Pennsylvania District Attorneys - No mirrors in that place?

The PA District Attorneys attack the Governor who knows their corruption hidden by Rule 1.6

For whatever reason, they are taking this scrutiny VERY personally. They may revert to the womb when the Rule 1.6 story exposes their violation of the Public Trust for ... 30 years. Professionals, pretend to be Professionals. Their reaction is not surprising - when a bully gets exposed - they often break. Their victims laugh at their behavior. ...and tweet.



@DADaveFreed tweeted:

Tom Wolf was elected Governor, not King. He is misusing the concept of a death penalty reprieve. @PennsylvaniaDAs will fight this action

Philadelphia DAO @Philly_DAsOfc tweeted:

..the ppl most grateful for this "moratorium" on capital punishment are the guiltiest, cruelest, most vicious killers on death row.

Terance Healy @TeranceH tweeted:

@Philly_DAsOfc @PennsylvaniaDAs INJUSTICE- 30 years Rule 1.6 conceals the violation of the Public Trust & undermines CONSTITUTION #TrustLost

Atop that high horse do they think Rule 1.6 is a cloaking device?

Their press release includes mentions of people already convicted and those not yet tried. They suggest they are saving society while a governor who places a moratorium on the death penalty places people at risk.

The Governor wants to review the list, not remove the Death Penalty. That seems the respectable thing to do...

The District Attorney reaction - not so respectable, and somewhat heavy on the paranoia - but they know the Governor is aware of Rule 1.6 Corruption and Injustice.

THEY MUST KNOW because they have used it to prevent the Attorney General from speaking, or performing investigations and other responsibilities of the Office of the Attorney General.

Seems they were in on the secret - two secret court orders which silenced the AG about an unconstitutional law. They added a grand jury threat and a threat to impeach. There's been no explanation of those secrets. WHY IS NO ONE ASKING ABOUT THE IMPROPRIETY???

When violating a person's constitutional rights, the CLE training has been effective within the Pennsylvania District Attorneys. The Psychology of Confidentiality?? ANSWER: IGNORE THE PERSON and ignore the rule of law.

The District Attorneys have concealed Rule 1.6 corruption and injustice
... which violated the Constitutional rights of Pennsylvanians for 30 years.
... have attacked and threatened PA Attorney General Kathleen Kane while she is ordered MUTE
... they believe the only beneficiaries are people on death row.

People do not give a damn about people in prison. And we in PA have seen some prison abuses... which THEY ALL IGNORED.

THERE IS A HEIGHTENED AWARENESS OF INJUSTICE IN THE US. The District Attorneys are likely IGNORING.

They didn't see the signs... EVERY _______ MATTERS, They were everywhere. The People have noticed the INJUSTICE. Mebbe Y'all need a mirror AND a television.

In recent years, there have been many exonerated from Death row within the US. A review is not out of the question... as a matter of fact, for a Governor who knows the track record on civil rights and constitutional violations of those who purport to 'preserve protect and defend the Constitution" might be inclined for a more aggressive review. Gov Wolf has been in office only a few weeks. He's not ignoring... Enjoy the attention.

District Attorney Problems

Mine started with Bruce Castor ignoring me.
Risa Vetri Ferman ignored the crimes along with the corruption
David Heckler was no help, even once I moved to Bucks county. (Well, evicted, but more on that soon.)
Seth Williams has ignored the crimes and constitutional violations of the court staff.
So has David Heckler and Zane Memeger.
Kathleen Kane was ordered to ignore it... TWICE (LOL, Civil Rights? LOL. WTF.)

The investigation into my life started under Castor and continued under Ferman with advice from Heckler ignored by 3 Attorneys General, and 2 Governors - even where one had been an AG and all the surveillance on the books approved by Superior Court of Philadelphia and off the books handled by private investigators.

Whats a lot of intrusive surveillance shared with judges and your wife and her lawyers and your kids when you are at the lowest pointy in your life, and begging for them to investigate THEIR INVESTIGATION.

With no suicide, and no murders, and no crime prosecuted, what a waste of county resources, and eight years of undermining every aspect of a life. Well, that judge fuk'd you over and everyone had to hide the order and those crimes and the warrants and the crimes etc... Well, we had no excuse - it wasn't personal that your life was annihilated...

Anyway, it all started under Bruce Castor. It's his fault we terrorized you.

THEN, YOU FOUND OUT HOW WE LEGALIZED CORRUPTION AND CRIME AND INJUSTICE. To be honest WE DIDN'T EVEN GET IT. But, it worked like a charm, once ignored, victimized, without rights and no laws to protect you or anything you owned, we just IGNORED EVERYTHING. How did you figure out it was a law?

NEW RULE: DO NOT CHANNEL DA's... it conflicts with humanity and defies logic.

CASTOR PUTS THE DRUNK UNCLE ACT TO SHAME

Y'all did see what Bruce Castor had to say... Right? The New Years Eve Manifesto?

“you don’t go to war with a person who spends his/her professional life figuring how to [screw] others…”

The crazy bastard wants to be elected DA again. He attacked Bill Cosby in the media AFTER FAILING TO PROSECUTE HIM, or indict him.

When we know a Montgomery County Grand Jury could indict a ham sandwich if instructed by the DA.

If the allegations are true, Bruce seems to believe them. Bruce Castor left a man on the street to drug & rape 35 women??? Minimum - He oughta get Cosby's endorsement in the new campaign...

---

A CHILLING ASPECT CAME TO MIND WHEN I NOTICED THAT THEY DID NOT INVOKE THEIR USUAL POSTER CHILD FOR PHILADELPHIA.
Could his innocence be revealed... I can't imagine. After terrorizing that cop's wife for 30 years... I always had the feeling that may have been why they didn't execute him. Time will tell.

Is AG Kathleen Kane permitted to speak? Yet?

Is Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane permitted to speak?
- About those two secret orders?
- About the two secret courts which issued them?
- About the investigation she is not permitted to conduct?
- About the case she is not permitted to participate in?
- About the actual subject of the grand jury investigation?
- About the corruption mentioned on CNN?

Why does it seem the actions of Prosecutors and District Attorneys are behind the effort to silence the Attorney General. AND... is also the source of the information and attacks against the Attorney General.

After reading the New Years Eve Manifesto from former DA Bruce Castor about his 'skills' - abuse of power, corruption, strategic actions against perceived enemies. The effort to silence AG Kathleen Kane could be described exactly as Castor boasts:

"Career lawmen think strategically. They don’t go for the immediate gratification of a personal attack, instead preferring to set the board up just right and striking at the precise moment where the object of the attack cannot recover."

Could the Pennsylvania District Attorneys Association (PDAA) be the center of the effort to undermine the Attorney General using strategic misinformation and disinformation methods knowing that Kathleen Kane cannot respond - either because of those SECRET COURT ORDERS or because of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information. The District Attorneys have IGNORED the cases where Rule 1.6 Injustice has been triggered.

Has Bruce Castor - Former President of PDAA - violated the first rule of 'Fight Club'?

Rule 1.6 has been demonstrated to be unconstitutional - with complaints and evidence of the crimes and constitutional violations sent to two District Attorneys, the Attorney General of PA, and the US Attorney among others. Where the timing of events corresponds, AG Kane may have been secretly ordered to ignore the Rule 1.6 issue.

Why have the Philadelphia and Bucks County District Attorneys also neglected to acknowledge, respond or investigate? Could it be that they are involved in seeking those secret court orders which prevent Attorney General Kane from addressing the unconstitutional law - a responsibility of the Attorney General defined by law and procedure. The Attorney General has failed to address the matter in the Superior Court. (The Superior Court has concealed a document filed in the appeal and the court's response to that document. A Request for a copy of those documents has been IGNORED.)

Where the Judicial Branch has ordered the Executive Branch to ignore the laws of the Legislative branch, the judiciary has overthrown the entire state government in a broad violation of the Separation of Powers pursuant to and concealed by Rule 1.6 - Confidentiality of Information.

If you are going to deny a person of their constitutional rights and prevent any effort to address the issue of the unconstitutional law which has undermined his rights and denied any protection of the law since 2007, THAT BEST BE KEPT SECRET.

The secret orders are not valid because they seek to deny a person of their constitutional rights. Secretly issuing an order to restrict the efforts of a collateral authority, an attorney general, is ultimately improper and unconstitutional as it orders an official to violate their oath of office and the responsibilities of their office while permitting the US Constitution and the state Constitution to be ignored.

Rule 1.6 is again 'at play' indirectly undermining the rights of a person and demonstrating it's unconstitutional effect in the immediate event. An unconstitutional law is no law, a nullity, as if it never existed. However, until it is unconstitutional it is considered law. Where the Attorney General must follow the law, the corrupt perversion of Rule 1.6 becomes clear as it undermines the authority of the Attorney General.

Rule 1.6 has a built-in self defense which interferes and prevents it from being declared "unconstitutional".

"What is right is not always the same as what is legal." - Edward Snowden

The workaround: Non-lawyers in the Pennsylvania Legislature can act to suspend Rule 1.6 according to the PA Constitution Article I Section 12. Once suspended, the lawyers and legal professionals may address the issue and begin to restore their reputation and the integrity of the courts.

Americans will not be passive when they learn of the summary denial of constitutional rights because of an improperly enacted unconstitutional law which requires lawyers to be silent while incredible injustice occurs and the state and federal judiciary is undermined.

It seems very clear that the matter documented on this web site - A TERRORISTIC DIVORCE - is related to every issue, everyone and everything which has been published. Bruce Castor was the District Attorney when the case began in 2007. Risa Ferman has ignored a litany of crimes which violated the LAW and several court orders, AND additionally prevented investigations brought to her detectives by other County Officials.


Yet, it is what the media is not mentioning which I find intriguing...
- those two secret orders?
- the two secret courts which issued them?
- the investigation she is not permitted to conduct?
- the case she is not permitted to participate in?
- the actual subject of the grand jury investigation?
- the corruption mentioned on CNN?

When Kathleen Kane decides to speak, and is permitted to speak about those SECRET court orders, the prevented investigation and obstruction of the AG responsibilities, and is permitted to address the ACTUAL grand jury presentment and correct misinformation and disinformation...

I imagine it is going to be BIG. HUGE. BEYOND ANY PREVIOUS CONCEPT OR SCOPE OF PUBLIC CORRUPTION.

On CNN in November, Kane indicated:
“I knew that I was walking into public corruption. Which again is why I ran.”

“But I will tell you this. Even I am shocked at the level of public corruption.”

“I am shocked at how deep it goes.
I am shocked at how powerful it is.
I have never seen anything like this. It’s breathtaking.
It has been described by the people familiar with what is happening as shameful.”

“But, if this can be done to me as Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer of the 5th largest state in the country, I am sickened to think what can and may be done to regular, good people who don’t have the resources that I have to challenge it.”

If my experience with the extreme corruption within Montgomery County is any indication... those remarks from AG Kane indicate she recognizes what has occurred and understands my litigation and the necessity of the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6

The United States is on the threshold of a new age of JUSTICE... and end to the pervasive INJUSTICE.

I believe that Kathleen Kane recognizes her responsibility and comprehends her unique opportunity to make that happen.

JUSTICE IS COMING.

Commissioner Bruce Castor "schooled in how to really hurt you" and "to [screw] others"

The following text is from the Facebook page of Montgomery County Commissioner Bruce Castor. A post from December 31, 2014. ( Click for Picture )

The post presents an angry, frightening and chilling picture of Mr. Castor's mindset.

A prosecutor for 22 years, including two terms as District Attorney, who has served as President of the Pennsylvania District Attorneys Association. Castor believes he has attained a sterling reputation for pursuing truth, justice, and accountability in public office.

---

Interesting analysis penned by Brad Bumsted of the Trib on the AG Kane series of issues.

I have seen what is happening to Mrs. Kane happen before. Our state's top law enforcer declared war on the competence of career prosecutors but failed to understand that those she picked a fight with know how to fight back.

I've seen it happen numerous times and I marvel at how the "bully" doesn't see it.

While the oft quoted adage involving newspapers: "you don't go to war with a group that buys ink by the barrel..." may be a cliche, as is often the case with cliches, it became one because it is true.

A similar, perhaps soon to be cliche, might go "you don't go to war with a person who spends his/her professional life figuring how to [screw] others..."

If General Kane had achieved that level of professional expertise coming up through the prosecutorial ranks (not to denigrate the successes she did have in the trenches, but there is a difference between a line prosecutor, and a seasoned veteran of investigations and multi-faceted prosecutions that take months, if not years, to build, and hundreds of hours to prepare), she might have thought twice about engaging in this battle.

It is beyond question that she has lost.

What is in doubt is how badly, and what the fallout will be.

Career lawmen think strategically. They don't go for the immediate gratification of a personal attack, instead preferring to set the board up just right and striking at the precise moment where the object of the attack cannot recover.

I do not see how it is possible for Mrs. Kane to recover, as she is warring with not only newspapers (ink by the barrel) but also against professionals who really know their business.

I've witnessed a long line of politicians who have picked fights like this for short term personal or political benefit. I can't recall any that have managed to avoid being hurt far more seriously for having done so.

The irony is I have also seen the "doubling down" behavior exhibited by Mrs. Kane backfire time and again with politicians who want to continue the fight. Very damaging, as inevitably civil war ensues while the opposing party fills the vacuum.

The moral: don't pick a political fight against someone schooled in how to really hurt you.

---

An immediate reaction was not posted, as perhaps Mr. Castor had started his New Year's Eve celebration early. There has been time for Mr. Castor to consider his post, and to edit or delete it.

I will now address the twisted mindset of the Commissioner.

I do so as a person who has been denied the protection of the law while my civil and constitutional rights have been ignored in Montgomery County since 2007. The terror of my experience, and the destruction of every aspect of my life has lead to the finding of an unconstitutional law which causes, permits, excuses and ignores injustice. Even after finding the unconstitutional 'law', the injustice and lawlessness has continued the unrelenting attack upon my life, my family and my freedom.

I stood before Mr Castor in October 2013 and presented the unconstitutional law publicly asking for the Montgomery County Commissioners to assist in removing the law and preventing further injustice. Mr. Castor did nothing.

Where this law had affected myself, the children and families of the Luzerne County Cash for Kids scandal, and over 45 million homeowners nationwide affected by fraudulent foreclosures using false and robosigned documents, Mr Castor's 'sterling reputation for pursuing truth, justice, and accountability in public office' existed only in his biography and in his imagination.

I did not pick any fight, I requested the proper actions of law enforcement and I was IGNORED.

I expected proper procedures, protection of the law and justice to be served by the courts and I was IGNORED.

My survival and perseverance through the crimes, allegations, investigations and injustices was perceived as 'engaging in battle' by those who Castor's New Years Warning describes as those who "know how to fight back."

The people "who spends his/her professional life figuring how to [screw] others..." Where losing, how badly and what the fallout would be was the loss of every aspect of my existence - family, career, friends, possessions, home.

"Career lawmen think strategically. They don't go for the immediate gratification of a personal attack, instead preferring to set the board up just right and striking at the precise moment where the object of the attack cannot recover." Their strategic thinking was undone by my sincerity, my perseverance, the truth and an ability to foresee the unimaginable and survive the unavoidable.

Those "schooled in how to hurt" me, or anyone, possess a character so flawed by corruption, injustice and conspiracy that they are not capable of recognizing that my effort to remove an unconstitutional law also relieves them of the burden of it's mandate. A mandate which has corrupted an entire profession by requiring silence in the face of the most malicious injustice.

Castor's twisted and angry attacks against Attorney General Kathleen Kane are motivated by the shame and humiliation of his own actions and the actions of his profession.

Castor is likely aware of the efforts of two secret court orders which prevent Attorney General Kathleen Kane from her responsibilities and mandate she neglect involvement even where required by law. These orders directly affect my litigation and my life as the involvement of the Attorney General in the matter is a necessity.

The Montgomery County Grand Jury called the attorney general into their investigation, as such the attorney general is expected to respect the secrecy requested and is not discussing the topic. The attorney general is ALSO prevented from correcting the misinformation being presented by the news media regarding the grand jury which is speculative information at best. Where a grand jury can be utilized to secure and prevent confidential information and records, I am greatly concerned that their effort seeks to conceal and prevent exposure of the involvement of county resources, personnel and departments which affect current and future litigation.

A Special Prosecutor may be requested to testify about the grand jury process, however, in the case of this grand jury, Thomas Carluccio would likely be excused from any testimony which would implicate his wife, Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio, in criminal and unconstitutional actions. Carluccio's selection to conduct the grand jury seems to be the type of 'strategic' move 'setting the board up' as you indicated 'where the object of the attack cannot recover."

District Attorney Risa Ferman has ignored the reports and criminal complaints. DA Ferman has instructed her detectives NOT to investigate multiple crimes, including identity theft, breaking and entering, burglary, child endangerment, fraudulent conveyance of property etc. The District Attorney has IGNORED EVERY CRIME against me since 2007, while 20 members of the Montgomery County Judiciary have heard the case. The judiciary has neglected to enforce my wife's compliance with ANY AND EVERY Court Order - while holding me to the most strict written (AND UNWRITTEN) statements.

Where the actions of the judiciary have caused a clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction, absolute judicial immunity is not available to prevent their liability for their corruption. As such, they IGNORE.

Mr. Castor, you have participated in a conspiracy of injustice of massive proportions. As lawyer, prosecutor, district attorney and public official, you should be humiliated and ashamed of your actions and the conspiracy to conceal your efforts. The very last thing you should be doing currently is avoiding you own advice. DON'T BE THE POLITICIAN WHO WISHES TO CONTINUE A FIGHT ON THE WRONG SIDE OF JUSTICE.

DON'T BE THE LOUDMOUTH OR THE BULLY WHO INTERJECTS HIMSELF INTO A SITUATION WHERE HE IS NOT PROPERLY INFORMED.

DON'T INTERJECT YOUR RHETORIC AND MISINFORMATION TO PREVENT LAWFUL ACTIONS TO ADDRESS A CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS WHICH HAS AFFECTED THE ENTIRE UNITED STATES.

DON'T PICK A FIGHT WITH SOMEONE WHO HAS ALREADY LOST EVERYTHING AND IS FIGHTING FOR HIS SURVIVAL.
- WHERE YOU CANNOT IMAGINE THE TERROR OF LIFE WITHOUT ANY PROTECTION OF THE LAW AND WITHOUT CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, AND
- WHERE YOU CANNOT IMAGINE HOW A MAN COULD PERSEVERE AND BELIEVE IN JUSTICE ACTING WITH GENUINE HOPE AND A BELIEF IN JUSTICE WHICH PERMITS HIM TO NOT HATE THE LAWYERS, BUT TO HATE THE UNETHICAL UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW WHICH HAS CAUSED THE ENTIRE LEGAL PROFESSION GREAT EMBARRASSMENT.

Your Resignation is appropriate.

Then, recognizing your twisted and perverted abuse of power, and the corruption which you attempt to protect and defend, and your angry attacks against the elected officials who are taking their oath of office and their responsibilities seriously.

Compose a concise letter of resignation where you set your ego aside and apologize to the people you have hurt throughout your career and those families affected by the suicides caused by ignored injustice.

You may want to Thank Attorney General Kathleen Kane. She's going to restore the reputation of lawyers and the integrity of the judiciary not only in Pennsylvania, but nationwide.

“I knew that I was walking into public corruption. Which again is why I ran.”

“But I will tell you this. Even I am shocked at the level of public corruption.”

“I am shocked at how deep it goes.
I am shocked at how powerful it is.
I have never seen anything like this. It’s breathtaking.
It has been described by the people familiar with what is happening as shameful.”

“But, if this can be done to me as Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer of the 5th largest state in the country, I am sickened to think what can and may be done to regular, good people who don’t have the resources that I have to challenge it.”

AG Kane acknowledged that the grand jury's work is "something that's been on my mind. But I'm very confident that the truth will come out and that justice will prevail."

JUSTICE IS COMING.

Team Corbett continues attacks on the 'silenced' AG Kane

Tom Corbett, Frank Fina, Seth Williams, Bob Brady, Dave Heckler, Stewart Greenleaf, Bruce Castor, Risa Ferman, Tom Carluccio...

Pointing LOUDLY to one investigation with political suggestions, yet neglecting to address an investigation with two secret court orders from two secret judges in two secret courts.

Why does Team Corbett keep pointing to the 'low hanging fruit'? A distraction from the unprecedented - TWO SECRET COURT ORDERS WHICH PREVENT ACTION, EXPOSURE, INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION. What is that all about???

District Attorneys Heckler & Williams have ignored the well-documented crimes and constitutional violations of the courthouse staff.

Questioning the discretion of the Attorney General in spite of the corruption being concealed by court orders. Those who are not discussing the secret court orders are logically the people responsible for requesting the corrupt judicial actions.

Team Corbett is clearly focused on keeping "everything Sandusky' out of the public domain - if they lose Rule 1.6 Confidentiality then the public will learn EVERYTHING. The Unconstitutional affect of Rule 1.6 is proven in those criminal reports of violation of PA law and the US constitution. If they cannot conceal injustice and corruption under Rule 1.6, they will likely be joining Jerry Sandusky and wearing orange Team Corbett jumpsuits.

Every corrupt action to ignore the unconstitutional law - called Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information - is ONLY protected until the unconstitutional is acknowledged. It is proven in those lapsed investigations in the Philadelphia and Bucks County District Attorney's Offices. The complaint filed in both counties and federally with US Attorney Zane Memeger. An additional investigation was requested by the U.S. Postal Inspectors as the Central Legal Staff of the court used the mail in their fraud and forgery.

Attorney General Kathleen Kane has been court ordered NOT TO INVESTIGATE.

Governor Elect Tom Wolf, Shut Down The Montgomery County Courthouse.

“But I will tell you this. Even I am shocked at the level of public corruption.”
I am shocked at how deep it goes.
I am shocked at how powerful it is.
I have never seen anything like this. It’s breathtaking.
It has been described by the people familiar with what is happening as shameful.”

“But, if this can be done to me as Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer of the 5th largest state in the country, i am sickened to think what can and may be done to regular, good people who don;t have the resources that I have to challenge it.”

- Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane on two court ordered mandates from unidentified judges and unidentified courts.

Governor Wolf, SHUT DOWN THIS COURTHOUSE.

The terror of their injustice is unrestricted and boundless and concealed by corrupt manipulation of the willing judiciary.

“But I will tell you this. Even I am shocked at the level of public corruption.”
I am shocked at how deep it goes.
I am shocked at how powerful it is.
I have never seen anything like this. It’s breathtaking.
It has been described by the people familiar with what is happening as shameful.”

“But, if this can be done to me as Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer of the 5th largest state in the country, i am sickened to think what can and may be done to regular, good people who don;t have the resources that I have to challenge it.”

- Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane on two court ordered mandates from unidentified judges and unidentified courts.

Governor Wolf, Shut down the Montgomery County Courthouse.

Assemble the Pennsylvania Legislature... Suspend Rule 1.6 and arrest and prosecute the monsters who terrorize this county and bring shame upon the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Thank the lawyers in the Legislature for their service and accept their resignations. Sen. Stewart Greenleaf and Rep. Todd Stephens should be at the front of the line... followed by the Judiciary Committees who ignored the issue... and then every lawyer in the Senate and Legislature. They have all participated in 'the worst kept secret in Pennsylvania'.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Chief Justice Ron Castille can expose the Judges and Judiciary who prevented the Pennsylvania Attorney General from performing the responsibilities of the Office of Attorney General by issuing 'secret' orders to promote corruption and perversions of justice in violation of law, the Pennsylvania Constitution and the Constitution of the United States of America.

When you stop payment of the pensions to the corrupt, and seize the property obtained using their ill-gotten gains, you'll find the money to pay for that shortfall in the budget.

Proclaim JUSTICE throughout All the Land
Unto All the Inhabitants thereof.

... Don't be distracted by the petty stories of naughty emails and the infighting from those bullies already evicted from the AG's office. Friends of the last AG who ignored the massive corruption for years...

Mr. ______, Shut down this courthouse.

Who will be the one to end the abomination of injustice and corruption perpetuated by the criminals on the Montgomery County Judiciary?

Gov. Tom Corbett - YOU FAILED. YOU IGNORED IT. YOU PARTICIPATED. YOU ENDORSED. No wonder you shuddered on the day Terance Healy introduced himself to you in Doylestown.

Attorney General Eric Holder - The United States Attorney General is the only lawyer in the country permitted to take action by law. Why are you taking so long? People are being killed because of the criminal actions of an entire judiciary.

Governor elect Tom Wolf - A non-lawyer who can lawfully take action to end a terrorist regime in the second largest county in Pennsylvania. Act now before they make it illegal for you to address the issue.

Governor Wolf... Shut Down this Courthouse!

Assemble the Pennsylvania Legislature... Suspend Rule 1.6 and arrest and prosecute the monsters who terrorize this county and bring shame upon the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Thank the lawyers in the Legislature for their service and accept their resignations. Sen. Stewart Greenleaf and Rep. Todd Stephens should be at the front of the line... followed by the Judiciary Committees who ignored the issue... and then every lawyer in the Senate and Legislature. They have all participated in 'the worst kept secret in Pennsylvania'.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Chief Justice Ron Castille can expose the Judges and Judiciary who prevented the Pennsylvania Attorney General from performing the responsibilities of the Office of Attorney General by issuing 'secret' orders to promote corruption and perversions of justice in violation of law, the Pennsylvania Constitution and the Constitution of the United States of America.

When you stop payment of the pensions to the corrupt, and seize the property obtained using their ill-gotten gains, you'll find the money to pay for that shortfall in the budget.

Proclaim JUSTICE throughout All the Land
Unto All the Inhabitants thereof.

... Don't be distracted by the petty stories of naughty emails and the infighting from those bullies already evicted from the AG's office. Friends of the last AG who ignored the massive corruption for years...

Come On, Kathleen - Rule 1.6'd again?

Seems every time that Kathleen Kane is in the news she is being baited by politicians who know she must conceal crimes committed by her clients - they include the Governor, her staff - and former staff members, various state agencies, etc.

Rule 1.6 of The Rules of Professional Conduct improperly and unconstitutionally enacted by the state Supreme court is the noose which Kathleen Kane wears as an accessory every time she goes into the public eye. She's not permitted to discuss her clients crimes.

Rule 1.6 is Confidentiality of Information – an aggressively enforced mandate of silence where the information
– would affect the integrity of the judiciary,
– would reveal the misconduct of their own office,
– would expose individual liability,
– would adversely affect any client.

Kathleen Kane wears the albatross of Rule 1.6 like Oscar night jewelry... and no one notices. Kathleen Kane knows the law. Kathleen Kane won't fall into their trap. Joan Rivers wouldn't have hesitated to ask Kathleen Kane "Who's shame she is wearing."



Has Kathleen Kane finally found a way that her clients have authorized a 'release'... of their Confidential Information?

AG Kane reveals X-rated emails

Corbett, Castille press for names, details on porn e-mails

Kathleen Kane demonstrates restraint - Rule 1.6 as a weapon

Kathleen Kane's credibility is on the line - MORNING CALL July 5, 2014

Rule 1.6 is a law which mandates confidentiality of information. It's unconstitutional. it causes judges to sacrifice their integrity. It requires law enforcement to ignore corruption and injustice. Rule 1.6 mandates that Kathleen Kane not explain that it is being used by those who are well aware of it to attack her credibility where she is mandated to conceal their corruption and misconduct.

Rule 1.6 mandated confidentiality is a tool for corruption and injustice - and the denial of constitutional rights. The Kids For Cash scandal. The Sandusky Conspiracy. Foreclosure through fraud. All enabled, delayed, and ignored for years because of a mandate that lawyers and judges MUST ignore judicial corruption and injustice. Rule 1.6 demands that confidentiality from district attorneys and attorneys general.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 was undermined by a member of Kathleen Kane's office. His actions required the integrity of the federal courts to be sacrificed - made the courts deny the law and the constitution and prevented them from explaining. Because of Rule 1.6, Kathleen Kane can take no action to expose the case being undermined by her office.

The Weaponized version of Rule 1.6, seems to be the choice of the District Attorneys of Pennsylvania. They dare to attack the actions of the Pennsylvania Attorney General with the knowledge that she is not lawfully permitted to answer their statements. Seth Williams hired Frank Fina after Fina undermined his own investigation requiring the case to be dropped. Both know that Attorney General Kane is mandated to confidentiality when it would expose the misconduct of employees of the office of the Attorney General.

Same conditions with regard to the stalled Sandusky investigation which was delayed for years.
The Sandusky report was a sham... mandated by Rule 1.6 to not include misconduct of the investigation. The Supreme Court actually updated the Rules of Professional Conduct to conceal the emails - over 8 times they edited the law for the purpose of email confidentiality. BUT, Rule 1.6 prevents AG Kane from saying it. She must protect the integrity of a court which boldly and arrogantly lacks any shred of integrity. A Supreme court which hides behind a curtain of confidentiality THEY CREATED TO CONCEAL JUDICIAL CORRUPTION.

I have been victimized for over 9 years by injustice and corruption - no protection of the law and no constitutional rights. Homeless, destitute and terrorized to the point where I had to find out why they thought it was OK. Rule 1.6 makes it OK to ignore corruption, injustice and terrorism.

JUSTICE IS COMING. And while Kathleen Kane can't do anything to help because of Rule 1.6 mandating her taking no action, when she is attacked and cannot defend her silences. I CAN.

Rule 1.6 may have been able to annihilate my life... but it does NOT mandate my silence about it's corruption. It does not prevent me from challenging the constitutionality of a very twisted law which has damaged millions of Americans.

I don't know how she can restrain herself. As I read the articles attacking her credibility my respect for her grows. People don't understand. I'm supposed to hate her and be angry at her for what she did NOT do for me. BUT, I understand her silence. Her silent support of my cause. She's following the law... (even if it kills me.)

EVERY. PERSON. MATTERS.

AG Kathleen Kane demonstrates Rule 1.6 Confidentiality

Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane neglected to include the following disclaimer in the Sandusky Report. This DISCLAIMER would have eliminated the questions raised by the report.

D I S C L A I M E R

The Attorney General of Pennsylvania represents the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Governor, the Attorney General's office, various branches of the government, their agencies and their officers. The Rules of Professional Conduct - Rule 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION mandate confidentiality of client information where the information - would affect the integrity of the judiciary, - would reveal the prosecutorial misconduct of their own office, - would expose individual liability, - would adversely affect their client.

AS SUCH...

The Report to the Attorney General in the Investigation of Gerald Sandusky may not legally present - anything which exposes a negative impact of the judiciary - anything which exposes misconduct of Attorney General Tom Corbett - anything which exposes misconduct of Governor Tom Corbett - anything which exposes misconduct of Acting Attorney General William H. Ryan, Jr - anything which exposes misconduct of Attorney General Linda Kelly - anything which exposes misconduct of Attorney General Kathleen Kane - anything which exposes misconduct of the Attorney General's office - anything which exposes misconduct of Frank Fina - anything which exposes misconduct the Commonwealth - anything which exposes misconduct of any state agency - anything which exposes misconduct, participation or acts of obstruction by any of the above in their individual capacity, or as a conspiracy - anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on April 3, 2009 - anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on May 2, 2009 - anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on April 9, 2012 - anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on April 18, 2012 - anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on June 16, 2012 - anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on July 4, 2012 - anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on November 21, 2013 - anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to create, modify or fine tune any "LAW" regarding the Confidentiality of Email concealed within the Rules of Professional Conduct.

Further, acting as Attorney General, I have contracted the creation of the report to Widener University law professor and former federal prosecutor H. Geoffrey Moulton. ( You might say "I am his client." and that the Rules of Professional Conduct mandate his confidentiality for my protection. ) Because, I AM. and IT DOES.

The Report additionally will not contain any information regarding the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 - CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION which was filed in federal court on August 8, 2013 (by two men who do not have to maintain confidentiality so we do it for them) seeking to restore the constitutional rights of litigants while restoring the integrity and reputation of the judiciary and the legal profession and to deliver to the legislature the ability to perform the duties of their position to responsibly manage the law.

The Challenge now approaches the United States Supreme Court and the United States Congress where every level of the state and federal judiciary has ignored the clear evidence of the Courts' denial of constitutional rights and demonstrated their own actions to prevent resolution of the matter which was served to fifty-six states attorneys general - all of whom defaulted on the matter... YET, THE COURT IGNORED THEIR DELIBERATE DEFAULT.

P.S.

Yes, I shot my mouth off during my campaign for Attorney General of Pennsylvania, AND I promised to investigate Attorney General Tom Corbett's mishandling of the Sandusky case, AND I believed Corbett to be stalling the case so it would not impact his run for Governor, AND I was elected to the position of Attorney General, AND I have an obligation to the People of The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, BUT, as Attorney General, these corrupt and incompetent horses asses are NOW my clients, my boss, and my staff... The RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT mandate confidentiality.

With regard to the non-participation of the Pennsylvania State Police in the preparation and assembly of this report.... Did someone tell the PSP that we wouldn't publish anything they might have to say because of our confidentiality mandate? Their participation would have potentially require a great deal of redaction and editing.

The Pennsylvania State Police do NOT have a Confidentiality Mandate. If they were to issue a report, I imagine it would be different.



1.6 Confidentiality of Information - While the Model Rule 1.6(a) duty of confidentiality is closely related to the attorney-client privilege, it is broader in scope than the attorney-client privilege, “which is a rule of evidence,” or “the work product immunity which is a rule of procedure.”

Rule 1.6 causes a mandated confidentiality of information regarding injustice and judicial corruption.

This was demonstrated in Luzerne County where Kids For Cash was IGNORED by every judge, district attorney, prosecutor and lawyer... until Judge Ann Lokuta violated the law and called the FBI to report Ciavarella et al. Ann Lokuta was disciplined and removed from the bench for her violations of Rule 1.6.

The Foreclosure Crisis nationwide was caused similarly by an ACT OF FRAUD UPON THE COURT resulting in the loss of constitutional rights and the loss of homes to fraudulent actions filed by lawyers (and judges) MANDATED to maintain confidentiality.

THE STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS LET THIS HAPPEN TO MILLIONS OF PEOPLE.
THEY. LET. IT. HAPPEN.

Rule 1.6 mandates that an Attorney General ignore judicial corruption and injustice
- without regard for the number of children improperly incarcerated by a judge,
- without regard for the number of homes foreclosed upon using fraudulent documents,
- without regard for basic constitutional, civil and human rights,
- without regard for the denial of equal protection of the law,
- without regard for the law,
- without regard for an oath of office,
- without regard for ethics or morality, and
- without mercy for the victims overwhelmed, destitute and pushed to their limits who commit suicide.

Rule 1.6 DELIBERATELY PREVENTS LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL...

Two lawful ways to resolve the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6

There are only two lawful ways to resolve the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6

1. Default by state attorneys general within the Federal Court.
2. An Act of Congress.

The state and federal courts have all mandated that they may take no action to adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary. A mandated bias and prejudice which prevents an independent review by the courts at every level.

The attorneys general can lawfully default in the challenge and the result is the requirement of the court to accept the default and find Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional. 55 of 56 attorneys general defaulted in the challenge.

Default was the gentle quiet resolution in the best interest of the entire country to avoid alarm and civil unrest.

The unexplained late filing of a future intention to dismiss on behalf of AG Kane required the response of the court. That 'Monkeywrench' thrown by Randall Henzes, purportedly on behalf of Attorney General Kane, sacrificed the integrity of the judges in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals who are mandated to conceal and suppress the matter. The improper doctrine and imaginary references presented are an embarrassment.

Default would have allowed the judges to maintain their individual dignity in this instance.

The United States Supreme Court additionally has the bias and prejudice of "protecting the integrity of the judiciary" from the exposure of the sedition of every state court in actions which denied the constitutional rights of the people of every state.

An Act of Congress will be required to address the situation. Constitutionally, the Congress must address the failure of the judiciary. Following the example of South Africa's Constitution, Congress must act to address the violation of the public trust by the judicial branch and prevent any future jeopardy to the liberty and rights of the People.

YOU DO NOT PROTECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIARY BY SEDITION
OR
BY DENYING THE RIGHTS OF INDIVIDUALS IN CIVIL, FAMILY and CRIMINAL COURTS,
OR
BY DENYING THE RIGHTS OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES IN LUZERNE COUNTY,
OR
BY DENYING THE RIGHTS OF MILLIONS OF HOMEOWNERS IN FRAUDULENT FORECLOSURE ACTIONS.

Every US Senator has been notified of the Constitutional Challenge.

Senator Toomey and Senator Casey of Pennsylvania have avoided meetings on the topic.

There are only two lawful ways to resolve the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6. 1. By the deliberate default by the Attorneys General in federal court, resulting in Rule 1.6 being declared unconstitutional without the court's interaction. 2. An Act of Congress. The Federal Judiciary has a mandate which does not permit them to adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary. If the decision goes to the federal judges, they are required to sacrifice their integrity and write orders which have no basis in fact, law or legal doctrine. Examples are documented in EVERY order from a federal judge. The state Supreme Courts are under the same mandate. As such, they too are legally prevented from repealing their law, or finding it unconstitutional. The Federal Court did not certify the constitutional challenge with each state court because it would require a false answer. The state Legislatures are similarly prevented from action. The non-lawyer governors may have legal authority, however the attorney general or private counsel are not permitted to advise them of such.

HEY, OVER HERE... we're suing AG Kathleen Kane too.

Everyone is suing Attorney General Kathleen Kane and their cases are mentioned in the television and news media and the blogs.

They neglect to mention that she is named in the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 which is now in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

How's that for a demonstration about how CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION works?

Rule 1.6 explains all of their actions... Lawyers using ridiculous speculation and posturing are politicizing justice and law enforcement. All a criminal needs to do is involve the judiciary in their crimes to mandate the law community into silence. While mandated to not disclose the known facts, that leaves speculation and fiction to get the front page.

It undermines truth. It undermines the constitution.

The Attorney / Client Rhetoric

The Attorney / Client Rhetoric

First, Rule 1.6 is called CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION. It is NOT called Attorney-Client privilege.

The thing is that Lawyers, such as the state Attorneys General, are often not even certain of their client.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 is demonstrating the attorneys general dancing around the responsibilities of their office.

From the National Association of Attorneys General we can learn about their dance moves.

So, How to Decide Who Is The Client? The answer is not as simple as picking one from a list of the alternatives. A variety of courts and authors have considered the issue deciding who the client of the government attorney might be. The general consensus is that there are five possible answers to the question: - Public - Government as a whole - Branch of government in which employed - Particular agency or department - Responsible officers who make decisions with an agency or department

NOW, as AG you have to maintain confidentiality of information for all of the above 'clients'.

AND

You must follow Rule 1.6... and maintain confidentiality where the information
- would affect the integrity of the judiciary,
- would reveal the prosecutorial misconduct of their own office, or
- would expose individual liability.

Do you now see why lawyers are not legally allowed to even approach the unconstitutional aspects of Rule 1.6?

But two pro se litigants with over 8 years of experience with the terror of injusrtice are lawfully allowed to do what the lawyers made illegal for each other to do.

Healy & Krautheim can address the unconstitutionality... They file... SILENCE.

Take a look at recent events... Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane has ended a multi-year investigation of corruption where confidential informant(s) were deliberately targeting and setting up a handful of black politicians in Philadelphia. Never so succesfully to result in any prosecution. And this had been going on for years (AG Tom Corbett) and years (AG William Ryan) and years (AG Linda Kelly). The investigation was halted upon the election of AG Kane. So who is the Attorney General's client? Herself? Her predecessors? The Commonwealth? The AG's Office? The Investigators? The Public? Along comes Frank Fina beating his chest like TARZAN and making all kinds of ridiculous accusations about what the Attorney General is keeping secret about HIS investigation gone horribly off track. Fina is a lawyer. He's making broad remarks... wide allegations... talking about the information he knows can't be presented... If any of them ever get specific about the information... They will violate Rule 1.6 Confidentiality and be disciplined/prosecuted. Rule 1.6 is how corruption goes unprosecuted and unpunished. Rule 1.6 is being used as a political game to mislead the public. They all know what they cannot say. They know what each other cannot say. Whenever you are viewing the actions of lawyers who must follow the mandate for corruption and injustice defined by Rule 1.6... The story is more about what they are not saying... and what they are accusing each other of not saying... because they feel safe, hidden and protected. Rule 1.6 is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Imagine. The things we will learn about corruption and injustice when their safe, protected hiding place is no longer available. Those with honor and integrity will be clearly revealed once they are not required to conceal the criminal malice, corruption and injustice of those who undermine our society. Hey Frank Fina... Sit down with us and we will explain it to you. Shouting loud at Attorney General Kathleen Kane who cannot lawfully respond is a cowardly move. Bring the media... It's time the people learned what has happened to their Constitution.

JUSTICE IS COMING.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 - Status Update

08/08/2013	Challenge Filed in Federal Court
09/06/2013	AG Kathleen Kane requests extension in response time
09/11/2013	Healy Krautheim respond
09/16/2013	Judge O'Neill grants extension
09/27/2013	AG Kane files Motion to Dismiss

Alternate Web: http://challengerule16.blogspot.com/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/ChallengeRule1.6/


The secret is out. An organization which stayed in the shadows... hiding the TRUTH. Now, we know.

I know they've got men everywhere waiting to put me down. I know how this usually plays out. I'm not like the other guys. It matters who I am. Inside. If i am a good person. If I am strong. They took my life, my job, my house, my children, my family. They think this is killing me. All over there's people being pushed down. Being robbed. When one of them tries to stand up. They've got to make an example out of him. All they do is lie. They said if we worked hard... if we did 'right'... we'd have a place. They said it was enough to be a man. They act like giants. We're what they step on. It does matter who you are. EVERY LIFE MATTERS.

Time for Integrity. Time for Respect. Time for Justice.
EVERY LIFE MATTERS

Rule 1.6 - "No, that's just ...." Extend the deadline - indefinitely.

What? Rule 1.6? That's not...? That's just...? Huh? Oh it's about...
All of the reasons that you would NEVER look at Rule 1.6...
Reasons you should ignore Rule 1.6...
Move along... it doesn't concern you. UNTIL IT DOES.

Rule 1.6 hides as a rule regarding Attorney-Client privilege.

Attorney-Client privilege builds trust based on the acceptance of concealing fraud and lies... even when the lies and fraud are presented in the court as truth.

Rule 1.6 is a smokescreen. A catch all which can be twisted as needed. The scripts are published. Everything about it is smoke and mirrors. Everything about it is wrong.

Rule 1.6 prevents lawful action by law enforcement to prosecute crimes by judges. How many judges have ever been prosecuted by a state for judicial misconduct? How many states stopped judicial misconduct from continuing? In Pennsylvania alone, the situation is clear. This isn;t attacking judicial immunity for errors in judgment. This is criminal actions and terror which is reported and goes unaddressed, unproscecuted, and unstopped. Cash for Kids is the most blatant in memory. But it seems the concept that everyone looked the other way was acceptable. WHY did they think their actions were lawful? Because Rule 1.6 made it not only lawful, but MANDATORY.

Attorney General Tom Corbett did nothing. Attorney General Linda Kelly did nothing. Attoenry General Kathleen Kane has been provided the opportunity to explain the failures of her predecessors. The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 which has been served to AG Kane and the Attorneys General of the untied States provides the opportunity to end the lawful dismissal of criminal actions by the judiciary. BUT, it exposes the Rule which caused the inability to prosecute law. It exposes the organization behind the Rule adopted and enacted in every US state.

The American Bar Association.

Now, we have a much bigger problem. Treason? Sedition? RICO organization? With lawyers in every level of government who MUST follow their Rule 1.6 or face the consequences for breaking it. Violate Rule 1.6 and you are ruined, disbarred, and attacked. Any lawyer who dares to sp[eak out against a judge is not only ruined. They are destroyed. The penalties for violating Rule 1.6 are as extreme as if you were a victim of it's destructive effect on justice.

The opportunity to lawfully address it was lawfully laid upon the Federal Bench in Philadelphia on August 8, 2013 by two pro se litigants who lawfuilly had standing, a lawful cause for relief, a court record to lawfully correlate their loss of rights and the sense to lawfully present the matter as a constitutional challenge lawfully permitting them to lawfully address the unconstitutional law in every state.

The Defendant AGs who could not lawfully respond to the Challenge... did the only lawful thing they could think of without mentioning any of the issues. They cannot address the issues lawfully, because any action which addresses the issues would be construed as violating Rule 1.6.

With the other AGs hiding in silence and WITHOUT ANY BASIS for the request, AG Kathleen Kane requested an extension in the deadline.

Judge O'Neill extended the deadline INDEFINITELY.

INDEFINITELY.

And then what....

I have been asked what will happen if the Federal Court grants Attorney General Kathleen Kane's Motion to Dismiss.

The answer. Appeal.

Which continues in front of another Federal court. SCOTUS?

Rule 1.6 is a parasite that feeds on the integrity of the court. It craves the higher court. It fears only one thing - exposure.

So much effort is placed in concealing it's existence. The smokescreen of the way it is written. The ridiculous notion that keeping lies a secret builds trust between lawyer and client. It's even called CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION. Clearly, Rule 1.6 wants to be unknown.

There is only one method which prevents Rule 1.6 from consuming the integrity of the court.

In my case, it spread through 18 judges in Montgomery County. Only one (1) judge in my case in Montgomery County suffered no loss of integrity. He was also the one best positioned to KNOW what occurs when Rule 1.6 is involved in a matter.

He did NOTHING.

He was the only one who did NOT make it worse. No better. But uniquely, Judge Haaz is the only one who did not make it worse. Which was the best move for everyone involved. He suffered no loss of integrity - because he did not hold the hearing; he did not respond to letters; he ignored the case.

I keep thinking "First, do no further harm" best describes Judge Haaz handling of the case. Immediately. When the criteria for RULE 1.6 were presented in his court, Judge Haaz did nothing. The best he could do in the situation.

Judge Bertin did not go willingly into the corruption of my case. He could not make things better. Rule 1.6 prevents it.

Judge Carluccio delighted in the malice and destruction. Her intent was clear - suicide. When I could not oblige, the case was prevented from the Superior Court. A temporary situation waiting for the target to ... go away.

Judge Page thought he had integrity, even after being warned that each judge had sacrificed their integrity to protect the integrity of the prior judges. Ironically, his was the fastest, most informed and most blatantly visible loss of integrity.

The integrity of the Superior Court was about to be served. Salvaging the integrity of the Superior Court, and the Supreme Court of PA which was next could only be accomplished in a Federal Court with jurisdiction, standing and a cause for relief etc... no divorces... Yes, we had a constitutional complaint as soon as we find the law that caused everything. Rule 1.6 was clearly responsible.

Rule 1.6 is NOT a good thing. Look what it does to good people. Judicial integrity, ethics, morals sacrificed to conceal the injustice cause by Rule 1.6. No redeeming qualities. Rule 1.6 could cause a holocaust and avoid exposure. Kids for Cash in Luzerne County comes immediately to mind.

The only way to bring mandatory lawful injustice to an end is to face it as a nation. The current Attorneys General have the opportunity to act lawfully to address the situation. IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 1.6, THEY TAKE NO ACTION WHICH REVEALS MISCONDUCT AND CORRUPTION.

---

The recent decision and order by Judge Thomas O'Neill demonstrates an understanding of the situation. Yes, I noticed. Well played, your Honor.

When issuing the order to extend the deadline for AG Kane to respond, and further extending the deadline for the remaining responses to 30 days after his decision on AG Kane's motion, Judge O'Neill did not indicate a due date for AG Kane's response. An indefinite hold? It would do no further harm.

That thought is sincerely appreciated and respected.

Todd Krautheim and Terance Healy filed the Challenge on behalf of the United States of America and served it to the Attorneys General of the United States. All 56, because this state law is a national issue. Our cases are special only in that we survive. There are alot of Americans suffering under the injustice of Rule 1.6.

In the name of Thomas Ball of New Hampshire, I pray the court acts with all due haste. The efforts of the Attorneys General should be on what will happen once Rule 1.6 is declared unconstitutional, not on delaying the now inevitable resurrection of justice.

The problem has been discovered and identified and lawfully presented. Ordering AG Kane to provide her response sometime last year would immediately eliminate the injustice caused by Rule 1.6, by default, quietly, and with prevention to address the court. Rule 1.6 style. And the deadline for an appeal has passed. Thank You.

Let's fix this. Rule 1.6 does not affect every legal proceeding. Rule 1.6 should not affect ANY legal proceeding. Never again.