If you don't believe that Rule 1.6 happened... Look to Oklahoma

The word out of Oklahoma this week is the introduction of a Bill in their Legislature to prevent prosecution for abuse of power by limiting the ability to prosecute exclusively to the state Attorney General.. to the exclusion of the District Attorneys.

With the current effort to remove an unconstitutional law which has been concealed under the disinformation that it is 'attorney-client privilege" and where it results in devastating and inescapable loss of constitutional rights of the victim FOREVER... and where Rule 1.6 clearly demonstrates the unconstitutional ability and the defiance to being addressed - because lawyers may not reveal the TRUTH.

OKLAHOMA - Are y'all out of your ever-lovin minds?

The ABA presented Rule 1.6 a law which undermined the authority of every state judiciary and held the judiciary hostage shown by their loss of judicial independence. The ABA knew that their ethics code lacked ethics, morality and lawfulness. Against the advice of Robert Kutek who wrote the 'Rules', the ABA deliberately removed 2 fraud provisions from the law which could have prevented 30 years of injustice and unconstitutionality. Kids for Cash in Luzerne County Pennsylvania. Over 48 million forcerclosures using fraudulent anf forged robosigned documents. INJUSTICE throughout the entire US. An overwhelming realization that the Constiotution was being ignored by those who had sworn to preserve protect and defend it.

OKLAHOMA - Are y'all out of your ever-lovin minds?

Oklahoma lawmaker wants to bar DAs from charging state officials

District attorneys across Oklahoma are upset with proposed legislation that would bar them from prosecuting any state official for a public offense.

Only the attorney general could file those criminal cases, if House Bill 2206 becomes law.

“It’s a big deal to me. I’m upset and concerned,” Oklahoma County District Attorney David Prater said. “This bill creates a different class of citizens that would be protected from the normal prosecution process.”

He questioned if the bill is retaliation for his prosecutions of legislators, a judge and members of the Pardon and Parole Board.

“I am suspicious ... that is what this is really about,” Prater said.
Link to full story.

---

Elected and Above the Law: Bill “Would Exempt Lawmakers from Prosecution of Nearly Any Crimes”

This one is just too rich. The arrogance and absurdity is over the top.

Granted, most of the political class is already de facto above the law to begin with.

But now, a lawmaker in Oklahoma has introduced a bill to officially give most lawmakers, judges, appointees and holders of high office immunity from prosecution.

Link to Full Story

---

Unconstitutional Nullity: Peek-a-boo... Justice is Coming

Freedom is IMPORTANT. Constitutional rights are IMPORTANT.

If your solution violates either My Freedom or the US Constitution, then YOU have some more work to do.

Freedoms and Rights can coexist.

Once permitted to infringe upon each other, it is a slippery slope.
(OY! I hate cliche's but no better choice there.)

I am grateful for the effort by the founders of the US, because in today's 140 char or less environment they would never have been allowed to think in a broad sense which permits freedom and rights to co-exist.

Their archived papers and documents explained the basis for their decisions, and the aspects which they wrestled with to come to the decision. They exerted considerably more thought while founding the American Government than people expect. It was not haphazard. Decisions were not reached by exhausting the person who did not agree. Only one known and argued issue seems to have been conceded while it left the government at risk.

One issue which was a necessity left a loophole in the separation of powers. They did foresee the problem, but did not imagine that it would ever occur. They got it wrong. Very wrong.

By permitting the Judicial branch to self-police, the administration of justice, and the independence of the judiciary and the reasons which necessitated absolute judicial immunity all pivoted on one point of failure - THE PUBLIC TRUST.

The Public Trust in the judiciary is mandated by law. Respect towards the judicial branch is mandated by law.

The courts were open rooms in the centers of towns. Justice was transparent and open to the public. The public could witness proceedings. When necessary, where the trust placed in the judiciary was violated, the public would remove a judge from office. Occasionally by hanging. Justice was swift. Violations of the Public Trust could not be permitted to continue and erode the entire system of justice and government..

It was this type of violation of the public trust which endorsed and enabled apartheid to persist in South Africa. Their judiciary jailed the outspoken without regard for their own injustice.

When South Africa wrote their new Constitution in the 90's, they made certain that the judicial branch was accountable to the people and the Executive and Legislative branches of government, and not just to the judicial branch. They recognized the problem which existed in the US, once corrupted the judiciary find justice in permitting injustice to continue.


THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT
(because trust, honor and respect is mandated by law)

The judiciary did not recognize Rule 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION for the pervasive corruption it would permit, cause, enable and conceal.

Once under the control of Rule 1.6, with the leverage of exposing the violation of the public trust concealed by the judiciary, the American Bar Association had effectively usurped the authority and independence of the judiciary. The ABA then manipulated the authority of the courts over lawyers and legal professionals, even in other branches of government. Where Rule 1.6 expanded to affect federal lawyers, Rule 1.6 undermined the jurisdiction and authority of the Federal Government to act to address corruption within the state. Rule 1.6 required active participation in the conspiracy and the injustice.

The McDade Murtha Amendment which prevents the exposure of Rule 1.6 by government lawyers was enacted against the objections of several US Attorneys General, and DOJ officials. It would have been so simple had they only informed the Congress of the central issue. Applying the ethical standard enacted within the state to all government lawyers would cause considerable damage to the government.

The Rules of Professional Conduct lacked ethics, permitted fraud and the efforts to conceal fraud and prevent resolution. The US Congress never checked to see if the state ethics laws were ethical. Pennsylvania describes the Rules as a minimal ethical standard. Minimal is none. Points for not lying about the law which would require their silence about the corruption it would cause.

Did the state law, Rule 1.6 prevent exposing that state ethics laws lacked ethics? even where the country was about to mandate all government attorneys to follow the 'Rules' within the respective state where they were investigating and working? even where it denied constitutionally protected rights?

Apparently, the lawyers who foreclosed upon over 48 million homes using fraudulent and forged robo-signed documents were confident that their corruption of the authority of the judiciary had been successful.

The big injustices, the little injustices all combine to create a sense of national urgency. Injustice is occurring across the country. The US Constitution is being ignored. One law enacted in every state affects every case secretly, confidentially. Promotion to law was begun in 1984, generations of lawyers find this 'acceptable' because they were mandated to conceal the problem if they discovered it. Trained to perceive Rule 1.6 as attorney-client privilege, and neglecting the affect on the law, justice and the judiciary.... even while it undermined and usurped the authority of the other branches of government.

When recognized by PA Attorney General Kathleen Kane, an unconstitutional law would not be effective to silence her, The courts issues several secret court orders. AG Kane is silenced while those corrupt orders are under appeal.... and while it undermines the constitutional rights of every American.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 removes an unconstitutional law and restores justice to the entire country. Discovered by victims of injustice with standing to address the unconstitutional effect of the 'law'. Without the assistance, or cooperation, of any legal professional or member of the American Bar Association and affiliated organizations formed in every jurisdiction at every level of state and federal courts.

Hindered from the effort by legal professionals within the state and federal government mandated to follow the unconstitutional law, the government lawyers knew better and cannot be excused from damages and repartations for their participation in the denial of the rule of law and prevention of rights secures by the US Constitution.

Did those secret court orders require Kathleen Kane to file for divorce in an attempt to secure her personal assets? Is that why those lawyers are representing 'the person' Kathleen Kane (and not the Office of the Attorneyh General)?

The laws work when not prevented by an unconstitutional requirement to conceal injustice in every state and federally.

If your solution violates either My Freedom or the US Constitution, then you have some more work to do.

If their defense is that they were following the law, then they need to recall that an unconstitutional law is no law, a nullity, as if it never existed. It can no longer be obstructed by an unconstitutional law mandating non-disclosure and confidentiality and participation in a conspiracy to deny constitutional rights.


A nullity cannot conceal a nullity.

A nullity cannot justify or excuse a nullity.

PEEK-a-Boo... JUSTICE IS COMING.

Peek-a-boo Pennsylvania!

Governor Wolf and the Legislature can act now, or after a federal lawsuit is filed against them?

Those who know better ought to know better than to continue their participation in a conspiracy to deny the constitutional rights of every American in every state. EVERY PERSON MATTERS.

Pwennsylvania, whatcha gonna do?

The Terror of a Constant Threat

The recipient of Rule 1.6 injustice has no protection of the law. Their constitutional rights are ignored by the courts and law enforcement. All legal professionals are prevented from helping or doing anything to resolve ANY situation. Triggered by an act of judicial misconduct, Rule 1.6 secretly and silently undermines a litigant while attempting to conceal the injustice of a judge and protect the integrity of the judiciary.

There is no opportunity to succeed in a court. Without the rule of law and while constitutional rights are being ignored, survival is the best possible outcome - - BUT the victim does not know that and arrives in court... Prepared. Researched. Documented. Properly executed. Procedures followed. Yet, the victim leaves court battered and further threatened and terrified by the experience of the inexplicable actions of a corrupted court. The court provides no explanations for their injustice. Rule 1.6 Confidentiality applies.

The ONLY person in the courtroom who believes in 'the justice system' is the unwitting target who trusts it. Everyone else knows that there will be no justice. The lawyers, the judges, the court staff, the deputies observe the corruption and injustice. They witness justice. Intimidated by corruption, THEY RECOGNIZE WHEN A PROCEEDING IS A FARCE.

A FARCE. Every proceeding. For years.

In hindsight, it is clear and undeniable. Procedures are not followed. Protocol is abandoned. The law is ignored. Rights protected by the US Constitution are unavailable. Court Orders are not enforced. Only their victim is swiftly held to a stringent adherence to every procedure, protocol, law, and order. The victim must respond to and address and disprove each and every false allegation against them to survive it.

Robert Angst and Valerie Angst, the lawyers with education and a staff are excused from every failure. Their failures are deliberate. They serve to create an undercurrent of deliberate chaos. An ever increasing volume of issues to be presented. A cacophony of injustice which will 'annoy the living shit' out of the judge who knows that the entire thing is a complete farce. Angst & Angst made certain that they were protected from any backlash by a judge who ignored their every failure.

In the end, it is the document filed by Robert Angst to prevent any divorce decree from being issued 'pre-maturely' which exacerbates the procedural defect and a law deliberately constructed and enacted to assure litigants had the opportunity to be heard. Where neither party requested the entry of the divorce decree the court lacks authority and jurisdiction to enter an order. Robert Angst had filed a document indicating that a divorce decree should NOT be entered. Where neither party requested the entry of the Divorce Decree, and the Plaintiff through her lawyers indicated they did NOT want the entry of a divorce decree, Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio acted in the clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction.

The calculated actions of Angst & Angst neglected due process, procedure and law with intent. Those actions would appear to create a form of leverage whereby the judge might be lenient on their next failure. While every proceeding was pre-determined to deny any success to the hopeful victim, they were daring the judge to follow procedure and law. Sociopaths throwing the judge under the bus. By creating a 'clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction' for the judiciary, Angst & Angst were able to leverage judicial immunity for further injustice.

Absolute Judicial Immunity is provided to the judiciary even where the judicial actions of the judge…
… exceed their jurisdiction,
… are done maliciously or corruptly, or
… are flawed by grave procedural error.

THERE IS A SINGLE EXCEPTION. In order to lose immunity, there must be a clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction.

Where any judge strikes the defective and void order, they would be expose the liability of their benchmates. Angst & Angst again leverage the corruption of the judiciary and attempt to enforce a defective and void order. The Court complies with their extortion by COMPLETELY IGNORING THAT THE ORDER IS VOID AND COMPLETELY NEGLECTING THE CHALLENGE TO JURISDICTION. The terror of an 'unappealable order' which defies the attention of the court and threatens the life and liberty of the victim.

Why would there be twenty (20) judges involved in the matter of Healy v Healy? Imagine the shame and self-loathing which would occur when you are participating in a deliberate injustice, violating the trust of a litigant, a rouse to harass and terrify. Angst & Angst were doing everything possible to ensure that the judge excused and ignored enough of their wrong-doing to be identified as an active and involved participant. Those actions were being subsequently documented on the court record and were building a considerable volume of evidence.

Evidence of the procedural failures and the breach of protocol and violation of law are being presented in proceedings to enforce compliance with court orders - yet, the judge dismisses every matter without explanation. The judge can't tell the litigant that THE ENTIRE THING IS JUST A SHAM TO TERRORIZE A MAN. The judge is disgusted and just wants out. The judge's integrity is being sacrificed while Rule 1.6 prevents explanation or resolution or escape.

Where every judicial proceeding and action has been a complete sham. A performance whereby the victim is attacked again and again... because the victim survives, there will be further actions. NO ONE WILL STOP THEIR DESTRUCTIVE FARCE... Rule 1.6 allows fraud in the furtherance of fraud. Rule 1.6 does not permit disclosure to rectify the fraud. Rule 1.6 prevents every legal professional from helping.

Their 'FARCE' has denied life and liberty. Destroyed Financially. Isolated and divided family. Prevented custody and visitation. Left you unemployed, homeless and threatened with jail. Attached supporters bank accounts. Infiltrated all technology - your friends tech also. False friendships by Investigators and Informants. Required additional litigation, additional parties. Undermined an entire judiciary. Nine (9) years of my life. Prevented and denied any future relief or escape. THIS IS A DIVORCE. This is not a criminal case.

Only in the family courts can someone who has committed no crime lose everything.

WTF? I asked that in a letter to the Montgomery County Judiciary two months before I realized Rule 1.6 was the problem. There was no response.

The available resources, actions and efforts to terrorize their victim to being 1) homeless/destitute 2) incarcerated or 3) suicide are not as arbitrary as you might think. A review of documents which relate to good mental health practices when going through a stressful period demonstrates a disturbing strategy. Their litigation has been designed to undermine the target psychologically by removing or obstructing support and coping methods while isolating the victim. They are undermining emotional and mental health by directly inhibiting efforts which provide resilience.

Acting above the law without any sense of moral responsibility or social conscience they wrote a law which permitted every act against the target and prevented any escape. As long as the target is not going to be murdered, Rule 1.6 confidentiality mandates non-disclosure. Driving a target to suicide is an acceptable 'loophole'. Only a sociopath would design a system by which criminals were not permitted to kill, but permitted to bring about a suicide. Kutek would be horrified.

Lawyers rejected the 'fraud provisions' of Rule 1.6 against the prolonged debate and strong lobbying efforts of Robert Kutek while writing the code of ethical conduct for lawyers. Weeks after Kutek's sudden death in 1983, the fraud provisions were removed from Rule 1.6 and promoted by the American Bar Association to each state as an ethical standard while it's lack of ethics was inconsequential. In a clear contradiction to his legacy, the ABA refers to the committee responsible for the Rules of Professional Conduct as The Kutek Commission.

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality undermines the judiciary and every proceeding. The injustice grows while Rule 1.6 prevents resolution or escape from further actions. I would hope that my case is an extreme. My case demonstrates the broad affect of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality which prevents any remedy. It is the volume of information and experiences which lead to the discovery of the needle in the haystack of injustice. Where no explanation was offered... and no question answered... EVER. Rule 1.6 could be applied to 'justify' the silence.

Rule 1.6 non-disclosure is permitted to conceal Rule 1.6 non-disclosure. They won't say anything and won't tell you why... Rule 1.6 is permitted to be invoked without invoking it. Rule 1.6 makes it possible to break the law, commit acts in the furtherance of that fraud, undermine the integrity and independence of the judiciary, prevent exposure through further fraud AND NOT EVER INDICATE THAT RULE 1.6 is involved. Ex parte communications, letters and meetings which arrange the injustice and corruption are also Rule 1.6 Confidential.

Prevented from information and denied rights and the protection of the law, my experience may be extreme but it is not isolated or unique... Rule 1.6 is law in every state. A violation of the public trust by the Judicial branch. The judiciary are accorded respect and honor BY LAW because it is necessary for the People to trust in JUSTICE.

The American Bar Association's Rule 1.6 has leveraged the public trust to undermine the judiciary. The only folks who profit from injustice are the members of the ABA and its affiliated organizations.

THE SCANDAL OF RULE 1.6 IS BIG. VERY BIG. HUGE.

JUSTICE IS COMING.

Overthrow in Pennsylvania - Judicial overthrows Executive and Legislative!

The Judicial Branch has ordered the Executive Branch to cease any investigation or prosecution... to conceal the corruption and usurpation of the Judicial Branch.

ATTORNEY GENERAL KATHLEEN KANE's COURT ORDERED SECRECY

The Judicial Branch can't order the Executive Branch not to enforce the laws of the Legislative Branch. Doing so by threatening disciplinary action demonstrates a broad overreach of the Judicial branch and a violation of the Separation of Powers. What would make them attempt this type of improper unconstitutional action?

If Judicial wished to excuse the crime after a hearing, they would act at that time in their forum - a PUBLIC forum.

To prevent public exposure of their corruption a hearing must be averted. But, any effort to prevent investigation would be visible.

There is no method by which the judiciary can prevent the other two branches from their responsibilities.

The judicial effort to prevent exposure has been publicly exposed and concealed by secrecy...

PUBLICLY AND SECRETLY, the judicial branch has ordered the Attorney General to inaction using two secret orders from two secret courts.

PUBLICLY AND SECRETLY, there are several Grand Jury's at work. One is investigating the Attorney General, but the grand jury is a tool of the Executive branch. Why has the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania called for a Grand Jury lead by Thomas Carluccio?

A grand jury seeking to suppress evidence of the unconstitutional actions of the judiciary is investigating the Attorney General. Chief Justice Ron Castille called for this Montgomery County Grand Jury. It is being run by Thomas Carluccio, whose wife Judge Caryolyn Tornetta Carluccio has issued defective and void orders without proper subject matter jurisdiction. Those corrupt orders are at the center of Healy v Healy and Healy v Miller and will eventually be the subject of federal litigation against the entire county, and the 20 judges from the Montgomery County Bench - all have lost any immunity because of the actions of Carluccio. Their actions demonstrated the unconstitutional influence of Rule 1.6 on the courts and law enforcement. THOMAS CARLUCCIO IS THE ONLY ATTORNEY IN THE COUNTY WHO COULD NOT BE COMPELLED TO GIVE TESTIMONY AGAINST HIS WIFE. Who better to learn and suppress the evidence in a case against the county judiciary.

For the Judicial branch to act before a hearing demonstrates an improper influence and control over the other two branches of government dismissing the lawmaker and the law enforcer. An egregious and obvious breach of the separation of powers established in the Constitution.

Where the Executive and Legislative have been participating by concealing the improper usurpation and undermining of the Judicial branch held hostage by the American Bar Association, their silence and inaction has given way to a demonstration of the absolute overthrow of the state government.

The American Bar Association controlled Judiciary has clearly overthrown the entire state government and wielded an improper unlawful and unconstitutional authority which demands the immediate attention of the People and their elected representatives.

Note to US DOJ: This situation exists in every state rolled out by the ABA from 1984 through 2009.

Rule 1.6 is their power and their downfall

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information has concealed their conspiracy and corruption, but once exposed as an unconstitutional law, the Judicial Branch was without explanation. Once challenged with clear evidence of the violation of constitutionally protected rights, the Judiciary was prompted to actions which exposed their overreach of authority.

THE KEY is Rule 1.6 - an unconstitutional law enacted by the Judiciary. Where the Executive would investigate and discover and prove the unconstitutional law, it would demonstrate the actions of the judiciary to conceal that their authority had been usurped and undermined by the American Bar Association by and through their enacting Rule 1.6 into law.

Ordering the Executive Branch to avoid investigation of the issue, shows an overreach of Judicial authority.

The Judiciary calling a Grand Jury to silence the Attorney General shows an overreach of Judicial authority.

The Judicial Branch has demonstrated their overreach and violation of the state constitution.

The Legislature was already removed from authority where the state judiciary improperly enacted a law which affected substantive rights and denied constitutional protections. A clear violation of the state constitution Article V Section 10(c).

The Pennsylvania Legislature has been asked to suspend Rule 1.6 as they have the authority to suspend any law. The Judiciary Committees have neglected to present the issue to the entire Legislature.

Rule 1.6 was the necessity which enabled the misuse of judicial authority. Once exposed as an unconstitutional nullity, the evidence of the corruption and perversion of justice would no longer be concealed.

As Rule 1.6 had become the "worst kept secret in Pennsylvania", the Judicial Branch acted in the open to suppress the matter exposing their usurpation of the Executive and Legislative branches.

THAT EXPLAINS EVERYTHING.

To the People:

Intervention is necessary.

Remove the American Bar Association. The ABA has done this in every state and federally. Rule 1.6 unconstitutional injustice exists in every state.

Shut Down the American Bar Association and all affiliates at every level of county, state and federal court.

Their RULE 1.6 enabled caused and perpetuated the injustice within the state government of every state and federally. Their Rule 1.6 permitted them to unconstitutionally and unlawfully intercept and interfere with the administration of justice in every court.

In Pennsylvania, the District Attorneys have been tightly organized minions of corruption and injustice. Resignations are appropriate.

At the state level, the judicial branch must promptly be restricted as demonstrated by the Constitution adopted by South Africa after the years of Apartheid where the courts silenced and retaliated against anyone who disagreed or spoke out or attempted to assert their rights: constitutional, civil, human or otherwise.

JUSTICE IS COMING...

I agree with Attorney General Kathleen Kane. She is central to resolution of this issue. She has witnessed the corruption, how deep it goes and how powerful it is. She has reason to be confident of re-election.

Kathleen Kane will restore JUSTICE to the entire state and start a wave of JUSTICE across the entire country.

Rule 1.6 is concealing the injustice of judges and lawyers

Rule 1.6 - Confidentiality of Information - The judges made it LAW. The judiciary lost independence and have been held hostage by the lawyers who profit from every action. There is an ABA affiliated organization at every level of the courts to ensure the judiciary held hostage does not break free. The lawyers blame the judges, yet lawyers control the paperwork, schedule, newsmedia... and the lawyers get PAID.

The corrupt lawyers control the grand juries, and every aspect of law enforcement. The sheriffs and others not under Rule 1.6 are convinced of diminished authority.

It's not about hating lawyers... It is about their profiting from INJUSTICE... and the terror they inflict in the process. If the legal professional is NOT getting paid, they are not interested.

Attack a cop - Lawyers get paid

Threaten a judge - Lawyers get paid

File in court - Lawyers get paid

Bad law - Lawyers get paid

Grand Jury Corruption - Lawyers get paid

Murder a cop - Lawyers on TV get paid

Crime - Lawyers get paid

Murder/Suicide - DENIED THEM PROFITS
- where the lawyers efforts pushed someone to the brink, they will slander every aspect of the person who denied them PROFIT$

Murder your family - THEY DON'T CARE
(Plenty more available)

Suicide - THEY DON'T CARE
(Family Court has more)

The American Bar Association created Rule 1.6 injustice and had it enacted into LAW in every state.

Unconstitutional law denying people's rights, freedoms, and preventing any relief or escape.

Where justice doesn't generate any revenue for the legal profession...

INJUSTICE IS A GOLD MINE!

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality permits every effort to expose it to be undermined by fraud - which is concealed. Even the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 was undermined by fraud in the federal district court in Philadelphia and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

When Rule 1.6 unconstitutionality was proven to Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane, she was prevented from action by secret orders from secret courts. The 'worst kept secret in Pennsylvania' is just a part of A Terroristic Divorce. Rule 1.6 INJUSTICE.

“But I will tell you this. Even I am shocked at the level of public corruption.”
I am shocked at how deep it goes.
I am shocked at how powerful it is.
I have never seen anything like this. It’s breathtaking.
It has been described by the people familiar with what is happening as shameful.”

“But, if this can be done to me as Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer of the 5th largest state in the country, i am sickened to think what can and may be done to regular, good people who don;t have the resources that I have to challenge it.”

- Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane on two court ordered mandates from unidentified judges and unidentified courts.

The Superior Court Farce - Unconstitutional. Unprosecuted. Injustice Ignored.

Imagine three appeals to the Superior Court. Each attempting to address the same single basic point.

A judge has acted without jurisdiction. It was deliberate - she wanted your suicide and you have repeatedly failed to deliver. Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio knew EXACTLY what she was doing. She ignored EVERY procedure. She ignored every law. I notified. She failed to correct. She retaliated.

Where subject matter jurisdiction is the single element required for absolute immunity, one of the twenty judges to hear the case, Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio exposed the entire Montgomery County Bench to liability. All circuits interpret Stump and Bradley to require a clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction in order to lose immunity. The neglect and failure to correct demonstrates deliberate informed actions with clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction.

Carluccio called it her "Unappealable Order" because any judge who addresses it would bring down an entire bench. As there can be no retroactive correction for lack of jurisdiction, the order is designed to destroy a litigant. There can NEVER be relief where this order which defies being addressed can be used to undermine any and every court. CIA torture tactics ended, Carluccio's judicial tactic was 'to the death'.

I AM NOT BRADLEY STONE. You will not provoke me to the point of self-destruction. AND GOD KNOWS THE JUDICIARY HAS TRIED SINCE 2007 TO MAKE THAT HAPPEN. (** See Footnote **)

I have faced their unending EVIL and CRUELTY and have defiantly not ended up dead in a ditch.

I have lost EVERYTHING and not been gunned down in a hail of bullets.

I have brought the issue of their lawlessness to EVERY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY and have been ignored without explanation.

Currently, the Superior Court Farce is documented with 5 different departments. They have the evidence which demonstrates that the Central Legal Staff intercepted and intervened - providing unsigned unsubstantiated orders which ignored any issue and dismissed every issue. The has been no review of any motion or brief by the judiciary of the Superior Court. No proceeding. Everything done on paper without signatures. Everything violated the Judicial Canons.

The Superior Court has been 'involved' for years... but done nothing. I am homeless, destitute, unemployed, under constant litigation requirements and deadlines... Because I have not crumbled, they have continued to delay to the point where three concurrent appeals were occurring with constant paperwork demands.

AND THEN IT WAS CLEAR... there is no judge behind these actions. They are fake. Forgery. Different paperwork. Different captions. Different letterhead. There is no applicable law. Everything which has occurred within the Superior Court has been a complete farce. Discourtesy and disrespect - all attempts to provoke an outburst. Raising all of their farce to their attention. Of course, they ignored their own farce.

Hiding behind the corrupt actions of the Central Legal Staff. BUT, their actions CLEARY violate Pennsylvania law. Their actions are unconstitutional - inter alia interfering with the administration of the courts. Where they might hide behind Rule 1.6 confidentiality, they prove the Rule is unconstitutional - a nullity - no law - and the PA Supreme Court has no authority to enaxct a law which affects substantive rights.

While I have been struggling alone to survive, EVERYTHING THE SUPERIOR COURT HAS DONE HAS BEEN FAKE. INCOMPREHENSIBLE. UNDENIABLE. CRIMINAL.

... and UNCONSTITUTIONAL

US Attorney Zane Memeger has had the information about the CENTRAL LEGAL STAFF crimes for over a month... (October 30, 2014)

Attorney General Kathleen Kane has had the information about the CENTRAL LEGAL STAFF crimes for over a month... (November 15, 2014)

Philadelphia District Attorney Seth Williams has had the information about the CENTRAL LEGAL STAFF crimes for over a month... (November 15, 2014)

Bucks District Attorney David Heckler has had the information about the CENTRAL LEGAL STAFF crimes for over a month... (November 15, 2014)

Montgomery District Attorney Risa Ferman - LOL! There is no point when she has cancelled EVERY investigation by Montgomery County Detectives for the last 9 years.

The US Postal Inspection Service has had the information about the CENTRAL LEGAL STAFF crimes for over a month... Mail Fraud. (Inspectors are non-lawyers, not corrupted by Rule 1.6, who have not been undermined like the County Sheriffs.)

I AM NOT BRADLEY STONE. I WILL NOT PERMIT DISTRICT ATTORNEY RISA FERMAN TO APPEAR ON TELEVISION AND IN EVERY NEWSPAPER SELF-RIGHTEOUSLY TALKING ABOUT A MAN WHO WAS PUSHED TO THE BRINK BY THE CORRUPTION OF THE COURTS AND THE FAILURES OF LAW ENFORCEMENT... and then blamed for breaking.

The list of Family Court Suicides is extensive and heartbreaking... and ignored by everyone. People fear what will happen to them if they care enough to get involved... and they should. These people know how to annihilate a person. They have had plenty of experience.

I am Terance Healy. This is the story of A Terroristic Divorce. This is the story of concealing injustice and the actions which eventually involved an entire county judiciary - where their actions to conceal an initial injustice became broader and more involved because their own actions had to then be concealed.

This is the story of A LIFE WITHOUT PROTECTION OF THE LAW... without Constitutional Rights... and an experience which lead to the realization of the needle in the haystack of injustice and those responsible. The sedition and corruption and perversion of justice brought to you by the American Bar Association - controlling judges and lawyers and undermining the judiciary and law enforcement at every level of the state and federally.

The American Bar Association has failed to comply or respond to the CEASE & DESIST letter sent to every national, state and affiliated organization - which included EVERY STATE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE.

We have presented the issue of the ABA's Rule 1.6 to thousands of legislators, law enforcement, lawyers and the judiciary. While INJUSTICE is in the national consciousness, they fail to act. They fear each other far more than an angry American population.

Proclaim JUSTICE throughout All the Land
Unto All the Inhabitants thereof.

America is waking up to the injustice. The family and friends of the largest prison population in the world is recognizing the ABA's response to the advance of civil rights in the 60's was the injustice and incarceration concealed by Rule 1.6 since the 80's.

Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane, how about addressing those two court orders from unidentified judges and unidentified courts... or introducing someone who can.

"We are not investigating. I cannot investigate."

"I am being stopped from performing my duties as Attorney General."

"My office is being stopped from certain investigations."

"And we are being stopped even from telling why."

"My hands are tied and this will be frustrating for you because it is just as frustrating for me."

"My hands are tied because there are court orders which don’t allow us to say certain things which I believe the public needs to know."

"I knew that I was walking into public corruption. Which again is why I ran."

"But I will tell you this. Even I am shocked at the level of public corruption."
I am shocked at how deep it goes.
I am shocked at how powerful it is.
I have never seen anything like this. It’s breathtaking.
It has been described by the people familiar with what is happening as shameful."

"But, if this can be done to me as Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer of the 5th largest state in the country, i am sickened to think what can and may be done to regular, good people who don;t have the resources that I have to challenge it."

I would tell my story to the media... but, their lawyers won't allow it.

** Carluccio's defective and void order was issued May 9, 2011, BUT it was not the first order which lacked jurisdiction, notice and correction. The Secret Order of Judge Rhonda Lee Daniele had been issued in August 2007, never distributed, never docketed, without any proceeding, concealed in a separate court file, used to undermine EVERY proceeding, and FOUND IN AUGUST 2010. The terror of the Montgomery County Court continued with the additional threat to courthouse staffers who revealed the corruption. Since 2007, the entire court case, every petition and proceeding, had been a complete farce to terrorize me. THEY JUST WON"T STOP.

Email + Carluccio ÷ Tornetta x 1.6 = COVERUP

When Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio wanted to secretly cancel hearings she did so via email.

The Courthouse was stunned to learn that I had the praecipe numbers which indicated that multiple hearings had been cancelled by email. No one would take responsibility or explain.
Court Administration had cancelled the hearings without notice or entry... and without Court Order.

When Judge Carluccio was asked about the cancellations SHE LIED indicating it was an error. At the end of that session, she forgot so I reminded her to reschedule. She did.

THEN, she cancelled those rescheduled hearings by email - without notice AGAIN. So, much for the 'error' excuse.

Well, all but one was cancelled. A 15 minute window. If I did not appear for that hearing she could use THAT as the excuse to ignore and dismiss ALL the petitions. BUT, I showed up prepared to address all 15 matters. There was no hearings. Cancelled Without Notice... AGAIN.

Where was the opposing party? Their setup was exposed. They had written indicating they were aware of the hearing, BUT THEY DID NOT SHOW UP. I got their letter 2 days later. BOY, THEIR SETUP WAS EXPOSED. EPIC FAIL:

The judge had indicated to Court Administration on the day before that she would neither confirm or deny the hearing was scheduled. WTF? Cheryl Leslie in Court Admin knew that the corruption was overwhelming in this matter. She could not explain the irrational lack of explanation. She knew, but could not explain. I knew too. They went to great lengths to fool a litigant and failed.

WHERE NO ONE EVER ASKED FOR THE DIVORCE DECREE, WHY WOULD JUDGE CARLUCCIO ISSUE ONE?

Carluccio issued a defective and void Divorce Decree in violation of PA Law and without any jurisdiction. The court was notified of the error. The deliberately defective and void order is being used to continue to ruin my life where everyone is ignoring the volume of information indicating it is void. Pretending the divorce decree is valid prevents any filing to address all those cancelled petitions on financial issues. It keeps the litigation going... an additional 4 years now in the Superior Court.

Fraud to conceal fraud and prevent any resolution of the fraud is what Rule 1.6 does to litigants in all kinds of injustice cases. Foreclosures, false imprisonment, false prosecution,...

Judges issue void orders deliberately because they know how other judges won't act where the error is exposed... or corrected. The subsequent judges commit fraud and act to further the error.

BUT, RULE 1.6 is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.... and those acts of fraud cannot be excused by an unconstitutional law.

Considering the effort of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania towards silencing the availability of emails - they updated Rule 1.6 about 7-8 times in the last 2 years... the Supreme Court knows there is something in emails that will demonstrate the abuse of power within the courts. Why are they updating an UNCONSTITUTIONAL law?

Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional, it causes a denial of constitutionally protected rights, it permits fraud to conceal fraud, it permits EVERY effort to conceal the fraud, it made fraud 'legal' for legal professionals... and MANDATORY, AND THEY CALLED IT ETHICAL.

When the American Bar Association had the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania enact Rule 1.6 into law where they DID NOT HAVE AUTHORITY to enact ANY law which affects substantive rights of a litigant which are guaranteed by the US Constitution.

Rule 1.6 is about concealing corruption and fraud within the judicial branch.
Rule 1.6 is an aggressively enforced MANDATE of Confidentiality.
Rule 1.6 is NOT ethical, yet is referenced throughout the 'ethical standard for legal professionals'
Rule 1.6 has permitted the American Bar Association to undermine the judiciary.
Rule 1.6 has concealed the ABA infiltration between the people and the courts, where the ABA staff intercepts and interferes with the administration of justice and prevents access to the courts.
Rule 1.6 is not helping the judiciary. The ABA is concealing that they have caused the judiciary to be UNDONE.
Rule 1.6 is holding the judiciary hostage with the threat of exposing that the judicial branch has been usurped and undermined by the American Bar Association.
BUT, Rule 1.6 is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. A NULLITY. NO LAW. NEVER REALLY WAS A LAW. NEVER EXISTED.

So when concealing how Rule 1.6 has caused a systemic problem within the judiciary, who better to approach the topic than a Special Prosecutor named CARLUCCIO.

Special Prosecutor Carluccio should know and understand the issues related to emails, Rule 1.6, concealing corruption, excusing fraud, denying constitutional rights as his wife, Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio WAS DOING ALL OF THOSE THINGS IN HER COURTROOM.

In Healy v Healy when Judge Carluccio's corruption was exposed she improperly issued a defective and void order calling it a divorce decree and using it to destroy a litigant who survived. That order lacked jurisdiction. It will NEVER have jurisdiction. So every subsequent judge involved IGNORES THE FAILURE and continues to attack her victim.

The Central Legal Staff of the Superior Court assumed the mantle of Rule 1.6 fraud, BUT WITHOUT THE PROTECTION of RULE 1.6 because their crimes PROVE the unconstitutional effect. RULE 1.6 is PROVEN to be unconstitutional within the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

NO DECISION OR ORDER HAS BEEN SIGNED BY ANY JUDGE. Rule 1.6 fraud concealing fraud.... but clearly without benefit of the hostage judge's participation. A VIOLATION OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW, the Rules of Appellate Procedure, the US Constitution, and Federal Crimes.

When Judge Carluccio used emails and void orders to conceal her corruption and injustice, she was also concealing that the American Bar Association had undermined the judiciary at state and federal levels.

At the time, Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio was also the President of the Montgomery County Bar Association.

Special Prosecutor Carluccio knows exactly what he is trying to conceal and his effort to permit continuing corruption is very clearly motivated.

He also knows his wife is dumb as a rock. She didn't think this up all by herself. She had no concept of her conflict of interest in real estate dealings. She made up laws from the bench with the belief that litigants are fools. She prevented the Barnes Foundation from remaining in Montgomery County by concealing available funds. She worked for the US Attorney for a while so she avoids federal investigation unless they bring someone in from outside the area.

Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio is a judicial terrorist.

UNCONSTITUTIONAL Rule 1.6 is not going to hide her abuse of power under color of law with intent to cause harm and irreparable damage.... and neither will her husband.

SO WHY SPEND SO MUCH TIME TRYING TO CONCEAL ACTIONS BEHIND AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW? It's been concealed since 1988 while the injustice destroyed people and families who could not turn to any legal professionals for resolution.

It's never going to be constitutional, lawful, ethical or good to commit, enable or conceal judicial corruption.

So much effort to enable corruption to continue.

CARLUCCIO's don't seem to have any grasp of CONFLICT OF INTEREST.

All this effort to mandate Kathleen Kane to be quiet about Rule 1.6 injustice and corruption - the thing she cannot reveal... while it destroys lives, and leads to suicide.

In the meantime, I am available to inform the Grand Jury, and the public, of what it is they won't allow the Attorney General to discuss.

I AM NOT RESTRICTED BY RULE 1.6 UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONFIDENTIALITY.

Superior Court of PA - CENTRAL LEGAL STAFF

The victim of Rule 1.6 injustice will discover a new group when the matter escalates up to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

The CENTRAL LEGAL STAFF is a group positioned between the litigant and the judiciary. This provides the opportunity for a new kind of corruption - intercept, misdirect and 'play judge'.

When they play judge, they are acting like the absent-minded professor of judges. The level of carelessness is clearly visible.

To maintain confidentiality, Rule 1.6 permits fraud to conceal prior fraud and the Central Legal Staff demonstrate such an extreme disrespect for the facts, the truth and the law that there is no denying the deception - this is not the work of a judge who has been on the bench for years.

PER CURIAM orders are only permitted in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania for 'housekeeping' types of issues.

Even when utilized for housekeeping or general scheduling, the Per Curiam Order will include the reference to the relevant Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure.

You file a Motion seeking the decision of the Superior Court regarding issues relative to the Appeal;
and receive a Per Curiam order dismissing or denying that motion,
one sentence,
with no further information,
with no reference to an applicable Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure,
which shows no indication of any review by any judge,
with no signature of a judge,
which ignores every issue in the motion,
without any explanation.

WHY DO THEY THINK THAT YOU ARE SO STUPID THAT YOU WILL NOT NOTICE?
(It is at times like this that my faith in humanity falters.)
It is hard to believe that so many people are working against you. They do not know you. You did not cause the lack of jurisdiction. Every time they fuck up, you lose more. And the system comes down harder on you.

A review of the Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Law relating to the business operation of the Superior Court fails to show any allowance for a Per Curiam order unless the issue is purely for scheduling or ‘housekeeping.’

Clearly, the motion did not go to any motions judge for review. The Central Legal Staff intercepted and disposed of your motion.

Pursuant to Rule 1.6, the Central Legal Staff may participate in fraudulent actions intended to prevent disclosure which could adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary, the Central Legal Staff office, coworkers and themselves.

The Central Legal Staff is not protecting the integrity of the judiciary, by intercepting the document. If they wanted to protect the integrity of the judge, they would make sure the judge had jurisdiction. And every effort is contrary to that task.

At best, the Central Legal Staff is preventing the judge from direct involvement in the action
- by obstructing justice,
- interfering with the administration of the courts,
- denying constitutional rights,
- participating in a conspiracy
- causing continued fraud against the victim,
- Rule 1.6 has usurped the Rule of Law and rights protected by the US Constitution.


The Central Legal Staff are members of the American Bar Association, the Philadelphia Bar Association, and other affiliated organizations.

The Central Legal Staff are compensated for presenting Continuing Legal Education (CLE) programs for the ABA and it’s various affiliated organizations.

THE CENTRAL LEGAL STAFF IS POSITIONED TO INTERCEPT...
Where every document must go through the CLS;
the issue has been neglected;
the decision fails to indicate any direct action or review by any judge;
the Motion was not vexatious or frivilous;
Rule 1.6 permits efforts by legal professionals which prevent disclosure of fraud;
an initial action or order lacked jurisdiction and represented a fraud;
CLS members are legal professionals and member of the various Bar Associations and affiliates;
CLS Members are compensated for presenting seminars for the Bar Associations;
When you asked for a signed copy of the document, YOU WERE DENIED.
When requesting the signed document, the clerks responses suggested you were paranoid or crazy;
When you petitioned the court for the signed document, it was ignored.
You have had to sign every copy of every document along with it’s verification and certificate of service.


It's not paranoia. It is a rape of the public trust.

Santa, the Easter Bunny, the Tooth Fairy were things which your parents convinced you to believe in which you later found out did not exist. The hopeful litigant had persevered undaunted while experiencing and documenting egregious and inescapable injustice persevering that every level of the courts may not have been undermined and usurped by Rule 1.6.

But, it happened.

What Changed?

After Watergate, the legal profession looked somewhat foolish because the lawyers did not understand who they represented, who they worked for and who they thought they were committing crimes on behalf of. As a result, several went to jail. The American Bar Association realized they had a problem. An ethics problem.... or lack of ethics problem.

The ABA set out to fix their ethics problem by codifying (MAKING LAW) of their Code of Conduct. To sell the concept, they called it 'ethics', BUT, the Model Rules of Professional Conduct are not ethical or moral. They are not even lawful. They ARE unconstitutional.

Previously, it was 'code' without legal teeth to enforce it. AS LAW, there was an aggressively enforced mandated for non-disclosure... which even went as far as preventing lawyers (District Attorneys, Attorneys general, US Attorneys) from prosecuting crimes. Everything pointed to ONE RULE enacted in every state which controlled the state and federal governments involvement, and denied the constitutional rights of the people who likely felt violated but never understood what happened to them or why. They made the 'discretionary' decision, into a mandate of non-disclosure. The difference between code and LAW.

Taking the Canons which had been practiced for hundreds of years, and merging them with the Code Of Conduct was the responsibility of the Kutak Commission. It took years to accomplish, but in the EARLY 80'S, the Model Rules of professional Conduct were presented to the American Bar Association Conference of Delegates - the ABA's pretend government.

At the loud, vocal, open insistence of over 2/3 of the Conference, the lawyers decided to make fraud legal. They called it ethical. While they focused on protecting their 'client fraud', Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information also prevented disclosure in a far broader spectrum of incidences.

THIS IS WELL DOCUMENTED. THEY DID IT ANYWAY.
On Ethics and Expediency: The ABA's Dubious Vote on Disclosure of Client Fraud by Charles E. Lundberg March-April 1983

THE ABA MADE FRAUD LEGAL AND CALL IT ETHICAL... but only for lawyers, and their clients... without any disclosure of who was responsible for the fraud. The standard exceptions demonstrate a sociopathic and self-indulgent psychosis.

1. Where the victim would be killed, the lawyer had 'discretion' to reveal the information. Sadistically keeping a victim on the line for further frauds. (I call this INTENT TO CAUSE SUICIDE.)
- or -
2. Where the lawyer was not compensated for his 'work'.

The ABA then proceeded to have each state supreme court enact their Model Rules into LAW. Starting in 1984 in New Jersey through 2009 in Maine, Fraud became legal Disclosure of the truth became illegal. Rule 1.6 was aggressively enforced by the state Supreme courts.

The states saw it for what it was AND ENACTED IT INTO LAW ANYWAY. With occasional exceptions added, but none which made the LAW ethical, moral or constitutional. How could they make fraud ethical? legal? As code it was discretionary - the good ole boy network - but as LAW everything changed.

Calling it Attorney Client privilege, lawyers would assert it and giggle through millions of foreclosures while neglecting the FACT that the constitutional rights of the innocent victim had been denied, and prevented from any recourse. Those who survived were left destitute, homeless and suicidal.

Rule 1.6 makes it ILLEGAL for a lawyer to disclose what happened.

Additionally, anyone addressing the unconstitutional affect on their rights, would have to pursue it through the judiciary, who enacted the unconstitutional law, who protected their 'integrity', whose shameful failure would allow and destroy millions in foreclosures, and thousands in Kids For Cash.

There are not many terrorized souls who have the wherewithal to find and prove the violation of their Constitutional Rights.

It's not easy to live, let alone litigate when you have NO RIGHTS, NO PROTECTION OF THE LAW., AND NO ESCAPE. The header of the web site indicates the situation where someone has lost their constitutionally protected rights.

I am a sane man dealing with an absolutely insane situation. Every person in a position to help has acted improperly in direct violation of procedures and the law preventing the resolution of any matter… they each make the situation worse… NO ONE HELPED… NO ONE COULD HELP.

The only difference. They pressed for a suicide that I could not deliver. As a result, I found the needle in the haystack of injustice. The subsequent response of the judiciary demonstrates their loss of judicial independence. Further demonstrating the corruption of EVERY state and federal judiciary. They conceal that they had allowed themselves to become UNDONE.

A problem such as this could be resolved within minutes when the public learned what had occurred...

The media black out of the story demonstrates a very strong controlling power by the ABA. Fraud is legal for lawyers, and that is a tool they use to prevent their exposure.

The US Constitution is stronger. JUSTICE IS COMING.

---

KATHLEEN KANE. My patience with your inaction is running thin. Do your job.

There is not one government official doing anything to preserve, protect, support, defend, or enforce the US Constitution.

Why bother to take an oath if you are mandated to ignore it? MMM YEA... Lawyers are allowed to commit fraud.

Follow your oath, or RESIGN.

Attorney-Client Privilege.... BULLSHIT!!!

An attorney may not disclose information which would harm a client... and offend the sacrosanct attorney-client privilege which continues into the beyond after the death of the attorney... WHY IS IT THAT FOR 30 YEARS THE WORLD HAS NEGLECTED TO CALL THE ABA ON THEIR BULLSHIT (quietly made law in every state since 1984.)

I assure you that 'ACP' has affected WAY MORE cases in civil and family court, than the criminal cases which the ABA loudly presumes to necessitate the privilege. Where the horseshit ascends to take on constitutional propriety, you just know they are making this stuff up. It is FLAWED to think that the attorney-client privilege is more important than EVERYONE ELSE's constitutional rights.

Eric Holder is the retiring US Attorney General. Prosecutor, judge, high-powered lawyer representing the President, the NFL, Merck (Pharmaceuticals), Halliburton and big banks...

When Holder was presented for the position of US Attorney General... "Colleagues and admirers see his impressive range of work as a sign of a lawyer who has seen the law from all sides." TRANSLATION: His former clients just renewed their license to commit fraud without fear of prosecution at state and federal levels.

Tell me again why they fail to acknowledge that ERIC HOLDER can be prevented from prosecuting any of his former clients? ... and those who report to him are similarly trapped. As the top lawyer in the DOJ, he cannot reveal any wrongdoing by his department (his client). So the Rule 1.6 'law' made him silent on Fast & Furious. They have big shoulders to take the personal aspersions, while laughing at Americans who don't see what is right in front of them. They have made it illegal to expose corruption.

That stupid headline allegation was such clear disinformation.
"NOT ONE BANK WAS PROSECUTED DURING THE FORECLOSURE CRISIS" - If you think it was personal, you have little faith in the morality and ethics of humans. It was NOT the lawyer, but ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE which protected the banks.

Once they made Rule 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY into "LAW". Rule 1.6 prevented any prosecution for the fraud by District Attorneys, Attorneys General and US Attorneys, the entire US DOJ and every government lawyer must follow the very same Rule 1.6 - See McDade-Murtha Amendment.

(Why is everything surrounding Rule 1.6 CORRUPTION BY CONFIDENTIALITY coming out of Pennsylvania - with emphasis on Scranton-Wilkes Barre? I really do not know that answer. I was one breath away from that question almost being answered yesterday. The call disconnected. Not able to reconnect.)

Where lawyers advanced fraudulent and robosigned paperwork, and successfully foreclosed on people - some homeowners did not even have mortgages on the property. Get this, that same attorney-client privilege may have also concealed that 'there was NO BANK INVOLVED', just a lawyer who knew his actions would be protected by Rule 1.6 Attorney-Client Privilege. BUT, Rule 1.6 is not called that.

Rule 1.6 is called CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION - it is a very broad application of confidentiality which conceals and protects, the courts, the judges, the lawyers, and possibly their clients too. BUT, if you do any reading on the topic, the protection for their clients is moreso the pretty dress on a pig named "INJUSTICE".

Rule 1.6 is SO CLEARLY STOOPID, that it prevents prosecution where the lawyer (aka prosecutor, DA, Attorney General, US Attorney) has ever represented the 'accused'. THEY MADE IT A LAW... and the courts enforce it aggressively. They must conceal that the courts were undermined. To protect their judicial integrity... that ship has sailed... and has also been prevented from docking ever again (even when under the name of Reform.)


Ethics Reforms by the American Bar Association... ROFLMAO. The ABA made ethics illegal.

The ABA deliberately removed two fraud provisions from their Rule of Professional Conduct in 1983. The provisions had prevented a fraud from continuing, or ever being rectified... THE LAWYERS REMOVED THE LAW FROM THEIR 'PROFESSIONAL ETHICS" DELIBERATELY. ON PURPOSE. BY VOTE (est 200-100). IN SPITEFUL DEFIANCE OF THE KUTAK COMMISSION's documents.

AND NOT ONE LAWYER HAS EVER QUESTIONED THE AFFECT ON THE VICTIM'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.

Rule 1.6 is responsible for shredding the US Constitution. Well-written and Noted Horse's ass Monroe Freedman, (Author of In Praise of Overzealous Representation - Lying to Judges, Deceiving Third Parties, and Other Ethical Conduct) always has a lie ready in defiance of ethics, indicated that

"We live in a Surveillance State in a Surveillance World. It is ever-expanding and omnipresent. It can never be removed or restricted, and our Constitution, with its Bill of Rights and separation of powers, has been lost forever."

EXCUSE ME... Mr. Asshole... You have written about ethics ad vomitum. Are you claiming a victory in that sentence? Or are you a some special kind of new stupid?

CONSIDER the American Bar Association neglected to consider the rights of the innocent victim of their fraud (or their client's fraud). When their 'mythical duty' of attorney-client secrecy stepped all over the rights and liberties secured and protected by the US Constitution... and wasn't just a trade standard anymore because THEY MADE IT LAW.

Well, their 'mythical duty' is repugnant. Not a law. A nullity. Unconstitutional.

While they may have made it 'legal' for every lawyer, every judge and every level of law enforcement to conceal their crime, and obstruct justice, and deny constitutional rights.

Abuse of power under color of law - seems that you are not allowed to pretend it is ok to deny a person of their constitutional rights. When you oathed 'preserve, protect, defend, support, enforce...' you failed when you IGNORED... the Constituition of the United States.

AND along comes Krautheim and Healy, swinging the US Constitution, where the systemic infiltration of RULE 1.6, has been demonstrated by further acts of obstruction, denial and abuse EVEN IN THEIR ACTUAL CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE litigation. They demonstrated the loss of the very constitutional rights we filed to address. We didn't need more evidence... or further failures of ethics and integrity.

Now when you have to turn to those who have committed a federal crime to fix the situation... where do you begin?

1) Expose the Problem and have everyone FIX IT.
2) Prosecute the crime against those same folks - who neglected to fix it when asked previously. NEGLECTED ALOT.
3) File for Civil Damages against the same folks. This must wait until it is fixed. Because SERIOUSLY... you proved it... you have no constitutional rights, no protection of the law, and "Constitution, with its Bill of Rights and separation of powers, has been lost forever."... courtesy of the American Bar Association.

The Constitution is not LOST. Scan for problems. Fix/Purge. REBOOT!

AMERICA REBOOTED.

References:
OUR INALIENABLE RIGHTS CAN NEVER BE RECOVEREDD by Monroe Freedman

In Praise of Overzealous Representation - Lying to Judges, Deceiving Third Parties, and Other Ethical Conduct by Monroe Freedman

Let no man be ashamed to speak what he is not ashamed to think.

Non pudeat dicere, quod non pudet sentire.
“Let no man be ashamed to speak what he is not ashamed to think."

In a document titled
COMPLIANCE, CREATIVE DEVIANCE, AND RESISTANCE TO LAW: A Theory of the Attorney-Client Privilege,
Norman W. Spaulding begins with the latin phrase, and the following paragraph.

"The legal profession has not been candid about the purpose of the attorney-client privilege. Our lack of candor now verges on duplicity. We seem to be ashamed to admit what we do for our clients under cover of the privilege. And with our shame and circumlocution, confusion and controversy about the doctrine has multiplied.

We should not be ashamed. The time has come to be “full and frank,” as the saying goes."

---

I disagree... It's 30 years late... The time had long since passed for 'full and frank' discussions.

There is great shame in what the American Bar Association has done to destroy the integrity of the judiciary, and to rape the public trust.

The ABA deception shames an entire nation who mourns the victims of deliberate deviant "professional" efforts who did not survive, while millions upon millions have lost everything to the avarice and greed of a twisted organization without ethics, morality or humanity.

Yet, while they hide behind the client - real or imaginary, a lawyer could never break a law.

This is fact, but only while every lawyer crime may be concealed by the 'professional ethics' of the lawyer... and the sun has set on those days. The Constitutional Rights of the innocent victim will not be ignored any further.

As I indicated to the American Bar Association in August 2013.
"I know what you have done. I am coming for my Constitutional Rights." - Terance Healy


THERE IS CAUSE FOR ALARM. THERE IS NOTHING THAT THE ABA WOULD NOT DO TO CONTINUE IN THEIR LAWLESSNESS. BEHEADINGS, EBOLA, GENOCIDE, NO LIMITS TO ANY AND ALL METHODS TO KEEP PEOPLE DISTRACTED FROM THE 30 YEAR RAPE OF THE PUBLIC TRUST WHILE THE JUDICIARY WAS HELD HOSTAGE.

The AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION has beheaded Liberty and shit down her throat for the last 30 years.

I get knocked down, but I get up again.

I get knocked down, but I get up again. You're never gonna keep me down.

The American victim of injustice loses their constitutional rights. Where the integrity of the judiciary is concerned, the effort to prevent exposure of the judicial corruption involved extends beyond realistic reasoning or reasonable comprehension. There is no help. No escape. No recovery.

The innocent victim will be attacked until they are 1) Homeless/Destitute, 2) Incarcerated or 3) a Suicide.



Anyone can be the innocent victim of injustice in America. All it takes is a simple injustice by a judge, incidental or deliberate. There is no escape.

In America, the judiciary has been undermined by the American Bar Association in acts of sedition which extend back to 1984 in New Jersey where the unconstitutional Rules of Professional Conduct were first improperly enacted into unconstitutional law. The judicial branch was compromised.

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality was LAW - an aggressively enforced mandate of Confidentiality which concealed a collateral denial of constitutionally protected rights. Lawyers and judges are prevented from revealing this because it would adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary and the reputation of lawyers.

Even though they know the unconstitutional law is a nullity, the lawyers abide by it. The lawyers conceal it.

The ABA sedition continued to every state. The judiciary has become undone.

Americans can see this, but they just don't realize the full effect or accept it. Yet.

These truths, as they say, are self evident.

Persevere, JUSTICE is coming.

I get knocked down, but I get up again. You're never gonna keep me down.
I get knocked down, but I get up again. You're never gonna keep me down.
I get knocked down, but I get up again. You're never gonna keep me down.
I get knocked down, but I get up again. You're never gonna keep me down.
I get knocked down, but I get up again. You're never gonna keep me down.
I get knocked down, but I get up again. You're never gonna keep me down.

Confidentiality Manipulated to Destroy an Adversary

"The Model Rules serve to advance the duty of preserving a client’s confidences at the expense of those injured by a fraud by the client." - American Bar Association

Without regard for the victim, Confidentiality is applicable to lawyer-client fraud.
Confidentiality is system-wide - incorporating ALL lawyers, ALL judges, and ALL law enforcement.
[ The "THEY" to whom the victims of injustice often refer. ]

This Confidentiality has no support in ethics, morality or law. A repugnant failure in logic, morality and ethics, this practice could never become a proper law under the US Constitution... unless lawyers, judges and law enforcement ignored the lawlessness and their professional oaths. This is exactly what they did.

In 1983, the American Bar Association knew that their Model Rules were unconstitutional. Yet, the ABA proceeded to every state supreme court misrepresenting the Model Rules as a code of ethical conduct to be enacted into law.

The Rules of Professional Conduct recognize that a lawyer/client may commit a fraud and take advantage of the lawyers services in the commission of the crime.

CONFIDENTIALITY EXTRAPOLATED: A client could manipulate their lawyer to participate in a fraud, and A lawyer could manipulate their client to participate in a fraud. and A lawyer could manipulate the judge to participate in a fraud. Confidentiality prevents disclosure to the victim. Confidentiality requires obstruction by ALL lawyers, ALL judges and ALL law enforcement. - Unified AGAINST the victim of a fraud. Confidentiality extends to and encourages further frauds against the victim. This 'Confidentiality' has no support in Ethics, Morality or Law. Permission to undermine integrity and obstruct justice remains WRONG, even when concealed in a professional code, an ethics policy or a law.

The scenario is presented sincerely and without unnecessary suggestions or broad aspersions to the integrity of the judiciary.

The problem is a systemic mandate for participation AGAINST the victim.
All available personnel and resources can be utilized towards the efforts to maintain Confidentiality.
The victim is denied and prevented information preventing redress or resolution of the fraud.
The victim is further exposed for future acts of fraud equally protected under confidentiality.
The victim is prevented from any justice.
The victim is prevented from life, liberty and happiness.
The victim is prevented from any escape.

Where the judiciary has been manipulated, the judge is mandated to sacrifice their integrity to conceal their own involvement, or to conceal the involvement of prior judges.

Where a judge may take action to address the lawyer's manipulation, Confidentiality prevents the lawyer's client from being adversely affected, while permitting the victim to be further victimized.

Where the judge may report the lawyer for disciplinary action, Confidentiality creates a void around the situation which prevents the victim from presenting that evidence for appropriate consideration by the court, further denying justice, relief or protection of the law.

Where the disciplinary board may briefly suspend the lawyer, confidentiality prevents the victim from the information or any explanation while the courts neglect to schedule proceedings during the suspension.

Daily penalties, directly related to the litigation before the court, potentially accrue while the court fails to schedule the hearing until the suspension is served. Confidentiality of the complaint, any proceeding, and the decision is maintained while the victim is prevented from proceedings; denied explanation for the delay; and faces the daily multiplier applied to any penalty.

Confidentiality prevents the judge from any explanation for adjusting the accounting. The fraud is rewarded at the expense of the victim.

In Disciplinary Proceedings, where the lawyer admits guilt, the entire process and outcome is kept confidential. Rule 1.6 provides an incentive to commit fraud which will trigger Confidentiality and undermine the opponent.

The Confidentiality extends to every aspect of the case, the victim is further victimized in every instance.

Efforts to conceal 'Confidential' information from the victim expands to involve the court and courthouse staff in the deception and conspiracy in furtherance of the fraud.

The victim presents evidence and testimony. The lawyer neglects to address or counter the testimony where 'confidentiality' applies. In orders and opinions, the judge neglects to address 'confidential information' in Findings Of Fact or Considerations. Confidentiality leverages evidence and testimony to be ignored and not considered even when discovered and presented.

When the failure to address the testimony, evidence and rule of law is raised, the judge recuses without explanation. The judges integrity is sacrificed to participate in a fraud while the victim is denied redress, resolution or justice.

Under the Model Rules, the victim is denied the protection of the law, the state constitution and the US Constitution with no opportunity for resolution or escape from further incidents. The victim is prevented from justice by a system-wide conspiracy of Confidentiality initiated by a fraud. The fraud being unintentional, or deliberate, is inconsequential to the systemic affect on the victim.

In civil, criminal and family courts, a single act of fraud is all that is necessary to trigger a complete loss of rights, due process and protection of the law pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality from which there can be no escape.

The Model Rules collaterally deny, obstruct and prevent the constitutional rights of a litigant.

Not Constitutional, so it cannot be law.
Not Ethical, so it cannot be an ethics policy.
Not Moral, so it cannot be a moral principle.

Rule 1.6 Mandates Confidentiality where an unintentional, or deliberate, act of fraud committed by a lawyer or their client is ignored, excused and concealed while affecting the proceedings and undermining the authority and integrity of the judiciary which denies prevents and obstructs any just resolution and leaves a litigant exposed to future injustice by simple reference. Rule 1.6 is unethical, immoral, unconstitutional, repugnant, unlawful, dishonest, and contradicts the very nature and purpose of a judicial system.

As a Professional Code, the Confidentiality decision was at the discretion of the lawyer. Where that discretion may violate law, ethics, and morality, the discretion for the decision rested with the lawyer along with any liability and responsibility.

WHEN ENACTED INTO LAW, the Confidentiality became a MANDATE with the collateral effect including the loss of constitutional protections which denied redress or resolution within the courts; prevented prosecution of the fraud; and endorsed abuses of power under color of law by every level of state and federal law enforcement. No accountability. No liability. No responsibility. Leaving a litigant without basic human rights, civil rights, constitutional rights or hope.

Clearly affecting the substantive rights of a litigant, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania lacked the authority under PA Const Article V Section 10(c) to enact Rule 1.6 to law.

This unconstitutional law which has been improperly enacted must be addressed by the Pennsylvania Legislature which has the exclusive authority under PA Const Article I Section 12 to suspend the improperly enacted unconstitutional law.

The Model Rules have no basis in truth, morality, or ethics.
The Model Rules contradict the American values defined in the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights and the US Constitution.

For all those years as a Code of Conduct, the Model Rules had included the fraud provisions which permitted disclosure.

In 1983, Removing the fraud provisions caused the Model Rules to become unethical, immoral, unlawful, inappropriate, unconstitutional and repugnant.

Rebranding unconstitutional Model Rules as an Ethics Standard to promote them to be improperly enacted into law, the American Bar Association exposes a sociopathic disrespect and contempt for the judiciary and abject malfeasance towards a nation who will be terrorized by their systemic perversion of justice.

Specifically, the needle in the ABA haystack of injustice, Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information is a deliberate deception. On its face, Rule 1.6 indicates ALL MISCONDUCT MUST BE REPORTED to the proper authority. Upon application of cross references throughout the Model Rules, the requirement to report misconduct is entirely undone. Rule 1.6 was not titled "REPORT ALL MISCONDUCT".

Lawyers are often accused of twisting words.
Unethical Ethics Standard???
Unconstitutional Law???
Professional Conduct???

There is no denying or excusing the result of the ABA's efforts, their knowledge of the unconstitutional effect, the deliberate misrepresentations to the Judiciary, the sedition of their actions upon the state and federal governments, and the limits which they would exceed to conceal their crime against an entire nation.

At no time was the ABA protecting the integrity of the judiciary and the reputation of lawyers as much as protecting the organization's interests which usurped judicial authority through manipulative actions which perverted justice. The ABA shamed and corrupted state and federal judiciary and robbed it's membership, and the legal profession, of integrity and honor.

Pretending that corruption was legal.

What the hell were they thinking?

Everyone participating in silence?

Persevere. Justice is Coming.

Every. Person. Matters.

Those lawyers who parrot that America has the 'greatest judicial system in the world' may only believe that because they were successful in stealing 40 million homes through foreclosure fraud while avoided any prosecution because of Confidentiality.

No ordinary American cares about their constitutional rights. CORRECT!!!!

Vice President Biden is absolutely CORRECT!!!

The meme/picture gets alot of play on the web with people indicating that the Vice President is wrong, uninformed, and a variety of other aspersions.

Americans have been trained to ignore the TRUTH. In spite of facts and experience, the TRUTH and the messenger are attacked for challenging a belief and trust. The American Government would never let that happen.

BUT, it did.

---

When you consider that the American Bar Association began implementing their effort in 1984 in New Jersey. Sold as Ethics Policy for Lawyers, every state supreme court enacted the ABA Model Rules between 1984 and 2009. The Model Rules have no basis in ethics or morality.

The ABA knew that their Confidentiality clause would require an attorney to NOT expose a fraud committed by their client EVEN where the attorney was manipulated into being a part of the crime.

Attorney-Client privilege. BULLSHIT! It is a mandate to participate in fraud and further frauds against a victim who is being denied their constitutional protections.

Those who swear to preserve, protect, defend, enforce, support, ... the US Constitution were also mandated to conceal the fraud. It affects every level of state and federal court, every lawyer and federal attorney.

AND THEY DID.

Over 40 million homes foreclosed through fraud.

Over 4000 children and families affect in Cash for Kids.

Uncounted suicides by those victimized by the injustice and prevented any resolution or escape.

Simple execution. Get each court to enact their Professional Code into LAW under their authority to enact law for the business of the courts. Conceal that the Rules cause an unconstitutional denial of protected rights. The choice regarding confidentiality which had been discretionary as LAW is MANDATED.

In 1983, the ABA had removed two provisions from Rule 1.6 Confidentiality which permitted a lawyer to speak where silence would conceal or permit “substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another”;
and
where the lawyer was seeking “to rectify the consequences of a client’s criminal or fraudulent act in the furtherance of which the lawyer’s services have been used.”

Yep, the American Bar Association planned ahead for foreclosure fraud and more... no one went to jail.

BUT, the unconstitutional impact of the law prevents the state supreme court from proper authority to enact the law. BUT, THEY DID ENACT THE LAW IN EVERY STATE.

The CONFIDENTIALITY of Rule 1.6 prevents any lawyers from exposing the situation, and prevents the courts from correcting or resolving the situation. BUT, IT'S NOT A LAW SO THEY DON'T HAVE TO FOLLOW IT.

The level of intimidation and threat which prevents this issue from being addressed must be big. Very big. So much so that no one has fixed it while it has destroyed millions of lives. MILLIONS.

In Pennsylvania, the ability to suspend law is available only to the Legislature. The entire Legislature has been notified. NOTHING. Meetings held with state Senator Chuck McIlhinney. NOTHING. Meetings with State Representative Marguerite Quinn and Kathy Watson.

The level or fear, terror and peril in Kathy Watson's voicemail message when she cancelled subsequent meetings was palpable. She had gone to police. I went to police also. I assured police that I had not made any threat against Rep Watson. Knowing that she was preparing to formally present the matter before the Legislature, it is entirely conceivable that she had been threatened.

This is big. The American Bar Association planned and executed the sedition of the judicial branch, in every state and federally. The ABA had undermined the Rule of Law, the US Constitution, the state constitution.

With the courts authority usurped, the courts were subjected to leverage and manipulation. Courts lost their judicial independence which is a necessity for jurisdiction. That independence is so essential that the judiciary is granted immunity from prosecution for anything as a safeguard of their independence. The courts continued to function without lawful authority.

The affect on the integrity of the courts was visible. The public trust had been violated. YET, STILL NO ONE EXPLAINED, OR CORRECTED, or preserved, protected, defended, supported, or enforced the US Constitution.

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality prevents lawyers and the judiciary from action.

Though an unconstitutional law is a nullity, exposing sedition and treason by the American Bar Association with it's over 400,000 members might be somewhat intimidating.

The lawyers are silent. The politicians are silent. The courts are silent.

Because their unconstitutional law, which denies constitutional rights, has undermined the government and been used to terrorize the American People.

And Americans watched as the rights of their neighbors were denied. They did nothing.
It affected millions. They did nothing.
The fraud upon the court was exposed and publicized. They did nothing.
When Americans need their rights, they are NOT available.

Americans do not care about their Constitutional Rights. Joe Biden is ABSOLUTELY CORRECT, BUT that is about as much as counselor Biden is permitted to reveal without violating Rule 1.6 Confidentiality.

Notice the politicians ignoring the US Constitution. They want Americans to notice. BUT, perhaps they are trying to demonstrate that it is time for American to care.

Remove Unconstitutional Rule 1.6 and the US Constitution is reBooted.

Let's clarify the Veeps message:

No ordinary American cares about their Constitutional Rights, ... I wish they did.

Ethics becomes No Ethics at All

In 1987, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court enacted the Rules of Professional Conduct into law describing the rules as "a minimal ethical standard" for the practice of law.


Ethics seeks to resolve questions dealing with human morality - concepts such as good and evil, right and wrong, virtue and vice, justice and crime.

Ethics involves systematizing, defending and recommending concepts of right and wrong conduct, and methods to address disputes.

Ethical Standards are principles which when followed, promote values such as trust, good behavior, fairness, and/or kindness.

There are four general factors which are involved in ethics.
1) Law, 2) Policies, 3) Individual Application. 4) Consequences

1) Law - A society is bound by laws. These laws define the difference between right and wrong, and what is considered acceptable behavior. People must abide by the laws.

2) Policies - Within society, or within smaller groups, a set of clearly stated, highly ethical policies takes the guesswork out of decisions made which represent the group. When properly trained, members actions and reactions become second nature. Ensuring those policies are ethically sound removes the possibility for improper actions or decisions.

3) Individual Ethics - Individuals determine their personal integrity and moral values based on heritage and upbringing, education, and positive reinforcement of ethical actions.

4) Consequences - The consequences for ignoring or breaking an ethical standard exist within each factor. Violate the law and you will be prosecuted. Violating a policy and the infraction affects the group - the action affects the respect accorded the group and can negatively impact the morale of other members. Noncompliance with ethical standards at the individual level damages integrity and reputation.

An Ethics Policy MUST provide a process to resolve conflicts which permits those experiences to benefit the individual through information, the group through policy adjustment and training, and society which can enact laws to prevent future conflict.

Where ethical conflict resolution does not develop and promote ethical behavior, the individual, the group and the society are prevented from the experience, knowledge and reinforcement of an ethical standard.

Ethics develop personal integrity and moral values. Groups benefit from the personal ethics of members which further promotes the reputation and integrity of the group. Society systematizes, promotes and defends the laws developed from the moral and ethical standards of the people.

A societies concept of good and evil, right and wrong, virtue and vice, justice and crime is derived from the values of it's people.

Ethical behavior is good, right, virtuous and just. Unethical behavior is evil, wrong, a vice and a crime.

A society uses laws to promote, protect and encourage the ethical behaviors and beliefs within the society while discouraging, prosecuting and correcting the unethical ones.


FOUNDED ON PRINCIPLES

The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights and The Constitution of the United States include the basic concepts upon which the United States was established. The documents include the general principles and ethics for our society which have been and are used to understand, interpret and develop the laws.

The US Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land - the moral and ethical standard under which our society agrees to exist.

Federal Law cannot exist where it violates the US Constitution.

State Constitutions exist within the framework established in the US Constitution.

State Law cannot exist where it violates the State Constitution or the US Constitution.

If any law is unconstitutional, it is not a law. EXCEPT... that only works in principle. Until a law is not a law, it is still pretty much a law. Lawmakers review proposed laws during their construction for constitutionality, and sometimes a situation is not realized. The Not-A-Law gets enacted, signed by the Executive, and that Not-A-Law then begins to affect the society.

The unconstitutional Not-A-Law is not consistent with the moral and ethical standards of society and can cause 'damage' to individuals or groups until the issue is addressed.

On Petition, the courts review the issue of constitutionality and decide if
a) The law is the law.
b) The Not-A-Law is a nullity.

** The Courts have dismissed the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6. The basis for dismissal is unsubstantiated. The doctrine for dismissal does not apply to pre-emptive constitutional challenges. Facts are ignored. Everything dismissed on paper without any hearings.

PRESENTMENT OF UNETHICAL RULES BY THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION ENACTED BY STATE SUPREME COURTS INTO UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW

The American Bar Association developed the Rules of Professional Conduct and presented them as an ethical standard for lawyers. "The Rules" are actually not based or supported by ethical or moral principles. "The Rules" are based on continuing in the way things have always been done - using the same flawed logic for supporting statements. One pervasive concept throughout the ABA ethics program is the constant cross reference to Rule 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY of INFORMATION.

Rule 1.6 is a deception. At face value, Rule 1.6 requires the lawyer take responsibility and accountability by reporting all acts of misconduct to disciplinary authorities. That moral high ground erodes quickly upon application of the cross references which mandate silence. Excusing silence where the information would adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary... or affect the reputation of the legal profession... or affect their law offices... or affect their client. The resultant Rule 1.6 is empty and left completely ineffective to address reporting the misconduct which on its face could suggest esteem-worthy. In the void left behind, Rule 1.6 is an aggressively enforced mandate of confidentiality which conceals corruption and injustice within the judiciary and the legal profession. [Shaking Head] Well, Rule 1.6 is not titled REPORTING MISCONDUCT - because it's not about that. Rule 1.6 is titled CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION - and it is all about silence, and maintaining confidentiality without the interference of ethics, morals or conscience.

A Group has presented their group policy to the state to elevate into law.

WHY? [No Answer]

As a group policy, constitutionality is not generally problematic. Group Policies must still follow the LAW. Group policies typically refine or specify "a higher ethical standard" which benefits the group through higher esteem, reputation and integrity.

The ABA knows that the "Model Rules" violate the US Constitution. In February 1983, the ABA House of Delegates had met, debated and decided to further remove provisions in the Confidentiality clause. Already constitutionally questionable, the removal further affected the rights of the victims of fraud.

The ABA removed two provisions from Rule 1.6 Confidentiality which permitted a lawyer to speak where silence would conceal or permit “substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another";
and
where the lawyer was seeking "to rectify the consequences of a client’s criminal or fraudulent act in the furtherance of which the lawyer’s services have been used.”

The decision by the ABA is clearly on the wrong side of the law, AND contrary to the moral and ethical standards of society.

WHY DID THE ABA PRESENT THEIR RULES TO THE STATE SUPREME COURTS TO ELEVATE INTO LAW KNOWING THAT THEIR CONFIDENTIALITY CLAUSE WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL?

Participating in a crime, voluntarily or not, lawyers are mandated to conceal information which denies, prevents and obstructs justice. The revised Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information affect the victim's rights which are believed o be secured by the First Amendment, Fourth Amendment, Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment, Tenth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. Further, the mandated silence causes the lawyer to directly participate in the commission and furtherance of a crime, and to conceal that personal participation and involvement from all law enforcement authorities.

Seriously, the "minimum ethical standard' joke should have been the punchline. The ABA Model Rules is a code of unethical conduct, enacted into unconstitutional law, MANDATING a lawyer sacrifice personal reputation, ethics, integrity and morality.

The 'minimal ethical standard' descriptor seems greatly over-exaggerated where the rules require unethical, immoral, and illegal behaviors.

A Group policy which violates ethics, morality, justice and the Law destroys the ethical integrity of the group.

THE CONTRADICTION IS OBVIOUS. ABA ETHICS ARE JUXTAPOSED

The ABA mandated unethical and immoral participation in criminal actions by attorneys which permit the commission and furtherance of a fraud and the conspiracy to conceal the crime from law enforcement and prosecution. The ABA's Rules of Professional Conduct is void of ethical considerations.

And...
But...
The American Bar Association has actually done it. The ABA has made unethical behavior a requirement within their Rules of Professional Conduct - their 'minimum ethical standard".

The unconstitutional law has been enacted by every state supreme court. It would take 25 years to find the constitutional problem. Rule 1.6 Confidentiality effectively concealed judicial corruption, injustice. The courts ignored the Rule of Law and the US Constitution without being held accountable.

The nation would quickly begin to notice that something is wrong with the US Constitution.

A President would snap that "The Constitution is just a god-damned piece of paper."

The stage was set. The fraud of the National Foreclosure Crisis began in states where the commission of fraud by lawyers within the court was kept CONFIDENTIAL. No one has been prosecuted.

NATIONAL FORECLOSURE CRISIS - FORECLOSURE BY FRAUD The ABA lack of ethics was exploited to foreclose upon the homes of MILLIONS AND MILLIONS of Americans while constitutional rights and the Rule of Law was ignored by the court. Every level of law enforcement was prevented from action ... by a confidentiality clause. ... by an unconstitutional confidentiality clause.

KIDS FOR CASH - Luzerne County Pennsylvania Two judges exploit the mandate of confidentiality while receiving kickbacks for placing over 4000 children in prisons. Lawyers and judges remained silent. Complaints to the PA Supreme court were unheeded. Human Trafficking of Children in Pennsylvania. AMERICAN CHILDREN were unprotected by the US Constitution, the PA Constitution and the Rule of Law. The lawyers and EVERY level of law enforcement was prevented from action ... by a confidentiality clause. ... by an unconstitutional confidentiality clause. Until a judge contacted federal authorities violating Rule 1.6 Confidentiality. Judge Ann Lokuta was promptly removed from the bench for adversely affecting the integrity of the judiciary. Ciavarella and Coonahan had been permitted to affect the integrity of the court under an unconstitutional veil of confidentiality.

Civil, Criminal and Family Courts - ALL AFFECTED An act of fraud, judicial misconduct or injustice is all that is required to cause the complete loss of constitutionally protected rights for litigants in the American courts. There is no one to enforce the US Constitution where every state and federal judiciary has lost judicial independence, jurisdiction and immunity all caused by a mandate of confidentiality. Americans are unprotected by the US Constitution, the PA Constitution and the Rule of Law when every lawyer and EVERY level of law enforcement is prevented from action ... by a confidentiality clause. ... by an unconstitutional confidentiality clause.

TREASON - A deliberate act of sedition by the American Bar Association which undermined the judiciary at state and federal levels and prevented the government from it's proper function.... executed in every state from 1984 to 2009.


DID NOT ONE OF THE 50 STATE SUPREME COURTS REVIEW THE RULES BEFORE THEY ENACTED LAW?

[COUNTERPOINT]
BUT, when a lawyer knows something is unconstitutional, they will fight for their client. They will report and expose the corruption within the judiciary.

That is a beautiful and respectable ideal which completely ignores reality.

Before the issue of corruption is heard in any court, the constitutional advocate/civil rights lawyer will be suspended from the practice of law, or disbarred, for adversely affecting the integrity of the judiciary and the reputation of lawyers.

The lawyer's personal reputation will be attacked. The lawyer's careers will be maligned. They will become disenfranchised from the community of lawyers. Those actions against the lawyer, though criminal, are considered acceptable and appropriate when exposing the truth would violate Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information - any publicity would adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary and the reputation of lawyers.

Additional events extend the same state Rule 1.6 Confidentiality Rule to include all state and federal courts... and every level of state and federal law enforcement. There seems to have been great effort has gone into assuring that an KNOWN TO BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL state law which inexplicably trumps the Rule of Law, the state Constitution and the US Constitution affects every court jurisdiction and all state and federal law enforcement.

Where the state Supreme Courts may have recognized their error, The Rule 1.6 Confidentiality clause prevents even the supreme court from addressing their own misdeed.

At every level of the courts, and law enforcement, there exists an ABA affiliated bar association and the opportunity to undermine and interfere with the course of justice. Efforts which prevent access to the courts, including forgery and issuing unsigned per curiam orders, are unexplained, omit facts, create fictions and fail to cite the applicable law. Rule 1.6 Confidentiality extends to conceal any effort action which prevent the judiciary from being adversely affected.

The Judiciary in whom the people placed their trust has become undone by the American Bar Association. The ABA has undermined the authority of the judiciary by affecting judicial independence which is an essential element for jurisdiction. The authority of the courts has been leveraged throughout the government undermining the Constitution, affecting and ignoring the overreach of the Executive, while observing the failure of the Legislative branch which is determined to accomplish nothing.

The United States Constitution needs to be rebooted.

Removing Unconstitutional Rule 1.6 is the first step it the recovery from the corruption and injustice of the last 25 years.


Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information is unconstitutional, immoral, unethical, improper, prevents, defies, conceals, undermines, usurps, destroys, overwhelms. Rule 1.6 KILLS.

Justice is coming.

Every. Person. Matters.