November 22, 2013
Gary Kline
Domestic Relations Office
P.O. Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404-0311
By facsimile (610) 239-9637.
Healy v Healy 2007-12477
PACSES 853111584
Dear Gary,
Arm of the Court? Seriously? If so, would you care to address the deliberately defective and void order as invalid? Or valid? Things which supercede the Court’s authority include the Law, Due Process, Procedure, etc… A Judge is required to have jurisdiction to issue an Order of the Court.
Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio did not have jurisdiction, therefore she was NOT acting as a judge when she knowingly issued her deliberately defective and void order of May 9, 2011.
The Domestic Relations Office has a responsibility to execute a Court Order when it is valid. When given an invalid and defective order the Domestic Relations Office has a responsibility to respond accordingly to address the defects in the order.
Your department can address the defect in the void order of May 9, 2011. Your department can schedule a hearing to address the defect. The defect is not a judgment, it is procedural. The judge lacked jurisdiction. There is no way to retroactively obtain jurisdiction. The void order is never going to be valid. Never. Ever.
You continue to evade the defect while you perpetrate the invalid order and are complicit in the deliberate corruption ordered and where the County is feigning an obligation to follow a void order while it continues to harass my life.
The Archdiocese of Philadelphia has additionally been served the void and defective order. The deliberate void and defective order continues to attack every aspect of my life.
If you wish to do the right honorable and lawful action, simply recognize the defective and void order and resume APL until the a proper and lawful order can be issued.
The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 exposes the inability of a litigant to get a hearing when an act of judicial misconduct or corruption is involved in a matter. This will explain why Court Administration has been so directly involved in denying access to the court to address the matter.
If you are an attorney who may not lawfully take any action to expose the criminal misconduct and corruption of the judiciary, you are welcome to respond that ‘Pursuant to Rule 1.6, I am unable to take the lawful actions required by my office.’
Another matter, Healy v Miller #2013-29976, also awaits scheduling by Court Administration. In that matter, the Millers are attempting to assert the same void order as a power of attorney instrument. They were the victims of fraud in an amount in excess of $400,000.00.
My personal property and possessions were disposed of as a result of the same defective and void order.
According to the information returned in Healy v Miller, there is support owed which has not been collected by the Domestic Relations Office.
You have not explained why my file is marked CONFIDENTIAL? I am aware that the file has been altered and electronic records have been deleted.
I asked for a meeting, conference or proceeding. None has been scheduled.
I asked for a review of the void and defective order. No review has been scheduled.
I asked for an explanation of the rudeness and false allegations of your staff. It has been ignored.
I am spending another Thanksgiving destitute and homeless because of the complicity of Montgomery County in concealing the corruption and defective order of May 9, 2011. I have persevered through this injustice and terror since the initial concealed act of misconduct in August 2007. The facts are clear. The law is clear. The corruption is clear.
I presume you wanted to be the Director of Domestic Relations, SO DO THE JOB… or resign.
Sincerely,
Terance Healy
cc: Montgomery County Commissioners
Josh Shapiro, Chair
Leslie S. Richards, Vice Chair
Bruce L Castor Jr, Commissioner
Showing posts with label Gary Kline. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gary Kline. Show all posts
Friday, November 22, 2013
Thursday, November 21, 2013
Gary Kline, Arm of the Court?
November 19, 2013
Dear Mr Healy,
I noted in my previous letter that the information you attempted to deliver was received. I looked through the case and the docket with the Courts. I want to assist you but I cannot find anything that would supersede the Courts's Order. I did see that appeals have been filed.
My office is merely an arm of the Court charged with enforcing the Court's Order. At such time as your appeals have been decided upon and an order is entered please let me know and I'll immediately update our records if I haven't already received the new order.
Sincerely,
Gary Kline
Director
Arm of the Court? Seriously? If so, you would address the defective and void order as a part of the judiciary.
Things which supercede the Court's authority include THE LAW, DUE PROCESS and PROCEDURE. A Judge is required to have jurisdiction to issue an Order of the Court. Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio did not have jurisdiction, therefore she was NOT acting as a judge when she issued her deliberately defective and void order of May 9, 2011.
The Domestic Relations Office has a responsibility to execute a Court Order when it is valid. WHEN IT IS GIVEN AN INVALID AND DEFECTIVE COURT ORDER there is a responsibility to respond accordingly to address the defects in the order.
Your department can address the defect in the void order of May 9, 2011. Do your job, or resign and give it to someone who will do the job lawfully.
If you are an attorney who may not take any action to expose the criminal misconduct and corruption of the judiciary, or you have been advised by legal counsel, you are welcome to respond that 'Pursuant to Rule 1.6, I am unable to take the lawful actions required by my office."
Then write your resignation letter, before the County Commissioners must ask for it.
I asked for a meeting. None has been scheduled.
I asked for a review of the void and defective order. No review of the defects has happened.
I presume you wanted to be the Director of Domestic Relations, SO DO THE JOB.
Dear Mr Healy,
I noted in my previous letter that the information you attempted to deliver was received. I looked through the case and the docket with the Courts. I want to assist you but I cannot find anything that would supersede the Courts's Order. I did see that appeals have been filed.
My office is merely an arm of the Court charged with enforcing the Court's Order. At such time as your appeals have been decided upon and an order is entered please let me know and I'll immediately update our records if I haven't already received the new order.
Sincerely,
Gary Kline
Director
Arm of the Court? Seriously? If so, you would address the defective and void order as a part of the judiciary.
Things which supercede the Court's authority include THE LAW, DUE PROCESS and PROCEDURE. A Judge is required to have jurisdiction to issue an Order of the Court. Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio did not have jurisdiction, therefore she was NOT acting as a judge when she issued her deliberately defective and void order of May 9, 2011.
The Domestic Relations Office has a responsibility to execute a Court Order when it is valid. WHEN IT IS GIVEN AN INVALID AND DEFECTIVE COURT ORDER there is a responsibility to respond accordingly to address the defects in the order.
Your department can address the defect in the void order of May 9, 2011. Do your job, or resign and give it to someone who will do the job lawfully.
If you are an attorney who may not take any action to expose the criminal misconduct and corruption of the judiciary, or you have been advised by legal counsel, you are welcome to respond that 'Pursuant to Rule 1.6, I am unable to take the lawful actions required by my office."
Then write your resignation letter, before the County Commissioners must ask for it.
I asked for a meeting. None has been scheduled.
I asked for a review of the void and defective order. No review of the defects has happened.
I presume you wanted to be the Director of Domestic Relations, SO DO THE JOB.
Montgomery County Commissioners
November 21, 2013
Montgomery County Commissioners
Norristown, PA
Josh Shapiro
Leslie Richards
Bruce Castor
Commissioners.
I am writing to ask your intervention in expediting the actions documented in the following documents.
I have been surviving against tremendous injustice since 2007.
Litigation to obtain the home I was illegally removed from has been stalled without explanation and remains unscheduled. All evidence indicates the fraud involved and the lack of jurisdiction regarding the defective and void court order dated May 9, 2011.
Nancy Becker personally assisted in moving the criminal prosecution forward by introducing me to Det. Greg Henry who was already aware of the issues involved in the fraudulent conveyance of my home and property.
Additionally, Gary Kline has failed to respond to questions about the mistreatment by his staff. The Domestic Relations Office is violating my rights, the law and the responsibility of Domestic Relations by following a defective and void order while refusing to address the issues which demonstrate the defects of the order.
I has been destitute and homeless since 2011 and somehow find the ability to persevere awaiting justice. I ask your assistance to address the issues currently before the County.
I beg your intervention and action.
Sincerely,
Terance Healy
included:
Letter November 7, 2013 DRO
Letter November 7, 2013, Gary Kline
Letter November 8, 2013, Sheriff Behr
Response November 13, 2013, Gary Kline
Letter November 19, 2013, Gary Kline
Letter November 19, 2013, Sheriff Behr
Montgomery County Commissioners
Norristown, PA
Josh Shapiro
Leslie Richards
Bruce Castor
Commissioners.
I am writing to ask your intervention in expediting the actions documented in the following documents.
I have been surviving against tremendous injustice since 2007.
Litigation to obtain the home I was illegally removed from has been stalled without explanation and remains unscheduled. All evidence indicates the fraud involved and the lack of jurisdiction regarding the defective and void court order dated May 9, 2011.
Nancy Becker personally assisted in moving the criminal prosecution forward by introducing me to Det. Greg Henry who was already aware of the issues involved in the fraudulent conveyance of my home and property.
Additionally, Gary Kline has failed to respond to questions about the mistreatment by his staff. The Domestic Relations Office is violating my rights, the law and the responsibility of Domestic Relations by following a defective and void order while refusing to address the issues which demonstrate the defects of the order.
I has been destitute and homeless since 2011 and somehow find the ability to persevere awaiting justice. I ask your assistance to address the issues currently before the County.
I beg your intervention and action.
Sincerely,
Terance Healy
included:
Letter November 7, 2013 DRO
Letter November 7, 2013, Gary Kline
Letter November 8, 2013, Sheriff Behr
Response November 13, 2013, Gary Kline
Letter November 19, 2013, Gary Kline
Letter November 19, 2013, Sheriff Behr
Tuesday, November 19, 2013
Gary Kline - Domestic Relation Office
November 19, 2013
Gary Kline, Director
Domestic Relations Section
P.O. Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404-0311
Dear Mr. Kline,
In response to your letter of November 13, 2013, the Order of the Court to which you refer is a void order issued where the court lacked jurisdiction. The order is a nullity.
The evidence of the defect and lack of jurisdiction is on the court record and listed in the court docket for the matter. Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio lacked jurisdiction and authority to issue the Order of May 9, 2011.
Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is “without authority, it’s judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no jurisdiction; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers.”
[Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)]
The Domestic Relations Office by executing and continuing to execute a void order where informed that you are acting on a void order while refusing and denying the opportunity to address the defective order issued without jurisdiction is a violation of your responsibility, a violation of the law, and a violation of my rights.
Your reply also failed to address the behavior of your staff which demonstrates a complicity to deny justice and deliberately deny access and communication with the Domestic Relations Office. It was clearly not the first time a false allegation was used to remove a litigant from the office without recourse. I remind you I was attempting to simply deliver a letter to your office which your clerk refused.
Tampering with the administration of justice in the manner indisputably shown here involves far more than an injury to a single litigant. It is a wrong against the institutions set up to protect and safeguard the public, institutions in which fraud cannot complacently be tolerated consistently with the good order of society.
The public welfare demands that the agencies of public justice not be so impotent that they must always be the mute and helpless victims of deception and fraud. Surely it cannot be that preservation of the integrity of the judicial process must always wait on the diligence of litigants and demand excessive perseverance.
Take immediate action to review my letter of November 7, 2013. Review the data presented, the court record and issue a decision, or arrange a conference where the information may be presented formally to your office to arrive at a decision.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter. The corrupt actions have left me homeless and destitute since 2011. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Terance Healy
c/o 871 Mustang Road
Warrington, PA 18976
Gary Kline, Director
Domestic Relations Section
P.O. Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404-0311
Dear Mr. Kline,
In response to your letter of November 13, 2013, the Order of the Court to which you refer is a void order issued where the court lacked jurisdiction. The order is a nullity.
The evidence of the defect and lack of jurisdiction is on the court record and listed in the court docket for the matter. Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio lacked jurisdiction and authority to issue the Order of May 9, 2011.
Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is “without authority, it’s judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no jurisdiction; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers.”
[Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)]
The Domestic Relations Office by executing and continuing to execute a void order where informed that you are acting on a void order while refusing and denying the opportunity to address the defective order issued without jurisdiction is a violation of your responsibility, a violation of the law, and a violation of my rights.
Your reply also failed to address the behavior of your staff which demonstrates a complicity to deny justice and deliberately deny access and communication with the Domestic Relations Office. It was clearly not the first time a false allegation was used to remove a litigant from the office without recourse. I remind you I was attempting to simply deliver a letter to your office which your clerk refused.
Tampering with the administration of justice in the manner indisputably shown here involves far more than an injury to a single litigant. It is a wrong against the institutions set up to protect and safeguard the public, institutions in which fraud cannot complacently be tolerated consistently with the good order of society.
The public welfare demands that the agencies of public justice not be so impotent that they must always be the mute and helpless victims of deception and fraud. Surely it cannot be that preservation of the integrity of the judicial process must always wait on the diligence of litigants and demand excessive perseverance.
Take immediate action to review my letter of November 7, 2013. Review the data presented, the court record and issue a decision, or arrange a conference where the information may be presented formally to your office to arrive at a decision.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter. The corrupt actions have left me homeless and destitute since 2011. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Terance Healy
c/o 871 Mustang Road
Warrington, PA 18976
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
Gary Kline - Domestic Relations Office
Dear Mr Healy:
I received your packet of information and letter dated November 7th, 2013. The most recent Order of Court we have is the order dated May 9th, 2011 entered by the Honorable Carolyn Carluccio. APL terminates when the Divorce is Ordered. There are no additional Orders with regard to support that would permit reinstatement at this time.
Sincerely,
Gary Kline
A typical non-responsive letter to the questions asked, while entirely indicative of the reason for their harassment.
So the apparent answer to everything that is wrong is Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio. A defective and void order by a corrupt judge causes the denial of EVERYTHING. And for some reason is the answer to everything. And the reason for no hearings meeting or correspondence. It prevents a letter from being delivered and filed.
The defective and void order which was designed to destroy every ASPECT OF MY LIFE. because without that destructive order, the prior judges corruption would be exposed and prosecuted. Carolyn Carluccio's corrupt actions would void judicial immunity. The deliberate actions of a judge to destroy a person.
THE DEFECTIVE AND VOID ORDER YOU REFER TO HAS BEEN UNDER APPEAL SINCE 2011. BOTH PARTIES HAVE SWORN TO IT BEING INVALID. STOP ENABLING THE TERROR OF CAROLYN CARLUCCIO.
I received your packet of information and letter dated November 7th, 2013. The most recent Order of Court we have is the order dated May 9th, 2011 entered by the Honorable Carolyn Carluccio. APL terminates when the Divorce is Ordered. There are no additional Orders with regard to support that would permit reinstatement at this time.
Sincerely,
Gary Kline
A typical non-responsive letter to the questions asked, while entirely indicative of the reason for their harassment.So the apparent answer to everything that is wrong is Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio. A defective and void order by a corrupt judge causes the denial of EVERYTHING. And for some reason is the answer to everything. And the reason for no hearings meeting or correspondence. It prevents a letter from being delivered and filed.
The defective and void order which was designed to destroy every ASPECT OF MY LIFE. because without that destructive order, the prior judges corruption would be exposed and prosecuted. Carolyn Carluccio's corrupt actions would void judicial immunity. The deliberate actions of a judge to destroy a person.
THE DEFECTIVE AND VOID ORDER YOU REFER TO HAS BEEN UNDER APPEAL SINCE 2011. BOTH PARTIES HAVE SWORN TO IT BEING INVALID. STOP ENABLING THE TERROR OF CAROLYN CARLUCCIO.
Friday, November 8, 2013
Sheriff Eileen Behr
Sheriff Eileen Behr
Montgomery County
Norristown, PA 19404
Sheriff Behr,
Please accept and review the attached letter to Gary Kline about an experience at the Domestic Relations Office on November 7, 2013. County Deputies continue to act on false information from Court personnel.
This issue in the DRO was addressed with Corporal Kohl yesterday. This circumstance was pointed out to he and Corporal Haas years ago. your deputies have recognized that it is the County Personnel who are acting to deny access to the court, to harass, deter and prevent information from being available. The County Personnel are misinforming and using your staff to hinder, undermine and threaten my efforts and my freedom.
I take my freedom and my liberty seriously. The survival of my experience since 2007 in the Courthouse has documented and exposed the criminal sedition of the Pennsylvania Government by judges and lawyers who are unable to address or correct their damage. I have raised the matter in the Federal Courts for myself and on behalf of those who have not survived, baited into jail, forced into homelessness, drugs, isolation and suicide.
The criminal fraudulent conveyance of my home has been documented and proven, yet there has been no action. i remain homeless. Denied access to the District Court by Court Administration. prevented from hearings by Court Administration. Why am I still homeless while the crime is ignored and my home is occupied by people without a valid title to the property. if someone stole a car or a wallet, THAT would have been returned and the crime addressed.
The criminal fraud provided to domestic Relations Office is being ignored. In the past they have denied my rights falsely indicating paperwork was not properly provided to them and served. Their own records demonstrate the files have been deleted. My file is marked CONFIDENTIAL and not available for review.
I remain homeless and destitute and continue to be terrorized and threatened by the harassment and intrusions into my life. I again request your intervention and support. Thank you as always for the professionalism of your deputies.
Sincerely
Terance Healy
Montgomery County
Norristown, PA 19404
Sheriff Behr,
Please accept and review the attached letter to Gary Kline about an experience at the Domestic Relations Office on November 7, 2013. County Deputies continue to act on false information from Court personnel.
This issue in the DRO was addressed with Corporal Kohl yesterday. This circumstance was pointed out to he and Corporal Haas years ago. your deputies have recognized that it is the County Personnel who are acting to deny access to the court, to harass, deter and prevent information from being available. The County Personnel are misinforming and using your staff to hinder, undermine and threaten my efforts and my freedom.
I take my freedom and my liberty seriously. The survival of my experience since 2007 in the Courthouse has documented and exposed the criminal sedition of the Pennsylvania Government by judges and lawyers who are unable to address or correct their damage. I have raised the matter in the Federal Courts for myself and on behalf of those who have not survived, baited into jail, forced into homelessness, drugs, isolation and suicide.
The criminal fraudulent conveyance of my home has been documented and proven, yet there has been no action. i remain homeless. Denied access to the District Court by Court Administration. prevented from hearings by Court Administration. Why am I still homeless while the crime is ignored and my home is occupied by people without a valid title to the property. if someone stole a car or a wallet, THAT would have been returned and the crime addressed.
The criminal fraud provided to domestic Relations Office is being ignored. In the past they have denied my rights falsely indicating paperwork was not properly provided to them and served. Their own records demonstrate the files have been deleted. My file is marked CONFIDENTIAL and not available for review.
I remain homeless and destitute and continue to be terrorized and threatened by the harassment and intrusions into my life. I again request your intervention and support. Thank you as always for the professionalism of your deputies.
Sincerely
Terance Healy
Thursday, November 7, 2013
Gary Kline - Domestic Relations Office
Gary Kline
Domestic Relations Division
Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas
P.O. Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404
Dear Mr. Kline
I attempted before noon today to deliver the attached letter to the Domestic Relations Office (DRO). The treatment I received at the direction of an obese clerk with blond hair and a pink blouse was inexcusable.
When I arrived I proceeded to the check-in folks and asked them to accept a letter and time stamp copies for distribution to the parties. They asked if I had a case number. It was on the letter.
When they looked into their computers, they indicated the file was CONFIDENTIAL. There has never been an explanation ffor my file being confidential. I have been denied access to the file for years without explanation.
The counter person took the letter (and copies) to the back and about 10 minutes later the woman who refused to identify herself indicated I needed to open up a new file. She refused to accept the letter or to time stamp the copies. The counter person then explained to her that I had a PACSES number already. She ignored her. I instructed her this was about delivering a letter to the DRO about an existing case, not initiating a new case.
I asked her to identify herself or contact her supervisor. She ignored me and called the deputies. She falsely indicated she had already given her name. if she had, why would I not have it? or written it? Why would I still be asking for it? Why was she calling the deputies? Why were they saying she had given me her name when they were not there? Why was the delivery of a letter causing such drama? Why was she refusing to provide her name. Even a first name would have been useful. This woman was determined, for no apparent reason, to prevent me from simply delivering a letter and having it time-stamped for distribution to the parties.
In the past no presenting a time-stamped copy of the documents filed with the Domestic Relations Office has been reason for inaction and failure to collect arrears.
As such, I would appreciate your confirmation of the receipt of the attached letter dated November 7, 2013.
I would appreciate the opportunity to review the matter with you and additionally understand why the information in my file is being prevented from me. The DRO activity was initiated on my behalf by my attorney in July 2007.
I would appreciate an opportunity to meet with you to discuss the DRO, discuss my experience, and review and obtain the file contents.
Sincerely
Terance Healy
Domestic Relations Division
Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas
P.O. Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404
Dear Mr. Kline
I attempted before noon today to deliver the attached letter to the Domestic Relations Office (DRO). The treatment I received at the direction of an obese clerk with blond hair and a pink blouse was inexcusable.
When I arrived I proceeded to the check-in folks and asked them to accept a letter and time stamp copies for distribution to the parties. They asked if I had a case number. It was on the letter.
When they looked into their computers, they indicated the file was CONFIDENTIAL. There has never been an explanation ffor my file being confidential. I have been denied access to the file for years without explanation.
The counter person took the letter (and copies) to the back and about 10 minutes later the woman who refused to identify herself indicated I needed to open up a new file. She refused to accept the letter or to time stamp the copies. The counter person then explained to her that I had a PACSES number already. She ignored her. I instructed her this was about delivering a letter to the DRO about an existing case, not initiating a new case.
I asked her to identify herself or contact her supervisor. She ignored me and called the deputies. She falsely indicated she had already given her name. if she had, why would I not have it? or written it? Why would I still be asking for it? Why was she calling the deputies? Why were they saying she had given me her name when they were not there? Why was the delivery of a letter causing such drama? Why was she refusing to provide her name. Even a first name would have been useful. This woman was determined, for no apparent reason, to prevent me from simply delivering a letter and having it time-stamped for distribution to the parties.
In the past no presenting a time-stamped copy of the documents filed with the Domestic Relations Office has been reason for inaction and failure to collect arrears.
As such, I would appreciate your confirmation of the receipt of the attached letter dated November 7, 2013.
I would appreciate the opportunity to review the matter with you and additionally understand why the information in my file is being prevented from me. The DRO activity was initiated on my behalf by my attorney in July 2007.
I would appreciate an opportunity to meet with you to discuss the DRO, discuss my experience, and review and obtain the file contents.
Sincerely
Terance Healy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)