Rule 1.6 trumps EVERYTHING

Rule 1.6 trumps everything, ethics, morality, law, common sense, constitutional rights. The mandate for non-disclosure controls ALL LEGAL PROFESSIONALS while preventing justice and undermining the authority of the courts and government officials.

In the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, ONLY the Legislature has authority to suspend a law. While Rule 1.6 was improperly enacted by the state Supreme Court and is unconstitutional, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is not permitted to expose or undo their actions pursuant to Rule 1.6.

In this interview with CNN, Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane can ONLY be not-talking about Rule 1.6.

Are you investigating this right now?

We are not investigating. I cannot investigate.

I am being stopped from performing my duties as Attorney General.

My office is being stopped from certain investigations.

And we are being stopped even from telling why.

So I am hearing you say that your hands are tied. Why are your hands tied?

My hands are tied and this will be frustrating for you because it is just as frustrating for me.

My hands are ties because there are court orders which don't allow us to say certain things which I believe the public needs to know.

As the state's top prosecutor, you are saying that there is a court order that's keeping you from investigating a case that you think and the Chief Justice on the state Supreme court thinks might be illegal.

That is correct.

Do you feel that the system is being abused to protect certain people?

I knew that I was walking into public corruption. Which again is why I ran.

But I will tell you this. Even I am shocked at the level of public corruption.

I am shocked at how deep it goes.

I am shocked at how powerful it is.

I have never seen anything like this. It's breathtaking.

It has been described by the people familiar with what is happening as shameful.

---

Rule 1.6 conceals corruption, like Cash for Kids and the Nationwide Foreclosure Crisis, fale imprisonment, and judicial corruption and injustice.

Rule 1.6 affects every level of state and federal courts, undermining the independence of the judiciary where they are mandated to conceal corruption and injustice.

Rule 1.6 has undermined the judiciary and usurped their authority. The judiciary is held hostage by bar associations which are positioned to interfere between the people and the judiciary intefering with the administration of the courts, obstructing justice, and numerous other federal crimes and constitutional offenses.

It's been concealing injustice in the US since 1984.

Judicial Independence a necessity for Jurisdiction

The judicial branch was established in the U.S. Constitution as a co-equal third branch of our government.

The primary purposes of the judicial branch are to solve disputes by making fair and impartial decisions based upon facts, uphold the rule of law, and protect our rights.

"Judicial independence does not just happen all by itself. It is tremendously hard to create, and easier than most people imagine to destroy." Justice Sandra Day O'Connor The National Voter February 2008

Rule 1.6 - CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION causes a loss of constitutional rights to a litigant where there has been acts of judicial misconduct, corruption and injustice. Once that occurs any attempt to address the loss of rights is ignored by the courts. Rule 1.6 was enacted into law by the state supreme courts and rolled out during a period which started in 1984 (New Jersey) and continued through 2009 (Maine).

Kids for Cash - injustice ignored
Foreclosure Crisis Nationwide - based on fraudulent documents
Injustice in the Family Courts - Suicides, Homelessness, ...
Child Trafficking - What the Sandusky Report kept confidential
etc....


A Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 was filed in August 2013. The federal courts improperly dismissed the matter after 56 state attorneys general had defaulted. Rule 1.6 injustice continues. The Constitutional Challenge will next be submitted to the US Supreme Court and the US Congress.

---

Since the founding of our nation, a system of checks and balances has ensured that each branch of government can function effectively, but cannot overpower the other branches. The main check that the judicial branch has on the other two branches is the power to declare executive or legislative acts unconstitutional.

There is no authority outside of the judiciary for declaring acts unconstitutional.

The judiciary has the authority for writing the laws to conduct the business of the judicial branch.

Judicial authority to self-legislate is limited only in that it can not infringe upon constitutional rights secured by state constitutions and the Constitution of the United States of America.

THE PROBLEM:
Where the judiciary, acting within their self-legislative authority, enacts a law which is unconstitutional, there is no authority to review the 'law'.

- Their law violates the US Constitution.
- Their law violates the federal authority to self-legislate.
- Their law violates state constitutions.
- Their law violates the state authority to self-legislate.
- There is no preliminary review.
- No checks and balances.

THE ANSWER: THE JUDICIARY IS NOT AUTHORIZED TO VIOLATE PEOPLE'S RIGHTS. BUT, THEY DID.

The 'LAW' was written by the American Bar Association whose membership is mandated to silence and profits from the unconstitutional law. Prior to being enacted confidentiality was discretionary, as a 'law' IT IS A MANDATE WHICH IS AGGRESSIVELY ENFORCED.

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE JUDICIARY ENACTS A LAW WHICH VIOLATES CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS?

1. They ignore it.
2. They conceal it.
3. They retaliate.
4. They conspire on appeal.
5. They deny the facts, the law, and rights.
6. They prevent judicial review.
7. They lose judicial independence.
8. They sacrifice integrity.

WHERE THAT LAW MANDATES THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF LAWYERS
9. They undermine impartiality.
10. They undermine the facts.
11. They undermine the rule of law.
12. They undermine people's rights.

They undermine judicial independence.

The judiciary, upon proper petition to address the unconstitutional aspects of ONE law enacted by EVERY state supreme court, has prevented any review by ignoring the facts, not applying the rule of law, and undermining people's rights.

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN EVERY STATE JUDICIARY ENACTS A LAW WHICH VIOLATES CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS?
INESCAPABLE INJUSTICE.
JUDICIAL CORRUPTION.
CONSTITUTION RIGHTS IGNORED.
FEDERAL COURTS IMPROPERLY DISMISS CHALLENGE.

Judicial independence is an essential element of jurisdiction. Where the court lacks jurisdiction, they lack authority to issue any ruling, order or opinion in the matter. Their actions are void ab initio and have no validity.

Where the courts refuse to address their lack of lawful authority and corruption, the victim is subject to retaliation and continued terror while denied any opportunity to address the loss of constitutional rights.

Injustice does not end injustice. It extends it.

Rule 1.6 - Occam's Razor

"Occam's Razor" is a principle which suggests that "all things being equal, the simplest answer is usually the right one."

Rule 1.6 is the simplest answer to the corruption and injustice in the United States and the nationwide indications that the United States Constitution is being ignored and people are losing their constitutional rights.

Rule 1.6 demonstrates it's fault and can be applied to EVERY story of injustice, judicial corruption, failure of law enforcement to act and deliberate acts of lawlessness within the law enforcement community.

Kids for Cash Sandusky @ Penn State The National Foreclosure Crisis The Injustice in Family Courts The Injustice in Criminal Courts Malicious Abuse of Power Under Color of Law

If you have a matter which defies explanation, write it in the COMMENTS section below. I can likely explain it by applying Rule 1.6

Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional, unethical, immoral, corrupting, and an unnecessary mandate within any system of justice.

Rule 1.6 has undermined the Judicial Branch of the United States government. The actions in the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 has demonstrated that the federal courts refuse to address their responsibility for the 'law' and have further engaged in an unconstitutional and fraudulent conspiracy to deliberately deny, obstruct and prevent the rights and privileges guaranteed by the United States Constitution.

THE BEAUTIFUL THING is that once Rule 1.6 removed, all the laws currently in place are good.

Justice restored.

All the reforms which failed because of the secret override enabled by Rule 1.6 begin to actually function. As it stands the reforms may have only been attempts by the corrupt to misdirect attention from their conspiracy to conceal their involvement and responsibility.

Rule 1.6 Rollout and the rise in Judicial Complaints

The graph demonstrates the dramatic increase in judicial complaints as Rule 1.6 was enacted in each state. Most complaints are dismissed without review or investigation.

Ronald Reagan Years (enacted in 30 states/jurisdictions)
1984 - New Jersey, Arizona
1985 - Minnesota, Montana, Washington, Missouri, Delaware, North Carolina, Arkansas
1986 - New Hampshire, Nevada, Maryland, Connecticut, New Mexico, Florida, Idaho, Wyoming, Indiana, Louisiana
1987 - Mississippi, Utah, North Dakota, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, South Dakota
1988 - Kansas, Oklahoma, Michigan, West Virginia, Rhode Island

George H.W. Bush Years (enacted in 8 states/jurisdictions)
1989 - Kentucky, Texas
1990 - South Carolina, Illinois, District of Columbia, Alabama
1991 - Virgin Islands
1992 - Colorado

Bill Clinton Years (enacted in 6 states/jurisdictions)
1993 - Alaska, Hawaii
1994
1995
1996
1997 - Massachusetts
1998
1999 - Virginia, Vermont
2000 - Georgia

George W. Bush Years * (Enacted in 6 states/jurisdictions)
2001
2002 - Tennessee
2003
2004
2005 - Oregon, Iowa, Nebraska
2006 - Ohio
2007
2008 - New York

Barack Obama Years (Enacted in 1 state/jurisdiction)
2009 - Maine


* It is within the realm of possibility that the involvement of the US Supreme Court in the Presidential Election was leveraged using Rule 1.6. The US Supreme Court could have been instructed to give the election to George W. Bush, or face charges of sedition and treason based on Rule 1.6.

That sedition would demonstrate how Rule 1.6 undermined the judiciary in every state which had enacted Rule 1.6. The revelation that the United States Courts had undermined the constitutionally protected rights of the people AND IGNORED THE INJUSTICE could cause civil unrest throughout the country.

The US Supreme Court caves to the pressure giving George W. Bush the presidency. Al Gore quietly accepts their ruling for the sake of the entire country. Tennessee is the next state to enact Rule 1.6 into law - this would mandate Al Gore's silence.

The Foreclosure Crisis in the US which became a national issue during the Bush years is demonstrative of Rule 1.6 undermining the rights of the people by the Courts with the mandate of confidentiality of lawyers and judges assured by the law.

About those civil rights and liberties... America, you better sit down for this.

Americans have been misdirected and misinformed as they lost their civil rights and liberties.

The government made a huge mistake that they could not get themselves out of.

First, because they made it illegal for lawyers to fix it.

Second, because they are fearful of what the American public will do when they learn the truth.

They would rather ignore and continue the injustice than ever face the truth.

---

I am of the opinion that the US has been preparing for a huge failure - the stories are more frequent and more and more credible and clearly documented. The injustice in the USA has been growing and there has been no lawful and legal way to address it. The rights and liberties granted by the Constitution are being denied and ignored. Individuals, families and entire communities are affected.

The lawmakers are not lawfully permitted to act.
The lawyers are not lawfully permitted to act.
The judges are not lawfully permitted to act.
The government recognizes the failure across the nation and takes no action because it is unlawful to do so, AND ALSO they have not wanted the people to learn what happened.

The Govt never imagined two non-lawyer pro se litigants would find the cause of the injustice and be in a lawful and legal position with standing to address the constitutional crisis.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 lawfully permits Constitutionally protected rights and liberties to be restored to all people. One law in every state prevented the fix. It is called CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION.

When the sedition in every state and the injustice deliberately caused by the American Bar Association, and the conspiracy which MANDATED the participation by all lawyers in the US is acknowledged, the people of the USA will have to demonstrate extreme restraint in controlling their response.

The federal government stood back and permitted the descent into incredible injustice to occur. The Govt succumbed to the belief that there was no lawful way to address the problem and it grew worse, Kids for Cash, Family Court, the Foreclosure Crisis nationwide.

The DOJ has begun restoring rights and liberties, they are paying attention... they are arresting judges in several states now AT THE STATE LEVEL. The Sheriffs are regaining their power and purpose.

Fear of the public's retaliation for the last 30 years of deliberate corruption and injustice in the US has caused actions by the government which defy explanation and are ignored as conspiracy theories.

A lawful approach has been filed in Federal Court. August 8, 2013 #13-4614 United States District Court - Philadelphia. Currently in Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

JUSTICE IS COMING.
ANARCHY HAS BEEN AVOIDED.

THE RESTORATION OF THE US CONSTITUTION WILL OCCUR, BUT NOT WITHOUT THE PEOPLE LEARNING WHAT HAPPENED.