Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body.
Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion.
Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled.
For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed an unavailable to subsequent investigators.
Once a favorable verdict (usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim) is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed.
The Norristown Grand Jury could be acting to subvert and conceal evidence in Healy v Healy.
By silencing Kathleen Kane and preventing an investigation by the Attorney General.
By using Judge Carolyn Carluccio's husband as the Special Prosecutor who guides the Grand Jury.
The Grand Jury supervised by Judge Carpenter who was behind the perjury trap sprung on a victim of intrusive illegal surveillance tools available to the county which provided access to computers and permitted evidence to 'change'.
Where a Court order issued preventing Attorney General Kathleen Kane from speaking about the case.
Where a Mystery document was sent to the Superior Court. The Court responded. Yet, the document and response has not been provided or made available to the litigants.
Could this be ONE of the Secret Court Orders issued to silence Kathleen Kane?
Counting back the days from the story of her attorneys filing an Appeal in the matter aligns the secret order with the timeline of the Superior Court Response.
There is the issue of impropriety and bias in the Superior Court, where the documents being sent from the court lack signatures and go on to violate MOST IF NOT ALL of the Judicial Canons.
There is the as yet unspoken issue of the Superior Court not recusing when their direct involvment in the harrassment actions in Healy v Healy was realized.
If the Superior Court of Philadelphia had recused their would be an explanation necessary which could reveal fraud to conceal prior fraud in the matter.
It seems that The Superior Court handles Wire Taps... so if Montgomery County was seeking to tap my phones they would have had to have it authorized by the Superior Court.
As I was not engaged in illegal activity, the surveillance actions can clearly be exposed as designed to harrass, threaten, intimidate and terrorize. While trying to set me up to commit a crime.
The Superior Court in Philadelphia should have recused, BUT couldn't where it would reveal truth... and liabilities.
Rule 1.6 Confidentiality and Mandate of Non-disclosure has caused the entire course of justice to become UNDONE, subverted, perverted and twisted to the point where the court exist ONLY to terrorize the litigant/Defendant/Appellant.
The drive to mislead, misinform and misdirect which is demonstrated in EVERY responsive action suggests that those behind the denial of my constitutional rights while concealed by Rule 1.6 Confidentiality would sooner commit further crimes, than to resolve any issue.
Rule 1.6 affects the actions of EVERY LEGAL PROFESSIONAL - so that explains their lack of facts and law to support any of their actions, or interceptions, while preventing the judiciary from hearing the matter - or maybe even knowing about it.
BUT, AS LEGAL PROFESSIONALS THEY KNOW THAT THE CONSTITUTION IS BEING IGNORED... and Judges and Lawyers are supposed to take action when they see things like that happen. What are they waiting for?
I'm going to try to break Kathleen Kane out of the cone of silence the courts have placed around her.
There's still a few loopholes in Rule 1.6
No comments:
Post a Comment