tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-84953499824476434242024-03-14T02:22:27.424-04:00The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6Every American is just one act of injustice away from lawfully losing their constitutional rights and protection of the law. Once triggered sacrificing the integrity of the judiciary and the reputation of lawyers. Injustice is leveraged for further injustice with no escape. Ever.
RULE 1.6 Confidentiality is the cause - improperly enacted in EVERY state.
Profiting from injustice... the authors of the rule... The American Bar Association and it's members.Terancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.comBlogger450125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8495349982447643424.post-11699960600637975692015-02-17T04:55:00.000-05:002015-02-19T16:11:24.702-05:00Injustice Pennsylvania Style (serves 12 million)<strong>THE ISSUE:</strong><br/>The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has made it illegal to remove an unconstitutional law they enacted (without authority).<br/><br/>The Pennsylvania Legislature has the exclusive constitutional authority to SUSPEND a law.<br/><br/><strong>PROVISO:</strong><br/>Lawyers are permitted and encouraged to say or do anything which will prevent the situation from being rectified. All fraud in the furtherance of their effort is excused and held confidential… UNLESS, they kill someone.<br/><br/><center>Improperly enacted and unconstitutional <br/>- ONE LAW - "undeniably unconstitutional"<br/>undermined the judiciary and usurped their authority<br/>mandating confidentiality and excusing fraud to prevent exposure.<br/>Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information.</center><br/><br/><center>The recipe that hooked the American Judiciary - judges can't get enough.<br/><em>They can't control themselves and can't say why.</em></center><br/><br/><center><table width=85%><tr><td><br/>Prepare allowing to quietly simmer for 30 years. <br/><br/>DO NOT BRING TO FULL BOIL or you won't be able to keep the crowds away.<br/><br/>Add additional fraud, as required, to maintain consistent base and extend the recipe.<br/><br/>Caution when serving to young children - they don't say how you make it, but won't keep the secret - <em>Luzerne County Kids for Cash.</em><br/><br/>Over-sharing can result in widespread foreclosures, homelessness and incarceration without possibility of release.<br/><br/>If you are feeling suicidal thoughts and tendencies, loss of relationships, financial hardship, your paranoia is real and not imagined. [CONFIDENTIAL] <br/><br/>Will NEVER cause death (without full disclosure). <em>It won't kill you and we won't say why!</em><br/></td></tr></table></center><br/><br/><center><h2>NOBODY SERVES UP INJUSTICE AND CORRUPTION LIKE THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION.<br/>It would be illegal if they tried!</h2></center><br/><br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/kathleen_kane_divorce11.png"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/kathleen_kane_divorce11.png" alt="kathleen_kane_divorce1" width="550" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-11113" /></a><br/><br/>It required two 'secret court orders from unidentified courts' to keep PA Attorney General Kathleen Kane from saying anything more.<br/><br/>The 'unidentified court' could not order the Attorney General as that would violate the law which established the Office of the Attorney General and the PA Constitution. (Overreach into The Legislative and Executive Branches)<br/><br/>The 'unidentified court' ordered the person, Kathleen Kane, to silently comply and participate in the denial of constitutional rights AND denial of the rule of law while facing the FULL LIABILITY WITHOUT IMMUNITY. A litigant had PROVEN the Judiciary undermined and usurped by the ABA had violated his rights concealed by Rule 1.6 confidentiality.<br/><br/>The litigant, Terance Healy, had survived <a href="http://www.work2bdone.com/live" target="_blank">A Terroristic Divorce</a> of incomprehensible injustice and corruption before 20 judges in Montgomery County, PA. Unexplained and ignored pursuant to Rule 1.6 confidentiality. Rule 1.6 Injustice. UNCONSTITUTIONAL INJUSTICE IGNORED.<br/><br/>Rule 1.6 unconstitutional - improperly enacted into law - when proven to be 'no law' was written into those 'secret orders from unidentified courts' to continue the denial of his rights, with liability and blame placed specifically upon the person Kathleen Kane, NOT the Attorney General.<br/><br/>Where the personal liability had already been created by fraud committed in her name to conceal the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 in federal court and served to EVERY state attorney general. They had DEFAULTED. <br/><br/>Kathleen Kane, the person, faces full liability without immunity for the denial of the constitutional rights and INJUSTICE towards EVERY AMERICAN because fraud in her name concealed by confidentiality was committed to conceal the unconstitutionality of "Rule 1.6 Confidentiality". <br/><br/>Rule 1.6 INJUSTICE and CORRUPTION. ... has been enacted in EVERY state. AMERICAN INJUSTICE.<br/>Only the American Bar Association has the resources and motivation and the 'judiciary' and membership to overthrow government. Edward Snowden saw so much more than Americans have been told.<br/><br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/KaneResp2.png"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/KaneResp2.png" alt="KaneResp2" width="500" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-11111" /></a><br/><br/>Available in EVERY state each with it's own flavor but called the same name - RULE 1.6 Confidentiality of Information - SO UNCONSTITUTIONAL IT MIGHT COME CLOSE TO KILLING YOU! <em>(but it won't because that would require disclosure.) <br/></em><br/><br/>Since 1998, the 'Federal'-style has been 'the secret indulgence you gotta taste to believe" of government investigators and lawyers in every department and agency.<br/><br/><strong>Copyright 1984-2009 & 2015 by The American Bar Association. Strictly and Aggressively enforced. </strong><br/><em>Violation will be alleged to DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA, DHS, DEA, The Secret Service and local and state law enforcement (intermittently, concurrently and chaotically). </em><br/><br/>Made available through the state supreme courts. See where your state joined the INJUSTICE!<br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Spread.png"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Spread.png" alt="Spread" width="550" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-11104" /></a>Terancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8495349982447643424.post-14817133976539111122015-02-16T06:57:00.000-05:002015-02-19T16:11:24.678-05:00Pennsylvania Senators advised Rule 1.6 Injustice happensThis morning, the Pennsylvania Senators were advised of the continued injustice, loss of constitutional rights with no protection of the law which is ignored and concealed by Rule 1.6 Confidentiality without possibility of relief.<br/><br/>I am not trying to gain defendants for a federal lawsuit against all of those people who conspired to deny my constitutional rights? even when not excused by an unconstitutional law? <br/><br/>THE ISSUE:<br/>The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has made it illegal to remove an unconstitutional law they enacted (without authority).<br/><br/>The Pennsylvania Legislature has the exclusive constitutional authority to SUSPEND a law. <br/><br/>PROVISO:<br/>Lawyers are permitted and encouraged to say or do anything which will prevent the situation from being rectified. All fraud in the furtherance of their effort is excused and held confidential... UNLESS, they kill someone. <br/><br/><center>Welcome Senators to Rule 1.6</center><br/><br/><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1187.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/69.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1198.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1077.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1698.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1227.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/179.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1197.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1087.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/76.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/251.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/254.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1049.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1078.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1183.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1080.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1041.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/96.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/173.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1689.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/152.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1629.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/278.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/991.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1696.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/22.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1121.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/974.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1036.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/283.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/972.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1234.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1630.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1185.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1697.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/277.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1628.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/151.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/132.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1189.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1090.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1682.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1188.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/297.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1631.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/153.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/190.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1186.jpg" width="55" height="77"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/64.jpg" width="55" height="77"><br/><br/>This is bigger than one man's rights. This is a national issue - an egregious rape of the public trust. A judiciary held hostage. Judges sacrificing integrity to conceal injustice. <br/><br/>All accomplished by ONE LAW improperly enacted preventing the constitutionally protected rights of a litigant.<br/><br/>The requirement for non-disclosure and confidentiality, with permission to commit fraud in the furtherance and fraud to prevent it from being rectified - also held confidential demonstrates the power of the law to avoid public attention.<br/><br/>Whistleblowers call it RETALIATION. Litigants see CORRUPTION. <br/>Defendants experience INJUSTICE. Lawyers call it 'attorney-client privilege'.<br/><br/>Robert Kutak called them the 'fraud provisions' and "necessary". They were removed from the ABA's Rules Of Professional Conduct <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1983/01/25/obituaries/rj-kutak-leader-in-bar-ethics-work-dies.html" target="_blank">after Kutak's sudden heart attack</a>.<br/><br/>RULE 1.6 Confidentiality of Information - the actions under the rule boil down to <em>"fraud in the furtherance of fraud, concealed"</em> whether indicated, or held confidential when not.<br/><br/><h2>ATTORNEY GENERAL</h2><br/>Fraud to prevent any resolution has the Pennsylvania Attorney General ORDERED by two secret orders from unidentified court to conduct no investigation and ignore the duties and responsibilities of the Office of the Attorney General.<br/><br/><center><table width=95%><tr><td>TWO SECRET ORDERS FROM UNIDENTIFIED COURTS</td></tr><br/><tr><td><br/>The improper secret orders cause Kathleen Kane to be subject to personal liability for damages and relief. There is no defense or immunity where a person is denying constitutionally protected rights.<br/><br/>Any law which would require that is unconstitutional. No law. Court Orders are not permitted to deny constitutionally protected rights. Tangible secret or imaginary, that's unconstitutional.<br/><br/>Kathleen Kane's liability is personal. The mandatory participation in the denial of rights, the conspiracy to deny rights, failure to perform the duties of the Attorney General and a long list of other offenses. <br/><br/>The law does not allow a secret order to affect the 'OFFICE' of the Attorney General. <br/><br/>These orders are personal. Creating a personal liability. The lawyers have clearly indicated they are representing Kathleen Kane, the person, and NOT the Attorney General.<br/><br/>I understand 'personal' and recognize that an order issued to Kathleen Kane requiring 'confidentiality of information' acknowledges the unconstitutional Rule 1.6 removing it broadly. Immediately ordering the same 'confidentiality of information' upon Kane - excluding the litigant and requiring non-disclosure leaves Kane without standing to challenge constitutionality of the improper secret order.<br/><br/>Is something still unconstitutional when you can't see it? Of course, it is.<br/><br/>Where Rule 1.6 had been concealed within the Rules of Professional Conduct while it undermined the courts, sacrificed the judge's integrity and every decision was cruel farce. The unconstitutional law was found, documented and raised to the attention of the court where it continued to corrupt, pervert and deny justice and constitutionally protected rights.<br/><br/>Now, 'UNCONSTITUTIONAL Rule 1.6' has been renamed 'secret orders from unidentified courts', and part of those orders is the requirement to conceal the orders. It took 30 years to find it last time it was hidden.<br/><br/>Is something still unconstitutional when it is concealed? Of course, it is. <br/><em>The US Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land and any law which deprives a person of protections of the US Constitution is no law. The same applies to Orders and to 'secret orders'.</em><br/><br/>It was the collateral effect of the confidentiality which caused the loss of rights and deprivation of the rule of law... which provided my standing to challenge it. Standing is personal.<br/> <br/>Without damages and a cause for relief, Kathleen Kane would have lacked standing to challenge Rule 1.6 and was additionally prevented by Rule 1.6 from disclosure. I had the damages and cause for relief and no mandate of non-disclosure which allowed standing to challenge it. <br/><br/>The renamed "secret orders from unidentified courts' placed the same mandates upon Kathleen Kane as Rule 1.6 with one addition - an order of confidentiality and non-disclosure.<br/><br/>The 'secret orders' require Kathleen Kane to participate in actions known to have caused the loss of MY rights and the deprivation of the rule of law FOR ME. Kathleen Kane may not have personal damages sufficient for standing to challenge the secret order WHILE MANDATED to actions which deprive me of my rights.<br/><br/>I am prevented from challenging the unconstitutional effect of a 'secret orders from unidentified courts' where the order is concealed, hidden and prevented from discovery by design. <br/><br/>It took 30 years, and 8 years of injustice, ignored rights, denied and prevented any custody or visitation without explanation, complete disregard and failure to follow the law, with courts conditional enforcement of orders against me to the fullest extent while dismissing every attempt which would benefit me, conducting what could only be described as a judicial farce which involved the entire Montgomery County Judicial Bench and utilized every available county resource to annihilate my life until based on the idea that people obey bad laws, I found the ONE LAW which when applied trumped every other procedure and law including the US Constitution... concealed within the Rules of Professional Conduct which applied to lawyers and legal professionals, a law which I did not have to follow had collaterally annihilated my life.<br/><br/>Homeless, destitute, a lifetime of possessions stolen or thrown away with no recourse but to return to the corrupted with expectations of justice which completely contradicted the experience. Injustice prevailed.<br/><br/>Without protection of the law and while constitutional rights are ignored, there can be no expectation of relief. I survived. I found their bad law. I proved it. They dismissed facts and denied my efforts. Their loss of integrity was epidemic, the injustice was not systemic. The corruption and injustice all centered on ONE LAW - which caused the injustice while preventing any escape.<br/><br/>The discovery should have been welcomed by a judiciary held hostage without independence and madated to ignore the law and the facts while spreading injustice. Where required to participate in efforts to conceal the sedition and those responsible for undermining the judiciary in every state and federally.<br/><br/>I am only trying to survive a divorce. I had no expectation or reason to think that I would discover that the entire government of the United States had been effectively overthrown by the American Bar Association through misuse of authority and abuses of power demanded of judges held hostage by court staff permitted to commit fraud in the furtherance of fraud and fraud to prevent a situation from being rectified. EVER.<br/><br/>There was no reason to believe I deserved the mistreatment and disrespect, and no reason for the failures of everyone from whom I sought help... until I found ONE LAW which explained it all. <br/><br/>Recognizing the unique situation where I had standing to address this abomination - improperly enacted without authority by the state supreme courts, I persist and persevere. <br/><br/>Placing the same CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION within corrupt 'secret orders from unidentified courts' prevented from my discovery and hidden from my view while growing an expanding liability for the person who was ordered by the unidentified. <br/></td></tr><br/><tr><td>Did the best legal minds in the country... 400,000+ membership... Did you expect another 30 years for just hiding Rule 1.6 and renaming it 'secret orders from unidentified courts"? <br/><br/>Their tremendous disrespect aside.... AMERICA HAS NOTICED THE INJUSTICE. <br/>The 'worst kept secret in Pennsylvania' is not going anywhere.</td></tr></table></center><br/><br/><table><tr><td>The Brilliance of Governor Wolf is to be appreciated. I'm alive. I saw the issue instantly.<br/><br/>Fraud in the furtherance, the law excuses and conceals it, and mandates non-disclosure.<br/><br/>The victims of judicial misconduct, corruption and injustice survive to be further attacked.<br/>No escape, the available outcome 1) Homeless/Destitute 2) Incarcerated or 3) Suicide. <br/>THE LAW IS FOLLOWED. <br/><br/>Disclosure is permitted where the target will be killed. <br/><br/>No wonder the District Attorneys responded with aggression and paranoia on Friday.<br/><br/>The folks on Death Row who have not been executed ... ALIVE.<br/><br/>Because disclosure is permitted if they are to be killed, the victim of injustice lives.<br/>IT'S THE LAW.</td></tr><br/><tr><td>How can the DA explain when prevented by Rule 1.6 from explaining?<br/>Good luck with that. Maybe you can get ideas from <a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/2015/01/commissioner-bruce-castor-schooled-in-how-to-really-hurt-you-and-to-screw-others/" title="Commissioner Bruce Castor “schooled in how to really hurt you” and “to [screw] others”" target="_blank">the Bruce Castor manifesto</a>.</td></tr></table><br/><br/>Kane's involvement in the conspiracy to deny rights goes back to the Constitutional Challenge in Federal Court where actions (purported to be on her behalf) AFTER DEFAULT BY EVERY STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, resulted in unsubstantiated dismissal of the matter. <br/><br/><h2>It was 1.6'd.</h2><br/>The participants undermining the matter were committing fraud in the furtherance of fraud to conceal the unconstitutional LAW and it's injustice. While demonstrating their ability to interfere with the administration of the courts, obstruct justice, and deny access to the courts,... <br/><br/>Rule 1.6 would require non-disclosure of the fraud committed in the name of the Attorney General... it would also prevent prosecution of the crime.<br/><br/>The only way for the Constitutional Challenge to be successful was for a DEFAULT by the attorneys general, and a ruling by the judge. <br/><br/>The DEFAULT was appropriate where any action by the attorneys general would violate Rule 1.6 - disclosure is not permitted. Also, it would not be a decision made by the judge obligated by Rule 1.6 confidentiality. A declaration of UNCONSTITUTIONAL would abide by the law until it wasn't a law.<br/><br/><h2>JUDICIARY HELD HOSTAGE</h2><br/>The staff violations were unexplained YET revealed a JUDICIARY HELD HOSTAGE by lawyers permitted to conceal their fraud even when by the very LAW being challenged. The staff were members of the organization responsible for providing the law to the supreme courts to enact. <br/><br/>There was no review by a legislature or signature of a governor, and there could be no review by a judiciary embarrassed by their action which violated the public trust and the US Constitution.<br/><br/>TRAPPED. <br/><br/>A situation which the judiciary could not reveal pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of <br/>the Rules Of Professional Conduct, a minimal ethical standard for the legal profession which lacked ethics, morals and legality where it permitted fraud to conceal prior fraud and to avoid rectifying the situation and mandated confidentiality.<br/><br/>Concealed by Rule 1.6 while attributing responsibility to Kathleen Kane creates a personal liability and provides standing where it has affected the rights of every American, in every state. <br/><br/><center><hr width=75%></center><br/><br/>The secret orders cause liability to grow to such enormous proportions, that to protect their families assets, a person might consider filing for divorce.<br/><br/>Kathleen Kane stood up for everyone's right to marry. Personally, and as Attorney General, Kathleen Kane would not support an unconstitutional law. <br/><br/>NOW, events involving ANOTHER UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW is causing her to be deprived of the very thing which she championed for others. Her marriage.<br/><br/>... She cannot say because that would violate secret court orders. SECRET COURT ORDERS? When did this become acceptable? legal? ethical? moral? It's not acceptable, it's ignored.<br/><br/>This is AMERICA where the judiciary has been undermined, their authority usurped, and the US Constitution ignored. American Injustice.<br/><br/><center><hr width=75%></center><br/><br/><h2>WHAT ABOUT THOSE SECRET ORDERS</h2><br/>Real, imaginary, signed? No one knows.<br/><br/>If those secret orders are signed, the judge may have done so under duress, a coercion concealed by Rule 1.6 as fraud in the furtherance.<br/><br/>Where unsigned, they exist as another concealed fraud in the furtherance to prevent any examination of the Rule 1.6 corruption.<br/><br/>Where there is no logical reason for the judiciary to want to remain corrupted, undermined and without the necessary independence to decide a matter. The sacrifice of their integrity has been great and the country has witnessed the INJUSTICE. <br/><br/>Evidence of Control of the Judiciary ... or ... a Cry for Help from a Judiciary Held Hostage.<br/><br/><H2>THE PEOPLE COULD ADDRESS THIS... IF THE MEDIA WOULD REPORT IT.</h2><br/><br/>The media is not a hostage, but it is being controlled. The media's failure to present the Rule 1.6 issue has been clear. They were told by their lawyers not to present the story.<br/><br/><h2>UP WITH THIS WE SHALL NOT PUT</h2><br/>Everything points to the beneficiaries of INJUSTICE, the American Bar Association, the author, with affiliated organizations and members at every court within every jurisdiction. Their membership having the ability to undermine the administration of justice before or after a judge's decision, and to prevent and deny judicial involvement altogether while all lawyers and legal professionals are mandated to participate in the non-disclosure and confidentiality under Rule 1.6... or the LOCAL RULES... or the McDade-Murtha Amendment.<br/><br/>Every legal professional, lawyer, government lawyer and inspector mandated by ONE LAW to conceal the sedition - the usurpation of the authority of the judicial branch in every state and federally - while it denied the rule of law and ignored rights secured by the US Constitution and delivered INJUSTICE.<br/><br/>I imagine it startled some people when<br/>On August 8, 2013, pro se litigants with standing and a cause for relief which could be addressed by the state attorneys general walked into District Court in Philadelphia to challenge an unconstitutional law which by mandating non-disclosure and confidentiality by legal professionals caused a collateral denial of their rights secured by the US Constitution and without representation by legal counsel obligated by confidentialitysought to restore the integrity of the judiciary, and the reputation of lawyers and<br/>to return to their litigation in the state courts with their rights available and no longer denied, ignored, prevented and concealed.<br/><br/><br/><center>They lawyers had written it so that the lawyers could never fix it.</center><br/><br/>Governor Tom Corbett was prevented from assembling the Legislature to address this matter as he was obligated as a lawyer to non-disclosure.<br/><br/>Governor Wolf is not similarly prevented.<br/><br/><br/>To the Pennsylvania Senate:<br/>I wanted you to do your job, follow your oath, take action. <br/><br/>Did the lawyers scare you off? <br/>This law does permit fraud in the furtherance... and actually permits, endorses and conceals everything and anything except KILLING A PERSON. <br/><br/>PLEASE RECOGNIZE THE ENORMITY OF THIS ISSUE... and be aware of the liability of the informed where their obligations are neglected and causing unconstitutional injustice nationwide.<br/><br/><h2>ONLY THE LEGISLATURE CAN SUSPEND THIS LAW.</h2> <br/>(The lawyers in the legislature will not participate by law.)<br/><br/>JUSTICE is waiting on your prompt attention to this matter.<br/><br/><br/><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/godisjust.jpg" alt="godisjust" width="550" height="151" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9306" />Terancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8495349982447643424.post-34778664790143753822015-02-14T21:46:00.000-05:002015-02-19T16:11:24.629-05:00Death Row Moratorium... with Rule 1.6 Awareness<em>How do you explain to a governor that the prisoner on death row faces no real risk of execution, because an injustice may only be concealed where there is no risk of death. If we learn of intent to execute, we may no longer conceal the injustice and any fraudulent efforts which have concealed it. </em><br/><center><strong>Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information.</strong></center><br/><br/><center>If you want to conceal something evil, put it inside something boring.</center><br/><br/>The previous <a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/2015/02/pennsylvania-district-attorneys-no-mirrors-in-that-place/" title="Pennsylvania District Attorneys – No mirrors in that place?">post about the Pennsylvania District Attorneys</a> started out 'light' - some humor at the grand drama. Lady with a crazy face asking if they had no self recognition or perception... and it finished with a breakdown of the District Attorneys who have failed me personally. It was through their inaction that I realized the loss of any protections under the law. Every crime reported to the township police, the county detectives, or the DA's office was ignored outright OR the response was that their boss instructed them to do nothing. <br/><br/>There was no doubt about the crimes. BUT, they would not say any reason for NOT investigating/prosecuting. Car theft, identity theft, custody violations, burglary - involving minor children, computer intrusions, home intrusions, private investigators, fraud, false allegations to police, ... and more. ALL committed against me and IGNORED at the direction of the District Attorney.<br/><br/>The reports of corruption and constitutional violations of several judges when reported to township police went nowhere. The evidence of the court documents PROVING their crimes were ignored because that person is a judge and if a cop takes the complaint, the judge will retaliate. Yes, I understand that, they are retaliating against me for surviving their retaliation. <br/><br/><center>Improperly enacted and unconstitutional - ONE LAW <br/>has undermined the judiciary and usurped their authority<br/>while mandating confidentiality and excusing fraud to prevent exposure. <br/>Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information.</center><br/><br/><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/ferman.jpg" alt="ferman" width="171" height="260" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-9913" />I have no admiration for Risa Ferman. I find her involvement with childrens aid organizations a potential for conflict of interest involving human trafficking and placing children in jeopardy. As a judge, she would have more ability to conceal lawlessness and corruption. Her record indicates failure to enforce the law while concealing judicial corruption. Why would she be any different with MORE power and less oversight? Her failures since 2008, demonstrates no understanding of good and bad, right and wrong and selective disregard for constitutional rights and the rule of law.<br/><br/>The District Attorneys usurped the authority of the Sheriff - the Chief Law Enforcement Officer in the County - and began referring to themselves as Chief Law Enforcement Professional in the County. The authority of the Sheriff was diminished out of necessity. The Sheriff was the only non-lawyer in law enforcement with authority to investigate and arrest - their jurisdiction pre-dates the constitutions and is only affected when specifically indicated within a law that the sheriff has restrictions or limitations regarding enforcement. Otherwise, The Chief Law Enforcement Officer has full authority while relegated to transporting prisoners and guarding the hostages who occupy the bench. They need protection because they have no independence, no jurisdiction, no power, BUT still present the illusions while denying justice without explanation.<br/><br/>It was easy and discreet to convince the Sheriffs of diminished authority than to re-write every law, or amend the constitution. November 25, 1997, the Attorney General informed the sheriffs. There were cases brought to courts where case law was misrepresented to substantiate the ruling - THAT then became the cited case. The Judiciary decides what the constitution does and does not mean - they are permitted to error. This time because it was necessary to remove the last remaining non-lawyer with any authority from law enforcement. Where the judiciary could not remove the corrupting law without violating it, they concealed it.<br/> <br/><h2>Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information</h2><br/>Rule 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION controls and maintains the non-disclosure and silence of lawyers and legal professionals. It does so without regard for the effect on the constitutional rights of litigants without obligation to abide by the law while its collateral effect prevents disclosure, mandates confidentiality and excuses fraud to conceal fraud to conceal fraud... all confidential to them, while known to the litigant, they are obligated to IGNORE..<br/><br/>Once a victim experiences judicial corruption and injustice, Rule 1.6 prevents the rule of law and constitutional rights. FOREVER. <br/><br/>Rule 1.6 victims faces only 3 possible outcomes... 1) Homeless/Destitute 2) Incarcerated and 3) Suicide. There can be no life when a person can be attacked at any time and have no recourse, no protection, no escape. It's unimaginable and hard to explain, because that is not supposed to even be possible. Rule 1.6 is about keeping things quiet.<br/><br/><h2>WHY THE HUBBUB, BUB?</h2><br/>The moratorium on executions and the review of Death Row Cases requested by the Governor was explained - multiple hearings mis-used courts and stalling processes occurring post sentencing. The exoneration of prisoners nationwide has been a shock. <br/><br/>PROSECUTORIAL IMMUNITY. The law allows prosecutors to do anything to get a conviction - within or outside the law, the prosecutor can't be prosecuted for such crimes, deliberate or intentional or malicious or corrupt. Those issues are reported to the Disciplinary Board and IGNORED. <br/><br/>Where Prosecutors are protected from prosecution, why would they respond to Gov Wolf's announcement as they have done. <br/><ul>- Aggressive. <br/>- Misinformation. <br/>- Disinformation. <br/>- Indicating a Cause For Public alarm and fear. <br/>- Listing the major reported crimes - sentenced and not yet heard. <br/>- Calling out the police widows - their grief is not a tool - it is disrespectful to upset them with misinformation. <br/>- The tweets suggesting the governor lacks authority, or is acting like a king,</ul><br/>the extremes of their grandstanding are absurd. They know what is at stake. <br/><br/><h2>The 'worst kept secret in Pennsylvania', where the lawyers can't explain the law which mandated their confidentiality and non-disclosure while mandated to non-disclosure and confidentiality by the law. <br/><br/>The Silence of Rule 1.6 is not something to ignore while lawyers are allowed to lie to get you to ignore it.<br/></h2><br/><br/>The public knows who is on death row. Once they are there, no one cares. No one gives a damn about anyone in prison. If a person in prison has anyone who does care, that person is required to explain to everyone everywhere. They know most don't listen or give a damn how they waste their time trying to exonerate any prisoner. Against those incredible odds, it has happened. More frequently than is acceptable. How does a society apologize to a man improperly jailed for decades, subjected to the indignities of prison life, the disrespect by everyone??? Society is grateful those select winners have not been angry and retaliated. In itself, that's remarkable.<br/><br/><h2>The Governor is seeking a conversation which the District Attorneys cannot have and are not permitted to explain.<br/><br/>The Attorney General has a court order preventing investigations, prosecutions and involvement and is not permitted to explain.</h2><br/><br/>The Governor has made no accusation or expectation for the review. He explained his reasons. <br/><br/>His attorney general is afflicted by court orders - secret orders from unidentified courts which expose her to personal liability and REQUIRE her neglect of the duties of her office but deny any explanation. <br/><br/>The Attorney General cannot share the orders, ... are they secret, or imaginary? Pennsylvania Courts do not operate like that. The courts are transparent and open, which reinforces their judicial independence to reach just and lawful decisions.<br/><br/>The Governor asked about the people in prison who no one cares about.<br/>The Attorney General is moot with an overactive imagination, or secret orders indicating she is fearful of speaking.<br/>The District Attorneys are paranoid and highly confrontational and calling names.<br/><br/>THE DA's have clearly over reacted... WHY? <br/><center><h2>"What's not being said" - IS the issue.</h2></center><br/><br/>I'm sane (with papers) permit me to explain because it all started when I found this one bad law. Rule 1.6 I call it <em>the needle in the haystack of injustice</em>. I'm allowed to talk and have done so often to excess. Here goes...<br/><br/><h2>THE AFFECT OF ONE LAW</h2> <br/>Rule 1.6 Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure results in the victims of injustice losing all protection of the law and their rights secured and protected by the US Constitution are ignored. IGNORED by every in law enforcement, lawyers and the courts. <br/><br/>This casual open neglect by judges and prosecutors is reported everywhere by people who don't understand why the judges and lawyers are getting away with it. <br/><br/>Lawyers don't like to take some cases, because they have no chance of winning where they are required to maintain CONFIDENTIALITY and cannot explain the injustice. If they get hit with litigation from a client, the judge realizes their misconduct was due to Rule 1.6 confidentiality and lets the lawyers slide. The realization likely occurred in an ex parte conversation. <br/><br/>The injustice grows... from the first instance. Rights were lost at that point. Never regained. Everything ignored to conceal the error/crime/injustice. The lawyers are getting paid anyway until the person runs out of money. Self representing while fraud is permitted to conceal fraud puts a litigant in a court where the only person needing justice is the person denied it to conceal prior injustice without explanation. <br/><br/>It's not buddy lawyer and buddy judge. Rule 1.6 mandated non-disclosure and confidentiality even conceals fraud to conceal fraud. It is not personal. It is not what you said, or what you did not say. You cannot affect the continued injustice you receive. Every lie ever told may be offered as explanation while they are not permitted to disclose the truth. <br/><br/><ul>Rule 1.6 requires non-disclosure of acts in the furtherance of fraud to conceal fraud. The fraudulent efforts to cover up the injustice are required to be kept confidential. The fraud cannot be prosecuted because it, and effort to conceal it, must remain confidential.</ul><br/><br/><ul>Rule 1.6 requires non-disclosure of information which would rectify the fraud and efforts to conceal are permitted endorsed excused and held confidential.</ul><br/><br/>To the victim of injustice, there is no escape from further injustice. Escape can be imagined. But the reality can occur at any moment where the prior injustice can be leveraged for further injustice WHILE REQUIRED TO BE CONCEALED. It's bad because there was no way out then. You cannot control it. They cannot control it. If someone uses it, you will lose every time. They cannot say why. (Most don't know why it works, they just know it works.) It may undermine the remainder of your life. #INJUSTICE #CORRUPTION<br/><br/>Most people are safe. Injustice is not supposed to occur, the judge is responsible to guard against it. Often, lawyers negotiate the situation into something else entirely, an agreement. The victim of injustice is ALWAYS in jeopardy. You have no protection of the law. People may commit crimes against you and suffer no consequences. Not paranoia, this is reality. <br/><br/>The protection of the law and civil/human/constitutional rights are things which you only seek when you need them. EVERYONE KNOWS THE BASICS. BUT, most do not know that there's a LAW which makes it OK to ignore, and REQUIRES that the law and your rights be ignored. IF you get any explanation, it can be horseshit (fraud in the furtherance). If it didn't make sense. The law excuses every non-sensical illogical misinformation when concealing injustice. The person making it up is under no obligation to tell you truth when the law says they can't reveal the injustice.<br/><br/><br/><h2>ONLY ONE CONDITION VOIDS CONFIDENTIALITY</h2><br/><strong>The victim of injustice may not be killed.</strong> <br/><br/>The victim of injustice may not be killed. Disclosure is MANDATED in that instance. ALL PRIOR CONFIDENTIALITY AND NON-DISCLOSURE IS NOT APPLICABLE.<br/><br/>But as long as the victim of injustice is not to be murdered or killed, Rule 1.6 confidentiality is aggressively enforced.<br/><br/>Suicides do not void confidentiality. <br/>- You may be tormented to that decision by non-disclosed fraud and injustice. It's the choice of the person to commit suicide. It is not murder. Suicide does not end Rule 1.6 Confidentiality and non disclosure... it only stops further injustice. <br/>.<br/>If the victim is dead already, there's no disclosure permitted. Confidentiality starts to conceal at that initial injustice. #Ferguson<br/>- So when a lawyer misguides a grand jury about an innocent victim being shot, the lies, misinformation and disinformation are permitted. It is called fraud in the furtherance to conceal prior injustice/fraud/corruption.<br/><br/><h2>THE PENNSYLVANIA DA's REACTION</h2><br/>The injustice described above is concealed according to the law. That law applies to lawyers and legal professionals ONLY. They must follow the law, unless the KNOW that it is unconstitutional to them. <br/><br/>Unconstitutional to you does not provide standing for a lawyer to challenge the constitutionality. The lawyer can't litigate unconstitutional to you while the law is the law; because, the law requires non-disclosure and confidentiality of lawyers.<br/><br/>You could do it yourself, BUT the court staff follow the law and they can intercept and interfere. The judge may not ever see it, or <br/>you. <br/><br/>YOU DID NOTHING TO CAUSE THIS PROBLEM. Most likely, when the trigger occurred, you were not informed at all. Everything just stopped being lawful.<br/><br/>Everyone must follow the law.<br/><br/>Confidentiality prevents District Attorneys from any effort to remove the law.<br/>District Attorneys follow the law. The DA's did not enact the law, and they cannot change the law. <br/><br/><h2>How do you explain to a governor that the prisoner is on death row and faces no real intention to execute the death sentence.</h2> <br/>An Injustice is keeping the prisoner on death row alive. BUT, if we learn of intent to execute, we may no longer conceal an injustice and any fraudulent efforts which conceal it. <br/><br/>So maybe they don't belong on death row? Under Rule 1`.6 we can't say unless he's going to be killed.<br/>What was the Injustice? We can;t say. Rule 1.6 mandates non-disclosure and confidentiality.<br/><br/>By not executing a prisoner on death row and where there is no real intent to kill the prisoner, Rule 1.6 Confidentiality and non-disclosure conceals fraud and injustice. <br/><br/>Keeping a victim of injustice alive on death row permits RULE 1.6 to conceal the 'fraud' that there is no real intent to execute.<br/><br/>THE PEOPLE ON DEATH ROW WHO MAY NOT FACE THE REAL RISK OF EXECUTION COULD BE VICTIMS OF CONCEALED RULE 1.6 INJUSTICE AND FRAUD TO COVER IT UP. <br/><br/>While there is no intent to kill, non-disclosure and confidentiality are mandated.<br/><br/>The Secrets are safe, unless the victim is going to be killed.<br/><br/><br/><h2>A PRISONER ON DEATH ROW</h2><br/><br/>Where a prisoner on death row has been there for a prolonged time and no execution has been scheduled, the liklihood of there being an undisclosed injustice or corruption involved in the case is very strong.<br/><br/>EVERYONE MUST FOLLOW THE LAW... and lawyers and legal professionals are following Rule 1.6. <br/><br/>Lawyers cannot have anything to do with the review of the case? We can, but we would have to conceal the corruption and injustice. It would be kind of pointless I suppose.<br/><br/><h2>NOW EXPAND THE LAW DOWN TO ALL PRISONERS</h2><br/><br/>Rule 1.6 may concealing the injustice of a person who lost protection of the law, and their rights, and is incarcerated.<br/><br/><h2>NOW EXPAND TO ALL PEOPLE</h2><br/><br/>Rule 1.6 may concealing the injustice of a person who lost protection of the law, and their rights. Likely destitute/homeless as any crimes could take everything they owned and be ignored.<br/><br/>The cruelty of Rule 1.6 is that it prevents justice by mandating silence to keep the victim under attack, and prevents their death which would relieve them of further misery.<br/><br/><center><hr width=75%></center><br/><h2> IT HAPPENED. IT IS HAPPENING EVERYWHERE.RE</h2><br/>Where the lawyers silently conceal the courts injustice and corruption, there is no protection of the law and constitutional rights are ignored.<br/><br/>KIDS FOR CASH... thousands of families, children jailed, no law no rights.<br/><br/>COMMISSION REPORT... lawyers mandated to not reveal Rule 1.6 Confidentiality failed to see the silence was mandated by law.<br/><br/>Foreclosures based on fraudulent documents... lawyers silently observed the courts injustice. Once the fraud was committed in the court, it could not be addressed.<br/><br/>The lawyer could conceal their client, non-existent or who could be themselves, forging fraudulent documents, all frauds in the furtherance of fraud prevented the rule of law and constitutional rights. Preventing prosecution where it would expose the injustice and corruption.<br/><br/>Could this be why no one was prosecuted during the Foreclosure Crisis, while robo-signed fraudulent documents were known to have been used, yet the courts allowed the foreclosures. Where lack of standing was ignored to conceal injustice.<br/><br/>Rule 1.6 INJUSTICE is the Constitutional Crisis Americans are witnessing. <br/><br/><center>If you want to hide something evil, do it inside something boring.</center><br/><br/><br/><h2>THEY CAN'T DO THAT! YOU KNOW THEY DID.</h2><br/>RULE 1.6 IS THE LAW. It is an aggressively enforced mandate of Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure.<br/><br/>Rule 1.6 trumps every law - no protection under the law.<br/><br/>Rule 1.6 trumps every right and privilege secured and protected by the US Constitution.<br/><br/>Rule 1.6 is Confidentiality concealing injustice from which there can be no relief.<br/>- Lawyers cannot help you while mandated to participate against you.<br/><br/>Purporting to be necessary, and ethical, it is often suggested to be only "attorney-client privilege", but is far broader and cross referenced throughout the 'Rules'. One law enacted in each state which must be followed by federal attorneys and investigators and is part of the local rules in federal courts. <br/><br/><h2>The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 - GOT 1.6'd</h2><br/>The District Court was unprepared for the pro se litigant with evidence proving Rule 1.6 UNCONSTITUTIONAL<br/>- Dismissed. Unsigned, Unsubstantiated. Fraud in the furtherance by lawyer in the clerks office.<br/><br/>The Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed and did not permit Reconsideration.<br/>- Affirmed. Reconsideration Denied. Unsigned. Efforts to witness the delivery of the case to the judges resulted in the US Marshalls being called. The Marshalls were already aware of the 'problem' - like the sheriffs have been convinced of diminished responsibilities<br/><br/>Rule 1.6 Challenge got Rule 1.6'd. <br/><br/>The Constitutional Challenge was pre-emptory, and intended to prevent the corruption and loss of integrity within the higher PA courts.<br/><br/>Not until the lower court cases were before the Superior Court of PA did Rule 1.6 play before out before our eyes in Superior Court.<br/>The supporting evidence of unconstitutionality occurred in the lower courts, and the Attorney General notified that it would be involved in the Appeal. <br/><br/><h2>UNCONSTITUTIONAL DEMONSTRATION IN SUPERIOR COURT</h2><br/>The Central Legal Staff demonstrated a judiciary held hostage. The activities of the court staff - violations of Appellate Rules, PA law and interfering with the administration of the courts, obstruction of justice, et al. The actions were on the record. While every document must be submitted through the staff, the dismissals and responding documents were clearly not the product of the judiciary .Unsigned and violating the judicial canons, neglecting applicable law. When challenged for evidence of judicial involvement, failure to comply and failure to explain would indicate Rule 1.6 non-disclosure. <br/><br/>Using Rule 1.6 to conceal their violation of my constitutional rights, PROVED THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL AFFECT OF THE LAW. Rule 1.6 had the collateral affect of denying a litigant of constitutionally protected rights and privileges and denied the protection of the law.<br/><br/><h2>WHY DIDN'T THE JUDGES COVER FOR THEIR STAFF?</h2><br/>Where the lower court acted in the clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction, in violation of Pennsylvania law, and issued a defective and void order, obstructed a primary appeal, failed to provide court records, et al. there would not be any availability of absolute judicial immunity. This judge neglected every aspect , and prevented any resolution. She retaliated with cruelty, and irreparable damage. She's exposed 20 judges ion the lower court to the loss of immunity. Yes, there were 20 judges in the matter. No, not rich. Destitute now. Just didn't suicide, like he was supposed to.<br/> <br/>If the Superior Court Judiciary concealed up for the actions of the staff, they faced liability due to the lack of absolute judicial immunity caused in the lower court. <br/><br/>The level of fraud in the furtherance in Healy v Healy may have been very extreme. So much so that it caused him to discover Rule 1,6 was at the center of everything. 8-9 years now, and going...<br/><br/><h2>Criminal Complaints</h2><br/>Requests for signed documents were ignored, the court informed of the offenses/complaint, and complaints sent to the Us Attorney and the District Attorney of Philadelphia and Bucks County, and the Attorney General of PA, and others.<br/><br/>Appellate procedure/law required the Pennsylvania Attorney general be notified of the challenge to the constitutionality of the law being an element of the appeal. Healy v Healy(Carluccio), Healy v Healy(Page) and Healy v Miller(Weilheimer) were some of the appeals.<br/><br/>Two unidentified court orders from unidentified courts silence the AG, and prevent her investigation and responsibilities of her office. They are under appeal. Little is known about the documents. There is also a grand jury issue which is silencing the attorney general - from Montgomery County - same as Healy v Healy and Healy v Miller.<br/><br/>There are documents entered into the dockets and removed which have not been provided to the parties. The Court responded with an Order, but did not copy the Appellant. Requests for production of the documents are DENIED. No Signatures.<br/><br/>The Attorney General now well informed of the unconstitutional effect, Rule 1.6 is no law, and provides no mandate for confidentiality and non-disclosure as a lawyer. HOWEVER, two secret court orders from two unidentified courts mandate her silence. They must be followed until appealed and removed.<br/><br/>There is no allowance for the courts to issue secret orders on cases which are not heard obligating person who are not a party to the action. <br/><br/>The law is the law until it is not the law. <br/><br/>Until declared unconstitutional or suspended by the legislature, Rule 1.6 permits fraud to conceal fraud. Rule 1.6 conceals fraud in the furtherance or to prevent rectifying the fraud, so secret court orders must be followed.<br/><br/>Without necessity to adhere to an unconstitutional law, the courts have issued two secret court orders which must be obeyed until they are stricken on appealed. The court orders mandate the participation of Kathleen kane in the violation of constitutional protected rights from which there can be mo immunity or protected from demands for releif. A conspiracy to deny and prevent constitutional rights is created and evidenced by the documents. The orders require Kathleen Kane to violate her oath of office and the responsibilities and duties of the Office of the Attorney General. The Orders prevents her from exposing the documents or discussion.<br/><br/>While ther has been no official confirmation of the documents relating to my cases or appeals, the possibility of coincidence is null.<br/><br/>Powerful secret orders... summed up by Kathleen Kane as follows:<br/><ul><br/>“I am shocked at the level of public corruption.”<br/><br/>“I am shocked at how deep it goes.<br/>I am shocked at how powerful it is.<br/>I have never seen anything like this. It’s breathtaking.<br/>It has been described by the people familiar with what is happening as shameful.”<br/><br/>“But, if this can be done to me as Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer of the 5th largest state in the country, I am sickened to think what can and may be done to regular, good people who don’t have the resources that I have to challenge it.”<br/></ul><br/><br/><h2>The DA's know what the Governor may find.</h2><br/>The DA's know what the Governor may find. They will not be permitted to explain. Innocent persons on death row with no escape. The inability to explain, silenced by LAW, will be unacceptable, and embarrassing and revealing. Rule 1.6 will be further exposed to the pubic, but not by lawyers.<br/><br/>Those who attack the silenced Attorney General will be seen under a different perspective.<br/><br/>So far, THE DA's have failed to investigate and prosecute the Superior Court Staff. IGNORED pursuant to Rule 1.6. <br/><br/>They are participating in a conspiracy to deny constitutional rights, based on a law which when proven unconstitutional involves them in the federal crime. They are refusing to investigate and prosecute the crimes and the unconstitutional acts. Their professional responsibilities creates a personal liability.<br/><br/>They continue to participate in a conspiracy to deny constitutional rights, a federal offense, because of their participation in preventing constitutional rights.<br/><br/>THERE IS NO EXCUSE for denying a person of the constitutional rights, or participating in a conspircy to deny rights.<br/><br/>Yes, the law gets very spun around under Rule 1.6<br/><br/><H2>WHO WROTE THIS UNCONSTITUTIONAL ABOMINATION?</h2><br/>There is no legislative immunity available for the authors who were not member of the legislature, or those supreme courts who improperly enacted and unconstitutional law.<br/><br/>Rule 1.6 was enacted nationwide from 1984 to 2009, promoted by the American Bar Association as a code of ethics while they knew it lacked ethics - they removed the 'fraud provisions' - their membership and affiliates exist in every jurisdiction of state and federal courts. <br/><br/>While enacted by the state supreme courts, they could not repeal according to their own law. <br/><br/>The judiciary have been held hostage ever since. Concealed by their participation which sacrifices their integrity, the injustice caused by the inability to escape a law which was their undoing. Lawyers preventing the judges from escape when the unconstitutional law was challenged.<br/><br/>The ABA is a trade organization with its purpose to promote the profession. They earned their membership piles of money, at the cost of the professional reputation. Injustice is a goldmine. Justice - not so much.<br/><br/>Holding the judiciary hostage after they violated the public trust and leveraging continued injustice for Americans in violation of the US Constitution where it benefited their members financially. The sedition of the American Bar Association will go down as the biggest scandal in US history... as soon as we can discuss it. The lawyers are not talking, and not allowing the courts to address the issue.<br/><br/>Justice is Coming.<br/><br/><table><tr><td>Did anyone else notice that the Attorney General had no comment on the moratorium? The Chief Law Enforcement Officer? The lawyer who represents the Governor and the Commonwealth? <br/><br/>Do you suppose those secret court orders extended somehow to prevent effort which will expose Rule 1.6 in any way? There is no explanations for her failure to address the issue in Superior Court FOR THE THREE APPEALS and others.<br/><br/>Documents submitted on her behalf in the Constitutional Challenge create a liability for her for conspiring to prevent the constitutional rights of EVERY AMERICAN. The lawyers removed 55 attorneys general from the challenge docket AND the appeal.<br/><br/>One heck of a PERSONAL liability builds while the court orders are appealed. So that's why she got those high falootin lawyers... thje whole country has her in their sights, and the courts are creating her liability, preventing her actions and silencing her.<br/><br/>It's a shame the courts and lawyers cannot say anything of this Rule 1.6<br/> unless they recognize it is unconstitutional. Secret court may need to print alot of secret orders. Secretly of course.<br/><br/>Darryl Metcalfe - Kanes got bigger concerns than bigots trying to impeach her. Seems you are continuing to prevent and obstruct constitutionally protected rights, and lamenting a proven unconstitutional law. <br/></td></tr></table><br/>Standing can be tricky... It is personal. It requires direct effect. I had it and it was dismissed anyway, Rule 1.6'd.<br/><br/>A Report on Death Row could reveal cases... possibly standing for the Gov?<br/><br/><h2>Or maybe just the evidence the Legislature needs to suspend the law. <br/>Constitutionally The Legislature has the only authority to suspend the law.<br/>PLEASE STOP ASKING the judiciary committees - they are lawyers mandated to commit fraud in the furtherance to conceal it.</h2><br/><br/><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/greenleaf.jpg" alt="greenleaf" width="110" height="148" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-8834" />That's why Stewart Greenleaf refuses to talk to me, and his office was informed of the terror of my divorce for years. He knew the terror... so it had to be a law that made him ignore a constituent begging for help. Me finding Rule 1.6 after 7 years of litigation harassment and terror show Greenleaf is not a total ass, he just a corrupt evil politician that helped hide this for 30 years.<br/><br/><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/stephens.jpg" alt="stephens" width="110" height="148" class="alignright size-full wp-image-8821" />Todd Stephens believes people don't have constitutional rights unless the judge says so. He made me laugh. How many years did he work with District Attorney Bruce Castor to become that misinformed? Lawyer Stephens wins <em>Funniest Fraud in the Furtherance</em>. Where it made him out to be completely and totally stupid, he was just being a disrespectful asshole because the law required it. <br/><br/><center><h2>Are you stupid, or are you a lawyer <br/><em>(committing fraud on the furtherance) </em><br/>who thinks that I am?</h2></center><br/><br/>Still waiting for that meeting with the other local officials... <br/>How am I ever going to litigate against all of those people who conspired to deny my constitutional rights? even when not excused by an unconstitutional law? I'm ashamed for them... on the wrong side of an egregious rape of the public trust and unwilling to save the judiciary from their captors and restore their integrity.<br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/2014/09/invitation-2nd-request/" target="_blank">I wasn't trying to gain defendants, I wanted you to do your job, follow your oath. Why did you get into politics if you didn't believe in the US Constitution? Did the lawyers scare you off? Do you realize HOW HUGE this issue is?<br/></a><center><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Watson.jpg" alt="Watson" width="100" /><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Quinn.jpg" alt="Quinn" width="100" /><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/stephens.jpg" alt="stephens" width="100" /><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/davis.jpg" alt="davis" width="100" /><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/petri.jpg" alt="petri" width="100" /><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/galloway.jpg" alt="galloway" width="100" /><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/murt.jpg" alt="murt" width="100" /><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/santarsiero.jpg" alt="santarsiero" width="100" /><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/farry.jpg" alt="farry" width="100" /><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/clymer.jpg" alt="clymer" width="100" /><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/digirolamo.jpg" alt="digirolamo" width="100" /><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/oneill.jpg" alt="oneill" width="100" /><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/harper.jpg" alt="harper" width="100" /><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/mensch.jpg" alt="mensch" width="100" /><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/tomlinson.jpg" alt="tomlinson" width="100" /><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/mcilhinney.jpg" alt="mcilhinney" width="100" /><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/greenleaf.jpg" alt="greenleaf" width="100" /><br/><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/fitzpatrick.jpg" alt="fitzpatrick" width="120" /><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/casey1.jpg" alt="casey" width="100" /><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/toomey-236x300.jpg" alt="toomey" width="100" /></center><br/><br/><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/intimidation5-300x200.jpg" alt="intimidation5" width="200" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-11000" />Rep. Katherine M. Watson<br/>Rep. Marguerite Quinn<br/>Rep. Todd Stephens<br/>Rep. Tina Davis<br/>Rep. Scott Petri<br/>Rep. John T. Galloway <br/>Rep. Thomas Murt<br/><br/><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/intimidation_tool_01_sm.jpg" alt="intimidation_tool_01_sm" width="200" class="alignright size-full wp-image-10998" />Rep. Steven J. Santarsiero<br/>Rep. Frank Farry<br/>Rep. Paul Clymer<br/>Rep. Gene DiGirolamo<br/>Rep. Bernie O’Neill<br/>Rep. Kate Harper<br/><br/><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/images-3-300x132.jpg" alt="images (3)" width="200" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-10996" />Sen. Bob Mensch<br/>Sen. Robert Tomlinson<br/>Sen. Charles McIlhinney<br/>Sen. Stewart Greenleaf<br/><br/><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Intimidation.gif" alt="Intimidation" width="200" class="alignright size-full wp-image-10999" />Congressman Mike Fitzpatrick<br/>Senator Bob Casey<br/>Senator Pat ToomeyTerancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8495349982447643424.post-19756805880868445482015-02-14T11:34:00.000-05:002015-02-19T16:11:24.656-05:00Kathleen won't say, but...<img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/wolfkane2.png" alt="wolfkane2" width="600" height="400" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-11004" /><br/><br/><center><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/2015/02/death-row-moratorium-with-rule-1-6-awareness/" title="Death Row Moratorium… with Rule 1.6 Awareness" target="_blank">Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information.</a><br/>If you want to conceal something evil, put it inside something boring.</center>Terancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8495349982447643424.post-35760106792502449862015-02-13T12:28:00.000-05:002015-02-19T16:11:24.604-05:00Pennsylvania District Attorneys - No mirrors in that place?The <a href="http://www.pdaa.org/press-releases/" target="_blank">PA District Attorneys</a> attack the Governor who knows their corruption hidden by Rule 1.6<br/><br/>For whatever reason, they are taking this scrutiny VERY personally. They may revert to the womb when the Rule 1.6 story exposes their violation of the Public Trust for ... 30 years. Professionals, pretend to be Professionals. Their reaction is not surprising - when a bully gets exposed - they often break. <em> Their victims laugh at their behavior. ...and tweet.</em><br/><br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/cray.png"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/cray.png" alt="cray" width="579" height="561" class="alignright size-full wp-image-10937" /></a><br/><br/>@DADaveFreed tweeted: <ul>Tom Wolf was elected Governor, not King. He is misusing the concept of a death penalty reprieve. @PennsylvaniaDAs will fight this action</ul><br/><br/>Philadelphia DAO @Philly_DAsOfc tweeted:<ul>..the ppl most grateful for this "moratorium" on capital punishment are the guiltiest, cruelest, most vicious killers on death row.</ul><br/><br/><br/>Terance Healy @TeranceH tweeted:<ul>@Philly_DAsOfc @PennsylvaniaDAs INJUSTICE- 30 years Rule 1.6 conceals the violation of the Public Trust & undermines CONSTITUTION #TrustLost</ul><br/><br/><br/>Atop that high horse do they think Rule 1.6 is a cloaking device?<br/><br/>Their press release includes mentions of people already convicted and those not yet tried. They suggest they are saving society while a governor who places a moratorium on the death penalty places people at risk.<br/><br/>The Governor wants to review the list, not remove the Death Penalty. That seems the respectable thing to do...<br/><br/>The District Attorney reaction - not so respectable, and somewhat heavy on the paranoia - but they know the Governor is aware of Rule 1.6 Corruption and Injustice. <br/><br/>THEY MUST KNOW because they have used it to prevent the Attorney General from speaking, or performing investigations and other responsibilities of the Office of the Attorney General. <br/><br/>Seems they were in on the secret - two secret court orders which silenced the AG about an unconstitutional law. They added a grand jury threat and a threat to impeach. There's been no explanation of those secrets. WHY IS NO ONE ASKING ABOUT THE IMPROPRIETY??? <br/><br/>When violating a person's constitutional rights, the CLE training has been effective within the Pennsylvania District Attorneys. The Psychology of Confidentiality?? ANSWER: IGNORE THE PERSON and ignore the rule of law.<br/><br/>The District Attorneys have concealed Rule 1.6 corruption and injustice<br/>... which violated the Constitutional rights of Pennsylvanians for 30 years.<br/>... have attacked and threatened PA Attorney General Kathleen Kane while she is ordered MUTE<br/>... they believe the only beneficiaries are people on death row.<br/><br/>People do not give a damn about people in prison. And we in PA have seen some prison abuses... which THEY ALL IGNORED.<br/><br/>THERE IS A HEIGHTENED AWARENESS OF INJUSTICE IN THE US. The District Attorneys are likely IGNORING.<br/><br/>They didn't see the signs... EVERY _______ MATTERS, <a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/2015/02/justice-is-coming-3/" title="Justice Is Coming… Don’t Count Me Out Just Yet." target="_blank"> They were everywhere. The People have noticed the INJUSTICE.</a> <em>Mebbe Y'all need a mirror AND a television.</em><br/><br/>In recent years, there have been many exonerated from Death row within the US. A review is not out of the question... as a matter of fact, for a Governor who knows the track record on civil rights and constitutional violations of those who purport to 'preserve protect and defend the Constitution" might be inclined for a more aggressive review. Gov Wolf has been in office only a few weeks. He's not ignoring... Enjoy the attention.<br/><br/><h2>District Attorney Problems</h2><br/>Mine started with Bruce Castor ignoring me.<br/>Risa Vetri Ferman ignored the crimes along with the corruption<br/>David Heckler was no help, even once I moved to Bucks county. (Well, evicted, but more on that soon.)<br/>Seth Williams has ignored the crimes and constitutional violations of the court staff.<br/>So has David Heckler and Zane Memeger.<br/>Kathleen Kane was ordered to ignore it... TWICE (LOL, Civil Rights? LOL. WTF.)<br/><br/>The investigation into my life started under Castor and continued under Ferman with advice from Heckler ignored by 3 Attorneys General, and 2 Governors - even where one had been an AG and all the surveillance on the books approved by Superior Court of Philadelphia and off the books handled by private investigators.<br/><br/>Whats a lot of intrusive surveillance shared with judges and your wife and her lawyers and your kids when you are at the lowest pointy in your life, and begging for them to investigate THEIR INVESTIGATION.<br/><br/>With no suicide, and no murders, and no crime prosecuted, what a waste of county resources, and eight years of undermining every aspect of a life. Well, that judge fuk'd you over and everyone had to hide the order and those crimes and the warrants and the crimes etc... Well, we had no excuse - it wasn't personal that your life was annihilated...<br/><br/>Anyway, it all started under Bruce Castor. It's his fault we terrorized you. <br/><br/>THEN, YOU FOUND OUT HOW WE LEGALIZED CORRUPTION AND CRIME AND INJUSTICE. To be honest WE DIDN'T EVEN GET IT. But, it worked like a charm, once ignored, victimized, without rights and no laws to protect you or anything you owned, we just IGNORED EVERYTHING. How did you figure out it was a law?<br/><br/>NEW RULE: DO NOT CHANNEL DA's... it conflicts with humanity and defies logic.<br/><br/><h2>CASTOR PUTS THE DRUNK UNCLE ACT TO SHAME</h2><br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/1901860_646326345414783_384204306_n.jpg"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/1901860_646326345414783_384204306_n.jpg" alt="1901860_646326345414783_384204306_n" width="155" height="155" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-10261" /></a>Y'all did see what Bruce Castor had to say... Right? <a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/2015/01/commissioner-bruce-castor-schooled-in-how-to-really-hurt-you-and-to-screw-others/" title="Commissioner Bruce Castor “schooled in how to really hurt you” and “to [screw] others”" target="_blank">The New Years Eve Manifesto?</a><br/><br/> “you don’t go to war with a person who spends his/her professional life figuring how to [screw] others…” <br/><br/>The crazy bastard wants to be elected DA again. He attacked Bill Cosby in the media AFTER FAILING TO PROSECUTE HIM, or indict him. <br/><br/>When we know a Montgomery County Grand Jury could indict a ham sandwich if instructed by the DA. <br/><br/>If the allegations are true, Bruce seems to believe them. Bruce Castor left a man on the street to drug & rape 35 women??? Minimum - He oughta get Cosby's endorsement in the new campaign...<br/><br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/CosbyCastor.png"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/CosbyCastor.png" alt="CosbyCastor" width="550" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-10948" /></a><br/><br/><center><hr width=75%></center><br/>A CHILLING ASPECT CAME TO MIND WHEN I NOTICED THAT THEY DID NOT INVOKE THEIR USUAL POSTER CHILD FOR PHILADELPHIA.<br/>Could his innocence be revealed... I can't imagine. After terrorizing that cop's wife for 30 years... I always had the feeling that may have been why they didn't execute him. Time will tell.Terancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8495349982447643424.post-68575953297217914912015-02-12T21:03:00.000-05:002015-02-19T16:11:24.588-05:00Justice Is Coming... Don't Count Me Out Just Yet.<table width="100%"><tr><td width="250">Feeling broken, <br/>Barely holding on<br/>But there's just something so strong<br/>Somewhere inside me.<br/><br/>I am down but I'll get up again.<br/>Don't count me out just yet.<br/><br/>I've been brought down to my knees and<br/>I've been pushed way past the point of breaking<br/>But I can take it.<br/><br/>I'll be back<br/>Back on my feet<br/>This is far from over.<br/><br/>You haven't seen the last of me.<br/>You haven't seen the last of me.<br/><br/>They can say that I won't stay around.<br/>But I'm gonna stand my ground.<br/>You're not gonna stop me.<br/><br/>You don't know me.<br/>You don't know who I am.<br/>Don't count me out so fast.<br/><br/>I've been brought down to my knees and<br/>I've been pushed way past the point of breaking<br/>But I can take it.<br/><br/>I'll be back<br/>Back on my feet<br/>This is far from over.<br/><br/>You haven't seen the last of me.<br/><br/>There will be no fade out.<br/>This is not the end.<br/>I'm down now.<br/>But I'll be standing tall again.<br/>Times are hard.<br/>I was built tough.<br/>I'm gonna show you all what I'm made of.<br/><br/>I've been brought down to my knees and<br/>I've been pushed way past the point of breaking<br/>But I can take it.<br/><br/>I'll be back<br/>Back on my feet<br/>This is far from over.<br/><br/>I am far from over.<br/>You haven't seen the last of me.<br/><br/>No no. <br/>I'm not going nowhere. <br/>I'm staying right here.<br/><br/>Oh no. <br/>You won't see me begging. <br/>I'm not taking my bow.<br/><br/>Can't stop me. <br/>It's not the end.<br/>You haven't seen the last of me.<br/><br/>Oh no. <br/><br/>You haven't seen the last of me.<br/><br/>You haven't seen the last of me.<br/><br/><br/><center><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ZOU0mvP-Xvs" width="250" height="141" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></center></td><br/><td width="250"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-10879" src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1317873083-occupy-wall-street-protest-joined-by-unions-manhattan_858701-300x199.jpg" alt="1317873083-occupy-wall-street-protest-joined-by-unions--manhattan_858701" width="250" /><br/><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-10887" src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/images-1.jpg" alt="images (1)" width="250" /><br/><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-10886" src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/protests-300x300.jpg" alt="protests" width="250" /><br/><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-10888" src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/images-2.jpg" alt="images (2)" width="250" /><br/><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-10884" src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/15775898778_c1e3ab384c_z-300x215.jpg" alt="15775898778_c1e3ab384c_z" width="250" /><br/><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-10883" src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/nyc_1218-300x300.jpg" alt="nyc_1218" width="250" /><br/><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-10881" src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/390198_US-Protest-300x168.jpg" alt="390198_US-Protest" width="250" /><br/><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-10880" src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/article-protest-8-1204-300x200.jpg" alt="article-protest-8-1204" width="250" /></td></tr></table><br/>As a nation, the People are speaking in one voice. Misreported dissonance seeks to disperse the unity. Widespread injustice which is bringing people together, recognizing the problem, and focusing on resolution. <br/><br/><center><em>When injustice becomes law resistance becomes duty<br/>We don't forget our martyrs.<br/>Afraid of those who swore to protect me.<br/>The system isn't broken, it was built this way.<br/>Sorry for the inconvenience. We are trying to change the world.<br/>United States of What The Fuck?<br/>We won't stop. Know Justice. Know Peace.<br/>The dead cannot cry out for justice. It is the duty of the living to do so for them.<br/>Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.</em></center><br/><br/><center><em>A revolution is coming - a revolution which will be peaceful if we are wise enough; <br/>compassionate if we care enough; successful if we are fortunate enough - <br/>but a revolution which is coming whether we will it or not. <br/>We can affect its character; we cannot alter its inevitability.</em></center><br/><br/><center><em>Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.</em></center><br/><br/><br/><center><hr width=75%></center><br/><strong>America's 'most trusted' news anchor was just sidelined by a 10 year old anecdote? ... not a news story.</strong> The mantle passes to the next, the consistent, the trusted, the understood, the familiar, someone who can point to the ridiculousness while unintimidated.<br/><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Jon-Stewart-007-300x180.jpg" alt="Jon-Stewart-007" width="275" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-10902" />A man who knows a fake news story when he writes one.<br/> <br/>Jon Stewart could not have chosen a worse time to consider leaving The Daily Show.<br/><br/>Americans are not going to have an easy time finding their humor while trying to rebuild and restore 'the public trust'.<br/><br/><center><hr width=75%></center><br/><br/><h2>A JUDICIARY HELD HOSTAGE</h2><br/>Ignoring the rule of law and the US Constitution until the people would notice a judiciary held hostage, undone by an unconstitutional law which they enacted, which they cannot correct. Their law mandates confidentiality where the integrity of the judiciary is adversely affected.<br/><br/>THIS UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW mandates non-disclosure of injustice and corruption, prevents correction and conceals exposure of responsibility. THE SAME LAW improperly enacted in EVERY state has undermined the judicial branch and prevented JUSTICE in the state courts and federally.<br/><br/>THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW serves to benefit only the authors, The American Bar Association with membership and affiliate organizations in every jurisdiction intercepting and interfering with the administration of justice to 'PROTECT' the judiciary which they hold hostage. <br/><br/>Their membership, and every lawyer and legal professional, under an aggressively enforced mandate of non-disclosure pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct - an ethical standard without ethics, morals or legality - improperly enacted by each state supreme court while the collateral unconstitutional injustice cannot be resolved within the courts - not without a lawyer<br/><br/>A pro se litigant would be required to have standing - to have experienced the unconstitutional corruption and injustice and survive - to have experienced the unconstitutional non-disclosure - and be able to provide evidence to support and demonstrate the collateral unconstitutional effect - and to have discovered the law which required mandated and ignored the INJUSTICE. <br/><br/>The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 was filed on August 8, 2013 in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and served upon the attorneys general in EVERY state on behalf of the United States by two pro se litigants with standing and a cause for relief which could be addressed by the attorneys general.<br/><br/>After default by every state attorney general, the matter was improperly dismissed based on misapplied doctrine and unsubstantiated speculation. Affirmed in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals with Reconsideration denied. The litigants never saw a courtroom. There is no signature by any judge. Everything on paper.<br/><br/>When removing the 'fraud provisions' from Rule 1.6, the ABA realized that their 'ethical' standard would permit, endorse and even MANDATE fraud - in the furtherance of fraud or to prevent rectifying prior fraud - which preventing any resolution. <br/><br/>Did the clerks (lawyers) in the Eastern District of Philadelphia believe that their fraud and forgery would no unnoticed? Did the Clerks (lawyers) in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals believe the same?<br/><br/>The judges were prevented from the case... held hostage by the continuing efforts of lawyers following the 'LOCAL RULES' and Rule 1.6. The US Attorney, the DOJ and the Federal Marshalls mandated by the McDade-Murtha Amendment - which requires all federal government attorneys and investigators to adhere to the Rules of Professional Conduct in the jurisdiction where they are working, or investigating.<br/><br/><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/holder-300x250.jpg" alt="holder" width="200" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-10928" />Congress was not fully informed during hearings on the McDade Murtha Amendment, where those lawyers testifying that the result would be DISASTROUS to the nation, Rule 1.6 prevented disclosure that the state ethics laws <strong>were not ethical, moral. legal or constitutional.</strong><br/><br/>While demonstrating to the ABA membership and their judicial hostages that the INJUSTICE is not systemic, it is by design. Efforts to deny, prevent and obstruct rights secured by the US Constitution seemingly ignored, yet, without any obligation to an unconstitutional law, a nullity, the day is coming when Rule 1.6 will provide no protection for the injustice, corruption and perversion of law which it conceals. <br/><br/>When Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane recognized the unconstitutional law, she was served with 'confidential' court orders from two unidentified courts, brought before a grand jury with requirements of secrecy, and attacked by suggestions she had violated a prior grand jury secrecy requirement. The fraud in the furtherance is catching up to the court staff in Montgomery County and the Superior Court of Philadelphia.<br/><br/>Concern from a state representative has called for the impeachment of AG Kane where she had recognized and not defended a state law which was unconstitutional. Though proven unconstitutional, the Attorney General's failure to support and defend an unconstitutional law has caused some concern within the Pennsylvania Legislature.<br/><br/>They should be examining those secret orders, improperly issued and void of due process, they are a CRY FOR RELEASE from a judiciary held hostage. <br/><br/>Until the Pennsylvania Legislature recognizes and suspends Rule 1.6, and realizes the Judiciary Committees are permitted to commit fraud to prevent and misinform, the entire nation awaits the moment when Kathleen Kane breaks her silence. <br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/storm-b98028119f103d82.jpg"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/storm-b98028119f103d82-300x224.jpg" alt="storm-b98028119f103d82" width="300" height="224" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-10930" /></a><br/>While the media reports and ponders and speculates... A tornado of secrecy and confidentiality which clearly has enveloped Harrisburg, PA... and has that girl's house spinning. <br/><br/>The victims of injustice persevere. <br/><br/><center>There will be no fade out. This is not the end. <br/>This is far from over.</center><br/><br/><center><h2>Justice is coming. Every. Person. Matters.</h2></center><br/><br/><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/quote-a-revolution-is-coming-a-revolution-which-will-be-peaceful-if-we-are-wise-enough-compassionate-robert-kennedy-243258.jpg" alt="quote-a-revolution-is-coming-a-revolution-which-will-be-peaceful-if-we-are-wise-enough-compassionate-robert-kennedy-243258" width="550" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-10891" /><br/><br/><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/quote-those-who-make-peaceful-revolution-impossible-will-make-violent-revolution-inevitable-john-f-kennedy-100760.jpg" alt="quote-those-who-make-peaceful-revolution-impossible-will-make-violent-revolution-inevitable-john-f-kennedy-100760" width="550" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-10890" />Terancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8495349982447643424.post-49284805092163973152015-02-11T04:26:00.000-05:002015-02-19T16:11:24.562-05:00Messages from the hostages to Kathleen KaneI have <a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/2014/11/noticecomplaint-of-unconstitutional-actions/" title="Notice/Complaint of Unconstitutional Actions" target="_blank">reported the judiciary held hostage</a> situation within the Superior Court of Pennsylvania to all proper law enforcement authorities to investigate and prosecute.<br/><ul><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/2014/11/letter-to-us-attorney-zane-memeger/" title="Letter to US Attorney Zane Memeger" target="_blank">US Attorney Zane Memeger, Eastern District of Pennsylvania</a> <br/>Philadelphia District Attorney Seth Williams, <br/>Bucks County District Attorney David Heckler, <br/>PA Attorney General Kathleen Kane, <br/>The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, and <br/>the USPS Postal Inspectors, Philadelphia (Mail Fraud).</ul><br/><br/>They have done NOTHING. They are compromised and leveraged to conceal their participation in the conspiracy to undermine the Judicial Branch of each state Government and the Federal Judiciary. They are members of the organization profiting from the corruption and INJUSTICE.<br/><br/>The hostages have repeated contacted with only one person. One may still have principles - fewer, if any, skeletons in her professional closet - nothing to leverage.<br/><center><h2><em>“something that’s been on my mind. But I’m very confident that <br/>the truth will come out and that justice will prevail.”</em></h2><br/>- Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane</center><br/><br/><h2><br/>SECRET ORDER</h2><br/>A judge has issued an order to the Attorney General of Pennsylvania which prevents identification of the court, the case and the issue.<br/><br/>The 'unidentified' have ordered the attorney general to conduct no investigation and neglect the responsibilities of the Office of the Attorney General.<br/><br/>These 'unlawful and corrupt' actions impose a personal liability upon the individual for that compromise of principles and law and the Constitution of the United States.<br/><br/>Bear in mind, THAT PERSONAL LIABILITY will be decided by another court - another judiciary held hostage where the failure to compromise could result in the personal loss of EVERYTHING. <br/>(Secure your personal assets. Consider filing for Divorce?)<br/><br/>The judiciary held hostage was coerced to issue an improper and invalid order. A demonstration that 'judicial independence' is compromised.<br/><br/><h2>ANOTHER SECRET ORDER</h2><br/>Another unidentified judge has issued a SECOND ORDER to the Attorney General of Pennsylvania which prevents identification of the court, the case and the issue.<br/><br/>The demands are the same - conduct no investigation and neglect the responsibilities of the Office of the Attorney General while RISKING EVERYTHING KATHLEEN KANE OWNS PERSONALLY.<br/><br/>The hostage judges have issued another improper and invalid example that the Judiciary is undone - no law, no constitution, no ethics, no procedure. No explanation of what has necessitated their pre-emptive efforts. Preventing the unidentified issue before it is presented to the courts. Constitutional separation of powers does not allow for this broad overreach into the authority of the Executive branch. <br/><br/>The judiciary held hostage calling attention to the situation.<br/><br/><h2>GRAND JURY THREAT</h2><br/>A Grand Jury has accused the individual, Kathleen Kane, of compromising grand jury secrecy even where she had not taken any part in the investigation, had not been called to answer questions by that grand jury, and was under no requirement to maintain grand jury secrecy.<br/><br/>The threat of incarceration for actions which violate no law. There are no facts available.<br/><br/>The information available has been 'leaked' by a second grand jury investigating the breach within the earlier one.<br/><br/>A grand jury is widely known as the 'tool of the prosecutor' where a ham sandwich could be indicted upon the simple request of the prosecutor. Indictment is not conviction.<br/><br/>The grand jury has not been assembled lawfully. Yet, 'leaked' portions of a secret presentment attack Kathleen Kane calling for an indictment - BUT pass that responsibility to the District Attorney who indicates the issue will take months to review. <br/><br/>The threat of incarceration - against the freedom of the attorney general is clear. Everything else could not be further obfuscated from public view, applicable law and fact. All delayed to permit speculation which undermines the attorney general who cannot say or do anything while those secret orders are appealed.<br/><br/><h2>THREAT OF IMPEACHMENT</h2><br/>One state legislator persists in the effort seeking to remove the attorney general from her elected office. He has failed to accept that an unconstitutional law is NO LAW, a nullity. He has failed to accept that multiple Federal Courts have indicated the law was unconstitutional. He has failed to accept that the Attorney General is not required by law to compromise her principles to defend a state law which is unconstitutional.<br/><br/>The threat of impeachment is improper. It is misinformation and manipulation of the public based on bigotry and hate. It neglects to indicate that the Attorney General was correct when indicating the law was unconstitutional.<br/><br/><h2>A CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUE OF NATIONAL IMPORTANCE</h2><br/>A constitutional challenge was filed in August 2013 and served upon Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane and the attorneys general of each state to address the unconstitutional collateral affect where a law causes the loss of any protection of the law and the loss of rights secured and protected by the Constitution of the united States.<br/><br/>Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct had been improperly enacted into law by the state supreme court where their authority to enact law existed only where their law did not affect the substantive rights of a litigant.<br/><br/>Enacted in 1987 in Pennsylvania, Rule 1.6 Confidentiality has prevented and denied litigants of their rights and the protection of the law while mandating non-disclosure and confidentiality by lawyers and all legal professionals. Every state had enacted the Rules of Professional Conduct into law from 1984 (New Jersey) to 2009 (Maine). <br/><br/>Americans noticed the lapse of the US Constitution, however lawyers and legal professionals were mandated to confidentiality and non-disclosure of the source for unconstitutional acts and INJUSTICE.<br/><br/><h2>A TERRORISTIC DIVORCE</h2><br/>In Montgomery County Pennsylvania, HEALY v HEALY and HEALY v MILLER had appealed to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania for relief from invalid orders which fail to apply the rule of law, and from defective and void orders issued in clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction which have been repeatedly enforced.<br/><br/>The terror inflicted by twenty judges upon the unrepresented non-lawyer defendant was unexplained and without any basis in law. The judiciary annihilated every aspect of his life. Every action had one unifying aspect - the silence. <br/><br/>From 2007 through 2013, every proceeding, every ruling, every action, every failure to follow procedure, law and constitution; every action to conceal information, every false report; every false allegation; every failed investigation by state and federal agencies; EVERYTHING pointed to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality preventing disclosure and permitting acts in the furtherance of fraud which prevented any resolution ever.<br/><br/><ul><br/>The 'fraud provisions' had been removed from the Rules of Professional Conduct - the code of ethical conduct - lacked ethics, lacked morality, endorsed fraud, prevented any recourse, while demanding non-disclosure and confidentiality (Rule 1.6).</ul><br/><br/><h2>Challenge to the Constitutionality of a State Law</h2><br/>Where the appeals to the Superior Court would present the challenge to the constitutionality of a state law, the Attorney General was notified and prevented from action by a 'secret order... and another secret order. The docket indicates superior court activity which has not been provided - kept 'secret'.<br/><br/>The Attorney General neglected the responsibility for involvement in the matter.<br/><br/>Where an earlier grand jury may have caused information to be removed from the public view, many documents were missing from the court record sent to the Superior Court from the Montgomery County. Requests for the production of the missing items were ignored, and remain unexplained.<br/><br/>Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane recognizing the unconstitutional affect of Rule 1.6, with no necessity to abide by an unconstitutional law for confidentiality and non-disclosure, was SILENCED by an improper secret court order.<br/><br/>And SILENCED further by another secret court order.<br/><br/>And SILENCED further by the threat where anything she said could be alleged to be part of a grand jury investigation.<br/><br/>And SILENCED further by the presentment of 'leaked speculation' and the pending threat of undisclosed documents.<br/><br/><h2>The Proper Authorities</h2><br/>The fraud and forgery of the Central Legal Staff - obstructed violations of procedure, Pennsylvania Law and the US Constitution demonstrated the unconstitutionality of Rule 1.6 within the Superior Court - reported to US Attorney Zane Memeger, Philadelphia District Attorney Seth Williams, Bucks County District Attorney David Heckler, PA Attorney General Kathleen Kane, The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, and the USPS Postal Inspectors (Mail Fraud).<br/><br/>NOTHING... Without obligatory silence per an unconstitutional law? Where only ONE been contacted and ordered to neglect and ignore the responsibilities of their office? Why are ALL neglecting their duty and responsibilities?<br/><br/>The carefully worded statements of Kathleen Kane indicate her awareness of the broader scope of the matter.<br/><ul>"I am shocked at the level of public corruption.”<br/>“I am shocked at how deep it goes.<br/>I am shocked at how powerful it is.<br/>I have never seen anything like this. It’s breathtaking.<br/>It has been described by the people familiar with what is happening as shameful.”</ul><br/><br/><ul>“But, if this can be done to me as Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer of the 5th largest state in the country, I am sickened to think what can and may be done to regular, good people who don’t have the resources that I have to challenge it.”</ul><br/><br/><h2>WHO COULD POSSIBLY DO THIS?</h2><br/>The American Bar Association, and affiliates, who have intervened and intercepted to deny and prevent exposure of their sedition and the resulting INJUSTICE within the state and federal courts..<br/><br/>They are the authors of Rule 1.6 who promoted it to every state and the US Congress and have affiliates in every level and jurisdiction of the state and federal courts.<br/><br/>The membership who profited from INJUSTICE and controlled by members which include the district attorneys and the US attorneys who ignore the complaints of criminal and unconstitutional corruption within the courts - their actions pursuant to unconstitutional Rule 1.6 Non-Disclosure and Confidentiality.<br/><br/>An organization who perverted and twisted the judicial branch of every state government by the requirement of SILENCE while leveraging the shame and humiliation of an egregious violation of the Public Trust to undermine JUSTICE in the United States.<br/><br/><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/10584105_10152469853859398_6925911722687697300_n-300x198.jpg" alt="10584105_10152469853859398_6925911722687697300_n" width="300" height="198" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-8987" />An organization whose members undermined a Constitutional Challenge in the Eastern District Court of Pennsylvania where improper actions had resulted in an unsubstantiated dismissal with no evidence of ANY judicial review resulting in the continuation of unconstitutional actions and INJUSTICE in every state - NATIONWIDE - while solely attributed to the purported actions of Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane.<br/><br/><h2>SET UP ACCOUNTABILITY and THREAT OF LIABILITY</h2> <br/>Kathleen Kane, the individual, has been set up and is responsible for concealing and preventing resolution of a national conspiracy to deny the constitutional rights of EVERY American without availability of any immunity.<br/><br/>By its terms, Section 1983 imposes liability without defense on state and local officials who, acting under color of law in their individual capacity, deprive plaintiffs of rights created by the Constitution and federal law.<br/><br/>“Career lawmen think strategically. They don’t go for the immediate gratification of a personal attack, instead preferring to set the board up just right and striking at the precise moment where the object of the attack cannot recover.” - Bruce Castor, Montgomery County Commissioner and former District Attorney in a <a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/2015/01/commissioner-bruce-castor-schooled-in-how-to-really-hurt-you-and-to-screw-others/" title="Commissioner Bruce Castor “schooled in how to really hurt you” and “to [screw] others”">New Years Eve Manifesto</a> against Attorney General Kathleen Kane.<br/><br/>Kathleen Kane filed for divorce in December 2014, securing her family's assets during an aggressive attack against her principles while indicating <em>“something that’s been on my mind. But I’m very confident that the truth will come out and that justice will prevail.”</em><br/><br/><h2>I BELIEVE.</h2> <br/>I believe that no one involved in this corruption has arrived there of their own will, BUT, once they involved they have no available way of removing themselves from the situation. They are obligated by an unconstitutional law which the are mandated to conceal by law. They also have no standing to challenge the law which did not directly affect their rights. <br/><br/>Don't hate the lawyer. DO HATE the unethical unconstitutioal law by which they must abide and are required to conceal... Where they are permitted to commit fraud to prevent disclosure, there are some who seem mandated to do so. This is a corrupt and unjust law.<br/><br/>Don't hate the judiciary. The undermined judges lost their judicial independence. They were required to sacrifice their integrity. The judges have been humiliated by their corruption and injustice and unconstitutional acts. The independence to make the decision was imaginary where required to conceal prior injustice and corruption.<br/><br/><h2>Judges Lack Jurisdiction/Authority</h2><br/>The lack of judicial independence causes their every decision to have been made without proper jurisdiction. Without lawful authority or power to act, every decision was an act of treason. Plea agreements were preferable to acts of treason which deprived people of their freedom. Plea Agreements - having people put themselves in jail was better than ACTING WITHOUT AUTHORITY. If the people ever found out, there would be ... <br/><br/>The state supreme courts - they blew it. Violating the public trust, they overreached their constitutional authority and enacted unconstitutional and unethical laws into existence. A corrupt law among them prevented them from correcting, acknowledging or resolving their grievous error. Where there was no authority to enact the laws, there was now a mandate to conceal their violation. Those supreme court justices responsible have likely retired and died leaving the judiciary undone, the US Constitution ignored, and the government in jeopardy. <br/><br/><h2>FULL CONTROL OF JUDICIAL BRANCH</h2><br/>The American Bar Association, and affiliate organizations, provided their members with training to intervene, intercept and conceal the corruption and injustice of the undermined judicial branch. The ABA had complete control of the judicial branch. Every lawyer and legal professional under their control with discipline at their sole discretion - well, the sole discretion of THEIR state supreme courts. The lawyers in the legislature, and the judiciary committees, kept the legislators out of the 'business of the courts'. <br/><br/><h2>UNDERMINING THE SHERIFFS</h2><br/>Where not removed entirely from existence, the sheriffs were convinced of diminished responsibilities by lawyers and judges. The Chief Law Enforcement Officer in the county was relegated to taxiing prisoners and providing security of the judges/courtroom. The injustice and corruption of the judges would require they be protected. The sheriffs provided support for the illusion of judicial independence. District Attorneys usurped authority under a title Chief Law Enforcement Professional.<br/><br/><h2>PREVENTING FEDERAL INTERVENTION</h2> <br/>The US Congress made a similar error in trust called the McDade-Murtha Amendment. Testimony to Congress was affected by Rule 1.6, those testifying to congress were not permitted by law to provide full information. Indicating the disastrous result while neglecting to reveal that requiring all government attorneys to follow the state 'Rules of Professional Conduct' was blindly ignoring that the ethics laws enacted in the states were not ethical, moral, legal or just. This Amendment prevent the federal government from intervening where the loss of constitutional rights was required to be concealed by Rule 1.6 Confidentiality.<br/><br/><h2>PRO SE LOOPHOLE</h2><br/>The ABA never imagined a Pro Se defendant annihilated by their corruption and injustice would survive to identify, document and expose their sedition to very lawyers and judges compromised and participating in systemic corruption and injustice without reaon or explanation.<br/><br/>Neither did I. BUT, where I was left with no choice but to persevere, I DID. <br/><br/><center>"Wait until they realize what you have discovered."</center><br/><br/>I brought the Constitutional Challenge of rule 1.6, the corruption and the loss of integrity to the Judiciary who failed to recognize themselves. The minions intercepted and intervened... a new realization and awareness of their actions which had been previously unexposed. Believing they disposed of the pro se cases because the people were non-lawyers, the staff were obstructing and preventing the only party who could lawfully expose the unconstitutional corruption and injustice AND restore the integrity of the judiciary.<br/><br/>The Court Clerks/Staff provided the persistence of the CONTROLLED corruption and injustice. It was NOT systemic.<br/><br/><h2>CEASE AND DESIST</h2><br/>I notified the American Bar Association, and all affiliates, to cease and desist all operations in September 2014. There has been no response.<br/><br/>I persevere.<br/><br/><h2>JUSTICE IS COMING. EVERY. PERSON. MATTERS.</h2>Terancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8495349982447643424.post-58785353718862031202015-02-10T19:26:00.000-05:002015-02-19T16:11:24.539-05:00Castle Doctrine 'against an intruder in their home"<img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/0904011043a-300x225.jpg" alt="0904011043a" width="300" height="225" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-4585" />I hold a valid title and deed to my home and property, and those trespassing DO NOT.<br/><br/>The Court has indicated a lack of jurisdiction which has been affirmed by the Superior Court and denied Reconsideration, thus removing the courts from any involvement regarding the issue of possession.<br/><br/>The decisions and documents prevent any judicial intervention to my regaining possession of the property. Where the court lacks jurisdiction to decide possession, they also lack jurisdiction to prevent me from regaining possession.<br/><br/>Their decision is incorrect and/or the fraud and forgery of the Central Legal Staff. In the effort, they deny constitutionally protected rights - availability of the court for redress of grievances - and interfere with the administration of the courts while preventing and obstructing Pennsylvania law. <br/><center><strong><em>Rule 1.6 Injustice - no protection of the law. No constitutional rights.</em></strong></center><br/>No prosecution of the staff has yet occured in response to my criminal complaint to the US DOJ, two counties, two state and one other federal investigating agency.<br/> <br/>Where the court negligence has deliberately prevented an Action in Ejectment which is proper when the Plaintiff does not have possession. A Quiet Title is only permitted to be filed by the person in possession. Well the one's with the INVALID DEED are not likely to do that. I must regain possession and quiet the title from the multiple fraudulent filings and forgeries by Genuine Title.<img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/mob2-300x191.jpg" alt="mob2" width="300" height="191" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-6707" /><br/><br/>I have written to the Governor, the state Attorney General and the Montgomery County Sheriff requesting their assistance in regaining possession of the property. The Executive Branch of Government enforces the law. <br/><br/>The question remains if the 'secret orders' from unidentified courts will prevent the attorney general from her responsibilities - a broad pre-emptory <em>SECRET</em> overreach and violation of the separation of powers determined to prevent my rights and the law. (Rule 1.6 Corruption)<br/><br/><br/><h2>The Castle Doctrine ...</h2><br/><center><table width=90%><tr><td>The Castle Doctrine assumes that an “attacker” or “intruder” intends great bodily harm if<br/>he/she either:<br/>1. unlawfully and forcefully enters a dwelling, residence or occupied vehicle, or<br/>2. is attempting to unlawfully and forcefully remove someone from a dwelling, residence or occupied vehicle<br/><br/>Either of these circumstances results in an initial presumption that a person (who is aware that 1. or 2. above have occurred) is justified in using deadly force in self defense against the “attacker” or “intruder.”<br/><br/>NOTE: This rule does NOT APPLY if ANY of the following apply:<br/>• the “attacker” or “intruder” is another resident or has a right to be in the dwelling, residence or occupied vehicle;<br/>• the “attacker” or “intruder” is a parent, grandparent or other guardian removing a child from the dwelling, residence or occupied vehicle;<br/>• the “attacker” or “intruder” is actually a law enforcement officer engaged in the performance of his duties; OR<br/>• the “attack” or “intrusion” is related to criminal activity in the dwelling, residence or occupied vehicle (e.g., an “attacker” breaks into a home to steal drugs from a drug dealer). <br/></td></tr></table></center><br/><br/>Some state self defense laws include provisions that address duty to retreat from an intruder in one’s home or from an attacker in other places.<br/><br/><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/courtesy-kndu.com_1-300x169.jpg" alt="courtesy-kndu.com_1" width="250" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-10818" />The common law principle of “castle doctrine” says that individuals have the right to use reasonable force, including deadly force, to protect themselves against an intruder in their home. This principle has been codified and expanded by state legislatures. <br/><br/>Florida’s law states “a person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force, if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.”<br/><br/><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/tumblr_m1akjchifp1qmaoalo1_r1_1280.png" alt="tumblr_m1akjchifp1qmaoalo1_r1_1280" width="550" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-10819" /><br/><br/>Laws in at least 22 states allow that there is no duty to retreat an attacker in any place in which one is lawfully present. (Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and West Virginia.) <br/><br/>At least nine of those states include language stating one may “stand his or her ground.” (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and South Carolina.)<br/><br/>Pennsylvania's law, amended in 2011, distinguishes use of deadly force outside one’s home or vehicle. It provides that in such locations one cannot use deadly force unless he has reasonable belief of imminent death or injury, and either he or she cannot retreat in safety or the attacker displays or uses a lethal weapon. <br/><br/>Self defense laws in at least 22 states (Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Montana, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee West Virginia and Wisconsin) provide civil immunity under certain self defense circumstances. <br/><br/>Statutes in at least six states (Hawaii, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Dakota and Tennessee) assert that civil remedies are unaffected by criminal provisions of self defense law.Terancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8495349982447643424.post-9346602555503170972015-02-10T18:40:00.000-05:002015-02-19T16:11:24.516-05:00If you don't believe that Rule 1.6 happened... Look to Oklahoma<img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/oklahoma-300x155.jpg" alt="oklahoma" width="200" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-10810" />The word out of Oklahoma this week is the introduction of a Bill in their Legislature to prevent prosecution for abuse of power by limiting the ability to prosecute exclusively to the state Attorney General.. to the exclusion of the District Attorneys.<br/><br/><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/why-kids-think-they-are-invisible-when-playing-peek-a-boo-300x225.jpg" alt="why-kids-think-they-are-invisible-when-playing-peek-a-boo" width="200" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-10601" />With the current effort to remove an unconstitutional law which has been concealed under the disinformation that it is 'attorney-client privilege" and where it results in devastating and inescapable loss of constitutional rights of the victim FOREVER... and where Rule 1.6 clearly demonstrates the unconstitutional ability and the defiance to being addressed - because lawyers may not reveal the TRUTH. <br/><br/>OKLAHOMA - Are y'all out of your ever-lovin minds?<br/><br/>The ABA presented Rule 1.6 a law which undermined the authority of every state judiciary and held the judiciary hostage shown by their loss of judicial independence. The ABA knew that their ethics code lacked ethics, morality and lawfulness. Against the advice of Robert Kutek who wrote the 'Rules', the ABA deliberately removed 2 fraud provisions from the law which could have prevented 30 years of injustice and unconstitutionality. Kids for Cash in Luzerne County Pennsylvania. Over 48 million forcerclosures using fraudulent anf forged robosigned documents. INJUSTICE throughout the entire US. An overwhelming realization that the Constiotution was being ignored by those who had sworn to preserve protect and defend it.<br/><br/><center><h2>OKLAHOMA - Are y'all out of your ever-lovin minds?</h2></center><br/><br/><a href="http://newsok.com/oklahoma-lawmaker-wants-to-bar-das-from-charging-state-officials/article/5389767"><h2>Oklahoma lawmaker wants to bar DAs from charging state officials</h2></a><br/>District attorneys across Oklahoma are upset with proposed legislation that would bar them from prosecuting any state official for a public offense.<br/><br/><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/calvey-300x291.jpg" alt="calvey" width="200" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-10805" />Only the attorney general could file those criminal cases, if House Bill 2206 becomes law.<br/><br/>“It’s a big deal to me. I’m upset and concerned,” Oklahoma County District Attorney David Prater said. “This bill creates a different class of citizens that would be protected from the normal prosecution process.”<br/><br/>He questioned if the bill is retaliation for his prosecutions of legislators, a judge and members of the Pardon and Parole Board.<br/><br/>“I am suspicious ... that is what this is really about,” Prater said.<br/><a href="http://newsok.com/oklahoma-lawmaker-wants-to-bar-das-from-charging-state-officials/article/5389767">Link to full story.</a><br/><br/><hr><br/><br/><a href="http://www.dcclothesline.com/2015/02/10/elected-law-bill-exempt-lawmakers-prosecution-nearly-crimes/" target="_blank"><h2>Elected and Above the Law: Bill “Would Exempt Lawmakers from Prosecution of Nearly Any Crimes”</h2></a><br/><br/>This one is just too rich. The arrogance and absurdity is over the top.<br/><br/><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/get-out-of-jail-free-300x189.jpg" alt="get-out-of-jail-free" width="200" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-10808" />Granted, most of the political class is already de facto above the law to begin with.<br/><br/>But now, a lawmaker in Oklahoma has introduced a bill to officially give most lawmakers, judges, appointees and holders of high office immunity from prosecution.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.dcclothesline.com/2015/02/10/elected-law-bill-exempt-lawmakers-prosecution-nearly-crimes/" target="_blank">Link to Full Story</a><br/><br/><hr>Terancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8495349982447643424.post-70929697135975204152015-02-09T05:30:00.000-05:002015-02-19T16:11:24.473-05:00with apologies to Oprah. You're being sued. And You're being sued. And
You're being sued.The volume of correspondence being prepared this week is daunting. Their injustice clock runs on billable hours. Time slows when every hope becomes a further injustice and corruption. Where isolated from family and the milestones which build into a life, time stops.<br/><br/>Those who offer the Facebook meme versions of Let It Go, Get Over It, Move On, This Too Shall Pass... have failed to recognize I am surviving, nothing more. THIS TOO SHALL PASS was wrong in 2007. You did not believe me, trust my judgement, the logical fail, my rationale... they played you against me. Friendships waned. <br/><br/>No one wants to live a life void of joy where other people's smiles make you wonder if you will ever have cause to smile again. Somehow, I persevere. <br/><br/><Center><hr width=75%></center><br/><br/>I have never done anything where the sole intent was to demonstrate that failure of a system or the person involved. That was always a consequence within their own control. I had no ability to cause people to do the right thing. At best, I could provide them the opportunity. Every response provided the chance for explanations which were not provided, or were deliberately concealed. <br/><br/>A stranger lies. The lie is contrary to reason and lacking any necessity or motivation. When asked to explain, they panic acting fearful and threatened - - You made no threat, but someone else has. When asking for an explanation, the answer "I need my job" demonstrates the intimidation involved. Their supervisors never responded. Everything - ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING - and EVERYONE at the courthouse was 'affected' by the corruption and injustice... and fearful of exposing it further. They knew the retaliatory realities of judges and lawyers. I was learning that reality. <br/><br/>Every proceeding and action in the divorce from 2007 forward had been affected - manipulated by secrecy, failure to apply the law, no explanations, no resolutions. Every injustice was a FARCE which when exposed resulted in the recusal of the judge and another judfge assigned. Twenty Judges have been directly involved in the matter with each sacrificing their integrity for the failure of the prior judges - mandated by Rule 1.6.<br/><br/>Farce is not an overly broad generalization. It is fact. Evidence is the court record, the hundred of documents filed. <br/><br/>I was being prosecuted/terrorized to the fullest extent of every law and court order and defending against every false allegation held accountable to know and follow every procedure and law. Any, every and All failures by my wife, and her attorneys, to follow the law, procedures, due process, court orders, courtroom protocol were excused without consequence or warning for continued failures. Their deliberate failures lead to the situation which is undeniable. The judge to issued an order in the clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction, a defective and void order which is void ab initio, evidence is clearly demonstrated in 'the court record'. BUT the lawyers still present the defective order for enforcement... successfully... even on appeal, successfully... leveraging the exposure of the corruption of the court for further injustice while preventing any resolution. Rule 1.6 Injustice. FOREVER. <br/><br/>Everything was undermined by the necessity to NOT REVEAL the secret, or prevent discovery. EVER. No law. No rights. No justice. None. EVER. FOREVER. No kidding. FOREVER. Another reality to learn because no one would believe it. Myself included. <br/><br/>The Rule 1.6 mandate of non-disclosure and confidentiality survives the death of the attorney. Forever.<br/><br/>Believe it. No justice. No escape. Ever. Forever.<br/><br/><Center><hr width=75%></center><br/><br/>Those who continue to undermine the US Constitution have been (and will be) compelled to public actions which they will not be able to deny or ignore or conceal or obfuscate. "Through their own words, they will be exposed." If one person had done the right thing at anytime, the situation would not have been able to continue. No one helped. So many people working against me in violation of the law and procedures. What could possibly cause so many people to fail without explanation or reason... It's their fault I found RULE 1.6 which undermined everyone and everything and every law including the US Constitution. <br/><br/>The law is clear about who may be held responsible for their failures to perform the responsibilities of their government office and whether they may be litigated professionally and PERSONALLY.<br/><br/>I have no other alternative but to present the illegal actions to persons who are in government positions where they recognize the corruption of the judiciary and DO NOTHING to address the wrongdoing. The lawyers and non-lawyers have no long term protection by and through an unconstitutional law and the corruption concealed by it.... except that the entire government has participated and concealed the corruption of the undermined judiciary under the false impression that it is better than addressing the problem.... which is HUGE. <br/><br/><h2>Americans must set pride aside, acknowledge the past injustice and rectify the government for the future.</h2><br/><center><h2> Every. Person. Matters.</h2></center><br/><br/><table width=100%><tr><td width=100%><br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/2014/12/its-about-how-we-represent-ourselves-to-the-world-mccain/"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/0-300x225.jpg" alt="0" width="300" height="225" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-9807"><br/><br/>"The truth is sometimes a hard pill to swallow. It sometimes causes us difficulties at home and abroad. It is sometimes used by our enemies in attempts to hurt us. But the American people are entitled to it, nonetheless." - Sen. John McCain<br/><br/></a><br/></td></tr></table><br/><br/>By its terms, US Section 1983 imposes liability without defense on state and local officials who, acting under color of law in their individual capacity, deprive plaintiffs of rights created by the Constitution and federal law.<br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/secrecy.jpg"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/secrecy-300x144.jpg" alt="secrecy" width="275" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-10756" /></a><br/>The Problem arises where Rule 1.6 being unconstitutional is No Law. A nullity. <br/>IT WAS, UNTIL IT ISN'T. AND THEN, it never was. <br/><br/>Unconstitutional secret secrecy is Rule 1.6 INJUSTICE.<br/><br/>While Rule 1.6 is mandating a conspiracy to deprive a person of rights and requiring the participation (or inaction or disinformation) of everyone required to follow it, there is no excuse in the 'Liability Game' for the actions which clearly deprive a person of their rights by a person who is sworn to protect their rights and who knows that their own actions are unconstitutional and repugnant.<br/><br/>PROFESSIONALLY - certain immunities apply to the organizations and officials involved in government, PERSONAL LIABILITY is another issue where a person knows better and has the responsibility to effect a change. The LAW has allowances built into the construction of the law which addresses the purpose and explains the reasoning and the proper application for the judiciary. No law violates the US Constitution.<br/><br/>The government is constitutional where allowing for review of constitutional questions by the judiciary. The Public Trusts the Judiciary. A necessity so essential that they trusted it would not be violated. Corrupt judges were hung because we trusted them. <br/><br/>A problem exists where there is no way to tell the judiciary that A LAW THE JUDICIARY ENACTED is unconstitutional. Done outside the normal legislative construction of a law, there was no construct, no explanation, no review, no reasoning, ... <em>and no legislative immunity for the authors</em>. The law mandating non-disclosure and confidentiality did not permit ANY lawyer to address the unconstitutional aspect or effects, and concealed fraud in the furtherance to prevent the situation from being rectified or exposed.<br/><br/>Injustice has thrived based on disinformation which distracts from the problem law. A perceived prideful judicial arrogance is leveraged while interference with the administration of justice conceals the violation of the public trust and the loss of judicial independence. Two essential elements have been surreptitiously removed from the US Justice system - the known point of failure was always the judiciary. The judiciary had been undermined and held hostage by the American Bar Association by a law which required that information be concealed... that the violation of the public trust be concealed... the loss of judicial independence was concealed... everything they were doing to conceal it was also concealed. Everything leveraged to the benefit of their membership - who had no idea how it broke, but knew something was not right. Everyone noticed the government was 'ignoring' the US Constitution.<br/><br/>When an individual person is participating in actions which they know to be wrong, and quite UNCONSTITUTIONAL, the law expects and requires them to do the right thing. They can be held professionally and personally responsible for their actions, or the failure to act, even where an unconstitutional law had them violate a person's rights.<br/><br/>The US Constitution does not provide any allowance for the denial of rights protected by the US Constitution. Any law which attempts to deny rights is No Law, a nullity, and provides no protection for participation in unconstitutional acts.<br/><br/>But, you must bring the case to the Judiciary. The judiciary who enacted the unconstitutional law, the nullity, in violation of the US Constitution AND THE CONSTITUTION OF EVERY STATE. You must bring the humiliatingly embarrassing case of AMERICAN INJUSTICE to those responsible for the INJUSTICE.<br/><br/>ONE OTHER THING, that unconstitutional law, Rule 1.6, mandates that they do nothing to expose that unconstitutional aspect. Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure by judges, lawyers or legal professionals. Rule 1.6 permits/requires further acts of fraud to prevent exposure, or where disclosure would rectify the matter.<br/><br/>Rule 1.6 permits/requires the failure to indicate that Rule 1.6 is the reason that you cannot have justice pursuant to Rule 1.6. Rule 1.6 will undermine the law and the courts while any attempt is made to address the unconstitutional results.<br/><br/>PENNSYLVANIA - The judiciary shut down the Attorney General in defiance of law, procedures, separation of powers, etc... They clearly realized that it was not just about the inappropriate relationships which delayed the prosecution of Jerry Sandusky, Kathleen Kane was about to blow the lid off of the INJUSTICE game - NATIONALLY! Two cases which by law required the Attorney General's attention as an unconstitutional state law would be demonstrated in the appeals. In the Superior Court of Pennsylvania - Healy v Healy and Healy v Miller.<br/><center><table width="95%"><br/><tbody><br/><tr><br/><td><br/>For example. You own a house. That house is illegally sold. <br/><br/>The law is clear. If you have possession, you file QUIET TITLE. If you do not have possession, you file EJECTMENT. <br/><br/>You file Ejectment and it is dismissed because you do not have possession. An error in application of law. On Appeal, it is affirmed. No Reconsideration. The judiciary neglects to address the proper law, neglects to apply that law to the situation, and neglects to address the issue. The 'elephant in the room', INJUSTICE, is being concealed pursuant to Rule 1.6. The court is mandated to conceal that Rule 1.6 is causing further Rule 1.6 injustice.<br/><br/>It defies logic. It defies common sense. They write pages, yet miss the mark. BECAUSE, the unconstitutional law requires that the unconstitutional law not be disclosed.<br/><br/>To conceal the judicial quagmire, the court staff intercepts and intervenes handling the matter without the involvement of the judiciary. Are the staff protecting the judges from the liability for unconstitutional actions? ... or holding the judiciary hostage by preventing the judge from the decision?<br/><br/>The criminal, and unconstitutional, interception and interference with the administration of justice and the forgery and fraud by the court staff are in the furtherance of a fraud, Non-Disclosure is mandated pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality. The court staff are professional lawyers who know their actions are violating the state and federal law and the US Constitution.<br/><br/>Where the court may not have believed when you indicated that the case would expose a constitutional issue, their own unconstitutional actions quickly convinces them.<br/><br/>(CONSIDER: Secret Order/Unidentified Court which prevents investigation and responsibilities of the Office of the Attorney General. <br/><br/>Where an unconstitutional law is a nullity, a court order must be followed while appealed even when improper, unlawful and unconstitutional. The 'secret' court order creates a liability, professionally and personally, for the Attorney General who is being required by court order to participate in a conspiracy to deny constitutionally protected rights. <br/><br/>Multiple actions to silence Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane are carefully exposed to the media. Without any allowance for explanation, the Attorney General must be silent or risk a contempt action for violating the court order. Two court orders - one for each appeal in Superior Court. <br/><br/>GRAND JURY SECRECY becomes an issue where allegations are 'leaked' suggesting violations by Kathleen Kane, personally and professionally as Attorney General. No explanations or details. Speculation is widespread misdirection, it is no coincidence that my cases are in Montgomery County. <br/><br/>CALL FOR IMPEACHMENT: A call is made to the Legislature to impeach Kathleen Kane for non-enforcement of an unconstitutional law - the Marriage issue - and the 'speculation' of the Grand Jury leaks. <br/><br/>EVERYTHING IS ABOUT THE SILENCING OF KATHLEEN KANE - under whom the 'monkeywrench' was thrown which undermined a Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 in the federal courts after every state attorney general intentionally defaulted. A very similar situation where everything was handled by the court staff without any evidence of judicial involvement. Reported to the US Marshalls and the DOJ, US Attorney general Eric Hodler and US Attorney Zane Memeger. SILENCE.)<br/><br/>Prosecution of the court staff would expose the unconstitutional effect of Rule 1.6 which has resulted in YOUR loss of any protection under the law AND loss of rights protected by the US Constitution. No PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW. NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. NO KIDDING.<br/><br/>The Crimes and Constitutional offenses were reported. I am still awaiting the investigation by<br/>1) Zane Memeger, US Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania<br/>2) Seth Williams, District Attorney for Philadelphia<br/>3) David Heckler, District Attorney for Bucks County<br/>4) Kathleen Kane, Pennsylvania Attorney General<br/>5) USPS, United States Postal Inspectors - Mail Fraud<br/>6) the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania<br/><br/>Their silence is unexplained. AG Kathleen Kane couldn't even say WHY she is being silent.<br/></td><br/></tr><br/></tbody><br/></table><br/></center><br/><br/>The Silence of Lawyers regarding an unconstitutional law which results in INJUSTICE, leaving people with no protection under the law while denying and ignoring rights protected and secured by the US Constitution with no opportunity for relief or resolution.<br/><br/>The Rules of Professional Conduct require lawyers to report this to the Judiciary. It is the law. If they did, it was not disclosed at any level. Rule 1,6 non-disclosure trumps that requirement. Rule 1.6 trumps every law, every constitution, every reform and mandates that it be concealed and any explanation prevented.<br/><br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/a-monolithic-and-ruthless-conspiracy.jpg"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/a-monolithic-and-ruthless-conspiracy-300x146.jpg" alt="a-monolithic-and-ruthless-conspiracy" width="300" height="146" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-10745" /></a><br/><br/>THAT IS WRONG. Ask a lawyer... but, they probably won't tell you. (At best you may hear 'attorney-client privilege' blah blah. It's not called attorney-client privilege. It is called Confidentiality of Information.)<br/><br/>AS FOR THE NEWS MEDIA??? Draw your own conclusions about the control of the news media in the US.<br/><br/>THE PENNSYLVANIA LEGISLATURE HAS THE ONLY AUTHORITY TO SUSPEND A LAW WITHIN THE COMMONWEALTH OF PA. While they not acting on the 'worst kept secret in Pennsylvania' people are suffering an incomprehensible injustice which is difficult to explain and they are killing themselves. Suicide is logical where there is no hope.<br/><br/>Where there may seem to be no hope, there is still a Constitution of the United States of America. Somewhere along the way, the Judiciary neglected the trust placed in them by the People. The Public Trust - The lawyers ripped of it's head. shit down it's throat and raped it leaving it for dead. Big mistake. HUGE. EVERY PERSON MATTERS.<br/><br/>The list of available immunities is considerably longer than one might believe. Judicial Immunity, Absolute Immunity, Absolute Judicial Immunity, Prosecutorial Immunity, Witness Immunity, Legislative Immunity, Qualified Immunity (Executive Officials), Established Law, Reason and Discretion. One thing which they all have in common... THERE IS NO IMMUNITY FOR VIOLATING THE CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED RIGHTS OF AMERICAN PEOPLE.<br/><br/>What has been happening is that Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information has prevented disclosure of the constitutional violations and prevented resolution of the crimes where it would expose that they are keeping a secret pursuant to their secret Rule 1.6 - which hides in plain site buried by cross references throughout the Rules of Professional Conduct - a minimum ethical standard which lacks ethics, morality and lawfulness - presented to every state Supreme Court and enacted into law at the behest of the American Bar Association.<br/><br/>The American Bar Association knew what they were doing when they deliberately removed the fraud provisions from Rule 1.6 in 1983. INJUSTICE IS A GOLDMINE - the ABA membership is the beneficiary to their unconstitutional law which holds a judiciary hostage - removing judicial independence from the judge and requiring injustice continue unexplained without resolution.<br/><br/>To the ABA, <br/>Close your doors now. Shut Down your corrupt and seditious organization... including the affiliates in every jurisdiction of state and federal judiciary. You tried to save the integrity of your profession by writing a code of ethical conduct, and you deliberately failed - at a considerable profit for some members but sacrificing any integrity, respect or honor for the remainder. <br/><br/>Rule 1.6 Peek-A-Boo Injustice cannot be concealed by an apathetic population who does not want to believe or accept that 48 million people lost their homes, thousands of children were jailed in Luzerne County, and people were murdered in Ferguson and New York without anyu opportunity for JUSTICE, or any relief from further injustice.<br/><br/>To the government officials who, once notified, are personally and professionally liable for their participation in the conspiracy to deny Americans of constitutionally protected rights. <br/><br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/oprah.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-10742" src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/oprah-300x200.jpg" alt="oprah" width="300" height="200" /></a>Do you really want me to bring you all into a courtroom to demonstrate Rule 1.6 INJUSTICE again. I have the confirmations of receipt by every state attorney general, every state governor, every senator in every state, the US Congress, the entire Pennsylvania Legislature, every sheriff in Pennsylvania, every judge in every court in Bucks and Montgomery Counties... It's not called the 'worst kept secret in Pennsylvania' for nothing.<br/><br/><br/>Is it your preference that Rule 1.6 be demonstrated in a courtroom before your very eyes... To see no protection under the law? To see denial of constitutional rights? <br/><br/><center><table width=90%><tr><td><br/>"They can't do that" going over and over in your head. "The judges are NOT supposed to do that." <br/><br/>"They are ignoring the law, the constitution, civil rights, human rights, ... They can't do that. BUT, THEY DID. He was correct. <br/><br/>He has no protection under the law and every constitutional right is being ignored. Why?<br/><br/>The judge just threw his case out of court but didn't indicate a reason, and explanation or any support in applicable law.<br/><br/>Rule 1.6 Confidentiality does not permit the judge to indicate that the current injustice was necessitated to conceal prior injustice pursuant to Rule 1.6 - - to conceal prior injustice before that... and before that... <br/><br/>Rule 1.6 has broken and undermined the entire judiciary and JUSTICE. Improper law? enacted by Judiciary without authority? no review for constitutionality? not constructed as law? no legislature? no governor signed it? enacted in every state? included in federal district courts (Local Rules)? included in federal Court of Appeals (Local Rules)? mandated to every federal government lawyer (McDade-Murtha Amendment)? <br/><br/>Did no one realize that the ABA Rule - the ethical standard for lawyers - lack ethics? morality? legality?<br/>or was every lawyer mandated to non-disclosure by Rule 1.6 and prevented from explaining what they meant to Congress when they indicated that McDade Murtha would have a disastrous result for the country.<br/>Did Rule 1.6 prevent the lawyers testifying before Congress from indicating that the state ethics laws lacked any ethics?<br/>... and permitted, endorse and required lawyers to participate in fraud in the furtherance of fraud? <br/>... even where it would rectify a prior fraud?<br/>... preventing every federal government lawyer from any action which exposes, investigates or prosecutes judicial corruption and injustice within the state courts... in every state ... even where constitutional rights are concerned.<br/><br/>Your lawyer just congratulated you on the 'BIG WIN' <br/>...but you are not permitted to discuss the issue ... or the case pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality<br/>... if you do, you would be prosecuted for your part in a conspiracy to deny the constitutional rights of an American<br/>... your hearing would not be publicized<br/>... your accidental suicide will be on the front pages - 'Defender of the Constitution'<br/>(This ironic award title is a standard practice by the American bar Association.... sometimes there's cash too.)<br/><em>It's just not even funny when it is true.</em><br/></td></tr></table></center><br/><br/>By neglect you encourage endorse and conceal an egregious violation of the Public Trust which harms Americans. <br/>There is no valid excuse for unconstitutional acts. That is treason.<br/><br/>The non-lawyer Legislators have an obligation to every American which cannot be ignored by an unconstitutional law.<br/>The non-lawyer legislators cannot ask their lawyers to advise them while their lawyers are obligated to commit fraud to conceal the injustice.<br/><br/>It is so wrong... affecting so many people... there is no argument offered ... no explanation... no justification,... no apology.<br/><br/>Surprise America!! - Your country was overthrown by lawyers 30 years ago. About fucking time you noticed. eh?<br/><br/><h2>Americans must set pride aside, acknowledge the past injustice and rectify the government for the future. <br/>Every. Person. Matters.</h2><br/><br/>SHUT RULE 1.6 DOWN NOW. Suspend this unconstitutional law and vaccinate the entire country... so this never happens again.<br/><br/>I will "GO FULL OPRAH" commencing litigation against every government official that ignored this matter for the last 9 years. Silence and Non-response will not provide any defense or immunity when you are on the wrong side of the US Constitution.<br/><br/>Where the courts sacrifice integrity to conceal the injustice, everyone loses. <br/><br/>The only person getting paid will be your lawyer who is relying on his non-disclosure and license for fraud in the furtherance to conceal the constitutional violation of his client.<br/><br/>As a person without any protection of the law and experiencing the denial of rights protected by the constitution, I have no choice but to persevere. I have demonstrated my ability to persevere through injustice since 2007. <br/><br/>County Court documents and transcripts were not available or presented for the recent appeal. The 'court' ignored without explanation.<br/><br/>A mountain of evidence seems to have been concealed by Montgomery County, a grand jury investigation may have been misdirected by a special prosecutor with a potential conflict of interest (being married to a judge and President of the Montgomery County Bar Association resulting in the unavailability of the evidence. <br/><br/>The failure of a prolonged investigation designed and determined to destroy a man which prevented any protections under the law while excessive and improper informants, handlers, private investigators, and detective shared surveillance products throughout the courts and every level of law enforcement contributed the inability of law enforcement to correct the errors and wrongdoing.<br/><br/>Secrecy is the thing that makes every evil far worse than it would have been.<br/><br/>The damage continues while I am denied any life, protection of the law and constitutional rights.<br/><br/>A JUDGE COVERED FOR A LAWYER WHO TOLD HER CLIENT TO COMMIT A FEDERAL CRIME. <br/>The efforts to conceal their injustice (court order found in 2010 after 3 years) has been an evil far worse than the initial injustice. <br/><br/>Twenty (20) judges, multiple courts. multiple appeals, federal constitutional challenges, every level of state and federal law enforcement, state and federal government, all prevented from any effort to help by a secrecy which overwhelmed and intimidated.<br/><br/>Only a sociopath, who was a lawyer, could have calculated and manipulated every situation and liability into one unconstitutional law - which mandates silence and permits continued terror.<br/><br/><h2>Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane:</h2><br/>I am coming to pry open your secret court orders. We have not spoken a single word to each other, yet I believe in you still.<br/><br/>My belief in people is the source of my perseverance, and my challenge to trust again.<br/><br/><br/><h2>Americans must set pride aside, acknowledge the past injustice and rectify the government for the future. <br/>Every. Person. Matters.</h2>Terancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8495349982447643424.post-62471025529855700572015-02-06T06:01:00.000-05:002015-02-19T16:11:24.439-05:00All about the Cover-Up...WHEN A YOUNG COLLEGE STUDENT GOES MISSING AND THE ENTIRE COUNTY BEGINS TO SEARCH, YOU HAVE TO WONDER...<br/><br/>Is it that the county is responsible for placing the person in jeopardy?<br/><br/>Because the county leveraged the young man into being a confidential informant based on a minor infraction?<br/><br/>Because when somehow exposed the boy disappeared? Informants slip up all the time - often ALCOHOL is involved.<br/><br/>Only to turn up 6 weeks later dead in the River?<br/><br/>Accidental death. BULLSHIT. He was NOT swimming after midnight in November in the river in Philadelphia. <br/><br/>And I can't recall anyone ever falling out of a bar in Manyunk into the river. Tumbling all that way???<br/><br/>Their extensive informant program is involved in just about every prosecution. Candidates are selected because of their relationship to lawyers and police - who know the abuse of power, corruption and destruction of the county officers.<br/><br/>EVERYTHING MONTGOMERY COUNTY IS INVOLVED IN IS ABOUT THE COVER UP. <br/><br/>Non-Disclosure under Rule 1.6.<br/><br/>Every lawyer in the county knows the corruption of the District Attorneys Office and the Judiciary.<br/>“a person who spends his/her professional life figuring how to [screw] others…”- Bruce Castor.<br/><br/><center><table width=80%><tr><td>When the county has you under surveillance - authorized by the Superior Court - and you mention to anyone on your phone that the informant confessed and told you about it. The informant disappears.<br/><br/>The County Drug Task Force uses their intrusion AND surveillance tools top undermine the target's life. Compels them to murder (Bradley Stone) and suicide. Disrupts their life with judicial corruption and INJUSTICE.<br/><br/>You won;t find justice when appealing to the Superior Court where they have ap[proved years of surveillance and terrorized tyour life - and their effort resulted in NO PROSECUTION. You did nothing wrong. Their embarassment must be concealed. And their emails must be concealed as well. INJUSTICE RESULTS - otherwise they are exposed. HIDE THE EMAIL! Even where they continued to involve a Supreme Court Justice.<br/><br/>Where they are caught, there is no exit without destruction. Because they must lie cheat and steal to maintain confidentiality.<br/><br/>Those who know are under constant threat. They violate the law, civil and human rights and have no respect for anyone. Montgomery County is all about the coverup.</td></tr></table></center><br/><br/>Imagine how peaceful life would be if the County was not so pre-occupied with concealing the corruption and damage they cause. The only ones profiting from their corruption and injustice are the lawyers. INJUSTICE IS A GOLDMINE to the membership of the American Bar Association. The ABA authored and promoted Rule 1.6 - that is no coincidence.Terancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8495349982447643424.post-50351125622853447662015-02-05T04:57:00.000-05:002015-02-19T16:11:24.406-05:00Every. Person. Matters. War on INJUSTICE.Excuse me. Um. I think I am lost. Do you enjoy destroying people? I just want to understand. I want to know what drives a person to do what you do. To ruin other people's lives... <br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Statue-poster.jpg"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Statue-poster-204x300.jpg" alt="Statue-poster" width="204" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-10468" /></a>... because you have taken everything from me. Abuse of Power under Color of Law... which lead me to THAT LAW which perverts justice and undermines the entire government.<br/><br/>You have manipulated a very strong team to assist you in your efforts which violate the Public Trust and is concealed. You have ripped the head off of Justice and shit down her throat.<br/><br/>You fail to understand. EVERY. PERSON. MATTERS. <em>There are more of us than there are of you.</em> <br/><br/>Rule 1.6 provides the ability to conceal the abuse of power under color of law. The unconstitutional nullity is NO LAW... and NO SECRET... anymore.<br/><br/>You are the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION. An organization which interferes and intervenes to cause injustice and prevent any escape. A membership which has intruded and intercepted at every level of the judiciary to perpetrate unconstitutional acts while concealed behind a judiciary held hostage. <em>There are more of us than there are of you.</em> <br/><br/>The actions of the ABA membership to prevent JUSTICE are exposed. Two secret orders from unidentified courts which silence and prevent Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane from the responsibilities and duties of her office will not stop an awareness of the corruption caused and concealed by RULE 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION of the Rules of Professional Conduct - a minimum ethical standard which lack any ethics - permitting non-disclosure in the furtherance of fraud or to prevent resolution. INJUSTICE endorsed by SILENCE. A Mandatory Silence. <br/><br/>Rule 1.6 is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. JUSTICE IS COMING.<br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/A1_hunter__with_banner_in_MLK_march_t750x550.jpg"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/A1_hunter__with_banner_in_MLK_march_t750x550.jpg" alt="A1_hunter__with_banner_in_MLK_march_t750x550" width="550" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-10701" /></a><br/><center><HR width=75%></center><br/><br/>"I’ve seen it happen numerous times and I marvel at how the “bully” doesn’t see it."<br/><br/>"a person who spends his/her professional life figuring how to [screw] others…”<br/><br/>"a seasoned veteran of investigations and multi-faceted prosecutions that take months, if not years, to build, and hundreds of hours to prepare)" - with a twisted and perverted sense of paranoia because their injustice has been excused.<br/><br/><em>EXPOSED.</em> "What is in doubt is how badly, and what the fallout will be."<br/><br/>"Career lawmen think strategically. They don’t go for the immediate gratification of a personal attack, instead preferring to set the board up just right and striking at the precise moment where the object of the attack cannot recover."<br/><br/>"I’ve witnessed a long line of politicians who have picked fights like this for short term personal or political benefit. I can’t recall any that have managed to avoid being hurt far more seriously for having done so."<br/><br/>"The moral: don’t pick a political fight against someone schooled in how to really hurt you."<br/><br/><h2><em>There are more of us than there are of you. </em></h2> <br/><br/><em>The weapon of injustice, Rule 1.6, is revealed. An unconstitutional, improper, manipulative fraud. Repugnant to the principles and beliefs upon which the United States was founded.</em><br/><br/><em>Every. Person. Matters.</em><br/><br/><br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/godisjust.jpg"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/godisjust.jpg" alt="godisjust" width="550" height="151" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9306" /></a><br/><br/><h2>Every. Person. Matters. JUSTICE IS COMING.<br/></h2><br/><br/><center><HR width=75%></center><br/><br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/2015/01/commissioner-bruce-castor-schooled-in-how-to-really-hurt-you-and-to-screw-others/" target="_blank">The Quotes come from a manifesto written by an apparently angry and frightened man upon learning his efforts to undermine an attorney general had a setback.</a> A prosecutor for 22 years, including two terms as District Attorney, who has served as President of the Pennsylvania District Attorneys Association, <a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/1901860_646326345414783_384204306_n.jpg"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/1901860_646326345414783_384204306_n.jpg" alt="1901860_646326345414783_384204306_n" width="155" height="155" class="alignright size-full wp-image-10261" /></a>Bruce Castor believes he has attained a sterling reputation for pursuing truth, justice, and accountability in public office. He is the only person who believes his lie.<br/><br/>Castor was Montgomery County District Attorney when <a href="http://www.work2bdone.com/live" target="_blank">A Terroristic Divorce</a> was initiated in 2007. It seems every oerson to whom I turned for help were the ones who were already working to destroy me - unable to tell the truth - unable to end my terror. Because of an unconstitutional law which prevented them from doing the right thing. EVER.Terancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8495349982447643424.post-50458814942993659972015-02-04T11:47:00.000-05:002015-02-19T16:11:24.383-05:00Regaining Possession: An application of Rule 1.6Under PA Law, there are two methods to address the issue of title and ownership of property.<br/>If you are in possession of the property, you file a QUIET TITLE.<br/>If you are not in possession of the property, you file an EJECTMENT.<br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/0904011043a.jpg"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/0904011043a-300x225.jpg" alt="0904011043a" width="200" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-4585" /></a><br/>Homeless since 2011, with patience and perseverance, I played their game. <em>Rule 1.6 secretly and silently affects everything.</em><br/><br/>The corruption of the court is it's own undoing.<br/><br/><br/>Ejectment filed in August 2013. <br/>PHYSICALLY THROWN OUT OF COURT <br/><br/>Ejectment filed again in October 2013. <br/><br/>March 2014. The Court dismissed ejectment because I was not in possession of the property. An error which can be addressed on appeal. <br/> - - the concealed issue is the exposure of their invalid deed, <br/> - - the fraudulent conveyance <br/> - - presenting the void and defective order issued by Judge Carluccio <br/> - - the invalid court order cannot permit/excuse a crime<br/> - - in the clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction, absolute judicial immunity is not available and exposes the entire bench, 20 judges, 8 years of litigation, a complete farce, liability for damages and releif.<br/> - - improper use of the invalid order by county offices.<br/><br/><center><table width=80%><tr><td>THE LOGIC FAILURE: THE COURT CANNOT ATTAIN RETROACTIVE JURISDICTION FOR THEIR INVALID ORDER. Ignoring only exacerbates everyone involved while preventing any resolution. FOREVER.<br/> <br/>MY MOTIVATION: The victim loses the protection of the rule of law and all constitutional rights without resolution. FOREVER.<br/><br/>JUDGE'S MOTIVATION: Liability. Exposure of corruption and injustice and terror. Injustice. The egregious violation of the public trust.</em></td></tr></table></center><br/><br/>December 2014. The Superior Court affirms the lower court.<br/> - - adding chaos: there is no evidence of any judge being involved in their 'decision'.<br/> - - The staff lawyers... is it Interference or Intervention?<br/>a) Follow the law, the lower court is exposed.<br/>b) Ignore the law, the judges are acting without immunity.<br/>c) Commit Fraud, legal staff intercepts and 'plays judge'.<br/><br/><h2>c) Commit Fraud</h2><br/>FRAUD - the lack of accountability and responsibility concealed by unsigned documents, failure to hold proceedings, and documents which violate EVERY judicial canon. <br/>- Fraud in the furtherance of fraud under Rule 1.6 <br/>- UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTIONS and a failure to explain pursuant to Rule 1.6 proves Rule 1.6 is preventing constitutional rights. <strong><em>GOTCHA!!! </em></strong><br/><br/>Recognizing this interference with the administration of justice, criminal complaints have been filed... with county, state and federal law enforcement... and filed with the court.<br/><br/><h2>Escalate? NO.</h2><br/>The Supreme Court of PA can select which cases it reviews. Escalation would only delay gaining possession, the courts have acted to delay long enough. The refusal of jurisdiction is an acknowledgement of the corruption, lawlessness and injustice. <br/>There is no point in exposing the injustice to the Supreme Court forcing the sacrifice of their integrity to conceal the corruption of the lower courts.<br/>The Supreme Court will follow Rule 1.6 because the Supreme Court enacted it. (Unconstitutionally)<br/><br/>Supreme Court review of the dismissal would only return the matter to the lower court for hearings and a further delay. <br/><br/>Undisclosed, Rule 1.6 is actively corrupting every decision. <br/><br/>THE COURTS HAVE INDICATED THAT THEY DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION AND CANNOT BE INVOLVED... AND AFFIRMED IT... TWICE. Judiciary is out. Ejectment fail. Rule 1.6 exposed.<br/><br/>Judicial branch has indicated a lack of jurisdiction. Their affirmed lack of jurisdiction prevents them from action, and intervention as I retake possession of my home. As I have legal title to the property, an Ejectment cannot be filed against me by a non-owner.<br/><br/><h2>Let's go home!</h2><br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/2015/02/enforcement-request-sheriff-bono-and-governor-wolf/" title="Enforcement Request: Sheriff Bono and Governor Wolf" target="_blank">Where required to Quiet Title, I have requested the assistance of the Governor, Attorney General and the Sheriff to regain possession of my home.</a> Because, the people who are trespassing there sure are not gonna do it.<br/><br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/stick-me-with-a-fork-im-done-tracy-glantz.jpg"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/stick-me-with-a-fork-im-done-tracy-glantz-239x300.jpg" alt="stick-me-with-a-fork-im-done-tracy-glantz" width="200" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-9203" /></a><strong>"THE RULE 1.6 THING"</strong><br/>The law is clear. <br/>The judges are wrong in indicating their lack of jurisdiction, <br/>BUT... it isn't what they are saying that causes their lack of jurisdiction. <br/>It is what they are NOT saying. <br/><br/>Pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality, they may not disclose actions which will adversely affect the integrity of the court. If they indicate Rule 1.6 is the basis for their improper decision, they confirm the unconstitutional aspect of Rule 1.6 preventing the rule of law and constitutional rights.<br/><br/>The courts do not have jurisdiction because Rule 1.6 MANDATES non-disclosure and confidentiality where exposure adversely affects the integrity of the judiciary. <br/><br/>Rule 1.6 prevents the court from revealing that their lack of jurisdiction is necessitated by their corruption to conceal their corruption.<br/><br/>Thankfully, the Judiciary has removed themselves from the issue of possession. A full year lost... more litigation to come. But, taking back the house is likely to attract news media attention and expose Rule 1.6... I'm not restricted by unconstitutional law, nor improper court orders pending appeal, nor grand jury secrecy... and I've got a secret that's been called the worst kept secret in Pennsylvania. Your Welcome, PA. Justice is Coming.<br/><br/><HR><br/><br/>Any application of Rule 1.6 demonstrates it is unconstitutional. <br/>Disclosure is irrelevant where non-disclosure is evident. <em>If it's not there... there's your proof.</em><br/><br/>Their improper decision is based on an unconstitutional law which is not indicated because THE LAW mandates non-disclosure, and if revealed it would expose that THE LAW is unconstitutional. <br/><br/>Rule 1.6 is concealing the corruption it causes and the improper decisions it requires without any indication that it is being applied pursuant to itself... because Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional.<br/><br/>An unconstitutional law is no law. A nullity. Without any effect. As if it never existed. ... and can not be the basis or justification for action or inaction.<br/><br/><center>So a Law which does not exist, and can never have existed, <br/>is concealing the crimes and unconstitutional actions and judicial corruption<br/>which it has caused and permitted<br/>while concealed and mandated to be held confidential.<br/>AND... THAT LAW can't be removed for the same reasons.</center><br/><br/>The Legislative branch did not write the law. <br/>Non-disclosure is mandated of the lawyers in the Legislature. DO NOT ASK JUDICIARY COMMITTEE TO REVIEW. DUH!<br/><br/>The Executive Branch did not sign the law. <br/>Where Gov Corbett was a lawyer non-disclosure is mandated.<br/>Where Gov Wolf is NOT a lawyer, those he would consult are lawyers and non-disclosure is mandated.<br/>Where the Attorney General is a lawyer, non-disclosure is mandated.<br/><br/>BUT, an unconstitutional law is no law. There is no mandate for non-disclosure by lawyers... <em>where they recognize and understand the unconstitutionality of the 'law'.</em><br/><br/>When Attorney General Kathleen Kane recognized and understood the Unconstitutional effect of Rule 1.6, she was permitted to address it, and actually mandated by the Rules of Professional Conduct to address the issue.<br/><center><h2>THE SUDDEN PUBLIC SILENCE OF KATHLEEN KANE</h2></center><br/><br/><h2>WAIT!!!</h2> Two secret court orders from unidentified courts require the attorney general to neglect the responsibilities of her office and expose her to personal liability. SILENCE!<br/><br/>The court orders must be followed while their impropriety is appealed. SILENCE!<br/><br/><h2>WAIT WAIT!!!</h2> A grand jury calls the attorney general to testify. Grand Jury secrecy requires the silence of the attorney general. SILENCE!<br/><br/><h2>HOLD ON!!!</h2> Lawyers and Prosecutors and District Attorneys commence a barrage of disinformation to which the 'silenced' attorney general may not respond. The same people who participated in and/or failed to address the corruption since 2007. From Montgomery County and the Attorney General's office - under Tom Corbett and Linda Kelly all those requests by phone, letter and <strong>EMAIL</strong> for HELP were ignored. Lots of email.<br/><br/><h2>WAIT WAIT WAIT!!!</h2> The Montgomery County Grand Jury, run by Judge Carluccio's Husband, and the Judge who jailed Drexler, which has not indicated what they are investigating. As it could be any topic - this requires the silence of Kathleen Kane with regard to EVERYTHING and ANYTHING to do with Terance Healy and Rule 1.6. <br/><br/>The unpublished presentment is 'leaked', but nothing can be confirmed or discussed. Everything is speculation which is fully extrapolated by lawyers who know the attorney general is 'silenced'. Clearly, these LAWYERS know and understand how to manipulate under Rule 1.6. <a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/2015/01/commissioner-bruce-castor-schooled-in-how-to-really-hurt-you-and-to-screw-others/" target="_blank">Montgomery County Commissioner Bruce Castor, explained it concisely:<br/><br/><center><em>"Career lawmen think strategically. They don’t go for the immediate gratification <br/>of a personal attack, instead preferring to set the board up just right and <br/>striking at the precise moment where the object of the attack cannot recover."<br/><br/>“you don’t go to war with a person who spends his/her professional life figuring how to [screw] others…”</em></center></a><br/><br/>In 2007, Bruce Castor was Montgomery County District Attorney while unprosecuted terroristic technological intrusions into my life and family were reported and fully documented. Castor ignored and prevented federal authorities from investigating.<br/><br/>Under Rule 1.6, they may commit fraud and actions in the furtherance of fraud to prevent disclosure and resolution of prior frauds while mandated to non-disclosure and confidentiality. AND THEY DO.<br/><br/><h2>Separation of Powers???</h2><br/>Unconstitutional law concealed by improper SECRET court orders which prevent the Executive Branch (Attorney General) from enforcing the laws of the Legislative Branch. <a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/images.jpg"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/images-300x168.jpg" alt="images" width="150" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-10661" /></a><br/><br/>SECRET COURT ORDERS FROM UNIDENTIFIED COURTS. Yes, looks like... quacks like... that duck is Rule 1.6.<br/><br/>The Judicial Branch has usurped the full power of the government but cannot reveal how they did it.<br/><br/>The Executive and Legislative branches cannot address THE LAW which they have not written.<br/><br/>The Judicial Branch enacted it without authority... but they can't disclose that either.<br/><br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/a-monolithic-and-ruthless-conspiracy.jpg"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/a-monolithic-and-ruthless-conspiracy.jpg" alt="a-monolithic-and-ruthless-conspiracy" width="500" height="243" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7706" /></a><br/><br/><h2>The American Bar Association</h2><br/>The One Law which Overthrew the Government... was written by the American Bar Association while holding the Judicial Branch hostage while leveraging decisions and perpetuating injustice in the best interest of their membership. Injustice is a goldmine.<br/><br/><br/>The Pennsylvania Legislature must act to suspend the unconstitutional law so that honest and ethical lawyers who have not been tainted by corruption can lawfully address the unconstitutional law improperly enacted by the Judiciary. <br/><br/>Only the Pennsylvania Legislature has the constitutional authority to suspend laws. <br/><br/>Only the non-lawyers in the Legislature can act without violating the law until it is not law.<br/><br/>Having to follow an unconstitutional law, until it is declared unconstitutional (nullity, blah blah) FAIL! RULE 1.6 REQUIRES NON-DISCLOSURE AND CONFIDENTIALITY BY LAWYERS AND LEGAL PROFESSIONALS - a deliberate built-in defense to conceal it's unconstitutionality and require participation in injustice.<br/><br/><ul><br/>Governor Wolf, <br/><br/>Order the Legislature to assemble for a presentation of Rule 1.6 - an improperly enacted unconstitutional law which corrupts the judiciary and causes injustice while defying exposure through it's own mandatory confidentiality - a self-defense which prevents correction, suspension or edit.<br/><br/>Senators and Representatives who are lawyers will sit silently. Rule 1.6 mandates their silence.<br/><br/>Suspend Rule 1.6, directly and where included by reference within any other law.<br/><br/>Watch the results... Rule of Law. Constitution. US Constitution. Justice.<br/><br/>Every. Person. Matters.<br/><br/>Respectfully,<br/><br/>Terance</ul><br/><br/><center><table width=80%><tr><td><br/>LOGIC FAILURE: THE COURT CANNOT ATTAIN JURISDICTION FOR THEIR INVALID ORDERS.<br/>Ignoring only exacerbates everyone involved while preventing any resolution. FOREVER.<br/> <br/>The victim loses the protection of the rule of law and all constitutional rights without resolution. FOREVER. <br/><br/>The injustice can be played by anyone... FOREVER. (Concealed by Rule 1.6) <br/><br/>There is no allowance for retroactive jurisdiction. <em>The order will always be invalid.</em><br/><br/>Rule 1.6 prevents exposure and resolution while denying a person of their rights and any protection of the law. <em>Rule 1.6 will always be unconstitutional.</em></td></tr></table><br/></center>Terancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8495349982447643424.post-56215157740392553612015-02-03T06:03:00.000-05:002015-02-19T16:11:24.361-05:00Enforcement Request: Sheriff Bono and Governor WolfFebruary 3, 2015<br/><br/>Governor Wolf<br/>OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR<br/>225 Capitol Bldg<br/>501 North 3rd Street<br/>Harrisburg , PA 17120<br/><br/>Kathleen Kane<br/>Office of the Attorney General<br/>11 N 3rd St<br/>16th Floor, Strawberry Square<br/>Harrisburg , PA 17101<br/><br/>Sheriff Russell J. Bono<br/>Montgomery County Court House<br/>First Floor<br/>P.O. Box 311<br/>Norristown, PA 19404<br/><br/><br/>Under Pennsylvania law, a fraudulent conveyance has occurred with regard to my property at 110 Banbury Avenue, North Wales, PA. I ask your assistance in regaining possession of the property where the judiciary has indicated a lack of jurisdiction to address, resolve or rectify the matter.<br/><br/>Documents recorded with the Montgomery County Recorder of Deeds demonstrate the deficiencies and frauds which occurred during the criminal transaction. Additional documents demonstrating the fraud have been filed with the Prothonotary.<br/><br/>Where a property owner is resident on the property, an Action to Quiet Title would permit the court to address the fraudulent conveyance of the property and rectify/resolve/remove the improperly recorded documents.<br/><br/>Where a property owner is not resident on the property, an Action in Ejectment is required to remove the trespassers from the residence and rectify/resolve/remove the improperly recorded documents.<br/><br/>The Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas has indicated a lack of jurisdiction and improperly dismissed an Action in Ejectment. On Appeal, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania has purportedly affirmed the lower courts decision <br/>without any review of facts; and<br/>without indication or support according to an applicable rule of law; and <br/>without evidence of any judicial review of the issues presented on appeal; and<br/>without any proceedings or hearings on the matter; and<br/>while failing to address the issue of the appeal; and <br/>neglecting every motion properly prepared and filed with the appellate court; and<br/>failing to explain and produce ex parte communications/documents/orders and subsequent manipulation and concealment in the court docket.<br/><br/>The litigation causes lawyers representing the Defendants to be subject to sanctions where they have failed to present any defense; and neglected to offer evidence of proper ownership; and have no justification in law. Their actions have served to delay the resolution of the matter, denying the plaintiff of his home and property while demonstrating a lack of judicial independence and a corruption which adversely affects the integrity of every judge and every court.<br/><br/>The challenge of an unconstitutional law was indicated with evidence demonstrated by actions in the lower court. Additionally, The interception and interference by the legal staff of the Superior Court violate Pennsylvania law, federal law and the US Constitution.<br/><br/>A complaint of the unconstitutional and criminal actions of the court staff has been filed with <br/>United States Attorney Zane Memeger, as the offenses occurred within the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.<br/>Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane, as the offenses occurred within Pennsylvania and as required by the Rules of Appellate Procedure the attorney general must be notified where an appeal will challenge the constitutionality of a law. <br/>Philadelphia District Attorney Seth Williams, as the offenses occurred within the city and county of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.<br/>Bucks County District Attorney David Heckler, as I am a resident of Bucks County, PA.<br/>The United States Postal Inspectors, Philadelphia, as the forged and fraudulent documents attributed to the judiciary were delivered through the use of the US Postal Service.<br/>The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, as the actions violate the Rules of Professional Conduct.<br/><br/>Attorney General Kathleen Kane has been ordered to SILENCE by two secret court orders from two unidentified courts. Where these orders additionally prevent investigation and require an improper negligence for the functions and responsibilities of the Attorney General, Kathleen Kane's failure might be 'explained'. But, what of the others who have neglected their law enforcement responsibilities and participation in a conspiracy to interfere with civil rights (42 USC § 1985, 18 U.S.C. § 241) under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242).<br/><br/>Additionally, the following have been notified of the unconstitutional Pennsylvania law which has been improperly enacted by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania where their authority requires laws 'consistent with [the Pennsylvania] Constitution and neither abridge, enlarge nor modify the substantive rights of any litigant.' PA Constitution Article V Section 10(c)<br/>- Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett<br/>- The Senators and Representatives of the Pennsylvania Legislature <br/>- The elected Sheriffs of Pennsylvania<br/>- The Senators and Representatives of the US Congress<br/>- President Barack Obama<br/>- Pennsylvania Supreme Court Chief Justice Ron Castille <br/><br/>A Constitutional Challenge had been filed in federal district court and served upon the state attorney general in every state and territory, with notice to every state governor, as the same unconstitutional law has been enacted in every state and affects constitutionally protected rights of litigants while denying any protection of the law.<br/><br/>Improperly dismissed after default by every state attorney general, the United States Marshall service was notified along with the US Department of Justice and US Attorney General Eric Holder. An appeal to the Third Circuit Court affirmed the district court's dismissal while unsubstantiated by any dismissal doctrine and neglecting the facts associated with the matter.<br/><br/><strong>Absent any available recourse within the judicial branch to address the theft by fraudulent conveyance of my property;<br/>Having identified and demonstrated the unconstitutional collateral affect of the Rule 1.6 mandated non-disclosure and confidentiality by every legal professional;<br/>With the resulting participation by the above-named persons, and all lawyers and legal professionals, in a conspiracy which denies constitutional rights, obstructing justice and denying the rule of law while neglecting any effort to address, remove or suspend the unconstitutional law;<br/>I seek your assistance to regain possession of the residence which will permit me to file an Action to Quiet Title to resolve and rectify the fraudulent documents filed with the Montgomery County Recorder of Deeds.</strong><br/><br/>Respectfully.<br/><br/>Terance Healy<br/><br/><br/>cc: <br/>Governor Wolf<br/>Pennsylvania Legislature<br/>Pennsylvania Supreme Court<br/>Internet (www.work2bdone.com/live)<br/>Media<br/><br/><br/>Healy v Miller 2013-29976<br/>Healy v Miller 900 EDA 2014<br/><br/>Attachments:<br/>Notice Complaint of Unconstitutional Actions<br/>Letter: Zane Memeger<br/>Letter: Seth Williams<br/>Letter: Kathleen Kane<br/>Letter: David Heckler<br/>Complaint: US Postal Inspectors<br/>Overview of the Constitutional Challenge to Rule 1.6Terancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8495349982447643424.post-44544833374999010272015-02-02T10:53:00.000-05:002015-02-19T16:11:24.331-05:00Unconstitutional Nullity: Peek-a-boo... Justice is ComingFreedom is IMPORTANT. Constitutional rights are IMPORTANT.<br/><br/>If your solution violates either My Freedom or the US Constitution, then YOU have some more work to do. <br/><br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Fractured-trust.jpg"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Fractured-trust-300x168.jpg" alt="Fractured-trust" width="200" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-10617" /></a>Freedoms and Rights can coexist. <br/><br/>Once permitted to infringe upon each other, it is a slippery slope. <br/><em>(OY! I hate cliche's but no better choice there.)</em><br/><br/>I am grateful for the effort by the founders of the US, because in today's 140 char or less environment they would never have been allowed to think in a broad sense which permits freedom and rights to co-exist.<br/><br/>Their archived papers and documents explained the basis for their decisions, and the aspects which they wrestled with to come to the decision. They exerted considerably more thought while founding the American Government than people expect. It was not haphazard. Decisions were not reached by exhausting the person who did not agree. Only one known and argued issue seems to have been conceded while it left the government at risk.<br/><br/>One issue which was a necessity left a loophole in the separation of powers. They did foresee the problem, but did not imagine that it would ever occur. They got it wrong. Very wrong.<br/><br/>By permitting the Judicial branch to self-police, the administration of justice, and the independence of the judiciary and the reasons which necessitated absolute judicial immunity all pivoted on one point of failure - THE PUBLIC TRUST. <br/><br/>The Public Trust in the judiciary is mandated by law. Respect towards the judicial branch is mandated by law. <br/><br/>The courts were open rooms in the centers of towns. Justice was transparent and open to the public. The public could witness proceedings. When necessary, where the trust placed in the judiciary was violated, the public would remove a judge from office. Occasionally by hanging. Justice was swift. Violations of the Public Trust could not be permitted to continue and erode the entire system of justice and government.. <br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/10170843_664540263581177_6275542718719060369_n.jpg"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/10170843_664540263581177_6275542718719060369_n.jpg" alt="10170843_664540263581177_6275542718719060369_n" width="550" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-10613" /></a><br/>It was this type of violation of the public trust which endorsed and enabled apartheid to persist in South Africa. Their judiciary jailed the outspoken without regard for their own injustice. <br/><br/>When South Africa wrote their new Constitution in the 90's, they made certain that the judicial branch was accountable to the people and the Executive and Legislative branches of government, and not just to the judicial branch. They recognized the problem which existed in the US, once corrupted the judiciary find justice in permitting injustice to continue. <br/><br/><br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/3556-GOVTRANSPARENCYCARTOON.jpg"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/3556-GOVTRANSPARENCYCARTOON-300x238.jpg" alt="3556-GOVTRANSPARENCYCARTOON" width="250" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-10611" /></a>THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT <br/><em>(because trust, honor and respect is mandated by law)</em><br/><br/>The judiciary did not recognize Rule 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION for the pervasive corruption it would permit, cause, enable and conceal. <br/><br/>Once under the control of Rule 1.6, with the leverage of exposing the violation of the public trust concealed by the judiciary, the American Bar Association had effectively usurped the authority and independence of the judiciary. The ABA then manipulated the authority of the courts over lawyers and legal professionals, even in other branches of government. Where Rule 1.6 expanded to affect federal lawyers, Rule 1.6 undermined the jurisdiction and authority of the Federal Government to act to address corruption within the state. Rule 1.6 required active participation in the conspiracy and the injustice. <br/><br/>The McDade Murtha Amendment which prevents the exposure of Rule 1.6 by government lawyers was enacted against the objections of several US Attorneys General, and DOJ officials. It would have been so simple had they only informed the Congress of the central issue. Applying the ethical standard enacted within the state to all government lawyers would cause considerable damage to the government.<br/><br/>The Rules of Professional Conduct lacked ethics, permitted fraud and the efforts to conceal fraud and prevent resolution. The US Congress never checked to see if the state ethics laws were ethical. Pennsylvania describes the Rules as a minimal ethical standard. Minimal is none. Points for not lying about the law which would require their silence about the corruption it would cause.<br/><br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/got-ethics2.jpg"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/got-ethics2-300x200.jpg" alt="Got ethics ?" width="200" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-10609" /></a>Did the state law, Rule 1.6 prevent exposing that state ethics laws lacked ethics? even where the country was about to mandate all government attorneys to follow the 'Rules' within the respective state where they were investigating and working? even where it denied constitutionally protected rights?<br/><br/>Apparently, the lawyers who foreclosed upon over 48 million homes using fraudulent and forged robo-signed documents were confident that their corruption of the authority of the judiciary had been successful. <br/><br/>The big injustices, the little injustices all combine to create a sense of national urgency. Injustice is occurring across the country. The US Constitution is being ignored. One law enacted in every state affects every case secretly, confidentially. Promotion to law was begun in 1984, generations of lawyers find this 'acceptable' because they were mandated to conceal the problem if they discovered it. Trained to perceive Rule 1.6 as attorney-client privilege, and neglecting the affect on the law, justice and the judiciary.... even while it undermined and usurped the authority of the other branches of government.<br/><br/><h2>When recognized by PA Attorney General Kathleen Kane, an unconstitutional law would not be effective to silence her, The courts issues several secret court orders. AG Kane is silenced while those corrupt orders are under appeal.... and while it undermines the constitutional rights of every American.</h2><br/><br/>The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 removes an unconstitutional law and restores justice to the entire country. Discovered by victims of injustice with standing to address the unconstitutional effect of the 'law'. Without the assistance, or cooperation, of any legal professional or member of the American Bar Association and affiliated organizations formed in every jurisdiction at every level of state and federal courts. <br/><br/>Hindered from the effort by legal professionals within the state and federal government mandated to follow the unconstitutional law, the government lawyers knew better and cannot be excused from damages and repartations for their participation in the denial of the rule of law and prevention of rights secures by the US Constitution.<br/><br/><h2>Did those secret court orders require Kathleen Kane to file for divorce in an attempt to secure her personal assets? Is that why those lawyers are representing 'the person' Kathleen Kane (and not the Office of the Attorneyh General)?<br/></h2><br/><br/>The laws work when not prevented by an unconstitutional requirement to conceal injustice in every state and federally.<br/><br/>If your solution violates either My Freedom or the US Constitution, then you have some more work to do. <br/><br/>If their defense is that they were following the law, then they need to recall that an unconstitutional law is no law, a nullity, as if it never existed. It can no longer be obstructed by an unconstitutional law mandating non-disclosure and confidentiality and participation in a conspiracy to deny constitutional rights. <br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/why-kids-think-they-are-invisible-when-playing-peek-a-boo.jpg"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/why-kids-think-they-are-invisible-when-playing-peek-a-boo-300x225.jpg" alt="why-kids-think-they-are-invisible-when-playing-peek-a-boo" width="300" height="225" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-10601" /></a><br/><br/>A nullity cannot conceal a nullity. <br/><br/>A nullity cannot justify or excuse a nullity.<br/><br/>PEEK-a-Boo... JUSTICE IS COMING.<br/><br/>Peek-a-boo Pennsylvania!<br/><br/>Governor Wolf and the Legislature can act now, or after a federal lawsuit is filed against them? <br/><br/>Those who know better ought to know better than to continue their participation in a conspiracy to deny the constitutional rights of every American in every state. EVERY PERSON MATTERS.<br/><br/>Pwennsylvania, whatcha gonna do?Terancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8495349982447643424.post-88327434700699921292015-01-31T16:45:00.000-05:002015-02-19T16:11:24.151-05:00Mail FraudMAIL FRAUD AND WIRE FRAUD<br/><br/><br/>Prosecution Policy Relating to Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud<br/><br/>Prosecutions of fraud ordinarily should not be undertaken if the scheme employed consists of some isolated transactions between individuals, involving minor loss to the victims, in which case the parties should be left to settle their differences by civil or criminal litigation in the state courts. Serious consideration, however, should be given to the prosecution of any scheme which in its nature is directed to defrauding a class of persons, or the general public, with a substantial pattern of conduct.<br/>See also USAM 9-85.210 (requires prior consultation with the Public Integrity Section to use the mail or wire fraud statutes in the prosecution of election fraud cases).<br/><br/>Further guidance and legal analysis of issues surrounding the investigation and prosecution of frauds involving use of the mail or wire, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1341 and 1343 can be found in the Criminal Resource Manual:<br/><br/><br/>Investigative Authority<br/><br/>Primary investigative jurisdiction of possible violations of the mail and wire fraud statutes is vested in the Federal Bureau of Investigation. In some cases, complaints involving securities may be investigated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, the Postal Inspection Service of the United States Postal Service may initiate mail or wire fraud investigations. In both situations, the investigations are usually continued by the agency initiating the investigation. Reports of investigation are disseminated directly to the appropriate United States Attorney.<br/><br/><br/>18 U.S.C. Section 1341—Elements of Mail Fraud<br/><br/>"There are two elements in mail fraud: (1) having devised or intending to devise a scheme to defraud (or to perform specified fraudulent acts), and (2) use of the mail for the purpose of executing, or attempting to execute, the scheme (or specified fraudulent acts)." Schmuck v. United States, 489 U.S. 705, 721 n. 10 (1989); see also Pereira v. United States, 347 U.S. 1, 8 (1954) ("The elements of the offense of mail fraud under . . . § 1341 are (1) a scheme to defraud, and (2) the mailing of a letter, etc., for the purpose of executing the scheme."); Laura A. Eilers & Harvey B. Silikovitz, Mail and Wire Fraud, 31 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 703, 704 (1994) (cases cited).<br/><br/><br/>The Scheme and Artifice to Defraud<br/><br/>The wire fraud statute was patterned after the mail fraud statutes. United States v. Lemon, 941 F.2d 309, 316 (5th Cir. 1991); United States v. Castillo, 829 F.2d 1194, 1198 (1st Cir. 1987). Thus, the same principles apply in defining "scheme to defraud" for mail and wire fraud prosecutions. See Carpenter v. United States, 484 U.S. 19, 25 n. 6 (1987) ("The mail and wire fraud statutes share the same language in relevant part, and accordingly we apply the same analysis to both sets of offenses here."); United States v. Lemire, 720 F.2d 1327, 1334-35 n. 6 (D.C. Cir. 1983) ("The requisite elements of 'scheme to defraud' under the wire fraud statute [§ 1343] and the mail fraud statute [§ 1341], are identical. Thus, cases construing mail fraud apply to the wire fraud statute as well."), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 (1984).<br/><br/>The mail fraud and wire fraud statutes do not define the terms "scheme" or "artifice" and the courts have traditionally been reluctant to offer definitions of either term except in the broadest and most general terms. Lemire, 720 F.2d at 1335 ("Congress did not define 'scheme or artifice to defraud' when it first coined that phrase, nor has it since. Instead that expression has taken on its present meaning from 111 years of case law.").<br/><br/>The fraudulent aspect of the scheme to defraud is to be measured by nontechnical standards and is not restricted by any common-law definition of false pretenses. "[T]he words 'to defraud' in the mail fraud statute have the 'common understanding' of '"wrongdoing one in his property rights by dishonest methods or schemes," and "usually signify the deprivation of something of value by trick, chicane, or overreaching."'" Carpenter, 484 U.S. at 27 (quoting McNally v. United States, 483 U.S. 350, 358 (1987) (quoting Hammerschmidt v. United States, 265 U.S. 182, 188 (1924))). "The concept of 'fraud' includes the act of embezzlement, which is '"the fraudulent appropriation to one's own use of the money or goods entrusted to one's own care by another."'" Id. (quoting Grin v. Shine, 187 U.S. 181, 189 (1902)).<br/><br/><br/>No Loss or Gullible Victims<br/><br/>"It is the scheme to defraud and not actual fraud that is required." United States v. Reid, 533 F.2d 1255, 1264 (D.C. Cir. 1976). <br/><br/>"No particular type of victim is required . . . nor need the scheme have succeeded." United States v. Coachman, 727 F.2d 1293, 1302-03 n. 43 (D.C. Cir. 1984). <br/><br/>No actual loss to the victims is required. See United States v. Pollack, 534 F.2d 964, 971 (D.C. Cir.) <br/><br/>"The fraud statutes speak alternatively of devising or intending to devise a scheme to defraud and do not require that the deception bear fruit for the wrongdoer or cause injury to the intended victim as a prerequisite to successful prosecution. [S]uccess of the scheme and loss by a defrauded person are not essential elements of the crime under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343 . . . .", cert. denied, 429 U.S. 924 (1976); see also United States v. Jordan, 626 F.2d 928, 931 (D.C. Cir. 1980) <br/><br/>"The amount of money realized as a result of the scheme is not an essential element of mail fraud. It was not even necessary to prove that the scheme succeeded."<br/><br/>For a discussion of fraud loss computation in sentencing see Guidelines Sentencing (Federal Judicial Center, 1997), Section II.D.2. Offense Involving Fraud and Deceit.<br/><br/>"[I]t makes no difference whether the persons the scheme is intended to defraud are gullible or skeptical, dull or bright . . . . " United States v. Maxwell, 920 F.2d 1028, 1036 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (quoting United States v. Brien, 617 F.2d 299, 311 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 919 (1980)). <br/><br/>"[T]he monumental credulity of the victim is no shield for the accused . . ." Id. (quoting Deaver v. United States, 155 F.2d 740, 744-45 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 329 U.S. 766 (1946)); cf. Pollack, 534 F.2d at 971 (To hold that actual loss to victim is required "would lead to the illogical result that the legality of a defendant's conduct would depend on his fortuitous choice of a gullible victim.") (quoted in Maxwell, 920 F.2d at 1036).<br/><br/><br/>Proof of Scheme and Artifice to Defraud<br/><br/>To sustain a conviction the government must prove the existence of a scheme; it is not required, however, to prove all details or all instances of allegedly illicit conduct. See, e.g., United States v. Stull, 743 F.2d 439, 442 n. 2 (6th Cir. 1984) ("It is well established that proof of every allegation is not required in order to convict; the government need only prove that the scheme to defraud existed."), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1062 (1985); United States v. Halbert, 640 F.2d 1000, 1008 (9th Cir. 1981) ("[T]he Government need not prove every misrepresentation charged conjunctively in the indictment."); United States v. Jordan, 626 F.2d 928, 930 (D.C. Cir. 1980) ("The Government is not required to prove the details of a scheme; it is, however, required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt . . . that the defendant . . . willfully and knowingly devised a scheme or artifice to defraud . . . .") (quoting with approval the trial court's instruction on § 1341); United States v. Amrep Corp., 560 F.2d 539, 546 (2d Cir. 1977) <br/><br/>("A scheme to defraud may consist of numerous elements, no particular one of which need be proved if there is sufficient overall proof that the scheme exists."), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1015 (1978); Anderson v. United States, 369 F.2d 11, 15 (8th Cir. 1966) (all instances of illicit conduct need not be proved to sustain a conviction), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 976 (1967).<br/><br/>"All that is required is that [the defendant has] knowingly and willingly participated in the scheme; she need not have performed every key act herself." United States v. Maxwell, 920 F.2d 1028, 1036 (D.C. Cir. 1990). The "evidence need only show that defendant was a 'knowing and active participant' in scheme to defraud and that scheme involved interstate wire communications." Id. (quoting United States v. Wiehoff, 748 F.2d 1158, 1161 (7th Cir. 1984)).<br/><br/><br/>McNally and Intangible Rights<br/><br/>In McNally v. United States, 483 U.S. 350 (1987), the Supreme Court held that the mail fraud statute does not reach "schemes to defraud citizens of their intangible rights to honest and impartial government" . . . and that the statute is "limited in scope to the protection of property rights." See Carpenter v. United States, 484 U.S. 19, 25 (1987) (quoting McNally and extending it to wire fraud statute); see also Evans v. United States, 504 U.S. 255, 292 (1992) ("[I]n McNally . . . we rejected the Government's contention that the federal mail fraud statute . . . protected the citizenry's 'intangible right' to good government . . . . ") (Thomas, J., dissenting).<br/><br/>In response to McNally, Congress passed Section 1346 of Title 18, United States Code, which provides that "For the purposes of this Chapter, the term 'scheme or artifice to defraud' includes a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services."<br/><br/>Section 1346, which became effective November 18, 1988, seemed to resolve the intangible rights issue. See Madeoy, 912 F.2d 1486, 1492 (D.C. Cir. 1990) ("McNally has been overruled by legislation."), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1105 and 498 U.S. 1110 (1991); cf. United States v. Bush, 888 F.2d 1145, 1145-46 (7th Cir. 1989) (ex post facto concerns bar the application of section 1346 to pre-1988 conduct). In United States v. Brumley, 79 F.3d 1430, 1440 (5th Cir. 1996), petition for rehearing en banc pending, however, the court concluded that the wording of § 1346, "simply does not effect a change in the portion of the McNally opinion which held that the mail fraud statute does not reach 'schemes to defraud citizens of their intangible rights to honest and impartial government.'"<br/><br/><br/>Tangible Versus Intangible Property Rights<br/><br/>In Carpenter, 484 U.S. 19, 25 (1987), the Court confirmed that "McNally did not limit the scope of § 1341 to tangible as distinguished from intangible property rights." The Court held that the intangible nature of "confidential business information" does not make it any less "property" protected by the mail and wire fraud statutes. Id. Carpenter accordingly distinguished intangible property rights, which were still protected by the mail and wire fraud statutes, and intangible non-property rights, which were not protected. Cf. United States v. Lemire, 720 F.2d 1327, 1336 (D.C. Cir. 1983) ("[A]lthough the scheme to defraud must threaten some cognizable harm to its target, that harm need not be a deprivation of tangible property or money; criminal fraud encompasses schemes to defraud persons of significant intangibles as well."), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 (1984).<br/><br/>QUERY: Whether interests such as contract rights, licenses, permits, trade secrets, franchises, government grants, goodwill, market share, etc., are intangible or tangible property rights that can be the subject of a mail or wire fraud violation. See, e.g., Carpenter, 484 U.S. at 25 (suggesting that contractual right to honest and faithful services is too ethereal in itself to fall within the protection of the mail fraud statute); United States v. DeFries, 43 F.3d 707, 709-11 (D.C. Cir. 1995) (union ballots are tangible property); United States v. Henry, 29 F.3d 112, 114-15 (3d Cir. 1994) (fair bidding opportunity is not a property right); United States v. F.J. Vollmer & Co., 1 F.3d 1511, 1521 (7th Cir. 1993) ("It is well established that the government's regulatory interests are not protected by the mail fraud statute.") (citing cases concerning licenses and permits), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 688 (1994); United States v. Loney, 959 F.2d 1332, 1336 (5th Cir. 1992) (flight award coupons are property); United States v. Madeoy, 912 F.2d 1486, 1492 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (a FHA insurance commitment, by which the Government promises to pay the lender if the borrower defaults on the loan, is a "property interest," not an "intangible right" because it involves the Government's "control over how its money [is] spent."), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1105 and 498 U.S. 1110 (1991). The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia's decision in DeFries provides a brief survey of cases finding property interests in permits, city liquor licenses, medical licenses and other items. See generally, 43 F.3d at 709-10 and n. 2; see also Laura A. Eilers & Harvey B. Silikovitz, Mail and Wire Fraud, 31 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 703, 706-11 (1994) (discussing "traditional frauds" and "frauds involving intangible rights").<br/><br/>QUERY: How to determine whether an interest is property? See, e.g., United States v. D'Amato, 39 F.3d 1249, 1258 (2d Cir. 1994) (shareholder's property rights to information are defined by state law and the law of fraud); cf. Henry, 29 F.3d at 115 ("[T]o determine whether a particular interest is property for purposes of the fraud statutes, we look to whether the law traditionally has recognized and enforced it as a property right."); see also Eilers & Silikovitz, 31 Am. Crim. L. Rev. at 706 n. 19 (case cited).<br/><br/><br/>Fiduciary Duty<br/><br/>QUERY: Whether a fiduciary duty or relationship is a necessary ingredient to frauds relating to intangible property rights. See generally Laura A. Eilers & Harvey B. Silikovitz, Mail and Wire Fraud, 31 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 703, 706 n. 19 (1994) ("Unlike traditional frauds which may arise regardless of the relationship between the defendant and the victim, frauds related to intangible rights stem from a fiduciary relationship between the defendant and the defrauded party or entity."). "At the core of the judicially defined 'scheme to defraud' is the notion of a trust owed to another and a subsequent breach of that trust." United States v. Lemire, 720 F.2d 1327, 1335 (D.C. Cir. 1983) ("But '[n]ot every breach of a fiduciary duty works a criminal fraud.'") (quoting United States v. George, 477 F.2d 508 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 827 (1973)), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 (1984). But cf. United States v. Sawyer, 878 F. Supp. 279, 288-90 (D. Mass. 1995) (mail fraud statutes do not require that a public fiduciary be a participant in the scheme). It may follow that to defraud one of the "right to honest services" would generally require a fiduciary relationship that creates the right to provide or protect honest services. It does not necessarily follow, however, that the existence or protection of an intangible property right must depend upon the existence of a fiduciary relationship or duty. Nonfiduciaries can steal, embezzle and defraud others of property interests, regardless of whether the property interest is tangible or intangible. Cf. United States v. Allen, 554 F.2d 398, 410 (10th Cir.) ("While the existence of a fiduciary duty is relevant and an ingredient in some mail fraud prosecutions, . . . it is not an essential in all such cases.") (citations omitted), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 836 (1977); Eilers & Silikovitz, 31 Am. Crim. L. Rev. at 711 ("There is some debate in the Circuit Courts about whether intangible rights can be violated if they are not premised upon fiduciary duty.").<br/><br/>Courts have held nonfiduciaries criminally liable for frauds related to intangible rights when a co-schemer or co-conspirator was a fiduciary. See United States v. Alexander, 741 F.2d 962, 964 (7th Cir. 1984) (an intangible rights scheme is cognizable when at least one of the schemers has a fiduciary relationship with the defrauded person or entity), overruled on other grounds by, United States v. Ginsburg, 773 F.2d 798 (7th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011 (1986); see also Sawyer, 878 F. Supp. at 289 (describing situation of nonfiduciary) (citing United States v. Margiotta, 688 F.2d 108, 121-23 (2d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 913 (1983), and Alexander, 741 F.2d at 964).<br/><br/><br/>Intent to Defraud<br/><br/>The government must prove that the defendant had the specific intent to defraud. See United States v. Diggs, 613 F.2d 988, 997 (D.C. Cir. 1979) ("Because only 'a scheme to defraud' and not actual fraud is required, proof of fraudulent intent is critical."), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 (1980); see also United States v. Costanzo, 4 F.3d 658, 664 (8th Cir. 1993) (intent is an essential element, inquiry is whether defendants intended to defraud); United States v. Porcelli, 865 F.2d 1352, 1358 (2d Cir.) (specific intent requires intent to defraud, not intent to violate the statute), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 810 (1989); cf. United States v. Reid, 533 F.2d 1255, 1264 n. 34 (D.C. Cir. 1976) ("Proof that someone was actually defrauded is unnecessary simply because the critical element in a 'scheme to defraud' is 'fraudulent intent,' Durland v. United States, 161 U.S. 306 . . . (1896), and therefore the accused need not have succeeded in his scheme to be guilty of the crime."); United States v. Bailey, 859 F.2d 1265, 1273 (7th Cir. 1988) (court held that there must be sufficient evidence that the defendant acted with intent to defraud, that is, "willful participation in [the] scheme with knowledge of its fraudulent nature and with intent that these illicit objectives be achieved." (quoting United States v. Price, 623 F.2d 587, 591 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1016 (1980), overruled on other grounds by, United States v. DeBright, 730 F.2d 1255 (9th Cir. 1984)), cert denied, 488 U.S. 1010 (1989).<br/><br/><br/>Proof of Fraudulent Intent<br/><br/>"The requisite intent under the federal mail and wire fraud statutes may be inferred from the totality of the circumstances and need not be proven by direct evidence." United States v. Alston, 609 F.2d 531, 538 (D.C. Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 918 (1980). Thus, intent can be inferred from statements and conduct. United States v. Cusino, 694 F.2d 185, 187 (9th Cir. 1982) (citing United States v. Beecroft, 608 F.2d 753, 757 (9th Cir. 1979)), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 932 (1983). Impression testimony, that is, testimony of victims as to how they had been misled by defendants, is admissible to show an intent to defraud. See Phillips v. United States, 356 F.2d 297, 307 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 952 (1966). Also consider complaint letters received by defendants as relevant to the issue of intent to defraud. The inference might be drawn that, since the defendant knew victims were being misled by solicitation literature and other representations, the continued operation of the business despite this knowledge showed the existence of a scheme to defraud.<br/><br/>Fraudulent intent is shown if a representation is made with reckless indifference to its truth or falsity. Cusino, 694 F.2d at 187. In addition, "[f]raudulent intent may be inferred from the modus operandi of the scheme." United States v. Reid, 533 F.2d 1255, 1264 n. 34 (D.C. Cir. 1976) ("[T]he purpose of the scheme 'must be to injure, which doubtless may be inferred when the scheme has such effect as a necessary result of carrying it out.") (quoting United States v. Regent Office Supply Co., 421 F.2d 1174, 1180-81 (2d Cir. 1970) (quoting Horman v. United States, 116 F. 350, 352 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 187 U.S. 641 (1902))). "Of course proof that someone was actually victimized by the fraud is good evidence of the schemer's intent." Id. (quoting Regent Office Supply Co., 421 F.2d at 1180-81). In United States v. D'Amato, the court explained the government's burden of proving fraudulent intent as follows:<br/><br/>The scheme to defraud need not have been successful or complete. Therefore, the victims of the scheme need not have been injured. However, the government must show "that some actual harm or injury was contemplated by the schemer." Because the defendant must intend to harm the fraud's victims, "[m]isrepresentations amounting only to a deceit are insufficient to maintain a mail or wire fraud prosecution." "Instead, the deceit must be coupled with a contemplated harm to the victim." In many cases, this requirement poses no additional obstacle for the government. When the "necessary result" of the actor's scheme is to injure others, fraudulent intent may be inferred from the scheme itself. Where the scheme does not cause injury to the alleged victim as its necessary result, the government must produce evidence independent of the alleged scheme to show the defendant's fraudulent intent.<br/>39 F.3d 1249, 1257 (2d Cir. 1994) (citations and footnote omitted) (holding that the government failed to produce legally sufficient evidence of criminal intent).<br/><br/><br/><br/>Use of Mailings and Wires in Furtherance of the Execution of the Scheme<br/><br/>"The federal mail fraud statute does not purport to reach all frauds, but only those limited instances in which the use of the mails is a part of the execution of the fraud, leaving all other cases to be dealt with by appropriate state law." United States v. Schmuck, 489 U.S. 705, 710 (1989) (quoting Kann v. United States, 323 U.S. 88, 95 (1944)); accord United States v. Coachman, 727 F.2d 1293, 1302 n. 43 (D.C. Cir. 1984) ("The offense of mail fraud demands proof of a scheme to defraud which, at some point, is intentionally furthered by use of the mails.").<br/><br/>"It is not necessary that the scheme contemplate the use of the mails as an essential element." Pereira v. United States, 347 U.S. 1, 8 (1954); Durland v. United States, 161 U.S. 306, 313 (1896) (proof of specific intent to use the mails on the part of defendants need not be proven). "It is sufficient for the mailing to be 'incident to an essential part of the scheme,' . . . or 'a step in [the] plot' . . . . " Schmuck, 489 U.S. at 710-11 (citations omitted); cf. United States v. Diggs, 613 F.2d 988, 998 (D.C. Cir.) ("[A]lthough the schemer need not 'contemplate the use of the mails as an essential element,' the mailings must be sufficiently closely related to [the] scheme to bring his conduct within the statute.") (footnote omitted), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 (1980); United States v. Alston, 609 F.2d 531, 538 (D.C. Cir. 1979) ("For conviction under the mail fraud statute, the mails must be used 'for the purpose of executing' the fraudulent scheme, and not merely 'as a result of' such scheme.") (quoting Kann, 323 U.S. 88), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 918 (1980).<br/><br/>As in the case of mail fraud, a wire transmission may be considered to be for the purpose of furthering a scheme to defraud if the transmission is incident to the accomplishment of an essential part of the scheme. United States v. Mann, 884 F.2d 532, 536 (10th Cir. 1984). Moreover, it is not necessary to show that the defendant directly participated in the transmission, where it is established that the defendant caused the transmission, and that such use was the foreseeable result of his acts. United States v. Gill, 909 F.2d 274, 277-78 (7th Cir. 1990); United States v. Jones, 554 F.2d 251, 253 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 866 (1977) (cases cited); United States v. Wise, 553 F.2d 1173 (8th Cir. 1977).<br/><br/>The gist of the offenses is not the scheme to defraud, but the use of the mails or interstate wire communication. See United States v. Garland, 337 F. Supp. 1, 3 (N.D. Ill. 1971); see also United States v. Gardner, 65 F.3d 82, 85 (8th Cir. 1995) ("The use of the post office establishment in the execution of the alleged scheme to obtain money by false pretenses is the gist of the offense which the statute denounces, and not the scheme to defraud.") (quoting Cochran v. United States, 41 F.2d 193, 197 (8th Cir. 1930)), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 748 and 116 S.Ct. 1044 (1996); United States v. Lebovitz, 669 F.2d 894, 898 (3d Cir.) ("The gist of the offense of mail fraud is the use of mails by someone to carry out some essential element of the fraudulent scheme or artifice."), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 929 (1982). Accordingly, each use of the mails (in the case of mail fraud) and each separate wire communication (in the case of wire fraud) constitutes a separate offense, i.e., each mailing and/or wire transmission can constitute a separate count in the indictment. See, e.g., United States v. Pazos, 24 F.3d 660, 665 (5th Cir. 1994) (mail fraud); United States v. Rogers, 960 F.2d 1501, 1514 (10th Cir.) (each use of mails is separate offense), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1035 (1992); United States v. Castillo, 829 F.2d 1194, 1199 (1st Cir. 1987) (wire fraud).<br/><br/><br/>Proof of Mailings and Transmissions<br/><br/>The mailing or wire communication may be proven by circumstantial evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Griffith, 17 F.3d 865, 874 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 149 (1994); United States v. Bowman, 783 F.2d 1192, 1197 (5th Cir. 1986) (mailings performed in the course of the bank's customary practices) (citing United States v. Ledesma, 632 F.2d 670, 675 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 998 (1980)); United States v. Brooks, 748 F.2d 1199, 1202-03 (7th Cir. 1984) (introduction of envelope). But see United States v. Hannigan, 27 F.3d 890, 895 (3d Cir. 1994) (defendant's statement that he received check was insufficient to prove check was sent through the mails).<br/><br/>"To constitute a violation of [§ 1341] . . ., it is not necessary to show that [defendants] actually mailed . . . anything themselves; it is sufficient if they caused it to be done. Pereira v. United States, 347 U.S. 1, 8 (1954) (citing 18 U.S.C. (Supp. V) § 2(b)); United States v. Kenofskey, 243 U.S. 440, 443 (1917) ("Cause" is used "in its well-known sense of bringing about . . . ."); accord United States v. Diggs, 613 F.2d 988, 998 (D.C. Cir.) ("One must 'cause' the mails to be used" to satisfy the element of "use of the United States mails 'for the purpose of executing the scheme.'") (quoting United States v. Maze, 414 U.S. 395, 400 (1974) (quoting Kann v. United States, 323 U.S. 88, 94 (1944), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 (1980). The government need show only that the defendant "caused" the mailing by acting "with knowledge that the use of the mails follow in the ordinary course of business, or where such use can reasonably be foreseen, even though not actually intended." Pereira, 347 U.S. at 8-9.<br/><br/><br/>"'[I]nnocent' mailings - ones that contain no false information - may supply the mailing element." United States v. Schmuck, 489 U.S. 705, 715 (1989) (citing Parr v. United States, 363 U.S. 370, 390 (1960)). Moreover, the elements of mail fraud may be satisfied where the mailings have been routine. Mailings that may lead to the uncovering of the fraudulent scheme may also supply the mailing element of the mail fraud offense. Id. ("The relevant question at all times is whether the mailing is part of the execution of the scheme as conceived by the perpetrator at the time, regardless of whether the mailing later, through hindsight, may prove to have been counterproductive and return to haunt the perpetrator of the fraud.").<br/><br/><br/>Conspiracy to Violate the Mail Fraud or Wire Fraud Statutes<br/><br/>Where a scheme and artifice to defraud is shared by two or more, it becomes a conspiracy to defraud. The essential elements of conspiracy to commit mail fraud or wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, are (1) an agreement between two or more persons; (2) to commit mail fraud or wire fraud; and (3) an overt act committed by one of the conspirators in furtherance of the conspiracy. See United States v. Brumley, 79 F.3d 1430, 1442 (5th Cir. 1996) (citing United States v. Hatch, 926 F.2d 387, 393 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 943 (1991)); United States v. Massey, 827 F.2d 995, 1001 (5th Cir. 1987); United States v. Gordon, 780 F.2d 1165, 1170 (5th Cir. 1986)). "Conspiracy to commit a particular substantive offense cannot exist without at least the degree of criminal intent necessary for the substantive offense." Massey, 827 F.2d at 1001 (quoting Ingram v. United States, 360 U.S. 672, 678 (1959)).<br/><br/>As in any conspiracy, it is sufficient that the defendant knowingly joined the conspiracy in which wire fraud or mail fraud was a foreseeable act in furtherance of the conspiracy. United States v. Leahy, 82 F.3d 624 (5th Cir. 1996) (citing United States v. Basey, 816 F.2d 980, 997 (5th Cir. 1987) (holding that once a defendant's knowing participation in a conspiracy has been established, "the defendant is deemed guilty of substantive acts committed in furtherance of the conspiracy by any of his criminal partners")).<br/><br/><br/>Venue in Mail Fraud<br/><br/>Generally, 18 U.S.C. § 3237(a) provides that in cases where the offense was begun in one district and completed in another, venue may be laid in any district through which the offense was continued. <br/><br/>Section 1341, however, has its own "built-in" venue provisions. The locus of the offense under section 1341 has been carefully specified; and only the acts of "placing", "taking" and "causing to be delivered" at a specified place have been penalized. Venue should therefore be placed according to the specific prohibitions of section 1341, irrespective of section 3237(a). See Travis v. United States, 364 U.S. 631, 636-37 (1961) ("[V]enue should not be made to depend upon the chance use of the mails, when Congress has so carefully indicated the locus of the crimes."). The locus for mail fraud prosecutions is specifically set forth in section 1341; since Congress has "otherwise expressly provided," section 3237 is inapplicable to mail fraud.<br/><br/>Accordingly, venue must be charged in either (1) the district in which the letter was placed in the mail by the defendant; (2) the district in which the defendant took or received the letter from the mails; or (3) the district in which the defendant knowingly caused a letter to be delivered according to the direction thereon. Hagner v. United States, 285 U.S. 427 (1932)); see also United States v. Turley, 891 F.2d 57, 60 (3d Cir. 1989) (government conceded that section 3237 is not applicable to mail fraud).<br/><br/>Several decisions, citing as authority the provisions of section 3237(a), have held that venue for mail fraud prosecutions also lies in any district through which the count letter passed. Section 3237(a) must, however, be read in light of the constitutional requirements and the explicit provisions of section 1341. <br/><br/><br/>Defenses—Statute of Limitations<br/><br/>The statute of limitations for mail fraud and wire fraud prosecutions is five years (18 U.S.C. § 3282), except for mail and wire fraud schemes that affect a financial institution, in which case the statute is ten years (18 U.S.C. § 3293).<br/><br/>COMMENT: Consider that a scheme may extend back beyond the limitations period; the gist of the offense is the use of the mails, and if the prohibited use of the mails was within the period, the prosecution is timely. See O. Obermaier and R. Morvillo, White Collar Crime: Business and Regulatory Offenses, § 9.04[5], at 9-67 (Rel. 2, 1991) (citing cases); cf. United States v. Garfinkel, 29 F.3d 1253, 1259 (8th Cir. 1994) (mail fraud scheme may continue after mailing). That a scheme may extend back beyond the limitation period does not preclude prosecution of an offense committed in furtherance of the scheme within the period.<br/><br/><br/>Defenses—Good Faith<br/><br/>Good faith is recognized as a defense to a charge of mail or wire fraud. See, e.g., United States v. Casperson, 773 F.2d 216, 223 (8th Cir. 1985). For a discussion of the defense of good faith and the entitlement of jury instructions on this issue, see Green v. United States, 474 U.S. 925 (1985); see also Laura A. Eilers & Harvey B. Silikovitz, Mail and Wire Fraud, 31 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 703, 719 (1994) (and cases cited).<br/><br/><hr><br/><br/>Drafting a Mail Fraud and/or Wire Fraud Indictment<br/><br/>The Criminal Division has published a collection of indictment forms, Drafting Indictments most recently updated in March, 1995. These forms can be conveniently accessed and saved as word processing documents using USABook:<br/>Mail Fraud<br/>Mail Fraud Scheme/Artifice<br/><br/><br/>Sufficiency of Indictment—Generally<br/><br/>Generally, Rule 7(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure requires an indictment to provide "a plain, concise and definite written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged." United States v. Yefsky, 994 F.2d 885, 893 (1st Cir. 1993) ("The Supreme Court has instructed that an indictment is sufficient if it contains the elements of the offense charged, fairly informs the defendant of the charges against which he must defend, and enables him to enter a plea without fear of double jeopardy.") (citing Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87, 117 (1974)); see also Collins v. Markley, 346 F.2d 230, 232 (7th Cir.) (en banc) ("The sufficiency of an indictment is to be measured by certain guide lines. First, the indictment standing alone must contain the elements of the offense intended to be charged, and it must be sufficient to apprise the accused of the nature of the offense. Second, after conviction, the record of the case must be sufficient so that the accused can plead the judgment in bar of any subsequent prosecution for the same offense."), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 946 (1965).<br/><br/>Accordingly, a mail fraud or wire fraud indictment should contain a reasonably detailed description of the particular scheme the defendant is charged with devising to ensure that the defendant has sufficient notice of the nature of the offense. See Yefsky, 994 F.2d at 893 ("The indictment may incorporate the words of the statute to set forth the offense, but the statutory language '"must be accompanied with such a statement of the facts and circumstances as will inform the accused of the specific offense, coming under the general description, with which he is charged."'") (quoting Hamling, 418 U.S. at 117-18 (quoting United States v. Hess, 124 U.S. 483, 487 (1888))); cf. United States v. Nance, 533 F.2d 699, 702 (D.C. Cir. 1976) (noting with approval mail fraud count that specifies misrepresentations); United States v. Curtis, 506 F.2d 985, 990 (10th Cir. 1974) (citations omitted) (dismissing mail fraud indictment that excludes false pretenses).<br/><br/>In Yefsky, the court held that the indictment was defective in that it did not provide the defendant with adequate notice of the charge (conspiracy to commit mail fraud) against him. 994 F.2d at 993 ("Where guilt depends so crucially upon . . . a specific identification of fact, . . . cases have uniformly held that an indictment must do more than simply repeat the language of the criminal statute.") (citing Hamling, 418 U.S. at 118).<br/><br/>In Curtis, the court stated the following in considering the sufficiency of the allegations contained in an indictment charging mail fraud:<br/><br/>Mere evidential matters or detail more appropriate in bills of particular need not be pleaded in an indictment based upon 1341. [citations omitted] But as these cases demonstrate, some substantial indication of the nature or character of any scheme or artifice to defraud, or to obtain money or property by means of false pretenses, representations or promises is requisite. And it is not sufficient in this regard to merely plead the statutory language. [citations omitted] A reference to the cases cited first above will disclose that in each instance the nature of the schemes or artifices is identified or described, including the particular pretenses, representations or promises claimed to have been false.<br/><br/>506 F.2d at 989-90 (holding that the indictment, which pleaded little more than the statutory language without any fair indication of the nature or character of the scheme or artifice relied upon, or the false pretenses, misrepresentations or promises forming a part of it, was fatally defective); see also United States v. Crummer, 151 F.2d 958 (10th Cir. 1945) ("While the particulars of the scheme are matters of substance and therefore must be described with a degree of certainty sufficient to show its existence of character, and fairly to acquaint the defendant with the particular fraudulent scheme charged against him, still the scheme itself need not be pleaded with all the certainty in respect of time, place, and circumstance requisite in charging the mailing of the letter or other matter.") (allegations of the scheme held to be sufficient), cert. denied, 327 U.S. 785 (1946); cf. United States v. Azad, 809 F.2d 291, 295 (6th Cir. 1986) ("What distinguishes this indictment from the indictment found defective in [Curtis], . . . is the clear and specific description of the fraudulent scheme found in the present indictment. The indictment before us does provide some 'substantial indication of the nature or character' of the scheme involved, and 'the scheme itself need not be pleaded with all the certainty in respect of time, place, and circumstance requisite in charging the mailing of the letter or other matter.'" ) (quoting Curtis, 506 F.2d at 990), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1004 (1987); United States v. Adamo, 534 F.2d 31, 35 (3d Cir.) ("The Curtis indictment was so vague that trial might have proceeded upon an entirely different concept of the scheme than that contemplated by the grand jury when it returned the indictment. By contrast, the indictment in this case explicitly outlines the elements of the fraudulent plan."), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 841 (1976).<br/><br/><br/>Sufficiency of Indictment—Victims and Loss<br/><br/>Victims of the fraud do not have to be identified by name in the indictment. United States v. Mizyed, 927 F.2d 979 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 937 (1991). Moreover, actual monetary loss need not be alleged. United States v. Barber, 881 F.2d 345, 348-49 (7th Cir. 1989) ("It is true that the indictment does not allege an actual monetary or economic loss to any insurance company. However, it is not necessary that an indictment charging mail fraud contain such an allegation."), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 922 (1990); see also United States v. Ginsburg, 909 F.2d 982, 988 n. 8 (7th Cir. 1990) ("McNally does not require that actual loss of money or property be alleged in the indictment."); United States v. Bucey, 876 F.2d 1297, 1311 (7th Cir.) ("[S]ince the mail fraud statute punishes the scheme to defraud, this court has reiterated on numerous occasions that the ultimate success of the fraud and the actual defrauding of a victim are not necessary prerequisites to a successful mail fraud prosecution."), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1004 (1989).<br/><br/><br/>Sufficiency of Indictment—Mailings or Transmissions in Furtherance of Scheme<br/><br/>"The Government need not allege the subordinate evidentiary facts by which it intends to prove the 'in furtherance' element of the crime charged, and an indictment setting out the mailings charged and alleging that they were in furtherance of the scheme should not be dismissed as insufficient on its face unless there is no conceivable evidence that the Government could produce at trial to substantiate its 'in furtherance' allegation." United States v. Castor, 558 F.2d 379, 385 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1010 (1978). In Castor, the court observed the following concerning the requirement of alleging that the mailings were in furtherance of the scheme:<br/><br/>The question is not whether the indictment particularly alleges sufficient facts from which a jury could find that the mailings charged were in furtherance of the scheme, but rather whether the Government conceivably could produce evidence at trial showing that the designated mailings were for the purposes of executing the scheme. United States v. Sampson, 371 U.S. 75, 76, 83 S.Ct. 173, 9 L.Ed.2d 136 (1962). The resolution of the question of whether the mailings alleged were in furtherance of the scheme must await trial "unless it so convincingly appears on the face of the indictment that as a matter of law there need be no necessity for such delay." United States v. Feinberg, 50 F. Supp. 976, 977 (E.D.N.Y. 1973), aff'd, 140 F.2d 592 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 322 U.S. 726, 64 S.Ct. 943, 88 L.Ed. 1562 (1944).<br/>Id. at 384-85.<br/><br/><br/>Sufficiency of Indictment—Separate Offenses<br/><br/>Each mailing or transmission in furtherance of the scheme and artifice to defraud is a separate offense. See, e.g., United States v. Pazos, 24 F.3d 660, 665 (5th Cir. 1994)(mail fraud); United States v. Rogers, 960 F.2d 1501, 1514 (10th Cir.)(each use of mails is separate offense), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1035 (1992); United States v. Castillo, 829 F.2d 1194, 1199 (1st Cir. 1987)(wire fraud). Accordingly, proper draftsmanship requires that only one mailing or transmission should be alleged in each count. Otherwise, the count may be duplicitous.<br/><br/>Because descriptions of the scheme are frequently quite lengthy, it is suggested that those descriptive paragraphs set out in full in one count be adopted and incorporated into another count by suitable reference pursuant to the provision of Rule 7(c), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.<br/><br/><br/>Sufficiency of the Indictment—Special Considerations<br/><br/>Take care to charge the proper method of violation of the statute! For example, if the letter is mailed to the district of indictment from another district, be sure to charge a taking from the mails, or delivery according to the direction thereon, rather than a placing in the mail. Conversely, charge a placing in the mail in the district of indictment of a letter addressed to someone outside that district. See Hagner v. United States, 285 U.S. 427 (1932) (indictment loosely and inartfully drawn).<br/><br/><br/>Statement of Policy concerning Venue in Mail Fraud Prosecutions<br/><br/>Department of Justice policy opposes mail fraud venue based solely on the mail matter passing through a jurisdiction. <br/><br/><br/>18 U.S.C. Section 1341—Elements of Mail Fraud<br/><br/>"There are two elements in mail fraud: (1) having devised or intending to devise a scheme to defraud (or to perform specified fraudulent acts), and (2) use of the mail for the purpose of executing, or attempting to execute, the scheme (or specified fraudulent acts)." Schmuck v. United States, 489 U.S. 705, 721 n. 10 (1989); see also Pereira v. United States, 347 U.S. 1, 8 (1954) ("The elements of the offense of mail fraud under . . . § 1341 are (1) a scheme to defraud, and (2) the mailing of a letter, etc., for the purpose of executing the scheme."); Laura A. Eilers & Harvey B. Silikovitz, Mail and Wire Fraud, 31 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 703, 704 (1994) (cases cited).<br/><br/><br/><br/>Knowingly and Willfully<br/><br/>The prohibition of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 requires that the false statement, concealment or cover up be "knowingly and willfully" done, which means that "The statement must have been made with an intent to deceive, a design to induce belief in the falsity or to mislead, but § 1001 does not require an intent to defraud -- that is, the intent to deprive someone of something by means of deceit." United States v. Lichenstein, 610 F.2d 1272, 1276-77 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 (1980). The government may prove that a false statement was made "knowingly and willfully" by offering evidence that defendants acted deliberately and with knowledge that the representation was false. See United States v. Hopkins, 916 F.2d 207, 214 (5th Cir. 1990). The jury may conclude from a plan of elaborate lies and half-truths that defendants deliberately conveyed information they knew to be false to the government. Id. at 214-15.<br/><br/>As used in the statute, the term "knowingly" requires only that the defendant acted with knowledge of the falsity. See United States v. Lange, 528 F.2d 1280, 1287-89 (5th Cir. 1976). As in other situations, to commit an act "knowingly" is to do so with knowledge or awareness of the facts or situation, and not because of mistake, accident or some other innocent reason. See Fifth Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions, § 1.35 (1990). Knowledge of the criminal statute governing the conduct is not required.<br/><br/>The false statement need not be made with an intent to defraud if there is an intent to mislead or to induce belief in its falsity. Reckless disregard of whether a statement is true, or a conscious effort to avoid learning the truth, can be construed as acting "knowingly." United States v. Evans, 559 F.2d 244, 246 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1015 (1978).<br/><br/>A defendant is not relieved of the consequences of a material misrepresentation by lack of knowledge when the means of ascertaining truthfulness are available. In appropriate circumstances, the government may establish the defendant's knowledge of falsity by proving that the defendant either knew the statement was false or acted with a conscious purpose to avoid learning the truth. See United States v. West, 666 F.2d 16, 19 (2d Cir. 1981); Lange, 528 F.2d at 1288; United States v. Clearfield, 358 F. Supp. 564, 574 (E.D. Pa. 1973). Proof that the defendant acted with reckless disregard or reckless indifference may therefore satisfy the knowledge requirement, when the defendant makes a false material statement and consciously avoids learning the facts or intends to deceive the government. See United States v. Schaffer, 600 F.2d 1120, 1122 (5th Cir. 1979).<br/><br/>The term "willfully" means no more than that the forbidden act was done deliberately and with knowledge, and does not require proof of evil intent. McClanahan v. United States, 230 F.2d 919, 924 (5th Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 824 (1956); McBride v. United States, 225 F.2d 249, 255 (5th Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 934 (1956). An act is done "willfully" if done voluntarily and intentionally and with the specific intent to do something the law forbids. There is no requirement that the government show evil intent on the part of a defendant in order to prove that the act was done "willfully." See generally United States v. Gregg, 612 F.2d 43, 50-51 (2d Cir. 1979); American Surety Company v. Sullivan, 7 F.2d 605, 606 (2d Cir. 1925)(Hand, J.); United States v. Peltz, 433 F.2d 48, 54-55 (2d Cir. 1970),cert. denied, 401 U.S. 955 (1971) (involving 15 U.S.C. § 32(a). See also 1 E. Devitt, C. Blackmar, M. Wolff & K. O'Malley, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, § 17.05 (1992).<br/><br/><br/>Obstructing or Impairing Legitimate Government Activity<br/><br/>Under 18 U.S.C. § 371, the fraud or impairment of legitimate government activity may take any of several forms:<br/><br/>Bribery of a government employee, kickbacks to government employees or extortion of money or favors by government employees, misrepresentations of financial capability, alteration or falsification of official records, submission of false documents; and<br/><br/>Obstructing, in any manner, a legitimate governmental function.<br/><br/><br/>18 U.S. Code § 1342 - Fictitious name or address<br/><br/>Whoever, for the purpose of conducting, promoting, or carrying on by means of the Postal Service, any scheme or device mentioned in section 1341 of this title or any other unlawful business, uses or assumes, or requests to be addressed by, any fictitious, false, or assumed title, name, or address or name other than his own proper name, or takes or receives from any post office or authorized depository of mail matter, any letter, postal card, package, or other mail matter addressed to any such fictitious, false, or assumed title, name, or address, or name other than his own proper name, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.Terancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8495349982447643424.post-32795357547506831032015-01-30T08:26:00.000-05:002015-02-19T16:11:24.299-05:00Fake Documents Provide No Protection and Create PerilThe repeated filing of fraudulent documents by Genuine Title Company does not change anything about the fraudulent conveyance of MY PROPERTY.<br/><br/>The improper ruling by the Miller's friend GAIL WEILHIEMER fails to indicate that they own the house. It only says that the issue is dismissed. Improperly done and with no basis in law. Keeping me homeless and their family in a perilous situation. <br/><br/>PERIL: ... because they may attempt to set me up for their murders. We are dealing with twisted law enforcement so clearly bent on perverting truths based on their poorly thought out fiction. The Miller family is at risk from the known sociopaths in the County.<br/><br/>There's is no safety or security in fraud. There is great peril in exposure and massive county efforts to conceal a crime.<br/><br/>There is no lawfulness attained by repeated filing of fraudulent documents with the Recorder of Deeds. Certainly not when the ROD knows that the fraudulent conveyance crime occurred... ROD referred the case to the FBI... ROD referred the case to the County Detectives... ROD knows the county corruption which creates the 'madman' and pushes him to act. ROD doesn't validate or verify. ROD records even when they know the documents are fraud. <br/><br/><h2>Over 40 Million Foreclosures</h2><br/>Over 40 million foreclosures nationwide were based on forged and robosigned fraudulent documents presented by lawyers and title companies and upheld in courts mandated to confidentiality under Rule 1.6 - permitting fraud in the furtherance of fraud - mandating non-disclosure. - preventing efforts to rectify. Those 'fraud provisions' removed from the minimum ethical standard - Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Written and promoted by the American Bar Association whose members profited as they stole people's homes. <br/><br/><h2>"Career lawmen think strategically. They don’t go for the immediate gratification of a personal attack, instead preferring to set the board up just right and striking at the precise moment where the object of the attack cannot recover." - Bruce Castor<br/> </h2><br/><br/>The lawyers from Zarwin, Baum, DeVito, Kaplan, Schaer & Toddy presented no rights to ownership and had no defense - a situation which would result in sanctions - yet, the matter was dismissed. On Appeal is became even more evident and involved more 'judges' who covered for the lawyers who acted without any basis and could face sanctions and damages. BUT the judges took no part in it. <br/><br/>The forged documents filed by the court staff without judicial review showed the interference with the administration of justice and other constitutional offenses. Reported to multiple law enforcement agencies -county, state and federal levels. The issue is pending. The silence grows louder and louder.<br/><br/>These are the corrupt acts which place people and their family in peril and at risk. The efforts to cover up the crimes is often greater than the initial crime and continues until someone is dead. <br/><br/>A person protecting their own property is a stand your ground situation... only if they own the property. Trespassers have no property rights and may be dealt with accordingly.<br/><br/>Bear in mind, the corrupt law enforcement folks don't give a damn about the lives of the people they use to manipulate their corruption. Those they cause to be killed only serve to provide a false grandstand decked out in red white and blue with a District Attorney at the microphone spouting rhetoric without facts... attacking and assassinating the character of the puppet they created.<br/><br/>A dead family gives them the headlines they crave and the audience who falls for their theater of self-righteousness. The six people who were murdered by Bradley Stone are not available to tell you about their success in court and the great efforts of the county personnel who caused their deaths... and who went home from work and celebrated their holidays with their families. <br/><br/>With everyone dead, the County never even have to prove that Bradley Stone did it. Case closed.<br/><br/>"Career lawmen think strategically. They don’t go for the immediate gratification of a personal attack, instead preferring to set the board up just right and striking at the precise moment where the object of the attack cannot recover." Former District Attorney Bruce Castor. In his New Years Eve manifesto written days before he announced he was running for the position of District Attorney again. The same position he held when Healy v Healy began in 2007.<br/><br/><center><table width=80%><tr><td>The efforts to undermine me continue... I am sane. I have the paperwork to prove that. The continued efforts to attempt to have someone assigned power of attorney to conceal the crimes is not unnoticed. It's not even cleverly calculated and executed. <br/><br/>The local Warrington police seem to have had enough of being improperly used and manipulated into the corrupt games of Montgomery County. They know what is happening. They have been informed of every development. Every false report involving them has been addressed without hesitation or delay. <br/><br/>The lengths that corrupt Montgomery County officials and officers will go to has no limit.</td></tr></table></center><br/> <br/><h2>I am capable of perseverence. <br/>They are capable of far more heinous acts.</h2>Terancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8495349982447643424.post-11854928131644276022015-01-30T02:05:00.000-05:002015-02-19T16:11:24.277-05:00Who are the people in your neighborhood?The use of confidential informants, their handlers and private investigators to set up people targeted for destruction by the county is pervasive.<br/><br/>For their safety, I have not posted the names pictures and stories of those used in the actions which FAILED to result in my prosecution. THEY FAILED. They failed to create the criminal to prosecute.<br/><br/>BUT, where I get punished because of their failure to make me a criminal. Where I have continued to be denied Life and liberty, protection of the law and my constitutional rights. Why should I be the responsible protective citizen? Let them deal with the bloodbath when their 'personnel' are exposed. Courtesy of those capable of hurting people. The ones they 'tricked' and jailed. Their lives and futures destroyed.<br/><br/>The only way to end a war "with a person who spends his/her professional life figuring how to [screw] others…” is to expose them for the corrupt criminal frauds that they are. <a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/2015/01/commissioner-bruce-castor-schooled-in-how-to-really-hurt-you-and-to-screw-others/" title="Commissioner Bruce Castor “schooled in how to really hurt you” and “to [screw] others”" target="_blank">Former District Attorney Bruce Castor summed up his methods concisely on NYE.</a> Then when not appointed Attorney General decided to return to the DA's position of twisted and perverted power.<br/><br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/2011/06/a-terroristic-divorce/" target="_blank">Their informants handlers and investigators are about to become VERY exposed.</a> Every single one who planted the devices cleared out by the sheriffs department on the day I was thrown out of my home by a corrupt court order. Every one who hit that shelf in the bathroom while setting their devices. Names and pictures... including the cities where they relocated. Bios, pictures, addresses and videos.<br/><br/>And the effort to conceal all of the failed investigative information by using a grand jury, doesn't require me to not IDENTIFY each person and the tactics utilized as they terrorized my life, spied and recorded every interaction, and paralyzed me with fear while they met within earshot.<br/><br/>When they informed and threatened my children who now fear any interaction because of what you will do to them if they 'slip up'. <br/><br/>The twisted monsters in law enforcement who are above the law running the drug trade and creating their new stories. The people who lie so often to everyone and themselves cannot recognize the truth and have no sense of honor and responsibility. Their crimes are justified by lies. Concealed by further lies... and injustice, and grand juries, and secret court orders.<br/><br/>Without the secrecy and protection of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information, law enforcement would not be able to conceal their investigation and false litigation and manipulations which denied constitutional rights and the protection of the law. That lawlessness continues because otherwise this target will survive to expose that law enforcement committed major crimes and constitutional violations which were concealed by a corrupted judiciary.<br/><br/>WHAT IF: Sorry Mr. Healy, but your wife's attorneys leveraged a massive investigation into you. It failed to produce the desired results BUT it did terrorize you for several years. They then leveraged that to coerce Carolyn Carluccio to go FULL FORCE TO SUICIDE. That failed too. The grand jury is concealing it, BUT every judge in Montgomery and the Superior Court has been manuipulated into approving the actions to terrorize you for years. Your suicide was a necessity and your survival makes things difficult. Your survival was not expected AND PLACES OUR CAREERS AT RISK because we wasted millions trying to destroy you.<br/><br/>The lawyers who tricked the county into becoming their tools in a divorce would turn on them and leverage the extensive county efforts which failed to set-up the target. Sociopath lawyers who will stop at nothing. And the law enforcement and judiciary which will capitulate. A sickening disgraceful twisted plot.<br/><br/>Enough is enough. <br/><br/>Handlers never tell the informants that they will end up dead OR be prosecuted anyway. Even in Hollywood, there's always have that scene where the handler is sad because they lost ANOTHER informant. They are consoled by being reminded they lost others by another handler who lost others. The joke - Handlers that care even when they lose EVERY informant.<br/><br/>Confidential Informants are always one degree away from lawyers and law enforcement. This is useful to leverage their participation and threaten them to do ANYTHING requested no matter how wrong or immoral.Terancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8495349982447643424.post-51747797504672396022015-01-29T10:25:00.000-05:002015-02-19T16:11:24.247-05:00Insurance Policies on Targets pushed to SuicideWhere the calculated actions of Angst & Angst and Zarwin, Baum, DeVito, Kaplan, Schaer & Toddy occurred with the lawless endorsements of the court... and the forged and fraudulent documents on appeal...<br/><br/>How does one go about finding out who had insurance policies on the target of their litigation who they were strategically guiding towards suicide by injustice"?<br/><br/>How many were gambling on that death?<a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/dd271779a4b93504ac9aa225831e70d3.jpg"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/dd271779a4b93504ac9aa225831e70d3-225x300.jpg" alt="dd271779a4b93504ac9aa225831e70d3" width="225" height="300" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-10529" /></a><br/><br/>How many were coerced into participation by the pay-off?<br/><br/>How many worked for Montgomery county?<br/><br/>How many worked for Liberty Mutual? or Golden Eagle? <br/><br/>How many worked for Genuine Title?<br/><br/><Center><em>I don't know who you are. I don't know what you want. <br/>If you're looking for ransom, I can tell you I don't have money but what I do have are a very particular set of skills. <br/>Skills I have acquired over a very long career. <br/>Skills that make me a nightmare for people like you. </em></center>Terancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8495349982447643424.post-38416488876622816762015-01-28T06:45:00.000-05:002015-02-19T16:11:24.225-05:00The Terror of a Constant ThreatThe recipient of Rule 1.6 injustice has no protection of the law. Their constitutional rights are ignored by the courts and law enforcement. All legal professionals are prevented from helping or doing anything to resolve ANY situation. Triggered by an act of judicial misconduct, Rule 1.6 secretly and silently undermines a litigant while attempting to conceal the injustice of a judge and <em>protect the integrity of the judiciary</em>.<br/><br/>There is no opportunity to succeed in a court. Without the rule of law and while constitutional rights are being ignored, survival is the best possible outcome - - BUT the victim does not know that and arrives in court... Prepared. Researched. Documented. Properly executed. Procedures followed. Yet, the victim leaves court battered and further threatened and terrified by the experience of the inexplicable actions of a corrupted court. The court provides no explanations for their injustice. Rule 1.6 Confidentiality applies.<br/><br/>The ONLY person in the courtroom who believes in 'the justice system' is the unwitting target who trusts it. Everyone else knows that there will be no justice. The lawyers, the judges, the court staff, the deputies observe the corruption and injustice. They witness justice. Intimidated by corruption, THEY RECOGNIZE WHEN A PROCEEDING IS A FARCE.<br/><br/>A FARCE. Every proceeding. For years.<br/><br/>In hindsight, it is clear and undeniable. Procedures are not followed. Protocol is abandoned. The law is ignored. Rights protected by the US Constitution are unavailable. Court Orders are not enforced. Only their victim is swiftly held to a stringent adherence to every procedure, protocol, law, and order. The victim must respond to and address and disprove each and every false allegation against them to survive it. <br/><br/>Robert Angst and Valerie Angst, the lawyers with education and a staff are excused from every failure. Their failures are deliberate. They serve to create an undercurrent of deliberate chaos. An ever increasing volume of issues to be presented. A cacophony of injustice which will 'annoy the living shit' out of the judge who knows that the entire thing is a complete farce. Angst & Angst made certain that they were protected from any backlash by a judge who ignored their every failure. <br/><br/>In the end, it is the document filed by Robert Angst to prevent any divorce decree from being issued 'pre-maturely' which exacerbates the procedural defect and a law deliberately constructed and enacted to assure litigants had the opportunity to be heard. Where neither party requested the entry of the divorce decree the court lacks authority and jurisdiction to enter an order. Robert Angst had filed a document indicating that a divorce decree should NOT be entered. Where neither party requested the entry of the Divorce Decree, and the Plaintiff through her lawyers indicated they did NOT want the entry of a divorce decree, Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio acted in the clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction.<br/><br/>The calculated actions of Angst & Angst neglected due process, procedure and law with intent. Those actions would appear to create a form of leverage whereby the judge might be lenient on their next failure. While every proceeding was pre-determined to deny any success to the hopeful victim, they were daring the judge to follow procedure and law. Sociopaths throwing the judge under the bus. By creating a 'clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction' for the judiciary, Angst & Angst were able to leverage judicial immunity for further injustice. <br/><br/>Absolute Judicial Immunity is provided to the judiciary even where the judicial actions of the judge…<br/>… exceed their jurisdiction,<br/>… are done maliciously or corruptly, or<br/>… are flawed by grave procedural error.<br/><br/>THERE IS A SINGLE EXCEPTION. In order to lose immunity, there must be a clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction. <br/><br/>Where any judge strikes the defective and void order, they would be expose the liability of their benchmates. Angst & Angst again leverage the corruption of the judiciary and attempt to enforce a defective and void order. The Court complies with their extortion by COMPLETELY IGNORING THAT THE ORDER IS VOID AND COMPLETELY NEGLECTING THE CHALLENGE TO JURISDICTION. The terror of an 'unappealable order' which defies the attention of the court and threatens the life and liberty of the victim.<br/><br/>Why would there be twenty (20) judges involved in the matter of Healy v Healy? Imagine the shame and self-loathing which would occur when you are participating in a deliberate injustice, violating the trust of a litigant, a rouse to harass and terrify. Angst & Angst were doing everything possible to ensure that the judge excused and ignored enough of their wrong-doing to be identified as an active and involved participant. Those actions were being subsequently documented on the court record and were building a considerable volume of evidence. <br/><br/>Evidence of the procedural failures and the breach of protocol and violation of law are being presented in proceedings to enforce compliance with court orders - yet, the judge dismisses every matter without explanation. The judge can't tell the litigant that THE ENTIRE THING IS JUST A SHAM TO TERRORIZE A MAN. The judge is disgusted and just wants out. The judge's integrity is being sacrificed while Rule 1.6 prevents explanation or resolution or escape.<br/><br/>Where every judicial proceeding and action has been a complete sham. A performance whereby the victim is attacked again and again... because the victim survives, there will be further actions. NO ONE WILL STOP THEIR DESTRUCTIVE FARCE... Rule 1.6 allows fraud in the furtherance of fraud. Rule 1.6 does not permit disclosure to rectify the fraud. Rule 1.6 prevents every legal professional from helping. <br/><br/>Their 'FARCE' has denied life and liberty. Destroyed Financially. Isolated and divided family. Prevented custody and visitation. Left you unemployed, homeless and threatened with jail. Attached supporters bank accounts. Infiltrated all technology - your friends tech also. False friendships by Investigators and Informants. Required additional litigation, additional parties. Undermined an entire judiciary. Nine (9) years of my life. Prevented and denied any future relief or escape. THIS IS A DIVORCE. This is not a criminal case. <br/><br/>Only in the family courts can someone who has committed no crime lose everything. <br/><br/>WTF? <a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/2013/05/a-message-to-the-judiciary-of-montgomery-county-pennsylvania/" target="_blank">I asked that in a letter to the Montgomery County Judiciary two months before I realized Rule 1.6 was the problem.</a> There was no response.<br/><br/>The available resources, actions and efforts to terrorize their victim to being 1) homeless/destitute 2) incarcerated or 3) suicide are not as arbitrary as you might think. A review of documents which relate to good mental health practices when going through a stressful period demonstrates a disturbing strategy. Their litigation has been designed to undermine the target psychologically by removing or obstructing support and coping methods while isolating the victim. They are undermining emotional and mental health by directly inhibiting efforts which provide resilience. <br/><br/>Acting above the law without any sense of moral responsibility or social conscience they wrote a law which permitted every act against the target and prevented any escape. As long as the target is not going to be murdered, Rule 1.6 confidentiality mandates non-disclosure. Driving a target to suicide is an acceptable 'loophole'. Only a sociopath would design a system by which criminals were not permitted to kill, but permitted to bring about a suicide. Kutek would be horrified. <br/><br/>Lawyers rejected the 'fraud provisions' of Rule 1.6 against the prolonged debate and strong lobbying efforts of Robert Kutek while writing the code of ethical conduct for lawyers. Weeks after Kutek's sudden death in 1983, the fraud provisions were removed from Rule 1.6 and promoted by the American Bar Association to each state as an ethical standard while it's lack of ethics was inconsequential. In a clear contradiction to his legacy, the ABA refers to the committee responsible for the Rules of Professional Conduct as The Kutek Commission. <br/><br/>Rule 1.6 Confidentiality undermines the judiciary and every proceeding. The injustice grows while Rule 1.6 prevents resolution or escape from further actions. I would hope that my case is an extreme. My case demonstrates the broad affect of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality which prevents any remedy. It is the volume of information and experiences which lead to the discovery of the needle in the haystack of injustice. Where no explanation was offered... and no question answered... EVER. Rule 1.6 could be applied to 'justify' the silence.<br/><br/>Rule 1.6 non-disclosure is permitted to conceal Rule 1.6 non-disclosure. They won't say anything and won't tell you why... Rule 1.6 is permitted to be invoked without invoking it. Rule 1.6 makes it possible to break the law, commit acts in the furtherance of that fraud, undermine the integrity and independence of the judiciary, prevent exposure through further fraud AND NOT EVER INDICATE THAT RULE 1.6 is involved. Ex parte communications, letters and meetings which arrange the injustice and corruption are also Rule 1.6 Confidential.<br/><br/>Prevented from information and denied rights and the protection of the law, my experience may be extreme but it is not isolated or unique... Rule 1.6 is law in every state. A violation of the public trust by the Judicial branch. The judiciary are accorded respect and honor BY LAW because it is necessary for the People to trust in JUSTICE. <br/><br/>The American Bar Association's Rule 1.6 has leveraged the public trust to undermine the judiciary. The only folks who profit from injustice are the members of the ABA and its affiliated organizations. <br/><br/>THE SCANDAL OF RULE 1.6 IS BIG. VERY BIG. HUGE.<br/><br/>JUSTICE IS COMING.Terancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8495349982447643424.post-66235549883878881942015-01-27T07:38:00.000-05:002015-02-19T16:11:24.202-05:00WWKKD? What Would Kathleen Kane Do?QUESTION: If Attorney General Kathleen Kane recognizes the unconstitutional aspects of Rule 1.6, confidentiality and non-disclosure would not be obligated. ... WHAT WOULD KATHLEEN KANE DO? WHAT WOULD KATHLEEN KANE SAY? <br/><br/><br/>Fact: Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane is required to follow the US Constitution, the PA Constitution and the Rules of Professional Conduct.<br/><br/>Fact: An unconstitutional law is a nullity. No Law. It has no effect. (Judicial Branch has claimed exclusive rights to deciding constitutionality.)<br/><br/>Fact: Kathleen Kane did not defend a law which she believed to be unconstitutional. Similar laws had already been recognized as unconstitutional in many other states. Her actions were in accordance with the law. The Pennsylvania law was eventually recognized as unconstitutional. <br/><br/>Fact: Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct is unconstitutional as it collaterally affects the substantive rights of litigants.<br/><br/>Fact: The Rules of Professional Conduct has a self-defense built in where non-disclosure is mandated where information would adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary. All non-disclosure and confidentiality is accomplished in the "rules" by direct reference to Rule 1.6.<br/><br/>Fact: The Rules of Professional Conduct are not enforced by the Attorney General. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court enforces the 'rules' through internal organizations within the judicial branch.<br/><br/>Fact: As a legal professional, the Attorney General must FOLLOW the Rules of Professional Conduct.<br/><br/>Fact: The US Constitution is the supreme law of the land.<br/><br/>Fact: The Pennsylvania Constitution may not infringe on the protections provided by the US Constitution.<br/><br/>Fact: Pennsylvania law must be constitutional - A REQUIREMENT of the PA Constitution and the US Constitution. <br/><br/>Fact: The Attorney General has the responsibility and obligation to address unconstitutional laws which affect every Pennsylvanian.<br/><br/><br/>ISSUE: How do you approach the constitutionality of a law which requires silence/confidentiality/non-disclosure by all legal professional/lawyers/judges.<br/><br/>ISSUE: How do you approach the constitutionality of a law which permits (mandates) fraud for the purpose of concealing a prior fraud? <br/><br/>ISSUE: How do you approach the constitutionality of a law which permits (mandates) fraud which prevents the prior fraud from being rectified? <br/><br/><br/>PROBLEM: Challenging an unconstitutional state law (which has been enacted in every state 1984-2009)<br/>- without any assistance from lawyers/legal professionals<br/>- where lawyers/legal professionals are permitted (mandated) to commit fraud to prevent your effort<br/>- where lawyers/legal professionals are mandated to confidentiality and non-disclosure<br/>- where the court staff are lawyers/legal professionals permitted (mandated) to commit fraud to prevent and conceal the issue<br/><br/>- where the unconstitutional law has been improperly enacted by the state supreme court<br/>- the state supreme court cannot strike the law without violating the law<br/><br/>- where all federal lawyers (government) are prevented from intervention (McDade-Murtha Amendment)<br/>- where the federal court staff are lawyers/legal professionals permitted (mandated) to commit fraud to prevent and conceal the issue (Local Rules)<br/><br/><br/>SOLUTION: A pre-emptive Constitutional Challenge in Federal Court which would return the litigants to the state court with their constitutional rights 'restored' and with protection of the Rule of Law.<br/>Success would require the attorney general to default in the matter. <br/>- by doing nothing and remaining silent, the attorney general/lawyer does not violate the law<br/>- by removing the discretionary decision from the judiciary, a judge does not violate the law in granting the 'default'<br/>- after the fact, the argument that the 'mandate' is discretionary could made and upheld in any disciplinary proceedings<br/><br/>The integrity of a judiciary permitted (mandated) to commit fraud to prevent and conceal the issue would be adversely affected by any and every discretionary decision. DEFAULT is the best, most effective lawful and constitutional approach.<br/><br/><center><table width=90%><tr><td>District Court</td><td>DEFAULT by 56 state attorneys general.<br/>A late-filed, electronically submitted, improperly titled document attributed to PA AG Kane which required a discretionary judicial response action resulted in dismissal. <em>There is no evidence of any judicial involvement.</em></td></tr><br/><tr><td>Reconsideration?</td><td>Denied.</td></tr><br/><tr><td>Third Circuit Court</td><td>Decision of the District Court was affirmed. <em>There is no evidence of any judicial involvement.</em></td></tr><br/><tr><td>Reconsideration?</td><td>Denied.</td></tr></table></center><br/><br/>BACK TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA... with Rule 1.6 still preventing the rule of law and my constitutional rights. This would demonstrate the issue, build evidence and adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary. No alternative.<br/> <br/><center><table width-90%><tr><td>In the Superior Court of Pennsylvania multiple appeals which referred to the issue of the Constitutional Challenge were reported to the Pennsylvania Attorney General as required by law and procedures.<br/><br/>After the notices were sent, a document was filed with the Superior Court. The Superior Court responded to the document. Requests for those documents were refused. The clerks removed the entry. Motions for the Production of the documents were denied without explanation. <em>There is no evidence of any judicial involvement.</em></td></tr></table></center><br/><br/>FACT: Two secret orders were issued by unidentified courts to Attorney General Kathleen Kane which prevented her from the responsibilities of her office and mandated her silence regarding the issue.<br/><br/>Evidence was reported to law enforcement that the appeals to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania were intercepted and prevented from any judicial review.<br/><br/>The Superior Court staff (lawyers/legal professionals) are permitted (mandated) to commit fraud to prevent and conceal the issue according to Rule 1.6. HOWEVER, were they to claim Rule 1.6 Confidentiality when faced with the violations of state and federal law and evidence of denial of access to the courts and other constitutionally protected rights, THEY WOULD PROVE THE LAW WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL.<br/><br/>As the actions of the lower court were done in clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction, the protection of absolute judicial immunity is not available. This may be hindering the Superior Court judiciary from covering for the court staff. <br/><br/>After the report to Law Enforcement, a Montgomery County Grand Jury called Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane for questioning. Violations of Grand Jury secrecy were purported reasons for the interview, however AG Kane was not permitted to speak about the grand jury investigation.<br/><br/>Two secret court orders from two unidentified courts.<br/>An alleged violation of a prior Grand Jury secrecy.<br/>Grand Jury secrecy imposed regarding their investigation.<br/><br/>A great clandestine effort has been put forth to silence and prevent the Attorney General from investigation and performing the responsibilities of her office.<br/><br/>These pre-emptive efforts of the unidentified judiciary appear to violate the separation of powers and the PA Constitution. The Judicial branch is ordering the Executive branch to neglect the laws of the Legislative branch. <br/><br/>An apparent overthrow of the Pennsylvania government by a judiciary which has demonstrated a lack of judicial independence to review cases before the courts, and the acceptance of the fraudulent, illegal and unconstitutional actions of the court staff. ALL CAUSED AND CONCEALED BY RULE 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION which the Supreme Court did NOT have the authority to enact where not "consistent with this Constitution and neither abridge, enlarge nor modify the substantive rights of any litigant." Pa Constitution Article 5 Section 10 (c)<br/><br/>Rule 1.6 has undermined the authority and independence of a judiciary held hostage which overreaches and usurps the authority of the state and federal government. One Law. Every State. Affects every judiciary at state and federal levels. Silently and Confidentially ignoring the rule of law and the Constitution of the United States.<br/><br/>The American Bar Association. The organization responsible for the 'Rules' presented as an ethical standard - but lacking ethics, morals and legalizing fraud for lawyers - has affiliated organizations and members in every state and federal court. Their 1983 exclusion of the 'fraud provisions' was deliberate. The resulting injustice clear. The effort to execute and conceal the sedition of the American government accomplished pursuant to the same law. CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION.<br/><br/><br/>LOGIC: If Attorney General Kathleen Kane recognizes the unconstitutional aspects of Rule 1.6, non-disclosure would not be obligated defend the law. WHAT WOULD KATHLEEN KANE DO?<br/><br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/kath.jpg"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/kath-300x199.jpg" alt="kath" width="300" height="199" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-6988" /></a>She's Kathleen Kane. Kathleen Kane does not do 'unconstitutional'. <br/><br/>Kathleen Kane would not be silenced by an unconstitutional law which mandates her silence and participation in a conspiracy. <br/><br/>Kathleen Kane is going to 'DO SOMETHING" and the constitutions and the law support her actions. <br/><br/><h2>How do you silence a "Rule 1.6 liberated Kathleen Kane"?</h2><br/>Issue court orders which silence her and prevent her action and investigation. Threaten sanctions and contempt of court for breaching those improper orders... Broadcast false information about her being 'above the law'... with a history of violating 'secrecy and confidentiality'... based on leaked reports from a grand jury... regarding the purported purpose of their investigation which was also leaked. Find a homophobe state representative to propose her impeachment because SHE WAS RIGHT about marriage laws... but he's still a homophobe.<br/><br/>Did I mention I was from Montgomery County? Two of those Appeals related to the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas. My divorce has been before 20 members of the Montgomery County Judiciary. In 2011, Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio, wife of Grand Jury Special Prosecutor Thomas Carluccio and then-President of the Montgomery County Bar Association, issued a deliberately defective and void order in clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction causing absolute judicial immunity to be unavailable for the entire bench. She did it to conceal another defective and void order in the matter from 2007 which undermined every proceeding, denied the rule of law, constitutional rights and subjected me to a level of injustice, surveillance and harassment that should have lead to suicide. Apparently, no court will address the defective and void order. And certainly not when it will 'clear the bench' and subject each judge to liability for damages.<br/><br/>The scandal of Rule 1.6 is big. Very big. Huge. It has been referred to as 'the worst kept secret in Pennsylvania" but is a national crisis. HUGE.<br/><br/>On CNN in November, Kane indicated:<br/>“I knew that I was walking into public corruption. Which again is why I ran.”<a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/kathleenkane.jpg"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/kathleenkane-193x300.jpg" alt="kathleenkane" width="193" height="300" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-7666" /></a><br/><br/>“But I will tell you this. Even I am shocked at the level of public corruption.”<br/><br/>“I am shocked at how deep it goes.<br/>I am shocked at how powerful it is.<br/>I have never seen anything like this. It’s breathtaking.<br/>It has been described by the people familiar with what is happening as shameful.”<br/><br/>“But, if this can be done to me as Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer of the 5th largest state in the country, I am sickened to think what can and may be done to regular, good people who don’t have the resources that I have to challenge it.”<br/><br/><hr><br/><br/>If you are thinking that this whackjob just doesn't want to be divorced. WRONG. When you have no protection of the law and no constitutional rights, you have no life. Every crime committed against you is ignored and excused. Every fraud and false allegation is prosecuted to the fullest extent by a 'corrupted' judiciary. Any success can be taken from you by false litigation. I have been unemployed since March 2007. Homeless since 2011. Destitute since 2007. Involved in constant litigation since 2007. When you have no rights, you face 3 possible destinations... 1) Homeless/Destitute 2) Incarcerated 3) Suicide. <br/><br/><hr><br/>UnConstitutional Law ? SILENCE ... (Secret Orders + Secret Courts)*Appeals + Grand Jury = SILENCE. <br/><br/>While it is clear why Attorney General Kathleen Kane is being SILENT, why has the news media neglected to present the story?Terancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8495349982447643424.post-15153033747435391392015-01-26T06:05:00.000-05:002015-02-19T16:11:24.179-05:00Montgomery County: Court Ordered Obstruction of JusticeIt is two Montgomery County cases which necessitated the efforts which revealed that Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information is unconstitutional. Most every aspect is documented in the court record. <br/><br/>Proving that once an act of judicial corruption or injustice occurred a litigant was deprived of any protection of the law; deprived of their constitutionally protected rights and liberties; and deprived of any resolution or remedy FOREVER. The injustice could be used (secretly) to affect and leverage any future matters which would come before the court. FOREVER. REALLY.<br/><br/>That injustice would also require legal professionals to ignore any future crimes committed against the victim where it might reveal that earlier judicial corruption and injustice. FOREVER. REALLY.<br/><br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Statue-poster.jpg"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Statue-poster-204x300.jpg" alt="Statue-poster" width="204" height="300" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-10468" /></a>The lawyers broke the system. Well, the lawyers had the judges break the system and THEN held the judiciary hostage and compelled them to actions which undermine the entire government. <br/><br/>The Constitution is not dead... it is being ignored... and those actions are concealed by an unconstitutional law improperly enacted in every state... and a federal law which requires the participation of government lawyers.<br/><br/><h2>THE REASON INJUSTICE IN AMERICA IS IGNORED.</h2><br/><br/>The laws is the law, but this Rule 1.6, which is aggressively enforced, requires lawyers and legal professionals to be silent.<br/><br/>AS THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW WAS BEING PRESENTED AND DEMONSTRATED IN THE PENNSYLVANIA COURTS, THE JUDICIARY HAS ACTED TO CONCEAL THE EMBARRASSMENT AND SHAME OF THEIR EGREGIOUS VIOLATION OF THE PUBLIC TRUST.<br/><br/>Where the state Attorney General must be advised of the constitutional issue before the courts, two secret courts have issued two secret orders requiring the inaction of the attorney general.<br/><br/>Where the state Attorney General would seek to investigate further, Montgomery County has acted further to silence the attorney general and prevent investigation and prosecution of their corruption.<br/><br/>All efforts are about non-disclosure. It is reasonable and logical to relate the efforts to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information. <br/><br/>Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional and has been improperly enacted by the state supreme court, the attorney general could expose the unconstitutional law without violating it.<br/><br/>When Rule 1.6 could no longer prevent it's own exposure to the public, the courts have acted by secret court order to mandate silence. If the attorney general speaks out about Rule 1.6, the AG would violate that court order and be sanctioned. <br/><br/>The secret court orders violate the constitutionally protected rights of a litigant. They will not hold up to any scrutiny on appeal, but the secret orders have provided a few more months of non-disclosure Misinformation can be used to attack the attorney general, and the court orders prevent her from any explanation or defense.<br/><br/>The cases in Montgomery County were so unjust. The Rule of Law ignored. Every member of the judiciary sacrificing their integrity to conceal the loss of the integrity of the prior judges. Those two cases have been before 20 members of the Montgomery County Judiciary. Those cases demonstrate the misuse of county resources and the involvement of the Superior Court authorizing intrusive surveillance. Those two cases demonstrate that the participation of EVERY legal professional was affected. They all did nothing. They all ignored everything.<br/><br/>After years of constant terror, the needle in the haystack of injustice was found. A Law which required legal professionals to do nothing... to ignore everything... and maintain confidentiality. A law which excused acts of fraud which were done to conceal the prior fraud. A law which allowed further acts of fraud which were done to conceal the prior fraud. A LAW THAT ONLY THE LAWYERS HAD TO FOLLOW. <br/><br/>A law that endorsed and concealed judicial corruption and injustice at EVERY level of the state and federal judiciary.<br/><br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/troy-davis-casey-anthony-justice-system-oj-simspon1.jpg"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/troy-davis-casey-anthony-justice-system-oj-simspon1-300x213.jpg" alt="troy-davis-casey-anthony-justice-system-oj-simspon1" width="300" height="213" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-10465" /></a>The twisted corruption of the Montgomery County Judiciary has exposed sedition by the American Bar Association in every state and federally. Exposed the actions of the affiliated bar associations to interfere with the administration of the courts at every level.<br/><br/>The Montgomery County Judiciary blew it. HUGE. <br/><br/>Their corruption has exposed the reason for the Constitutional Crisis in the US. <br/><br/>Their corruption has exposed the reason INJUSTICE is ignored by the legal community.<br/><br/>A lawyer who initially had been very skeptical of the Constitutional Challenge summed it up succinctly after he reviewed the details. <center><h2>"Wait until the People realize what you have discovered."</h2></center><br/><br/>JUSTICE IS COMING.<br/><br/><br/><table><tr><td>The broad actions of the US Department of Justice since the filing of the Constitutional Challenge in August 2013 demonstrates efforts to address Rule 1.6 injustice while the matter avoids media attention and broad exposure. Those actions are recognized as interim actions which indicate the intention to do the right thing... but doing it confidentially, until this law is stricken.</td></tr></table>Terancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8495349982447643424.post-66244108425231177542015-01-25T04:48:00.000-05:002015-02-19T16:11:24.091-05:00Basic PsyOps Protocol<a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/green-acres.png"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/green-acres-300x200.png" alt="green-acres" width="200" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-10443" /></a>In my 'survival kit', I have always had what I referred to as 'my rules'. They were the way of compartmentalizing experiences into categories and approaches. It required my recognition of my experience and the recognition of the reaction of people to hearing of my experience. <br/><br/>Everyone knew Oliver Douglas was perfectly sane while everyone else in Hooterville was "not". I knew what it was like to be "a sane man in an insane situation". If you want the experience, discuss <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arnold_Ziffel" target="_blank">Arnold Ziffel</a> with someone from Hooterville and THEN with someone who is NOT from there.<br/><br/>This morning, I stumbled upon the scholarly journals which not only put a more 'polite' description and definition to the categories (without expletives - but me loves my expletives sometimes) BUT reviewing the educated categorical definitions and aspects showed that those aspects were specifically being targeted by those who were seeking to undermine and destroy me.<br/><br/>I never would have put the sentence together as was done in prolly the most violent episode of BANSHEE. It'd be kind of arrogant and that is not my style. It would also suggest that my actions were calculated in some way. I did what I did because of who I am... and out of necessity. There were no survival guides. I did immediately recognize "it" as soon as Antony Starr said it. <br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/A-Starr-in-the-making.jpg"><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/A-Starr-in-the-making-300x144.jpg" alt="A-Starr-in-the-making" width="300" height="144" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-10438" /></a><br/>"Basic Psy Ops protocol. The only way to overcome a physical advantage is to establish a psychological one." <br/><br/>I suppose that was what I did. However, I had called it "Mindfuck me and I will mindfuck you right back, mothafukkah." Their team may have been bigger and better equipped, but I knew everything. They only knew their part. TRUTH was on my side. TRUTH is powerful - when YOU know the difference between truth and non-truth. TRUTH is a definite psychological advantage. <br/><br/>One sentence recognized and defined the situation early on and guided my survival through the last 10 years. It applied to everything. The TRUTH of the entire experience. "I am a sane man dealing with an absolutely insane situation. Every person in a position to help has acted improperly in direct violation of procedures and the law preventing the resolution of any matter… they each make the situation worse… NO ONE HELPED."<br/><br/>Every scholarly paper seems to indicate, albeit in hindsight, that I was on the path to discovering the RULE 1.6 INJUSTICE all along. <br/><br/>Everyone should insist on being treated fairly - to stand up for our rights without violating the rights of others by tactfully, justly and effectively expressing our experience, opinions and feelings. <br/><br/>JUSTICE IS COMING.<br/><br/><center><table width=75%><tr><td>I will present some of the 'scholarly' info in a later post. I have not posted them here because they all have a major shortcoming. The articles neglect one area. When the psychological information is used in efforts to undermine a target. The PsyOps part of the information. It kind of blew me away to see it documented and summarized where the items read like a laundry list of actions which effectively undermine a person psychologically.</td></tr></table></center>Terancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8495349982447643424.post-51569060153399593692015-01-24T09:37:00.000-05:002015-02-19T16:11:24.068-05:00Federal Crimes: Neglect of Constitutional Challenge<table><tr><td>There is no Rule 1.6 exception available in any of the following definitions of federal crimes.</td></tr></table><br/><br/><br/><br/>18 U.S.C. Section 1. <br/>“Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason.” U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 .Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)<br/><br/>“Any judge or attorney who does not report such judges for treason as required by law may themselves be guilty of misprison of treason,” 18 U.S.C. Section 2382.<br/><br/>"Obviously a judgment, though final and on the merits, has no binding force and is subject to collateral attack if it is wholly void for lack of jurisdiction of the subject matter or person, and perhaps for excess of jurisdiction, or where it is obtained by extrinsic fraud. [Citations.]" (7 Witkin, Cal. Procedure, supra, Judgment, § 286, p. 828.).<br/><br/>Another federal statute permits any citizen to file a lawsuit in the federal courts to obtain a court order requiring a federal official to perform a mandatory duty and to halt unlawful acts. This statute is Title 28 U.S.C. § 1361. <br/><br/>Title 28 U.S.C. § 1361. <br/>Action to compel an officer of the United States to perform his duty. The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff.<br/><br/>This is one of the most important tools to fight corruption in government offices that is immunized by the mob mentality of the system. The federal crime reporting statute requires anyone knowing of a federal crime to promptly report it to a federal court (or other federal officer), and requires federal judges to receive that information and any evidence, as part of his administrative duties. (The judge has no immunity for misconduct related to this administrative requirement).<br/><br/>Title 18 U.S.C. § 2. Principals. <br/>(a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal. <br/>(b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.Note: The legislative intent to punish as a principal not only one who directly commits an offense and one who "aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures" another to commit an offense, but also anyone who causes the doing of an act which if done by him directly would render him guilty of an offense against the United States. Case law decisions: Rothenburg v. United States, 1918, 38 S.Ct. 18, 245 U.S. 480, 62 L.Ed. 414, and United States v. Giles, 1937, 57 S.Ct. 340, 300 U.S. 41, 81 L.Ed. 493.<br/><br/>Title 18 U.S.C. § 3. Accessory after the fact. <br/>Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States had been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.<br/><br/>Title 18 U.S.C. § 4 (misprision of felony). <br/>Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.<br/><br/>Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983. <br/>Every person who, under color or any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of any State of Territory, subjects ... any citizen of the United States ... to the deprivation of any rights, privileges or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.<br/><br/>Title 42 U.S.C § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights <br/>(1) Preventing officer from performing duty. If two or more persons ... conspire to prevent ... any person from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof; or to injure him in his person or property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official duties. <br/><br/>(2) Obstructing justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror. If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to deter, by force, intimidation, or threat, any party or witness in any court of the United States from attending such court, or from testifying to any matter pending therein, freely, fully, and truthfully, or to injure such party or witness in his person or property on account of his having so attended or testified, or to influence the verdict, presentment, or indictment of any grand or petit juror in any such court, or to injure such juror in his person or property on account of any verdict, presentment, or indictment lawfully assented to by him, or of his being or having been such juror; or if two or more persons conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the law, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws; <br/><br/>(3) Depriving persons of rights or privileges. If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire, or go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another, for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws, or for the purpose of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of any State or Territory from giving or securing to all persons within such State or Territory the equal protection of the laws; ... or to injure any citizen in person or property on account of such support or advocacy; in any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages, occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators.<br/><br/>Title 42 U.S.C. § 1985 pertains to a conspiracy to interfere with civil rights, <br/>(1) to prevent an officer from performing a duty; <br/>(2) obstructing justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror; <br/>(3) or depriving persons of rights or privileges.<br/><br/>Title 42 U.S.C. § 1986. Action for neglect to prevent conspiracy<br/>Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned in the preceding section [42 USCS § 1985], are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses to do so, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented; and such damages may be recovered in an action on the case; and any number of persons guilty of such wrongful neglect or refusal may be joined as defendants in the action, and if the death of any party be caused by any such wrongful act and neglect, the legal representatives of the deceased shall have such action therefore, and may recover not exceeding five thousand dollars damages therein, for the benefit of the widow of the deceased, if there be one, and if there be no widow, then for the benefit of the next of kin of the deceased. But no action under the provisions of this section shall be sustained which is not commenced within one year after the cause of action has accrued.<br/><br/>In Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) the Supreme Court addressed the availability of a cause of action directly under the Constitution in Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. 678 (1946), in which damages were sought against Federal Bureau of Investigation agents for violation of fourth and fifth amendment rights. The Supreme Court held that "where the complaint, as here, is so drawn as to seek recovery directly under the Constitution or laws of the United States, the federal court must entertain the suit. Id. at 681-82. "Where federally protected rights have been invaded, it has been the rule from the beginning that courts will be alert to adjust their remedies so as to grant the necessary relief." Id. at 684."<br/><br/>Misprision: the deliberate concealment of one's knowledge of a treasonable act or a felony.<br/><br/>18 U.S. Code § 2382 - Misprision of Treason<br/>Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.<br/><br/><br/>SO IT BEGS THE QUESTION.... Why has every member of the United States Government who has been notified of the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 failed to take any action? Is it a demonstration of the usurpation of all government authority by a judiciary held hostage by the American Bar Association.Terancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8495349982447643424.post-32338328601282409422015-01-21T15:11:00.000-05:002015-02-19T16:11:24.008-05:00The Penalty for Treason is DeathCarolyn Tornetta Carluccio has acted with deliberate intent and malice in clear absence of jurisdiction. An act of treason which causes all those who enforce her corrupted orders to be guilty of the same crime and the obstruction and denial of constitutionally protected rights.<br/><br/>All those who act to conceal her corruption are active participants in a conspiracy to deny constitutionally protected rights. Even where it is her husband acting under the improper authority of a former Supreme Court Justice.<br/><br/>Ignoring her crimes any further is an injustice which no individual should have to endure and survive.<br/><br/>Even where the Attorney General has been improperly ordered to ignore the law and the criminal corruption of the judiciary.<br/><br/>Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio deserves to die. <br/><em><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/CarlCamp.jpg">She said so herself when campaigning for the position of judge.</a></em><br/><a href="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/carlucci_montco.pdf">Philadelphia Inquirer Judicial Campaign Questionnaire</a><br/><br/><img src="http://work2bdone.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/NoLaw-copy.jpg" alt="THIS IS NOT A DEATH THREAT ANYMORE THAN ANYONE WHO POSTS TO THE INTERNET FOR THE DEATH OF ANY REPORTED OFFENDER. THIS IS NOT A DEATH THREAT AGAINST A JUDGE. AS CARLUCCIO WAS NOT ACTING AS A JUDGE WHEN SHE ISSUED HER ORDER FOR WHICH SHE ALSO LACKS JUDICIAL IMMUNITY." width="360" height="291" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6871" /><br/><br/><center><table width=80%><tr><td>UPDATE: On January 23, 2015 at approx. 3PM two detectives stopped by my mother's home. Their approach was confirming, non-confrontational, non-aggressive, and they were cognizant that the post above was not a threat and was not intended to be a threat. They acknowledged the selection of the words used being deliberate and non-threatening.<br/><br/>They did not indicate who contacted them with concerns about the post.<br/><br/>They indicated they were in the area and thought they would 'check-in' and confirm my perseverance and continuing lawful efforts and approach. I found them to be sincere and invited them to witness the volume of paperwork involved. The paperwork continues.<br/><br/>One of the detectives had identified himself as the detective introduced a few years ago by Nancy Becker, Montgomery County Recorder of Deeds, with her recommendation that the fraudulent conveyance of my home and property be investigated and prosecuted. The detective contacted me about a week later indicating that the District Attorney had instructed him to take no action in the crime.</tr></td></table></center>Terancehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12699016974031792735noreply@blogger.com0