Showing posts with label Philadelphia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Philadelphia. Show all posts

Friday, February 13, 2015

Pennsylvania District Attorneys - No mirrors in that place?

The PA District Attorneys attack the Governor who knows their corruption hidden by Rule 1.6

For whatever reason, they are taking this scrutiny VERY personally. They may revert to the womb when the Rule 1.6 story exposes their violation of the Public Trust for ... 30 years. Professionals, pretend to be Professionals. Their reaction is not surprising - when a bully gets exposed - they often break. Their victims laugh at their behavior. ...and tweet.

cray

@DADaveFreed tweeted:
    Tom Wolf was elected Governor, not King. He is misusing the concept of a death penalty reprieve. @PennsylvaniaDAs will fight this action


Philadelphia DAO @Philly_DAsOfc tweeted:
    ..the ppl most grateful for this "moratorium" on capital punishment are the guiltiest, cruelest, most vicious killers on death row.



Terance Healy @TeranceH tweeted:
    @Philly_DAsOfc @PennsylvaniaDAs INJUSTICE- 30 years Rule 1.6 conceals the violation of the Public Trust & undermines CONSTITUTION #TrustLost



Atop that high horse do they think Rule 1.6 is a cloaking device?

Their press release includes mentions of people already convicted and those not yet tried. They suggest they are saving society while a governor who places a moratorium on the death penalty places people at risk.

The Governor wants to review the list, not remove the Death Penalty. That seems the respectable thing to do...

The District Attorney reaction - not so respectable, and somewhat heavy on the paranoia - but they know the Governor is aware of Rule 1.6 Corruption and Injustice.

THEY MUST KNOW because they have used it to prevent the Attorney General from speaking, or performing investigations and other responsibilities of the Office of the Attorney General.

Seems they were in on the secret - two secret court orders which silenced the AG about an unconstitutional law. They added a grand jury threat and a threat to impeach. There's been no explanation of those secrets. WHY IS NO ONE ASKING ABOUT THE IMPROPRIETY???

When violating a person's constitutional rights, the CLE training has been effective within the Pennsylvania District Attorneys. The Psychology of Confidentiality?? ANSWER: IGNORE THE PERSON and ignore the rule of law.

The District Attorneys have concealed Rule 1.6 corruption and injustice
... which violated the Constitutional rights of Pennsylvanians for 30 years.
... have attacked and threatened PA Attorney General Kathleen Kane while she is ordered MUTE
... they believe the only beneficiaries are people on death row.

People do not give a damn about people in prison. And we in PA have seen some prison abuses... which THEY ALL IGNORED.

THERE IS A HEIGHTENED AWARENESS OF INJUSTICE IN THE US. The District Attorneys are likely IGNORING.

They didn't see the signs... EVERY _______ MATTERS, They were everywhere. The People have noticed the INJUSTICE. Mebbe Y'all need a mirror AND a television.

In recent years, there have been many exonerated from Death row within the US. A review is not out of the question... as a matter of fact, for a Governor who knows the track record on civil rights and constitutional violations of those who purport to 'preserve protect and defend the Constitution" might be inclined for a more aggressive review. Gov Wolf has been in office only a few weeks. He's not ignoring... Enjoy the attention.

District Attorney Problems


Mine started with Bruce Castor ignoring me.
Risa Vetri Ferman ignored the crimes along with the corruption
David Heckler was no help, even once I moved to Bucks county. (Well, evicted, but more on that soon.)
Seth Williams has ignored the crimes and constitutional violations of the court staff.
So has David Heckler and Zane Memeger.
Kathleen Kane was ordered to ignore it... TWICE (LOL, Civil Rights? LOL. WTF.)

The investigation into my life started under Castor and continued under Ferman with advice from Heckler ignored by 3 Attorneys General, and 2 Governors - even where one had been an AG and all the surveillance on the books approved by Superior Court of Philadelphia and off the books handled by private investigators.

Whats a lot of intrusive surveillance shared with judges and your wife and her lawyers and your kids when you are at the lowest pointy in your life, and begging for them to investigate THEIR INVESTIGATION.

With no suicide, and no murders, and no crime prosecuted, what a waste of county resources, and eight years of undermining every aspect of a life. Well, that judge fuk'd you over and everyone had to hide the order and those crimes and the warrants and the crimes etc... Well, we had no excuse - it wasn't personal that your life was annihilated...

Anyway, it all started under Bruce Castor. It's his fault we terrorized you.

THEN, YOU FOUND OUT HOW WE LEGALIZED CORRUPTION AND CRIME AND INJUSTICE. To be honest WE DIDN'T EVEN GET IT. But, it worked like a charm, once ignored, victimized, without rights and no laws to protect you or anything you owned, we just IGNORED EVERYTHING. How did you figure out it was a law?

NEW RULE: DO NOT CHANNEL DA's... it conflicts with humanity and defies logic.

CASTOR PUTS THE DRUNK UNCLE ACT TO SHAME


1901860_646326345414783_384204306_nY'all did see what Bruce Castor had to say... Right? The New Years Eve Manifesto?

“you don’t go to war with a person who spends his/her professional life figuring how to [screw] others…”

The crazy bastard wants to be elected DA again. He attacked Bill Cosby in the media AFTER FAILING TO PROSECUTE HIM, or indict him.

When we know a Montgomery County Grand Jury could indict a ham sandwich if instructed by the DA.

If the allegations are true, Bruce seems to believe them. Bruce Castor left a man on the street to drug & rape 35 women??? Minimum - He oughta get Cosby's endorsement in the new campaign...

CosbyCastor



A CHILLING ASPECT CAME TO MIND WHEN I NOTICED THAT THEY DID NOT INVOKE THEIR USUAL POSTER CHILD FOR PHILADELPHIA.
Could his innocence be revealed... I can't imagine. After terrorizing that cop's wife for 30 years... I always had the feeling that may have been why they didn't execute him. Time will tell.

Wednesday, February 11, 2015

Messages from the hostages to Kathleen Kane

I have reported the judiciary held hostage situation within the Superior Court of Pennsylvania to all proper law enforcement authorities to investigate and prosecute.
    US Attorney Zane Memeger, Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia District Attorney Seth Williams,
    Bucks County District Attorney David Heckler,
    PA Attorney General Kathleen Kane,
    The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, and
    the USPS Postal Inspectors, Philadelphia (Mail Fraud).


They have done NOTHING. They are compromised and leveraged to conceal their participation in the conspiracy to undermine the Judicial Branch of each state Government and the Federal Judiciary. They are members of the organization profiting from the corruption and INJUSTICE.

The hostages have repeated contacted with only one person. One may still have principles - fewer, if any, skeletons in her professional closet - nothing to leverage.

“something that’s been on my mind. But I’m very confident that
the truth will come out and that justice will prevail.”


- Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane



SECRET ORDER


A judge has issued an order to the Attorney General of Pennsylvania which prevents identification of the court, the case and the issue.

The 'unidentified' have ordered the attorney general to conduct no investigation and neglect the responsibilities of the Office of the Attorney General.

These 'unlawful and corrupt' actions impose a personal liability upon the individual for that compromise of principles and law and the Constitution of the United States.

Bear in mind, THAT PERSONAL LIABILITY will be decided by another court - another judiciary held hostage where the failure to compromise could result in the personal loss of EVERYTHING.
(Secure your personal assets. Consider filing for Divorce?)

The judiciary held hostage was coerced to issue an improper and invalid order. A demonstration that 'judicial independence' is compromised.

ANOTHER SECRET ORDER


Another unidentified judge has issued a SECOND ORDER to the Attorney General of Pennsylvania which prevents identification of the court, the case and the issue.

The demands are the same - conduct no investigation and neglect the responsibilities of the Office of the Attorney General while RISKING EVERYTHING KATHLEEN KANE OWNS PERSONALLY.

The hostage judges have issued another improper and invalid example that the Judiciary is undone - no law, no constitution, no ethics, no procedure. No explanation of what has necessitated their pre-emptive efforts. Preventing the unidentified issue before it is presented to the courts. Constitutional separation of powers does not allow for this broad overreach into the authority of the Executive branch.

The judiciary held hostage calling attention to the situation.

GRAND JURY THREAT


A Grand Jury has accused the individual, Kathleen Kane, of compromising grand jury secrecy even where she had not taken any part in the investigation, had not been called to answer questions by that grand jury, and was under no requirement to maintain grand jury secrecy.

The threat of incarceration for actions which violate no law. There are no facts available.

The information available has been 'leaked' by a second grand jury investigating the breach within the earlier one.

A grand jury is widely known as the 'tool of the prosecutor' where a ham sandwich could be indicted upon the simple request of the prosecutor. Indictment is not conviction.

The grand jury has not been assembled lawfully. Yet, 'leaked' portions of a secret presentment attack Kathleen Kane calling for an indictment - BUT pass that responsibility to the District Attorney who indicates the issue will take months to review.

The threat of incarceration - against the freedom of the attorney general is clear. Everything else could not be further obfuscated from public view, applicable law and fact. All delayed to permit speculation which undermines the attorney general who cannot say or do anything while those secret orders are appealed.

THREAT OF IMPEACHMENT


One state legislator persists in the effort seeking to remove the attorney general from her elected office. He has failed to accept that an unconstitutional law is NO LAW, a nullity. He has failed to accept that multiple Federal Courts have indicated the law was unconstitutional. He has failed to accept that the Attorney General is not required by law to compromise her principles to defend a state law which is unconstitutional.

The threat of impeachment is improper. It is misinformation and manipulation of the public based on bigotry and hate. It neglects to indicate that the Attorney General was correct when indicating the law was unconstitutional.

A CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUE OF NATIONAL IMPORTANCE


A constitutional challenge was filed in August 2013 and served upon Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane and the attorneys general of each state to address the unconstitutional collateral affect where a law causes the loss of any protection of the law and the loss of rights secured and protected by the Constitution of the united States.

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct had been improperly enacted into law by the state supreme court where their authority to enact law existed only where their law did not affect the substantive rights of a litigant.

Enacted in 1987 in Pennsylvania, Rule 1.6 Confidentiality has prevented and denied litigants of their rights and the protection of the law while mandating non-disclosure and confidentiality by lawyers and all legal professionals. Every state had enacted the Rules of Professional Conduct into law from 1984 (New Jersey) to 2009 (Maine).

Americans noticed the lapse of the US Constitution, however lawyers and legal professionals were mandated to confidentiality and non-disclosure of the source for unconstitutional acts and INJUSTICE.

A TERRORISTIC DIVORCE


In Montgomery County Pennsylvania, HEALY v HEALY and HEALY v MILLER had appealed to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania for relief from invalid orders which fail to apply the rule of law, and from defective and void orders issued in clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction which have been repeatedly enforced.

The terror inflicted by twenty judges upon the unrepresented non-lawyer defendant was unexplained and without any basis in law. The judiciary annihilated every aspect of his life. Every action had one unifying aspect - the silence.

From 2007 through 2013, every proceeding, every ruling, every action, every failure to follow procedure, law and constitution; every action to conceal information, every false report; every false allegation; every failed investigation by state and federal agencies; EVERYTHING pointed to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality preventing disclosure and permitting acts in the furtherance of fraud which prevented any resolution ever.


    The 'fraud provisions' had been removed from the Rules of Professional Conduct - the code of ethical conduct - lacked ethics, lacked morality, endorsed fraud, prevented any recourse, while demanding non-disclosure and confidentiality (Rule 1.6).


Challenge to the Constitutionality of a State Law


Where the appeals to the Superior Court would present the challenge to the constitutionality of a state law, the Attorney General was notified and prevented from action by a 'secret order... and another secret order. The docket indicates superior court activity which has not been provided - kept 'secret'.

The Attorney General neglected the responsibility for involvement in the matter.

Where an earlier grand jury may have caused information to be removed from the public view, many documents were missing from the court record sent to the Superior Court from the Montgomery County. Requests for the production of the missing items were ignored, and remain unexplained.

Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane recognizing the unconstitutional affect of Rule 1.6, with no necessity to abide by an unconstitutional law for confidentiality and non-disclosure, was SILENCED by an improper secret court order.

And SILENCED further by another secret court order.

And SILENCED further by the threat where anything she said could be alleged to be part of a grand jury investigation.

And SILENCED further by the presentment of 'leaked speculation' and the pending threat of undisclosed documents.

The Proper Authorities


The fraud and forgery of the Central Legal Staff - obstructed violations of procedure, Pennsylvania Law and the US Constitution demonstrated the unconstitutionality of Rule 1.6 within the Superior Court - reported to US Attorney Zane Memeger, Philadelphia District Attorney Seth Williams, Bucks County District Attorney David Heckler, PA Attorney General Kathleen Kane, The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, and the USPS Postal Inspectors (Mail Fraud).

NOTHING... Without obligatory silence per an unconstitutional law? Where only ONE been contacted and ordered to neglect and ignore the responsibilities of their office? Why are ALL neglecting their duty and responsibilities?

The carefully worded statements of Kathleen Kane indicate her awareness of the broader scope of the matter.
    "I am shocked at the level of public corruption.”
    “I am shocked at how deep it goes.
    I am shocked at how powerful it is.
    I have never seen anything like this. It’s breathtaking.
    It has been described by the people familiar with what is happening as shameful.”


    “But, if this can be done to me as Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer of the 5th largest state in the country, I am sickened to think what can and may be done to regular, good people who don’t have the resources that I have to challenge it.”


WHO COULD POSSIBLY DO THIS?


The American Bar Association, and affiliates, who have intervened and intercepted to deny and prevent exposure of their sedition and the resulting INJUSTICE within the state and federal courts..

They are the authors of Rule 1.6 who promoted it to every state and the US Congress and have affiliates in every level and jurisdiction of the state and federal courts.

The membership who profited from INJUSTICE and controlled by members which include the district attorneys and the US attorneys who ignore the complaints of criminal and unconstitutional corruption within the courts - their actions pursuant to unconstitutional Rule 1.6 Non-Disclosure and Confidentiality.

An organization who perverted and twisted the judicial branch of every state government by the requirement of SILENCE while leveraging the shame and humiliation of an egregious violation of the Public Trust to undermine JUSTICE in the United States.

10584105_10152469853859398_6925911722687697300_nAn organization whose members undermined a Constitutional Challenge in the Eastern District Court of Pennsylvania where improper actions had resulted in an unsubstantiated dismissal with no evidence of ANY judicial review resulting in the continuation of unconstitutional actions and INJUSTICE in every state - NATIONWIDE - while solely attributed to the purported actions of Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane.

SET UP ACCOUNTABILITY and THREAT OF LIABILITY


Kathleen Kane, the individual, has been set up and is responsible for concealing and preventing resolution of a national conspiracy to deny the constitutional rights of EVERY American without availability of any immunity.

By its terms, Section 1983 imposes liability without defense on state and local officials who, acting under color of law in their individual capacity, deprive plaintiffs of rights created by the Constitution and federal law.

“Career lawmen think strategically. They don’t go for the immediate gratification of a personal attack, instead preferring to set the board up just right and striking at the precise moment where the object of the attack cannot recover.” - Bruce Castor, Montgomery County Commissioner and former District Attorney in a New Years Eve Manifesto against Attorney General Kathleen Kane.

Kathleen Kane filed for divorce in December 2014, securing her family's assets during an aggressive attack against her principles while indicating “something that’s been on my mind. But I’m very confident that the truth will come out and that justice will prevail.”

I BELIEVE.


I believe that no one involved in this corruption has arrived there of their own will, BUT, once they involved they have no available way of removing themselves from the situation. They are obligated by an unconstitutional law which the are mandated to conceal by law. They also have no standing to challenge the law which did not directly affect their rights.

Don't hate the lawyer. DO HATE the unethical unconstitutioal law by which they must abide and are required to conceal... Where they are permitted to commit fraud to prevent disclosure, there are some who seem mandated to do so. This is a corrupt and unjust law.

Don't hate the judiciary. The undermined judges lost their judicial independence. They were required to sacrifice their integrity. The judges have been humiliated by their corruption and injustice and unconstitutional acts. The independence to make the decision was imaginary where required to conceal prior injustice and corruption.

Judges Lack Jurisdiction/Authority


The lack of judicial independence causes their every decision to have been made without proper jurisdiction. Without lawful authority or power to act, every decision was an act of treason. Plea agreements were preferable to acts of treason which deprived people of their freedom. Plea Agreements - having people put themselves in jail was better than ACTING WITHOUT AUTHORITY. If the people ever found out, there would be ...

The state supreme courts - they blew it. Violating the public trust, they overreached their constitutional authority and enacted unconstitutional and unethical laws into existence. A corrupt law among them prevented them from correcting, acknowledging or resolving their grievous error. Where there was no authority to enact the laws, there was now a mandate to conceal their violation. Those supreme court justices responsible have likely retired and died leaving the judiciary undone, the US Constitution ignored, and the government in jeopardy.

FULL CONTROL OF JUDICIAL BRANCH


The American Bar Association, and affiliate organizations, provided their members with training to intervene, intercept and conceal the corruption and injustice of the undermined judicial branch. The ABA had complete control of the judicial branch. Every lawyer and legal professional under their control with discipline at their sole discretion - well, the sole discretion of THEIR state supreme courts. The lawyers in the legislature, and the judiciary committees, kept the legislators out of the 'business of the courts'.

UNDERMINING THE SHERIFFS


Where not removed entirely from existence, the sheriffs were convinced of diminished responsibilities by lawyers and judges. The Chief Law Enforcement Officer in the county was relegated to taxiing prisoners and providing security of the judges/courtroom. The injustice and corruption of the judges would require they be protected. The sheriffs provided support for the illusion of judicial independence. District Attorneys usurped authority under a title Chief Law Enforcement Professional.

PREVENTING FEDERAL INTERVENTION


The US Congress made a similar error in trust called the McDade-Murtha Amendment. Testimony to Congress was affected by Rule 1.6, those testifying to congress were not permitted by law to provide full information. Indicating the disastrous result while neglecting to reveal that requiring all government attorneys to follow the state 'Rules of Professional Conduct' was blindly ignoring that the ethics laws enacted in the states were not ethical, moral, legal or just. This Amendment prevent the federal government from intervening where the loss of constitutional rights was required to be concealed by Rule 1.6 Confidentiality.

PRO SE LOOPHOLE


The ABA never imagined a Pro Se defendant annihilated by their corruption and injustice would survive to identify, document and expose their sedition to very lawyers and judges compromised and participating in systemic corruption and injustice without reaon or explanation.

Neither did I. BUT, where I was left with no choice but to persevere, I DID.

"Wait until they realize what you have discovered."


I brought the Constitutional Challenge of rule 1.6, the corruption and the loss of integrity to the Judiciary who failed to recognize themselves. The minions intercepted and intervened... a new realization and awareness of their actions which had been previously unexposed. Believing they disposed of the pro se cases because the people were non-lawyers, the staff were obstructing and preventing the only party who could lawfully expose the unconstitutional corruption and injustice AND restore the integrity of the judiciary.

The Court Clerks/Staff provided the persistence of the CONTROLLED corruption and injustice. It was NOT systemic.

CEASE AND DESIST


I notified the American Bar Association, and all affiliates, to cease and desist all operations in September 2014. There has been no response.

I persevere.

JUSTICE IS COMING. EVERY. PERSON. MATTERS.

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

Enforcement Request: Sheriff Bono and Governor Wolf

February 3, 2015

Governor Wolf
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
225 Capitol Bldg
501 North 3rd Street
Harrisburg , PA 17120

Kathleen Kane
Office of the Attorney General
11 N 3rd St
16th Floor, Strawberry Square
Harrisburg , PA 17101

Sheriff Russell J. Bono
Montgomery County Court House
First Floor
P.O. Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404


Under Pennsylvania law, a fraudulent conveyance has occurred with regard to my property at 110 Banbury Avenue, North Wales, PA. I ask your assistance in regaining possession of the property where the judiciary has indicated a lack of jurisdiction to address, resolve or rectify the matter.

Documents recorded with the Montgomery County Recorder of Deeds demonstrate the deficiencies and frauds which occurred during the criminal transaction. Additional documents demonstrating the fraud have been filed with the Prothonotary.

Where a property owner is resident on the property, an Action to Quiet Title would permit the court to address the fraudulent conveyance of the property and rectify/resolve/remove the improperly recorded documents.

Where a property owner is not resident on the property, an Action in Ejectment is required to remove the trespassers from the residence and rectify/resolve/remove the improperly recorded documents.

The Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas has indicated a lack of jurisdiction and improperly dismissed an Action in Ejectment. On Appeal, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania has purportedly affirmed the lower courts decision
without any review of facts; and
without indication or support according to an applicable rule of law; and
without evidence of any judicial review of the issues presented on appeal; and
without any proceedings or hearings on the matter; and
while failing to address the issue of the appeal; and
neglecting every motion properly prepared and filed with the appellate court; and
failing to explain and produce ex parte communications/documents/orders and subsequent manipulation and concealment in the court docket.

The litigation causes lawyers representing the Defendants to be subject to sanctions where they have failed to present any defense; and neglected to offer evidence of proper ownership; and have no justification in law. Their actions have served to delay the resolution of the matter, denying the plaintiff of his home and property while demonstrating a lack of judicial independence and a corruption which adversely affects the integrity of every judge and every court.

The challenge of an unconstitutional law was indicated with evidence demonstrated by actions in the lower court. Additionally, The interception and interference by the legal staff of the Superior Court violate Pennsylvania law, federal law and the US Constitution.

A complaint of the unconstitutional and criminal actions of the court staff has been filed with
United States Attorney Zane Memeger, as the offenses occurred within the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane, as the offenses occurred within Pennsylvania and as required by the Rules of Appellate Procedure the attorney general must be notified where an appeal will challenge the constitutionality of a law.
Philadelphia District Attorney Seth Williams, as the offenses occurred within the city and county of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Bucks County District Attorney David Heckler, as I am a resident of Bucks County, PA.
The United States Postal Inspectors, Philadelphia, as the forged and fraudulent documents attributed to the judiciary were delivered through the use of the US Postal Service.
The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, as the actions violate the Rules of Professional Conduct.

Attorney General Kathleen Kane has been ordered to SILENCE by two secret court orders from two unidentified courts. Where these orders additionally prevent investigation and require an improper negligence for the functions and responsibilities of the Attorney General, Kathleen Kane's failure might be 'explained'. But, what of the others who have neglected their law enforcement responsibilities and participation in a conspiracy to interfere with civil rights (42 USC § 1985, 18 U.S.C. § 241) under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242).

Additionally, the following have been notified of the unconstitutional Pennsylvania law which has been improperly enacted by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania where their authority requires laws 'consistent with [the Pennsylvania] Constitution and neither abridge, enlarge nor modify the substantive rights of any litigant.' PA Constitution Article V Section 10(c)
- Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett
- The Senators and Representatives of the Pennsylvania Legislature
- The elected Sheriffs of Pennsylvania
- The Senators and Representatives of the US Congress
- President Barack Obama
- Pennsylvania Supreme Court Chief Justice Ron Castille

A Constitutional Challenge had been filed in federal district court and served upon the state attorney general in every state and territory, with notice to every state governor, as the same unconstitutional law has been enacted in every state and affects constitutionally protected rights of litigants while denying any protection of the law.

Improperly dismissed after default by every state attorney general, the United States Marshall service was notified along with the US Department of Justice and US Attorney General Eric Holder. An appeal to the Third Circuit Court affirmed the district court's dismissal while unsubstantiated by any dismissal doctrine and neglecting the facts associated with the matter.

Absent any available recourse within the judicial branch to address the theft by fraudulent conveyance of my property;
Having identified and demonstrated the unconstitutional collateral affect of the Rule 1.6 mandated non-disclosure and confidentiality by every legal professional;
With the resulting participation by the above-named persons, and all lawyers and legal professionals, in a conspiracy which denies constitutional rights, obstructing justice and denying the rule of law while neglecting any effort to address, remove or suspend the unconstitutional law;
I seek your assistance to regain possession of the residence which will permit me to file an Action to Quiet Title to resolve and rectify the fraudulent documents filed with the Montgomery County Recorder of Deeds.


Respectfully.

Terance Healy


cc:
Governor Wolf
Pennsylvania Legislature
Pennsylvania Supreme Court
Internet (www.work2bdone.com/live)
Media


Healy v Miller 2013-29976
Healy v Miller 900 EDA 2014

Attachments:
Notice Complaint of Unconstitutional Actions
Letter: Zane Memeger
Letter: Seth Williams
Letter: Kathleen Kane
Letter: David Heckler
Complaint: US Postal Inspectors
Overview of the Constitutional Challenge to Rule 1.6

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

The Penalty for Treason is Death

Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio has acted with deliberate intent and malice in clear absence of jurisdiction. An act of treason which causes all those who enforce her corrupted orders to be guilty of the same crime and the obstruction and denial of constitutionally protected rights.

All those who act to conceal her corruption are active participants in a conspiracy to deny constitutionally protected rights. Even where it is her husband acting under the improper authority of a former Supreme Court Justice.

Ignoring her crimes any further is an injustice which no individual should have to endure and survive.

Even where the Attorney General has been improperly ordered to ignore the law and the criminal corruption of the judiciary.

Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio deserves to die.
She said so herself when campaigning for the position of judge.
Philadelphia Inquirer Judicial Campaign Questionnaire

THIS IS NOT A DEATH THREAT ANYMORE THAN ANYONE WHO POSTS TO THE INTERNET FOR THE DEATH OF ANY REPORTED OFFENDER. THIS IS NOT A DEATH THREAT AGAINST A JUDGE. AS CARLUCCIO WAS NOT ACTING AS A JUDGE WHEN SHE ISSUED HER ORDER FOR WHICH SHE ALSO LACKS JUDICIAL IMMUNITY.

UPDATE: On January 23, 2015 at approx. 3PM two detectives stopped by my mother's home. Their approach was confirming, non-confrontational, non-aggressive, and they were cognizant that the post above was not a threat and was not intended to be a threat. They acknowledged the selection of the words used being deliberate and non-threatening.

They did not indicate who contacted them with concerns about the post.

They indicated they were in the area and thought they would 'check-in' and confirm my perseverance and continuing lawful efforts and approach. I found them to be sincere and invited them to witness the volume of paperwork involved. The paperwork continues.

One of the detectives had identified himself as the detective introduced a few years ago by Nancy Becker, Montgomery County Recorder of Deeds, with her recommendation that the fraudulent conveyance of my home and property be investigated and prosecuted. The detective contacted me about a week later indicating that the District Attorney had instructed him to take no action in the crime.

Friday, January 9, 2015

Kathleen Kane will boldly continue. JUSTICE IS COMING.

The following was reported by WPVI Channel 6 in Philadelphia. The full grand jury document has NOT yet been made public although there has been a great deal of speculation regarding what the grand jury was investigating.

The latest statewide headlines relate to a leak of limited information purported to be in the grand jury report. The leaked information has been used to attack the integrity and character of the Attorney General and suggest she be impeached. The negative effort is unfounded and political consisting of baseless snarky remarks and a state representative who can't let go of the marriage issue.

"I have torn up their questionable contracts, cleaned up their investigations, broke their pornography ring and prosecuted corrupt officials." - Kathleen Kane







PHILADELPHIA (WPVI) -- In a statement released Friday, Kathleen Kane said, "I did nothing illegal. Period." This the day after a grand jury recommended criminal charges against the Pennsylvania attorney general.

The charges include perjury and concern allegations that she leaked confidential grand jury information to a newspaper involving an investigation into a local NAACP leader.

On Friday Kane addressed the grand jury decision in a statement, which reads as follows:

"I did nothing illegal. Period. Any fair and impartial review of the facts would conclude that. This seems to me to be another political attack on my attempt to clean up Harrisburg and its political culture.

They have fought me all the way, including an effort to impeach me.

Since taking office, I have torn up their questionable contracts, cleaned up their investigations, broke their pornography ring and prosecuted corrupt officials.

I will continue to clean up Harrisburg, despite these attacks that seem to be more about politics than the merits."




Kathleen Kane did not mention anything about the following pending issues which may also be related to the Grand Jury Effort.
GRAND-JURY-15074166– About those two secret orders?
– About the two secret courts which issued them?
– About the investigation she is not permitted to conduct?
– About the case she is not permitted to participate in?
– About the actual subject of the grand jury investigation?
– About the corruption mentioned on CNN?

It is reasonable to assume that a Grand Jury which has met for a year might have more to say than the one topic which has been 'leaked'.



A Montgomery County Tradition - THE RETALIATORY PERJURY CHARGE.
The only people who are charged with perjury in Montgomery County are those who find themselves or their cases in a position which confronts the corruption of the Montgomery County or threatens the Power-That-Be.

I can think of only two cases in recent years.
Jim Matthews and Gabriele Drexler

Matthews was a County Commmissioner accused of perjury and arrested by Risa Ferman. The charge was subsequently dropped. AND the record was expunged in 2013. His brother is the host of MSNBC'c HARDBALL, Chris Matthews

Drexler had been coerced into a 'perjury trap'. Her mother's illness was leveraged with a plea through a public defender. She was coerced into a plea agreement BUT jailed anyway. Drexler's case was positioned to expose the county's availability and improper and illegal use of intrusive computer surveillance tools. Her Federal complaint was subsequently dropped.

Her case had been closely followed on this website as there was a question of whether the Grand Jury was ever informed of the capabilities of the county detectives and police to access home computers and modify emails. Her case had been perfectly positioned to expose the misused surveillance software in the county AND in federal court.

Miss Drexler was unaware of how the printed emails in her report failed to agree with the documents on her computer. The surveillance and remote control software tools which would have been available to the officer involved in her case could possibly have explained the discrepancy.

It is unlikely that Drexler was ever aware that her case risked exposing the county's improper surveillance tools and efforts in a time before Edward Snowden's worldwide revelation. I was a victim of their software tools, as was the Lower Merion High Schoolers who discovered that stealth surveillance software installed on their laptops had been taking thousands of pictures without their knowledge. The County had advised the school of the software.

Perjury is ignored in the Family Courts... even in custody. Custody Master Sarah Goren had indicated to me at one time that if the District Attorney were to prosecute perjury in Family court there would always be a line at the courthouse. SO... They just ignore it.

I suppose it is just another of those strategies available to District Attorneys which Bruce Castor wrote about on New Years Eve.
"You don’t go to war with a person who spends his/her professional life figuring how to [screw] others…”

JUSTICE IS COMING.

Wednesday, December 17, 2014

Interest in this letter?

There seems to be an increased interest in this letter from around the web.

Letter to District Attorney Risa Ferman

The DA ignored it completely. A clear demonstration of no protection of the law.

The judges neglected and failed to enforce my wife to comply with ANY court order. Usually where compliance would reveal her private telephone, the private investigator, the surveillance software company, provide medical benefits, permit me to see my children.

The alternative was aggressive enforcement of EVERY court order, where I proved the fraud of Angst & Angst each time. They would lie about statements on court orders and then attempt to enforce their fiction.

Their intrusive technology was detected and reported and recorded... BUT there was no way to end the terror. It still continues to affect my devices and those of my friends.

There were indications that the page had been hacked and was not being displayed. Hopefully I have corrected the issue.

The May 2009 letter had a wide distribution. I never imagined I would still be battling these idiots for the remainder of my life.

cc:
CNN – NEWDESK, One CNN Center, Atlanta, GA 30303
ABC News, 7 West 66th Street, New York, NY 10023
NBC News, 30 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, N.Y. 10112
CBS Television, 51 West 52nd Street, New York, NY 10019

WPVI-TV/DT – NEWSDESK, 4100 City Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19131
NBC-10 News Line, 10 Monument Rd, Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004
CBS 3 – NEWSDESK, 1555 Hamilton Street, Philadelphia, PA 19130
FOX 29 – NEWSDESK, 330 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106
CW Philly 57-WPSG-TV – NEWSDESK, 1555 Hamilton St, Philadelphia, PA 19130
KYW Newsradio 1060: News Department, 400 Market St, Philadelphia, PA 19106

The Inquirer – NEWSDESK, 400 N. Broad St., Philadelphia, PA 19130
Daily News – NEWS DESK, 400 N. Broad St., Philadelphia, PA 19130
Intelligencer, 333 N Broad St, Doylestown, PA 18901
Reporter, 307 Derstine Ave, Lansdale, PA 19446
The Times Herald, 410 Markley St, Norristown, PA 19401

Governor Edward G. Rendell
225 Main Capitol Building
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120

Tom Corbett
Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General
16th Floor, Strawberry Square
Harrisburg, PA 17120

Hon. Kate Harper
1515 Dekalb Pike Suite 106
Blue Bell, PA 19422

Hon. Rick Taylor
701 Horsham Road
Suite 101
Horsham, PA 19044

Stewart J. Greenleaf
Senate District 12
711 York Road
Willow Grove, PA 19090

Allyson Y. Schwartz
U.S. Representative
706 West Avenue
Jenkintown, PA 19046

Robert P. Casey, Jr.
393 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Arlen Specter
711 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

President Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Sunday, November 30, 2014

Disinformation Tactics - Grand Jury

DISINFORMATION TACTICS #21.

Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body.

Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion.

Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled.

For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed an unavailable to subsequent investigators.

Once a favorable verdict (usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim) is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed.




The Norristown Grand Jury could be acting to subvert and conceal evidence in Healy v Healy.

By silencing Kathleen Kane and preventing an investigation by the Attorney General.

By using Judge Carolyn Carluccio's husband as the Special Prosecutor who guides the Grand Jury.

The Grand Jury supervised by Judge Carpenter who was behind the perjury trap sprung on a victim of intrusive illegal surveillance tools available to the county which provided access to computers and permitted evidence to 'change'.

Where a Court order issued preventing Attorney General Kathleen Kane from speaking about the case.

Where a Mystery document was sent to the Superior Court. The Court responded. Yet, the document and response has not been provided or made available to the litigants.

Could this be ONE of the Secret Court Orders issued to silence Kathleen Kane?

Counting back the days from the story of her attorneys filing an Appeal in the matter aligns the secret order with the timeline of the Superior Court Response.

There is the issue of impropriety and bias in the Superior Court, where the documents being sent from the court lack signatures and go on to violate MOST IF NOT ALL of the Judicial Canons.

There is the as yet unspoken issue of the Superior Court not recusing when their direct involvment in the harrassment actions in Healy v Healy was realized.

If the Superior Court of Philadelphia had recused their would be an explanation necessary which could reveal fraud to conceal prior fraud in the matter.

It seems that The Superior Court handles Wire Taps... so if Montgomery County was seeking to tap my phones they would have had to have it authorized by the Superior Court.

As I was not engaged in illegal activity, the surveillance actions can clearly be exposed as designed to harrass, threaten, intimidate and terrorize. While trying to set me up to commit a crime.

The Superior Court in Philadelphia should have recused, BUT couldn't where it would reveal truth... and liabilities.

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality and Mandate of Non-disclosure has caused the entire course of justice to become UNDONE, subverted, perverted and twisted to the point where the court exist ONLY to terrorize the litigant/Defendant/Appellant.

The drive to mislead, misinform and misdirect which is demonstrated in EVERY responsive action suggests that those behind the denial of my constitutional rights while concealed by Rule 1.6 Confidentiality would sooner commit further crimes, than to resolve any issue.

Rule 1.6 affects the actions of EVERY LEGAL PROFESSIONAL - so that explains their lack of facts and law to support any of their actions, or interceptions, while preventing the judiciary from hearing the matter - or maybe even knowing about it.

BUT, AS LEGAL PROFESSIONALS THEY KNOW THAT THE CONSTITUTION IS BEING IGNORED... and Judges and Lawyers are supposed to take action when they see things like that happen. What are they waiting for?


I'm going to try to break Kathleen Kane out of the cone of silence the courts have placed around her.

There's still a few loopholes in Rule 1.6

Friday, November 14, 2014

Motion for the Applicable Rule of Law

Filed in Superior Court - PDF version

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA








Sonya Healy:
(Appellee): # 1330 EDA 2013
 :
v. :
 :
Terance Healy:
(Appellant):


MOTION FOR THE APPLICABLE RULE OF LAW


When the Appellant presented one unstapled original and a copy of a NOTICE / COMPLAINT of UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTIONS to the Prothonotary of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on November 7, 2014, with the request that ten (10) original copies presented at the same time be time stamped by the clerk for distribution in this matter.

THE REQUEST WAS DENIED.

The clerk for at the Prothonotary window indicated that only 4 copies could be stamped.

Appellant respectfully requests, the Rule of Law, the Pennsylvania Statute, the Rule of Appellate Procedure or the procedure within the Internal Operating Procedures of the Superior Court which prevents the clerk from the 10 second task of time-stamping original copies for distribution in this matter.

Where the document (NOTICE/COMPLAINT) being filed that day was indicating the fraud in the furtherance of a fraud being committed in violation of the Constitutional rights of the Appellant, Appellant appends this additional action to the list of intentional and deliberate actions by the Prothonotary and Central Legal Staff of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.


Respectfully,
Terance Healy

Motion for Corrections to the Docket

Filed in Superior Court - PDF version
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA








Terance Healy:
(Appellant): # 900 EDA 2014
 :
v. :
 :
David Miller
Jennifer K. Miller
:
(Appellee):


MOTION FOR CORRECTIONS TO THE DOCKET


ISSUE #1
The Docket in this matter incorrectly indicates that the Appellant Brief was filed on September 3, 2014, where the brief had been filed on September 2, 2014.

Copy of Time Stamped First page attached.

Appellant requests the correction of the Docket.


ISSUE #2
The Docket in this matter incorrectly indicates that on October 7, 2014 “Reproduced Record Filed Late”

Copy of Docket attached.

Where there is no requirement for a Pro Se In Forma Pauperis to file any Reproduced Record indicated within the Rules of Appeallate Procedure, nor is any time requirement indicated, Appellant respectfully requests the correction of the docket to more correctly indicate “Reproduced Record Filed”

Respectfully,
Terance Healy

Motion for Proposed Course of Action Towards Resolution

Filed in Superior Court - PDF Version
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA








Terance Healy:
(Appellant): # 900 EDA 2014
 :
v. :
 :
David Miller
Jennifer K. Miller
:
(Appellee):


MOTION FOR PROPOSED COURSE OF ACTION TOWARDS RESOLUTION


The Appellant hereby informs the court of the entry of an unsigned MEMORANDUM (annotated copy attached) where the integrity of this Honorable Court has been affected by a clearly evident and apparent refusal to address or acknowledge that the lower court lacked jurisdiction and authority to issue the procedurally defective and void ab initio Order dated May 9, 2011.

Where referring to the defective and void ab initio order as a 'divorce decree' foolishly avoids and fails to address or resolve the well-documented procedural defect;

Where Appellant at every opportunity has presented, documented and petitioned the court for resolution, yet every opportunity has been deliberately and intentionally neglected and ignored by the court;

Where the failure of every party who has presented, or asserted, the defective and void order for enforcement has neglected to provide any of the requisite information demonstrating proper and valid support of jurisdiction – as none exists;

Where the evidence which demonstrates the defect and the resulting lack of jurisdiction under Pennsylvania Law is clear upon the court record, well-documented within the petitions and briefs filed, and demonstrated by the exhibits and sworn testimony to the Court;

Where each judge has deliberately and intentionally neglected, avoided and ignored the procedurally defective lack of jurisdiction within their subsequent orders and opinions;
-- Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio Opinion dated October 18, 2011
-- Judge Garrett Page Opinion dated June 28, 2013
-- Judge Gail Weilheimer Opinion dated July 18, 2014

Where there is no method by which jurisdiction may be provided retroactively;

The Appellant respectfully requests to be advised of the intended course of action of this court toward a resolution to the matter;

It is not acceptable to foolishly disrespect the litigants and further sacrifice the integrity of the judiciary.

The lower court's deliberate neglect and failure to address the defect and the resulting lack of jurisdiction demonstrates that their judicial independence had been compromised and justice undermined throughout the matter. The egregious abuse of power under color of law by the members of the Montgomery County Judiciary can only be described as a farce. A very cruel farce.

Failing to address the lower courts reprehensible and systemic lapse in integrity does nothing to absolve the judiciary of responsibility for their actions or to resolve the damage and harm caused to their victim.

Yes, I know what the lower court has done. I survived the abuse. I am attempting to escape it.

I am prevented from life while any resolution is prevented.

I have no choice but to proceed through the only course of action which is available to me while experiencing a systemic failure of judicial integrity and independence.

My constitutional rights have been denied. I have no protection of the law.

Every possible recourse has been prevented by a law which has tragically made it mandatory for legal professionals to participate in furtherance of fraud against the victim of fraud while preventing any resolution. The judiciary has been undermined and judicial independence has been compromised.

Removing the 'fraud provisions' from the Kutak Commission's ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct made fraud legal and mandatory and prevented disclosure to rectify the fraud.

Concealing a mandate for fraud in a document which purports to be an 'ethical standard for legal professionals' neither makes the fraud legal, nor ethical, nor constitutional.

I did not choose to be abused to the point where a systemic problem would be exposed demonstrating the usurpation of the authority of the judicial branch and a judiciary held hostage and controlled by the American Bar Association and their affiliated organizations.

I have had no choice. I survived.

Justice Delayed is justice denied.

Respectfully,
Terance Healy

Friday, November 7, 2014

Motion for Reconsideration of Oral Argument

Filed in Superior Court - PDF Version

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA








Terance Healy:
(Appellant): # 900 EDA 2014
 :
v. :
 :
David Miller
Jennifer K. Miller
:
(Appellee):


MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORAL ARGUMENT



Appellant respectfully requests reconsideration of the opportunity to present an oral argument in this matter.

Where the Appellee through their Brief has neglected to provide or demonstrate any validity of the jurisidiction of the Court to issue the Order presented to this Court in support of ownership;

Where the Appellee through their Brief have neglected and failed to address any of the elements of jurisdiction which have been demonstrated to be lacking and which cause their asserted order to be procedurally defective and void;

Where the Appellee through the statements of their attorney in court have neglected and failed to address any of the elements of jurisdiction which have been demonstrated to be lacking and which cause their asserted order to be procedurally defective and void;

and

Where a NOTICE/COMPLAINT OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTIONS, copy attached, has been filed with this Court by the Appellant.

Appellant requests reconsideration of the opportunity to present his argument with the court in this matter.

Respectfully

Terance Healy

Thursday, October 30, 2014

NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF SIGNED DOCUMENTS

Filed in Superior Court - PDF Version
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA








Sonya Healy:
(Appellee): # 1330 EDA 2013
 :
v. :
 :
Terance Healy:
(Appellant):


NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF SIGNED DOCUMENTS


I, TERANCE HEALY, upon request at the Prothonotary of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia for signed copies of the MEMORANDUM which has been attributed to “Donohue, J.” filed in this matter on October 27, 2014 WAS DENIED that request.

The APPELLANT respectfully requests judicial notice of the deception of a MEMORANDUM entered in this matter without the signatures of the judiciary.

The APPELLANT additionally calls attention to ALL activity within the appeal of this matter (#1330 EDA 2013) which has been accomplished by the staff of the court without any indication of the involvement or signature of any member of the judiciary of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

The APPELLANT wishes to notify this Honorable court of the OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE which is taking place within the court staff of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

RESPECTFULLY,

Terance Healy



FILED IN PERSON ON OCTOBER 30, 2014
FILED IN PERSON AS FEDERAL COMPLAINT at US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE in PHILADELPHIA - OCTOBER 30, 2014

Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Motion for Reconsideration

Filed in Superior Court - PDF Version
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA








Sonya Healy:
(Appellee): # 1330 EDA 2013
 :
v. :
 :
Terance Healy:
(Appellant):


MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION


In the unsigned MEMORANDUM filed October 27, 2014, NO EVIDENCE OF JURISDICTION for the lower court to issue the defective and void Order of May 9, 2011 is addressed, affirmed, available, asserted, authenticated, authorized, achieved, accomplished, attained, concluded, cited, confirmed, created, corroborated, discerned, determined, declared, earned, effectuated, enacted, endorsed, established, excused, filed, found, furnished, gained, granted, inherent, maintained, managed, offered, presented, provided, permitted, professed, pronounced, produced, ratified, substantiated, settled, served, supported, transmitted, unnecessary or waived.

Jurisdiction, when challenged, must be proven, not imagined.

The lack of jurisdiction for the lower Court to issue the defective and void Order of May 9, 2011 has erroneously been COMPLETELY IGNORED AND NEGLECTED by this Honorable and Superior Court.

Terance Healy (Appellant) has presented the evidence contained within the court record of the procedural defects which result in a lack of jurisdiction.

Sonya Healy (Appellee), represented by Angst & Angst, has at no time ever provided the court with evidence of proper jurisdiction and has ignored the challenge to the jurisdiction of the Court.

ANGST & ANGST have litigated by providing further issues and failures which exacerbate and demonstrate their complete disregard for procedure, process, and law; conducting ex parte communications with the court; then successfully leveraging their improper activities with the result affecting the integrity of the court. The chaotic disinformation tactics used by Angst & Angst to conceal their fraud upon the court since 2007, have been documented, demonstrated, evidenced and yet ignored by the entire Montgomery County Bench.


Where this Honorable court has added to the 'procedural quagmire' by failing to address the issue of jurisdiction,

Appellant demands the Superior Court to produce a true and correct statement of evidence proving all elements of jurisdiction for the Order of May 9, 2011 which completely and lawfully addresses the specific defects already documented by the Appellant and not citing collateral and irrelevant law which only serves to distract from the issue.

- or -

WHERE support of jurisdiction is lacking, is unavailable, does not exist, and/or has never been presented by any court, nor any Appellee, nor any attorney at ANGST & ANGST,

Appellant demands the Superior Court to strike the Order of May 9, 2011 as VOID AB INITIO;

and

Appellant demands the Superior Court to strike all subsequent orders issued which are affected by the defective and void Order of May 9, 2011 as VOID AB INITIO;

and

Appellant demands the Superior Court to immediately set aside the Memorandum of October 27, 2014;

and

Appellant respectfully requests twenty certified copies of those Orders for use in other pending matters where the defective and void order has been improperly and illegally presented and enforced.

Respectfully,

Terance Healy

FILED IN PERSON - OCTOBER 30, 2014.

Tuesday, September 9, 2014

Friday, August 22, 2014

Response to US Attorney

August 22, 2104

U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorneys

RE: Your letter dated August 19, 2014 (Attached)

A package was hand delivered to the Philadelphia US Attorney’s office and we asked for a meeting. The attached response is inappropriate, unsigned, on questionable letterhead and completely neglects the issue to be discussed.

The game of making certain there is no way to know to whom we should follow up is tiresome. Why is the United States Attorney playing with people asking for help? And why is the issue no longer the relevant one, but the impossibility of meeting to discuss a federal crime?

Your reply indicates that that the US Attorney “is responsible for the prosecution of persons accused of violating federal laws”. The Constitution of the United States is a federal law. Rights secured by the constitution have been violated, personally and to millions across the nation.

The Pennsylvania Judiciary has violated the Constitution of the United States leaving the courts undermined by a rule enacted by the state supreme court which additionally violates the Pennsylvania Constitution. The same rule undermines the federal courts. The package of letters provided exposed this issue with clear examples.

If your office is also following the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct and as lawyers you are obligated to conceal the crime because it adversely affects the integrity of the judiciary, then indicate that truth and recognize it as the problem to be addressed.

Acknowledge the mandate requiring all lawyers to ignore judicial corruption and injustice, and acknowledge that the judicial branch of state and federal government has been undermined by one rule put forth by the American Bar Association which has undermined the United States Constitution in every court in the country.

The Department of Justice indicates the US Attorney is the appropriate contact.

A meeting is requested to discuss the issue and the criminal actions which have occurred to prevent exposure and resolution of this national issue.

Respectfully,

Terance Healy
Todd Krautheim

( PDF version )

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

Genuine Title

Your lawyer is bragging about the injustice of the Weilheimer decision. Seriously?

How laughable that a lawyer in a large Philadelphia law firm records his 2014 successes - TWO - and the one entry is based on corruption and fraud with no support in law and an appeal is pending.

Your lawyer wasn't representing the Millers.* The Millers didn't even bother to show up. If the Millers had shown up maybe they could explain that "Weilheimer for Judge" sign on the lawn? Judge Weilheimer couldn't explain it.* Are we supposed to believe that in a local election, people believe so much in a candidate that they do not know and have never met that they seek out and obtain a sign supporting their election?

The lawyer failed to address the essential issue.** The lack of jurisdiction of the order they were seeking to enforce.** No mention of anything which supported jurisdiction in the entire transcript.** Yet the lack of jurisdiction was proven beyond any doubt on the court record... AND COMPLETELY IGNORED BY JUDGE WEILHEIMER.***

In the Appeal, Judge Weilheimer delayed 5 months in issuing her opinion. Justice delayed is justice denied. In her opinion she neglects to offer any support for the jurisdiction of the defective and void order.***

YET, THE LAWYER IS BRAGGING ABOUT THIS 'WIN' ON THE COMPANY WEB SITE. The lawyer who neglected to reveal that his client was Genuine Title Company.**** He never met the Defendants.

Bragging about the deliberate infliction of injustice. A big win - still pending appeal. A pathetic display of arrogance in the face of judicial corruption and injustice. Keeping a man homeless and destitute for a prolonged period while trying to regain his rightful property after enduring constant litigation since 2007.

* Rule 1.6 - Confidentiality of client identity
** Rule 1.6 - Do not adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary
*** Rule 1.6 - Do not self incriminate. Do not adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary.
**** Rule 1.6 - Confidentiality of client identity

Ejectment Action Against Homeowners Dismissed - April 9, 2014

zarwin


Is this posted on your mother's fridge?

Tuesday, July 29, 2014

Letter to Senator Toomey (and Senator Casey too)

July 28, 2014

U.S. Senator Patrick J. Toomey
Eight Penn Center
1628 JFK Blvd, Suite 1702
Philadelphia, PA 19103

U.S. Senator Robert P. Casey, Jr.
2000 Market Street, Suite 610
Philadelphia, PA 19103

Senators,

Please permit us to update you with a document sent to President Obama. A draft of which had already been provided to you on June 18, 2014.

While we can never be certain that our correspondence reaches the President, we again ask that you present the issue directly to the President and to the U.S. Congress.

We would appreciate the opportunity to meet with you both to discuss the matter.

We do understand that Senator Casey, as an attorney obligated to take no action in this matter, may continue to deny any meeting requests. One would hope that Senator Casey would be eager to be involved considering his fathers involvement as the Governor of Pennsylvania when the law was improperly and unconstitutionally enacted. In any case we will continue to keep Senator Casey informed so that he is permitted to make his own decisions in regard to taking action to address judicial corruption and injustice.

A meeting to update status of your actions and further actions we are taking would be appreciated. Please contact Todd Krautheim at (215) 290-XXXX.

Sincerely,

Terance Healy
Todd M. Krautheim

Cc: Philip Innamorato
Kurt Imhof

PDF Letter
PDF Letter to President
PDF Attachment

Monday, June 30, 2014

Interbranch Commission on Juvenile Justice

Arrogant, self-serving and pretentious demonstrations of judicial theater lends neither sincerity or credibility to a commission which neglects their mandate and avoids objectives.
The Rules of Professional Conduct – Rule 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION mandate confidentiality of information where the information
- would adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary,
- would reveal misconduct of their own office,
- would expose individual liability,
- would adversely affect their client.


Rule 1.6 collaterally denies and prevents rights and privileges protected by the United States Constitution; prevents equal protection of the law; and obstructs justice and any resolution of the matters where the mandated confidentiality prevents an independent review of facts.

The victim is NOT MANDATED to silence by the Rules of Professional Conduct; however, the 'system' personnel - judges, lawyers, district attorneys, attorneys general, prosecutors, public defenders, etc - are MANDATED by Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information and face aggressive disciplinary action (including sanctions, suspension, and disbarrment) where confidentiality is breached.

Best demonstrated by the disciplinary actions against Judge Ann Lokuta after she requested the FBI investigation. Ann Lokuta was removed from the bench and may never hold any judicial office again. The Commission neglected to interview her for their report.


A Commission of judges and legal professionals failed to recognize that their MANDATED confidentiality was the reason for the silence and the cause of the breakdown of justice.

Statements by the Commission chairman in October and November of 2009 include the following... annotated in the boxes below the each statement to include and reinforce information which the Commission failed to report.




October 14, 2009

It is our intention to shine light onto some very dark days of the Pennsylvania judiciary – days that have disrupted the lives of children and their families; brought shame to an entire community; and sewn seeds of distrust throughout the legal system.

The deliberate failure of the commission to assign responsibility for the failure of the justice system to the one 'law' which enabled it and prevented any justice or actions to address the judicial corruption and injustice fertilizes the "seeds of distrust" and strikes at the sincerity and integrity of the commission.


Our concern, however, is not only the action of two Luzerne County judges. Our concern is also the inaction of others. Inaction by judges, prosecutors, public defenders, the defense bar, public officials and private citizens -- those who knew but failed to speak; those who saw but failed to act.

The commission fails to see themselves among "those who knew but failed to speak; those who saw but failed to act." The commission fails to address their silence, while misdirecting blame to include public officials and private citizens who did speak and were ignored; who did act and were dismissed.


[ Inaction includes the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania who ignored and dismissed Kings Bench Petitions regarding the corruption and injustice without consideration or review. ]

All of those involved -- whether by action, inaction or silence -- whether by willful choice or benign ignorance -- engaged in an assault on the fairness and impartiality of our legal system. It was an assault on the very rule of law.

Only those persons mandated by the Rules of Professional Conduct were denied any willful choice or benign ignorance while forced to participate in the conspiracy which undermined justice, the law and the US Constitution.


This is a serious matter indeed, because an attack on the rule of law is an attack on
democracy itself. The sense of community that underlies democratic government is sustained by the sure faith that law will be applied uniformly and fairly, without fear or favor, or corruption.

A very dramatic statement. Judicial theater which suggests high moral values yet performed to conceal the cause of malicious injustice and judicial corruption demonstrates a profound lack of sincerity and integrity.


Judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys serve as officers of the court, servants of the high calling of the pursuit of justice. When that noble service is diverted to improper ends, however, we all suffer the consequences.

Those who accept the HIGH CALLING OF THE PURSUIT OF JUSTICE have a mandate which shamefully requires them to ignore corruption, injustice, equal protection of the law, and the US Constitution, EVERYONE SUFFERS THE CONSEQUENCES of their participation in the crimes.


But, we must remember it is not only members of the Bar who are called to pursue justice. Every citizen bears that burden, every citizen shares that responsibility, because in a democracy the pursuit of justice is the essence of civic obligation.

The members of the Bar have undermined and usurped the authority of the judiciary in every level of the courts, concealed it in a mandate of confidentiality, and prevent, obstruct and deny the citizens any opportunity to present or resolve the loss of their constitutional rights. The commission is again assigning blame to the citizens who did act, only to have their efforts suppressed, ignored and dismissed.


[ The arrogant failure of the commission and the courts to address the citizens reports of injustice and corruption absolves the public of any blame or responsibility where those reports were subsequently ignored by the broken judicial system. ]



November 9, 2009

Our focus is on what happened in the juvenile justice system – what went wrong and what can be done about it.

The SILENCE was wrong. The mandated confidentiality can be removed.


The practical reality is that those who may be motivated by greed and the drive for power are not likely to be deterred by any laws, rules or regulations that we recommend or which may ultimately be adopted. That is the nature of criminality.

The Judiciary acting criminally in defiance of law, and ignoring the constitutional rights of the people ENACTED THE MANDATE OF CONFIDENTIALITY WHICH CONCEALED THEIR CORRUPTION AND INJUSTICE. Any new law or reform will be moot while the mandated Rule 1.6 confidentiality remains.


None of us should hold any illusions that the recommendations of one more commission, or the creation of one more regulatory agency, or the enactment of one more law, or the adoption of one more rule of court will prevent this from ever happening again. The fact is that there were laws, and rules of juvenile procedure, and administrative regulations already in
place that could have stopped or prevented these abuses.

The United States Constitution and the Pennsylvania Constitution are the laws which discourage the judiciary from corruption, injustice and abuses of power.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court does not have the authority to enact any 'law' which causes substantive rights protected by the US Constitution or Pennsylvania Constitution to be abridged, modified or denied.

In October 1987, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court enacted the Rules of Professional Conduct into 'law'. Rule 1.6 - Confidentiality of Information can subject a person to a collateral denial of substantive rights and privileges protected by the US Constitution and the Pennsylvania Constitution with the resultant injustice not permitted to be addressed and resolved by any court.

Any effort or actions to remove Rule 1.6 would expose the error by the Supreme Court adversely affecting the integrity of the judiciary and is not lawful when mandated by the Rules of Professional Conduct.


THE CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE OF RULE 1.6 was filed on August 8, 2013 in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and served on fifty six state attorneys general.. The federal courts have improperly denied jurisdiction. The matter is being prepared for submission to the Supreme Court of the United States and concurrently to the United States Congress seeking a constitutional amendment.


How do we create a system in which those who see corruption call the police?

Direct police to accept criminal reports against judges by removing the RULE 1.6 mandate for the District Attorney to ignore the crime.


How do we create a system in which prosecutors who see a judge flagrantly disregard the law make a report to the Judicial Conduct Board?

Remove the Rule 1.6 mandate requiring confidentiality where the information will adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary.

Judicial corruption and injustice will ALWAYS adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary.

A conspiracy which conceals the judge's crime will ALWAYS adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary.

JUSTICE NEVER ADVERSELY AFFECTS THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIARY.


How do we create a system in which the Judicial Conduct Board can respond quickly and effectively to allegations of misconduct?

Direct the Judicial Conduct Board to review every allegation of misconduct. The policy of dismissing ANY report of misconduct while purporting a necessity of judicial integrity demonstrates flawed logic.

The judiciary has demonstrated a complete and absolute lack of integrity, ethics or morals with regard to their deliberate abuse of power under color of law.

Judicial integrity cannot be repaired by concealing that it may not even exist.


How can we develop a system in which we select and educate our juvenile court judges so that glib sloganeering -- and using phrases like “zero tolerance” -- is not mistaken for thoughtful judicial reflection?

Remove Rule 1.6. Then, review matters independently and deliver Justice in accordance with the law.


How do we create a system in which lawyers, whose unique role it is to advance justice and protect liberty, actually uphold the great traditions of an honored profession?

Remove Rule 1.6. A mandatory participation in a conspiracy which denies and obstructs justice in the furtherance of judicial corruption IS NOT AN GREAT TRADITION.

It does NOT advance justice.

It does NOT protect liberty.


We have asked ourselves whether it is possible that people can persuade themselves there is nothing they can do to correct what they know to be wrong.




When the court enacts the law which leaves a person with nothing they can do to correct what they know to be wrong, the courts actions could reasonably be interpreted as persuasive.

Seriously??? The commission insults the thousands of victims of the judicial corruption and injustice ignored by the courts and every level of law enforcement CAUSED BY AND CONCEALED BY an improperly enacted state law which mandates that legal professionals take no action which adversely affects the integrity of the judiciary under threat of aggressive disciplinary action.

Is it possible that judges can persuade themselves that there is nothing they can do to correct what they know to be wrong?

Any judge, attorney general, district attorney or lawyer could have acted to expose the unconstitutional injustice and corruption of the judiciary. Protected by the full might of the US Constitution, Rule 1.6 - repugnant to the US Constitution is a nullity.

There can be no law which requires anyone to violate the rights and privileges of the People which are secured and protected by the US Constitution.

EVERY Judge knows this. EVERY Lawyer knows this.

The justice system IS broken. The judiciary has shown an insecurity to accept responsibility and resolve matters where the integrity of a judge would be adversely affected.

The judiciary neglects consideration or recognition of responsibility for the harm and irreparable damage to the litigant caused by a denial of constitutional rights, a failure to follow the rule of law, and the resultant injustice.

The judiciary shirks their responsibility with the knowledge that on appeal, their ruling will be affirmed and affect the integrity of the appeals court and continue the injustice.

The judiciary fails to recognize that injustice does not end injustice. It extends it.

Once the matter has been perverted by injustice, the rule of law, procedure, case law or precedent can be manipulated and misrepresented to substantiate any decision by the higher court while masking if any review of the issues presented on appeal had occurred.

Rule 1.6 has been unconstitutionally enacted by the state supreme courts without any review of the impact on constitutional rights of litigants.

Rule 1.6 shows that judicial independence once undermined continues to be undermined without any lawful ability for a litigant to address the bias of the court.

The American Bar Association has undermined the authority of state and federal courts and has demonstrated the ability to control courts and judges so insecure about their lack of integrity that they will sadistically continue to perpetuate an injustice upon a litigant whom they have wronged and treated unfairly.

When the American Bar Association provided the Model Rules of Professional Conduct to each state judiciary to carelessly promulgate and enact without review, the mechanism by which they gained control of each insecure state judiciary was a mandate of confidentiality to protect the integrity of the undermined judiciary. Simultaneously concealing the ABA conspiracy to undermine and usurp the authority of the judiciary in every court in the nation and to aggressively enforce every breach of confidentiality thus concealing their sedition of the judiciary at every state and federal level.
IT IS NOT POSSIBLE THAT TERANCE HEALY PERSUADED HIMSELF THAT THERE IS NOTHING HE CAN TO TO CORRECT WHAT HE KNOWS TO BE WRONG.

Review his experience in the following paragraphs. PERSEVERANCE.


The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 demonstrates the deliberate judicial corruption and injustice which terrorized ONE LITIGANT for over 8 years appearing before 20 judges of the Montgomery County Pennsylvania Judiciary where the integrity of each subsequent judge was sacrificed to conceal the corruption and injustice of the prior judges...

- where an order issued by a judge, the head of the family court division, who had never been assigned to the matter and had never conducted any proceeding in the matter, was prevented from the defendant and kept in a confidential file apart from the actual case file...

- where the existence of the order was not known to the defendant and was prevented from him, the 'secret'order was used to further leverage favorable rulings with subsequent judges while avoiding compliance with every court order without fear of sanction or any negative affect for the plaintiff's failure and the continued failure to follow every court, which the court neglected to enforce at any time. This was in strong contradiction and contrast to the aggressive and meticulously detailed enforcement of every court order which required action by the defendant even where the court lacked jurisdiction to issue the order and neglected to address the lack of jurisdiction when challenged...

- where that order had been fraudulently misrepresented to the police during the commission of a burglary of the residence, in violation of exclusive use and occupancy clause of an Agreed Order signed by the Court, where police permitted the theft to continue after being summoned to the residence by neighbors suspicious of the 20 people and 12 trucks and SUVs who descended upon the residence when the defendant had left for the evening...

- where that order had been presented to the Court during a short list conference where the Defendant was denied the opportunity to read, review or obtain a copy of the document, and where the judge failed to correct the issue when brought to his immediate attention...

- where the existence of the document had been denied when requested in discovery requests, discovery motions, hearings regarding motions to compel production of documents...

- where in August 2010, a clerk in the Prothonotary, upon request by the defendant for the file for the matter, inadvertently offered a folder never previously provided which included among other documents, an 'original' court order signed by Judge Rhonda Daniele where the document lacked any markings indicating proper recording on the docket and filing with the Prothonotary, and where the document lacked any markings indicating proper distribution to the parties, and where the document accurately matched the description by the police of the document presented during the burglary of the residence years before, and further presented to police to mislead, misinform and slander the defendant's effort to enforce custody orders.

- where defendant had been denied and prevented from any proceeding to address custody and visitation, based on the deliberate actions of court personnel who were aware of the 'secret' order and maintained confidentiality to protect the integrity of the judiciary while denying a father from any contact with his sons and any ability to arrange for custody and/or visitation... Defendant was prevented from any relationship with his sons based on a 'secret' order issued without a hearing which slandered his character and reputation and was issued without the proper jurisdiction of the court.

- where, when the conspiracy, corruption and leveraged extortion were documented and presented, the court acted in furtherance of the injustice towards the defendant to the court.

- where the court acted to further deny any lawful process or procedure by cancelling hearings on outstanding petitions to enforce plaintiff's compliance with prior court orders; and acting with malicious forethought and intent by issuing a deliberately void order which demonstrated an extreme bias and tremendous disdain towards the defendant for persevering, documenting and surviving the unjustified and unexplained annihilation of every aspect of his life - personally professionally and financially.

- where Judge Carolyn Carluccio had deliberately issued a void order with the knowledge that any appeal could be made problematic through misinformation;
with the knowledge that a judge would not strike her void order adversely affecting the integrity of the judiciary;
knowing that irreparable harm and destruction of property would occur while the defendant would be denied any opportunity to address the court or prevent the damage;
knowing that all county personnel would enforce the void order as if it was valid and ignore the lack of jurisdiction to issue the order;
knowing that her prior employment with the United States Attorneys office would undermine and/or prevent any federal investigation into her deliberate corrupt actions;
knowing that as President of the Montgomery County Bar Association the defendant's continued lack of legal representation was assured;

- where with arrogant neglect and deliberate haste the court has failed to adhere to Pennsylvania law and the Divorce Code which causes a procedural defect which denies the court of the lawful authority and jurisdiction to issue the order, the order is void ab initio;
and every subsequent order based on or derived derived from the procedurally defective and void is similarly without lawful authority and jurisdiction, and void ab initio, serving only to demonstrate the deliberate aggressive malice of a biased and corrupt judiciary retaliating against a litigant for surviving injustice and judicial corruption from which there could be no escape while rights and privileges protected by the US CONSTITUTION and the Pennsyolvania Constitution were being collaterally denied and prevented by an aggressively MANDATED confidentiality of information pursuant to an improperly enacted unconstitutional 'law' - Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

WHERE three concurrent appeals now exist in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania - and two of those appeals address actions by the court without jurisdiction while the appeal remained before the Superior Court...

- where the appeal of a procedurally defective and void order which ignored Pennsylvania law and was deliberately and intentionally written with the intent to deny any opportunity for appeal of the order while continuing the injustice and creating a liability for all those who would act without assessing the courts lack of jurisdiction and to perpetuate the injustice and corruption.

The continued threat to the life liberty and freedom of Terance Healy necessitated finding the explanation which could apply to the years of inaction, misinformation and the failure of EVERYONE in law enforcement and every level of government to HELP.



We have asked ourselves whether it is possible that people can get so used to a culture of corruption that corruption loses its meaning.

Rule 1.6 mandated inaction and silence.


What we don’t know, and what we hope to find out today and in future hearings, is what it would have taken to encourage people to act.

Rule 1.6 mandated inaction.


We know people in this community did not consciously choose to stand on the side of injustice at the expense of children. But what was it that made it so hard to do the right thing?

Rule 1.6 mandated inaction and confidentiality of information which is aggressively enforced.


Were people afraid? And, if so, afraid of what? What repercussions? What retributions? Where they intimidated? By whom? And how?

Rule 1.6 mandated inaction and confidentiality of information which is aggressively enforced with sanctions, suspensions and disbarrment...


What protections would they have wanted? Where would they have wanted to take the information they had?

Rule 1.6 mandated confidentiality causes a failure as those to whom information must be provided were additionally mandated to silence.


Did they have confidence that their supervisors, or county officials, or law enforcement, or the Judicial Conduct Board or the attorney Disciplinary Board would have acted professionally?

It could be suggested that following the Rules of Professional Conduct assured that people were acting professionally but mandated by Rule 1.6 to participate in the corruption of the court.


In the end, it is the collective responsibility of all of us to uphold the rule of law that binds us together in a democracy.

Rule 1.6 caused the failure of the rule of law and trumped rights and privileges protected by the US Constitution.



The Interbranch Commission on Juvenile Justice

CONTACT:
Darren Breslin, Esq
Commission Counsel
Special Projects Advisor
1515 Market Street
Suite 1414
Philadelphia, PA 19102
p. 215-560-6300

Support:
Nicholene DiPasquale
Stuart Ditzen
Thomas B. Darr

REPRESENTATION:
Arthur H. Stroyd, Esq.
William S. Stickmanm IV, Esq.

Investigative Services:
William Fisher, Esq


Honorable John M. Cleland, Chair
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Kane, Pa.

Tod C. Allen
former Police Officer
Director of Court Advocacy
Crime Victim Center of Erie County
Erie, Pa.

Valerie Bender
Senior Research Associate
National Center for Juvenile Justice
Pittsburgh, Pa.

Honorable James A. Gibbons
former Assistant United States Attorney
Magisterial District Court
Lackawanna County
Chinchilla, Pa.

Kenneth J. Horoho, Jr., Esq.
a Pittsburgh attorney and former President of the Pennsylvania Bar Association;
member of the HOUSE OF DELEGATES for 20 years;
Adjunct Law Professor;
Goldberg, Gruener, Gentile, Horoho & Avalli, P.C.
Pittsburgh, Pa.

Jason J. Legg, Esq.
District Attorney
Susquehanna County District Attorney's Office
Montrose, Pa.

Robert L. Listenbee, Esq.
Chief, Juvenile Unit
Defender Association of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pa.

George D. Mosee, Jr., Esq.
Deputy District Attorney, Juvenile Division
Philadelphia District Attorney's Office
Philadelphia, Pa.

Honorable John C. Uhler
Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of York County, and former President Judge of the Court;
former Assistant United States Attorney;
former District Attorney of York County
Court of Common Pleas of York County
York, Pa.

Ronald P. Williams
Regional Director, Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture
Lake Winola, Pa.

Honorable Dwayne D. Woodruff
Juvenile court judge from Allegheny County;
Pittsburgh Steelers SuperBowl XIV.
Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County
Pittsburgh, Pa.

Wednesday, June 18, 2014

MEETING: Senator Pat Toomey

Met and exchanged documents and supporting information at Senator Pat Toomey's office in Philadelphia this morning. The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 was presented.

The meeting covered the who, what where, why, how and when in a very short time... with supporting articles and references.

Requested Senator Toomey review and assist in editing of the request for congressional intervention. (Draft Copy)

The meeting ended with us offering to be available to address any questions and provide support and evidence of any issue which is challenged.

Senator Toomey is NOT a lawyer and is NOT MANDATED under Rule 1.6 to ignore injustice and judicial corruption.

JUSTICE IS COMING.





After the meeting at Senator Toomey's office, we walked to Senator Casey's office a few blocks away. Though Sen. Casey's misinformed contact person had refused to arrange any meeting with us, we provided the handouts which were given to Senator Toomey and offered to address any questions or issues which Senator Casey might have on the matter.

We also requested Senator Casey's review and input regarding the the request for congressional intervention document. (Draft Copy)

Senator Casey IS a Lawyer and IS MANDATED under Rule 1.6 to take no action which adversely affects the integrity of the judiciary and the reputation of lawyers... even when those actions deny constitutionally protected rights.

Senator Casey's father was the Governor of Pennsylvania in 1987/1988 when the Rules of Professional Conduct were promulgated and enacted into law by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.