| RULE 1.6 mandates confidentiality of information by lawyers and judges and prosecutors and attorneys general where the information: - would affect the integrity of the judiciary, - would reveal the prosecutorial misconduct of their own office, or - would expose individual liability. |
The Questions asked on this site and in The Corruption FAQ written in 2004/5 indicate Rule 1.6 is responsible for the corruption, the injustice and the failure to resolve issues.
When I first read the FAQ in 2007, I absolutely refused to accept or believe that anything could be that insurmountable. By 2011, I had experienced each and every aspect of the hopelessness presented in the FAQ. The FAQ is 100% accurate. It only failed where it did not provide the cause or the escape.
The author, Dr. Les Sachs, left the United States to find a political refuge and escape threats. We exchanged emails a few years ago discussing my experience as it was documented on this web site.
I wrote a letter to the Montgomery County Judiciary. After surviving their injustice and lawlessness for over 7 years and 18 judges, I delivered a letter to the judges. Not out of anger. Not out of frustration. It was a sincere attempt to obtain information. They never replied. (Of Course NOT. Rule 1.6 would not allow it.)
In the letter To the Judiciary of Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, I asked:
Rule 1.6 is what is wrong with them. Rule 1.6 mandates the judiciary to become an organization which coordinates and conspires to conceal errors and injustices. The victim of the injustice must return to the 'affected' court to resolve defects and errors, and in doing so causes the corruption to be further exposed by the evidence of the court's actions. Rule 1.6 mandates further injustice for the victim to protect the integrity of the judiciary.
The opening paragraph to the Corruption FAQ.Information for the many victims of USA legal injustice, and for anyone seeking to understand America’s terrifying legal system, and how America really works.
IT STOPPED WORKING, RULE 1.6 MANDATED THE INJUSTICE IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM.
Why American lawyers and judges are destroying families, sending innocent people to prison, and why average working people cannot get justice in American courts.
WHEN YOU KNOW AND APPLY RULE 1.6, THE CAUSE OF THE DESTRUCTION, THE CAUSE OF INJUSTICE IN AMERICAN COURTS BECOMES CLEAR.
This FAQ is especially important, because America’s major news media are afraid to talk about wrongdoing by lawyers and judges. Here is the truth that the U.S. media knows, but hides from the public.
RULE 1.6 MANDATES CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION. THE AMERICAN MEDIA CLEARS EVERY STORY WITH THEIR LEGAL DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO PUBLICATION. LAWYERS DECIDE THE NEWS THAT GETS DISTRIBUTED. RULE 1.6 IS CONFIDENTIAL.
THE CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE OF RULE 1.6 HAS NOT BEEN CARRIED BY ANY NEWS MEDIA.
Hard Copies were hand-delivered to every major news outlet in the Philadelphia/New York area. The story was emailed to every major news media outlet on the planet. (That we could find.)
AND NOTHING WAS PUBLISHED.
1. I’ve been a victim of wrongdoing by a judge or lawyer – where do I start in getting help?
RULE 1.6 MANDATES NO JUDGE OR LAWYER TAKE ANY ACTION WHICH EXPOSES THE INJUSTICE. THERE IS NO HELP AVAILABLE BECAUSE RULE 1.6 MAKES THAT HELP ILLEGAL.
2. I thought America was a “free country” with the “greatest legal system in the world” – so why is my situation such a difficult problem?
RULE 1.6 MANDATES LEGAL PROFESSIONALS TAKE NO ACTION TO HELP AS IT MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIARY, IMPACT THE LAWYERS REPUTATION, OR BE SELF_INCRIMINATING, OR HURT THEIR CLIENTS SUCCESS. RULE 1.6 EXCUSES THEIR INACTION. RULE 1.6 EXCUSES THEIR UNLAWFUL ACTIONS EVEN WHERE IT VIOLATES YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. YOUR SITUATION IS DIFFICULT BECAUSE THE LAWYERS AND JUDGES WHO CAUSED IT ARE MANDATED TO PREVENT EXPOSURE OF THEIR MISDEEDS.
3. What about the grievance procedures for dishonest and criminal judges?
RULE 1.6 PREVENTS PROSECUTION OF DISHONEST AND CRIMINAL JUDGES. THE IRONIC THING IS THE RULE WHICH PURPORTS TO PROTECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIARY, SACRIFICES THE INTEGRITY OF EACH JUDGE THAT BECOMES INVOLVED IN YOUR CASE.
4. What about the local Bar or Bar association – Aren’t they supposed to go after crooked lawyers and judges?
RULE 1.6 MANDATES THE PROTECTION OF THE REPUTATION OF CROOKED LAWYERS AND JUDGES. RULE 1.6 WAS AUTHORED BY THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION. THE BAR ASSOCIATION MANDATES REGULAR TRAINING OF ITS MEMBER LAWYERS AND JUDGES - THAT TRAINING TEACHES THEM TO AVOID AND IGNORE THE INJUSTICE CAUSED BY THEIR RULE 1.6.
5. Why is it so hard to find a lawyer to fight legal or judicial corruption, why are all the lawyers afraid to help me?
RULE 1.6 MANDATES THAT A LAWYER IGNORE LEGAL AND JUDICIAL CORRUPTION. ANY LAWYER TAKING ON A CASE TAINTED BY CORRUPTION KNOWS THEY CAN NOT WIN. THE LAWYER WILL BE REQUIRED TO MISLEAD THEIR CLIENT, OR DELIBERATELY FAIL TO PROPERLY REPRESENT THEIR CLIENTS INTERESTS. WHERE THAT MISREPRESENTATION IS ACTIONABLE AND A CLIENT BRINGS THE LAWYER INTO COURT, THE JUDGE IGNORES THE CRIME BECAUSE THE LAWYER WAS MANDATED BY RULE 1.6 TO PROTECT THE REPUTATION OF LAWYERS, OR THE INTEGRITY OF THE COURT.
6. Aren’t there lawyers who specialize in “legal malpractice” or misconduct by lawyers?
RULE 1.6 MANDATES CONFIDENTIALITY OF ANY INJUSTICE WHICH OCCURS IN THE COURT. MISCONDUCT IS IGNORED BY THE DISCIPLINARY BOARDS WHICH DISMISS COMPLAINTS TO PROTECT THE REPUTATION OF LAWYERS.
7. I read about crazy lawsuits for trivial reasons where people win money – so why can’t I find a lawyer to fight serious issues of legal corruption?
RULE 1.6 MANDATES CONFIDENTIALITY OF ANY INJUSTICE WHICH OCCURS IN THE COURT. ANY LAWYER IS PREVENTED BY LAW FROM DISCUSSING THE CORRUPTION WITH THEIR CLIENT.
8. I had a lawyer in my original legal case, but he acted weak, timid and stupid in the courtroom, he didn’t try to strongly defend me – Why was that?
WHERE POSSIBLE RULE 1.6 MANDATES THE LAWYER TAKE THE BLAME FOR THE FAILURE OF YOUR CASE. THE LAWYER IS INDEED 'ACTING' WEAK, TIMID AND STUPID BECAUSE ANY OTHER TYPE OF ACTION RISKS EXPOSING THE INJUSTICE AND CORRUPTION.
9. What about prosecutors and police – won’t the prosecutors or the FBI go after crooked lawyers and judges?
PROSECUTORS ARE LAWYERS. RULE 1.6 MANDATES PROSECUTORS IGNORE CROOKED LAWYERS AND JUDGES. FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT LACKS JURISDICTION IN THE STATE UNLESS INVITED IN BY A PROSECUTOR, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OR ATTORNEY GENERAL - ALL LAWYERS MANDATED TO IGNORE CROOKED LAWYERS AND JUDGES. THERE ARE LIMITED ALTERNATIVES WHICH PERMITS PEOPLE TO INVITE FEDERAL INVESTIGATORS INTO ANY JURISDICTION. THOSE LOOPHOLES ARE QUICKLY ADDRESSED BY AMENDMENT OF RULE 1.6. (THIS LEAVES AN AUDIT TRAIL WHICH REVEALS THE TRUE PURPOSE OF RULE 1.6).
THE SHERIFF IS THE CHIEF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL IN EVERY COUNTY - AND USUALLY IS NOT A LAWYER. THE SHERIFF HAS THE AUTHORITY TO ENFORCE THE LAW AND/OR TO REQUEST FEDERAL ASSISTANCE TO INVESTIGATE. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES HAVE UNDERMINED AND MISLEAD THE SHERIFFS. JUDGES HAVE RULED AGAINST SHERIFFS CONVINCING SHERIFFS THAT THE CHIEF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER IN THE COUNTY LACKS ANY LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY.
10. Is it true that once I become a victim of judicial and legal corruption, I basically become an “outlaw” to the whole legal system in America?
RULE 1.6 IS LAW IN EVERY STATE. THE INJUSTICE ASSOCIATED WITH ANY JUDGE IS NOT RESTRICTED TO ANY ONE COURTROOM OR COUNTY OR STATE. THE VICTIM LOSES ALL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND HAS NO PROTECTION OF THE LAW. THE INJUSTICE CAN FURTHER EXTEND INTO FEDERAL DISTRICT COURTS.
THE CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE OF RULE 1.6 WILL SOON TEST THE INFLUENCE ON THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEALS, AND THEN THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT. SHOULD THOSE COURTS DEMONSTRATE INFLUENCE BY RULE 1.6, PLAINTIFF'S WILL BE LEFT WITH NO ALTERNATIVE BUT TO SEEK AN ACT OF CONGRESS TO ADDRESS THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND PERVASIVE RULE WHICH UNDERMINES THE JUDICIARY AT EVERY LEVEL.
11. Is it just a question of money – could I fix things if I had some money?
RULE 1.6 WILL LEAVE YOU IN A FINANCIAL RUIN. NO AMOUNT OF MONEY CAN RESOLVE THE INJUSTICE WITHIN THE COURT. THE INJUSTICE MAY FADE, BUT THE VICTIM IS ALWAYS AT RISK.
12. Why doesn’t someone fight this whole big crooked system – What is keeping all of this going?
RULE 1.6 IS SELF SUSTAINING. ONCE IMPROPERLY ENACTED BY THE STATE SUPREME COURT, THE RULE COULD NOT BE REPEALED OR REMOVED AS IT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIARY AND THE REPUTATION OF LAWYERS. THE RESULT: THE STATE SUPREME COURT COULD NOT LAWFULLY ACT TO CORRECT THEIR ERROR.
13. But with the judges so out of control in America, aren’t there rich people and political groups that have even more power than the judges?
NO. THOSE RICH PEOPLE AND POLITICAL GROUPS ARE ALSO ADVISED BY LAWYERS. RULE 1.6 REQUIRES THEIR LAWYERS TO DO NOTHING WHICH WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIARY.
14. How is the power of the big corporations in America, connected to the abuse of power by judges and lawyers?
THE BIG CORPORATIONS ARE GUIDED BY LAWYERS. RULE 1.6 REQUIRES THEIR LAWYERS TO DO NOTHING WHICH WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIARY.
15. What kind of a deal is in place between America’s judges and lawyers, on the one hand, and the corporations and multi-millionaires?
THE AUTHOR OF RULE 1.6 IS THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION. MEMBERSHIP INCLUDES ALL LAWYERS AND JUDGES WHO ARE PRACTICING LAW. MOST DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS AGAINST LAWYERS ARE DUE TO THEIR FAILURE TO PAY THEIR DUES OR TO ATTEND ABA TRAINING CLASSES.
16. I couldn’t get help from my political representative, about my battle with a crooked judge or crooked lawyer – Why won’t the politicians help me?
MANY POLITICIANS ARE LAWYERS WHO ARE MANDATED NOT TO HELP. THOSE WHO ARE NOT LAWYERS OFTEN CONSULT WITH THE POLITICIANS WHO ARE LAWYERS AND ARE MISINFORMED AND PREVENTED FROM ASSISTING THE VICTIM.
NON-LAWYER POLITICIANS HAVE NOTICED THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROBLEMS, AND THEIR INABILITY TO ASSIST THEIR CONSTITUENTS BUT THEY HAVE BEEN PREVENTED FROM ACTION.
17. So the current state of legal corruption, is really supported by both political parties, the Democrats and the Republicans together?
RULE 1.6 CROSSES ALL POLITICAL, SOCIAL, RACIAL AND IDEOLOGICAL BOUNDARIES.
18. Is the problem of judicial and legal corruption, the same as the problem of “political activist judges”, or is that a different issue?
RULE 1.6 AFFECTS ALL JUDGES.
19. There are so many organizations out there – isn’t there an organization that will help me fight wrongdoing by a judge or lawyers?
THE ONLY ORGANIZATION WHICH COULD POSSIBLY HELP WOULD HAVE NO LAWYERS MANDATED BY RULE 1.6.
THE CREATION OF THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION (ACLU) COINCIDES WITH RULE 1.6 BEING ENACTED IN THE MID-80's.
VICTIMS OF INJUSTICE AND DENIAL OF THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ALL SHARE A COMMON STORY OF BEING TURNED AWAY BY THE ACLU.
20. I’ve got great evidence, and an important story, of judicial or legal corruption. How do I get the news media to cover my case?
THE MEDIA IS GUIDED BY THEIR LAWYERS WHO PREVENT EXPOSURE OF ANYTHING WHICH ADVERSELY AFFECTS THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIARY AND THE REPUTATION OF LAWYERS.
HAVE YOU SEEN ANY COVERAGE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE OF RULE 1.6 WHICH WAS FILED IN AUGUST 2013? NOT A WORD HAS BEEN PUBLISHED IN ANY MEDIA OTHER THAN THE PLAINTIFF'S SITES AND THEIR FRIENDS FACEBOOK WALLS.
21. What about investigative reporters – won’t they be interested in my story of legal or judicial corruption?
THE MEDIA IS GUIDED BY THEIR LAWYERS WHO PREVENT EXPOSURE OF ANYTHING WHICH ADVERSELY AFFECTS THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIARY AND THE REPUTATION OF LAWYERS.
22. What about the alternative or radical or foreign news media – won’t they be interested in my story of legal or judicial corruption?
THE WORLDWIDE MEDIA IS GUIDED BY THEIR LAWYERS WHO PREVENT EXPOSURE OF ANYTHING WHICH ADVERSELY AFFECTS THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIARY AND THE REPUTATION OF LAWYERS.
23. What about the professors at the law schools – aren’t they studying and writing about legal corruption?
MANY LAWYERS HAVE WRITTEN OF THE MORAL AND ETHICAL PROBLEM CAUSED BY RULE 1.6. UNFORTUNATELY, AS LAWYERS THEY MAY NOT LAWFULLY ADDRESS THE PROBLEM. RULE 1.6 DOES NOT END WHEN A LAWYER CEASES BEING A LAWYER. RULE 1.6 AFFECTS AND CONTROLS LAWYERS AND JUDGES UNTIL THEIR DEATH.
24. There’s all these rich business executives getting convicted now, like Martha Stewart – Doesn’t that prove that the system is really working?
RULE 1.6 JUSTIFIES AND EXCUSES THE MISINFORMATION PROVIDED TO THE NEWS MEDIA. RICH BUSINESS EXECUTIVES CAN BE VICTIMIZED BY INJUSTICE ALSO.
25. What about being my own lawyer in court, and filing lawsuits against legal corruption on my own?
YOU WILL BE ABLE TO DOCUMENT EVERY ASPECT OF YOUR INJUSTICE ON THE COURT RECORD. RULE 1.6 WILL MANDATE THAT IT ALL BE IGNORED BY SUBSEQUENT JUDGES. THE INJUSTICE MANDATED BY RULE 1.6 DOES NOT END UNTIL RULE 1.6 ENDS.
26. What things should I keep in mind in dealing with lawyers?
RULE 1.6 IS THE CORE OF THE LAWYERS CODE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT. THE THINGS THAT A LAWYER IS SAYING ARE NOT NEARLY AS RELEVANT AS THE THINGS WHICH ARE NOT BEING SAID. WHEN THE COURT FAILS TO ADDRESS YOUR EVIDENCE OF CORRUPTION AND INJUSTICE, IT IS DELIBERATE, INTENTIONAL AND MANDATED BY RULE 1.6.
27. What is the history of how judges and lawyers got so much power in America?
RULE 1.6 WAS ENACTED INTO LAW IN RESPONSE TO THE FBI'S OPERATION GREYLORD WHICH DECIMATED THE CORRUPT JUDICIARY IN THE COOK COUNTY COURTHOUSE IN CHICAGO IN THE 80's. THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION WANTED TO PROTECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIARY BY MAKING IT ILLEGAL TO PROSECUTE CORRUPT JUDGES.
28. Is the problem of legal and judicial corruption really different or better in other countries, or is it just the same as in America?
RULE 1.6 DOES HAVE VARIANTS IN THE LAWS OF OTHER COUNTRIES. THE COUNTRIES WHICH HAVE ORGANIZATIONS OF LAWYERS STRUCTURED SIMILARLY TO THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION HAVE SIMILAR INJUSTICE PROBLEMS.
29. So what can I do to fight my personal battle against judicial and legal corruption – or is it just hopeless?
PRIOR TO FINDING THE NEEDLE IN THE HAYSTACK OF JUDICIAL CORRUPTION AND INJUSTICE, THE SITUATION WAS HOPELESS.
THE CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE OF RULE 1.6 LAWFULLY ADDRESSES THE CONSTITUTIONAL CALAMITY AND CRISIS CAUSED BY RULE 1.6.
30. What is the best thing happening to fight judicial and legal corruption in America?
AS A SURVIVOR OF JUDICIAL TERROR AND INJUSTICE SINCE 2007, FACING NO FUTURE WITH MY PAST DESTROYED, AND INCAPABLE OF SUICIDE, IT BECAME A NECESSITY TO FIND OUT WHY EVERYONE IN LAW ENFORCEMENT THOUGHT IT WAS OK TO IGNORE MY UNDENIABLE SITUATION.
FINDING THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE NATIONAL FAILURE TO ADDRESS CORRUPTION AND INJUSTICE PRESENTED THE OPPORTUNITY TO FIX WHAT NO LAWYER OR JUDGE COULD LAWFULLY FIX.
TERANCE HEALY AND TODD KRAUTHEIM PREPARED THE CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE OF RULE 1.6 WHICH WAS FILED ON AUGUST 8, 2013 AND SERVED UPON THE ATTORNEYS GENERAL OF EACH STATE TO RESTORE THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE, RESURRECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIARY, AND REPAIR THE REPUTATION OF LAWYERS NATIONWIDE.
JUSTICE IS COMING.
No comments:
Post a Comment