Swiss Cheese, Donuts, and Elephants. OH MY!

How does any recap of Kathleen Kane's 2014 not mention the two secret court orders from unidentified judges in unidentified courts which prevent her from investigations and prosecutions AND PREVENT HER FROM DISCUSSING IT?

The American News Media fails to explain the holes in their reporting. [Insert Swiss cheese or Donut metaphor here]

While surviving the constant litigation of Healy v Healy and Healy v Miller, it became obvious that the issue being ignored and neglected was distracting from that HUGE elephant in the room.

It became UNDENIABLE.... it was the non-disclosure pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information which was undermining the law, undermining justice, undermining the Constitution... AND LEGAL PROFESSIONALS WERE NOT PERMITTED TO POINT IT OUT... and prevented from any actions which addressed it.

How do you point out the corruption caused by a law, when the very law itself prevents it from being exposed?

How did this unconstitutional, unethical and immoral LAW find it's way into the ethics standards for lawyers in EVERY state?

An unethical ethics standard mandates fraud in the furtherance of fraud without any allowance for rectifying it. A complete disregard for the rights of the victim, who becomes further victimized without any opportunity for relief. (What if they never stop the 'furtherances'?)

Surely, 50 state legislatures and governors would have noticed. BUT, The American Bar Association provided their 'Ethics' Rules to each state supreme court to enact into LAW.

No construction by a legislature.
No constitutional review.
No signature of a governor.
No ability for the court to reverse - it would expose their corruption... adverse judicial affects violate Rule 1.6

EVERY LAWYER, JUDGE AND LEGAL PROFESSIONAL MANDATED TO IGNORE... and they all did.

With only themselves to regulate and discipline the profession, the extreme failure of their deliberate lapse in ethics was concealed, non-disclosed and kept confidential for decades. Many simply accepted and never questioned the injustice and corruption - even when wrapped in constitutional violations and fraud. They knew it was wrong. They did nothing.
Note to Lawyers: THAT'S NOT SELF-POLICING. It's called conspiracy when you cover up the crimes of others. Awards from the bar associations for your 'efforts' quickly begin to resemble kickbacks when compiled on a resume.

INJUSTICE, JUDICIAL CORRUPTION, FRAUD UPON THE COURT, Manipulation of the media to divide people, prevent information and prevent exposure of the needle in the haystack of US Injustice. Look at EVERY story of injustice in the US and you can see the effect of Rule 1.6 - there's a lawyer who is concealing the truthful information while presenting disinformation and misinformation... because Rule 1.6 allows and endorses their fraud in the furtherance of injustice.

The fix is simple. Prepare for a shameful mea culpa from the state and federal judiciary for their egregious violations and rape of the public trust. Once Rule 1.6 is removed. Everything else works still. Rule 1.6 was the problem which undermined every reform or attempt to 'correct' the problems with the judiciary and the courts.

American judges are not known for deftness and speed when addressing their irresponsible actions. Shamelessly, they have known for years that the Rule 1.6 problem was very exposed. They tried to hide it. They persist in using further injustice to conceal their injustice... because Rule 1.6 allows and endorses their fraud in the furtherance of fraud.

The only possible issue which Kathleen Kane could be addressing in that CNN interview... Every statement clearly points to Rule 1.6 issues. Once you know what it is, and how big the problem,

Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane received court orders from unidentified courts and unidentified judges for unidentified reasons. About the Orders, she said the following:
– “We are not investigating. I cannot investigate.”
– “I am being stopped from performing my duties as Attorney General.”
– “My office is being stopped from certain investigations.”
– “And we are being stopped even from telling why.”
– “My hands are tied and this will be frustrating for you because it is just as frustrating for me.”
– “My hands are tied because there are court orders which don’t allow us to say certain things which I believe the public needs to know.”
– “I knew that I was walking into public corruption. Which again is why I ran.”
– “But I will tell you this. Even I am shocked at the level of public corruption.”
– “I am shocked at how deep it goes.
I am shocked at how powerful it is.
I have never seen anything like this. It’s breathtaking.
It has been described by the people familiar with what is happening as shameful.”
– “But, if this can be done to me as Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer of the 5th largest state in the country, i am sickened to think what can and may be done to regular, good people who don’t have the resources that I have to challenge it.”

When you consider that Governor Tom Corbett has been Attorney General or Governor for the last decade, and most everyone who accuses Kathleen Kane of 'silence' has something to be exposed once the veil is lifted...

Occam's Razor applies and explains... It's Rule 1.6

Except Daryl Metcalfe - who seems to be EXTREMELY CONCERNED that some man is gonna pop the question.

Would someone please prepare a Petition for the signature of every gay man in the Commonwealth where they promise NOT TO MARRY DARYL METCALFE.

Maybe then Daryl can relax his sphincter. ( [Takei voice] OH MY, that could be problematic too, I suppose.)