Deliberate Judicial Injustice

The injustice began with the issuing of the secret order (undocketed, undistributed to Terance Healy) by Judge Rhonda Daniele in August 2007.

Judge Dickman was not likely aware of the secret order. Judge Dickman’s notes on an Agreed Order indicated her anticipation for vexatious litigation by Angst & Angst. Judge Dickman died in late 2007.

Judge Ott reviewed considerable documentation and evidence and issued a Protection from Abuse order with regard to the technology intruding into computers, phones and networking equipment.

Judge Tilson dismissed The Protection from Abuse order regarding technology intrusions of computers, phones and networking equipment.

Judge DelRicci failed to enforce Sonya Healy’s compliance, or sanction her contempt of ANY AND EVERY court order.

Judge DelRicci incarcerated me for contempt of an order which had not yet been before a judge, or signed by any judge.

Judge Del Ricci participated directly in the conspiracy to conceal the secret order, and prevent the scheduling of custody proceedings.

Judge Del Ricci intervened with the police, county detectives and the District Attorneys Office to prevent Sonya Healy, and 20 others (including the parties children) from being prosecuted for breaking and entering, and burglary in defiance of an Agreed Court Order and misrepresenting to police that the ‘secret order’ authorized her to have access to the house.

Judge DelRicci prevented custody or visitation, delayed custody proceedings, issued ex parte orders without holding proceedings, and then recused himself while threatening me with litigation accusing me of liable and slander on the internet. (He never produced the offending document.)

Judge DelRicci neglected enforcement or excused compliance by Sonya Healy of any discovery order which would reveal her technology intrusions.

Judge Tilson issued several ex parte custody orders without holding or scheduling any proceedings and threatening incarceration should I take any action to prevent my son from leaving the United States alone – even where his orders were contrary to procedure, state and federal law, and the Hague Convention.

Judge Bertin manipulated the pleadings, delayed scheduling of hearings, and issued orders which caused criminal actions to be ‘not cognizable’ once they were no longer a part of the family court pleading from which it was split.

Judge Bertin failed to enforce Sonya Healy’s compliance, or sanction her contempt of ANY AND EVERY court order.

Judge Coonahan refused to act on Emergency Petitions, failed to enforce Sonya Healy’s compliance, or sanction her contempt of ANY AND EVERY court order, or to schedule any proceedings while the case was assigned to her.

Judge Barrett showed such extreme disrespect that his recusal was requested after the first hearing before him. It was granted.

Judge Carluccio took me for a complete fool who would believe everything she said no matter how preposterous.

Judge Carluccio failed to enforce Sonya Healy’s compliance, or sanction her contempt of ANY AND EVERY court order.

Whenever she realized that I was prepared for emergency hearings and had filed hearing statements, she would continue the proceedings; then, repeatedly reschedule in anticipation that I might not appear and the petitions would be dismissed for non-appearance. As a result, I had to be prepared for any and all of 15 petitions which had been outstanding and unheard for over a year.

When I appeared for an uncancelled hearing, based on an Order to Appear, Depuities were provided a false report of a threat. Opposing counsel and parties failed to appear after having indicated their understanding that the hearing was not cancelled in a letter to the court.

Judge Carluccio was corrupt and manipulative from her first action.

Judge Carluccio refused to recuse and was determined to do damage.

As the President of the Montgomery County Bar Association, Judge Carluccio always concealed the deliberate errors and misconduct of lawyers in her court – even where the lawyers actions caused the court to not have proper jurisdiction.

Judge Carluccio prevented the Appeal from delivery to Superior Court of Philadelphia.

Judge Haaz upon realizing that he had no jurisdiction for the hearing, ended the proceeding and instructed Court Administration to schedule it.

Judge Coonhan failed to schedule any proceeding while assigned the case.

Judge Page was assigned the case in December 2012. Though the court lacked jurisdiction while an appeal was pending in the Superior Court, Judge Page ordered the proceeding to occur.

Judge Page rescheduled the proceeding just about every day for a period of a month. An attempt to confuse and prevent the scheduling of witnesses.

Judge Page indicated during the hearing that I had plenty of time to schedule witnesses to appear even though he had only scheduled the proceeding the night before.

Judge Page ignored that he did not have proper jurisdiction to conduct a hearing.

Judge Page ignored the evidence of the defective divorce decree.

Judge Page ignored that there had been no evidence of contempt. Though Judge Carluccio’s orders were defective and void, I followed the orders.

Where orders were issued part on paper and part on the court record/transcript, Judge Page lacked documentation of the judge’s complete order.

Judge Page instead chose to issue an absurd order for over $300,000 in penalties for contempt to a party kept unemployed by years of constant litigation, and made destitute and homeless by judicial corruption and lawlessness.

The Montgomery County Judiciary continued to ignore their complete disregard for the law.

When seeking to appeal Judge Page’s Order, there was not one judge in the courthouse willing to hear the Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. There had been multiple IFP’s filed over the years, each was ignored without proceedings.

Judge Wall having failed to issue any decision after two proceedings.

The judiciary was content that they had left me destitute and homeless and had deliberately perpetrated the disposal of everything I owned.

Judge Austin left me standing in the hallway outside her court for hours while she entertained guests in her courtroom, only to send out a member of her staff to indicate she would not conduct the IFP hearing.

At the end of the long day, Judge Page signed the IFP. The Appeal moved forward. Transcripts were ordered.

Once the Concise statement was delivered to his chambers, Judge Page revoked the IFP without any proceeding or explanation, further instructing the Court Reporters to NOT produce the transcripts.

To Appeal THAT corrupt and void order would require a judge to approve a new IFP. A new IFP must be filed for every action. Apparently, the fact that I was destitute and homeless and terrorized by litigation since 2007, was no reason to stop the injustice.

It became very clear that there was no denying that the corruption and injustice of the Montgomery County Judiciary was meant to compel my suicide. Something which I was not capable of delivering.

The County then failed to send the complete court records to the Superior Court. Even the exhibits from the proceeding before Judge Page were NOT included. The Superior Court denied a motion to compel without explanation. The Supreme Court would do the same. Even if they issued a Mandamus Order for the court to provide the paperwork, the lower court could refuse… BECAUSE TO PROVIDE THE COURT RECORD OF THE EXTREME INJUSTICE EXPERIENCED ON THE RECORD WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIARY.

I sent a short letter to the Judiciary of Montgomery County asking the direct question, “WHAT THE F%&K IS WRONG WITH YOU?” There was no response from any judge to the question.

In July 2013, I discovered the undocumented power (and purpose) of Rule 1.6 – Confidentiality of Information.

Rule 1.6 was rolled out by the American Bar Association and enacted to prevent the prosecution of judges for judicial corruption and injustice. To protect the integrity of the Cook County Courts reeling from the sting of the FBI’s OPERATION GREYLORD, the AMA would undermine the judiciary in every state with the LAW which further MANDATED the compliciteness and participation of EVERY lawyer.

LAWYERS CANNOT FIX THE RULE 1.6 INJUSTICE. RULE 1.6 PREVENTS IT.

Each state Supreme Court aggressively enforces Rule 1.6. The state policy even conceals the entire situation where a lawyer admits to the violation and submits to the discipline – there is no publication, or public record of the lawyers violation of the rules of professional conduct. Where a case has been undermined by unethical and unscrupulous lawyers, all the lawyer need to do is admit it (in private) and they are permitted to continue the injustice… CONFIDENTIALITY.

The lawyers may then proceed further with complete disregard for due process and procedures, and the injustice continues with a judge trying to conceal the deliberate misconduct of the attorneys in the case. For example, Judge Page holding a hearing without jurisdiction while the matter is with the Superior Court. The failure to permit the first Appeal (August 2011)to proceed causes the corruption to continue, and to grow.

Healy v Healy includes more corrupt judges and courthouse personnel than the FBI’s Operation Greylord prosecuted and jailed.

The Courts were all hiding behind Rule 1.6 and preventing evidence and obstructing justice. The courts could ignore every law, procedure, constitution, etc by writing fiction in their Orders and Opinions.

It became necessary to address the loss of constitutionally protected rights. The loss was clearly evident without delving into the full story once the matter had arrived in Superior Court.

After the deadline for an Answer had passed for the Pennsylvania Attorney General and it was clear that the 56 state Attorneys General would default to restore people’s constitutional rights nationwide, a unexplained and unexcused late filing under an improper title was filed by an attoerney electronically without a signature purportedly on behalf of Attorney General Kathleen Kane.

The Eastern District Court follows Rule 1.6 as enacted by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

Attorney General Kathleen Kane could not violate the confidentiality of an employee in her office. As her staff are her clients, she is mandated to maintain confidentiality of information. EVEN WHERE HER LAWFUL AND CONSTITUTIONAL ACTION TO DEFAULT HAS BEEN UNDERMINED… and would further undermine the matter for the other 55 Attorneys General who have also defaulted in the matter.

The integrity of the Eastern District Judge was sacrificed as he failed to substantiate his decisions based on fiction and misinformation. Rule 1.6?s MANDATE of confidentiality had undermined it’s own constitutional challenge.

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals follows Rule 1.6 as enacted by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

In affirming the dismissal the Third Circuit panel neglected to present any facts which would support their decision. Their integrity was sacrificed pursuant to Rule 1.6 to conceal the injustice caused by Rule 1.6.

The Constitutional Challenge is currently being presented to President Barack Obama and the United States Congress concurrently with submission to the Supreme Court of the United States. A necessity as SCOTUS may not be lawfully permitted to address the corruption which the state judiciaries have caused IN EVERY STATE.

The Weilheimer Opinion

Judge Gail Weilheimer has finally written her long delayed Opinion in Healy v Miller.

Thank You to Judge Weilheimer for demonstrating the Rule 1.6 impact so cleanly.

In the judge's seven page opinion, Judge Weilheimer presents the techniques used by judges nationwide in the delivery of injustice and denial of facts, misdirected rule of law, and blindness to constitutional rights.

DO THESE JUDGES THINK THEY ARE FOOLING ANYONE?
THIS 'GAME' BEING PLAYED IS AT THE EXPENSE OF MY LIFE, MY FAMILY, MY LIBERTY.
CLEARLY, The judges DO NOT CARE about you, your family, the law, their integrity, your dignity, their lack of self-respect, your life, your liberty, their abuse of power, your civil rights, your human rights.

Rule 1.6 mandates concealing their corruption and injustice... and THAT IS WHAT THEY DO.

In their arrogance, they fail to address their fault and their responsibility for causing a nationwide constitutional crisis in the United States, while preventing any resolution to the sedition by the American Bar Association which has undermined the authority of every court in the country.

---

The initial complaint (Healy v Miller) was to have been filed in Montgomery Township in August 2013.

This filing was prevented by the Administrator for that court when she interrupted the proceeding, took the papers directly from Judge Andrea Duffy's hands, and returned them to me indicating I should leave. As the judge had never before seen behavior like this from an Administrator, I requested the opportunity to explain. This is how a person is treated when they have no rights and no protection of the law.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 was included as part of the documents submitted to the court. Judge Duffy had just experienced the affect of Rule 1.6. I informed her that as an American she cannot imagine being without her constitutional rights, and that was why she was unable to recognize and identify and explain the actions of her administrator.

What Judge Duffy had witnessed was a denial of access to the courts, and a prevention of any recourse for grievances. By procedure and Pennsylvania law, the Administrator could have forwarded the matter to the Common Pleas Court in Norristown. Instead, she interrupted a hearing, caused needless drama, involved the police. prevented other district court office personnel from action, and attempted to intimidate and threaten a litigant. Judge Duffy watched the judicial process being undermined in her own courtroom. The Administrator following instructions from Norristown to prevent or end any proceeding in the District Court.

The only way for a judge to maintain their integrity when Rule 1.6 is 'in play' is to do nothing. This has been demonstrated by Judge Haaz, and by Judge Boylan in Bucks County.

The complaint was filed October 3, 2013 in the Common Pleas Court.

[FIVE MONTHS LATER]

The hearing took place on March 5, 2014 with Judge Weilheimer ruling immediately at the end of the hearing.

The Appeal was filed on March 6, 2014.

Concise Statement was ordered and served upon the judge on March 27, 2014.

[THREE MONTHS LATER]

A Motion to Compel the Opinion was filed in June 2014, and ignored.

The Montgomery County Prothonotary had once again not sent the case file and court record to the Superior Court.

On July 1, 2014, The Superior Court of Pennsylvania sent a letter requesting the Opinion and case files from Montgomery County.

On July 14, 2014, The Motion to Strike A Defective and Void Order was filed with the Superior Court and served on the Miller's and their attorney.

On July 18, 2014, Judge Weilheimer issued her Opinion.

Let's count the ways in which Judge Weilheimer has twisted her words to conceal the truth. The truly offensive part is that the courts deliberate neglect shows carelessness and disregard for the litigants, the law, and the facts.

The court has been provided another opportunity to address the lack of jurisdiction which the court has IGNORED since June 2011. Over 75 times, the court has IGNORED the defective and void order issued without jurisdiction. Clearly, a litigant cannot cause the judicairy to be just and honest once a case has been corrupted pursuant to Rule 1.6.

NOTE TO COURT: The Plaintiff is very aware of what has occurred and the malicious intent of Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio. The responsibility to inform the court of the defective order so that the Court could take action to address the defect was met and presented repeatedly. While the court neglected its responsibility and perpetrated additional injustice, the litigant was denied the protection of the law, rights and privileges secured by the Constitution of the United States, and mistreated with tremendous disrespect while his life, liberty and property were being unlawfully destroyed.

QUESTION:
WHY HAS NO ONE PRESENTED ANY INFORMATION WHICH DEMONSTRATES THE ELEMENTS OF JURISDICTION NECESSARY FOR THE COURT TO ISSUE A DIVORCE DECREE?

ANSWER:
THE COURT LACKED JURISDICTION. THE ORDER IS VOID AB INITIO.

PROBLEM:
WHERE JURISDICTION DID NOT EXIST, THERE IS NO ABILITY TO ASSERT JURISDICTION RETROACTIVELY.

The actions of Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio were not judicial, and are not excused by judicial immunity. The refusal to address the malicious abuse of power under color of law initiated by Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio further executed and denied review by county personnel is well documented.

Those actions demonstrate a conspiracy within the court involving extrinsic and intrinsic fraud which also affects the immunity of the prior judges who have acted improperly in this matter.

The injustice began with the issuing of the secret order (undocketed, undistributed to Terance Healy) by Judge Rhonda Daniele in August 2007. Judge Dickman was not likely aware of the secret order. Judge Dickman's notes on an Agreed Order indicated her anticipation for vexatious litigation by Angst & Angst. Judge Dickman died in late 2007. Judge Ott reviewed considerable documentation and evidence and issued a Protection from Abuse order with regard to the technology intruding into computers, phones and networking equipment. Judge Tilson dismissed The Protection from Abuse order regarding technology intrusions of computers, phones and networking equipment. Judge DelRicci failed to enforce Sonya Healy's compliance, or sanction her contempt of ANY AND EVERY court order. Judge DelRicci incarcerated me for contempt of an order which had not yet been before a judge, or signed by any judge. Judge Del Ricci participated directly in the conspiracy to conceal the secret order, and prevent the scheduling of custody proceedings. Judge Del Ricci intervened with the police, county detectives and the District Attorneys Office to prevent Sonya Healy, and 20 others (including the parties children) from being prosecuted for breaking and entering, and burglary in defiance of an Agreed Court Order and misrepresenting to police that the 'secret order' authorized her to have access to the house. Judge DelRicci prevented custody or visitation, delayed custody proceedings, issued ex parte orders without holding proceedings, and then recused himself while threatening me with litigation accusing me of liable and slander on the internet. (He never produced the offending document.) Judge DelRicci neglected enforcement or excused compliance by Sonya Healy of any discovery order which would reveal her technology intrusions. Judge Tilson issued several ex parte custody orders without holding or scheduling any proceedings and threatening incarceration should I take any action to prevent my son from leaving the United States alone - even where his orders were contrary to procedure, state and federal law, and the Hague Convention. Judge Bertin manipulated the pleadings, delayed scheduling of hearings, and issued orders which caused criminal actions to be 'not cognizable' once they were no longer a part of the family court pleading from which it was split. Judge Bertin failed to enforce Sonya Healy's compliance, or sanction her contempt of ANY AND EVERY court order. Judge Coonahan refused to act on Emergency Petitions, failed to enforce Sonya Healy's compliance, or sanction her contempt of ANY AND EVERY court order, or to schedule any proceedings while the case was assigned to her. Judge Barrett showed such extreme disrespect that his recusal was requested after the first hearing before him. It was granted. Judge Carluccio took me for a complete fool who would believe everything she said no matter how preposterous. Judge Carluccio failed to enforce Sonya Healy's compliance, or sanction her contempt of ANY AND EVERY court order. Whenever she realized that I was prepared for emergency hearings and had filed hearing statements, she would continue the proceedings; then, repeatedly reschedule in anticipation that I might not appear and the petitions would be dismissed for non-appearance. As a result, I had to be prepared for any and all of 15 petitions which had been outstanding and unheard for over a year. When I appeared for an uncancelled hearing, based on an Order to Appear, Depuities were provided a false report of a threat. Opposing counsel and parties failed to appear after having indicated their understanding that the hearing was not cancelled in a letter to the court. Judge Carluccio was corrupt and manipulative from her first action. Judge Carluccio refused to recuse and was determined to do damage. As the President of the Montgomery County Bar Association, Judge Carluccio always concealed the deliberate errors and misconduct of lawyers in her court - even where the lawyers actions caused the court to not have proper jurisdiction. Judge Carluccio prevented the Appeal from delivery to Superior Court of Philadelphia. Judge Haaz upon realizing that he had no jurisdiction for the hearing, ended the proceeding and instructed Court Administration to schedule it. Judge Coonhan failed to schedule any proceeding while assigned the case. Judge Page was assigned the case in December 2012. Though the court lacked jurisdiction while an appeal was pending in the Superior Court, Judge Page ordered the proceeding to occur. Judge Page rescheduled the proceeding just about every day for a period of a month. An attempt to confuse and prevent the scheduling of witnesses. Judge Page indicated during the hearing that I had plenty of time to schedule witnesses to appear even though he had only scheduled the proceeding the night before. Judge Page ignored that he did not have proper jurisdiction to conduct a hearing. Judge Page ignored the evidence of the defective divorce decree. Judge Page ignored that there had been no evidence of contempt. Though Judge Carluccio's orders were defective and void, I followed the orders. Where orders were issued part on paper and part on the court record/transcript, Judge Page lacked documentation of the judge's complete order. Judge Page instead chose to issue an absurd order for over $300,000 in penalties for contempt to a party kept unemployed by years of constant litigation, and made destitute and homeless by judicial corruption and lawlessness. The Montgomery County Judiciary continued to ignore their complete disregard for the law. When seeking to appeal Judge Page's Order, there was not one judge in the courthouse willing to hear the Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. There had been multiple IFP's filed over the years, each was ignored without proceedings. Judge Wall having failed to issue any decision after two proceedings. The judiciary was content that they had left me destitute and homeless and had deliberately perpetrated the disposal of everything I owned. Judge Austin left me standing in the hallway outside her court for hours while she entertained guests in her courtroom, only to send out a member of her staff to indicate she would not conduct the IFP hearing. At the end of the long day, Judge Page signed the IFP. The Appeal moved forward. Transcripts were ordered. Once the Concise statement was delivered to his chambers, Judge Page revoked the IFP without any proceeding or explanation, further instructing the Court Reporters to NOT produce the transcripts. To Appeal THAT corrupt and void order would require a judge to approve a new IFP. A new IFP must be filed for every action. Apparently, the fact that I was destitute and homeless and terrorized by litigation since 2007, was no reason to stop the injustice. It became very clear that there was no denying that the corruption and injustice of the Montgomery County Judiciary was meant to compel my suicide. Something which I was not capable of delivering. The County then failed to send the complete court records to the Superior Court. Even the exhibits from the proceeding before Judge Page were NOT included. The Superior Court denied a motion to compel without explanation. The Supreme Court would do the same. Even if they issued a Mandamus Order for the court to provide the paperwork, the lower court could refuse... BECAUSE TO PROVIDE THE COURT RECORD OF THE EXTREME INJUSTICE EXPERIENCED ON THE RECORD WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIARY. I sent a short letter to the Judiciary of Montgomery County asking the direct question, "WHAT THE F%&K IS WRONG WITH YOU?" There was no response from any judge to the question. In July 2013, I discovered the undocumented power (and purpose) of Rule 1.6 - Confidentiality of Information. Rule 1.6 was rolled out by the American Bar Association and enacted to prevent the prosecution of judges for judicial corruption and injustice. To protect the integrity of the Cook County Courts reeling from the sting of the FBI's OPERATION GREYLORD, the AMA would undermine the judiciary in every state with the LAW which further MANDATED the compliciteness and participation of EVERY lawyer. LAWYERS CANNOT FIX THE RULE 1.6 INJUSTICE. RULE 1.6 PREVENTS IT. Each state Supreme Court aggressively enforces Rule 1.6. The state policy even conceals the entire situation where a lawyer admits to the violation and submits to the discipline - there is no publication, or public record of the lawyers violation of the rules of professional conduct. Where a case has been undermined by unethical and unscrupulous lawyers, all the lawyer need to do is admit it (in private) and they are permitted to continue the injustice... CONFIDENTIALITY. The lawyers may then proceed further with complete disregard for due process and procedures, and the injustice continues with a judge trying to conceal the deliberate misconduct of the attorneys in the case. For example, Judge Page holding a hearing without jurisdiction while the matter is with the Superior Court. The failure to permit the first Appeal (August 2011)to proceed causes the corruption to continue, and to grow. Healy v Healy includes more corrupt judges and courthouse personnel than the FBI's Operation Greylord prosecuted and jailed. The Courts were all hiding behind Rule 1.6 and preventing evidence and obstructing justice. The courts could ignore every law, procedure, constitution, etc by writing fiction in their Orders and Opinions. It became necessary to address the loss of constitutionally protected rights. The loss was clearly evident without delving into the full story once the matter had arrived in Superior Court. After the deadline for an Answer had passed for the Pennsylvania Attorney General and it was clear that the 56 state Attorneys General would default to restore people's constitutional rights nationwide, a unexplained and unexcused late filing under an improper title was filed by an attoerney electronically without a signature purportedly on behalf of Attorney General Kathleen Kane. The Eastern District Court follows Rule 1.6 as enacted by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. Attorney General Kathleen Kane could not violate the confidentiality of an employee in her office. As her staff are her clients, she is mandated to maintain confidentiality of information. EVEN WHERE HER LAWFUL AND CONSTITUTIONAL ACTION TO DEFAULT HAS BEEN UNDERMINED... and would further undermine the matter for the other 55 Attorneys General who have also defaulted in the matter. The integrity of the Eastern District Judge was sacrificed as he failed to substantiate his decisions based on fiction and misinformation. Rule 1.6's MANDATE of confidentiality had undermined it's own constitutional challenge. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals follows Rule 1.6 as enacted by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. In affirming the dismissal the Third Circuit panel neglected to present any facts which would support their decision. Their integrity was sacrificed pursuant to Rule 1.6 to conceal the injustice caused by Rule 1.6. The Constitutional Challenge is currently being presented to President Barack Obama and the United States Congress concurrently with submission to the Supreme Court of the United States. A necessity as SCOTUS may not be lawfully permitted to address the corruption which the state judiciaries have caused IN EVERY STATE.

If you find the experience in the above box exhausting to read, you must understand that the above is only the biggest of the injustices delivered by each judge. The indiginities suffered while they annihilated my life, liberty and any happiness have terrorized every minute of every hour of every day since 2007 without any break. This web site documents much of the injustice of the experience, BUT it is by no means a complete listing. In all sincerity, even typing the summary above tears at my spirit and causes me to relive the most horrific years of my life while still not knowing when the courts will address their own corruption.

The Bottom line is Judge Weilheimer completely neglects to address the lack of jurisdiction for the Court to issue the Order of May 9, 2011.

Judge Weilheimer completely neglects to address the uncontested and unrefuted testimony in her court which demonstrated the lack of jurisdiction.

Judge Weilheimer completely neglects to address the lack of jurisdiction while ignoring the rule of law, precedents and case law which exist in state and federal courts.

The clear demonstration of her lack of integrity, the recently elected and sworn to office in January 2014, Judge Weilheimer presents that after less than 2 months serving on the Montgomery County bench she would deny a litigant justice in spite of overwhelming evidence and facts already on the court record to conceal the corruption of the Montgomery County judiciary.

Shameful. The only possible redemption would be for her to come out publicly in support of the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6. The challenge was filed to restore the integrity of the judiciary. For Gail Weilheimer, there may be hope. By her own choice, Rule 1.6 stole her integrity.

Would she have the courage to regain some self-respect by preserving protecting and defending the Constitution of the United States.

For Rhonda Daniele and Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio, their malice and terroristic injustice designed to cause my suicide show they lack any inclination towards redemption.

The rest in varying degrees are in a similar situation. Judge Page crafted the proceeding in his court to deliver an injustice which could put me in jail to pay off over $300,000 in contempt charges. No amount of time in his twisted church will lessen the terror his injustice has caused to me, and to others.

JUSTICE IS COMING. Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct is UNCONSTITUTIONAL in that it denies litigants of their rights under the Constitution of the United States. It diminishes the victim to being destitute, homeless and forced to suffer continuing injustices.

Judge Garrett Page = Abuse of Power / Intimidation / Conspiracy

Judge Garret Page issued an enforcement order for payment of over $300,000 to a Defendant who had been unemployed since 2007 and left homeless by a void order while failing to address the lack of jurisdiction of the void order based on a void based on a void defective order.

On Appeal, Judge Page initially ignored the Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. After an entire day of judges refusing to hearing the IFP, Judge Page granted the petition. Judge Page then requested a concise statement of issued being raised on appeal. Upon being provided with that listing, Judge Page (without jurisdiction) revoked the IFP. There was no hearing. There was no explanation.

When asked for a hearing / explanation. Judge Page denied petitions for the same.

Unable to appeal a denial of an IFP because the Prothonotary would not accept an Appeal without an IFP. Judge Page intentionally issued orders without jurisdiction knowing there would be no way around his actions.

Judge Page, with full knowledge of what was being challenged in the Appeal, then contacted the court reporters and instructed them to NOT provide the transcripts for the hearings required for the Appeal to proceed. Judge Page was intimidating at least one of the court reporters who regularly worked with him. THAT reporter also neglected to submit exhibits along with previously transcribed transcripts.

Judge Page is acting to prevent the Appeal of his order, because it exposes the denial of access to the courts and the denial of an Appeal filed on August 15, 2011. That Appeal was blocked by Judge Carolyn Carluccio. Who refused to hear the IFP at that time, while acknoweledging the appeal and preventing transcripts from being produced at that time. At the time Defendant was appealing a defective divorce decree which left Defendant homeless and disposed of ALL of his property while conspiring with the Plaintiff and her attorneys to deny and delay hearings.

This all occurs after 8 years of divorce litigation where the Defendant has been denied prompt custody hearings, and denied any enforcement actions against the Plaintiff. Causing the Defendant to be in tremendous debt, and not being permitted to see his children for years.

Prior Complaints to the JCB have been ignored, not investigated and summarily dismissed while the judiciary continues to terrorize the Defendant. All actions designed to conceal the initial malicious order, kept secret for 3 years, issued by Judge Rhonda Daniele without hearing, without being distributed to the Defendant, and without ever meeting with the Defendant. That SECRET Order was used to leverage the judges to misdeed, which once discovered and documented resulted in their prompt recusal and the injustice being moved to the next judge's courtroom.


8 Years.

18 Judges.

ONE TERRORISTIC DIVORCE.

The inescapable injustice is documented.

Judge Garrett Page: criminal abuse of power under color of law

Judge Garrett Page was provided the opportunity to not accept the assignment of this matter. He chose poorly.

I had questioned the reassignment of the case from Judge Haaz.
EMERGENCY OBJECTION TO THE REASSIGNMENT OF THIS MATTER / PETITION TO ENFORCE THE SCHEDULING ORDER OF JULY 10, 2012

Judge Page came into the matter with more advance information than any other judge since 2007.

Judge Page was offended by my Objection to the Reassignment. I explained to him that it was not personal. 1) There had been no reason provided for Judge Haaz not holding the hearing he ordered.
2. There had been no reason provided for Court Administration failing to schedule the hearing before Judge Haaz.
3) The matter had been before 15 judges already. It is reasonable to request an explanation for the arbitrary reassignment to yet another judge.
4) No acceptable explanation was offered.

It would take a judge with a great deal of integrity to be able too handle the issues involved in the matter. Since 2007, I have given each judge the benefit of the doubt. Each judge failed immediately... with one notable exception. Judge Haaz. Judge Haaz effectively and immediately addressed defects in due process when presented to him during the short list conference in July 2012. It seemed that the pending stalled Appeal was preventing the hearing from being scheduled. Jurisdiction remains with the Superior Court until the Appeal is decided.

Judge Page failed quickly, demonstrating poor and careless organizational issues, and his bias to dismiss the Pro Se Defendant even when the facts are clearly on the court record. Judge Page went on to recognize that hearings had NOT taken place before Judge Carluccio. When he came to that realization, he and Valerie Angsgt began a little dance. He accepted and encouraged her misinformation. He coached her through a few statements, as Judge Page needed to protect the 'integrity' of Judge Carluccio's invalid orders.

Problem is that there is no protecting a void order which lacked jurisdiction. There is no way to make up for the lack of jurisdiction, the lack of hearings, the lack of due process, etc. The Orders are Void Ab Initio. After the hearing, in his absurd Order, Judge Page neglected to address any of the issues I presented regarding jurisdiction.

Jurisdiction is necessary. Jurisdiction has tangible elements which must be in place to permit the judge to conduct hearings and issue orders. Without jurisdiction, the judge is powerless and prevented from issuing an Order. If the judge had jurisdiction, it could be presented in minutes. When they fail to address their jurisdiction, they perpetrate a fraud and create a conspiracy which eventually involves more and more people in their crimes.

Judge Carluccio did not have jurisdiction to issue the Divorce Decree. She was informed of the fatal defect... AND IGNORED IT. The Equitable Distribution Order written by Judge Carluccio cannot stand without a Divorce Decree so the Equitable Distribution Order is VOID AB INITIO.

BUT, Judge Carluccio was dishing out unfair punishments and irreparable damage to the target of her maliciously biased orders. Judge Carluccio had secretly cancelled hearings AND GOTTEN CAUGHT. Judge Carluccio had made false reports to the courthouse deputies in an attempt to intimidate me. Judge Carluccio had 'made ridiculous things up out of thin air' committing fraud in her own courtroom. Judge Carluccio was not going to permit the resolution of any matter raised by the Defendant. She was determined to do what SHE WANTED TO DO without regard to civil rights, due process or the law. She was the judge and she could abuse the power of her office to compel other people to enforce her invalid/void orders. In doing so she made county personnel a party to her crimes. Judge Carluccio's fraud and abuse also causes her to forfeit her judicial immunity... AND ALSO FORFEIT THE IMMUNITY FOR THE PRIOR JUDGES.

Judge Carluccio made a complete mess out of everything and further obstructed justice, denied access to the court, and illegally blocked an Appeal of her void order from being sent to Superior Court. She began a cascading series of illegal actions based on her invalid and void orders. By continuing the abuse, she terrorized the victim of the court's deliberate injustice. She ordered her target to be homeless, prevented him from obtaining his possessions, and deliberately ignored petitions filed with the court to address the impending irreparable damage. This after 6 years of constant litigation and the complete denial of any custody or visitation (without explanation or reason).

The actions of Sonya Healy and Angst & Angst to involve more and more people in their criminal actions leads them to interpret that they would never address the injustice and face prosecution when the team harassing and terrorizing the one person is SO huge. Every County Department, realtors, title search companies, insurance companies, so many people have deliberately kept me uninformed. It suggests there is yet another secret order which requires people to ignore any request for information.

Judge Carluccio further issued an Order preventing the Defendant from addressing any of her prior malicious actions. While the Appeal was sitting in Norristown and NOT BEING PREPARED FOR THE SUPERIOR COURT, I was prevented from addressing the abusive and criminal actions of the judiciary to conceal their injustice.

One important thing to remember is that Judge Page issued his $300,000+ Order knowing that I had followed all of the prior orders and had testified to the exact date and time the items in question were delivered to the location ordered verbally on the Record by Judge Carluccio. I also have in my possession the hand written document from Judge Carluccio which was greatly expanded by Valerie Angst and Peggy before placing the photoshopped signature of Judge Carluccio on the Order.

Judge Page ignored all of the evidence. He proceeded with apparent intent to bury me so deeply in debt that I would never recover. Note: Ordering a homeless person who has been unemployed since 2007 to pay over $300,000 to the person who deliberately and criminally manipulated corrupted and polluted the entire judiciary is clearly intended to bury the victim in debt so deep that he will never escape. At my highest full salary, the amount would be greater than 5 years salary. Imagine that? For something which they lied about. And where they neglected to produce the verbal part of the order.

When the absurd Order was appealed, Judge Page was forced to play along and GRANTED the Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis(IFP). I had spent an entire day attempting to have a judge hear the IFP. No judge would hear it.

IT WAS REALIZED THAT THE EARLIER APPEAL WOULD ALSO BE TRANSMITTED TO THE SUPERIOR COURT... AND MAKE AVAILABLE THE TRANSCRIPTS WHICH CLEARLY DOCUMENTED THE TREMENDOUS INJUSTICE AND THE JUDGE'S FRAUD.

Judge Page then, WITHOUT ANY PROCEEDING, revoked the Petition to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. He further notified each of the Court Reporters to NOT PREPARE the transcripts required and requested.

Judge Page lacked jurisdiction to revoke his order granting the status. BUT, HE DID IT. In doing so he has made each of the court reporters a party to his criminal obstruction and denial of access to the courts.

I could not appeal the revocation because I would need the Pauper status to file that appeal. There had been a rule change that further blocked the filing of the Notice of Appeal document without the IFP in place. When they revoke your IFP, and you need an IFP to proceed, the court has deliberately prevented access to the higher courts.

Judge Page was also covering his own judicial errors. He wrote an opinion which is laughable in that it also fails to address the very specific issue of jurisdiction. It suggests that Judge Carluccio must have had jurisdiction because she issued her order. THEREFORE, there is no need to examine the issue of jurisdiction. He digs deeper and comes up with statements which are almost as crazy as Judge Carluccio's 'if it is not circled' fraudulent misrepresentation.

When I point out that my rights are being denied and request explanations and hearings, Judge Page has now DENIED those petitions WITHOUT HEARINGS. Clearly now dealing with a judge without integrity criminally abusing the power of his office under color of law to obstruct justice and deny access to the higher courts.

At what point did Judge Page lose his integrity? At one point he suggested he had integrity.

Bear in mind, I have no choice but to defend against the injustice. There is no escape from the constant intrusions. Surely, the judge had to know I would appeal his absurd Order. BUT NOW AN Appeal WOULD EXPOSE JUDGE CARLUCCIO AND THE OTHERS.

Prior to the February hearing when I requested a continuance due to the failing health of my father who has since passed away. I had escalated the written request to Judge Page's attentioon with a phone call. Judge Page failed to respond all day and had a member of his staff call and say I had to appear for the hearing. I begged the person to have him reconsider. Judge Page personally called from his own cell phone and ORDERED me to be in his courtroom at 9:00 AM the next morning. As the hearing was scheduled for the afternoon, I was under the impression Judge Page simply wanted to meet me before permitting the continuance.

BUT NO. Judge Page was being a 'dick'. He thought the hearing was scheduled for 9:00 AM. He had no intention of considering the continuance. He wanted the proceeding to occur without regard for my family emergency.

AND, Judge Page didn't even show up at the Courthouse til close to 10:00 AM. I had none of my paperwork with me, and Angst & Angst were unaware of the judge's rescheduling to 9:00 AM. Judge Page was now basically embarassed into continuing the hearing. Not for any compassionate reason. Simply because of his own carelessness.

The handwriting was on the wall. I know the drill. Each judge is slightly different. Judge Page was going to attempt to prevent exhibits and evidence at the hearing. I had to be as over-prepared as possible. At the hearing, I made sure all exhibits were submitted. I recall thinking that Valerie Angst had taken NO ACTION to respond to the lack of jurisdiction. She ignored it. I recall thinking that would be problematic for her on Appeal. Generally, if you neglect to address an issue in the hearing, the issue may not be raised/defended during the Appeal. So I kind of knew things would go against me with Judge Page, BUT the Appeal process could not be ignored and blocked AGAIN.

Yet, here we are. Judge Page is creating needless drama by issuing orders without hearings where he lack jurisdiction during a pending Appeal. And until he proves that his court has jurisdiction, he is simply helping to build a clearcut Federal case.

What do they gain by terrorizing me? Don't they realize I have no other choice and must persevere through their harassment intrusion and terror. It would seem they become angry as I am forced to point out their corruption and failures which subject me to incredible injustice. What do they expect? Seriously, They annihilated every aspect of my life... Did they think I would disappear quietly into the night? That's not gonna happen.

{Judge Page's actions have been reported to law enforcement authorities. Had they acted when the crimes were first reported in 2007, things would have gone differently.]