Three Appeals will now be sent to the PA Supreme Court - with all three demonstrating the corruption and failure of the lower court AND the interception by the Superior Court Legal Staff - their fraudulent documents interfered with the administration of justice... and denied access to the court.
All three appeals neglected the deliberately defective and void order of Judge Carolyn Carluccio which lacked jurisdiction... still lacks jurisdiction... can never have jurisdiction... with a defect which causes a lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
The defect - failure to follow the PA law - cause a clear loss of subject matter jurisdiction. All circuits interpret Stump and Bradley to require a clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction in order to lose judicial immunity.
The deliberately defective and void order causes the loss of judicial immunity for the entire judiciary in Healy v Healy. 20 judges of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas. Where EVERY PROCEEDING AND ORDER since 2007 can be demonstrated to be undermined and leveraged by corruption and confidentiality mandated by Rule 1.6. Relitigate? No point. Recovery and escape from further their is a necessity. The case history demonstrates the affect of Rule 1.6 on my rights.
SUPERIOR COURT - CENTRAL LEGAL STAFF
Why would the Central Legal Staff not provide/deliver the appeal to the judges? To protect the judges from acting in a matter where they would have no judicial immunity.
So the Central Legal Staff intercepts and intervenes and acts to conceal the lower courts error, and the lower court's gross negligence when informed of the defect, and the lower court's continued malicious retaliation against the victim of their error.
There is no law which permits the Central Legal Staff to intercept and intervene. Their actions clearly deny due process and access to the court - constitutional violations. Any attempt to conceal their crimes pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality proves that Rule 1.6 causes the denial of constitutionally protected rights of litigant.
Where it denies constitutional rights, the substantive rights of a litigant have been affected demonstrating the lack of authority for the state Supreme Court to enact Rule 1,6 into law.
Rule 1.6 is an unconstitutional nullity - NOT A LAW.
PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL, KATHLEEN KANE
Where required by Rule 521 to notify the state Attorney general where the constitutionality of a law will come into question, PA Attorney General Kathleen Kane was notified of the three appeals in the Superior Court AND that the constitutionality of Rule 1,.6 would be called into question.
Filed in good faith, I did not expect the Central Legal Staff to demonstrate the unconstitutional affect of Rule 1.6.
Attorney General Kathleen Kane was subsequently ordered to silence by secret court orders from two different courts. The orders further prevented her from performing the functions and responsibilities of the Attorney General.
A Grand Jury called Kathleen Kane to testify under strict confidentiality which would prevent disclosure and investigative action by the attorney general.
The Norristown Grand Jury seeks to conceal the evidence of the extreme malicious corruption and cruelty of Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio in the matter of Healy v Healy.
The Grand Jury is being run by Special Prosecutor Thomas Carluccio. Had any other attorney been running the grand jury, they could be compelled to testify about the matter. A husband cannot be compelled to testify against his wife. The Norristown Grand Jury seeks to conceal the evidence.
Secret Order #1 was issued by the Superior Court of Pennsylvania demanding silence and non-participation of the attorney general. An act of judicial corruption and manipulation which prevents the attorney general from performing her job responsibilities and violates her oath of office.
Secret Order #2 was issued by the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas demanding silence and non-participation of the attorney general while seeking to determine the amount of information the attorney general already knew about Healy v Healy and the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 - and then requiring the information to be suppressed.
THE SECRET IS THAT INJUSTICE IS INESCAPABLE WHILE THE JUDICIARY VIOLATE THE PUBLIC TRUST TO PERPETUATE A CONSPIRACY OF CORRUPTION INITIATED BY THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION.
A secret order by a secret judge can not be secretly enforced... the judge and the court would have to reveal themselves to the public.. exposing their corruption to sunlight.
I believe it is time for Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane to break her silence.
I would hope she is joined by Attorney General Eric Holder and President Barack Obama.
I would hope they are supported by every state Attorney General - who have had their deliberate default action in the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 undermined and silenced.
I respectfully and sincerely request the support of every American to restore justice and the US Constitution.
Every. Person. Matters.
JUSTICE NOW.
Equality
No comments:
Post a Comment