Is AG Kathleen Kane permitted to speak? Yet?

Is Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane permitted to speak?
- About those two secret orders?
- About the two secret courts which issued them?
- About the investigation she is not permitted to conduct?
- About the case she is not permitted to participate in?
- About the actual subject of the grand jury investigation?
- About the corruption mentioned on CNN?

Why does it seem the actions of Prosecutors and District Attorneys are behind the effort to silence the Attorney General. AND... is also the source of the information and attacks against the Attorney General.

After reading the New Years Eve Manifesto from former DA Bruce Castor about his 'skills' - abuse of power, corruption, strategic actions against perceived enemies. The effort to silence AG Kathleen Kane could be described exactly as Castor boasts:

"Career lawmen think strategically. They don’t go for the immediate gratification of a personal attack, instead preferring to set the board up just right and striking at the precise moment where the object of the attack cannot recover."

Could the Pennsylvania District Attorneys Association (PDAA) be the center of the effort to undermine the Attorney General using strategic misinformation and disinformation methods knowing that Kathleen Kane cannot respond - either because of those SECRET COURT ORDERS or because of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information. The District Attorneys have IGNORED the cases where Rule 1.6 Injustice has been triggered.

Has Bruce Castor - Former President of PDAA - violated the first rule of 'Fight Club'?

Rule 1.6 has been demonstrated to be unconstitutional - with complaints and evidence of the crimes and constitutional violations sent to two District Attorneys, the Attorney General of PA, and the US Attorney among others. Where the timing of events corresponds, AG Kane may have been secretly ordered to ignore the Rule 1.6 issue.

Why have the Philadelphia and Bucks County District Attorneys also neglected to acknowledge, respond or investigate? Could it be that they are involved in seeking those secret court orders which prevent Attorney General Kane from addressing the unconstitutional law - a responsibility of the Attorney General defined by law and procedure. The Attorney General has failed to address the matter in the Superior Court. (The Superior Court has concealed a document filed in the appeal and the court's response to that document. A Request for a copy of those documents has been IGNORED.)

Where the Judicial Branch has ordered the Executive Branch to ignore the laws of the Legislative branch, the judiciary has overthrown the entire state government in a broad violation of the Separation of Powers pursuant to and concealed by Rule 1.6 - Confidentiality of Information.

If you are going to deny a person of their constitutional rights and prevent any effort to address the issue of the unconstitutional law which has undermined his rights and denied any protection of the law since 2007, THAT BEST BE KEPT SECRET.

The secret orders are not valid because they seek to deny a person of their constitutional rights. Secretly issuing an order to restrict the efforts of a collateral authority, an attorney general, is ultimately improper and unconstitutional as it orders an official to violate their oath of office and the responsibilities of their office while permitting the US Constitution and the state Constitution to be ignored.

Rule 1.6 is again 'at play' indirectly undermining the rights of a person and demonstrating it's unconstitutional effect in the immediate event. An unconstitutional law is no law, a nullity, as if it never existed. However, until it is unconstitutional it is considered law. Where the Attorney General must follow the law, the corrupt perversion of Rule 1.6 becomes clear as it undermines the authority of the Attorney General.

Rule 1.6 has a built-in self defense which interferes and prevents it from being declared "unconstitutional".

"What is right is not always the same as what is legal." - Edward Snowden

The workaround: Non-lawyers in the Pennsylvania Legislature can act to suspend Rule 1.6 according to the PA Constitution Article I Section 12. Once suspended, the lawyers and legal professionals may address the issue and begin to restore their reputation and the integrity of the courts.

Americans will not be passive when they learn of the summary denial of constitutional rights because of an improperly enacted unconstitutional law which requires lawyers to be silent while incredible injustice occurs and the state and federal judiciary is undermined.

It seems very clear that the matter documented on this web site - A TERRORISTIC DIVORCE - is related to every issue, everyone and everything which has been published. Bruce Castor was the District Attorney when the case began in 2007. Risa Ferman has ignored a litany of crimes which violated the LAW and several court orders, AND additionally prevented investigations brought to her detectives by other County Officials.


Yet, it is what the media is not mentioning which I find intriguing...
- those two secret orders?
- the two secret courts which issued them?
- the investigation she is not permitted to conduct?
- the case she is not permitted to participate in?
- the actual subject of the grand jury investigation?
- the corruption mentioned on CNN?

When Kathleen Kane decides to speak, and is permitted to speak about those SECRET court orders, the prevented investigation and obstruction of the AG responsibilities, and is permitted to address the ACTUAL grand jury presentment and correct misinformation and disinformation...

I imagine it is going to be BIG. HUGE. BEYOND ANY PREVIOUS CONCEPT OR SCOPE OF PUBLIC CORRUPTION.

On CNN in November, Kane indicated:
“I knew that I was walking into public corruption. Which again is why I ran.”

“But I will tell you this. Even I am shocked at the level of public corruption.”

“I am shocked at how deep it goes.
I am shocked at how powerful it is.
I have never seen anything like this. It’s breathtaking.
It has been described by the people familiar with what is happening as shameful.”

“But, if this can be done to me as Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer of the 5th largest state in the country, I am sickened to think what can and may be done to regular, good people who don’t have the resources that I have to challenge it.”

If my experience with the extreme corruption within Montgomery County is any indication... those remarks from AG Kane indicate she recognizes what has occurred and understands my litigation and the necessity of the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6

The United States is on the threshold of a new age of JUSTICE... and end to the pervasive INJUSTICE.

I believe that Kathleen Kane recognizes her responsibility and comprehends her unique opportunity to make that happen.

JUSTICE IS COMING.

Genuine Title

Your lawyer is bragging about the injustice of the Weilheimer decision. Seriously?

How laughable that a lawyer in a large Philadelphia law firm records his 2014 successes - TWO - and the one entry is based on corruption and fraud with no support in law and an appeal is pending.

Your lawyer wasn't representing the Millers.* The Millers didn't even bother to show up. If the Millers had shown up maybe they could explain that "Weilheimer for Judge" sign on the lawn? Judge Weilheimer couldn't explain it.* Are we supposed to believe that in a local election, people believe so much in a candidate that they do not know and have never met that they seek out and obtain a sign supporting their election?

The lawyer failed to address the essential issue.** The lack of jurisdiction of the order they were seeking to enforce.** No mention of anything which supported jurisdiction in the entire transcript.** Yet the lack of jurisdiction was proven beyond any doubt on the court record... AND COMPLETELY IGNORED BY JUDGE WEILHEIMER.***

In the Appeal, Judge Weilheimer delayed 5 months in issuing her opinion. Justice delayed is justice denied. In her opinion she neglects to offer any support for the jurisdiction of the defective and void order.***

YET, THE LAWYER IS BRAGGING ABOUT THIS 'WIN' ON THE COMPANY WEB SITE. The lawyer who neglected to reveal that his client was Genuine Title Company.**** He never met the Defendants.

Bragging about the deliberate infliction of injustice. A big win - still pending appeal. A pathetic display of arrogance in the face of judicial corruption and injustice. Keeping a man homeless and destitute for a prolonged period while trying to regain his rightful property after enduring constant litigation since 2007.

* Rule 1.6 - Confidentiality of client identity
** Rule 1.6 - Do not adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary
*** Rule 1.6 - Do not self incriminate. Do not adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary.
**** Rule 1.6 - Confidentiality of client identity

Ejectment Action Against Homeowners Dismissed - April 9, 2014




Is this posted on your mother's fridge?

Void, lack jurisdiction, lacks power, is fraud... can be attacked ANYTIME.

It is a simple concept. How difficult could it be to get an error corrected? I've been trying to be heard since May 2011. BUT, I had to wait for a petition that I could respond to.

The tricky part is getting in front of a judge. The phrase "provided the party is properly before the court". is an important one.

When Judge Carluccio was notified in writing in a petition AND an emergency petition, ... I wasn't able to get 'properly before the court.'

When Judge Carluccio refused to hold a hearing on her void order... I wasn't able to get 'properly before the court.'

When Judge Carluccio held a short list conference where she ridiculously listened to the title of the piece of paper and completely ignored the content of the document, ... I wasn't able to get 'properly before the court.'

When Judge Carluccio held the bully session on September 23, 2011, ... I wasn't permitted to testify or present any information about the void order... while Judge Carluccio issued a third void order. I wasn't able to get properly before the court.

Properly before the court in July 2012, Judge Haaz addressed the deliberate actions of Angst & Angst which would cause a lapse in jurisdiction. Judge Haaz recognized that the issues would not be resolved in a short list conference. He ordered a hearing which was never scheduled.

However, when Judge Page conducted the hearings in February 2013, I was FINALLY properly before the court and the issue of the void order was very relevant to the petitions being discussed. Judge Page IGNORED the challenge to jurisdiction and ordered an absurd enforcement of a void order based on a void order, based on a void order, based on a defective divorce decree.

The issue is that while they deny me access to the courts, there is no way to retroactively provide jurisdiction to the defective divorce decree. So the delays only serve to harass, intimidate and threaten while my life passes by waiting for justice. I persevere.

A void judgment which includes judgment entered by a court which lacks jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter, or lacks inherent power to enter the particular judgment, or an order procured by fraud, can be attacked at any time, in any court, either directly or collaterally, provided that the party is properly before the court. Long v. Shorebank Development Corp., 182 F.3d 548 ( C.A. 7 Ill. 1999).

Jurisdiction... a necessity ignored.

Jurisdiction refers to the power of the court to decide a case; to render a decision that will be recognized and enforced by authorities and other courts.

Jurisdiction
- Requires the court have jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action
- Requires the court have jurisdiction over each party to the action
- Requires due process of law - the appearance or service of process (notice of pendency of the lawsuit) before the defendant can be personally bound by any judgment.
- If the defendant has not received proper notice, the court's power to adjudicate is imperfect.
- Defective service of process goes to lack of notice.
- Due process requires notice and an opportunity to be heard.

Challenging Jurisdiction - MUST BE ADDRESSED BY THE COURT.

Judges who ignore questions of jurisdiction, likely lack jurisdiction and have acted improperly, or criminally. Judges who repeatedly fail to address the lack of jurisdiction are abusing their power under color of law.

Deliberately ignoring a lack of jurisdiction when properly before the court is an abuse of power under color of law.

The judges have had plenty of opportunity to indicate the requirements of jurisdiction for their [void] orders.
They have NOT addressed their jurisdiction because doing so would reveal their corrupt actions.

I have indicated the failures in regard to jurisdiction. THIS HAS BEEN IGNORED.

For presenting the criminal lack of jurisdiction and the malicious retaliation of the judges when confronted with the errors, I have been destroyed and my civil rights further eliminated. The failures grow, and the corrupt abusive actions of the judges become more and more blatant.

Appealing their void orders and the malicious orders attempting to enforce void orders has lead to further injustice where judges have acted without jurisdiction while jurisdiction rests with the Superior Court. Those actions illegally and unethically prevent the matter from being prepared and transmitted to the Superior Court. Effectively denying access to the courts. A a court which has refused to hold hearings and prevented and ignored due process and procedure is not going to permit a higher court to review their intentional errors to the most basic concept of jurisprudence. It's called ABUSE. It is a crime.

Prosecuting a corrupt judge is rare... and their terroristic retaliation to a challenge causes an inescapable misery which leads many to suicide.

When it is the corruption and lack of integrity caused by the entire judicial bench. Life becomes torture. A nightmare of injustice and unending litigation with no opportunity for judicial review.