Monday, March 17, 2014

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, this Court should reverse the decision of the district court and refer the matter to the District Court, or the United States Supreme Court, for presention and review of the Constitutionality of Rule 1.6.


AN ORAL ARGUMENT IS REQUESTED.


We lawfully and strongly demand restoration of our constitutional rights and petition this Honorable Court to review the constitutional matter.


Respectfully submitted,

Terance Healy
Todd M. Krautheim


RETURN TO REPLY BRIEF INDEX

No comments:

Post a Comment