Injustice Pennsylvania Style (serves 12 million)

THE ISSUE:
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has made it illegal to remove an unconstitutional law they enacted (without authority).

The Pennsylvania Legislature has the exclusive constitutional authority to SUSPEND a law.

PROVISO:
Lawyers are permitted and encouraged to say or do anything which will prevent the situation from being rectified. All fraud in the furtherance of their effort is excused and held confidential… UNLESS, they kill someone.

Improperly enacted and unconstitutional
- ONE LAW - "undeniably unconstitutional"
undermined the judiciary and usurped their authority
mandating confidentiality and excusing fraud to prevent exposure.
Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information.

The recipe that hooked the American Judiciary - judges can't get enough.
They can't control themselves and can't say why.

Prepare allowing to quietly simmer for 30 years. DO NOT BRING TO FULL BOIL or you won't be able to keep the crowds away. Add additional fraud, as required, to maintain consistent base and extend the recipe. Caution when serving to young children - they don't say how you make it, but won't keep the secret - Luzerne County Kids for Cash. Over-sharing can result in widespread foreclosures, homelessness and incarceration without possibility of release. If you are feeling suicidal thoughts and tendencies, loss of relationships, financial hardship, your paranoia is real and not imagined. [CONFIDENTIAL] Will NEVER cause death (without full disclosure). It won't kill you and we won't say why!

NOBODY SERVES UP INJUSTICE AND CORRUPTION LIKE THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION.
It would be illegal if they tried!

It required two 'secret court orders from unidentified courts' to keep PA Attorney General Kathleen Kane from saying anything more.

The 'unidentified court' could not order the Attorney General as that would violate the law which established the Office of the Attorney General and the PA Constitution. (Overreach into The Legislative and Executive Branches)

The 'unidentified court' ordered the person, Kathleen Kane, to silently comply and participate in the denial of constitutional rights AND denial of the rule of law while facing the FULL LIABILITY WITHOUT IMMUNITY. A litigant had PROVEN the Judiciary undermined and usurped by the ABA had violated his rights concealed by Rule 1.6 confidentiality.

The litigant, Terance Healy, had survived A Terroristic Divorce of incomprehensible injustice and corruption before 20 judges in Montgomery County, PA. Unexplained and ignored pursuant to Rule 1.6 confidentiality. Rule 1.6 Injustice. UNCONSTITUTIONAL INJUSTICE IGNORED.

Rule 1.6 unconstitutional - improperly enacted into law - when proven to be 'no law' was written into those 'secret orders from unidentified courts' to continue the denial of his rights, with liability and blame placed specifically upon the person Kathleen Kane, NOT the Attorney General.

Where the personal liability had already been created by fraud committed in her name to conceal the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 in federal court and served to EVERY state attorney general. They had DEFAULTED.

Kathleen Kane, the person, faces full liability without immunity for the denial of the constitutional rights and INJUSTICE towards EVERY AMERICAN because fraud in her name concealed by confidentiality was committed to conceal the unconstitutionality of "Rule 1.6 Confidentiality".

Rule 1.6 INJUSTICE and CORRUPTION. ... has been enacted in EVERY state. AMERICAN INJUSTICE.
Only the American Bar Association has the resources and motivation and the 'judiciary' and membership to overthrow government. Edward Snowden saw so much more than Americans have been told.



Available in EVERY state each with it's own flavor but called the same name - RULE 1.6 Confidentiality of Information - SO UNCONSTITUTIONAL IT MIGHT COME CLOSE TO KILLING YOU! (but it won't because that would require disclosure.)


Since 1998, the 'Federal'-style has been 'the secret indulgence you gotta taste to believe" of government investigators and lawyers in every department and agency.

Copyright 1984-2009 & 2015 by The American Bar Association. Strictly and Aggressively enforced.
Violation will be alleged to DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA, DHS, DEA, The Secret Service and local and state law enforcement (intermittently, concurrently and chaotically).

Made available through the state supreme courts. See where your state joined the INJUSTICE!

with apologies to Oprah. You're being sued. And You're being sued. And You're being sued.

The volume of correspondence being prepared this week is daunting. Their injustice clock runs on billable hours. Time slows when every hope becomes a further injustice and corruption. Where isolated from family and the milestones which build into a life, time stops.

Those who offer the Facebook meme versions of Let It Go, Get Over It, Move On, This Too Shall Pass... have failed to recognize I am surviving, nothing more. THIS TOO SHALL PASS was wrong in 2007. You did not believe me, trust my judgement, the logical fail, my rationale... they played you against me. Friendships waned.

No one wants to live a life void of joy where other people's smiles make you wonder if you will ever have cause to smile again. Somehow, I persevere.

---

I have never done anything where the sole intent was to demonstrate that failure of a system or the person involved. That was always a consequence within their own control. I had no ability to cause people to do the right thing. At best, I could provide them the opportunity. Every response provided the chance for explanations which were not provided, or were deliberately concealed.

A stranger lies. The lie is contrary to reason and lacking any necessity or motivation. When asked to explain, they panic acting fearful and threatened - - You made no threat, but someone else has. When asking for an explanation, the answer "I need my job" demonstrates the intimidation involved. Their supervisors never responded. Everything - ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING - and EVERYONE at the courthouse was 'affected' by the corruption and injustice... and fearful of exposing it further. They knew the retaliatory realities of judges and lawyers. I was learning that reality.

Every proceeding and action in the divorce from 2007 forward had been affected - manipulated by secrecy, failure to apply the law, no explanations, no resolutions. Every injustice was a FARCE which when exposed resulted in the recusal of the judge and another judfge assigned. Twenty Judges have been directly involved in the matter with each sacrificing their integrity for the failure of the prior judges - mandated by Rule 1.6.

Farce is not an overly broad generalization. It is fact. Evidence is the court record, the hundred of documents filed.

I was being prosecuted/terrorized to the fullest extent of every law and court order and defending against every false allegation held accountable to know and follow every procedure and law. Any, every and All failures by my wife, and her attorneys, to follow the law, procedures, due process, court orders, courtroom protocol were excused without consequence or warning for continued failures. Their deliberate failures lead to the situation which is undeniable. The judge to issued an order in the clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction, a defective and void order which is void ab initio, evidence is clearly demonstrated in 'the court record'. BUT the lawyers still present the defective order for enforcement... successfully... even on appeal, successfully... leveraging the exposure of the corruption of the court for further injustice while preventing any resolution. Rule 1.6 Injustice. FOREVER.

Everything was undermined by the necessity to NOT REVEAL the secret, or prevent discovery. EVER. No law. No rights. No justice. None. EVER. FOREVER. No kidding. FOREVER. Another reality to learn because no one would believe it. Myself included.

The Rule 1.6 mandate of non-disclosure and confidentiality survives the death of the attorney. Forever.

Believe it. No justice. No escape. Ever. Forever.

---

Those who continue to undermine the US Constitution have been (and will be) compelled to public actions which they will not be able to deny or ignore or conceal or obfuscate. "Through their own words, they will be exposed." If one person had done the right thing at anytime, the situation would not have been able to continue. No one helped. So many people working against me in violation of the law and procedures. What could possibly cause so many people to fail without explanation or reason... It's their fault I found RULE 1.6 which undermined everyone and everything and every law including the US Constitution.

The law is clear about who may be held responsible for their failures to perform the responsibilities of their government office and whether they may be litigated professionally and PERSONALLY.

I have no other alternative but to present the illegal actions to persons who are in government positions where they recognize the corruption of the judiciary and DO NOTHING to address the wrongdoing. The lawyers and non-lawyers have no long term protection by and through an unconstitutional law and the corruption concealed by it.... except that the entire government has participated and concealed the corruption of the undermined judiciary under the false impression that it is better than addressing the problem.... which is HUGE.

Americans must set pride aside, acknowledge the past injustice and rectify the government for the future.

Every. Person. Matters.

"The truth is sometimes a hard pill to swallow. It sometimes causes us difficulties at home and abroad. It is sometimes used by our enemies in attempts to hurt us. But the American people are entitled to it, nonetheless." - Sen. John McCain

By its terms, US Section 1983 imposes liability without defense on state and local officials who, acting under color of law in their individual capacity, deprive plaintiffs of rights created by the Constitution and federal law.

The Problem arises where Rule 1.6 being unconstitutional is No Law. A nullity.
IT WAS, UNTIL IT ISN'T. AND THEN, it never was.

Unconstitutional secret secrecy is Rule 1.6 INJUSTICE.

While Rule 1.6 is mandating a conspiracy to deprive a person of rights and requiring the participation (or inaction or disinformation) of everyone required to follow it, there is no excuse in the 'Liability Game' for the actions which clearly deprive a person of their rights by a person who is sworn to protect their rights and who knows that their own actions are unconstitutional and repugnant.

PROFESSIONALLY - certain immunities apply to the organizations and officials involved in government, PERSONAL LIABILITY is another issue where a person knows better and has the responsibility to effect a change. The LAW has allowances built into the construction of the law which addresses the purpose and explains the reasoning and the proper application for the judiciary. No law violates the US Constitution.

The government is constitutional where allowing for review of constitutional questions by the judiciary. The Public Trusts the Judiciary. A necessity so essential that they trusted it would not be violated. Corrupt judges were hung because we trusted them.

A problem exists where there is no way to tell the judiciary that A LAW THE JUDICIARY ENACTED is unconstitutional. Done outside the normal legislative construction of a law, there was no construct, no explanation, no review, no reasoning, ... and no legislative immunity for the authors. The law mandating non-disclosure and confidentiality did not permit ANY lawyer to address the unconstitutional aspect or effects, and concealed fraud in the furtherance to prevent the situation from being rectified or exposed.

Injustice has thrived based on disinformation which distracts from the problem law. A perceived prideful judicial arrogance is leveraged while interference with the administration of justice conceals the violation of the public trust and the loss of judicial independence. Two essential elements have been surreptitiously removed from the US Justice system - the known point of failure was always the judiciary. The judiciary had been undermined and held hostage by the American Bar Association by a law which required that information be concealed... that the violation of the public trust be concealed... the loss of judicial independence was concealed... everything they were doing to conceal it was also concealed. Everything leveraged to the benefit of their membership - who had no idea how it broke, but knew something was not right. Everyone noticed the government was 'ignoring' the US Constitution.

When an individual person is participating in actions which they know to be wrong, and quite UNCONSTITUTIONAL, the law expects and requires them to do the right thing. They can be held professionally and personally responsible for their actions, or the failure to act, even where an unconstitutional law had them violate a person's rights.

The US Constitution does not provide any allowance for the denial of rights protected by the US Constitution. Any law which attempts to deny rights is No Law, a nullity, and provides no protection for participation in unconstitutional acts.

But, you must bring the case to the Judiciary. The judiciary who enacted the unconstitutional law, the nullity, in violation of the US Constitution AND THE CONSTITUTION OF EVERY STATE. You must bring the humiliatingly embarrassing case of AMERICAN INJUSTICE to those responsible for the INJUSTICE.

ONE OTHER THING, that unconstitutional law, Rule 1.6, mandates that they do nothing to expose that unconstitutional aspect. Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure by judges, lawyers or legal professionals. Rule 1.6 permits/requires further acts of fraud to prevent exposure, or where disclosure would rectify the matter.

Rule 1.6 permits/requires the failure to indicate that Rule 1.6 is the reason that you cannot have justice pursuant to Rule 1.6. Rule 1.6 will undermine the law and the courts while any attempt is made to address the unconstitutional results.

PENNSYLVANIA - The judiciary shut down the Attorney General in defiance of law, procedures, separation of powers, etc... They clearly realized that it was not just about the inappropriate relationships which delayed the prosecution of Jerry Sandusky, Kathleen Kane was about to blow the lid off of the INJUSTICE game - NATIONALLY! Two cases which by law required the Attorney General's attention as an unconstitutional state law would be demonstrated in the appeals. In the Superior Court of Pennsylvania - Healy v Healy and Healy v Miller.

For example. You own a house. That house is illegally sold. The law is clear. If you have possession, you file QUIET TITLE. If you do not have possession, you file EJECTMENT. You file Ejectment and it is dismissed because you do not have possession. An error in application of law. On Appeal, it is affirmed. No Reconsideration. The judiciary neglects to address the proper law, neglects to apply that law to the situation, and neglects to address the issue. The 'elephant in the room', INJUSTICE, is being concealed pursuant to Rule 1.6. The court is mandated to conceal that Rule 1.6 is causing further Rule 1.6 injustice. It defies logic. It defies common sense. They write pages, yet miss the mark. BECAUSE, the unconstitutional law requires that the unconstitutional law not be disclosed. To conceal the judicial quagmire, the court staff intercepts and intervenes handling the matter without the involvement of the judiciary. Are the staff protecting the judges from the liability for unconstitutional actions? ... or holding the judiciary hostage by preventing the judge from the decision? The criminal, and unconstitutional, interception and interference with the administration of justice and the forgery and fraud by the court staff are in the furtherance of a fraud, Non-Disclosure is mandated pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality. The court staff are professional lawyers who know their actions are violating the state and federal law and the US Constitution. Where the court may not have believed when you indicated that the case would expose a constitutional issue, their own unconstitutional actions quickly convinces them. (CONSIDER: Secret Order/Unidentified Court which prevents investigation and responsibilities of the Office of the Attorney General. Where an unconstitutional law is a nullity, a court order must be followed while appealed even when improper, unlawful and unconstitutional. The 'secret' court order creates a liability, professionally and personally, for the Attorney General who is being required by court order to participate in a conspiracy to deny constitutionally protected rights. Multiple actions to silence Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane are carefully exposed to the media. Without any allowance for explanation, the Attorney General must be silent or risk a contempt action for violating the court order. Two court orders - one for each appeal in Superior Court. GRAND JURY SECRECY becomes an issue where allegations are 'leaked' suggesting violations by Kathleen Kane, personally and professionally as Attorney General. No explanations or details. Speculation is widespread misdirection, it is no coincidence that my cases are in Montgomery County. CALL FOR IMPEACHMENT: A call is made to the Legislature to impeach Kathleen Kane for non-enforcement of an unconstitutional law - the Marriage issue - and the 'speculation' of the Grand Jury leaks. EVERYTHING IS ABOUT THE SILENCING OF KATHLEEN KANE - under whom the 'monkeywrench' was thrown which undermined a Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 in the federal courts after every state attorney general intentionally defaulted. A very similar situation where everything was handled by the court staff without any evidence of judicial involvement. Reported to the US Marshalls and the DOJ, US Attorney general Eric Hodler and US Attorney Zane Memeger. SILENCE.) Prosecution of the court staff would expose the unconstitutional effect of Rule 1.6 which has resulted in YOUR loss of any protection under the law AND loss of rights protected by the US Constitution. No PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW. NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. NO KIDDING. The Crimes and Constitutional offenses were reported. I am still awaiting the investigation by 1) Zane Memeger, US Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania 2) Seth Williams, District Attorney for Philadelphia 3) David Heckler, District Attorney for Bucks County 4) Kathleen Kane, Pennsylvania Attorney General 5) USPS, United States Postal Inspectors - Mail Fraud 6) the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Their silence is unexplained. AG Kathleen Kane couldn't even say WHY she is being silent.

The Silence of Lawyers regarding an unconstitutional law which results in INJUSTICE, leaving people with no protection under the law while denying and ignoring rights protected and secured by the US Constitution with no opportunity for relief or resolution.

The Rules of Professional Conduct require lawyers to report this to the Judiciary. It is the law. If they did, it was not disclosed at any level. Rule 1,6 non-disclosure trumps that requirement. Rule 1.6 trumps every law, every constitution, every reform and mandates that it be concealed and any explanation prevented.



THAT IS WRONG. Ask a lawyer... but, they probably won't tell you. (At best you may hear 'attorney-client privilege' blah blah. It's not called attorney-client privilege. It is called Confidentiality of Information.)

AS FOR THE NEWS MEDIA??? Draw your own conclusions about the control of the news media in the US.

THE PENNSYLVANIA LEGISLATURE HAS THE ONLY AUTHORITY TO SUSPEND A LAW WITHIN THE COMMONWEALTH OF PA. While they not acting on the 'worst kept secret in Pennsylvania' people are suffering an incomprehensible injustice which is difficult to explain and they are killing themselves. Suicide is logical where there is no hope.

Where there may seem to be no hope, there is still a Constitution of the United States of America. Somewhere along the way, the Judiciary neglected the trust placed in them by the People. The Public Trust - The lawyers ripped of it's head. shit down it's throat and raped it leaving it for dead. Big mistake. HUGE. EVERY PERSON MATTERS.

The list of available immunities is considerably longer than one might believe. Judicial Immunity, Absolute Immunity, Absolute Judicial Immunity, Prosecutorial Immunity, Witness Immunity, Legislative Immunity, Qualified Immunity (Executive Officials), Established Law, Reason and Discretion. One thing which they all have in common... THERE IS NO IMMUNITY FOR VIOLATING THE CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED RIGHTS OF AMERICAN PEOPLE.

What has been happening is that Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information has prevented disclosure of the constitutional violations and prevented resolution of the crimes where it would expose that they are keeping a secret pursuant to their secret Rule 1.6 - which hides in plain site buried by cross references throughout the Rules of Professional Conduct - a minimum ethical standard which lacks ethics, morality and lawfulness - presented to every state Supreme Court and enacted into law at the behest of the American Bar Association.

The American Bar Association knew what they were doing when they deliberately removed the fraud provisions from Rule 1.6 in 1983. INJUSTICE IS A GOLDMINE - the ABA membership is the beneficiary to their unconstitutional law which holds a judiciary hostage - removing judicial independence from the judge and requiring injustice continue unexplained without resolution.

To the ABA,
Close your doors now. Shut Down your corrupt and seditious organization... including the affiliates in every jurisdiction of state and federal judiciary. You tried to save the integrity of your profession by writing a code of ethical conduct, and you deliberately failed - at a considerable profit for some members but sacrificing any integrity, respect or honor for the remainder.

Rule 1.6 Peek-A-Boo Injustice cannot be concealed by an apathetic population who does not want to believe or accept that 48 million people lost their homes, thousands of children were jailed in Luzerne County, and people were murdered in Ferguson and New York without anyu opportunity for JUSTICE, or any relief from further injustice.

To the government officials who, once notified, are personally and professionally liable for their participation in the conspiracy to deny Americans of constitutionally protected rights.

Do you really want me to bring you all into a courtroom to demonstrate Rule 1.6 INJUSTICE again. I have the confirmations of receipt by every state attorney general, every state governor, every senator in every state, the US Congress, the entire Pennsylvania Legislature, every sheriff in Pennsylvania, every judge in every court in Bucks and Montgomery Counties... It's not called the 'worst kept secret in Pennsylvania' for nothing.


Is it your preference that Rule 1.6 be demonstrated in a courtroom before your very eyes... To see no protection under the law? To see denial of constitutional rights?

"They can't do that" going over and over in your head. "The judges are NOT supposed to do that." "They are ignoring the law, the constitution, civil rights, human rights, ... They can't do that. BUT, THEY DID. He was correct. He has no protection under the law and every constitutional right is being ignored. Why? The judge just threw his case out of court but didn't indicate a reason, and explanation or any support in applicable law. Rule 1.6 Confidentiality does not permit the judge to indicate that the current injustice was necessitated to conceal prior injustice pursuant to Rule 1.6 - - to conceal prior injustice before that... and before that... Rule 1.6 has broken and undermined the entire judiciary and JUSTICE. Improper law? enacted by Judiciary without authority? no review for constitutionality? not constructed as law? no legislature? no governor signed it? enacted in every state? included in federal district courts (Local Rules)? included in federal Court of Appeals (Local Rules)? mandated to every federal government lawyer (McDade-Murtha Amendment)? Did no one realize that the ABA Rule - the ethical standard for lawyers - lack ethics? morality? legality? or was every lawyer mandated to non-disclosure by Rule 1.6 and prevented from explaining what they meant to Congress when they indicated that McDade Murtha would have a disastrous result for the country. Did Rule 1.6 prevent the lawyers testifying before Congress from indicating that the state ethics laws lacked any ethics? ... and permitted, endorse and required lawyers to participate in fraud in the furtherance of fraud? ... even where it would rectify a prior fraud? ... preventing every federal government lawyer from any action which exposes, investigates or prosecutes judicial corruption and injustice within the state courts... in every state ... even where constitutional rights are concerned. Your lawyer just congratulated you on the 'BIG WIN' ...but you are not permitted to discuss the issue ... or the case pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality ... if you do, you would be prosecuted for your part in a conspiracy to deny the constitutional rights of an American ... your hearing would not be publicized ... your accidental suicide will be on the front pages - 'Defender of the Constitution' (This ironic award title is a standard practice by the American bar Association.... sometimes there's cash too.) It's just not even funny when it is true.

By neglect you encourage endorse and conceal an egregious violation of the Public Trust which harms Americans.
There is no valid excuse for unconstitutional acts. That is treason.

The non-lawyer Legislators have an obligation to every American which cannot be ignored by an unconstitutional law.
The non-lawyer legislators cannot ask their lawyers to advise them while their lawyers are obligated to commit fraud to conceal the injustice.

It is so wrong... affecting so many people... there is no argument offered ... no explanation... no justification,... no apology.

Surprise America!! - Your country was overthrown by lawyers 30 years ago. About fucking time you noticed. eh?

Americans must set pride aside, acknowledge the past injustice and rectify the government for the future.
Every. Person. Matters.

SHUT RULE 1.6 DOWN NOW. Suspend this unconstitutional law and vaccinate the entire country... so this never happens again.

I will "GO FULL OPRAH" commencing litigation against every government official that ignored this matter for the last 9 years. Silence and Non-response will not provide any defense or immunity when you are on the wrong side of the US Constitution.

Where the courts sacrifice integrity to conceal the injustice, everyone loses.

The only person getting paid will be your lawyer who is relying on his non-disclosure and license for fraud in the furtherance to conceal the constitutional violation of his client.

As a person without any protection of the law and experiencing the denial of rights protected by the constitution, I have no choice but to persevere. I have demonstrated my ability to persevere through injustice since 2007.

County Court documents and transcripts were not available or presented for the recent appeal. The 'court' ignored without explanation.

A mountain of evidence seems to have been concealed by Montgomery County, a grand jury investigation may have been misdirected by a special prosecutor with a potential conflict of interest (being married to a judge and President of the Montgomery County Bar Association resulting in the unavailability of the evidence.

The failure of a prolonged investigation designed and determined to destroy a man which prevented any protections under the law while excessive and improper informants, handlers, private investigators, and detective shared surveillance products throughout the courts and every level of law enforcement contributed the inability of law enforcement to correct the errors and wrongdoing.

Secrecy is the thing that makes every evil far worse than it would have been.

The damage continues while I am denied any life, protection of the law and constitutional rights.

A JUDGE COVERED FOR A LAWYER WHO TOLD HER CLIENT TO COMMIT A FEDERAL CRIME.
The efforts to conceal their injustice (court order found in 2010 after 3 years) has been an evil far worse than the initial injustice.

Twenty (20) judges, multiple courts. multiple appeals, federal constitutional challenges, every level of state and federal law enforcement, state and federal government, all prevented from any effort to help by a secrecy which overwhelmed and intimidated.

Only a sociopath, who was a lawyer, could have calculated and manipulated every situation and liability into one unconstitutional law - which mandates silence and permits continued terror.

Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane:

I am coming to pry open your secret court orders. We have not spoken a single word to each other, yet I believe in you still.

My belief in people is the source of my perseverance, and my challenge to trust again.

Americans must set pride aside, acknowledge the past injustice and rectify the government for the future.
Every. Person. Matters.

Every. Person. Matters. War on INJUSTICE.

Excuse me. Um. I think I am lost. Do you enjoy destroying people? I just want to understand. I want to know what drives a person to do what you do. To ruin other people's lives...
... because you have taken everything from me. Abuse of Power under Color of Law... which lead me to THAT LAW which perverts justice and undermines the entire government.

You have manipulated a very strong team to assist you in your efforts which violate the Public Trust and is concealed. You have ripped the head off of Justice and shit down her throat.

You fail to understand. EVERY. PERSON. MATTERS. There are more of us than there are of you.

Rule 1.6 provides the ability to conceal the abuse of power under color of law. The unconstitutional nullity is NO LAW... and NO SECRET... anymore.

You are the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION. An organization which interferes and intervenes to cause injustice and prevent any escape. A membership which has intruded and intercepted at every level of the judiciary to perpetrate unconstitutional acts while concealed behind a judiciary held hostage. There are more of us than there are of you.

The actions of the ABA membership to prevent JUSTICE are exposed. Two secret orders from unidentified courts which silence and prevent Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane from the responsibilities and duties of her office will not stop an awareness of the corruption caused and concealed by RULE 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION of the Rules of Professional Conduct - a minimum ethical standard which lack any ethics - permitting non-disclosure in the furtherance of fraud or to prevent resolution. INJUSTICE endorsed by SILENCE. A Mandatory Silence.

Rule 1.6 is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. JUSTICE IS COMING.

---

"I’ve seen it happen numerous times and I marvel at how the “bully” doesn’t see it."

"a person who spends his/her professional life figuring how to [screw] others…”

"a seasoned veteran of investigations and multi-faceted prosecutions that take months, if not years, to build, and hundreds of hours to prepare)" - with a twisted and perverted sense of paranoia because their injustice has been excused.

EXPOSED. "What is in doubt is how badly, and what the fallout will be."

"Career lawmen think strategically. They don’t go for the immediate gratification of a personal attack, instead preferring to set the board up just right and striking at the precise moment where the object of the attack cannot recover."

"I’ve witnessed a long line of politicians who have picked fights like this for short term personal or political benefit. I can’t recall any that have managed to avoid being hurt far more seriously for having done so."

"The moral: don’t pick a political fight against someone schooled in how to really hurt you."

There are more of us than there are of you.

The weapon of injustice, Rule 1.6, is revealed. An unconstitutional, improper, manipulative fraud. Repugnant to the principles and beliefs upon which the United States was founded.

Every. Person. Matters.

Every. Person. Matters. JUSTICE IS COMING.

---

The Quotes come from a manifesto written by an apparently angry and frightened man upon learning his efforts to undermine an attorney general had a setback. A prosecutor for 22 years, including two terms as District Attorney, who has served as President of the Pennsylvania District Attorneys Association, Bruce Castor believes he has attained a sterling reputation for pursuing truth, justice, and accountability in public office. He is the only person who believes his lie.

Castor was Montgomery County District Attorney when A Terroristic Divorce was initiated in 2007. It seems every oerson to whom I turned for help were the ones who were already working to destroy me - unable to tell the truth - unable to end my terror. Because of an unconstitutional law which prevented them from doing the right thing. EVER.

Unconstitutional Nullity: Peek-a-boo... Justice is Coming

Freedom is IMPORTANT. Constitutional rights are IMPORTANT.

If your solution violates either My Freedom or the US Constitution, then YOU have some more work to do.

Freedoms and Rights can coexist.

Once permitted to infringe upon each other, it is a slippery slope.
(OY! I hate cliche's but no better choice there.)

I am grateful for the effort by the founders of the US, because in today's 140 char or less environment they would never have been allowed to think in a broad sense which permits freedom and rights to co-exist.

Their archived papers and documents explained the basis for their decisions, and the aspects which they wrestled with to come to the decision. They exerted considerably more thought while founding the American Government than people expect. It was not haphazard. Decisions were not reached by exhausting the person who did not agree. Only one known and argued issue seems to have been conceded while it left the government at risk.

One issue which was a necessity left a loophole in the separation of powers. They did foresee the problem, but did not imagine that it would ever occur. They got it wrong. Very wrong.

By permitting the Judicial branch to self-police, the administration of justice, and the independence of the judiciary and the reasons which necessitated absolute judicial immunity all pivoted on one point of failure - THE PUBLIC TRUST.

The Public Trust in the judiciary is mandated by law. Respect towards the judicial branch is mandated by law.

The courts were open rooms in the centers of towns. Justice was transparent and open to the public. The public could witness proceedings. When necessary, where the trust placed in the judiciary was violated, the public would remove a judge from office. Occasionally by hanging. Justice was swift. Violations of the Public Trust could not be permitted to continue and erode the entire system of justice and government..

It was this type of violation of the public trust which endorsed and enabled apartheid to persist in South Africa. Their judiciary jailed the outspoken without regard for their own injustice.

When South Africa wrote their new Constitution in the 90's, they made certain that the judicial branch was accountable to the people and the Executive and Legislative branches of government, and not just to the judicial branch. They recognized the problem which existed in the US, once corrupted the judiciary find justice in permitting injustice to continue.


THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT
(because trust, honor and respect is mandated by law)

The judiciary did not recognize Rule 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION for the pervasive corruption it would permit, cause, enable and conceal.

Once under the control of Rule 1.6, with the leverage of exposing the violation of the public trust concealed by the judiciary, the American Bar Association had effectively usurped the authority and independence of the judiciary. The ABA then manipulated the authority of the courts over lawyers and legal professionals, even in other branches of government. Where Rule 1.6 expanded to affect federal lawyers, Rule 1.6 undermined the jurisdiction and authority of the Federal Government to act to address corruption within the state. Rule 1.6 required active participation in the conspiracy and the injustice.

The McDade Murtha Amendment which prevents the exposure of Rule 1.6 by government lawyers was enacted against the objections of several US Attorneys General, and DOJ officials. It would have been so simple had they only informed the Congress of the central issue. Applying the ethical standard enacted within the state to all government lawyers would cause considerable damage to the government.

The Rules of Professional Conduct lacked ethics, permitted fraud and the efforts to conceal fraud and prevent resolution. The US Congress never checked to see if the state ethics laws were ethical. Pennsylvania describes the Rules as a minimal ethical standard. Minimal is none. Points for not lying about the law which would require their silence about the corruption it would cause.

Did the state law, Rule 1.6 prevent exposing that state ethics laws lacked ethics? even where the country was about to mandate all government attorneys to follow the 'Rules' within the respective state where they were investigating and working? even where it denied constitutionally protected rights?

Apparently, the lawyers who foreclosed upon over 48 million homes using fraudulent and forged robo-signed documents were confident that their corruption of the authority of the judiciary had been successful.

The big injustices, the little injustices all combine to create a sense of national urgency. Injustice is occurring across the country. The US Constitution is being ignored. One law enacted in every state affects every case secretly, confidentially. Promotion to law was begun in 1984, generations of lawyers find this 'acceptable' because they were mandated to conceal the problem if they discovered it. Trained to perceive Rule 1.6 as attorney-client privilege, and neglecting the affect on the law, justice and the judiciary.... even while it undermined and usurped the authority of the other branches of government.

When recognized by PA Attorney General Kathleen Kane, an unconstitutional law would not be effective to silence her, The courts issues several secret court orders. AG Kane is silenced while those corrupt orders are under appeal.... and while it undermines the constitutional rights of every American.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 removes an unconstitutional law and restores justice to the entire country. Discovered by victims of injustice with standing to address the unconstitutional effect of the 'law'. Without the assistance, or cooperation, of any legal professional or member of the American Bar Association and affiliated organizations formed in every jurisdiction at every level of state and federal courts.

Hindered from the effort by legal professionals within the state and federal government mandated to follow the unconstitutional law, the government lawyers knew better and cannot be excused from damages and repartations for their participation in the denial of the rule of law and prevention of rights secures by the US Constitution.

Did those secret court orders require Kathleen Kane to file for divorce in an attempt to secure her personal assets? Is that why those lawyers are representing 'the person' Kathleen Kane (and not the Office of the Attorneyh General)?

The laws work when not prevented by an unconstitutional requirement to conceal injustice in every state and federally.

If your solution violates either My Freedom or the US Constitution, then you have some more work to do.

If their defense is that they were following the law, then they need to recall that an unconstitutional law is no law, a nullity, as if it never existed. It can no longer be obstructed by an unconstitutional law mandating non-disclosure and confidentiality and participation in a conspiracy to deny constitutional rights.


A nullity cannot conceal a nullity.

A nullity cannot justify or excuse a nullity.

PEEK-a-Boo... JUSTICE IS COMING.

Peek-a-boo Pennsylvania!

Governor Wolf and the Legislature can act now, or after a federal lawsuit is filed against them?

Those who know better ought to know better than to continue their participation in a conspiracy to deny the constitutional rights of every American in every state. EVERY PERSON MATTERS.

Pwennsylvania, whatcha gonna do?

Fake Documents Provide No Protection and Create Peril

The repeated filing of fraudulent documents by Genuine Title Company does not change anything about the fraudulent conveyance of MY PROPERTY.

The improper ruling by the Miller's friend GAIL WEILHIEMER fails to indicate that they own the house. It only says that the issue is dismissed. Improperly done and with no basis in law. Keeping me homeless and their family in a perilous situation.

PERIL: ... because they may attempt to set me up for their murders. We are dealing with twisted law enforcement so clearly bent on perverting truths based on their poorly thought out fiction. The Miller family is at risk from the known sociopaths in the County.

There's is no safety or security in fraud. There is great peril in exposure and massive county efforts to conceal a crime.

There is no lawfulness attained by repeated filing of fraudulent documents with the Recorder of Deeds. Certainly not when the ROD knows that the fraudulent conveyance crime occurred... ROD referred the case to the FBI... ROD referred the case to the County Detectives... ROD knows the county corruption which creates the 'madman' and pushes him to act. ROD doesn't validate or verify. ROD records even when they know the documents are fraud.

Over 40 Million Foreclosures

Over 40 million foreclosures nationwide were based on forged and robosigned fraudulent documents presented by lawyers and title companies and upheld in courts mandated to confidentiality under Rule 1.6 - permitting fraud in the furtherance of fraud - mandating non-disclosure. - preventing efforts to rectify. Those 'fraud provisions' removed from the minimum ethical standard - Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Written and promoted by the American Bar Association whose members profited as they stole people's homes.

"Career lawmen think strategically. They don’t go for the immediate gratification of a personal attack, instead preferring to set the board up just right and striking at the precise moment where the object of the attack cannot recover." - Bruce Castor
 

The lawyers from Zarwin, Baum, DeVito, Kaplan, Schaer & Toddy presented no rights to ownership and had no defense - a situation which would result in sanctions - yet, the matter was dismissed. On Appeal is became even more evident and involved more 'judges' who covered for the lawyers who acted without any basis and could face sanctions and damages. BUT the judges took no part in it.

The forged documents filed by the court staff without judicial review showed the interference with the administration of justice and other constitutional offenses. Reported to multiple law enforcement agencies -county, state and federal levels. The issue is pending. The silence grows louder and louder.

These are the corrupt acts which place people and their family in peril and at risk. The efforts to cover up the crimes is often greater than the initial crime and continues until someone is dead.

A person protecting their own property is a stand your ground situation... only if they own the property. Trespassers have no property rights and may be dealt with accordingly.

Bear in mind, the corrupt law enforcement folks don't give a damn about the lives of the people they use to manipulate their corruption. Those they cause to be killed only serve to provide a false grandstand decked out in red white and blue with a District Attorney at the microphone spouting rhetoric without facts... attacking and assassinating the character of the puppet they created.

A dead family gives them the headlines they crave and the audience who falls for their theater of self-righteousness. The six people who were murdered by Bradley Stone are not available to tell you about their success in court and the great efforts of the county personnel who caused their deaths... and who went home from work and celebrated their holidays with their families.

With everyone dead, the County never even have to prove that Bradley Stone did it. Case closed.

"Career lawmen think strategically. They don’t go for the immediate gratification of a personal attack, instead preferring to set the board up just right and striking at the precise moment where the object of the attack cannot recover." Former District Attorney Bruce Castor. In his New Years Eve manifesto written days before he announced he was running for the position of District Attorney again. The same position he held when Healy v Healy began in 2007.

The efforts to undermine me continue... I am sane. I have the paperwork to prove that. The continued efforts to attempt to have someone assigned power of attorney to conceal the crimes is not unnoticed. It's not even cleverly calculated and executed. The local Warrington police seem to have had enough of being improperly used and manipulated into the corrupt games of Montgomery County. They know what is happening. They have been informed of every development. Every false report involving them has been addressed without hesitation or delay. The lengths that corrupt Montgomery County officials and officers will go to has no limit.

I am capable of perseverence.
They are capable of far more heinous acts.

The Terror of a Constant Threat

The recipient of Rule 1.6 injustice has no protection of the law. Their constitutional rights are ignored by the courts and law enforcement. All legal professionals are prevented from helping or doing anything to resolve ANY situation. Triggered by an act of judicial misconduct, Rule 1.6 secretly and silently undermines a litigant while attempting to conceal the injustice of a judge and protect the integrity of the judiciary.

There is no opportunity to succeed in a court. Without the rule of law and while constitutional rights are being ignored, survival is the best possible outcome - - BUT the victim does not know that and arrives in court... Prepared. Researched. Documented. Properly executed. Procedures followed. Yet, the victim leaves court battered and further threatened and terrified by the experience of the inexplicable actions of a corrupted court. The court provides no explanations for their injustice. Rule 1.6 Confidentiality applies.

The ONLY person in the courtroom who believes in 'the justice system' is the unwitting target who trusts it. Everyone else knows that there will be no justice. The lawyers, the judges, the court staff, the deputies observe the corruption and injustice. They witness justice. Intimidated by corruption, THEY RECOGNIZE WHEN A PROCEEDING IS A FARCE.

A FARCE. Every proceeding. For years.

In hindsight, it is clear and undeniable. Procedures are not followed. Protocol is abandoned. The law is ignored. Rights protected by the US Constitution are unavailable. Court Orders are not enforced. Only their victim is swiftly held to a stringent adherence to every procedure, protocol, law, and order. The victim must respond to and address and disprove each and every false allegation against them to survive it.

Robert Angst and Valerie Angst, the lawyers with education and a staff are excused from every failure. Their failures are deliberate. They serve to create an undercurrent of deliberate chaos. An ever increasing volume of issues to be presented. A cacophony of injustice which will 'annoy the living shit' out of the judge who knows that the entire thing is a complete farce. Angst & Angst made certain that they were protected from any backlash by a judge who ignored their every failure.

In the end, it is the document filed by Robert Angst to prevent any divorce decree from being issued 'pre-maturely' which exacerbates the procedural defect and a law deliberately constructed and enacted to assure litigants had the opportunity to be heard. Where neither party requested the entry of the divorce decree the court lacks authority and jurisdiction to enter an order. Robert Angst had filed a document indicating that a divorce decree should NOT be entered. Where neither party requested the entry of the Divorce Decree, and the Plaintiff through her lawyers indicated they did NOT want the entry of a divorce decree, Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio acted in the clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction.

The calculated actions of Angst & Angst neglected due process, procedure and law with intent. Those actions would appear to create a form of leverage whereby the judge might be lenient on their next failure. While every proceeding was pre-determined to deny any success to the hopeful victim, they were daring the judge to follow procedure and law. Sociopaths throwing the judge under the bus. By creating a 'clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction' for the judiciary, Angst & Angst were able to leverage judicial immunity for further injustice.

Absolute Judicial Immunity is provided to the judiciary even where the judicial actions of the judge…
… exceed their jurisdiction,
… are done maliciously or corruptly, or
… are flawed by grave procedural error.

THERE IS A SINGLE EXCEPTION. In order to lose immunity, there must be a clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction.

Where any judge strikes the defective and void order, they would be expose the liability of their benchmates. Angst & Angst again leverage the corruption of the judiciary and attempt to enforce a defective and void order. The Court complies with their extortion by COMPLETELY IGNORING THAT THE ORDER IS VOID AND COMPLETELY NEGLECTING THE CHALLENGE TO JURISDICTION. The terror of an 'unappealable order' which defies the attention of the court and threatens the life and liberty of the victim.

Why would there be twenty (20) judges involved in the matter of Healy v Healy? Imagine the shame and self-loathing which would occur when you are participating in a deliberate injustice, violating the trust of a litigant, a rouse to harass and terrify. Angst & Angst were doing everything possible to ensure that the judge excused and ignored enough of their wrong-doing to be identified as an active and involved participant. Those actions were being subsequently documented on the court record and were building a considerable volume of evidence.

Evidence of the procedural failures and the breach of protocol and violation of law are being presented in proceedings to enforce compliance with court orders - yet, the judge dismisses every matter without explanation. The judge can't tell the litigant that THE ENTIRE THING IS JUST A SHAM TO TERRORIZE A MAN. The judge is disgusted and just wants out. The judge's integrity is being sacrificed while Rule 1.6 prevents explanation or resolution or escape.

Where every judicial proceeding and action has been a complete sham. A performance whereby the victim is attacked again and again... because the victim survives, there will be further actions. NO ONE WILL STOP THEIR DESTRUCTIVE FARCE... Rule 1.6 allows fraud in the furtherance of fraud. Rule 1.6 does not permit disclosure to rectify the fraud. Rule 1.6 prevents every legal professional from helping.

Their 'FARCE' has denied life and liberty. Destroyed Financially. Isolated and divided family. Prevented custody and visitation. Left you unemployed, homeless and threatened with jail. Attached supporters bank accounts. Infiltrated all technology - your friends tech also. False friendships by Investigators and Informants. Required additional litigation, additional parties. Undermined an entire judiciary. Nine (9) years of my life. Prevented and denied any future relief or escape. THIS IS A DIVORCE. This is not a criminal case.

Only in the family courts can someone who has committed no crime lose everything.

WTF? I asked that in a letter to the Montgomery County Judiciary two months before I realized Rule 1.6 was the problem. There was no response.

The available resources, actions and efforts to terrorize their victim to being 1) homeless/destitute 2) incarcerated or 3) suicide are not as arbitrary as you might think. A review of documents which relate to good mental health practices when going through a stressful period demonstrates a disturbing strategy. Their litigation has been designed to undermine the target psychologically by removing or obstructing support and coping methods while isolating the victim. They are undermining emotional and mental health by directly inhibiting efforts which provide resilience.

Acting above the law without any sense of moral responsibility or social conscience they wrote a law which permitted every act against the target and prevented any escape. As long as the target is not going to be murdered, Rule 1.6 confidentiality mandates non-disclosure. Driving a target to suicide is an acceptable 'loophole'. Only a sociopath would design a system by which criminals were not permitted to kill, but permitted to bring about a suicide. Kutek would be horrified.

Lawyers rejected the 'fraud provisions' of Rule 1.6 against the prolonged debate and strong lobbying efforts of Robert Kutek while writing the code of ethical conduct for lawyers. Weeks after Kutek's sudden death in 1983, the fraud provisions were removed from Rule 1.6 and promoted by the American Bar Association to each state as an ethical standard while it's lack of ethics was inconsequential. In a clear contradiction to his legacy, the ABA refers to the committee responsible for the Rules of Professional Conduct as The Kutek Commission.

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality undermines the judiciary and every proceeding. The injustice grows while Rule 1.6 prevents resolution or escape from further actions. I would hope that my case is an extreme. My case demonstrates the broad affect of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality which prevents any remedy. It is the volume of information and experiences which lead to the discovery of the needle in the haystack of injustice. Where no explanation was offered... and no question answered... EVER. Rule 1.6 could be applied to 'justify' the silence.

Rule 1.6 non-disclosure is permitted to conceal Rule 1.6 non-disclosure. They won't say anything and won't tell you why... Rule 1.6 is permitted to be invoked without invoking it. Rule 1.6 makes it possible to break the law, commit acts in the furtherance of that fraud, undermine the integrity and independence of the judiciary, prevent exposure through further fraud AND NOT EVER INDICATE THAT RULE 1.6 is involved. Ex parte communications, letters and meetings which arrange the injustice and corruption are also Rule 1.6 Confidential.

Prevented from information and denied rights and the protection of the law, my experience may be extreme but it is not isolated or unique... Rule 1.6 is law in every state. A violation of the public trust by the Judicial branch. The judiciary are accorded respect and honor BY LAW because it is necessary for the People to trust in JUSTICE.

The American Bar Association's Rule 1.6 has leveraged the public trust to undermine the judiciary. The only folks who profit from injustice are the members of the ABA and its affiliated organizations.

THE SCANDAL OF RULE 1.6 IS BIG. VERY BIG. HUGE.

JUSTICE IS COMING.

Overthrow in Pennsylvania - Judicial overthrows Executive and Legislative!

The Judicial Branch has ordered the Executive Branch to cease any investigation or prosecution... to conceal the corruption and usurpation of the Judicial Branch.

ATTORNEY GENERAL KATHLEEN KANE's COURT ORDERED SECRECY

The Judicial Branch can't order the Executive Branch not to enforce the laws of the Legislative Branch. Doing so by threatening disciplinary action demonstrates a broad overreach of the Judicial branch and a violation of the Separation of Powers. What would make them attempt this type of improper unconstitutional action?

If Judicial wished to excuse the crime after a hearing, they would act at that time in their forum - a PUBLIC forum.

To prevent public exposure of their corruption a hearing must be averted. But, any effort to prevent investigation would be visible.

There is no method by which the judiciary can prevent the other two branches from their responsibilities.

The judicial effort to prevent exposure has been publicly exposed and concealed by secrecy...

PUBLICLY AND SECRETLY, the judicial branch has ordered the Attorney General to inaction using two secret orders from two secret courts.

PUBLICLY AND SECRETLY, there are several Grand Jury's at work. One is investigating the Attorney General, but the grand jury is a tool of the Executive branch. Why has the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania called for a Grand Jury lead by Thomas Carluccio?

A grand jury seeking to suppress evidence of the unconstitutional actions of the judiciary is investigating the Attorney General. Chief Justice Ron Castille called for this Montgomery County Grand Jury. It is being run by Thomas Carluccio, whose wife Judge Caryolyn Tornetta Carluccio has issued defective and void orders without proper subject matter jurisdiction. Those corrupt orders are at the center of Healy v Healy and Healy v Miller and will eventually be the subject of federal litigation against the entire county, and the 20 judges from the Montgomery County Bench - all have lost any immunity because of the actions of Carluccio. Their actions demonstrated the unconstitutional influence of Rule 1.6 on the courts and law enforcement. THOMAS CARLUCCIO IS THE ONLY ATTORNEY IN THE COUNTY WHO COULD NOT BE COMPELLED TO GIVE TESTIMONY AGAINST HIS WIFE. Who better to learn and suppress the evidence in a case against the county judiciary.

For the Judicial branch to act before a hearing demonstrates an improper influence and control over the other two branches of government dismissing the lawmaker and the law enforcer. An egregious and obvious breach of the separation of powers established in the Constitution.

Where the Executive and Legislative have been participating by concealing the improper usurpation and undermining of the Judicial branch held hostage by the American Bar Association, their silence and inaction has given way to a demonstration of the absolute overthrow of the state government.

The American Bar Association controlled Judiciary has clearly overthrown the entire state government and wielded an improper unlawful and unconstitutional authority which demands the immediate attention of the People and their elected representatives.

Note to US DOJ: This situation exists in every state rolled out by the ABA from 1984 through 2009.

Rule 1.6 is their power and their downfall

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information has concealed their conspiracy and corruption, but once exposed as an unconstitutional law, the Judicial Branch was without explanation. Once challenged with clear evidence of the violation of constitutionally protected rights, the Judiciary was prompted to actions which exposed their overreach of authority.

THE KEY is Rule 1.6 - an unconstitutional law enacted by the Judiciary. Where the Executive would investigate and discover and prove the unconstitutional law, it would demonstrate the actions of the judiciary to conceal that their authority had been usurped and undermined by the American Bar Association by and through their enacting Rule 1.6 into law.

Ordering the Executive Branch to avoid investigation of the issue, shows an overreach of Judicial authority.

The Judiciary calling a Grand Jury to silence the Attorney General shows an overreach of Judicial authority.

The Judicial Branch has demonstrated their overreach and violation of the state constitution.

The Legislature was already removed from authority where the state judiciary improperly enacted a law which affected substantive rights and denied constitutional protections. A clear violation of the state constitution Article V Section 10(c).

The Pennsylvania Legislature has been asked to suspend Rule 1.6 as they have the authority to suspend any law. The Judiciary Committees have neglected to present the issue to the entire Legislature.

Rule 1.6 was the necessity which enabled the misuse of judicial authority. Once exposed as an unconstitutional nullity, the evidence of the corruption and perversion of justice would no longer be concealed.

As Rule 1.6 had become the "worst kept secret in Pennsylvania", the Judicial Branch acted in the open to suppress the matter exposing their usurpation of the Executive and Legislative branches.

THAT EXPLAINS EVERYTHING.

To the People:

Intervention is necessary.

Remove the American Bar Association. The ABA has done this in every state and federally. Rule 1.6 unconstitutional injustice exists in every state.

Shut Down the American Bar Association and all affiliates at every level of county, state and federal court.

Their RULE 1.6 enabled caused and perpetuated the injustice within the state government of every state and federally. Their Rule 1.6 permitted them to unconstitutionally and unlawfully intercept and interfere with the administration of justice in every court.

In Pennsylvania, the District Attorneys have been tightly organized minions of corruption and injustice. Resignations are appropriate.

At the state level, the judicial branch must promptly be restricted as demonstrated by the Constitution adopted by South Africa after the years of Apartheid where the courts silenced and retaliated against anyone who disagreed or spoke out or attempted to assert their rights: constitutional, civil, human or otherwise.

JUSTICE IS COMING...

I agree with Attorney General Kathleen Kane. She is central to resolution of this issue. She has witnessed the corruption, how deep it goes and how powerful it is. She has reason to be confident of re-election.

Kathleen Kane will restore JUSTICE to the entire state and start a wave of JUSTICE across the entire country.

Kathleen Kane's Court Ordered Secrecy

Three Appeals will now be sent to the PA Supreme Court - with all three demonstrating the corruption and failure of the lower court AND the interception by the Superior Court Legal Staff - their fraudulent documents interfered with the administration of justice... and denied access to the court.

All three appeals neglected the deliberately defective and void order of Judge Carolyn Carluccio which lacked jurisdiction... still lacks jurisdiction... can never have jurisdiction... with a defect which causes a lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

The defect - failure to follow the PA law - cause a clear loss of subject matter jurisdiction. All circuits interpret Stump and Bradley to require a clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction in order to lose judicial immunity.

The deliberately defective and void order causes the loss of judicial immunity for the entire judiciary in Healy v Healy. 20 judges of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas. Where EVERY PROCEEDING AND ORDER since 2007 can be demonstrated to be undermined and leveraged by corruption and confidentiality mandated by Rule 1.6. Relitigate? No point. Recovery and escape from further their is a necessity. The case history demonstrates the affect of Rule 1.6 on my rights.

SUPERIOR COURT - CENTRAL LEGAL STAFF

Why would the Central Legal Staff not provide/deliver the appeal to the judges? To protect the judges from acting in a matter where they would have no judicial immunity.

So the Central Legal Staff intercepts and intervenes and acts to conceal the lower courts error, and the lower court's gross negligence when informed of the defect, and the lower court's continued malicious retaliation against the victim of their error.

There is no law which permits the Central Legal Staff to intercept and intervene. Their actions clearly deny due process and access to the court - constitutional violations. Any attempt to conceal their crimes pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality proves that Rule 1.6 causes the denial of constitutionally protected rights of litigant.

Where it denies constitutional rights, the substantive rights of a litigant have been affected demonstrating the lack of authority for the state Supreme Court to enact Rule 1,6 into law.

Rule 1.6 is an unconstitutional nullity - NOT A LAW.


PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL, KATHLEEN KANE

Where required by Rule 521 to notify the state Attorney general where the constitutionality of a law will come into question, PA Attorney General Kathleen Kane was notified of the three appeals in the Superior Court AND that the constitutionality of Rule 1,.6 would be called into question.

Filed in good faith, I did not expect the Central Legal Staff to demonstrate the unconstitutional affect of Rule 1.6.

Attorney General Kathleen Kane was subsequently ordered to silence by secret court orders from two different courts. The orders further prevented her from performing the functions and responsibilities of the Attorney General.

A Grand Jury called Kathleen Kane to testify under strict confidentiality which would prevent disclosure and investigative action by the attorney general.

The Norristown Grand Jury seeks to conceal the evidence of the extreme malicious corruption and cruelty of Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio in the matter of Healy v Healy.

The Grand Jury is being run by Special Prosecutor Thomas Carluccio. Had any other attorney been running the grand jury, they could be compelled to testify about the matter. A husband cannot be compelled to testify against his wife. The Norristown Grand Jury seeks to conceal the evidence.

Secret Order #1 was issued by the Superior Court of Pennsylvania demanding silence and non-participation of the attorney general. An act of judicial corruption and manipulation which prevents the attorney general from performing her job responsibilities and violates her oath of office.

Secret Order #2 was issued by the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas demanding silence and non-participation of the attorney general while seeking to determine the amount of information the attorney general already knew about Healy v Healy and the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 - and then requiring the information to be suppressed.

THE SECRET IS THAT INJUSTICE IS INESCAPABLE WHILE THE JUDICIARY VIOLATE THE PUBLIC TRUST TO PERPETUATE A CONSPIRACY OF CORRUPTION INITIATED BY THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION.

A secret order by a secret judge can not be secretly enforced... the judge and the court would have to reveal themselves to the public.. exposing their corruption to sunlight.

I believe it is time for Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane to break her silence.

I would hope she is joined by Attorney General Eric Holder and President Barack Obama.

I would hope they are supported by every state Attorney General - who have had their deliberate default action in the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 undermined and silenced.

I respectfully and sincerely request the support of every American to restore justice and the US Constitution.

Every. Person. Matters.
JUSTICE NOW.
Equality

In Defiance of All Logic - A Family Court Face Lift

A FAMILY COURT FACE LIFT
An Article by the Honorable Kelly C. Wall, with contributions and edits from Sarinia M. Feinman, Esq.
Published in SIDEBAR Summer 2014 by the Montgomery Bar Association, Montgomery County Pennsylvania.

This article defies logic in most of the aspects presented. The failure to see the full perspective of every party involved is clear. It seems that the writers are SO IMPRESSED WITH THEMSELVES AND THEIR CAREERS that they have completely ignored the reason they are involved in the first place. How does someone who sits on the Family Court Bench lose sight of the necessity and the people standing before them? And how do they introduce changes which fail to correct or address any of the issues presented. Promptly abandoning the statements presented in her Inquirer Judicial Candidate Questionaire in 2009. The Judicial Branch does NOT have authority to write (or re-write) law. Is the Legislature aware of these actions? Prepare for one convoluted clueless ego trip.

Prior to going on the family bench, I practiced family law for several years. I remember showing up at the judges’ courtroom for short list conferences; there were so many lawyers present in the Courtroom that it felt like a social hour. My fellow lawyers would sit and catch up on each other’s lives as we waited for our turn in the judges’ chambers. That was the perception I had when I was assigned to the Family Bench in January of 2010.

Boy was I shocked!

Shocked? Judge Wall had no knowledge or awareness about the working of the Family Court. Short List conferences are wasted days for the litigants and the lawyers. Unrepresented litigants are the last to be called. They wait the entire day observing 'the dance.' Lawyer & Lawyer go to the Judge's Chambers. Their unwelcome clients sit and wait. There is no record of the lawyers conference with the judge. Their clients have no idea what was discussed. Just an outcome, which is often an indication that the requested hearing will be scheduled. This is NOT the "transparent and open to the public" fable from Judge Wall's Election Questionnaire.

The first few months I kept questioning my staff about the whereabouts of the attorneys of record
for the conferences. I quickly learned that the days of litigants having two attorneys were gone and we were lucky if there were one or two cases on the list with even one attorney!

This took MONTHS to figure out? BTW, if it took MONTHS, it was not 'quickly learned'. The 'luck' has another name which is best explained by Canon 1. "A judge shall uphold and promote the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary, and shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety." The 'luck' indicates a lack of independence, integrity, and impartiality which improper or at least appears to be improper. The 'luck' contradicts Canon 1's duty of 'access to justice for all' that reflects adversely on the judge’s honesty, impartiality, temperament, or fitness to serve as a judge.

The dockets were littered with the names of attorneys who, long ago, were fired, replaced or simply not being paid. I soon discovered that the Family Court system was overwhelmed with self-represented parties. This problem was so pervasive that in 2013 a new rule was passed requiring Pro Se litigants to enter their appearances in support and custody cases if there was no active attorney.

Blame it on the litigants? Paying their lawyers to sit in a room for half a day at $300/hour doing nothing - or socializing. Perhaps that explains why the litigant fired, replaced or did not pay their attorney. $300/hour to socialize. Seriously? Filing an appearance is one page. Name. Address. Phone Number. Signature. This filing would not overwhelm a second grade student. Blame the unrepresented litigants? Require more from the unrepresented litigants than from the lawyers. Falsely suggest that you are requiring it for their benefit. A 'pervasive' litter problem caused by the overwhelming volume of self-represented parties is best addressed by Canon 2. "A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially, competently, and diligently." "Luck' is an absence of objectivity and open-mindedness, and a clear bias and prejudice which undermines and fails to ensure pro se litigants the opportunity to have matters heard fairly and impartially. In the Questionnaire, Judge Wall indicated her "care and compassion will ensure that I treat all litigants equally" - a clear contradiction to the 'luck' of having EVEN ONE lawyer in the courtrooms.

I also learned that there was a plethora of repetitious filings; the Pro Se parties would often file several petitions at one time containing the same averments but different titles, or they would file petitions for modification within weeks or months of agreed orders or comprehensive orders entered after
protracted hearings. The cases were burdened with economic issues, drug and alcohol abuse, and/or mental health problems. With no attorneys available for guidance or counsel, the judges were forced to wear several hats: judge, attorney, therapist and parent. We were seeing people at their lowest point with
no legal assistance and no place to turn but to the Court system. The end result was a family court system burdened with climbing inventories, escalating emergency petitions, long delays in scheduling, and a drain on the Court and Court Administration’s time and resources.

A PLETHORA OF REPETITIOUS FILINGS. AT THE SAME TIME. SAYING THE SAME THING. This is a FALSEHOOD. The unrepresented don't have the time for that. NOBODY HAS TIME FOR THAT. The cases burdened with other issues, abuses and problems... LIKE ALL CASES. This is Family Court where the litigants are adults seeking an informed resolution to the issue before the court. The tremendous disdain for unrepresented litigants is again indicated where absent an "attorney for guidance or counsel" the judge is forced to be judge, attorney, therapist and parent. The statement lacks any logical connection to any reality. Perhaps Judge Wall has had a stroke.

In 2013, President Judge William J. Furber, Jr. asked me to step in as Administrative Judge of Family Court. I was both flattered that he believed I was capable of taking on that role with only three years under my belt in the third largest County in Pennsylvania, but I was also scared - very scared! It was a big undertaking and I never do things half way. I agreed to take on the challenge but only after Judge Furber assured me he would support my changes and commit to recognizing the importance of the Family Bench. I accepted the challenge and then the fun started!

Only a fool would promise to support changes prior to analysis and review. Another self-serving paragraph where the vocabulary contradicts the statements. Capable? Scared - Seriously? BIG UNDERTAKING? Challenge? Support? Commit? These sentences are constructed without logic or purpose.

I met with a diverse group of family attorneys and together we came up with an assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the Family Court, from the Bar’s perspective. Michael R. Kehs and
Cheryl Leslie from Court Administration were extremely supportive and helpful in adding to the Court’s perspective. As result of those meetings, a big picture plan emerged to make our Family Court
more responsive to the needs of the litigants. Now, I just needed to figure out how to get there!

Who has Judge Wall Completely Ignored? No participation by the unrepresented Pro Se litigants. The handwriting is on the wall. The big plan to address the needs of the litigants.

Some of the changes were easy: We initiated fees for petitions to modify, provided more stringent requirements for in forma pauperis status, and encourage our judges to enter more interim orders.

How do these changes address the NEEDS of the litigants? THEY DON'T!! Fees for Petitions - Additional costs for the litigants. - No added value to litigant. - No added benefit for litigant. Stringent In Forma Pauperis Requirements - More effort required by the litigants - More stringent requirements PLACED UPON THE DESTITUTE without any benefit for the litigant [In Healy v Healy...] [Judge Wall has failed to address an IFP petition filed on December 7, 2010] [Judge Wall has failed to address an IFP petition filed on December 14, 2010] [Judge Carluccio has failed to address an IFP petition filed on August 15, 2011] [Judge Carluccio has failed to address an IFP petition filed on September 19, 2011] [My contribution to THE PLETHORA of repetitious filings.] [Judge Page revoked an IFP without explanation to prevent an Appeal to Superior Court] [To have that revocation appealed, it would be necessary to FIRST obtain an IFP. Seriously.] Interim Orders - More interim orders. - No justification or explanation for this. - I suggest caution where ex parte orders are concealed and prevented from any proceeding.

Thanks to Judge Del Ricci, my colleagues on the Civil Bench cheerfully adopted some family cases in 2013 and were immensely helpful in putting a dent in our huge inventories. Those small changes were very positive and have laid the framework for the bigger change that are in motion at this time.

It's peculiar because Judge DelRicci and Judge Carluccio already took credit for clearing much of the court backlog in an event recorded on ITUNES and published in several periodicals and papers.

With the assistance of Sarinia M. Feinman, Chair of the Family Law Section, and various volunteers from
the Section’s sub-committees, we have made great strides. I wanted to take this opportunity to share the new rules that have been passed or are forthcoming and introduce the new programs that will
streamline Family Court procedures and bring aid to the Pro Se litigants.

LAWYERS MAKING WORK FOR LAWYERS. The only profession which can spontaneously create an economy for their workers. Injustice generates more revenue than justice.

Finally, I want to recognize the people who are willingly lending their assistance and expertise to changing the face of the Family Court.

"bring aid to the Pro Se litigants" WHAT? WHERE? WHEN? HOW? A Bar Association lawyer, with input from other lawyers under her direction.... WHAT GREAT STRIDES? There is no logic to any statements. There is no logic to any action. There is only an imaginary benefit to the litigant. What has been accomplished? assisted? changed? for all the gratitude? The only benefit is EXTRA fees. The suggestion that using a lawyer to obtain an interim order from a judge can circumvent the current procedure and law. HOW IS UNDERMINING THE CASE OF A PRO SE LITIGANT BENEFICIAL? Where is that benefit for the Pro Se Litigant? It was the alleged motivation and purpose of the proposed changes.

---

---

EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION & DIVORCE
Moving Equitable Distribution online
- Much to my surprise, I discovered that the equitable distribution (ED) scheduling system was not automated and the filing system was comprised of 5 x 7 cards! There was no way to track cases once a Grounds Order was issued moving the matters to equitable distribution, and there were open cases from the late 1990s! An intern painstakingly created a spreadsheet identifying cases where Grounds Orders were filed before 2012, which were then Continued on next pagedesignated for the ED Special Master program as described below. Cheryl Leslie is in the process of working with our IT department to incorporate the scheduling of ED cases into the existing family scheduling system. The new ED system will allow the Equitable Distribution Masters’ office to issue scheduling orders and Court Administration will be able to track the cases and keep them moving on a timelier basis from the date of the Grounds Order through the entry of the final Divorce Decree.

Equitable Distribution Special Master’s Program
- Once we identified the 220 plus oldest cases with no current activity, we designated them for the ED Special Master’s program. We enlisted the aid of the Honorable Arthur R. Tilson, who agreed to sit as a special master in equitable distribution to hear these cases and enter recommendations.

Within a few months, through the combined efforts of Cheryl Leslie, Judge Tilson and Margaret Carter, 1 administrative assistant to the senior judges, we were able to reduce the inventory of the oldest cases by nearly 200! The program will continue indefinitely as we try to bring the inventory up to date to prepare for the automation of the equitable distribution scheduling system, the new local equitable distribution rule, and the new Court procedures to effectuate the new rule.

Equitable Distribution Rule Change
- After working with the Family Law Section Chairs, Christian V. Badali in 2013 and Sarinia M. Feinman in 2014 for over a year, as well as the ED Sub-Committee of the Family Law Section, President Judge Furber and I signed NEW Local Rule 1920.73(c), which was certified by the Prothonotary, Mark Levy, on May 20, 2014. This Rule was to become effective 30 days after it was published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin
on June 7, 2014. Thus, the new Rule became effective as of Monday, July 7, 2014, but the new ED Fee ($400.00) that accompanies the Rule will not become effective until Monday, August 4, 2014, as the Prothonotary needed more time to get all of the computer programming and forms in place.

The new Local Rule includes a slightly modified Form for the Praecipe to Transmit the Record, and completely new Form for a Motion for Entry of Grounds Order and Appointment of Equitable Distribution Master. In an effort to avoid the extreme backup in the ED process, in order to obtain a Grounds Order and proceed to an ED Master, beginning on August 4th, you will have to pay the $400.00 fee to get to the Master. Further, as part of the new Rule, you will not be able to get scheduled before an ED Master until you certify that your discovery is completed and you are ready to have a meaningful conference and/or hearing with the Master to work towards settlement of the case. The hope is that this will force parties to come prepared to the first conference before the Master with an informed knowledge of the assets and liabilities that comprise the marital estate, so that the parties can discuss settlement or be able to schedule a timely hearing. Moreover,the new Rule should reduce the number of Pro Se filers who are simply seeking to divide up personal property where there are no other marital assets. In summary, the new Rule will ensure that only those cases that really need the Masters’ attention will have to be scheduled, thereby resulting in less delay and a reduced inventory for the ED Masters.

Date of Separation Issues
- Another change that has been enacted is the elimination of Special Masters being assigned to deal with date of separation issues that arise in divorce cases. It came to the Court’s attention, via the Chair of the Family Law Section, Sarinia M. Feinman, that there was no clear path of what was to occur procedurally once a full hearing was held before a Special Master regarding date of separation and Exceptions were filed to the Special Master’s Recommendation. There were no clear rules outlining whether this would be a De Novo Hearing or Oral Argument before the assigned Judge.

I discovered that Pro Se parties and/or cases with counsel were having full “on the record” hearings before the Special Master only to be potentially obliged to have another full hearing before the assigned Judge. This not only seemed like a waste of time and money for the clients, but also for the Special
Masters and Judges. Therefore, since there are no state or local rules designating special masters for date of separation issues, moving forward, if a date of separation issue arises, the assigned Judge will hear that issue from the outset, and Special Masters will no longer be utilized for this purpose, so as to promote efficiency for everyone and limit the delay.

If you would like to hear more about the new ED process that went into effect as of July 7th, please attend the Family Law Section Meeting and luncheon on Wednesday, August 6, 2014 at noon for a Town Hall Meeting, where there will also be an opportunity for feedback and questions from practitioners.

Special thanks to Cheryl Leslie, Erin Carter, our Equitable Distribution Masters, Gordon M. Mair and Bruce L. Goldenberg, and the Family Law Section’s Equitable Distribution Sub-Committee for their hard work, assistance and cooperation in updating our Equitable Distribution System.

MOTIONS COURT
- Overwhelmingly, the biggest request I received from the family lawyers was to create a Family Court
Motions Court. One of the greatest challenges we face is crafting procedures for a dedicated Motions
Court while maintaining the integrity of our “One Judge - One Family” policy which ensures that one
judge is assigned to a family throughout the case. The advantage to our “One Judge - One Family” system
is that we have a unique perspective of our individual families and can enter comprehensive orders rather
than having litigants appear before a different judge every time they enter the Courthouse.

Presently, family judges conduct short list conferences which are scheduled four to six weeks after a petition is filed. Parties can file emergency petitions seeking a quicker disposition of matters; however, judges are often inundated with petitions that do not rise to the level of an emergency and they have to weed out the real emergencies from the cases that can wait for a short list date.

A dedicated Motions Court would allow judges to hear certain matters on their cases much more quickly and efficiently. The benefits to a motions court system are threefold; parties can resolve problems quickly as a matter could be scheduled within days, orders will be issued that same day from the bench, and judges will reduce their short list matters which will allow more timely listings for protracted cases.

Although the details of the Motions Court are still being worked out with a local rule anticipated to go into effect in early 2015, you can expect that the matters handled in Motions Court will be those that are appropriate for decisions to be made from the bench and those matters that take no more than 10 minutes to argue on both sides. As of now, my Motions Court dates for the remainder of this year will be as follows: July 30; August 27; September 10 & 24; October 15 & 20; November 12 & 26; and December 10 & 22. Commencing in January of 2015, my Motions Court will generally be scheduled on the second and
fourth Wednesdays of the month. The Honorable Gail A. Weilheimer will also be participating in the Motions Court, and she will be providing her Motions Court dates in the near future. Some of the other Family Court Judges have expressed an interest in the new Motions Court rule, so that they may also participate in this program for their cases.

Special thanks to Cheryl Leslie, Joel B. Bernbaum, chair of the Family Law Section Motions Court sub-committee, as well as the other members of the sub-committee for their hard work, assistance and cooperation in assisting to get the Family Motions Court underway.

FRIEND OF THE COURT
- Presiding over Protection from Abuse (“PFA”) cases is one of the more challenging opportunities the family judge faces. There are well over forty cases per week and the litigants are angry, scared or emotionally drained. We are extremely fortunate to have the presence of Carol Horvitz and the volunteers from the Women’s Center who lend assistance and guidance to the Court. However, it quickly became apparent to me that a majority of the cases involved deteriorating familial relationships rather than
domestic abuse. The volunteers are wonderful at working with the parties to encourage settlements; however they are limited to what kind of advice they can give as they are not attorneys. I have observed numerous lost opportunities to direct Pro Se litigants toward the Lawyer Referral Service for consultations or to Domestic Relations or Court Administration to file family petitions.

I originally teamed up with Joo Park and Harry Byrne, co-chairs of the Pro Bono Committee, to discuss putting together a group of volunteers to represent Pro Se litigants in PFA Court. Our project got a big boost when Sharron L. Rex, a former Custody Conciliator in Montgomery County, offered to help launch a PFA volunteer program. The MBA has also expressed an interest in teaming up with the Temple University
Beasley School of Law to enact a third-year student volunteer program for PFA Court.

Additionally, we are in the process of observing similar programs in both Allegheny and Bucks Counties and have received insightful input from Legal Aid representatives and the Women’s Center. With the help of a talented group of people, we are currently in the process of developing a “Friend of the Court” program, whereby both plaintiffs and defendants may receive free representation in our weekly PFA Court by licensed attorneys or students working under the guidance of a licensed attorney. The goal is to provide training to the volunteers in exchange for CLE credits who will, in turn, donate their time
and efforts to representing both plaintiffs and defendants and lend guidance to steer Pro Se litigants away from PFA Court and toward the services they need to resolve their domestic disputes. Although there are many factors yet to be determined such as funding, office space, and administration, we are very
excited about this program and hope to see a working model in the late fall.

SUPPORT
- Gary Kline, Director of the Montgomery County Domestic Relations Office (“DRO”), has been recognized by the Commonwealth on an annual basis for the record amount of past due support collected by his office. To ensure thatthe trend continues, we have been collaborating on ways to decrease the number of contempt hearings that the judges have to hear on a weekly basis and put pressure on the defendants to force them to pay up. Every Friday morning, the DRO officers wheel over large boxes filled to the brim with the files representing the obligors who failed to pay their monthly support orders. Defendants often have multiple cases with large arrears and many are repeat offenders.

In a project aimed at reducing delinquent child support among the most egregious payers, DRO has selected specific cases and assigned them to Judge Barrett and me. The goal for the officer in DRO is to have the case removed from the general Friday contempt list by obtaining an initial payment on the support obligation. The defendants are contacted after being scheduled and told this is their last chance to comply before seeing a judge. If a payment is obtained, the case is removed from the list and scheduled for the next court list before the assigned judge. The case is then monitored for the next several months’ payments and the cycle continues until such time as the payments are received for four to six months consecutively, or the defendant obtains employment and a wage attachment is issued. If a hearing is necessary, the assigned judge has the option of finding the defendant in contempt and ordering incarceration or placing them in the monthly monitoring program. The key for the program to be a success is the rapid access directly to the court in front of the assigned judge, who is familiar with the party and the history of nonpayment.

Another benefit is that the program will reduce the Friday lists and eliminate multiple judges making decisions on the same group of delinquent obligors. Although the program is still in its infancy, to date, more than 70% of the cases identified have made regular payments.

In addition to the new support monitoring program, our new Sheriff, Russell Bono, has committed the resources of his office to the ongoing collection of outstanding child support.

The Sheriff has turned up the pressure on support delinquents by conducting routine roundups which are covered by the media and have resulted in the collection of thousands of dollars in a short period. Moreover, Gary Kline was happy to report that Montgomery County has the lowest number of DRO bench warrants it has ever recorded, and has over 100 less than the closest similarly sized county in the region.

Gary Kline reported 267 outstanding warrants at this time (which includes defendants who reside outside of the state) as compared to 800 a few years ago. Way to go Gary Kline and Sheriff Bono!

SUMMARY
-There are still so many things to do! We will continue to assess programs and staff duties to improve Family Court Services. We will continue to identify any problems as they arise and strive to find solutions for those problems, so as to promote efficiency and expediency in the Court system.

Many thanks to Court Administrator Michael R. Kehs and President Judge William J. Furber, Jr. who kept his promise and supported the new changes, and a special thanks to Sarinia M. Feinman, of the law firm of Vetrano & Vetrano, for her incredible contributions, support, and hard work.

Finally, I want to acknowledge the Honorable Rhonda Lee Daniele for her many years of service as Administrative Judge of Family Court. I have gained new found respect for her and wish to thank her for all of her hard work.

---

This article is pure disinformation and misdirection.