Overthrow in Pennsylvania - Judicial overthrows Executive and Legislative!

The Judicial Branch has ordered the Executive Branch to cease any investigation or prosecution... to conceal the corruption and usurpation of the Judicial Branch.

ATTORNEY GENERAL KATHLEEN KANE's COURT ORDERED SECRECY

The Judicial Branch can't order the Executive Branch not to enforce the laws of the Legislative Branch. Doing so by threatening disciplinary action demonstrates a broad overreach of the Judicial branch and a violation of the Separation of Powers. What would make them attempt this type of improper unconstitutional action?

If Judicial wished to excuse the crime after a hearing, they would act at that time in their forum - a PUBLIC forum.

To prevent public exposure of their corruption a hearing must be averted. But, any effort to prevent investigation would be visible.

There is no method by which the judiciary can prevent the other two branches from their responsibilities.

The judicial effort to prevent exposure has been publicly exposed and concealed by secrecy...

PUBLICLY AND SECRETLY, the judicial branch has ordered the Attorney General to inaction using two secret orders from two secret courts.

PUBLICLY AND SECRETLY, there are several Grand Jury's at work. One is investigating the Attorney General, but the grand jury is a tool of the Executive branch. Why has the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania called for a Grand Jury lead by Thomas Carluccio?

A grand jury seeking to suppress evidence of the unconstitutional actions of the judiciary is investigating the Attorney General. Chief Justice Ron Castille called for this Montgomery County Grand Jury. It is being run by Thomas Carluccio, whose wife Judge Caryolyn Tornetta Carluccio has issued defective and void orders without proper subject matter jurisdiction. Those corrupt orders are at the center of Healy v Healy and Healy v Miller and will eventually be the subject of federal litigation against the entire county, and the 20 judges from the Montgomery County Bench - all have lost any immunity because of the actions of Carluccio. Their actions demonstrated the unconstitutional influence of Rule 1.6 on the courts and law enforcement. THOMAS CARLUCCIO IS THE ONLY ATTORNEY IN THE COUNTY WHO COULD NOT BE COMPELLED TO GIVE TESTIMONY AGAINST HIS WIFE. Who better to learn and suppress the evidence in a case against the county judiciary.

For the Judicial branch to act before a hearing demonstrates an improper influence and control over the other two branches of government dismissing the lawmaker and the law enforcer. An egregious and obvious breach of the separation of powers established in the Constitution.

Where the Executive and Legislative have been participating by concealing the improper usurpation and undermining of the Judicial branch held hostage by the American Bar Association, their silence and inaction has given way to a demonstration of the absolute overthrow of the state government.

The American Bar Association controlled Judiciary has clearly overthrown the entire state government and wielded an improper unlawful and unconstitutional authority which demands the immediate attention of the People and their elected representatives.

Note to US DOJ: This situation exists in every state rolled out by the ABA from 1984 through 2009.

Rule 1.6 is their power and their downfall

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information has concealed their conspiracy and corruption, but once exposed as an unconstitutional law, the Judicial Branch was without explanation. Once challenged with clear evidence of the violation of constitutionally protected rights, the Judiciary was prompted to actions which exposed their overreach of authority.

THE KEY is Rule 1.6 - an unconstitutional law enacted by the Judiciary. Where the Executive would investigate and discover and prove the unconstitutional law, it would demonstrate the actions of the judiciary to conceal that their authority had been usurped and undermined by the American Bar Association by and through their enacting Rule 1.6 into law.

Ordering the Executive Branch to avoid investigation of the issue, shows an overreach of Judicial authority.

The Judiciary calling a Grand Jury to silence the Attorney General shows an overreach of Judicial authority.

The Judicial Branch has demonstrated their overreach and violation of the state constitution.

The Legislature was already removed from authority where the state judiciary improperly enacted a law which affected substantive rights and denied constitutional protections. A clear violation of the state constitution Article V Section 10(c).

The Pennsylvania Legislature has been asked to suspend Rule 1.6 as they have the authority to suspend any law. The Judiciary Committees have neglected to present the issue to the entire Legislature.

Rule 1.6 was the necessity which enabled the misuse of judicial authority. Once exposed as an unconstitutional nullity, the evidence of the corruption and perversion of justice would no longer be concealed.

As Rule 1.6 had become the "worst kept secret in Pennsylvania", the Judicial Branch acted in the open to suppress the matter exposing their usurpation of the Executive and Legislative branches.

THAT EXPLAINS EVERYTHING.

To the People:

Intervention is necessary.

Remove the American Bar Association. The ABA has done this in every state and federally. Rule 1.6 unconstitutional injustice exists in every state.

Shut Down the American Bar Association and all affiliates at every level of county, state and federal court.

Their RULE 1.6 enabled caused and perpetuated the injustice within the state government of every state and federally. Their Rule 1.6 permitted them to unconstitutionally and unlawfully intercept and interfere with the administration of justice in every court.

In Pennsylvania, the District Attorneys have been tightly organized minions of corruption and injustice. Resignations are appropriate.

At the state level, the judicial branch must promptly be restricted as demonstrated by the Constitution adopted by South Africa after the years of Apartheid where the courts silenced and retaliated against anyone who disagreed or spoke out or attempted to assert their rights: constitutional, civil, human or otherwise.

JUSTICE IS COMING...

I agree with Attorney General Kathleen Kane. She is central to resolution of this issue. She has witnessed the corruption, how deep it goes and how powerful it is. She has reason to be confident of re-election.

Kathleen Kane will restore JUSTICE to the entire state and start a wave of JUSTICE across the entire country.

Judicial Overthrow of Legislative and Executive - Rule 1.6

Alexander Hamilton described the separation of powers...

The Executive not only dispenses the honors, but holds the sword of the community.

The Legislative not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated.

The Judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither FORCE NOR WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments.

---

Hamilton neglected to see how each state judiciary enacting a law could undermine the whole of the government. By enacting a law which mandates the silence of lawyers, aggressively enforcing THEIR law, and undermining the legislature through it's lawyer membership and the executive through it's governor/lawyers. By enacting a law which undermines constitutional rights, and the law, without proper authority where it affects the rights protected by the Constitution of the United states and the state Constitutions.

The Judicial Branch has demonstrated their power to undermine the Constitution of the United States, because they alone have the authority to decide what is constitutional and ignore when they violate constitutional rights.

This is not speculation. This is why the constitution and the rule of law are ignored in the united States. And lately, the judiciary committee is trying to silence the whole country.

The mistake was letting the judiciary make their law without review of the collateral impact of the opportunity for denial of constitutional rights, and of equal protection of the law.

Rule 1.6 undermined the government and mandated the confidentiality of lawyers (the legislative) and law enforcement (the executive branch). As the judiciary has the power of judgment, they have effectively usurped force, will and judgment. One law controls them all, and mandates their silence.

Quietly rolled out to each state from 1984 through 2009... and modified ONLY when it exposed their judicial corruption - leaving bread crumbs demonstrating intent. Only a legislature could stop the power shift. A a mandate of confidentiality and the shame of what the government had allowed to happen has kept every legislature silent.

The judiciary controls judgment, force and will - and aggressively attacks any challenge to their unconstitutional, unlawful and unjust actions.

The government is controlled within one organization - the American Bar Association, and it's pretend government structure. An effective silent overthrow of the United States...

Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional and is so REPUGNANT TO THE CONSTITUTION. IT IS A NULLITY. IT IS VOID AB INITIO.

JUSTICE IS COMING.

Rule 1.6 - Occam's Razor

"Occam's Razor" is a principle which suggests that "all things being equal, the simplest answer is usually the right one."

Rule 1.6 is the simplest answer to the corruption and injustice in the United States and the nationwide indications that the United States Constitution is being ignored and people are losing their constitutional rights.

Rule 1.6 demonstrates it's fault and can be applied to EVERY story of injustice, judicial corruption, failure of law enforcement to act and deliberate acts of lawlessness within the law enforcement community.

Kids for Cash Sandusky @ Penn State The National Foreclosure Crisis The Injustice in Family Courts The Injustice in Criminal Courts Malicious Abuse of Power Under Color of Law

If you have a matter which defies explanation, write it in the COMMENTS section below. I can likely explain it by applying Rule 1.6

Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional, unethical, immoral, corrupting, and an unnecessary mandate within any system of justice.

Rule 1.6 has undermined the Judicial Branch of the United States government. The actions in the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 has demonstrated that the federal courts refuse to address their responsibility for the 'law' and have further engaged in an unconstitutional and fraudulent conspiracy to deliberately deny, obstruct and prevent the rights and privileges guaranteed by the United States Constitution.

THE BEAUTIFUL THING is that once Rule 1.6 removed, all the laws currently in place are good.

Justice restored.

All the reforms which failed because of the secret override enabled by Rule 1.6 begin to actually function. As it stands the reforms may have only been attempts by the corrupt to misdirect attention from their conspiracy to conceal their involvement and responsibility.

Senator Bob Casey's office

Senator Bob Casey Jr.'s office called after a meeting request was sent along with an explanation of the issue we wish to discuss.

Cathy called back on Friday and was making excuses in her message. Phone tag ensued.

When finally we connected, Cathy asked for an explanation of the issue. I gave her a verbal description of the issue we wished to discuss. It was quite clear she had NOT read the documents sent to Senator Casey.

Cathy kept trying to create an excuse to end the call. No matter how incorrect her thought was, Cathy persisted while I pointed out her failure to comprehend the issue.

Cathy indicated that the US Congress can do nothing. She was wrong.
I politely explained to her the US Constitution's Separation of Powers.

Cathy persisted in saying that no branch has interaction with the judiciary. She was wrong.

Cathy insisted that the Congress had no oversight of the Judiciary. She was wrong. We are not seeking oversight. She was battling a strawman logical fallacy.

Her next action was to feign insult because I told her any third grade civics student knows the separation of powers.

Cathy was insulted at being wrong. Cathy persisted in indicating that she knew better than me. Though, CATHY DOES NOT KNOW ME OR MY BACKGROUND AT ALL.

When I asked her background and experience, Cathy became more offended - and did not respond. Cathy indicated that the Senator has no jurisdiction to meet with us on this issue.

RIDICULOUS. Cathy was wrong.

Cathy hung up.

---

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6
requires the action of the United States Congress
to address a problem created by the Judicial Branch
which by its own authority
enacted a mandate for injustice
which sacrifices the judiciary's integrity and
prevents the court from lawful action to resolve the problem.

---

THE PROBLEM WITH CATHY...

Cathy started the conversation with her mind made up.

Cathy had indicated she doesn't know the issue.
- She asks for information about the issue. She is barely listening except when she is trying to interject a reason to hang up... BUT because she has not been paying attention, her excuses fail.

Cathy has asked for more information and it was provided.

Cathy incorrectly indicates that a US Senator and the US Congress have no interaction with the Judicial Branch, no Constitutional authority, and that Senator Casey has no jurisdiction to conduct a meeting on the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6.

CATHY IS WRONG and ABSOLUTELY COMMITTED TO BEING WRONG.

Instead of indicating a willingness to check her information, Cathy puts herself in a position of looking completely foolish.

Instead of accepting the responsibility, redirecting to a proper authority, or finding the correct information (even if just to challenge my information), Cathy places herself in a position of gatekeeper and hangs up the phone.

The litigation has been unending since 2007, I have been blocked by gatekeeper tactics before. They can hang up the phone. They take no responsibility. They may act like they know everything and nothing at the same time. They frequently act like it is their first day on the job. The flawed misinformation tactics prevents and denies and obstructs and stalls.

WHAT COULD BE THE MOTIVATION?
Who are the fans of injustice? ...the fans of the lack of integrity demonstrated by the United States Judiciary? ...the fans of judges who lose their integrity when they write fraudulent and twisted orders and opinions? ...the fans of corruption which goes unprosecuted? ...the fans of the power attained by undermining and usurping the authority of the judicial branch? ...the fans of a multiple decade conspiracy to deny and undermine the U.S. Constitution?

The membership of the American Bar Association is the only beneficiary from the injustice caused when their guideline set of 'trade rules' which were discretionary were enacted into law and became MANDATORY.

The ABA created an industry where their membership could thrive financially by charging litigants who could never expect to escape a deliberate mandatory injustice. Concealing the effect of the Rule under attorney client privilege and aggressively enforcing the Confidentiality of Information till death with its members, the ABA prevented its members from exposing their sedition as the organization usurped the authority of every state judiciary.

Cathy. YOU KNOW NOTHING.

The Constitutional Challenge did not arise out of malice. It grew out of necessity. It was presented and filed without accusations and blame. A responsible approach to an issue which required careful presentation to the entire country.

By taking the approach to the matter as a preemptory challenge to the Constitutionality of a state law, it removed the emotionally charged cases of the victims who simply wanted their constitutional rights to be restored in the state where they could then return for JUSTICE. Their cases became evidentiary support demonstrating the loss of constitutional rights.

This responsible approach was perceived as weakness or foolishness by the court. EVEN WITH THE ISSUE CLEARLY EXPOSED the court demonstrated the deliberate intent for the judiciary to continue in their injustice, to persist in the sedition, to abuse the authority of the court without regard for the US Constitution.

While failing to substantiate statements in fact or law or doctrine, the court continued to carelessly issue orders and opinions without regard for relevance or consistency. The law mandated that the judiciary sacrifice their integrity.

The Rule is clearly and deliberately unconstitutional. Yet, knowledgeable judges and lawyers, senators and representatives, and government officials continued to perpetuate the injustice.

The matter should have ended immediately with the judiciary accepting responsibility and indicating RULE 1.6 is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. However, the court actively participated in actions which ignored the law and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; undermining the default action by every state attorney general; removing the attorneys general from the matter; deliberate misrepresentations on the docket; refusing to allow the Attorneys General to indicate their default.

A LAW WHICH IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, IS A NULLITY. Informed and knowledgeable judges and lawyers are continuing to sacrifice their reputation and integrity based on a nullity. The delusion of the court's flawed and irrelevant opinions and "supporting" documents continued without any cognizance of reality or fact or law.

It is not necessary for the Supreme Court of the United States to disgrace themselves by ignoring the matter and denying certiori; or, by reviewing the matter and sacrificing integrity for the illusion of judicial integrity which has not existed in the United States since the 80's.

The litigants request the United States Congress address the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 and permit the Supreme Court of the United States to maintain an illusion of judicial integrity.

It is clearly a mistake to ignore or fail to comprehend the carefully thought out actions of the litigants. As survivors of the systematic injustice and extreme corruption, they discovered the unconstitutional 'law' and lawfully presented a workable resolution to the government.

It is in every American's best interest that Congress act at this time.

We demand the United States Constitution be respected honored and fully enforced by the Judiciary, the US Congress and the President.

---

---

CIVICS LESSON FOR CATHY

The Constitution is the Supreme Law of the United States.



Senator Casey is a member of the United States Senate.

The United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives form the Legislative Branch of the United States Government.

The Legislative branch makes the law and has the power to initiate constitutional amendments.

First, the Legislative branch makes the law.
Second, the Executive branch executes the law.
Last, the Judicial branch interprets the law.
Each branch has an effect on the other.

Legislative Branch

Checks on the Executive

- Impeachment power (House) - Trial of impeachments (Senate) - Selection of the President (House) and Vice President (Senate) in the case of no majority of electoral votes - May override Presidential vetoes - Senate approves departmental appointments - Senate approves treaties and ambassadors - Approval of replacement Vice President - Power to declare war - Power to enact taxes and allocate funds - President must, from time-to-time, deliver a State of the Union address

Checks on the Judiciary

-Senate approves federal judges -Impeachment power (House) -Trial of impeachments (Senate) -Power to initiate constitutional amendments -Power to set courts inferior to the Supreme Court -Power to set jurisdiction of courts -Power to alter the size of the Supreme Court

Checks on the Legislature - because it is bicameral, the Legislative branch has a degree of self-checking.

- Bills must be passed by both houses of Congress - House must originate revenue bills - Neither house may adjourn for more than three days without the consent of the other house - All journals are to be published

Executive Branch

Checks on the Legislature

- Veto power - Vice President is President of the Senate - Commander in chief of the military - Recess appointments - Emergency calling into session of one or both houses of Congress - May force adjournment when both houses cannot agree on adjournment - Compensation cannot be diminished

Checks on the Judiciary

- Power to appoint judges - Pardon power

Checks on the Executive

- Vice President and Cabinet can vote that the President is unable to discharge his duties

Judicial Branch

Checks on the Legislature

- Judicial review - Seats are held on good behavior - Compensation cannot be diminished

Checks on the Executive

- Judicial review - Chief Justice sits as President of the Senate during presidential impeachment

On to SCOTUS & the US Congress

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has demonstrated their tactics which while preventing the matter from going before any judges rules without any court appearances AND affirms that ruling by every judge in the Third Circuit.

The thing is that no judge signs anything in the Third Circuit. Yet, one must play along to the point of foolishness pretending.

- even when the attorneys general have indicated they were told not to participate.
- even though no order is ever signed
- even though the clerk of courts never provides the briefs to the judges
- even though the US Marshalls are watching the case
- even though the rulings are not based on facts (there's been no hearings so everything has to be on the paper.)
- even though the technology demonstrates the clerk of courts misdirection

The evidence that the matter never went before any judge for review is clear. The fact that they think people are stupid and that the court persists in this disrespect is aggravating.

What's wrong with these people? So afraid of facts? So afraid of justice? So afraid that they cannot substantiate their decisions based on the facts of the case THAT THEY MAKE UP STUFF and rule based on that.

The incomprehensible injustice of the American Court system.

Pray you never learn this fact first-hand.

So the matetr is off to SCOTUS, BUT with the knowledge that SCOTUS would never acknowledge that the United States Judiciary has been undermined by the American Bar Association in every state and given the full power to attack and destroy it's critics.

Remember how many years Nelson mandela spent in prison. It was the South African Courts whichn put him in jail. It was the South African Courts which jailed it's critics.

It is the South African Constitution that saw to it that the Judicial Branch of their Government would not have that power to undermine justice in South Africa ever again.

The Tooth Fairy, Santa Claus, and Justice.

The Tooth Fairy, Santa Claus, and Justice.
- Things you believed in because you trusted the teller.
- The truth moved you to the other side where you continued the stories.
- Among 'friends', you could talk about the truth.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 - if you thought finding the truth about the Tooth Fairy and Santa Claus was difficult... wait until you find out what the American Bar Association has done.

Undermining justice in the United States by enacting a law which violates your constitutional rights, the Supreme Court in each state acted on the recommendation of the American Bar Association.

They created a situation which they could not lawfully undo. They conspired to conceal it. They mandated it be concealed without regard for life, liberty or justice.

They manipulated the population to believe that the problem was in bias, god, sexism, racism, prejudice, hate, ignorance, ... All of the ridiculous things which the media blows out of proportion in the United States. Yes, those issues do exist BUT NOT AT THE LEVELS THE MEDIA IS PORTRAYING IT.

It is necessary for you to believe in those reasons for the problem. Once you do, you stop looking for a resolution. You just point at the problem. The unresolvable problems which except for a few hateful groups are not as pervasive as the media would have you believe.

All of those things help to conceal and misdirect from a bigger issue. INJUSTICE - deliberately caused by lawyers and judges who mandate that they not take any action to reveal it lest they face disciplinary action.

The members of the American Bar Association need you to believe in all of the things which distract you from their epic failure. So that is where they point when injustice occurs. They POINT at other problems to distract you.

You must believe in justice - even though there are SO many problems with it.
The People believe in justice.
Lawyers and Judges are like the parents that told you about the Tooth Fairy and Santa Clause, lawyers and judges also know the truth
People go to court and expect justice. Lawyers and judges know better, but can't lawfully tell you.

Lawyers and Judges know that they are MANDATED to ignore injustice and judicial corruption where it will adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary, negatively affect the reputation of lawyers, self-incriminate, or affect their client.

Lawyers and Judges know to refer to Rule 1.6 as Attorney-Client Privilege (ACP). But that's a lie.

Rule 1.6 is called CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION.

Same number. RULE 1.6
Same title. CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION
Every state. Rolled out gradually from a 'trade code' to a LAW.
(The only way that could happen is if they had the same author... the American Bar Association.)
When Rule 1.6 was a trade code, it was a suggestion. As LAW, it is a MANDATE which must be followed by lawyers, District Attorneys, Attorneys General,...

Any effort to expose the conspiracy became ILLEGAL.
Any effort to expose the conspiracy was considered sedition because it would expose their sedition.

When Rule 1.6 became 'law', the ethical and moral problems with the code had been documented. THEY KNEW.
When rule 1.6 became 'law', no lawyer or judge could lawfully address the unconstitutionality of the 'law'.
When Rule 1.6 became 'law', a lawyer and judge could trigger injustice which would be unescapable for the litigant... the only possible outcome is loss of everything, prison, or suicide.
When Rule 1.6 became 'law'', the victim litigant lost their rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution... and because those who were sworn to protect those rights were the ones responsible for the 'law, there was nothing anyone could do to end the injustice.

Rule 1.6 is NOT law. Repugnant to the US Constitution, Rule 1.6 is a nullity. The conspiracy to deny and obstruct justice in the United States Courts is a conspiracy of epic national proportions. Documented in the law books and court records. The evidence of the conspiracy is there.

The evidence of the conspiracy to conceal the sedition is documented in the 'bread crumbs' left by efforts to maintain the conspiracy. Each time Rule 1.6 was edited in each state, it was done to conceal and prevent exposure of the injustice and corruption of the Judicial Branch.

Those who may tell you otherwise,... we all believed in the Tooth Fairy and Santa... until the truth was told.

JUSTICE IS COMING.

Rule 1.6 undermined the United States Constitution. They broke the Judicial Branch and destroyed their integrity. The time has come for the American People to restore the US Constitution, the Rule of Law, and the integrity of the Judiciary.

Distance between two points

The view from the door of the Superior Court Of Pennsylvania.

There are just a few steps from where your rights and liberties were guaranteed to where they are denied, ignored and prevented.

The Judicial Branch of the American government has been overthrown by the American Bar Association. An act of sedition in every state. This is why justice is not available to the people.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 seeks to restore the rights of the people and the integrity of the judiciary.

Just a few steps from where a revolution began.

"Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security." - the Declaration of Independence