Bucks County Senator & Representative Meetings and Visits

This week we traveled around Bucks County stopping to deliver packages of the letters and the newspaper from Scranton/Wilkes-Barre and requesting meetings with Congressmen, State Senators and Representatives regarding the unconstitutionality and the injustice of Rule 1.6.

We appreciate the interest and the support we are receiving from those who have been informed and anticipate further cooperation and effort from those who are only now learning about this national constitutional issue.

US Congressman Mike Fitzpatrick received a copy of the documents and newspaper in his office near Newtown. Then, as luck would have it, we ran into him at the Courthouse in Doylestown to hand deliver a set and quickly discuss the urgency of meeting on the issue. A meeting with the congressmen has not yet been scheduled by his office.

Representative Scott Petri's people had some time to sit with us for a discussion of the issue. A meeting with the representative was requested.

Representative Marguerite Quinn has scheduled a meeting.

Representative John T. Galloway's assistant Brenda sat with us and reviewed the documents left for the representative. A meeting with the representative was requested.

Representative Tina Davis's Chief of Staff met with us and heard an overview of the issue. The package was left with him to review with the representative. A meeting with the representative was requested.

Representative Steven J. Santarsiero's people had some time to review the issue. Chief of Staff Rosemary Wuenschel accepted the paperwork to review with the representative and schedule a meeting to discuss the topic.

Our neighbor in Doylestown, Senator Chuck McIlhinney, was not available to meet. We left updates and documents with his staff and AGAIN requested an opportunity to discuss the silence from the Pennsylvania Senate since December 2013 regarding the issue.

Senator Robert Tomlinson's assistant accepted the paperwork and the request for a meeting on the topic.

Representative Frank Farry's office manager sat down for a very good meeting and discussion of the topic. After reviewing the documents and newspaper articles, a meeting with the representative was requested.

Representative Kathy Watson had obviously reviewed the documentation delivered prior to our meeting. A very productive discussion and explanation and review of the issue ended with a request for the PA Legislature to be formally informed of the issue. Representative Watson understood and recognized the problem we were reporting and attempting to address. We anticipate her involvement in the resolution of the matter for the sake of the Commonwealth and the country.

Representative Clymer's office was not open when we visited.

Senator Bob Mensch's office is on our list for Montgomery County visits.

Senator Stewart Greenleaf's office refuses to schedule a meeting on the issue. As head of the Judiciary Committee this is NOT ACCEPTABLE. We will continue to pursue the involvement of Senator Greenleaf while questioning his deliberate, intentional and well informed avoidance of the issue. His silence demonstrates complicity.

Representative Todd Stephens was caught in his office and denied meeting with Healy before in 2011 about the corruption in Montgomery County. That was when Healy v Healy had only involved 16 judges. Now it's at 20 with two appeals in Superior Court pending. Rep. Stephens has been trained to believe that judges may deny people's rights which are protected by the US Constitution. TODD STEPHENS IS WRONG. After that foolishness was addressed, the impromptu meeting ended abruptly. A meeting with the representative was requested to further discuss the issue.

While we were out enjoying the back roads of beautiful Bucks County, the fax was sending copies to EVERY Pennsylvania State Representative. Confirmations received.

The government of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has been notified of the issue.

Heroes and Villains

I posted the following 'nominations' to the WBTruth Exposing Corruption site.

They presented their list of Heroes & Villains on the steps of the Luzerne County Courthouse on July 17, 2014.

---

A few nominations...

Heroes... Todd Krautheim, Terance Healy
( Working to expose an unconstitutional law (improperly enacted in every state) which robs people of their rights, and prevents lawyers, judges and law enforcement from any action to expose it.)

Villains... The Wilkes Barre Law And Library Association
(aka... The Luzerne County Bar Association) The lawyers all know they must maintain silence/confidentiality where it would adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary. Silent Complicity.

CHALLENGE... Willian Ecenbarger. Heroes do NOT conceal the actions of Villains.
I might raise the question of the investigative journalist who seems to have switched sides. It would seem that William Ecenbarger, as a NON_LAWYER aware of the lawyers MANDATE OF CONFIDENTIALITY pursuant to Rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct, neglects to ever indicate the LAW which silenced the Luzerne County legal community in the face or extreme corruption. Though he is NOT mandated by law to conceal the impact of Rule 1.6, HE DID.

William Ecenbarger now conducts CLE classes for the Bar Association - The Psychology of Secrets.

I excuse Lourdes Rosado, Juvenile Justice Center, for failing to expose the impact of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality in the SILENCE surrounding corruption. As an attorney, she is mandated BY LAW to maintain the 'dirty little secret' of Rule 1.6.

The efforts of the Juvenile Justice Center exposed that the failure of the judiciary to recognize the damage they have caused extends to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. It was the PA Supreme Court who enacted Rule 1.6. An act of unconstitutional magnitude which was made irreversible at the time it was enacted. Lawyers cannot reveal the damage caused by the law. Two non-lawyers could. AND, Healy and Krautheim did.

Villain... Interbranch Commission on Juvenile Justice - The commission failed to see themselves among “those who knew but failed to speak; those who saw but failed to act.” The commission fails to address their silence, while misdirecting blame to include public officials and private citizens who did speak and were ignored; who did act and were dismissed.

THE COMMISSION failed to indicate any impact of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of information.

THE COMMISSIONS MEMBERS
Judge John M. Cleland - - - - A judge mandated to follow Rule 1.6.
Judge James A. Gibbons - - - - A judge mandated to follow Rule 1.6.
Judge John C. Uhler - - - - A judge mandated to follow Rule 1.6.
Judge Dwayne Woodruff - - - - A judge mandated to follow Rule 1.6.
Kenneth J. Horoho, Jr, Esquire - - - - A lawyer mandated to follow Rule 1.6.
Jason A. Legg, Esquire - - - - A lawyer mandated to follow Rule 1.6.
Robert L. Listenbee, Jr. Esquire - - - - A lawyer mandated to follow Rule 1.6.
George Mossee, Esquire - - - - A lawyer mandated to follow Rule 1.6.
Darren M. Breslin, Esquire - - - - A lawyer mandated to follow Rule 1.6.
Tod C. Allen
Valerie Bender
Ronald P. Williams

WITNESSES WHO APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMISSION
The president judge of Luzerne County - - - - A judge mandated to follow Rule 1.6.
the former district attorney - - - - A lawyer mandated to follow Rule 1.6.
the incumbent district attorney- - - - A lawyer mandated to follow Rule 1.6.
the county public defender - - - - A lawyer mandated to follow Rule 1.6.
assistant district attorneys - - - - A lawyer mandated to follow Rule 1.6.
assistant public defenders - - - - A lawyer mandated to follow Rule 1.6.
juvenile probation officials ???
former juvenile defendants ???
parents of juvenile defendants ???
school officials ???
county commissioners ???
officials of the Judicial Conduct Board judges and lawyers - - - - ALL mandated to follow Rule 1.6.

Silence, inaction, inexperience, fear of retaliation. Greed, ambition, carelessness. MAYBE.

BUT, There was no ignorance of the law requiring CONFIDENTIALITY… the Commission's failure to act was deliberate and deceptive and calculating.

BTW, Rule 1.6 has a far broader effect than Attorney-Client Privilege. The mandate of confidentiality extends beyond a lawyers death.

Rule 1.6 mandates an obligation to maintain confidentiality where information
- would affect the integrity of the judiciary, or
- would reveal the misconduct of the lawyers office, or
- would expose individual liability of the lawyer, or
- would negatively impact their client.

Government lawyers are unsure of WHO their client even is…
- Public
- Government as a whole
- Branch of government in which employed
- Particular agency or department
- Responsible officers who make decisions with an agency or department.

Rule 1.6 concealed the single point of failure… itself.

THE COMMISSION CONCEALED THAT BIT OF INFORMATION.
- As a result, they took no true step towards preventing another scandal.
- They failed to protect the people.
- They failed to protect the judiciary from further corruption.

Far more frightening, these lawyers now know how to do it... and how to get away with it.

Ciavarella and Coonahan went to jail ONLY BECAUSE they were inept at money laundering.