Motion for Corrections to the Docket

Filed in Superior Court - PDF version
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA

Terance Healy	:
(Appellant)	: # 900 EDA 2014
	:
v.	:
	:
David Miller Jennifer K. Miller	:
(Appellee)	:

MOTION FOR CORRECTIONS TO THE DOCKET

ISSUE #1
The Docket in this matter incorrectly indicates that the Appellant Brief was filed on September 3, 2014, where the brief had been filed on September 2, 2014.

Copy of Time Stamped First page attached.

Appellant requests the correction of the Docket.


ISSUE #2
The Docket in this matter incorrectly indicates that on October 7, 2014 “Reproduced Record Filed Late”

Copy of Docket attached.

Where there is no requirement for a Pro Se In Forma Pauperis to file any Reproduced Record indicated within the Rules of Appeallate Procedure, nor is any time requirement indicated, Appellant respectfully requests the correction of the docket to more correctly indicate “Reproduced Record Filed”

Respectfully,
Terance Healy

ARTICLE III REQUIREMENTS ARE MET

A case or controversy between the plaintiffs and the defendant is properly placed before the court.

(1) an “injury in fact”;

The Court acknowledged the Plaintiffs injury in the Memorandum of the Court dated October 29, 2013.
“[Plaintiffs] assert, inter alia, that Rule 1.6 denies a Pro Se litigant of an opportunity to petition the government for redress of grievances, denies a Pro Se litigant of life, liberty and or property without due process of law; causes a denial of constitutionally protected rights by the State and as such is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.”

(2) a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of – the injury had to be fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant, and not the result of the independent action of some third party not before the court.

From Appellee Breif page 14.
“Attorney General Kathleen Kane has never has anything to do with Healy or Krautheim themselves, or with their previous litigation efforts (in which they allegedly were injured)”

Attorney General Kane acknowledges the failure to take any action to address the injuries to the Plaintiffs, to investigate the extensive reports of the judicial misconduct and corruption, and the damage caused to the plaintiffs because of the failure of the Attorney General to enforce the laws of the commonwealth.

The Pennsylvania Attorney General is the chief law enforcement officer of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The office has the responsibility for the prosecution of crime prosecuted by the commonwealth, including organized crime, public corruption, and consumer protection. The Attorney General represents the commonwealth in all actions brought by or against the commonwealth, reviews all proposed rules and regulations by commonwealth agencies.


The failure of the Attorney General to enforce the laws of the commonwealth, and also the Attorney General's failure to follow the law, directly caused the resultant injury to the plaintiffs.

The Attorney General's inaction in the matter further causes the inescapable injustice to the plaintiffs which continued for years.

Once an act of misconduct occurred within a courtroom, the failure of the Attorney General to enforce the law and to address the injustice and resultant public corruption sacrificed the integrity of the judiciary and caused the plaintiffs situation to worsen without any possibility for resolution.

(3) A showing that it 'be likely, as opposed to merely speculative that the injury will be redressed by a favorable outcome.

A ruling that Rule 1.6 is UNCONSTITUTIONAL resolves the matter for the plaintiffs and returns them to the state with their previously denied rights and liberties available with equal protection under the law.

A ruling that Rule 1.6 is UNCONSTITUTIONAL permits the Attorney General to perform the law enforcement responsibilities required of the office of Attorney General.

A ruling that Rule 1.6 is UNCONSTITUTIONAL permits the judiciary to acknowledge address and resolve matters before their courts without a mandate to ignore and deny injustice, judicial misconduct and public corruption.

A ruling that Rule 1.6 is UNCONSTITUTIONAL permits the legislature to resume responsible management of the laws of the commonwealth

---

RETURN TO REPLY BRIEF INDEX

Separation of Powers

The Judiciary is not constitutionally or lawfully permitted to write, make or enact law.

SO HOW DID THE 1987 SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA GET AWAY WITH IT?

Can someone in the Pennsylvania legislature please explain how the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania enacted a law?
Title 204 Chapter 81?

...and how THAT law prevented the legislature from changing the law?
Title 204 Chapter 81?

...and how THAT law also prevents the executive branch from enforcing the law?
Title 204 Chapter 81?

And NOW inform the USA how it happened in every state?
It seems the State Supreme Courts have some 'splaining to do.

Because the courts acted without authority and in violation of the State and Federal Constitutions... and the resulting injustice in undeniable... and the criminal misconduct and corruption were BEYOND LAWFUL PROSECUTION??? Protected and concealed by an illegal, unlawful, improperly enacted and executed law, which they failed to enforce.

EVIL IS NOT ILLEGAL. But it seems the State Supreme Court made it lawful. And who could declare it unlawful, but themselves. And who could expose the unlawfulness, when lawyers were not lawfully permitted to act? A couple of Pro Se litigants terrorized to the point of extinction.

IT'S CALLED UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTIONS. and THAT'S NOT VALID.

Now who is gonna back up the Pro Se litigants that have lawfully filed this Challenge in Federal Courts?

And who is going to arrest the 1987 Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, and the Governor and Attorney General?

The nightmare of unconstitutional unprosecuted malicious and deliberate injustice and abuse of power under color of law is ending in the USA because it was always unconstitutional... and now it is clear why, when, where, who and how it happened.

NOW that it is exposed as unconstitutional. Lawyers may step up and assist without fear of disbarment for failing to follow Rule 1.6. Step Right UP! EXPOSE THE INJUSTICE.

Please, Read The Document.

No one is reading the Document. OMG ROFL.

Of course not. Pro Se litigants are too beat up to bother. Lawyers and judges have been trained to ignore the Pro Se litigant. All are resigned to their facts of the situation. They can't imagine the resolution.

Yesterday, when a copy was properly filed and hand-delivered to Bucks County Court Administration, A request was made to have the document provided to a judge promptly. It's their emergency process. The receptionist asked if I was a lawyer. I replied that I was not a lawyer, and I was certain the judge in the matter would be interested. She threw the paperwork on her desk and walked away. She ignored and dismissed me completely.

Rude. Disrepectful. Reaffirming my purpose.

Blocked by a Gatekeeper. She was not a lawyer. She had been trained to treat Pro Se litigants like they had no rights - because they HAVE lost their rights. That's unconstitutional! She had no idea that the document she threw on her desk would affect all peoples rights.

---

On Kitchen Nightmares, Gordon Ramsey tries to help restaurant owners/chefs who immediately respond to his suggestions by ignoring him, running away, hiding and crying. Only when they sit and listen do they realize he has their problem solved.

BLOODY HELL!!!
SOMEONE READ THE DOCUMENT!!!

---

Kathleen Kane, Eric Holder and JB Van Hollen probably haven't read it either. Someone be ready, when they do.

I had no idea that this was where things were leading. The Resolution is clear. The time has come to stop pointing to the problems and begin pointing towards the resolution. I have left my experience on the web site as it is necessary to understand how I got here. I challenge anyone to point to any injustice which when investigated doesn't pivot on an act of misconduct.

"Will you be ready when it comes. Oh, When it comes." ~Walela

---

For Openers...

TERANCE HEALY and TODD M. KRAUTHEIM in the name of THE UNITED STATES file this pleading against KATHLEEN KANE, Pennsylvania Attorney General and the ATTORNEYS GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES challenging the constitutionality of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

Plaintiffs seek to restore the constitutional rights of Pro Se litigants while restoring the integrity and reputation of the judiciary and the legal profession and deliver to the legislature the ability to perform the duties of their position to responsibly manage the law.

Plaintiffs additionally offer that they are in the extremely unique position to be acting lawfully with proper standing while having a valid causes for relief in the proper forum for the rule to be addressed.

Yes, we've got standing AND a cause for relief AND a venue.
Evidence in Family Court, Civil Court and Criminal Court.

American Bar Association...
I AM COMING. I WANT MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
I WANT THEM NOW.

So Far So Good...

It seems that everything is now aligned to resolve the Pro Se loss of rights in America.

To the other victims like myself. Don't be angry. There is reason to believe that those who knew about it were as frustrated at their inability to fix it, or have it fixed. No one would continue to ignore the abuses in the system unless it was mandated by law.

It wasn't until I decided to fix it myself that I fully recognized that IT HAD BECOME ILLEGAL FOR OUR STATE GOVERNMENT TO TAKE ANY ACTION TO RESTORE OUR RIGHTS, OR TAKE ANY ACTION LEADING TO OUR RIGHTS BEING RETURNED.

That my mother's house was not surrounded by law enforcement after my messages to the Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane, Governor Tom Corbett and US Attorney General Eric Holder indicates to me that they are prepared to address what happens next. There were no call backs... of course, they couldn't. The law prevents it.

The law which has prevented Pro Se litigants from being heard in the courts will have the reverse effect tomorrow. The representatives of the States will be unable to take any action and unable to be heard in court. The law prevents them from taking action. I am certain that the Attorneys General are in favor of the restoration of the rights of the people, while they may not legally indicate that intention. Their mandated silence may permit the immediate resolution of the matter by the Federal Court.

My efforts will permit the Attorneys General to take actions necessary to restore honor and integrity to their state's judiciary and to protect the people of their state.

Consider that tomorrow it would be illegal for any member of the bar association to hold open a door for me as it could be interpreted for disciplinary action if they helped me in any way.

I will be in Federal Court tomorrow. I plan to restore the reputation and integrity of the judiciary and the legal profession. I will provide each state the opportunity to restore the ability of disciplinary and review boards to perform their designated functions professionally and effectively. I plan to restore justice to the United States for everyone - the victims, the children, the families - and more importantly for Americans who have no idea that their Constitutional Rights were at risk when they needed them most.

I respect that the State government has not gotten in my way to prevent my efforts. I understand they are following the law.

It was only at the point where my Constitutional rights were unavailable that this resolution became visible and possible.
I never imagined it would come to this.
I plan to succeed.

Terance

UPDATE: An overwhelming situation, which occurs each time I retell or retype one part, it destroys me emotionally. It became necessary to delay a few days. The necessity of having it right superceded the want of having it done today. - It's gonna happen.

A Message to the Pro Se Victims

My post yesterday about the American Bar Association was an essential step in the recovery of our rights.

I am a Pro Se victim as well. Read the site and you know I know your suffering.

There are things which must happen in a precise way at this point. I am working on them. I understand how they must happen. If not done properly and with the proper understanding of the overall situation, it will only result in the frustration we have experienced for years.

The problem was designed to resist correction at all costs.

I've got this figured out. Getting to the root problem was no easy task.

The correction requires everyone I turned to for help to get out of my way. They couldn't be involved in any way - and they haven't been. [They received the nastygrams yesterday which indicated to them that I know.] If they didn't want this to be resolved, there would have been a clear indication. It seems this morning, they have done absolutely nothing. This is essential to the resolution.

Taking any action right now may cause you great frustration. Knowing the problem and fixing the problem is a very precise situation in this case. While I know we have been beaten to the point where trust is something we can only hope to be capable of doing again someday.

I understand. Read my story. I've got this. Trust me.

Terance