The victim of Rule 1.6 injustice will discover a new group when the matter escalates up to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
The CENTRAL LEGAL STAFF is a group positioned between the litigant and the judiciary. This provides the opportunity for a new kind of corruption - intercept, misdirect and 'play judge'.
When they play judge, they are acting like the absent-minded professor of judges. The level of carelessness is clearly visible.
To maintain confidentiality, Rule 1.6 permits fraud to conceal prior fraud and the Central Legal Staff demonstrate such an extreme disrespect for the facts, the truth and the law that there is no denying the deception - this is not the work of a judge who has been on the bench for years.
PER CURIAM orders are only permitted in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania for 'housekeeping' types of issues.
Even when utilized for housekeeping or general scheduling, the Per Curiam Order will include the reference to the relevant Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure.
You file a Motion seeking the decision of the Superior Court regarding issues relative to the Appeal;
and receive a Per Curiam order dismissing or denying that motion,
one sentence,
with no further information,
with no reference to an applicable Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure,
which shows no indication of any review by any judge,
with no signature of a judge,
which ignores every issue in the motion,
without any explanation.
WHY DO THEY THINK THAT YOU ARE SO STUPID THAT YOU WILL NOT NOTICE?
(It is at times like this that my faith in humanity falters.)
It is hard to believe that so many people are working against you. They do not know you. You did not cause the lack of jurisdiction. Every time they fuck up, you lose more. And the system comes down harder on you.
A review of the Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Law relating to the business operation of the Superior Court fails to show any allowance for a Per Curiam order unless the issue is purely for scheduling or ‘housekeeping.’
Clearly, the motion did not go to any motions judge for review. The Central Legal Staff intercepted and disposed of your motion.
Pursuant to Rule 1.6, the Central Legal Staff may participate in fraudulent actions intended to prevent disclosure which could adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary, the Central Legal Staff office, coworkers and themselves.
The Central Legal Staff is not protecting the integrity of the judiciary, by intercepting the document. If they wanted to protect the integrity of the judge, they would make sure the judge had jurisdiction. And every effort is contrary to that task.
At best, the Central Legal Staff is preventing the judge from direct involvement in the action
- by obstructing justice,
- interfering with the administration of the courts,
- denying constitutional rights,
- participating in a conspiracy
- causing continued fraud against the victim,
- Rule 1.6 has usurped the Rule of Law and rights protected by the US Constitution.
The Central Legal Staff are members of the American Bar Association, the Philadelphia Bar Association, and other affiliated organizations.
The Central Legal Staff are compensated for presenting Continuing Legal Education (CLE) programs for the ABA and it’s various affiliated organizations.
THE CENTRAL LEGAL STAFF IS POSITIONED TO INTERCEPT...
Where every document must go through the CLS;
the issue has been neglected;
the decision fails to indicate any direct action or review by any judge;
the Motion was not vexatious or frivilous;
Rule 1.6 permits efforts by legal professionals which prevent disclosure of fraud;
an initial action or order lacked jurisdiction and represented a fraud;
CLS members are legal professionals and member of the various Bar Associations and affiliates;
CLS Members are compensated for presenting seminars for the Bar Associations;
When you asked for a signed copy of the document, YOU WERE DENIED.
When requesting the signed document, the clerks responses suggested you were paranoid or crazy;
When you petitioned the court for the signed document, it was ignored.
You have had to sign every copy of every document along with it’s verification and certificate of service.
It's not paranoia. It is a rape of the public trust.
Santa, the Easter Bunny, the Tooth Fairy were things which your parents convinced you to believe in which you later found out did not exist. The hopeful litigant had persevered undaunted while experiencing and documenting egregious and inescapable injustice persevering that every level of the courts may not have been undermined and usurped by Rule 1.6.
But, it happened.
Showing posts with label CURIAM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CURIAM. Show all posts
Tuesday, November 4, 2014
Tuesday, July 15, 2014
Per Curiam - Ignore, Threaten & Terrorize
The irresponsibility of the Per Curiam Order is used when the courts seek to prevent the exposure of their corruption.
It requires more paperwork. Which they will further Per Curiam as there is no judge around who wished to sign an obviously corrupt order without any review of the matter.
It requires more paperwork. Ask about the Rule of Law, expect it to be DENIED PER CURIAM.
It requires more paperwork. Ask about the fact that the Motion was UNCONTESTED, expect it to be DENIED PER CURIAM.
It requires more paperwork. Their review was not discretionary, but mandatory. It was in the petition, but they likely never read it.
It requires more paperwork. Ask about an interlocutory appeal of that decision, expect it to be DENIED PER CURIAM.
AND it is almost an exact duplicate of a Motion to Strike in another case... where there can be no contest as no contrary information was presented during the hearing.
All the while, you provide reams of paper, a destitute person, homeless, below poverty level for years, begging from people for support and help, and the COURT WILL IGNORE PER CURIAM.
YOU WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO SURVIVE THIS LONG.
YOU WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO PERSEVERE.
YOU WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO FIND THE SOURCE OF THEIR CORRUPTION.
YOU WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO MEET THEIR DEADLINES.
You WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO KNOW THE LAW, RULES,etc WHICH ONLY APPLY TO YOUR DETRIMENT.
YOU LEFT THEM NOTHING BY WHICH YOU CAN BE FURTHER DENIED YOUR RIGHTS...
...SO THEY HAVE DENIED YOUR RIGHTS BASED ON NOTHING.
There is a reason they require you to exhaust any effort for resolution within the state before you may file in federal court. Exhaustion is another method - their coercion towards your suicide.
And the Court is too ashamed to even sign it, or date it, or explain what they can't...
... because Rule 1.6 Confidentiality mandates they say nothing as they ignore the Constitution, the law, the procedures, your civil rights, and your human rights without mercy.
And the one Rule that the Courts all follow... Rule 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION.
(BTW, it was not filed even on the date indicated. I was there. The 'mistakes' are endless.)
Every decision since the Constitutional Challenge was filed in August 2013 has been a Per Curiam order, unsigned and undated. No signatures. No dated. Per Curiam. Indecisions. Terror.
Corruption and Confidentiality for the purpose of denying Life, Liberty, and Justice.
Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio, Judge & President of the Bar Association & former US Attorneys Office employee, was NOT acting within any law which permitted her to issue the order. If she was lawful, they would indicate the law and be done. They don't.
Instead, since May 2011, I am terrorized by a deliberate and intentionally defective and void order which cannot be addressed in any court because the malice it has caused attackes opn a daily basis and has tainted every county agency, every level of law enforcement, while the world watches every level of the courts corrupted and demonstrating their silence mandated by Rule 1.6... while the terror continues.
It requires more paperwork. Which they will further Per Curiam as there is no judge around who wished to sign an obviously corrupt order without any review of the matter.
It requires more paperwork. Ask about the Rule of Law, expect it to be DENIED PER CURIAM.
It requires more paperwork. Ask about the fact that the Motion was UNCONTESTED, expect it to be DENIED PER CURIAM.
It requires more paperwork. Their review was not discretionary, but mandatory. It was in the petition, but they likely never read it.
It requires more paperwork. Ask about an interlocutory appeal of that decision, expect it to be DENIED PER CURIAM.
AND it is almost an exact duplicate of a Motion to Strike in another case... where there can be no contest as no contrary information was presented during the hearing.
All the while, you provide reams of paper, a destitute person, homeless, below poverty level for years, begging from people for support and help, and the COURT WILL IGNORE PER CURIAM.
YOU WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO SURVIVE THIS LONG.
YOU WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO PERSEVERE.
YOU WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO FIND THE SOURCE OF THEIR CORRUPTION.
YOU WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO MEET THEIR DEADLINES.
You WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO KNOW THE LAW, RULES,etc WHICH ONLY APPLY TO YOUR DETRIMENT.
YOU LEFT THEM NOTHING BY WHICH YOU CAN BE FURTHER DENIED YOUR RIGHTS...
...SO THEY HAVE DENIED YOUR RIGHTS BASED ON NOTHING.
There is a reason they require you to exhaust any effort for resolution within the state before you may file in federal court. Exhaustion is another method - their coercion towards your suicide.
And the Court is too ashamed to even sign it, or date it, or explain what they can't...
... because Rule 1.6 Confidentiality mandates they say nothing as they ignore the Constitution, the law, the procedures, your civil rights, and your human rights without mercy.
And the one Rule that the Courts all follow... Rule 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION.
(BTW, it was not filed even on the date indicated. I was there. The 'mistakes' are endless.)Every decision since the Constitutional Challenge was filed in August 2013 has been a Per Curiam order, unsigned and undated. No signatures. No dated. Per Curiam. Indecisions. Terror.
Corruption and Confidentiality for the purpose of denying Life, Liberty, and Justice.
Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio, Judge & President of the Bar Association & former US Attorneys Office employee, was NOT acting within any law which permitted her to issue the order. If she was lawful, they would indicate the law and be done. They don't.
Instead, since May 2011, I am terrorized by a deliberate and intentionally defective and void order which cannot be addressed in any court because the malice it has caused attackes opn a daily basis and has tainted every county agency, every level of law enforcement, while the world watches every level of the courts corrupted and demonstrating their silence mandated by Rule 1.6... while the terror continues.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)