Motion for Reconsideration of Oral Argument

Filed in Superior Court - PDF Version

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA

Terance Healy	:
(Appellant)	: # 900 EDA 2014
	:
v.	:
	:
David Miller Jennifer K. Miller	:
(Appellee)	:

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORAL ARGUMENT


Appellant respectfully requests reconsideration of the opportunity to present an oral argument in this matter.

Where the Appellee through their Brief has neglected to provide or demonstrate any validity of the jurisidiction of the Court to issue the Order presented to this Court in support of ownership;

Where the Appellee through their Brief have neglected and failed to address any of the elements of jurisdiction which have been demonstrated to be lacking and which cause their asserted order to be procedurally defective and void;

Where the Appellee through the statements of their attorney in court have neglected and failed to address any of the elements of jurisdiction which have been demonstrated to be lacking and which cause their asserted order to be procedurally defective and void;

and

Where a NOTICE/COMPLAINT OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTIONS, copy attached, has been filed with this Court by the Appellant.

Appellant requests reconsideration of the opportunity to present his argument with the court in this matter.

Respectfully

Terance Healy

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, this Court should reverse the decision of the district court and refer the matter to the District Court, or the United States Supreme Court, for presention and review of the Constitutionality of Rule 1.6.


AN ORAL ARGUMENT IS REQUESTED.


We lawfully and strongly demand restoration of our constitutional rights and petition this Honorable Court to review the constitutional matter.


Respectfully submitted,

Terance Healy
Todd M. Krautheim

---

RETURN TO REPLY BRIEF INDEX