it is only the Legislature which has the constitutional authority to suspend the law. The last remaining loophole, unless the county sheriffs realize they have been played into their diminished role. ONLY non-lawyer members of the Pennsylvania state legislature may act to suspend Rule 1.6 in Pennsylvania.
The Pennsylvania Governor through his counsel has written a letter which contains so much of the scripted misinformation it may take a volume to respond to it all. A tactic which is all too familiar. It was litigation by overwhelming chaotic misinformation and fraud which lead to the issue being experienced and exposed - a never-ending, judicial bench-clearing divorce - since 2007 over 20 judges in the unresolved matter.When lawyers use lawyers, they do it with intent. Rule 1.6 mandates the lawyer conceal information for their client. It suggests a deception. Heck, Rule 1.6 mandates that deception by lawyers. There was no surprise when the scripted misinformation from the governor was identical to the scripted misinformation observed previously. The surprise was that Senator McIlhinney accepted the misinformation when he knew it was incorrect.
The news media remains oddly silent.
Friday, June 13, 2014
If you SEE something, SAY something.
 Senator Charles McIlhennynon-Lawyer Why has Senator McIlhenny neglected to inform the Pennsylvania Legislature of the Constitutional Challenge? |
 Senator Pat Toomeynon-LAWYER Met with member of his staff - June 2014. |
 Senator Bob CaseyLAWYER Just can't get a meeting. |
 Attorney General Eric HolderLAWYER Could resolve the matter in a minute. The single most powerful decision maker in the matter. Just can't get a meeting. |
 Attorney General Kathleen KaneLAWYER It would seem that Kane's staff has undermined her sense of justice. |
 Senator Stewart GreenleafLAWYER Judiciary Committee Chief of Staff notified. Just can't get a meeting. |
| Governor Tom Corbett LAWYER Hand delivered. Just can't get a meeting. |
 Newt Gingrichnon-Lawyer Hand delivered. Awaiting response. |
 Representative Kate HarperLAWYER Knows all about the corruption and the Challenge of Rule 1.6. BUT, hasn't done anything. |
 Representative Todd StephensLAWYER Knows all about the corruption and the Challenge of Rule 1.6. BUT, hasn't done anything ... but offer to do something which he never does. OY!. |
 Representative Kathy WatsonLAWYER REFUSES to meet on the issue. |
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)