As i was preparing documents for a Superior Court Appeal, I discovered that my civil rights have been denied deliberately... I still cannot understand how this has happened. This post has been left in place intentionally. The assembly of scattered information which demonstrated, necessitated and evolved into The Constitutional Challenge.
Pennsylvania Legislature and Judiciary is not the government you think...
Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct is unconstitutional to Pro Se litigants.
The rule causes the complete denial of all state and all federally protected constitutional rights, civil rights etc.
Efforts to observe the Rule results in the complete and absolute obstruction of justice for Pro Se litigants. It further obligates every legal professional to ignore any effort to address any reported violation of ethics, professional rules.
The Rule must be suspended in all matters relating to Pro Se litigants, as a 'fault' can be intentionally initiated by a represented party to undermine the Pro Se litigant and result in the complete failure of the judicial and legal system with no recourse or recovery.
The Rule has a built in self defense mechanism which prevents lawyers from taking any effort to change it.
I am not a lawyer.
As a Pro Se Defendant, the Rule is unconstitutional for me and void.
Has the unconstitutionality of 1.6 been addressed?
I will find it very difficult to accept that the entire legal profession was unable to identify this situation because, as lawyers, the Rule is constitutional and valid. It prevents itself from ever being addressed.
It cannot be possible that extreme injustice was occurring everyday and Rule 1.6 prevented anyone from ever addressing it.
EXAMINING THE LOCK ON 1.6
- The moment it was made into law, it became untouchable.
- (Paraphrasing 1.6) Lawyers are prohibited from exposing the crimes of lawyers and judges.
- (Paraphrasing 1.6) Judges are prohibited from exposing the crimes of lawyers and judges.
As the legislature is made up of lawyers, they are precluded from changing the law, or taking any action which could lead to the changing of the law.
How do you correct RULE 1.6, when the only people who can make the correction, pass the law, suspend the law, are prevented from taking any action with regard to the Rule.
How do you get around a law which cannot be changed? YOU LOOK. 8 Years of Injustice. Easy one.
Alert the media, THIS IS NOT AT ALL WHAT I EXPECTED TO DETERMINE.
- A legislature which passes a law with the express purpose of denying constitutional rights to a segment of society?
- The resultant denial of all rights - constitutional, civil, parental, human - requires one element to make it work. - It requires the judge to participate.
The legislature has passed this RULE which prevents any correction as a lawyer can not have anything to do with the correction.So who legislated the deliberate perpetual inescapable destruction of Pro Se litigants?
I went to Harrisburg because 1.6 was a TURD that needed flushed.
I wanted to meet the author and suggest a change to the Rule which denied me ALL OF MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
I went to see RULES and requested a suggestion for the proper format to present the proposed change.
That RULE was not written in Harrisburg by our elected legislative branch.
THAT RULE IS THE SAME BEING USED IN MANY OTHER STATES.
A demonstration of a level of corruption and conspiracy so pervasive that you I could not possibly have anticipated.
Even after the injustice I have experienced at so many levels.
Is the American Bar Association really that intimidated by Pro Se litigants that they would draft a Rule which causes their destruction? the complete loss of constitutional rights?
MANIPULATED INTO A LIABILITY... The entire Government of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
It will be clear who caused it, allowed it, or compelled it, or corrupted the entire government.
Because the law revision dates show a gap. In 2005, this series of laws were enacted.
During that time the Chief Law Enforcement Officer in Pa was Tom Corbett.
I cannot fathom what the hell kind of explanation could exist, but why has the American Bar Association completely subverted the law causing the complete denial of rights of Pro Se litigants?
I've already stumbled on the scripts they have provided which are used by the judiciary to twist their court orders into whatever they like based on nonesense and random use of 1.6.
Time permitting I'll check what other laws have locked which appear to be programatic. Let's see what the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION has destroyed.
KATHLEEN KANE.... CAN I PLEASE GET A MEETING WITH YOU BEFORE THEY KILL ME?
These lawyers have been giggling at my suffering through injustice for the last 7 years.
Todd Stephens?? Kate Harper?? Stewart Greenleaf?? Seriously??? What do you have to say
Have I assembled the entire team who has been terrorizing me yet? I have said so many times, it is not about divorce it is about destruction, but I could never have truly believed that the entire PA Government and Judiciary were truly involved. What has happened to the USA?
(Based on the documents which are prevented from being printed/displayed, my hackers have provided necessary information. And self identified. Thank you.
So who legislated the deliberate perpetual inescapable destruction of Pro Se litigants?
I am going to review the edits in the lawbooks. It best not be called SkyNet, .
As the Rule, The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land.
The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be In agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:
The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it's enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it.
An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.
Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it.....
A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the lend, it is superseded thereby.
Please indicate if your State has rules which require lawyers to maintain confidentiality with regard to misdeeds by lawyers and judges.
The Pennsylvania Rule 1.6 creates an adverse position for the Pro Se defendant as lawyers may not exchange information regarding professional and ethical violations with the Pro Se Litigant.
When A Pro Se litigant reports an injustice, the investigating lawyer may not communicate any information with the Pro Se litigant as it violates the rule. This can result in the actual denial of all rights, OR the appearance of the denial of all rights, with no ability to Appeal or recourse to address the situation as those to whom the appeal is escalated must also follow the rule.
In a final twist, I suppose the correction has not been made because a lawyer may not put the correction in place as that would be a violation of the rule.
I will have more on this later. Read this post for more background. The Document may seem a bit incomplete. I was editing the post when I realized the unconstitutionality of the law. This situation has destroyed so many people I stopped the edit and have begun to prepare Information, Rule Change Requests and documents to file to suspend the Rule for my specific case.
I am preparing a Mandamus Petition to suspend the Rule for all participants for the duration of my matter and retroactively to the initial filings on the matter.
I am uncertain as to why the Rule of Professional Conduct has stood for so long while adversely affecting Pro Se litigant who have been destroyed by it's influence.
Conceptually, any attorney who would present, prepare and produce this document would be violating the Rule and be subject to disciplinary action. Any lawyer taking any effort to address this Rule would be effectively violating the Rule and unable to proceed.
Why this state rule is taking precedence over all others remains to be determined.
I am hoping this revelation prevents any future, destruction of Pro Se litigant in Family Court.
I could use some help preparing that Federal Lawsuit.
I have an Brief which must be filed this month. I must suspend the Rule for the Superior Court Judiciary to have the freedom to communicate the appeal issues with me. If Rule 1.6 is not suspended, The Superior Court cannot address issues of the appeal as they will affect the integrity and reputation of the judiciary.
PERSEVERE!!!!!
I still cannot understand how this has happened. Pennsylvania Legislature and Judiciary is not the government you think... The Judicial Branch has taken over the country... and the only way to identify and realize it is to read through the above. It is my thought process though and I was only discovering myself as I sorted through the info in order.
It gets a little sci-fi at this point., I am not a sci-fi author.
To get here, I have endured the taunts. I survived. I had no idea. Save the ineffective taunts, I am over them.
I don't yet know who else knows what I have learned.
The Judicial Branch has taken over the State Government of Pennsylvania and many other states.
The take over started on January 1, 2005. On that day the Rules Of Professional Conduct was revised for the first time since April 1, 1988.
REMEMBER: Ray Gricar, Centre County District Attorney, has been missing April 15, 2005.
The people I met in Harrisburg the other day were not aware of the damage that Rule 1.6 had done to me.
When I left, they understood who I was, what had happened to me, and that 1.6 was the problem I went to expose, address and change.
While, I found it odd that they really had no idea. There was no sense that they were hiding anything. They were cordial, friendly and willing to listen and relay the message to their.
As far as I know there are only 3 possible people who may have known what I have just discovered.
Tom Corbett, Governor
Kathleen Kane, Attorney General
And One Other.
There are now people all over the world who are seeing this. Surely some are rolling their eyes.
Others are probably thinking does this explain the craziest divorce story ever?Some had recently changed their opinion of my 'life'after Edward Snowden.
Edward, were you about to tell the world the US Government has been overthrown and was now under the full absolute control of the Judicial Branch.
From here it is clear that Pennsylvania, and the other states, have the ability to destroy and attack peoples lives, and no matter how unjust, or how much they beg from help at all levels of government, their destruction persists unstoppable. AND NO ONE HELPS.
Rule 1.6 has given the Judicial Branch of Government full and absolute control of everything.
The trigger for any persons destruction MUST be an improper action by a judge.
From that point forward, the targeted person is heading toward destruction.
If you had a lawyer, the lawyer cannot do anything which reveals the misdeed of the judge, so you cannot be saved. Your life can only be extended. You will end up Pro Se, without rights, and completely ignored by a society that has no clue that Pro Se litigants are denied all Constitutional Rights.
There is no resolving it, there is no escaping it. Rule 1.6 prevents that.
Apparently I know the secret to survival.
No comments:
Post a Comment