Showing posts with label MANDATED. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MANDATED. Show all posts

Friday, October 3, 2014

No ordinary American cares about their constitutional rights. CORRECT!!!!

10250341_694239333955642_1377715543737369813_nVice President Biden is absolutely CORRECT!!!

The meme/picture gets alot of play on the web with people indicating that the Vice President is wrong, uninformed, and a variety of other aspersions.

Americans have been trained to ignore the TRUTH. In spite of facts and experience, the TRUTH and the messenger are attacked for challenging a belief and trust. The American Government would never let that happen.

BUT, it did.




When you consider that the American Bar Association began implementing their effort in 1984 in New Jersey. Sold as Ethics Policy for Lawyers, every state supreme court enacted the ABA Model Rules between 1984 and 2009. The Model Rules have no basis in ethics or morality.

The ABA knew that their Confidentiality clause would require an attorney to NOT expose a fraud committed by their client EVEN where the attorney was manipulated into being a part of the crime.

Attorney-Client privilege. BULLSHIT! It is a mandate to participate in fraud and further frauds against a victim who is being denied their constitutional protections.

Those who swear to preserve, protect, defend, enforce, support, ... the US Constitution were also mandated to conceal the fraud. It affects every level of state and federal court, every lawyer and federal attorney.

AND THEY DID.

Over 40 million homes foreclosed through fraud.

Over 4000 children and families affect in Cash for Kids.

Uncounted suicides by those victimized by the injustice and prevented any resolution or escape.

Simple execution. Get each court to enact their Professional Code into LAW under their authority to enact law for the business of the courts. Conceal that the Rules cause an unconstitutional denial of protected rights. The choice regarding confidentiality which had been discretionary as LAW is MANDATED.

In 1983, the ABA had removed two provisions from Rule 1.6 Confidentiality which permitted a lawyer to speak where silence would conceal or permit “substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another”;
and
where the lawyer was seeking “to rectify the consequences of a client’s criminal or fraudulent act in the furtherance of which the lawyer’s services have been used.”

Yep, the American Bar Association planned ahead for foreclosure fraud and more... no one went to jail.

BUT, the unconstitutional impact of the law prevents the state supreme court from proper authority to enact the law. BUT, THEY DID ENACT THE LAW IN EVERY STATE.

The CONFIDENTIALITY of Rule 1.6 prevents any lawyers from exposing the situation, and prevents the courts from correcting or resolving the situation. BUT, IT'S NOT A LAW SO THEY DON'T HAVE TO FOLLOW IT.

The level of intimidation and threat which prevents this issue from being addressed must be big. Very big. So much so that no one has fixed it while it has destroyed millions of lives. MILLIONS.

In Pennsylvania, the ability to suspend law is available only to the Legislature. The entire Legislature has been notified. NOTHING. Meetings held with state Senator Chuck McIlhinney. NOTHING. Meetings with State Representative Marguerite Quinn and Kathy Watson.

The level or fear, terror and peril in Kathy Watson's voicemail message when she cancelled subsequent meetings was palpable. She had gone to police. I went to police also. I assured police that I had not made any threat against Rep Watson. Knowing that she was preparing to formally present the matter before the Legislature, it is entirely conceivable that she had been threatened.

This is big. The American Bar Association planned and executed the sedition of the judicial branch, in every state and federally. The ABA had undermined the Rule of Law, the US Constitution, the state constitution.

With the courts authority usurped, the courts were subjected to leverage and manipulation. Courts lost their judicial independence which is a necessity for jurisdiction. That independence is so essential that the judiciary is granted immunity from prosecution for anything as a safeguard of their independence. The courts continued to function without lawful authority.

The affect on the integrity of the courts was visible. The public trust had been violated. YET, STILL NO ONE EXPLAINED, OR CORRECTED, or preserved, protected, defended, supported, or enforced the US Constitution.

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality prevents lawyers and the judiciary from action.

Though an unconstitutional law is a nullity, exposing sedition and treason by the American Bar Association with it's over 400,000 members might be somewhat intimidating.

The lawyers are silent. The politicians are silent. The courts are silent.

Because their unconstitutional law, which denies constitutional rights, has undermined the government and been used to terrorize the American People.

And Americans watched as the rights of their neighbors were denied. They did nothing.
It affected millions. They did nothing.
The fraud upon the court was exposed and publicized. They did nothing.
When Americans need their rights, they are NOT available.

Americans do not care about their Constitutional Rights. Joe Biden is ABSOLUTELY CORRECT, BUT that is about as much as counselor Biden is permitted to reveal without violating Rule 1.6 Confidentiality.

Notice the politicians ignoring the US Constitution. They want Americans to notice. BUT, perhaps they are trying to demonstrate that it is time for American to care.

Remove Unconstitutional Rule 1.6 and the US Constitution is reBooted.

Let's clarify the Veeps message:

No ordinary American cares about their Constitutional Rights, ... I wish they did.

biden_5

Friday, August 29, 2014

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

The following letter was sent to the Justices of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Using the Interbranch Commission on Juvenile Justice Report to demonstrate the failure within the 'system' to take responsibility for the Kids for Cash injustice and the failure to present the cause of the problem - Rule 1.6 Confidentiality.

There have been filings with the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania by which they were aware of our effort though dismissals by unsigned per curiam orders offer plausible deniability to their being informed. As petitions had been filed with the court, it would have been inappropriate to communicate with the judiciary at that time.


One persistent Question lingers...

WHY DID THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA ENACT THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT INTO LAW?



supremecourt

What was the reason which necessitated their action? You may wonder why the supreme court in EVERY state did the same thing at staggered times from 1984 through 2009.

We have asked for a meeting where the issue can be discussed and those essential questions can be answered.




August 28, 2014

Chief Justice Ron Castille
Justice Max Baer
Justice Michael J. Eakin
Justice Seamus P. McCaffrey
Justice Thomas G. Saylor
Justice Correale F. Stevens
Justice Debra Todd
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania


Your Honor,

After meetings with Senator Chuck McIlhinney have failed to demonstrate any progress, it is clearly necessary to raise this issue to your attention directly.

The Interbranch Commission on Juvenile Justice was made up of lawyers (9 of 12) who heard information from county judges, district attorneys, public defenders and the Judicial Conduct Board. Attributing the blame to “silence, inaction, inexperience, ignorance, fear of retaliation, greed, ambition, carelessness.”, the lawyers on the commission maintained ‘confidentiality of information’ as required by law – Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

Their realization was correct – “What good would [reporting] it do?” HOWEVER, the Commission’s report neglected to indicate the reason for the silence (Rule 1.6) and it also neglected to expose the cause (the Rule 1.6 mandate) , and as such their recommended reforms do nothing to prevent a recurrence of the judicial corruption.

Rule 1.6 mandates confidentiality of information where it adversely affects the integrity of the judiciary, the reputation of legal professionals, self-incriminates, or negatively affects their client. Protecting the integrity of a judicial which lacks integrity is foolishness. Mandating it has unconstitutional effects.

The Commission Report and Reform Recommendations amount to fraud – a deliberate effort to conceal the root cause of the failure of the justice system to address judicial misconduct, corruption and injustice.

Far more frightening and perilous, is that the lawyers associated with the Commission have now been ‘educated and trained’ in how to execute and conceal crimes such as those committed by Ciavarella and Conahan – who only went to prison because they had failed at money laundering.

The Supreme Court’s authority to enact law is limited to situations where ‘such rules are consistent with this Constitution [Pennsylvania] and neither abridge, enlarge or modify the substantive rights of any litigant.’

The Attorney General is the chief law enforcement officer in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania who must follow the US Constitution, the Pennsylvania Constitution, and the Rules of Professional Conduct which were enacted by the Supreme Court.

For the Attorney General, the Rule 1.6 mandate of ‘confidentiality of information’ with regard to client information undermines ‘everything’ where an attorney general’s clients include (1) the public, (2) the Pennsylvania government, (3) the Office of the Attorney General, (4) government agencies and departments statewide, (5) personnel within those agencies and departments, (6) and themselves.

The Rules of Professional Conduct enacted by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania have substantially affected the ‘jurisdiction’ of the Attorney General preventing and obstructing law enforcement responsibilities when it relates to judicial corruption and injustice within the courts.

The Supreme Court, by the same mandate, has caused a ‘lawful’ requirement within every court and by every lawyer in the commonwealth to ignore injustice and judicial corruption.

Previous Codes of Professional Responsibility (among other titles) have included similar guidelines, BUT once enacted into ‘law’ in 1987 ignoring injustice and judicial corruption ceased being discretionary and was MANDATED BY LAW.

The result, the Rules of Professional Conduct collaterally affect and negate ‘the substantive rights of the litigant’. Specifically, Rule 1.6 Confidentiality causes a mandatory conspiracy of silence within the courts which ignores the damage and harm caused to litigants and further hinders and prevents any resolution.

The substantive rights of the children and families of Luzerne County were clearly ignored.

The Supreme Court lacked authority to enact Rule 1.6 into law as the substantive rights of the People have been ‘abridged’, ‘modified’, denied and ignored.

Additionally, the role of the Sheriff as Chief Law Enforcement Officer in the county has been negated and minimized by judicial decisions. Constitutionally, the Sheriff has the lawful authority and resources to enforce the law within the county.

Failing to act because the judiciary has convinced them of a greatly diminished role, the non-lawyer Sheriffs (reluctantly) defer authority to the county District Attorney who must follow the Rules of Professional Conduct and Rule 1.6. A necessity to prevent prosecution. District Attorneys take no action to investigate and prosecute the injustice and judicial corruption. Related crimes against the victims of injustice are ignored leaving the litigant with no protection under the law.

The American Bar Association’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct were rolled out to the states and enacted into law nationwide without the involvement of the state legislatures, the signature of the governors or any constitutional review.

“What is right is not always the same as what is legal.” was offered by Edward Snowden as an explanation for his actions revealing unconstitutional activity. This statement may also apply to the failure of attorneys general, judges, district attorneys and lawyers to address the unconstitutional actions made ‘legal’ which have undermined justice over the last 25 years.

It is the responsibility of the Governor to represent the People, to preserve, protect and defend the United States Constitution and the state Constitution, and to recognize that collaterally Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional to the People.

The act of sedition which enacted Rule 1.6 and mandated the silent participation of all legal professionals, perverted the judiciary, sacrificed the personal integrity of every judge, and undermined justice can no longer be ignored and excused because of the intimidation and threats of disciplinary action by the corrupt who have deliberately violated the public trust.

The Commission on Juvenile Justice have not done what was requested of them. They have participated in concealing the truth. They have endorsed and enabled continuing injustice.

You, the members of the Legislature and the Judiciary who assembled the Interbranch Commission on Juvenile Justice must review their report findings and recommendations. The deliberate knowledgeable failure of those lawyers to indicate the root cause of the problem in Luzerne County, which also less publicly affects every court in the Commonwealth, was caused by Rule 1.6 - An unconstitutional and repugnant law which has been improperly enacted by the state Supreme Court without proper review of its affect on constitutional rights.

You attention to this matter of statewide importance is appreciated. A meeting to discuss the issue would be greatly appreciated.

Respectfully,

Terance Healy
Todd M. Krautheim


PDF version
Attachment - Letters sent to other government officials

Saturday, August 2, 2014

Letter to Gov Corbett, PA Senators and Representatives

August 2, 2014

After meetings with Senator Chuck McIlhinney, it is clearly necessary to raise this issue to your attention directly.

The Interbranch Commission on Juvenile Justice was made up of lawyers (9 of 12) who heard information from county judges, district attorneys, public defenders and the Judicial Conduct Board. Attributing the blame to “silence, inaction, inexperience, ignorance, fear of retaliation, greed, ambition, carelessness.”, the lawyers on the commission maintained ‘confidentiality of information’ as required by law – Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

Their realization was correct – “What good would [reporting] it do?” HOWEVER, the Commission’s report neglected to indicate the reason for the silence (Rule 1.6) and it also neglected to expose the cause (the Rule 1.6 mandate) , and as such their recommended reforms do nothing to prevent a recurrence of the judicial corruption.

Rule 1.6 mandates confidentiality of information where it adversely affects the integrity of the judiciary, the reputation of legal professionals, self-incriminates, or negatively affects their client. Protecting the integrity of a judiciary which lacks integrity is foolishness. Mandating it has unconstitutional effects.

The Commission Report and Reform Recommendations amount to fraud – a deliberate effort to conceal the root cause of the failure of the justice system to address judicial misconduct, corruption and injustice.

Far more frightening and perilous, is that the lawyers associated with the Commission have now been ‘educated and trained’ in how to execute and conceal crimes such as those committed by Ciavarella and Conahan – who only went to prison because they had failed at money laundering.

The Supreme Court’s authority to enact law is limited to situations where ‘such rules are consistent with this Constitution [Pennsylvania] and neither abridge, enlarge or modify the substantive rights of any litigant.’

The Attorney General is the chief law enforcement officer in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania who must follow the US Constitution, the Pennsylvania Constitution, and the Rules of Professional Conduct which were enacted by the Supreme Court.

For the Attorney General, the Rule 1.6 mandate of ‘confidentiality of information’ with regard to client information undermines ‘everything’ where an attorney general’s clients include (1) the public, (2) the Pennsylvania government, (3) the Office of the Attorney General, (4) government agencies and departments statewide, (5) personnel within those agencies and departments, (6) and themselves.

The Rules of Professional Conduct enacted by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania have substantially affected the ‘jurisdiction’ of the Attorney General preventing and obstructing law enforcement responsibilities when it relates to judicial corruption and injustice within the courts.

The Supreme Court, by the same mandate, has caused a ‘lawful’ requirement within every court and by every lawyer in the commonwealth to ignore injustice and judicial corruption.

Previous Codes of Professional Responsibility (among other titles) have included similar guidelines, BUT once enacted into ‘law’ in 1987 ignoring injustice and judicial corruption ceased being discretionary and was MANDATED BY LAW.

The result, the Rules of Professional Conduct collaterally affect and negate ‘the substantive rights of the litigant’. Specifically, Rule 1.6 Confidentiality causes a mandatory conspiracy of silence within the courts which ignores the damage and harm caused to litigants and further hinders and prevents any resolution.

The substantive rights of the children and families of Luzerne County were clearly ignored.

The Supreme Court lacked authority to enact Rule 1.6 into law as the substantive rights of the People have been ‘abridged’, ‘modified’, denied and ignored.

Additionally, the role of the Sheriff as Chief Law Enforcement Officer in the county has been negated and minimized by judicial decisions. Constitutionally, the Sheriff has the lawful authority and resources to enforce the law within the county.

Failing to act because the judiciary has convinced them of a greatly diminished role, the non-lawyer Sheriffs (reluctantly) defer authority to the county District Attorney who must follow the Rules of Professional Conduct and Rule 1.6. A necessity to prevent prosecution. District Attorneys take no action to investigate and prosecute the injustice and judicial corruption. Related crimes against the victims of injustice are ignored leaving the litigant with no protection under the law.

The American Bar Association’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct were rolled out to the states and enacted into law nationwide without the involvement of the state legislatures, the signature of the governors or any constitutional review.

“What is right is not always the same as what is legal.” was offered by Edward Snowden as an explanation for his actions revealing unconstitutional activity. This statement may also apply to the failure of attorneys general, judges, district attorneys and lawyers to address the unconstitutional actions made ‘legal’ which have undermined justice over the last 25 years.

It is the responsibility of the Governor to represent the People, to preserve, protect and defend the United States Constitution and the state Constitution, and to recognize that collaterally Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional to the People.

The act of sedition which enacted Rule 1.6 and mandated the silent participation of all legal professionals, perverted the judiciary, sacrificed the personal integrity of every judge, and undermined justice can no longer be ignored and excused because of the intimidation and threats of disciplinary action by the corrupt who have deliberately violated the public trust.

The Commission on Juvenile Justice have not done what was requested of them. They have participated in concealing the truth. They have endorsed and enabled continuing injustice.

You, the members of the Legislature and the Judiciary who assembled the Interbranch Commission on Juvenile Justice must review their report findings and recommendations. The deliberate knowledgeable failure of those lawyers to indicate the root cause of the problem in Luzerne County, which also less publicly affects every court in the Commonwealth, was caused by Rule 1.6 - An unconstitutional and repugnant law which has been improperly enacted by the state Supreme Court without proper review of its affect on constitutional rights.

You attention to this matter of statewide importance is appreciated.

Respectfully,

Terance Healy
Todd M. Krautheim

Wednesday, June 18, 2014

MEETING: Senator Pat Toomey

Met and exchanged documents and supporting information at Senator Pat Toomey's office in Philadelphia this morning. The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 was presented.

The meeting covered the who, what where, why, how and when in a very short time... with supporting articles and references.

Requested Senator Toomey review and assist in editing of the request for congressional intervention. (Draft Copy)

The meeting ended with us offering to be available to address any questions and provide support and evidence of any issue which is challenged.

Senator Toomey is NOT a lawyer and is NOT MANDATED under Rule 1.6 to ignore injustice and judicial corruption.

JUSTICE IS COMING.





After the meeting at Senator Toomey's office, we walked to Senator Casey's office a few blocks away. Though Sen. Casey's misinformed contact person had refused to arrange any meeting with us, we provided the handouts which were given to Senator Toomey and offered to address any questions or issues which Senator Casey might have on the matter.

We also requested Senator Casey's review and input regarding the the request for congressional intervention document. (Draft Copy)

Senator Casey IS a Lawyer and IS MANDATED under Rule 1.6 to take no action which adversely affects the integrity of the judiciary and the reputation of lawyers... even when those actions deny constitutionally protected rights.

Senator Casey's father was the Governor of Pennsylvania in 1987/1988 when the Rules of Professional Conduct were promulgated and enacted into law by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

Monday, March 31, 2014

State Judiciary and Judicial Process - MANDATORY CORRUPTION BY LAW

5526_10152122462594398_1301841340_n

The courts crippled themselves. They MANDATED their own corruption by law.

They MANDATED silence and CONFIDENTIALITY of Information.

Every level of state courts participated.

The Courts mandated the participation of every lawyer in their conspiracy to deny and obstruct justice and constitutional rights.

Rule 1.6 - Confidentiality of Information is UNCONSTITUTIONAL... and once removed JUSTICE WILL BE RESTORED.

And then, the Constitution in every state must remove the self-policing power from the judiciary who has betrayed the trust of the people.

Friday, October 11, 2013

Resurrect the Constitution. Rule 1.6 causes injustice and defies the Constitution. NO MORE!

The victims experienced the loss of the Constitution first. But no one would listen. Everyone who hears the wide spread stories of the death of the Constitution know the feeling, but are unsure of how it could have happened.

How can so many people ignore the loss of constitutionally protected rights and liberties. How can the government lawfully fail to investigate. How does this deliberate and intentional neglect to recognize the loss of rights HAPPEN IN AMERICA?

It was necessary to find the answer, the cause, the reason. Everyone felt their neglectful actions were lawful. There was that, and ONE OTHE THING which they ALL had in common.

RULE 1.6. Caused it... and kept it secret. MANDATED THE SECRECY. PREVENTING ANY RESOLUTION.

RULE 1.6 Confidentiality of Information punished any who dared make any attempt to expose the sedition caused by this law. This law illegally enacted by the judiciary which prevented prosecution of judicial misconduct - judicial crime - judicial retaliation.

The author of the RULE, the American Bar Association, became the largest and most corrupt racketeering organization in the history of the United States. And their lawyers are preventing the media from carrying this story.
FEMA_-_5628_-_Photograph_by_Bri_Rodriguez_taken_on_09-27-2001_in_New_York-1

They took our homes. They took our children. They took our families. They took our friends. They took our liberty.

... with Liberty and Justice for all. JUSTICE IS COMING!

Notify your representatives, your senators, your governor, your federal officials... tell them about the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the Rules Of Professional Conduct. (YES, THE SAME EXACT NAME IN EVERY STATE. REALLY.) Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional, destructive, and unjust. Americans demand the restoration of your civil rights and liberties!

JUSTICE IS COMING! PROCLAIM LIBERTY AND JUSTICE THROUGHOUT THE LAND! JUSTICE IS COMING!

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Jurisdiction - The lie which conceals injustice.

The LIE of not having jurisdiction is intended to make people go away. Judges act without jurisdiction. ALOT. When they do, there is no way to address their lack of jurisdiction, because Rule 1.6 prevents exposure of the 'misconduct' of the judge, or the lawyer who perverted the legal proceedings. Eighteen judges of the Montgomery County Judiciary sacrificed their integrity for the fraud committed by one of their own. Their abuse of power under color of law is astounding and can only be described as terror.

Rule 1.6 prevents anyone from helping... BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT PERMITTED TO EXPOSE THE 'MISCONDUCTS'.

They then tell you they do not have jurisdiction. THIS IS A LIE. They are not allowed to tell you there has been a misconduct which prevents justice in your matter. So, they pretend you are completely ignorant about jurisdiction.

JurisdictionThe lack of jurisdiction is a LIE.

The Attorney General in each state is the highest law enforcement officer in the state. They have jurisdiction to combat crimes, corruption, and every level of wrongdoing and injustice.

BUT, as lawyers the Attorneys General are MANDATED to ignore anything which exposes misconduct of lawyers and the judiciary.

RULE 1.6 trumps jurisdiction.
RULE 1.6 trumps all other law.
RULE 1.6 trumps justice.
RULE 1.6 trumps ethics and morality.
RULE 1.6 ignores the Constitution of the United States.
RULE 1.6 targets its victims with complete loss of protection of the law, absolute injustice, denial of any course of action to escape, and prevents anyone from doing anything to help. The victims of injustice have all been denied the true explanation for why they became disenfranchised.

Attorney General Tom Corbett had jurisdiction.
Attorney General Linda Kelly had jurisdiction.
Attorney General Kathleen Kane has jurisdiction to prosecute corrupt judges, but she lacks the lawful ability to act. Rule 1.6 made it impossible for them to fully accomplish their responsibilities as Attorney General.

Think of any scandal where a judge was prosecuted. Ask yourself who prosecuted the matter? Federal prosecutors. The State did not act. Now consider that the State Attorneys General have been compelled by Rule 1.6 to ignore the crimes of the judiciary and the membership of the bar.

What Attorneys General do not have is the legal ability to address corruption in the legal system, or make any change which would provide that lawful ability.

It might seem they are too ashamed to tell you, EXCEPT THAT THEY CANNOT LAWFULLY TELL YOU because RULE 1.6 prevents them from telling you the truth.

That Rule 1.6 results in the complete loss of constitutional rights to the victims of unaddressable misconduct. It further prevents any lawyer or judge taking any action to correct the MASSIVE FAILURE in this law.

The only way to make the change is for someone with no legal background to come along, to have been terrorized for years by injustice, to find and recognize the failure in the LAW, and to address the law in the only way possible and lawful.

Fix it yourself... so that's what was done.

It is necessary that he learn, study, review research and then serve the resolution back to those who were made lawfully incapable of taking any action to help him.

The only way out is through a victim. I am that victim. I have survived their terror. Through it all, i was able to persevere. And I have served the resolution which permits the return to justice to the Attorneys General of the entire United States.

I have filed in Federal Court a Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Civil Action 13-4614.

JUSTICE IS COMING.


So when Robert Mulle, Chief Deputy Attorney General - Legal Review Section writes on August 20, 2013 that
"Mr. Healy has contacted this office in the past and has explained his situation. Mr Healy has been advised on many occasions that this office does not have jurisdiction to intervene on his behalf and that is still the position of this office."

ROBERT MULLE IS TELLING A LIE.

The Office does have jurisdiction. He is just not lawfully permitted to tell the truth, or to take any action. Robert Mulle is shamed and humiliated into a lie in order to continue unconstitutional injustice and terror of a victim who begged for help.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 will return integrity to the judicial system and to the Attorney Generals as well. Robert Mulle can live with his past lies and shame.

Injustice Mandated by Law

I have a dream... to escape the nightmare of injustice MANDATED by Rule 1.6

"The strictest law sometimes becomes the severest injustice." Benjamin Franklin

"Injustice is censured because the censures are afraid of suffering, and not from any fear which they have of doing injustice." Plato

1184874_10151537473290667_1454462699_n

"True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else." Clarence Darrow