Letter to Pennsylvania Senate Judiciary Committee

July 31, 2014

Pennsylvania Senate Judiciary Committee
Senator Stewart Greenleaf, Chariman
Harrisburg, PA

Committee Members
John. C. Rafferty, Jr., Joseph B. Scarnati, III, Richard L. Alloway, II, John H. Eichelberger, Jr., John R. Gordner, Dominic Pileggi, Randy Vulakovich, Gene Yaw, Daylin Leach, Lisa M. Boscola, Lawrence M. Farnese, Jr., Wayne D. Fontana, Michael J. Stack

For Distribution to all members and all Senators and Representatives.


Senators,

Please permit us to present a document sent to President Barack Obama which has national impact relating to the judiciary. The situation has evolved to where it defies any corrective action by the judiciary. Since 2013, Senator McIlhinney had been informed and holding meetings with us on this issue.

In August 2013, a Constitutional Challenge to Rule 1.6 was filed and served upon the Attorney General for every state, fifty six in all, to address a law enacted by the state supreme courts without benefit of the state legislature or the signature of any governor. The unconstitutional aspects were not taken into consideration during construction of the law.

Every state attorney general failed to respond to the summons and challenge by the deadline, yet the district court refused to accept or acknowledge their deliberate default action. The Challenge was concealed and then dismissed based on unsubstantiated doctrine and fictional misinformation. That decision only served to harm the integrity of the court. The very integrity which the Challenge had sought to restore while re-securing the constitutional rights of all Americans.

The national foreclosure crisis is an example of Rule 1.6 confidentiality undermining the judiciary and removing people from their homes based on fraudulent and robo-signed documentation. Pennsylvania’s Kids for Cash scandal demonstrated Rule 1.6 even more cleanly.

The judiciary is mandated to follow the very law which is being challenged and to protect the integrity of the court by sacrificing the integrity of the court. A seriously flawed logic which prevents lawyers and law enforcement from addressing judicial corruption and injustice within the state and federal judicial system. The federal courts follow the local (state) Rules of Professional Conduct where Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information is an indirect law which undermines the government and trumps EVERY law including the US Constitution.

Addressing the injustice of Rule 1.6 is an inevitability. Facing it responsibly will affect the public reaction to this realization. We ask your involvement, or where your direct action is ‘unlawful’, whatever assistance of support and resources which will permit us to succeed for the betterment of the nation in the best interests of every American.

We would appreciate the opportunity to meet with you to discuss the issue in further detail.

Sincerely,

Terance Healy
Todd M. Krautheim

If you SEE something, SAY something.

Senator Charles McIlhenny non-Lawyer Why has Senator McIlhenny neglected to inform the Pennsylvania Legislature of the Constitutional Challenge?

Senator Pat Toomey non-LAWYER Met with member of his staff - June 2014.

Senator Bob Casey LAWYER Just can't get a meeting.

Attorney General Eric Holder LAWYER Could resolve the matter in a minute. The single most powerful decision maker in the matter. Just can't get a meeting.

Attorney General Kathleen Kane LAWYER It would seem that Kane's staff has undermined her sense of justice.

Senator Stewart Greenleaf LAWYER Judiciary Committee Chief of Staff notified. Just can't get a meeting.

Governor Tom Corbett LAWYER Hand delivered. Just can't get a meeting.

Newt Gingrich non-Lawyer Hand delivered. Awaiting response.

Representative Kate Harper LAWYER Knows all about the corruption and the Challenge of Rule 1.6. BUT, hasn't done anything.

Representative Todd Stephens LAWYER Knows all about the corruption and the Challenge of Rule 1.6. BUT, hasn't done anything ... but offer to do something which he never does. OY!.

Representative Kathy Watson LAWYER REFUSES to meet on the issue.