November 15, 2014
Gregory R. Neuhauser
Chief Deputy Attorney General
Litigation Section
15th Floor, Strawberry Square
Harrisburg, PA 17120
RE: Your File #3600
With regard to the Notice pursuant to Rule 521.
The Superior Court of PA - Central Legal Staff (CLS) are exposed violating PA Law, and Constitutional Rights. There is no authority for the Central Legal Staff to act alone on matters. They have violated Pennsylvania law, obstructed justice, interfered with the administration of the courts, demonstrated their participation in a conspiracy to deny, prevent and obstruct justice, and committed multiple acts of fraud.
Where these actions demonstrate a denial of constitutionally protected rights, there can be no assertion by CLS that their fraudulent actions can be excused and ignored by asserting Rule 1.6 BECAUSE THAT EXPOSES RULE 1.6 PERMITTING THE DENIAL OF MY CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED RIGHTS. Ergo, Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional.
It is unlikely that any member of the Superior Court Judiciary will come to the aid of the Central Legal Staff with signatures because the level of corruption involved in the lower courts has already demonstrated a lack of judicial independence causing the loss of judicial immunity.
Please review the attached documents filed with the Superior Court.
I wish to have the Central Legal Staff of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania criminally prosecuted to the fullest extent of state and federal law. Please advise, as PA Law requires I delay seeking civil damages until criminal prosecution has been addressed.
Terance Healy
871 Mustang Road
Warrington, PA 18976
Attached:
Notice / Complaint of Unconstitutional Actions
Motion for Reconsideration
Notice of Unavailability of Signed Documents
Motion for Reconsideration of Oral Argument
Motion for Proposed course of Action Towards Resolution
Motion for Production of Documents
Motion for Corrections to The Docket
Motion for the Applicable Rule of Law
ANNOTATED VERSION of unsigned Memorandum
PDF version
No comments:
Post a Comment