Every. Person. Matters. War on INJUSTICE.

Excuse me. Um. I think I am lost. Do you enjoy destroying people? I just want to understand. I want to know what drives a person to do what you do. To ruin other people's lives...
... because you have taken everything from me. Abuse of Power under Color of Law... which lead me to THAT LAW which perverts justice and undermines the entire government.

You have manipulated a very strong team to assist you in your efforts which violate the Public Trust and is concealed. You have ripped the head off of Justice and shit down her throat.

You fail to understand. EVERY. PERSON. MATTERS. There are more of us than there are of you.

Rule 1.6 provides the ability to conceal the abuse of power under color of law. The unconstitutional nullity is NO LAW... and NO SECRET... anymore.

You are the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION. An organization which interferes and intervenes to cause injustice and prevent any escape. A membership which has intruded and intercepted at every level of the judiciary to perpetrate unconstitutional acts while concealed behind a judiciary held hostage. There are more of us than there are of you.

The actions of the ABA membership to prevent JUSTICE are exposed. Two secret orders from unidentified courts which silence and prevent Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane from the responsibilities and duties of her office will not stop an awareness of the corruption caused and concealed by RULE 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION of the Rules of Professional Conduct - a minimum ethical standard which lack any ethics - permitting non-disclosure in the furtherance of fraud or to prevent resolution. INJUSTICE endorsed by SILENCE. A Mandatory Silence.

Rule 1.6 is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. JUSTICE IS COMING.

---

"I’ve seen it happen numerous times and I marvel at how the “bully” doesn’t see it."

"a person who spends his/her professional life figuring how to [screw] others…”

"a seasoned veteran of investigations and multi-faceted prosecutions that take months, if not years, to build, and hundreds of hours to prepare)" - with a twisted and perverted sense of paranoia because their injustice has been excused.

EXPOSED. "What is in doubt is how badly, and what the fallout will be."

"Career lawmen think strategically. They don’t go for the immediate gratification of a personal attack, instead preferring to set the board up just right and striking at the precise moment where the object of the attack cannot recover."

"I’ve witnessed a long line of politicians who have picked fights like this for short term personal or political benefit. I can’t recall any that have managed to avoid being hurt far more seriously for having done so."

"The moral: don’t pick a political fight against someone schooled in how to really hurt you."

There are more of us than there are of you.

The weapon of injustice, Rule 1.6, is revealed. An unconstitutional, improper, manipulative fraud. Repugnant to the principles and beliefs upon which the United States was founded.

Every. Person. Matters.

Every. Person. Matters. JUSTICE IS COMING.

---

The Quotes come from a manifesto written by an apparently angry and frightened man upon learning his efforts to undermine an attorney general had a setback. A prosecutor for 22 years, including two terms as District Attorney, who has served as President of the Pennsylvania District Attorneys Association, Bruce Castor believes he has attained a sterling reputation for pursuing truth, justice, and accountability in public office. He is the only person who believes his lie.

Castor was Montgomery County District Attorney when A Terroristic Divorce was initiated in 2007. It seems every oerson to whom I turned for help were the ones who were already working to destroy me - unable to tell the truth - unable to end my terror. Because of an unconstitutional law which prevented them from doing the right thing. EVER.

Unconstitutional Nullity: Peek-a-boo... Justice is Coming

Freedom is IMPORTANT. Constitutional rights are IMPORTANT.

If your solution violates either My Freedom or the US Constitution, then YOU have some more work to do.

Freedoms and Rights can coexist.

Once permitted to infringe upon each other, it is a slippery slope.
(OY! I hate cliche's but no better choice there.)

I am grateful for the effort by the founders of the US, because in today's 140 char or less environment they would never have been allowed to think in a broad sense which permits freedom and rights to co-exist.

Their archived papers and documents explained the basis for their decisions, and the aspects which they wrestled with to come to the decision. They exerted considerably more thought while founding the American Government than people expect. It was not haphazard. Decisions were not reached by exhausting the person who did not agree. Only one known and argued issue seems to have been conceded while it left the government at risk.

One issue which was a necessity left a loophole in the separation of powers. They did foresee the problem, but did not imagine that it would ever occur. They got it wrong. Very wrong.

By permitting the Judicial branch to self-police, the administration of justice, and the independence of the judiciary and the reasons which necessitated absolute judicial immunity all pivoted on one point of failure - THE PUBLIC TRUST.

The Public Trust in the judiciary is mandated by law. Respect towards the judicial branch is mandated by law.

The courts were open rooms in the centers of towns. Justice was transparent and open to the public. The public could witness proceedings. When necessary, where the trust placed in the judiciary was violated, the public would remove a judge from office. Occasionally by hanging. Justice was swift. Violations of the Public Trust could not be permitted to continue and erode the entire system of justice and government..

It was this type of violation of the public trust which endorsed and enabled apartheid to persist in South Africa. Their judiciary jailed the outspoken without regard for their own injustice.

When South Africa wrote their new Constitution in the 90's, they made certain that the judicial branch was accountable to the people and the Executive and Legislative branches of government, and not just to the judicial branch. They recognized the problem which existed in the US, once corrupted the judiciary find justice in permitting injustice to continue.


THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT
(because trust, honor and respect is mandated by law)

The judiciary did not recognize Rule 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION for the pervasive corruption it would permit, cause, enable and conceal.

Once under the control of Rule 1.6, with the leverage of exposing the violation of the public trust concealed by the judiciary, the American Bar Association had effectively usurped the authority and independence of the judiciary. The ABA then manipulated the authority of the courts over lawyers and legal professionals, even in other branches of government. Where Rule 1.6 expanded to affect federal lawyers, Rule 1.6 undermined the jurisdiction and authority of the Federal Government to act to address corruption within the state. Rule 1.6 required active participation in the conspiracy and the injustice.

The McDade Murtha Amendment which prevents the exposure of Rule 1.6 by government lawyers was enacted against the objections of several US Attorneys General, and DOJ officials. It would have been so simple had they only informed the Congress of the central issue. Applying the ethical standard enacted within the state to all government lawyers would cause considerable damage to the government.

The Rules of Professional Conduct lacked ethics, permitted fraud and the efforts to conceal fraud and prevent resolution. The US Congress never checked to see if the state ethics laws were ethical. Pennsylvania describes the Rules as a minimal ethical standard. Minimal is none. Points for not lying about the law which would require their silence about the corruption it would cause.

Did the state law, Rule 1.6 prevent exposing that state ethics laws lacked ethics? even where the country was about to mandate all government attorneys to follow the 'Rules' within the respective state where they were investigating and working? even where it denied constitutionally protected rights?

Apparently, the lawyers who foreclosed upon over 48 million homes using fraudulent and forged robo-signed documents were confident that their corruption of the authority of the judiciary had been successful.

The big injustices, the little injustices all combine to create a sense of national urgency. Injustice is occurring across the country. The US Constitution is being ignored. One law enacted in every state affects every case secretly, confidentially. Promotion to law was begun in 1984, generations of lawyers find this 'acceptable' because they were mandated to conceal the problem if they discovered it. Trained to perceive Rule 1.6 as attorney-client privilege, and neglecting the affect on the law, justice and the judiciary.... even while it undermined and usurped the authority of the other branches of government.

When recognized by PA Attorney General Kathleen Kane, an unconstitutional law would not be effective to silence her, The courts issues several secret court orders. AG Kane is silenced while those corrupt orders are under appeal.... and while it undermines the constitutional rights of every American.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 removes an unconstitutional law and restores justice to the entire country. Discovered by victims of injustice with standing to address the unconstitutional effect of the 'law'. Without the assistance, or cooperation, of any legal professional or member of the American Bar Association and affiliated organizations formed in every jurisdiction at every level of state and federal courts.

Hindered from the effort by legal professionals within the state and federal government mandated to follow the unconstitutional law, the government lawyers knew better and cannot be excused from damages and repartations for their participation in the denial of the rule of law and prevention of rights secures by the US Constitution.

Did those secret court orders require Kathleen Kane to file for divorce in an attempt to secure her personal assets? Is that why those lawyers are representing 'the person' Kathleen Kane (and not the Office of the Attorneyh General)?

The laws work when not prevented by an unconstitutional requirement to conceal injustice in every state and federally.

If your solution violates either My Freedom or the US Constitution, then you have some more work to do.

If their defense is that they were following the law, then they need to recall that an unconstitutional law is no law, a nullity, as if it never existed. It can no longer be obstructed by an unconstitutional law mandating non-disclosure and confidentiality and participation in a conspiracy to deny constitutional rights.


A nullity cannot conceal a nullity.

A nullity cannot justify or excuse a nullity.

PEEK-a-Boo... JUSTICE IS COMING.

Peek-a-boo Pennsylvania!

Governor Wolf and the Legislature can act now, or after a federal lawsuit is filed against them?

Those who know better ought to know better than to continue their participation in a conspiracy to deny the constitutional rights of every American in every state. EVERY PERSON MATTERS.

Pwennsylvania, whatcha gonna do?

Basic PsyOps Protocol

In my 'survival kit', I have always had what I referred to as 'my rules'. They were the way of compartmentalizing experiences into categories and approaches. It required my recognition of my experience and the recognition of the reaction of people to hearing of my experience.

Everyone knew Oliver Douglas was perfectly sane while everyone else in Hooterville was "not". I knew what it was like to be "a sane man in an insane situation". If you want the experience, discuss Arnold Ziffel with someone from Hooterville and THEN with someone who is NOT from there.

This morning, I stumbled upon the scholarly journals which not only put a more 'polite' description and definition to the categories (without expletives - but me loves my expletives sometimes) BUT reviewing the educated categorical definitions and aspects showed that those aspects were specifically being targeted by those who were seeking to undermine and destroy me.

I never would have put the sentence together as was done in prolly the most violent episode of BANSHEE. It'd be kind of arrogant and that is not my style. It would also suggest that my actions were calculated in some way. I did what I did because of who I am... and out of necessity. There were no survival guides. I did immediately recognize "it" as soon as Antony Starr said it.

"Basic Psy Ops protocol. The only way to overcome a physical advantage is to establish a psychological one."

I suppose that was what I did. However, I had called it "Mindfuck me and I will mindfuck you right back, mothafukkah." Their team may have been bigger and better equipped, but I knew everything. They only knew their part. TRUTH was on my side. TRUTH is powerful - when YOU know the difference between truth and non-truth. TRUTH is a definite psychological advantage.

One sentence recognized and defined the situation early on and guided my survival through the last 10 years. It applied to everything. The TRUTH of the entire experience. "I am a sane man dealing with an absolutely insane situation. Every person in a position to help has acted improperly in direct violation of procedures and the law preventing the resolution of any matter… they each make the situation worse… NO ONE HELPED."

Every scholarly paper seems to indicate, albeit in hindsight, that I was on the path to discovering the RULE 1.6 INJUSTICE all along.

Everyone should insist on being treated fairly - to stand up for our rights without violating the rights of others by tactfully, justly and effectively expressing our experience, opinions and feelings.

JUSTICE IS COMING.

I will present some of the 'scholarly' info in a later post. I have not posted them here because they all have a major shortcoming. The articles neglect one area. When the psychological information is used in efforts to undermine a target. The PsyOps part of the information. It kind of blew me away to see it documented and summarized where the items read like a laundry list of actions which effectively undermine a person psychologically.

My Grown-up Christmas List

My kids remember me.
They sat upon my knee.
I am their Dad.
They can't take that from me

They have grown up now.
But Alienated ...and HOW?
Divorce, Custody
Family Court Brutality

Here's my life long wish
Most Sincere Christmas List
For parents and children
and broken family

No more lives torn apart
That wars would never start
And time would heal all hearts
And everyone would have a friend
And right would always win
And love would never end

This is my grown up Christmas list.

JUSTICE IS COMING.

"There is love in this room. Can you feel it?
Love is in this room. Can you feel it?
Love for a father. Love for a mother.
Love for a brother too.
Absolutely. Not Maybe.
There will always be love in this room."

This was what Christmas at Home looked like before the corrupt careless judge threw our family through the shredder and our memories went in the trash. Why do good people trust the judicial system? Because they have no idea of the injustice and corruption which feeds on divorce and custody.

... and they have no idea how a LAW in every state causes every corrupt lawless and criminal act to be concealed, non-disclosed and confidential.

To the Pennsylvania Supreme Court

Terance Healy, Appellant, appeals to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania from a Memorandum unsigned by any judge filed with the Superior Court on October 27, 2014.

Where a “decision” was rendered without proper consideration of any facts;

Where a “decision” was rendered without submission of briefs;

Where a “decision" was rendered outside of established laws neglecting all procedures within the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure (Title 210) and the Operating Procedures of the Superior Court (Title 65);

Where a “decision” was produced based on fraud
which was intended to conceal the prior fraud of the lower court
which has obstructed, denied and prevented the Appeal
of a deliberately and intentionally procedurally defective and void order issued on May 9, 2011
while denying the constitutional rights of a litigant
terrorized by litigation within the lower court
which can be demonstrated to have been a FARCE
–
an injustice so egregious and incomprehensible that persisted for 7 years demonstrating abuse of power under color of law with intent to cause harm and emotional distress
executed by the entire Judiciary of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas
which FAILED to secure it's only determinable and true objective
- the suicide of a litigant.

GET READY FOR MR HEALY's WILD RIDE!... and the story of a billion dollar lawsuit to be filed as soon as a litigant's constitutional rights are restored

As I told the American Bar Association in 2013.
I KNOW WHAT YOU HAVE DONE.
I AM COMING FOR MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
JUSTICE IS COMING.

I'm bringing the American People with me...
No, they are NOT pleased with what you have done to our country...

I DEMAND AND ASSERT MY RIGHTS...

I have proven that the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas was undone by the actions of the entire judiciary to conceal the crime of one judge - a multi-year series of unstoppable abuses of power under color of law with intent to cause emotional harm and distress while denying constitutional rights and the equal protection under the law.

I have proven that the Superior Court of Pennsylvania has been infiltrated by the various bar associations to interfere with the administration of justice in the process of denying constitutionally protected rights and preventing the equal protection of the law.

I have notified the Superior Court of these actions and they have taken no action to address that their authority has been usurped and their administration has been undermined. They hide behind and protect their captors.

The disrepect and discourtesy by the office staff of the President Judge of the Superior Court demonstrates a court held hostage from the truth and information hiding from the issues affecting the courts and the litigants who come before the court.

Judge Gantmann does not deserve the respect of the cover letter which had been prepared for her indicating the problems which has intercepted the authority of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

I have once again presented the facts to a member of the Pennsylvania Legislature as the only organization which may take lawful action to end this all-consuming tempest of injustice which has undermined and usurped the judicial branch.

I await prosecution for the federal and state crimes and the immediate return of my property stolen assigning sanctions, compensation and restitution.

The taxpayers of Montgomery County may be interested to learn how the resources of the county are illegally and improperly utilized to terrorize and harass the citizens of the county at the direction of a corrupt judge and an incompetent lawyer.

The insurance companies who participated in meetings where my demise was the selected resolution may want to start thinking in millions per month of terror, double after improper incarceration, tripled after the destruction of all personal property, with financial consideration added for every holiday where I have been left homeless and alone. Their goal was my suicide, and they pushed without mercy to the very brink. They failed.

As for the judge who indicated in her campaign that the punishment should fit the crime. Take her job, friends and family away. Prevent access to her children. Remove her from her home, and throw away all of her possessions, then continue to push her to suicide for years... let's see how she fares.

The prosecution phase is being prepared for delivery to the proper authorities.

JUSTICE IS COMING.

What Changed?

After Watergate, the legal profession looked somewhat foolish because the lawyers did not understand who they represented, who they worked for and who they thought they were committing crimes on behalf of. As a result, several went to jail. The American Bar Association realized they had a problem. An ethics problem.... or lack of ethics problem.

The ABA set out to fix their ethics problem by codifying (MAKING LAW) of their Code of Conduct. To sell the concept, they called it 'ethics', BUT, the Model Rules of Professional Conduct are not ethical or moral. They are not even lawful. They ARE unconstitutional.

Previously, it was 'code' without legal teeth to enforce it. AS LAW, there was an aggressively enforced mandated for non-disclosure... which even went as far as preventing lawyers (District Attorneys, Attorneys general, US Attorneys) from prosecuting crimes. Everything pointed to ONE RULE enacted in every state which controlled the state and federal governments involvement, and denied the constitutional rights of the people who likely felt violated but never understood what happened to them or why. They made the 'discretionary' decision, into a mandate of non-disclosure. The difference between code and LAW.

Taking the Canons which had been practiced for hundreds of years, and merging them with the Code Of Conduct was the responsibility of the Kutak Commission. It took years to accomplish, but in the EARLY 80'S, the Model Rules of professional Conduct were presented to the American Bar Association Conference of Delegates - the ABA's pretend government.

At the loud, vocal, open insistence of over 2/3 of the Conference, the lawyers decided to make fraud legal. They called it ethical. While they focused on protecting their 'client fraud', Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information also prevented disclosure in a far broader spectrum of incidences.

THIS IS WELL DOCUMENTED. THEY DID IT ANYWAY.
On Ethics and Expediency: The ABA's Dubious Vote on Disclosure of Client Fraud by Charles E. Lundberg March-April 1983

THE ABA MADE FRAUD LEGAL AND CALL IT ETHICAL... but only for lawyers, and their clients... without any disclosure of who was responsible for the fraud. The standard exceptions demonstrate a sociopathic and self-indulgent psychosis.

1. Where the victim would be killed, the lawyer had 'discretion' to reveal the information. Sadistically keeping a victim on the line for further frauds. (I call this INTENT TO CAUSE SUICIDE.)
- or -
2. Where the lawyer was not compensated for his 'work'.

The ABA then proceeded to have each state supreme court enact their Model Rules into LAW. Starting in 1984 in New Jersey through 2009 in Maine, Fraud became legal Disclosure of the truth became illegal. Rule 1.6 was aggressively enforced by the state Supreme courts.

The states saw it for what it was AND ENACTED IT INTO LAW ANYWAY. With occasional exceptions added, but none which made the LAW ethical, moral or constitutional. How could they make fraud ethical? legal? As code it was discretionary - the good ole boy network - but as LAW everything changed.

Calling it Attorney Client privilege, lawyers would assert it and giggle through millions of foreclosures while neglecting the FACT that the constitutional rights of the innocent victim had been denied, and prevented from any recourse. Those who survived were left destitute, homeless and suicidal.

Rule 1.6 makes it ILLEGAL for a lawyer to disclose what happened.

Additionally, anyone addressing the unconstitutional affect on their rights, would have to pursue it through the judiciary, who enacted the unconstitutional law, who protected their 'integrity', whose shameful failure would allow and destroy millions in foreclosures, and thousands in Kids For Cash.

There are not many terrorized souls who have the wherewithal to find and prove the violation of their Constitutional Rights.

It's not easy to live, let alone litigate when you have NO RIGHTS, NO PROTECTION OF THE LAW., AND NO ESCAPE. The header of the web site indicates the situation where someone has lost their constitutionally protected rights.

I am a sane man dealing with an absolutely insane situation. Every person in a position to help has acted improperly in direct violation of procedures and the law preventing the resolution of any matter… they each make the situation worse… NO ONE HELPED… NO ONE COULD HELP.

The only difference. They pressed for a suicide that I could not deliver. As a result, I found the needle in the haystack of injustice. The subsequent response of the judiciary demonstrates their loss of judicial independence. Further demonstrating the corruption of EVERY state and federal judiciary. They conceal that they had allowed themselves to become UNDONE.

A problem such as this could be resolved within minutes when the public learned what had occurred...

The media black out of the story demonstrates a very strong controlling power by the ABA. Fraud is legal for lawyers, and that is a tool they use to prevent their exposure.

The US Constitution is stronger. JUSTICE IS COMING.

---

KATHLEEN KANE. My patience with your inaction is running thin. Do your job.

There is not one government official doing anything to preserve, protect, support, defend, or enforce the US Constitution.

Why bother to take an oath if you are mandated to ignore it? MMM YEA... Lawyers are allowed to commit fraud.

Follow your oath, or RESIGN.

Recommended Reading

Part of the Bibliography in the next filing - this about 50% of the documents studied for the information presented on this site.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

The following journal articles, documents and collateral information are presented as reference resources which have contributed to the review, study and presentation within this document.

The documents include demonstrations of the intentional carelessness and deception, and also the tactics of disinformation which conceal their actions from within and without.

( FYI, this is the difference between following the scripts into corruption... and understanding the law... and recognizing the perversion which undermined the judiciary. )

JUSTICE IS COMING.

If you want to do something evil, do it inside something boring... INDEED.

---

PROFESSIONAL SECRECY AND ITS EXCEPTIONS: Spaulding V. Zimmerman Revisited
Roger C. Cramton and Lori P. Knowles, 83 Minn. L. Rev. 63 (1998)
Download

PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYER: The Three Hardest Questions
Monroe H. Freedman, 64 Mich. L. Rev. 1469 (1966)
Download

WHAT WE TALKED ABOUT WHEN WE TALKED ABOUT ETHICS: A Critical View of the Model Rules
Stephen Gillers, , 46 Ohio St. L.J. 243 (1985)
Download

RECTIFICATION OF CLIENT FRAUD: Death and Revival of a Professional Norm
Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr., 33 Emory L.J. 271 (1984)
Download

ON LEARNING OF A CORPORATE CLIENT'S CRIME OR FRAUD
Junious Hoffman, 3 Bus. Law. 1389 (1978)
Download

THE LAW BETWEEN THE BAR AND THE STATE
Susan P. Koniak, 70 N.C.L. Rev. 1389 (1992)
Download

THE CENTRAL MORAL TRADITION OF LAWYERING
Robert P. Lawry, 19 Hofstra L. Rev. 311 (1990)
Download

CONFIDENTIALITY AND THE DANGEROUS PATIENT: Implications of Tarasoff for Psychiatrists and Lawyers
Vanessa Merton, 31 Emory L. Rev. 263 (1982)
Download

THE LAWYER’S ALLEGIANCE: Priorities Regarding Confidentiality
R.W. Nahstoll, 41 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 421 (1984)
Download

THE FUTURE CRIME OR TORT EXCEPTION TO COMMUNICATION PRIVILEGES
Harvard Note, 77 Harv. L. Rev. 730 (1964)
Download

THE NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AND THE NEW MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT: Blowing the Whistle and Waving the Red Flag
Ronald R. Rotunda, 63 Ore. L. Rev. 455 (1984)
Download

PROFESSIONALISM AS BAR POLITICS: The Making of the Rules of Professional Conduct
Ted Schneyer, 14 Law & Social Inquiry 677 (1989)
Download

THE LAWYER AS SUPEREGO: Disclosure of Client Confidences to Prevent Harm
Harry I. Subin, 70 Iowa L. Rev. 1091 (1985)
Download

CLIENT CONFIDENCE AND THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY: Too Little Consensus and Too Much Confusion
Harris Weinstein, 35 S. Texas L .Rev. 727 (1994)
Download

REVISING THE ETHICAL RULES OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY: Towards a New Discretionary Rule
Limor Zer-Gutman, 45 Loyola L. Rev. 669, 681 (1999)
Download

SCHAFER'S DILEMMA: Client Confidentiality vs. Judicial Integrity -- A Very Different Proposal for the Revision of Model Rule 1.6
LaRue T. Hosmer and Daniel C. Powell, 49 Loyola L. Rev. 405-469 (2003)
Download

THE GEORGETOWN PROPOSALS
Harvey J. Pitt, 36 Bus. Law. 1831 (1981).
Download

THE KAYE SCHOLER AFFAIR: The Lawyer’s Duty of Candor and the Bar’s Temptations of Evasion and Apology
William L. Simon, 23 Law & Soc. Inquiry 243 (Spring, 1998)
Download

RETHINKING CONFIDENTIALITY II: Is Confidentiality Constitutional?
Fred C. Zacharias, 75 Iowa L. Rev 601 (March. 1990)
Download

RETHINKING CONFIDENTIALITY
Fred C. Zacharias, 74 Iowa L. Rev. 351 (January 1989)
Download

WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION: INTERIM FORMAL ETHICS OPINION Re: The Effect of the SEC's Sarbanes-Oxley Regulations on Washington Attorneys' Obligations Under the RPCs
Approved by Board of Governors July 26, 2003
Download

THE CONCEPT OF A RESTATEMENT OF THE LAW GOVERNING LAWYERS
Charles W. Wolfram, 1 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 199 1987-1`988
Download

PENNSYLVANIA LEGISLATOR'S MUNICIPAL DESKBOOK, Third Edition (2006)
Download

WORLD JUSTICE PROJECT INDEX REPORT 2012
Download

U.S. 7TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS REPORTS
IN RE A WITNESS, 288 F. 3d 289 (7th Cir. 2002)
Decided April 23, 2002
Download

WISCONSIN RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT FOR ATTORNEYS
November 14, 2001
Download

WHOSE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT SHOULD GOVERN LAWYERS IN FEDERAL COURT AND HOW SHOULD THE RULES BE CREATED
Bruce A. Green, 64 Geo. Wash L. Rev. 460 (1995-1996)
Download

WHO ARE CENTRAL LEGAL STAFF – On the Effective Use Of Resources in Pennsylvania
Stephen J. McEwen, Jr – Court Review 1998
Download

WHEN CANARIES WON;T SING: The Failure of the Attorney Self-Reporting System in the “Cash For Kids” Scheme
Sarah L. Primrose, 36 J. Legal Prof. 139 (2011)
Download

WATCHING THE HENHOUSE: Judicial Rulemaking and Judicial Review
Carrie Leonetti, 91 Neb. L. Rev (2013)
Download

WASHINGTON STATE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
Adopted July 10, 2006 - Effective September 1, 2006
Download

WANT TO TAKE MY HOME? A Tale of David, the Homeowner, versus Goliath, the Bank
Eastburn & Gray, P.C. (2012)
Download

MAKING LAWYERS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TRUTH: The Influence of Marvin Frankel’s Proposal for Reforming the Adversary System
Daniel Walfish, J.D. 2004 Yale Law School
Download

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, United States of America v. John Doe PRECEDENTIAL, October 25, 2005
Download

TWENTY­FIVE WAYS TO SUPPRESS TRUTH: The Rules of Disinformation (Includes The 8 Traits of A Disinformationalist)
H. Michael Sweeney (2000) www.proparanoid.com
Download

Truth in Lawyering Act (“TILA”) - (Washington State) December 18, 2001
Download

THE VARYING PARAMETERS OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN AMERICAN CRIMINAL LAW
John F. Decker, 65 La. L. Rev. (2004)
Download

THE SEPARATE BUT UNEQUAL CONSTITUTION
Adam Lamparello and Charles MacLean, January 2014
Download

THE NEXT STEP IN LEGAL ETHICS: Some Observations About the Proposed Model Rules of Professional Conduct
Robert J. Kutak, 30 Cath. U. L. Rev. 1 (1981)
Download

THE KUTAK MODEL RULES V. THE AMERICAN LAWYER'S CODE OF CONDUCT
Monroe H. Freedman, 26 Vill. L. Rev. 1165 (1981)
Download

THE CLIENT-FRAUD DILEMMA: A NEED FOR CONSENSUS
Kenneth F. Krach, 46 Md. L. Rev. 436 (1987)
Download

COMPARATIVE ATTRIBUTES OF LEGAL STAFF IN INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURTS
Council of Chief Judges of the State Courts of Appeal, (April 2011)
Download

THE LEGALITY OF STATE PROTECTIONIST LAWS AGAINST LEGAL PROCESS OUTSOURCING
Anne J. Lee, J. ON TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L Vol. 11 (2013)
Download

".... IN THE SPIRIT OF PUBLIC SERVICE:" A Blueprint for the Rekindling of Lawyer Professionalism
American Bar Association , Commission on Professionalism, 1986
Download

OVERSTEPPING ETHICAL BOUNDARIES? LIMITATIONS ON STATE EFFORTS TO PROVIDE
ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN FAMILY COURTS
Jessica Dixon Weaver, 82 F ORDHAM L. R EV . 2563 (2014).
Download

VALID RULE DUE PROCESS CHALLENGES: BOND v.
UNITED STATES AND ERIE’S CONSTITUTIONAL SOURCE
Kermit Roosevelt, III,, WILLIAM & MARY LAW REVIEW Vol. 54:987
Download

DISQUALIFYING JUDGES WHEN THEIR IMPARTIALITY MIGHT REASONABLY BE
QUESTIONED : MOVING BEYOND A FAILED STANDARD
Raymond J. McKoski, ARIZONA LAW REVIEW VOL. 56:411 (2014)
Download

IS CONFIDENTIALITY REALLY FOREVER---EVEN IF THE CLIENT DIES OR CEASES TO EXIST?
By Anne Klinefelter and Marc C. Laredo, Volume 40, No. 3 Litigation 47-51 (Spring, 2014)
Download

AGAINST CONFIDENTIALITY
Dru Stevenson ? 2014
Download

THINNING OUT STRUCTURAL THEORY
Garrick B. Pursley, (2014)
Download

THE PARADOX OF ADMINISTRATIVE PREEMPTION
David S. Rubenstein, (2014)
Download

DETERMINING THE PREEMPTIVE EFFECT OF FEDERAL LAW ON STATE STATUTES OF REPOSE
Adam Bain, University of Baltimore Law Review Vol. 43
Download

THE SUPREME COURT ’ S JURISDICTIONAL INFIDELITY
John David Ohlendorf , July 11, 2013
Download

HIDING BEHIND THE CLOAK OF INVISIBILITY : THE SUPREME COURT AND PER CURIAM OPINIONS
Ira P. Robbins, TULANE LAW REVIEW Vol. 86:1197 (2012)
Download

THE RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF THE LAW GOVERNING LAWYERS AND THE COURTS
1997 Symposium, The Professional Lawyer
Susan Martyn, (1997)
Download

HOW MUCH JUSTICE CAN WE AFFORD?: DEFINING THE COURTS’ ROLES AND DECIDING THE APPROPRIATE NUMBER OF TRIALS, SETTLEMENT SIGNALS, AND OTHER ELEMENTS NEEDED TO ADMINISTER JUSTICE
John Lande, JOURNAL OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION Vol. 2006
Download

SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY, THE SMITH ACT, AND PROSECUTION FOR RELIGIOUS SPEECH ADVOCATING THE VIOLENT OVERTHROW OF GOVERNMENT
John Alan Cohan, Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development: Vol. 17: Iss. 2, Article 2. (2003)
Download

SPECULUM JURIS VOLUME 25 PART 2 2011
Nelson Mandela School of Law, Faculty of Law Rhodes University (2011)
Download

VITAE REPUBLICAE – THE LIFE OF THE REPUBLIC – SHERIFF'S
Carson J. Tucker
Download

REVIVING A TRADITION OF SERVICE:
REDEFINING LAWYER PROFESSIONALISM IN THE 21 ST CENTURY
Ronald C. Minkoff, ABA Standing Committee on Professionalism. (2010)
Download

RESTORING CONSTITUTIONAL EQUILIBRIUM
Adam Lamparello, October 2014
Download

RECTIFICATION OF CLIENT FRAUD
Marcia A. Johnson, Director - Minnesota Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility
Bench & Bar of Minnesota (April 1993)
Download

SECTION 1983 LITIGATION
Martin A. Schwartz and Kathryn R. Urbonya, Federal Judicial Center 2008
RULES VERSUS STANDARDS: An Economic Analysis
Louis Kaplow, DUKE LAW JOURNAL Vol. 42:557
Download

KUTAK COMMISSION
Robert Kutak, 1977 – 1983
Download

“LAWYER AS PUBLIC CITIZEN” – A Futile Attempt to Close Pandora’s Box
Matthew E. Meany, 35 Campbell L. Rev. 119 (2012)
Download

STANDING OF INTERVENOR - Defendants in Public Law Litigation
Matthew I. Hall, 80 Fordham L. Rev. 1539 (2012).
Download

THE RULE OF LAW AS A LAW OF STANDARDS
JAMAL GREENE, 56 U. C HI . L. R EV . 1175, 1175 (1989)
Download

HOW LAWYERS ACT IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE
Monroe H. Freedman, 70 Fordham L. Rev. 1717 (2002)
Download

THE FINE PRINT, VOL. 1, NO. 3
Download

Students of the University of Georgia School of Law, Other Law School Publications. Paper 304 (1982)
Download

ATTORNEY PAPERS, HISTORY AND CONFIDENTIALITY: A Proposed Amendment to Model Rule 1.6
Patrick Shilling, 69 Fordham L. Rev. 2741 (2001)
Download

RULES AGAINST RULIFICATION
Michael Coenen, (2013)
Download

CONFLICT AND TRUST BETWEEN ATTORNEY AND CLIENT
Robert A. Burt, Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 796. (1981)
Download

LEGAL ETHICS: Discretion and Utility in Model Rule 1.6
Charles A. Kelbley, Fordham Urban Law Review Vol XIII (1984)
Download

CONSTITUTIONAL LITIGATION UNDER SECTION 1983 AND THE BIVENS DOCTRINE IN THE OCTOBER 2008 TERM
Martin A. Schwartz, Touro Law Review: Vol. 26: No. 2, Article 9 (2012)
Download

RULE 201. JUDICIAL NOTICE OF ADJUDICATIVE FACTS.
PA Code Article II Rule 201
Download

THE CONSTITUTION of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
112th Congress, (2013)
Download

FEDERAL USURPATION
FRANKLIN PIERCE , Family Guardian Fellowship (1908)
Download

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE: An Overview of Some of the Federal Statutes That Prohibit Interference with Judicial, Executive, or Legislative Activities
Charles Doyle, Congressional Research Service 7-5700 (2014)
Download

JUDICIAL SUPREMACY AND NONJUDICIAL INTERPRETATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL
Scott E. Gant, Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly Vol.24:359 (1997)
Download

HIDING BEHIND THE CLOAK OF INVISIBILITY : The Supreme Court And Per Curiam Opinions
Ira P. Robbins (2012)
Download

TOWARD A HISTORY OF THE LEGALIZATION OF AMERICAN LEGAL ETHICS – II The Modern Era
Charles W. Wolfram, 8 U. Chi. L. Sch. Roundtable 469 (2001)
Download

WHY KENTUCKY SHOULD ADOPT THE ABA'S MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
Eugene R. Gaetke, 74 Ky. L.J. 581 (1986)
Download

QUALIFICATIONS OF MONROE H. FREEDMAN AS AN EXPERT WITNESS ON LAWYERS ’ AND JUDGES ’ ETHICS
Monroe H. Freedman, Qualifications 2014
Download

HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT: Intersection And Integration
Martha F. Davis, School of Law Faculty Publications. Paper 162. (2010)
Download

HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT: Intersection And Integration
Martha F. Davis, COLUMBIA HUMAN RIGHTS LAW REVIEW 42:157 (2011)
Download

GIVING NEW MEANING TO “JUSTICE FOR ALL”: CRAFTING AN EXCEPTION TO ABSOLUTE JUDICIAL IMMUNITY
Brittney Kern , 2014 M ICH . S T . L. R EV . 149
Download

LAWYER-CLIENT CONFIDENCES: The Model Rules' Radical Assault on Tradition
Monroe H. Freedman, 68 American Bar Association Journal 428
Download

A CASE FOR INCREASED DISCLOSURE
Deborah Abramovsky, Fordham Urban Law Review Vol XIII (1984)
Download

AGAINST CONFIDENTIALITY
Dru Stevenson , Abstract (2014)
Download

THE SUPREME COURT AS A LEGISLATURE
Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr, Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 2407
Download

HOW FAR MAY A LAWYER GO IN ASSISTING A CLIENT IN LEGALLY WRONGFUL CONDUCT?
Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr., Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 2402. (1981)
Download

REVISITING THE SECOND RESTATEMENT OF JUDGMENTS: Issue Preclusion and Related Problems
Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr., Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 2404.
Download

RECTIFICATION OF CLIENT FRAUD: Death and Revival of a Professional Norm
Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr., Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 2396. (1984)
Download

PRECLUSION AS TO ISSUES OF LAW: The Legal System's Interest
Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr., Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 2397. (1984)
Download

RISING ABOVE PRINCIPLE
Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr., Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 2393. (1986)
Download

A LAWYER'S PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION IN PROFESSIONAL DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr., Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 2392. (1987)
Download

PROFESSIONALISM: The Deep Theory
Daniel R. Coquillette, North Carolina Law Review 72, (1994): 1271-1278. (1994)
Download

IN PRAISE OF OVERZEALOUS REPRESENTATION- Lying to Judges, Deceiving Third Parties, and Other Ethical Conduct
Monroe H. Freedman, (3 rd ed., 2004) (with Abbe Smith)
Download

FOUR PORTRAITS OF LAW PRACTICE
Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr., Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 2386.
Download

THE FUTURE OF LEGAL ETHICS
Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr., Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 2380.
Download

THE CLIENT FRAUD PROBLEM: A Justinian Quartet
Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr., Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 2370.
Download

STATE SUPREME COURT REGULATION OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS
Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr., Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 2365.
Download

IT’S NOT OVER: Empowering the Different Voice in Legal Academia
Elvia R. Arriola, 29 Berkeley J. Gender L. & Just. (2014).
Download

ex tenebris ad lucem

Where those who permit injustice while ignoring the rule of law and the principles contained in the Constitution are causing liberty to be in peril; holding justice hostage; undermining the essence of judicial independence; and usurping the authority of the judicial branch while concealing continued corruption by unethical, immoral and unscrupulous actions in the name of 'integrity',...

Every American has a responsibility to take action to preserve, protect, support and defend the integrity of the judiciary from any further jeopardy.

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct was improperly enacted by the state Supreme Court(s) when presented by the American Bar Association within their Model Rules of Professional Conduct causing the collateral, indirect, and absolute denial of rights secured and protected by the Constitution of the United States while denying and preventing any protection of the law to a litigant who has been the victim of fraud concealed from disclosure by every person, and organization, directly mandated to follow the Rules of Professional Conduct – who include all lawyers, all judges, and all law enforcement within each state, within each state government, and within the federal government.

By freeing the courts from a crippling shameful burden and further self-sabotage, we restore the integrity of the judiciary, reestablish authority and jurisdiction, and return the government provided by the Constitution of the United States to purpose: to establish justice, ensure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty for ourselves and our posterity.

By our own necessity, and on behalf of the People of the United States of America,
We respectfully and sincerely petition for your immediate attention and action.

PERSEVERE. JUSTICE IS COMING.

Those scripts... those hilarious scripts

The scripts which people find on the web are disinformation tactics. They are designed to convince you of the uselessness in combating 'the system' by presenting information to use while combating the system. Yea, see that complete shift in logic there. That's another clue.

The scripts include
The Sovereign Citizen
The Fringed Flag
The Corporation
The Law of Man
The New World Order
among others...

Usually identified because they use the same exact wording everytime, everywhere and they indicate nothing will ever work because 'THEY' don't follow the law based on the premise of the script.

The reason they exist is because the American Bar Association has seriously fucked up the state and federal judiciary so badly that they had to create distractions. Methods by which their unfortunate targets can quickly succumb to their fate/destination. The victims of judicial injustice/corruption end up in the target destinations which are 1) Homeless/Destitute 2) Incarcerated 3) Suicide

Bear in mind, the divide and hate tactics which blame sex, religion, age, nationality, race, personality, etc... are still often presented as the excuse for the injustice.

You may even encounter 'The Shill'. The person who purports to help by collecting your story and exposing the injustice to a larger audience. Their collection of horror stories will bring an end to the injustice. These folks never deliver.

There have been over 40 million fraudulent foreclosures in the US.
Kids for Cash affected thousands of children and their families.
There is no mercy. They have no shame. The system is affected. It is NOT personal and should not be taken personally - even though the system is annihilating you. Understanding it is NOT acceptance. Understanding it removes some of the emotion from your experience.

"God grant me the ability to change the things which I cannot accept."

Persevere. We will address the Constitutional Crisis. We know the cause and what must occur to restore rights and privileges protected by the US Constitution. As soon as THE PEOPLE learn what has occurred the problem will be resolved. Until that occurs, persevere.

JUSTICE IS COMING.

Click here for other Disinformation Techniques

Justice Is Coming.

Affirmations help purify our thoughts and restructure the dynamic of our brains so that we truly recognize that nothing is impossible.

I use several affirmations throughout every day in speaking, writing, and Facebook posts -- often when facing the continuing survival through the desperate moments that people are facing.

Less is more powerful.... when there is really nothing you can do or say to change the immediate circumstance, ... when a friends just needs to be acknowledged in a desperate moment.

I keep 'em short and often use them to close a web post, Facebook post or email.

(There are some folks who notice when I haven't used them... and they call it to my attention OR post themselves.)

JUSTICE IS COMING.

I PERSEVERE.

EVERY. PERSON. MATTERS.

PERSEVERE.

Judicial Overthrow of Legislative and Executive - Rule 1.6

Alexander Hamilton described the separation of powers...

The Executive not only dispenses the honors, but holds the sword of the community.

The Legislative not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated.

The Judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither FORCE NOR WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments.

---

Hamilton neglected to see how each state judiciary enacting a law could undermine the whole of the government. By enacting a law which mandates the silence of lawyers, aggressively enforcing THEIR law, and undermining the legislature through it's lawyer membership and the executive through it's governor/lawyers. By enacting a law which undermines constitutional rights, and the law, without proper authority where it affects the rights protected by the Constitution of the United states and the state Constitutions.

The Judicial Branch has demonstrated their power to undermine the Constitution of the United States, because they alone have the authority to decide what is constitutional and ignore when they violate constitutional rights.

This is not speculation. This is why the constitution and the rule of law are ignored in the united States. And lately, the judiciary committee is trying to silence the whole country.

The mistake was letting the judiciary make their law without review of the collateral impact of the opportunity for denial of constitutional rights, and of equal protection of the law.

Rule 1.6 undermined the government and mandated the confidentiality of lawyers (the legislative) and law enforcement (the executive branch). As the judiciary has the power of judgment, they have effectively usurped force, will and judgment. One law controls them all, and mandates their silence.

Quietly rolled out to each state from 1984 through 2009... and modified ONLY when it exposed their judicial corruption - leaving bread crumbs demonstrating intent. Only a legislature could stop the power shift. A a mandate of confidentiality and the shame of what the government had allowed to happen has kept every legislature silent.

The judiciary controls judgment, force and will - and aggressively attacks any challenge to their unconstitutional, unlawful and unjust actions.

The government is controlled within one organization - the American Bar Association, and it's pretend government structure. An effective silent overthrow of the United States...

Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional and is so REPUGNANT TO THE CONSTITUTION. IT IS A NULLITY. IT IS VOID AB INITIO.

JUSTICE IS COMING.

Kathleen Kane demonstrates restraint - Rule 1.6 as a weapon

Kathleen Kane's credibility is on the line - MORNING CALL July 5, 2014

Rule 1.6 is a law which mandates confidentiality of information. It's unconstitutional. it causes judges to sacrifice their integrity. It requires law enforcement to ignore corruption and injustice. Rule 1.6 mandates that Kathleen Kane not explain that it is being used by those who are well aware of it to attack her credibility where she is mandated to conceal their corruption and misconduct.

Rule 1.6 mandated confidentiality is a tool for corruption and injustice - and the denial of constitutional rights. The Kids For Cash scandal. The Sandusky Conspiracy. Foreclosure through fraud. All enabled, delayed, and ignored for years because of a mandate that lawyers and judges MUST ignore judicial corruption and injustice. Rule 1.6 demands that confidentiality from district attorneys and attorneys general.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 was undermined by a member of Kathleen Kane's office. His actions required the integrity of the federal courts to be sacrificed - made the courts deny the law and the constitution and prevented them from explaining. Because of Rule 1.6, Kathleen Kane can take no action to expose the case being undermined by her office.

The Weaponized version of Rule 1.6, seems to be the choice of the District Attorneys of Pennsylvania. They dare to attack the actions of the Pennsylvania Attorney General with the knowledge that she is not lawfully permitted to answer their statements. Seth Williams hired Frank Fina after Fina undermined his own investigation requiring the case to be dropped. Both know that Attorney General Kane is mandated to confidentiality when it would expose the misconduct of employees of the office of the Attorney General.

Same conditions with regard to the stalled Sandusky investigation which was delayed for years.
The Sandusky report was a sham... mandated by Rule 1.6 to not include misconduct of the investigation. The Supreme Court actually updated the Rules of Professional Conduct to conceal the emails - over 8 times they edited the law for the purpose of email confidentiality. BUT, Rule 1.6 prevents AG Kane from saying it. She must protect the integrity of a court which boldly and arrogantly lacks any shred of integrity. A Supreme court which hides behind a curtain of confidentiality THEY CREATED TO CONCEAL JUDICIAL CORRUPTION.

I have been victimized for over 9 years by injustice and corruption - no protection of the law and no constitutional rights. Homeless, destitute and terrorized to the point where I had to find out why they thought it was OK. Rule 1.6 makes it OK to ignore corruption, injustice and terrorism.

JUSTICE IS COMING. And while Kathleen Kane can't do anything to help because of Rule 1.6 mandating her taking no action, when she is attacked and cannot defend her silences. I CAN.

Rule 1.6 may have been able to annihilate my life... but it does NOT mandate my silence about it's corruption. It does not prevent me from challenging the constitutionality of a very twisted law which has damaged millions of Americans.

I don't know how she can restrain herself. As I read the articles attacking her credibility my respect for her grows. People don't understand. I'm supposed to hate her and be angry at her for what she did NOT do for me. BUT, I understand her silence. Her silent support of my cause. She's following the law... (even if it kills me.)

EVERY. PERSON. MATTERS.

JUSTICE IS COMING.

In a crowded theater, the person who yells FIRE is responsible for the panic - not the fire, not the arsonist.




Todd Krautheim & Terance Healy are running to the theater shouting "LOOK AT OUR HOSE".

Tugging the rug out from under judicial corruption and injustice in America.

JUSTICE IS COMING.

EVERY. PERSON. MATTERS.

HOW TO... Unconstitutional Corruption and Injustice

The constitution is very clear and concise about the authority of the sheriff.

The problem arose when the Rules of Professional Conduct were enacted into law by the court, without the legislature and or the governor.

Efffective 4-1-88, there was no lawful way to prosecute injustice or judicial misconduct in Pennsylvania. The rules made it unlawful for a District Attorney or Attorney General to do so. This was intentional and deliberate - protecting the integrity of the court by mandating a conspiracy of confidentiality and ignoring their crimes.

It was made very clear in KIDS FOR CASH - when no one stopped the judge and everyone knew what he was doing was wrong. The immorality and lack of ethics demonstrated by judges and lawyers was shameful.

A fly in the ointment. The sheriff had constitutional authority to prosecute AND was not required to follow the Rules of Professional Conduct. SO... the judges and lawyers and courts diminished the authority of the sheriffs through litigation and case law. Basically removing all of the sheriffs constitutional power, BUT not doing it in the Constitution where people would notice.

The sheriff is the chief law enforcement officer in the county. NOT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY who usurped the power.

from the Pennsylvania Sheriffs Association

The Sheriff is empowered to appoint deputies, and the deputies have the same powers as the Sheriff when performing their duties. the Sheriff is also invested with the power of the "posse comitatus" (the power or force of the county), which is the power to call upon "the entire population of the county above the age of fifteen, which the Sheriff may summon to his assistance in certain cases, to aid him in keeping the peace, and in pursuing and arresting felons." Today, the Sheriff, like all law enforcement officers, is faced with unprecedented challenges. However, if history is a guide, there is little question that the Office of Sheriff will adapt, grow, and change to meet the needs of modern law enforcement. The Office of Sheriff is an integral part of the American law enforcement system; a descendant of an ancient and honorable tradition. Office of Sheriff in Pennsylvania The office of the sheriff was recognized in the earliest reports of English law. Throughout history, the sheriff was recognized as the chief law enforcement officer in his shire or county. This status remains today, unless it has been changed by statutory law. The sheriff is also given authority to appoint deputies which are necessary in order to properly transact the business of his office. The requirement for training of deputy sheriffs is specifically provided by stature, i.e., the Deputy Sheriffs' Education and Training Act (1984 P.L. 3 No.2). However, based upon a Pennsylvania Supreme Court case, a deputy sheriff needs training similar to police officers to enable a deputy sheriff to enforce specific laws of Pennsylvania. A review of statutory law provides little guidance in addressing the issue of the duties, power, and authority of a sheriff. THE PA CONSTITUTION refers to the Sheriff as the Chief Law Enforcement Officer in the County. Case law provides that, although a sheriff's primary responsibilities are to the courts, the sheriff retains all arrest powers he/she had at common investigation of crime. CASE LAW is NOT law. It is how the courts have applied the law. It can be proven that the courts acted to diminish the authority of the sheriff to avoid their own arrest for sedition, undermining the state and federal governments, abusing the power of their office under color of law, in a conspiracy where they have denied and prevented the constitutional rights of the people. More importantly, since the sheriff retains all arrest powers he/she had at common law, he/she has the authority to enforce the criminal laws as well as the vehicle laws of Pennsylvania.

The Rules of Professional Conduct once made law included a major problem... when victimized by an injustice, the target has no escape, no equal protection under the law, and no recourse. Returning to the courts to address the court's injustice is an exercise in futility. Unfortunately, the victim must exhaust the state courts and be further victimized until being able to file in the federal courts... where the same failure of ethics and integrity requires appeal and escalation. It is understandable that these matters usually end in homelessness, prison or suicide. It was designed to be corrupt by the American Bar Association.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 is a case which is doing just that. The sacrifice of judicial integrity is embarrassing to the judicial branch of government in the state and the federal levels. They just spew back stupidity by making false, irrelevant and unsubstantiated and unsupported statements. And the next level of accountability does the same.

The issue is fully documented on the court record. Common Pleas Court. Superior Court. PA Supreme Court. Eastern District Court. Third Circuit Court of Appeals. Even a cursory review of the Challenge and the supporting cases demonstrate the problem AND THE DELIBERATE FAILURE OF THE COURTS TO ADDRESS THE INJUSTICE WITHIN THE JUDICIARY.

The victim has no choice but to persevere and continue to pursue the case in higher courts... with each court shamefully acting by embarrassing itself in their opinions and briefs. The courts clearly demonstrate their lack of any ethics, morals or integrity and their complete disdain for the US Constitution.

The Challenge is now heading before the US Supreme Court and the US Congress. The ABA undermined the judiciary and usurped the power of the legislatures in every state and federally. JUSTICE IS COMING

DID.

We are not being obstinate, and have requested a true, correct and independent review of the facts of the matter and application of appropriate law and doctrine.

However, the Court has demonstrated that it is determined to ignore the facts and to permit their decision to rest on the incorrect information.

All requests by the Appellants to present the matter to the court or to answer the questions of the court have been denied.

INJUSTICE does not end injustice. It extends it.

JUSTICE IS COMING.

MANDATORY UNCONSTITUTIONAL INJUSTICE: The Sedition by the American Bar Association in EVERY state

The Sedition by the American Bar Association IN EVERY STATE.

SEDITION:

In law, sedition is overt conduct, such as speech and organization, that is deemed by the legal authority to tend toward insurrection against the established order. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent (or resistance) to lawful authority.

The American Bar Association authored the law for the state Supreme Courts to enact, promulgate or mandate without the review by any state Legislature or Governor.

There was no review of the constitutionality of the law, directly, indirectly or collaterally.

Once enacted it became unlawful for the state to remove or repeal.

The victim was left with no where to turn.

The only ones who profited were the lawyers and judges - the membership of the American Bar Association.

The victim was left with no resolution, ... but could continue to try to escape by paying lawyers who were mandated by law to not reveal the cause of the injustice.

Lawyers making work for lawyers. The ABA, a trade organization, was looking after the interest of their members. The motivation for the crime.

The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land...

The people find the seditious actions of the American Bar Association in every state repugnant to their constitution.

The people find the conspiracy by every lawyer acting directly indirectly or collaterally to deny people of their constitutional rights to be criminal.

ON BEHALF OF THE VICTIMS, AND OURSELVES, WE RESPECTFULLY PETITION THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL - the only lawyer in the country who may lawfully act as he cannot be bound by Rule 1.6 to ignore the crime - TO PROSECUTE.

---

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 is in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.




Plaintiffs have lawfully petitioned the court and served the challenge on every US Attorney General to address a constitutional calamity which has ‘LAWFULLY BUT UNCONSTITUTIONALLY’ persisted in the United State for decades.

Rule 1.6 made it illegal for a lawyer to fix this crisis. It took two pro se defendants to find the needle in haystack of injustice… all deliberately and intentionally caused by the author of the ‘law’ … The American Bar Association.

The same unconstitutional law, same number, same name, in every state.

Read more at www.work2bdone.com/live

JUSTICE IS COMING.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6
Eastern District of Pennsylvania # 13-4614 (2-13-cv-04614-TON)
Third Circuit Court of Appeals # 13-4591

Rule 1.6 refers to the Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.6 – CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION unlawfully enacted into ‘law’ by each state Supreme Court. Unlawfully enacted because it results in the denial of rights and privileges protected by the United States Constitution.
JUSTICE IS COMING.

I was curious if you were aware of the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6?

I was curious if you were aware of the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6?

Rule 1.6 made it illegal to prosecute injustice in the United States. A ‘law’ in every state enacted by the state Supreme Court results in an unconstitutional loss of rights and privileges of a litigant victim when an act of injustice occurs in a courtroom. (In Civil, Criminal or Family Courts)

The ‘law’ makes it illegal for any prosecutor, district attorney or attorney general to prosecute the crime – because it
- would affect the integrity of the judiciary,
- would reveal the prosecutorial misconduct of their own office, or
- would expose individual liability.

The victim is left with no recourse, or escape. They are bullied and harassed by the courts until one of three possible outcomes results. Loss of EVERYTHING in their life, prison, or suicide.

There is nothing any judge can do to address the injustice. This is not judges protecting their own. It is a violation of Rule 1.6 if the judge even tries to address the injustice. Their judicial integrity is sacrificed. This angers the judge who then seems to take it out further on the victim.

When the act which caused the injustice is known and exposed (even in court) the damage to the victim worsens. The injustice grows each time the victim appears in court because no lawyer or judge may acknowledge or address the injustice or resolve the matter.

The overall result is abuse of power under color of law. In criminal courts the prosecutor’s aggressive misconduct is ignored. All ‘lawful’, but unconstitutional – as they are mandated to never reveal it or they are quickly disciplined and discredited. It cannot be dealt with until the litigant has his constitutional rights restored. But the victim would have to figure out how they lost their rights – and there is NO ONE TO HELP. (They made helping the victim of injustice illegal. No lawyer may participate. If they try, they are disciplined.)

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 is in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

Plaintiffs have lawfully petitioned the court and served the challenge on every US Attorney General to address a constitutional calamity which has ‘LAWFULLY BUT UNCONSTITUTIONALLY’ persisted in the United State for decades.

Each state lost the ability to address the injustice of their own courts, and mandated that no lawyer, attorney general or district attorney invite the federal government to investigate.

Each time the Federal Government has acted to address injustice and corruption of any state court, that state’s Supreme Court has modified Rule 1.6 to close the loophole. This leaves a trail which exposes the corruption caused by this ‘law’ which perverts the entire justice system.

Kids for Cash is one huge example in Pennsylvania. No one could stop it until a judge violated Rule 1.6 and reported it. Judge Ann Lokuta was disciplined and removed from the bench for doing the right thing.

A massive example is the foreclosure crisis nationwide, where a fraud upon the court – a forged and false mortgage note or deed – resulted in the actual fraud being ‘lawfully’ ignored by the court while people everywhere lost their homes. It wasn’t necessarily the banks that caused the crisis. It was the lawyers who committed the initial fraud upon the court which could not be addressed.

The victims of injustice lost their home because of a deliberate injustice and the mandate by Rule 1.6 that no one reveal it.

Rule 1.6 made it illegal for a lawyer to fix this crisis. It took two pro se defendants to find the needle in haystack of injustice… all deliberately and intentionally caused by the author of the ‘law’ … The American Bar Association.

The same unconstitutional law, same number, same name, in every state.

Read more at www.work2bdone.com/live

JUSTICE IS COMING.



The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6
Eastern District of Pennsylvania # 13-4614 (2-13-cv-04614-TON)
Third Circuit Court of Appeals # 13-4591

Rule 1.6 refers to the Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.6 - CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION unlawfully enacted into ‘law’ by each state Supreme Court. Unlawfully enacted because it results in the denial of rights and privileges protected by the United States Constitution.

JUSTICE IS COMING.
PDF Version

False Allegations... JUSTICE IS COMING

CONCERNING DISNEY's ONCE UPON A TIME:

FALSE ALLEGATIONS TO POLICE is an all too common occurrence. The victim of the false allegation suffers while the LIAR gets away with it. Had Hook hurt Emma there would have been a PSA.

Emma committing the crime of falsely accusing Hook being accepted as a goof or a prank only encourages THIS CRIME AGAINST MEN.

This action did not occur in the fictional town of Storybrooke or any of the other 'realms' where the show takes place. It happened in 'the real world' in New York. It involved New York Police arresting a man, keeping him overnight, and releasing him when the charges were dropped. The police got played. This is not activity which should be encouraged, endorsed or accepted.

The good guy gets hurt and the damage is ignored. False allegations to police destroy lives. Emma is the hero of the show - "The Savior". Resorting to illegal dirty tricks are not the traditional qualities of a hero. Also, Emma never even apologized before she reconnected with the victim and drove off to Storybrooke. Emma knew she was in the real world because she referred to her victim as Killian, and not Hook.

If you think it is a small matter you have no idea how terroristic divorce has become. Take it from the victim of A TERRORISTIC DIVORCE, you have no idea what goes on once you head down the rabbit hole of the American Judicial system. Eight years of injustice left me homeless and destitute with no future while under constant litigation.

It lead to a constitutional challenge which exposes why the US Constitution has been ignored since the late 1980's.



Once Upon A Time has been advertising that WICKED IS COMING. Maybe that's right in Storybrooke, but in 'the real world'...

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 is currently in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia...
JUSTICE IS COMING.

Foolish Retaliation Games... a sign of progress

Well somebody is likely not too happy that today's posting was DIRECT. It is remarkable how the mighty with their unlimited resources and financing fear the small.

I was banned on Facebook.

I was posting to the groups to which I have belonged and participated for years:

The American Bar Association has caused the problem, deliberately, intentionally, unethically, immorally, and unconstitutionally. They then made it illegal for lawyers and judges to fix it. Along comes 2 pro se defendants who can demonstrate the loss of constitutional rights and the law which caused it to happen and further caused it to be ignored by every level of law enforcement. Because it became unlawful to prosecute judicial corruption. Simply put... That's Unconstitutional. JUSTICE IS COMING. https://www.facebook.com/groups/ChallengeRule1.6/

---

Perhaps a status update of the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 is in order...

It is my belief that the US Attorneys General support the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6. Their oath of office indicates their responsibility to the US Constitution, BUT their Rules of Professional Conduct which they must follow as lawyers nullifies the rights of the people and prevents them from lawfully taking action to address the unconstitutionality of the law.

Each Attorney General failed to respond to the federal summons issued and served in August 2013. The Attorneys General intended to default, and have actually defaulted. The Attorneys General failed to answer. They also failed to file any appearance of counsel even though pro hac vice requirements were waived by Judge O'Neill. The one document electronically filed on behalf of Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane was untimely - and lacked any explanation or excuse.

The actions which have resulted in the case moving to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals are based on the actions of one lawyer, who neglected to present any valid argument for dismissal, and one judge who documented the failure of the laws and doctrines which substantiate dismissal BUT dismissed the case anyway.

We have discovered another active party in the courts actions. In the Eastern District Court, The Clerk of Courts has documented their failure to certify the matter and the failure to notify the US Attorney General for intervention. The clerk also documented their participation and deliberate actions to 'sandbag' the matter. This all appears on the docket.

The Clerk removed the Attorneys General from the matter though they must act in their official capacity. They were replaced by 56 people who were elected to serve as Attorneys General, appearing pro se, listed as unrepresented, with several being terminated from the case entirely. The clerk changed the case into personal civil litigation between two people and the Attorneys General in their unofficial capacity.

The matter is a constitutional challenge of a state law and as such according to Federal Law must be served upon the state Attorney General.

The docket also demonstrates when these actions occurred.

We have experienced the state courts games.

It was our anticipation that the manipulation of the matter would be less likely as the actions were filed with each state Attorney General, with copies to each state Governor, the Department of Justice, the FBI, the US Attorney General, the US Marshall Service. Posted to Facebook, and internet sites. Delivered to the news media organizations. Notices delivered to Bucks County Courthouse, Montgomery County Courthouse, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, and the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

The Third Circuit Court had started the appeal with the plaintiff having access to the Electronic Case Filing System. BUT, the notices have stopped without an order, a letter or an explanation.

The original request for electronic access was requested and filed with the District Court on September 6, 2013. The request was ignored.

The second request for electronic access was requested and filed with the District Court on October 18, 2013. The request was granted on October 23, 2013. The Court's unsubstantiated and improper dismissal of the matter occurred on October 29, 2013.

The Appeal would occur sooner than expected, AND be required because of misinformation relating to an attempt to dismiss the claim. All on paper. Not one hearing. And without 55 of the state Attorneys General, the US Attorney General, and each state Supreme Court.

There's the matter of the UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF RULE 1.6 which is the subject of the Constitutional Challenge. I suppose we will get to the heart of the matter after the foolish games and manipulations have stopped. If the Attorneys General had taken a stand on the matter, the constitutionally protected rights of the people would be restored and protected. RULE 1.6 mandates the Attorneys General take no action to reveal the injustice caused by the judiciary when the law was enacted.

Judge O'Neill was on the bench when this unconstitutional injustice was enacted. Sadly, the judge has neglected the opportunity to correct a nationwide injustice which devastates and destroys people, isolating them and ignoring their civil rights and liberties.

Protecting the integrity of the judiciary requires judges to have integrity... not just a lawful (but unconstitutional) mandate to conceal corruption and injustice in the courts.

JUSTICE IS COMING.