The Impossibility of Resolution can be demonstrated. Those who conspired to deny and prevent justice can be held legally responsible for criminal actions, denial of constitutional rights, their negligence in applying the Rule of Law, and obstruction of justice. The IMMUNITIES - Absolute, Qualified, Judicial, Prosecutorial, Witness, Legislative - do not prevent criminal and civil actions against those involved.
| This document will attempt to address the general aspects affecting everyone involved. It will be as short as it has to be. My hope is to provide an outline which will permit deliberate and immediate attention and corrective actions by the people and the organizations involved. I do not anticipate a detailed listing of criminal statues with assignment to the individuals and officials involved. The scope of this document will likely overwhelm any reader. I know the rationale for the corruption, perversion and denial of justice. I know why they are continuing with the intentional and deliberate negligence and fraud. I have acted because of necessity in good faith within procedures and law towards a resolution. Survivors of this type of injustice fall into three categories 1) Homeless/Destitute, 2) Incarcerated, 3) Suicide. Those responsible don't care. THEY HAVE DONE THIS TO MILLIONS OF PEOPLE - they know their constitutional rights were denied and ignored without explanation and in contradiction to the applicable law. I have never acted with malice or aggression towards anyone. I have never attempted to solicit or coerce any action by anyone which would subject them to negative affects due to a perception of having helped me improperly. When help was requested, I was ignored. I begged. I begged everyone. My documents and personal presentation has always been respectful. I have been subjected to tremendous disrespect, discourtesy, misinformation, disinformation, deliberate misdirection and misuse of government resources. The actions and efforts involved in the conspiracy to conceal an act of judicial misconduct/injustice prevented it from being addressed/resolved, while spawning unending and ever-expanding activities which attack and destroy every aspect of my life. Where actions against me were unlawful, and violated my civil and constitutional rights, I make no excuses and do not excuse those who tore my life apart. I did nothing to deserve this. Why are they preventing any exit? |
The description in the header of the web site summarizes with precision the experience, the current situation and the action necessary for resolution. It was first posted in 2008. It has only been edited ONCE. In July 2013,recognizing that EVERY failure of legal professionals to act or respond could be attributed to and concealed by one state law - - Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct
I am a sane man dealing with an absolutely insane situation.
Every person in a position to help has acted improperly in direct violation of procedures and the law preventing the resolution of any matter…
They each make the situation worse…
NO ONE HELPED…
NO ONE COULD HELP… until the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6.
Insert Healy v Healy Injustice and Denial of Rights and the Law here.
Healy v Healy Superior Court Fraud here
Attorney General Kathleen Kane
- Rule 521 Constitutional issue
- Secret Court Orders which prevent AG Kane from disclosing investigating or acting
Montgomery County Grand Jury Investigation
Special Prosecutor Carluccio
Is this Grand Jury called to conceal evidence? Emails?
Having Spec Prosecutor Carluccio would prevent him from having to disclose the efforts of the grand jury to suppress evidence which could be used against his wife, Judge Carluccio, who used emails to cancel multiple hearings, who has prevented the appeal of her defective and void order, who has deliberately neglected to address her defective and void order.
- the defective and void order was referred to as an UNAPPEALABLE ORDER
- It was appealable, BUT she blocked it for over a year, the superior court neglects to address the lack of jurisdiction to issue the order, the violation of the law, and the loss of judicial immunity for herself and the prior judges who conspired to deny justice
- Judge Carluccio's retaliatory and void court orders caused irreparable damage to property and showed an abuse of power under color of law with intent to cause emotional distress
- Healy v Healy has been before 20 judges from the Montgomery County Judiciary
- each sacrifices their integrity to conceal the lack of integrity of the prior judges
- immunity is not available to the judges where there orders lacked jurisdiction and the entire matter can be demonstrated to have been a farce of epic cruel proportions.
Attorney General Kathleen Kane prevented from disclosing information
Superior Court Central Legal Staff
Intercept and Fraud to deny appeal
County, State and Federal prosecution for violating PA Law and Constitutional Rights
Healy v Miller Injustice and Denial of Rights and the Law here.
Attorney Liability - failed to provide any real basis in law for dismissal ignoring lack of jurisdiction.
Healy v Miller Superior Court Fraud here
Attorney General Kathleen Kane
- Rule 521 Constitutional issue
- Secret Court Orders which prevent AG Kane from disclosing investigating or acting
Superior Court Central Legal Staff
Intercept and Fraud to deny appeal
County, State and Federal prosecution for violating PA Law and Constitutional Rights
.
PROBLEM:
A law designed to ignore judicial corruption and injustice which includes an aggressively enforced MANDATE of silence for all lawyers while ignoring, denying and preventing the constitutional rights of a litigant has been enacted by the state supreme court in every state without proper construction, without constitutional review, without involvement of any state legislature and without the signature of any governor.
Where the law affects the substantive rights of a litigant, the state supreme courts were without proper authority to enact the law pursuant to the state constitutions. Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information is repugnant to the US Constitution, and is a nullity.
For more information: An Overview of the Challenge to Rule 1.6
The problem is national. Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information has been enacted in every state... (There are some slight modifications in some states. Contrary to the profound objection of the commission chairman, Robert Kutak, The American Bar Association deliberately removed the 'fraud provisions' from Rule 1.6 before presenting the Model Rules to the states.)
Having Rule 1.6 suspended, removed or declared unconstitutional will restore constitutional rights and equal protection of the law.
Judges, lawyers and legal professionals are not permitted to disclose information which will adversely affect the integrity of the court pursuant to Rule 1.6.
The following public officials are prevented by Rule 1.6 from exposing unconstitutional Rule 1.6 injustice:
State Supreme Court Justices
State Attorneys General
Commonwealth Court Judges
County District Attorneys
Superior Court Judges
Every judge and lawyer in every state
Lawyers in the state senates and legislatures
State Governors who are lawyers
US Senators who are lawyers
US Representatives who are lawyers
They are also permitted/required to act pursuant to Rule 1.6 to prevent unconstitutional Rule 1.6 injustice from being exposed. Their actions may not be disclosed, evwen when they are in the furtherance of the injustice.
The non-lawyer Governors seek advice from their lawyer or the state attorney general - who are not permitted to expose the issue or take any action.
The non-lawyer US Senators seek advice from their lawyers - who are not permitted to expose the issue or take any action.
The non-lawyer US Representative seek advice from their lawyers - who are not permitted to expose the issue or take any action.
Police will not take a complaint of judicial corruption.
County Detectives report to the District Attorneys who are not permitted to expose the issue or take any action.
RULE 1.6 HAS BUILT IN SELF-DEFENSE AND PRESERVATION NON-DISCLOSURE
- preventing disclosure
- preventing any effort to remove the law
- permitting fraud in the effort to maintain confidentiality (with that fraud kept confidential)
The County Sheriff is usually a non-lawyer with authority to enforce every law. After Rule 1.6 was enacted in each state, the sheriffs were informed of a greatly diminished role in law enforcement by the state attorney general, the judiciary and their lawyers. Many states have gone as far as eliminating the position of sheriff. The county sheriff takes no action to address the injustice.
FEDERAL AUTHORITIES - DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Marketed as an ethical fix for DOJ prosecutors, the McDade-Murtha Amendment was passed requiring DOJ and all federal government lawyers to follow the ethics rules which are in effect in the location where they are working.
The US Attorney General advised and campaigned against enacting the McDade-Murtha Amendment. Their campaign was somewhat half-hearted though... because Rule 1.6 already prevented them from telling the Congress exactly why it would be "devastatingly bad".
In congressional hearings, there was no testimony that Rule 1.6 made fraud legal when concealing prior fraud, and prevented disclosure or action to rectify the fraud. The state supreme courts had enacted ethics laws which lacked morality, required illegal actions to conceal and prevent exposure of fraud, and mandated non-disclosure/confidentiality of their participation in the fraud.
With the McDade-Murtha Amendment, the Federal Government - Department of Justice - all US Attorneys - and all government attorneys are not permitted to expose the issue, or take any action to expose the issue, or take any action to address the injustice and/or the related denial of constitutionally protected rights in any state.
TAKING THE CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUE TO THE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT
No comments:
Post a Comment