Team Corbett continues attacks on the 'silenced' AG Kane

Tom Corbett, Frank Fina, Seth Williams, Bob Brady, Dave Heckler, Stewart Greenleaf, Bruce Castor, Risa Ferman, Tom Carluccio...

Pointing LOUDLY to one investigation with political suggestions, yet neglecting to address an investigation with two secret court orders from two secret judges in two secret courts.

Why does Team Corbett keep pointing to the 'low hanging fruit'? A distraction from the unprecedented - TWO SECRET COURT ORDERS WHICH PREVENT ACTION, EXPOSURE, INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION. What is that all about???

District Attorneys Heckler & Williams have ignored the well-documented crimes and constitutional violations of the courthouse staff.

Questioning the discretion of the Attorney General in spite of the corruption being concealed by court orders. Those who are not discussing the secret court orders are logically the people responsible for requesting the corrupt judicial actions.

Team Corbett is clearly focused on keeping "everything Sandusky' out of the public domain - if they lose Rule 1.6 Confidentiality then the public will learn EVERYTHING. The Unconstitutional affect of Rule 1.6 is proven in those criminal reports of violation of PA law and the US constitution. If they cannot conceal injustice and corruption under Rule 1.6, they will likely be joining Jerry Sandusky and wearing orange Team Corbett jumpsuits.

Every corrupt action to ignore the unconstitutional law - called Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information - is ONLY protected until the unconstitutional is acknowledged. It is proven in those lapsed investigations in the Philadelphia and Bucks County District Attorney's Offices. The complaint filed in both counties and federally with US Attorney Zane Memeger. An additional investigation was requested by the U.S. Postal Inspectors as the Central Legal Staff of the court used the mail in their fraud and forgery.

Attorney General Kathleen Kane has been court ordered NOT TO INVESTIGATE.

Governor Elect Tom Wolf, Shut Down The Montgomery County Courthouse.

“But I will tell you this. Even I am shocked at the level of public corruption.”
I am shocked at how deep it goes.
I am shocked at how powerful it is.
I have never seen anything like this. It’s breathtaking.
It has been described by the people familiar with what is happening as shameful.”

“But, if this can be done to me as Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer of the 5th largest state in the country, i am sickened to think what can and may be done to regular, good people who don;t have the resources that I have to challenge it.”

- Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane on two court ordered mandates from unidentified judges and unidentified courts.

Kathleen Kane demonstrates restraint - Rule 1.6 as a weapon

Kathleen Kane's credibility is on the line - MORNING CALL July 5, 2014

Rule 1.6 is a law which mandates confidentiality of information. It's unconstitutional. it causes judges to sacrifice their integrity. It requires law enforcement to ignore corruption and injustice. Rule 1.6 mandates that Kathleen Kane not explain that it is being used by those who are well aware of it to attack her credibility where she is mandated to conceal their corruption and misconduct.

Rule 1.6 mandated confidentiality is a tool for corruption and injustice - and the denial of constitutional rights. The Kids For Cash scandal. The Sandusky Conspiracy. Foreclosure through fraud. All enabled, delayed, and ignored for years because of a mandate that lawyers and judges MUST ignore judicial corruption and injustice. Rule 1.6 demands that confidentiality from district attorneys and attorneys general.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 was undermined by a member of Kathleen Kane's office. His actions required the integrity of the federal courts to be sacrificed - made the courts deny the law and the constitution and prevented them from explaining. Because of Rule 1.6, Kathleen Kane can take no action to expose the case being undermined by her office.

The Weaponized version of Rule 1.6, seems to be the choice of the District Attorneys of Pennsylvania. They dare to attack the actions of the Pennsylvania Attorney General with the knowledge that she is not lawfully permitted to answer their statements. Seth Williams hired Frank Fina after Fina undermined his own investigation requiring the case to be dropped. Both know that Attorney General Kane is mandated to confidentiality when it would expose the misconduct of employees of the office of the Attorney General.

Same conditions with regard to the stalled Sandusky investigation which was delayed for years.
The Sandusky report was a sham... mandated by Rule 1.6 to not include misconduct of the investigation. The Supreme Court actually updated the Rules of Professional Conduct to conceal the emails - over 8 times they edited the law for the purpose of email confidentiality. BUT, Rule 1.6 prevents AG Kane from saying it. She must protect the integrity of a court which boldly and arrogantly lacks any shred of integrity. A Supreme court which hides behind a curtain of confidentiality THEY CREATED TO CONCEAL JUDICIAL CORRUPTION.

I have been victimized for over 9 years by injustice and corruption - no protection of the law and no constitutional rights. Homeless, destitute and terrorized to the point where I had to find out why they thought it was OK. Rule 1.6 makes it OK to ignore corruption, injustice and terrorism.

JUSTICE IS COMING. And while Kathleen Kane can't do anything to help because of Rule 1.6 mandating her taking no action, when she is attacked and cannot defend her silences. I CAN.

Rule 1.6 may have been able to annihilate my life... but it does NOT mandate my silence about it's corruption. It does not prevent me from challenging the constitutionality of a very twisted law which has damaged millions of Americans.

I don't know how she can restrain herself. As I read the articles attacking her credibility my respect for her grows. People don't understand. I'm supposed to hate her and be angry at her for what she did NOT do for me. BUT, I understand her silence. Her silent support of my cause. She's following the law... (even if it kills me.)

EVERY. PERSON. MATTERS.

How to Sabotage Attorney General Kathleen Kane

Pay attention Frank Fina.
Pay attention Randall Henzes.

If you want to destroy a case in the Pennsylvania Attorney General's office... it's simple.
All you needs to do is one misdeed which MANDATES the Attorney General into submissive silence.

The Attorney General's clients include the people in her office. Like Frank Fina, Randall Henzes, Claudia Tesoro, etc...

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information applies to revealing information about your client. Who is the Attorney General's client?

So if any of the Attorney General's 'clients' wants a prosecution in the toilet all they need to do is toss that monkeywrench...

---

PERHAPS, improperly sending all surveillance information to the FBI. Surveillance data obtained properly through a judge may not be shared with other jurisdictions.

IF THIS HAPPENS, Rule 1.6 prevents the Attorney General from speaking about it because she must represent her client.

LIKE WHEN Frank Fina sent all the information on a multi-year Philadelphia sting to the FBI... and THEN everyone accused Kathleen Kane of refusing to talk about it... even the lawyers who knew exactly why she couldn't speak. Even Philadelphia District Attorney Seth Williams who blasted Kathleen Kane in the press... and hired Frank Fina into his office.

---

OR PERHAPS, after the Attorney General deliberately defaults on a national issue. Someone improperly files a document LATE with the court, doing it wrong and getting assistance from the clerk, and then failing to substantiate the matter sacrifices the integrity of the court.

IF THIS HAPPENS, Rule 1.,6 prevents the Attorney General from speaking about it or taking any actions to discipline the person in her office, or any action to retract it because it would reveal the corruption caused by Rule 1.6. The court has to protect the court without concern for justice.

LIKE WHEN Randall Henzes filed a document on September 6, 2013, which was not done properly so the clerk of courts MODIFIED (something they NEVER DO) the filing on September 9, 2013. Then submitting documents which couldn't substantiate his claim, BUT the court's integrity was at stake and the court is mandated to protect it no matter the injustice. The Attorney General's office is required to protect the perpetrator even going so far as to assign another person to the appeal in the Third Circuit Court to respond without any substantiation of the claim. Because, they knew the court would not be able to lawfully rule in any other way than to protect the courts.

---

And all those lawyers, district attorneys, prosecutors, judges, etc... who ignored the Luzerne County Kids for Cash scandal for years... and then the Commission filed a completely fraudulent account of why it happened.

Rule 1.6... it's the law that let's crimes become conspiracies without any regard to the number of people harmed. The law which deliberately denies justice and constitutional rights.

---

All those foreclosures nationwide across the United States where people lost their homes based on fraudulent documents and fraudulent business practices and no one was prosecuted... Rule 1.6 mandates the silence of lawyers when their clients are stealing peoples homes through fraud. Without regard to how many millions are harmed. And no one goes to jail.

---

DO WE NOW HAVE AN IDEA ABOUT WHY JERRY SANDUSKY WAS PERMITTED TO DESTROY LIVES FOR YEARS?

And why they had so little regard for Joe Paterno that they allowed him to be blamed for their inaction in prosecuting and stopping Jerry Sandusky.

---

So next time you wonder WHY ATTORNEY GENERAL KATHLEEN KANE IS SAYING NOTHING keep in mind, that's how we cover up injustice and corruption in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Your constitutional rights are being denied and ignored in the courts by the very people trusted to regulate themselves. THEY BLEW IT. And they mandated each other to keep the secret.

Enter the Constitutional Challenge Of Rule 1.6 filed by Pro Se litigants where every state attorney general defaulted to restore the constitutional rights of the people ion their state. UNTIL RANDALL HENZES threw the 'monkeywrench'.

The clerk helped to hide the case somewhat... removing the attorneys general from the docket and not communicating with them. Or in the Third Circuit telling the state attorneys general to not participate.

It doesn't matter who is watching or directly involved, the court, 55 other state attorneys general,... in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, one man (RANDALL HENZES) can prevent the lawful action seeking to restore the constitutional rights of every American citizen which have been denied by Rule 1.6 - CONFIDENTIALITY.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 will move on to the Supreme Court of the United States.... and concurrently to the United States Congress.

THEY THINK THE PEOPLE ARE STUPID.
TIME TO TEACH R-E-S-P-E-C-T.

JUSTICE IS COMING.

The Attorney / Client Rhetoric

The Attorney / Client Rhetoric

First, Rule 1.6 is called CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION. It is NOT called Attorney-Client privilege.

The thing is that Lawyers, such as the state Attorneys General, are often not even certain of their client.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 is demonstrating the attorneys general dancing around the responsibilities of their office.

From the National Association of Attorneys General we can learn about their dance moves.

So, How to Decide Who Is The Client? The answer is not as simple as picking one from a list of the alternatives. A variety of courts and authors have considered the issue deciding who the client of the government attorney might be. The general consensus is that there are five possible answers to the question: - Public - Government as a whole - Branch of government in which employed - Particular agency or department - Responsible officers who make decisions with an agency or department

NOW, as AG you have to maintain confidentiality of information for all of the above 'clients'.

AND

You must follow Rule 1.6... and maintain confidentiality where the information
- would affect the integrity of the judiciary,
- would reveal the prosecutorial misconduct of their own office, or
- would expose individual liability.

Do you now see why lawyers are not legally allowed to even approach the unconstitutional aspects of Rule 1.6?

But two pro se litigants with over 8 years of experience with the terror of injusrtice are lawfully allowed to do what the lawyers made illegal for each other to do.

Healy & Krautheim can address the unconstitutionality... They file... SILENCE.

Take a look at recent events... Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane has ended a multi-year investigation of corruption where confidential informant(s) were deliberately targeting and setting up a handful of black politicians in Philadelphia. Never so succesfully to result in any prosecution. And this had been going on for years (AG Tom Corbett) and years (AG William Ryan) and years (AG Linda Kelly). The investigation was halted upon the election of AG Kane. So who is the Attorney General's client? Herself? Her predecessors? The Commonwealth? The AG's Office? The Investigators? The Public? Along comes Frank Fina beating his chest like TARZAN and making all kinds of ridiculous accusations about what the Attorney General is keeping secret about HIS investigation gone horribly off track. Fina is a lawyer. He's making broad remarks... wide allegations... talking about the information he knows can't be presented... If any of them ever get specific about the information... They will violate Rule 1.6 Confidentiality and be disciplined/prosecuted. Rule 1.6 is how corruption goes unprosecuted and unpunished. Rule 1.6 is being used as a political game to mislead the public. They all know what they cannot say. They know what each other cannot say. Whenever you are viewing the actions of lawyers who must follow the mandate for corruption and injustice defined by Rule 1.6... The story is more about what they are not saying... and what they are accusing each other of not saying... because they feel safe, hidden and protected. Rule 1.6 is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Imagine. The things we will learn about corruption and injustice when their safe, protected hiding place is no longer available. Those with honor and integrity will be clearly revealed once they are not required to conceal the criminal malice, corruption and injustice of those who undermine our society. Hey Frank Fina... Sit down with us and we will explain it to you. Shouting loud at Attorney General Kathleen Kane who cannot lawfully respond is a cowardly move. Bring the media... It's time the people learned what has happened to their Constitution.

JUSTICE IS COMING.