Rule 1.6 has NOT been Misinterpreted or Misunderstood

The Constitutional Challenge is NOT misinterpreting or misunderstanding Rule 1.6.

These are the dismissive suggestions of lawyers with regard to the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6. It is what they tell people who ask them about it. They offer no further information to back up their statement. They further indicate that we will never succeed. (and neglect to explain.)

These lawyers are WRONG.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 backs up every statement. Every post on the web has supporting documentation which corroborates every statement.

Within Pennsylvania we have four clear examples of Corruption and Injustice where the actions of the judiciary and lawyers involved in the matters have defied any logical and acceptable explanation. When Rule 1.6 is applied the actions of law enforcement are clearly explained.
- Kids for Cash
- Jerry Sandusky prosecution & the Sandusky Report
- Foreclosures


How about we have a discussion? a debate? in Public? on Television? Anytime... Anywhere...


Let's see who understands the improperly enacted and unconstitutional law - lawyers mandated to say nothing about it, or two non-lawyers who can demonstrate the mandate for lawyers to conspire to conceal injustice and corruption.

As those same lawyers are MANDATED to silence/confidentiality of information even where it is about Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information, We will see who is misinterpreting misunderstanding OR misinforming.

And we will see who gets disciplined for discussing the issue.

Rule 1.6 is frequently the subject of law review articles. Usually those articles are also addressing the problems with the Rule which cause it to undermine undermine morality, ethics, personal integrity. AND TO UNDERMINE JUSTICE. Search for those keywords in your favorite search engine. You may be surprised at the volume of material. The step that seems to be missing from any article is the unconstitutional aspect and the inescapable situation it causes for the victims of judicial corruption and injustice.

Addressing the injustice of Rule 1.6 is an inevitability. Facing it responsibly will affect the public reaction to this realization.

Where substantive rights are violated, directly or collaterally, the law is repugnant to the Constitution and a nullity.

The judiciary have buried an unconstitutional law so deep in the law books that they never expected any non-lawyer to find it, and survive to prove it while being denied their constitutional rights and the protection of the law.

No matter how deeply the mandate of Rule 1.6 is buried and concealed, THE LAW MAY NOT VIOLATE SUBSTANTIVE RIGHTS.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 has been presented to the President of the United States, the United States Congress and the Supreme Court of the United States.

WE WELCOME YOUR QUESTIONS AND WILL ENDEAVOR TO ANSWER EACH. COMMENTS are not published on this site, but comments are reviewed and responded to on a regular basis.

When Judges Fail to Answer the Question

How do you continue to treat the judiciary with the necessary respect when they are being complete asses?

Each Petition and document filed since May 2011 has indicated the defective and void order of May 9, 2011.

Each Appeal (Carluccio, Page, Weilheimer) has indicated the defective and void order of May 9, 2011.

Each Concise Statement includes the indication that the order is defective and void. AB INITIO.

Each Opinion issued by the judges fails to address the defect, fails to address the void, and then mistates and misrepresents random irrelevant items.

It's almost laughable when they cite law. When the law they cite is not applicable and they are ignoring the one law that DOES apply. The LAW THAT INDICATES THE JUDGE HAD NO JURISDICTION FOR THE MAY 9th order, and each subsequent order is undone because they are based on a defective and void order. All nullities based on a nullity.

The issue has been properly raised and presented over a hundred times... before three judges. Never contested or refuted. Never addressed by opposing counsel. YET, Ignored by the judiciary.

SIMPLY PUT: If the order was not defective, they would prove that and back it up with relevant statements and be done with it.

But the judges can't. So they don't. And Rule 1.6 forces them to stupidity and irrelevance to avoid addressing the lack of jurisdiction.

It should be no big deal. Why wouldn't they address the issue? It's not a matter of interpretation. It is a procedure which MUST be followed. But, it wasn't.

Instead of facing the issue, Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio made such a deliberate malicious mess pushing for my suicide... Her courtroom was lawless fraud, intimidation and judicial terror. Carluccio was attempting to 'bury' years of injustice and corruption by the entire Montgomery County Bench.

ANSWER: Follow the law. End the deception. End the lawlessness. End the corruption.

In the long run, there is no possible way for the effective order to ever have jurisdiction. Jurisdiction cannot be created retroactively. There's no fixing it. IT MUST BE FACED.

THE ONLY ANSWER: Follow the law. End the deception. End the lawlessness. End the corruption.

The judiciary and the lawyers have terrorized my life for over 8 years... all documented on the court record. The excessive volume of injustice and the clear intent is so undeniable and all consuming that it backfired in such a massive way to reveal the injustice was nationwide AND DELIBERATE AND ALL CAUSED, ENABLED, IGNORED AND UN-PROSECUTED BECAUSE OF RULE 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY WHEN IT ADVERSELY AFFECTS THE JUDICIARY.

NEWSFLASH: JUDICIAL CORRUPTION AND INJUSTICE ADVERSELY AFFECTS THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIARY. Rule 1.6 conceals judicial corruption and injustice and is aggressively enforced. By design, it promotes corruption and undermines the courts.

And considering the continuing collateral damage that the Rule 1.6 Confidentiality/Conspiracy requires... It's about time the judiciary faces their truth.

The American Bar Association has undermined the judiciary in every state. Overthrown the government to the point where everything is broken or breaking. There is no ignoring the mess.

So face it. JUSTICE IS COMING.

Any delay is only going to exacerbate the situation more and more. The civil unrest will escalate further when the People learn that the Courts have failed to take responsibility and that they were informed ("caught") a year ago. The Rule 1.6 secret is not going back in the box.

In Kids for Cash, Ann Lokuta was Rule 1.6 - Disciplined and removed from the bench for contacting the FBI. Every lawyer in the state kept confidential, even the district attorneys, prosecutors and attorneys general and governors.

A Commission of lawyers deliberately neglected to expose that Rule 1.6 was the silence of “those who knew but failed to speak; those who saw but failed to act.”

The Commission did NOTHING which would prevent a recurrence, or a continuation of the judicial corruption and injustice.

Far more frightening, these lawyers now know how to do it… and how to get away with it.

Ciavarella and Coonahan went to jail ONLY BECAUSE they were inept at money laundering.

The ABA has done well by its membership. Their profession creates an economy and a case whenever it chooses, requiring the use of their membership at $200-500/hour. Even when lawyers are stealing houses through fraudulent foreclosures using fake companies, false and robo-signed deeds, they expect you to hire a lawyer to help you. While Rule 1.6 prevents them from helping because they cannot acknowledge the fraud and misrepresentation.

They even created programs which could occur before going to court where again the lawyers were the ones getting paid.

And everyone fell for it.