INJUSTICE -- Not Police. Not Public. It's the lawyers.

Do people really NOT see that it is the lawyers in the media who are the ones baiting the police and the public?

Every injustice, every corruption, every report, every failure to apply the Law, every podium.... a lawyer is standing right there.

THE ONLY PERSON GETTING PAID TO BE SPECIFICALLY THERE FOR THAT ANNOUNCEMENT OR SPEECH IS THE LAWYER.

It's not the blacks. It's the lawyers.
It's not the gays. It's the lawyers.
It's not the police. It's the lawyers.
It's not the judges. It's the lawyers.
It's not the columnists. It's the lawyers.
It's not the pundits. It's the lawyers.
It's not the immigrants. It's the lawyers.
It's not the fiances. It's the lawyers
It's not the politicians. It's the lawyers.
It's not the ministers. It's the lawyers.
It's not the victims. MY GOD. THEY KILLED THEM. THIS MUST STOP.

I do not hate lawyers.
I do hate a law which mandates the corruption of the entire profession which their 'non-profit social organization - which looks more like a union/mafia' had enacted into LAW in every state where the federal government is prevented from intervention because THEY HAVE TO FOLLOW THE STATE LAW... even while people are being denied basic constitutional protections.

DON'T HATE THE LAWYER. HATE THEIR UNETHICAL LAW.

Rule 1.6 is concealing the injustice of judges and lawyers

Swiss Cheese, Donuts, and Elephants. OH MY!

How does any recap of Kathleen Kane's 2014 not mention the two secret court orders from unidentified judges in unidentified courts which prevent her from investigations and prosecutions AND PREVENT HER FROM DISCUSSING IT?

The American News Media fails to explain the holes in their reporting. [Insert Swiss cheese or Donut metaphor here]

While surviving the constant litigation of Healy v Healy and Healy v Miller, it became obvious that the issue being ignored and neglected was distracting from that HUGE elephant in the room.

It became UNDENIABLE.... it was the non-disclosure pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information which was undermining the law, undermining justice, undermining the Constitution... AND LEGAL PROFESSIONALS WERE NOT PERMITTED TO POINT IT OUT... and prevented from any actions which addressed it.

How do you point out the corruption caused by a law, when the very law itself prevents it from being exposed?

How did this unconstitutional, unethical and immoral LAW find it's way into the ethics standards for lawyers in EVERY state?

An unethical ethics standard mandates fraud in the furtherance of fraud without any allowance for rectifying it. A complete disregard for the rights of the victim, who becomes further victimized without any opportunity for relief. (What if they never stop the 'furtherances'?)

Surely, 50 state legislatures and governors would have noticed. BUT, The American Bar Association provided their 'Ethics' Rules to each state supreme court to enact into LAW.

No construction by a legislature.
No constitutional review.
No signature of a governor.
No ability for the court to reverse - it would expose their corruption... adverse judicial affects violate Rule 1.6

EVERY LAWYER, JUDGE AND LEGAL PROFESSIONAL MANDATED TO IGNORE... and they all did.

With only themselves to regulate and discipline the profession, the extreme failure of their deliberate lapse in ethics was concealed, non-disclosed and kept confidential for decades. Many simply accepted and never questioned the injustice and corruption - even when wrapped in constitutional violations and fraud. They knew it was wrong. They did nothing.
Note to Lawyers: THAT'S NOT SELF-POLICING. It's called conspiracy when you cover up the crimes of others. Awards from the bar associations for your 'efforts' quickly begin to resemble kickbacks when compiled on a resume.

INJUSTICE, JUDICIAL CORRUPTION, FRAUD UPON THE COURT, Manipulation of the media to divide people, prevent information and prevent exposure of the needle in the haystack of US Injustice. Look at EVERY story of injustice in the US and you can see the effect of Rule 1.6 - there's a lawyer who is concealing the truthful information while presenting disinformation and misinformation... because Rule 1.6 allows and endorses their fraud in the furtherance of injustice.

The fix is simple. Prepare for a shameful mea culpa from the state and federal judiciary for their egregious violations and rape of the public trust. Once Rule 1.6 is removed. Everything else works still. Rule 1.6 was the problem which undermined every reform or attempt to 'correct' the problems with the judiciary and the courts.

American judges are not known for deftness and speed when addressing their irresponsible actions. Shamelessly, they have known for years that the Rule 1.6 problem was very exposed. They tried to hide it. They persist in using further injustice to conceal their injustice... because Rule 1.6 allows and endorses their fraud in the furtherance of fraud.

The only possible issue which Kathleen Kane could be addressing in that CNN interview... Every statement clearly points to Rule 1.6 issues. Once you know what it is, and how big the problem,

Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane received court orders from unidentified courts and unidentified judges for unidentified reasons. About the Orders, she said the following:
– “We are not investigating. I cannot investigate.”
– “I am being stopped from performing my duties as Attorney General.”
– “My office is being stopped from certain investigations.”
– “And we are being stopped even from telling why.”
– “My hands are tied and this will be frustrating for you because it is just as frustrating for me.”
– “My hands are tied because there are court orders which don’t allow us to say certain things which I believe the public needs to know.”
– “I knew that I was walking into public corruption. Which again is why I ran.”
– “But I will tell you this. Even I am shocked at the level of public corruption.”
– “I am shocked at how deep it goes.
I am shocked at how powerful it is.
I have never seen anything like this. It’s breathtaking.
It has been described by the people familiar with what is happening as shameful.”
– “But, if this can be done to me as Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer of the 5th largest state in the country, i am sickened to think what can and may be done to regular, good people who don’t have the resources that I have to challenge it.”

When you consider that Governor Tom Corbett has been Attorney General or Governor for the last decade, and most everyone who accuses Kathleen Kane of 'silence' has something to be exposed once the veil is lifted...

Occam's Razor applies and explains... It's Rule 1.6

Except Daryl Metcalfe - who seems to be EXTREMELY CONCERNED that some man is gonna pop the question.

Would someone please prepare a Petition for the signature of every gay man in the Commonwealth where they promise NOT TO MARRY DARYL METCALFE.

Maybe then Daryl can relax his sphincter. ( [Takei voice] OH MY, that could be problematic too, I suppose.)

My Grown-up Christmas List

My kids remember me.
They sat upon my knee.
I am their Dad.
They can't take that from me

They have grown up now.
But Alienated ...and HOW?
Divorce, Custody
Family Court Brutality

Here's my life long wish
Most Sincere Christmas List
For parents and children
and broken family

No more lives torn apart
That wars would never start
And time would heal all hearts
And everyone would have a friend
And right would always win
And love would never end

This is my grown up Christmas list.

JUSTICE IS COMING.

"There is love in this room. Can you feel it?
Love is in this room. Can you feel it?
Love for a father. Love for a mother.
Love for a brother too.
Absolutely. Not Maybe.
There will always be love in this room."

This was what Christmas at Home looked like before the corrupt careless judge threw our family through the shredder and our memories went in the trash. Why do good people trust the judicial system? Because they have no idea of the injustice and corruption which feeds on divorce and custody.

... and they have no idea how a LAW in every state causes every corrupt lawless and criminal act to be concealed, non-disclosed and confidential.

Central Legal Services - Their Motivation for Fraud

When Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio issued the defective divorce decree, she did NOT have subject matter jurisdiction. She had deliberately neglected her lack of jurisdiction to create what she called her "Unappealable Order". An order which causes a loss of absolute judicial immunity once the defect is acknowledged and the order stricken ab initio.

A defective and void order which no judge will address because to do so would expose judicial corruption and injustice not just by Carluccio, but by every judge who has been involved in the matter. The judges clearly see what Carluccio has done to their honor and integrity. They must sacrifice their integrity to conceal the lack of integrity of the prior judges. They delay and prevent justice and ignore and terrorize the victim/survivor further.

Requiring more effort, more cost, and lost time. I have no choice, if not corrected, if not addressed, there is no escape, I will be 1) Homeless/Destitute 2) Incarcerated or 3) another Family Court Suicide.

The corruption has caused every immunity to be unavailable. Absolute, Judicial, Legislative, Prosecutorial, Witness, Qualified.

Judges have immunity against errors, even the most malicious and deliberate actions.

The Supreme Court held in Stump v Sparkmanm that judges have absolute immunity from Section 1983 damage actions for their "judicial" acts. Stump v Sparkman, 435 US 349 (1978)

Absolute judicial immunity is justified in part because "the judicial process is largely self-correcting: procedural rules, appeals and the possibility of collateral challenges obviate the need for damages actions to prevent unjust results." Mithchell v Forsthy, 472 US 511, 522 (1985)

THE EXCEPTION: Absolute immunity is restricted to those persons performing judicial or legislative functions.

The Supreme Court held in Stump v. Sparkman that judges have absolute immunity from Section 1983 damage actions for their “judicial” acts. The Court permitted liability only for acts taken “in the clear absence of all jurisdiction.”

Because of its focus on judicial acts, judicial immunity attaches to the judicial function, not the judicial office.

All circuits interpret Stump and Bradley to require a clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction in order to lose immunity.

Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio has deliberately issued a defective order.

Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio has deliberately issued an order which is void ab initio.

Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio was promptly notified of the defect in her void order.

Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio ignored the notification of the defect and retaliated with ANOTHER malicious order.

Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio ignored further notifications of the defect and the affect when subsequent orders are based on defective and void orders.

Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio again retaliated with continuances, threw due process and notice to the wind, and continued to issue retaliatory orders while causing irreparable harm to property and possessions.

Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio ignored the law which caused her void order to be defective. This was not a slight procedural error. Ignoring the LAW causes a clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction.

Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio defied, prevented and ignored all corrective measures available to her when the court was petitioned to address the defect.

Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio prevented, delayed and obstructed an Appeal to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania filed timely once reconsideration was refused. Though with a defective and void order even the date it was issued is a nullity.

While awaiting the Appeal filed August 15, 2011 to proceed, there was not much which could be done. A Motion to the Supreme Court is not permitted while the Appeal matter is pending.

Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio prevented the corrective measures to address her unjust defective and void order - There were outstanding petitions which her series of orders arbitrarily denied and prevented without hearings. There were cancellations of several proceedings BY EMAIL/Praecipe without notice to the parties. There were rescheduling orders issued, which were then cancelled.

YES, I KNEW CAROLYN TORNETTA CARLUCCIO WAS BEING EVIL, MALICIOUS, RETALIATORY, and UNJUST. I tried to keep her informed, however she retaliated with extreme vengeance.

Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio dismissed petitions requesting her recusal from the matter without discussion.

Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio deliberately issued defective and void orders while there was a failure to follow Pennsylvania Law and prevented correctionj or resolution. There is a clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction.

While maliciously retaliating by compounding her lack of jurisdiction, the effort to deny, ignore and prevent any corrective measure even when properly petitioned to the court and served on all parties demonstrates a deliberate and intentional indifference towards the clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction. - an abuse of power under color of law with intent to cause damage to property and severe emotional harm.

Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio was attempting to orchestrate a suicide. The only escape from being held responsible and accountable for her crimes.

The non-suicide alternative would affect the integrity of the other members of the judiciary.

Judge Haaz stopped the short list conference and did not schedule any proceeding while the appeal was pending.

Judge Page COMPLETELY IGNORED THE DEFECTIVE AND VOID ORDER. Holding hearings while jurisdiction was in the Superior Court during the pending first appeal, Judge Page faced the choice of
1) addressing the defect and exposing the corrupt and criminal actions of Carolyn Carluccio
OR
2) ordering an absurd payment of over $300,000 for contempt - EVEN THOUGH THERE WAS NO CONTEMPT.

An Order had been issued verbally and partially written by Carluccio during a convoluted hearing where everything which was scheduled was ignored and a new petition JUST filed was the focus of the proceeding.

As every attempt to hold me in contempt was a false allegation, it was clear that the purpose of the last minute petition was to create an obligation which could be used to accuse of contempt. Another setup where all of the prior efforts had been recognized and avoided. The last minute petition was withdrawn after the proceeding - would never be scheduled. Another void order based on a void order based on a defective and void ab initio order.

The goal of the setup was to have me incarcerated for contempt.

BUT, where I appealed and the matter proceeded went to the Superior Court of Philadelphia, another judiciary was about to be impacted just as the 20 members of the Montgomery County Bench had been forced to sacrifice their integrity for the lack of integrity of the judges who preceeded them.

THE SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIARY WOULD BE AWARE OF THE VERY CLEAR ABSENCE OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AND THE POTENTIAL FOR LIABILITY AND DAMAGES.

Three Appeals were in the Superior Court concurrently.
Healy v Healy - The Divorce
Healy v Healy - the Contempt and
Healy v Miller - the Fraudulent Conveyance of the House.

As there was a constitutional issue to be addressed, the Pennsylvania Attorney General was notified of the appeals pursuant to the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane received a court order from an unidentified court and unidentified judge for unidentified reasons. About the Orders, she said the following:
- “We are not investigating. I cannot investigate.”
- “I am being stopped from performing my duties as Attorney General.”
- “My office is being stopped from certain investigations.”
- “And we are being stopped even from telling why.”
- “My hands are tied and this will be frustrating for you because it is just as frustrating for me.”
- “My hands are tied because there are court orders which don’t allow us to say certain things which I believe the public needs to know.”
- “I knew that I was walking into public corruption. Which again is why I ran.”
- “But I will tell you this. Even I am shocked at the level of public corruption.”
- "I am shocked at how deep it goes.
I am shocked at how powerful it is.
I have never seen anything like this. It’s breathtaking.
It has been described by the people familiar with what is happening as shameful.”
- “But, if this can be done to me as Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer of the 5th largest state in the country, i am sickened to think what can and may be done to regular, good people who don't have the resources that I have to challenge it.”

The Pennsylvania Attorney General was absent from involvement in the Appeals though required by law to address the constitutional issue.

To avoid any accountability and responsibility, the appeals were intercepted and never provided to the judiciary. All paperwork was handled by the Central Legal Staff. No orders were signed by any judges. No 'decision' of any motion was supported in law. Where an argument was scheduled before a panel, I was not notified. Memoranda and Opinions clearly neglected the essential issue - the challenge to jurisdiction. Errors in the Docket were not corrected. Documents purported to be written by judges violated each of the judicial canons.

Opposing counsel's briefs had neglected to address the challenge to jurisdiction. As there was no supporting information or evidence of jurisdiction provided during the lower court hearings, they really had nothing upon which to address or counter the essential issue.

Where the Central Legal Staff is not permitted by Pennsylvania Law to intercept and respond as judges, A Complaint was prepared and filed with the Superior Court, the US Attorney, the Philadelphia District Attorney, the Bucks County District Attorney, the Pennsylvania Attorney General and the US Postal Inspection Service to address the fraudulent actions, the constitutional violations and the interference with the administration of the Courts.

The Superior Court had been notified about the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information as it pertained to the lower court activity.

It was not anticipated that the Superior Court would demonstrate the unconstitutional affect of Rule 1.6. Where the Central Legal Staff could claim Confidentiality pursuant to the Rules of Professional Conduct - Rule 1.6 Confidentiality, their fraud and constitutional violations demonstrated the unconstitutional Rule 1.6 affect upon the litigant prevented access to the court.

Additionally, as the intrusive technology, wiretaps and surveillance utilized by the County in efforts to create a criminal case against me would have required the action and approval of judges of the Superior Court, they may have held a bias, or felt an overwhelming necessity to keep confidential the volume of harassing and intrusive actions of the County Detectives and Task Force members which had failed.

Where the Superior Court may have wanted to recuse from the matter because of that bias, they were prevented where a recusal without explanation would lead to the discovery.

The Superior Court Judiciary presented a farce. A foolish game to waste time. A continued Denial of Constitutional Rights, the Rule of Law and any Protection under the Law.

A document had been docketed by the Superior Court to which the Court responded without distributing copies to the parties. Upon Motion to Produce the Document, the entry disappeared. It is logical and reasonable to surmise the 'secret' Document is one of the Orders issued to Attorney General Kathleen Kane preventing investigation, exposure, discussion and involvement by an unidentified judge in an unidentified court.

The timing of this secret order corresponds with the date when a special counsel was assigned to investigate emails between the Pennsylvanioa Supreme Court and the Office of the Attorney General. The report indicate a volume of hundreds of emails being exchanged between a Supreme Court Justice and the office of the Attorney General while that Justice was a judge at the Superior Court, and that the emails related to the use of wiretaps and surveillance.

http://www.pacourts.us/assets/files/resource-58807/file-4191.pdf

A second 'secret' order commanding silence regarding any investigation into the corruption of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas and the 20 judges which have been assigned to the matter of Healy v Healy. When viewed in concert with the Grand Jury under the Supervision of Thomas Carluccio, one can only assume that the husband of Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio would be excused from being compelled to testify regarding the investigation and the information exchanged with the grand jury. The second secret court being issued by the Montgomery County Court of common Pleas to use the grand jury process to conceal information and evidence.

Additionally, the Central Legal Staff farce exposed the same fraudulent actions had occurred in the Eastern District Court and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals which improperly dismissed the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 where Rule 1.6 permits Legal professional to commit fraud to conceal prior fraud; and while preventing actions to rectify fraud.

I understand the effort being put forth to conceal the corruption caused by Rule 1.6 for the last 30 years. There comes a point in time where the problem must be recognized and the corruption and injustice must end.

I will not accept the further fraudulent manipulations and denial of my Constitutional Rights and equal protection of the Law.

I recognize that the initial Rule 1.6 injustice which triggered my loss of rights and protection of the law occurred in August 2007 - making every petition, proceeding and unjust ruling in the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas an epic farce intended to harass, terrorize and annihilate my life and my family. The deliberate act of Rhonda Lee Daniele issuing a secret Court Order which slandered me, was kept concealed from me, and prevented from exposure by the judiciary.

They involved my children in their effort and that alienation caused by their participation is shameful and humiliating. My children have yet to get to the point where they can contact or speak to me. They were used as tools against their parent to cause emotional stress and damage.

It is time to end the injustice and the conspiracy which conceals it. I understand and recognize the massive scope of the national issue. The Department of Justice, the US Congress and every state Attorney General and Governor has been aware of the issue since August 2013. The efforts to restore justice and the US Constitution is moving too slowly and costing people their lives. The organization responsible continues divisive efforts which undermine law enforcement and manipulate the news media.

Had I not been terrorized by an entire judicial bench by injustice and corruption, it would not have been necessary for me to determine why everyone thought it was acceptable and legal to ignore the crimes committed against me.

Rule 1.6 is the needle in the haystack of injustice where the American Bar Association Model Rules of Professional Conduct are neither ethical, nor moral nor legal, nor constitutional... and as such, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court was without proper authority to enact Rule 1.6 into Law. The same issue exists and affects EVERY state.

The American Bar Association - an organization whose members profit from injustice - with local organizations and affiliates existing at every level of state and federal government and judiciary.

The People of the United States have noticed the Injustice, Rule 1.6 unconstitutional corruption and injustice must be addressed.

JUSTICE IS COMING.
Every. Person. Matters.

Rule 1.6 is concealing the injustice of judges and lawyers

Rule 1.6 - Confidentiality of Information - The judges made it LAW. The judiciary lost independence and have been held hostage by the lawyers who profit from every action. There is an ABA affiliated organization at every level of the courts to ensure the judiciary held hostage does not break free. The lawyers blame the judges, yet lawyers control the paperwork, schedule, newsmedia... and the lawyers get PAID.

The corrupt lawyers control the grand juries, and every aspect of law enforcement. The sheriffs and others not under Rule 1.6 are convinced of diminished authority.

It's not about hating lawyers... It is about their profiting from INJUSTICE... and the terror they inflict in the process. If the legal professional is NOT getting paid, they are not interested.

Attack a cop - Lawyers get paid

Threaten a judge - Lawyers get paid

File in court - Lawyers get paid

Bad law - Lawyers get paid

Grand Jury Corruption - Lawyers get paid

Murder a cop - Lawyers on TV get paid

Crime - Lawyers get paid

Murder/Suicide - DENIED THEM PROFITS
- where the lawyers efforts pushed someone to the brink, they will slander every aspect of the person who denied them PROFIT$

Murder your family - THEY DON'T CARE
(Plenty more available)

Suicide - THEY DON'T CARE
(Family Court has more)

The American Bar Association created Rule 1.6 injustice and had it enacted into LAW in every state.

Unconstitutional law denying people's rights, freedoms, and preventing any relief or escape.

Where justice doesn't generate any revenue for the legal profession...

INJUSTICE IS A GOLD MINE!

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality permits every effort to expose it to be undermined by fraud - which is concealed. Even the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 was undermined by fraud in the federal district court in Philadelphia and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

When Rule 1.6 unconstitutionality was proven to Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane, she was prevented from action by secret orders from secret courts. The 'worst kept secret in Pennsylvania' is just a part of A Terroristic Divorce. Rule 1.6 INJUSTICE.

“But I will tell you this. Even I am shocked at the level of public corruption.”
I am shocked at how deep it goes.
I am shocked at how powerful it is.
I have never seen anything like this. It’s breathtaking.
It has been described by the people familiar with what is happening as shameful.”

“But, if this can be done to me as Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer of the 5th largest state in the country, i am sickened to think what can and may be done to regular, good people who don;t have the resources that I have to challenge it.”

- Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane on two court ordered mandates from unidentified judges and unidentified courts.

Team Corbett continues attacks on the 'silenced' AG Kane

Tom Corbett, Frank Fina, Seth Williams, Bob Brady, Dave Heckler, Stewart Greenleaf, Bruce Castor, Risa Ferman, Tom Carluccio...

Pointing LOUDLY to one investigation with political suggestions, yet neglecting to address an investigation with two secret court orders from two secret judges in two secret courts.

Why does Team Corbett keep pointing to the 'low hanging fruit'? A distraction from the unprecedented - TWO SECRET COURT ORDERS WHICH PREVENT ACTION, EXPOSURE, INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION. What is that all about???

District Attorneys Heckler & Williams have ignored the well-documented crimes and constitutional violations of the courthouse staff.

Questioning the discretion of the Attorney General in spite of the corruption being concealed by court orders. Those who are not discussing the secret court orders are logically the people responsible for requesting the corrupt judicial actions.

Team Corbett is clearly focused on keeping "everything Sandusky' out of the public domain - if they lose Rule 1.6 Confidentiality then the public will learn EVERYTHING. The Unconstitutional affect of Rule 1.6 is proven in those criminal reports of violation of PA law and the US constitution. If they cannot conceal injustice and corruption under Rule 1.6, they will likely be joining Jerry Sandusky and wearing orange Team Corbett jumpsuits.

Every corrupt action to ignore the unconstitutional law - called Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information - is ONLY protected until the unconstitutional is acknowledged. It is proven in those lapsed investigations in the Philadelphia and Bucks County District Attorney's Offices. The complaint filed in both counties and federally with US Attorney Zane Memeger. An additional investigation was requested by the U.S. Postal Inspectors as the Central Legal Staff of the court used the mail in their fraud and forgery.

Attorney General Kathleen Kane has been court ordered NOT TO INVESTIGATE.

Governor Elect Tom Wolf, Shut Down The Montgomery County Courthouse.

“But I will tell you this. Even I am shocked at the level of public corruption.”
I am shocked at how deep it goes.
I am shocked at how powerful it is.
I have never seen anything like this. It’s breathtaking.
It has been described by the people familiar with what is happening as shameful.”

“But, if this can be done to me as Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer of the 5th largest state in the country, i am sickened to think what can and may be done to regular, good people who don;t have the resources that I have to challenge it.”

- Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane on two court ordered mandates from unidentified judges and unidentified courts.

Governor Wolf, SHUT DOWN THIS COURTHOUSE.

The terror of their injustice is unrestricted and boundless and concealed by corrupt manipulation of the willing judiciary.

“But I will tell you this. Even I am shocked at the level of public corruption.”
I am shocked at how deep it goes.
I am shocked at how powerful it is.
I have never seen anything like this. It’s breathtaking.
It has been described by the people familiar with what is happening as shameful.”

“But, if this can be done to me as Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer of the 5th largest state in the country, i am sickened to think what can and may be done to regular, good people who don;t have the resources that I have to challenge it.”

- Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane on two court ordered mandates from unidentified judges and unidentified courts.

Governor Wolf, Shut down the Montgomery County Courthouse.

Assemble the Pennsylvania Legislature... Suspend Rule 1.6 and arrest and prosecute the monsters who terrorize this county and bring shame upon the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Thank the lawyers in the Legislature for their service and accept their resignations. Sen. Stewart Greenleaf and Rep. Todd Stephens should be at the front of the line... followed by the Judiciary Committees who ignored the issue... and then every lawyer in the Senate and Legislature. They have all participated in 'the worst kept secret in Pennsylvania'.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Chief Justice Ron Castille can expose the Judges and Judiciary who prevented the Pennsylvania Attorney General from performing the responsibilities of the Office of Attorney General by issuing 'secret' orders to promote corruption and perversions of justice in violation of law, the Pennsylvania Constitution and the Constitution of the United States of America.

When you stop payment of the pensions to the corrupt, and seize the property obtained using their ill-gotten gains, you'll find the money to pay for that shortfall in the budget.

Proclaim JUSTICE throughout All the Land
Unto All the Inhabitants thereof.

... Don't be distracted by the petty stories of naughty emails and the infighting from those bullies already evicted from the AG's office. Friends of the last AG who ignored the massive corruption for years...

Mr. ______, Shut down this courthouse.

Who will be the one to end the abomination of injustice and corruption perpetuated by the criminals on the Montgomery County Judiciary?

Gov. Tom Corbett - YOU FAILED. YOU IGNORED IT. YOU PARTICIPATED. YOU ENDORSED. No wonder you shuddered on the day Terance Healy introduced himself to you in Doylestown.

Attorney General Eric Holder - The United States Attorney General is the only lawyer in the country permitted to take action by law. Why are you taking so long? People are being killed because of the criminal actions of an entire judiciary.

Governor elect Tom Wolf - A non-lawyer who can lawfully take action to end a terrorist regime in the second largest county in Pennsylvania. Act now before they make it illegal for you to address the issue.

Governor Wolf... Shut Down this Courthouse!

Assemble the Pennsylvania Legislature... Suspend Rule 1.6 and arrest and prosecute the monsters who terrorize this county and bring shame upon the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Thank the lawyers in the Legislature for their service and accept their resignations. Sen. Stewart Greenleaf and Rep. Todd Stephens should be at the front of the line... followed by the Judiciary Committees who ignored the issue... and then every lawyer in the Senate and Legislature. They have all participated in 'the worst kept secret in Pennsylvania'.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Chief Justice Ron Castille can expose the Judges and Judiciary who prevented the Pennsylvania Attorney General from performing the responsibilities of the Office of Attorney General by issuing 'secret' orders to promote corruption and perversions of justice in violation of law, the Pennsylvania Constitution and the Constitution of the United States of America.

When you stop payment of the pensions to the corrupt, and seize the property obtained using their ill-gotten gains, you'll find the money to pay for that shortfall in the budget.

Proclaim JUSTICE throughout All the Land
Unto All the Inhabitants thereof.

... Don't be distracted by the petty stories of naughty emails and the infighting from those bullies already evicted from the AG's office. Friends of the last AG who ignored the massive corruption for years...

The Superior Court Farce - Unconstitutional. Unprosecuted. Injustice Ignored.

Imagine three appeals to the Superior Court. Each attempting to address the same single basic point.

A judge has acted without jurisdiction. It was deliberate - she wanted your suicide and you have repeatedly failed to deliver. Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio knew EXACTLY what she was doing. She ignored EVERY procedure. She ignored every law. I notified. She failed to correct. She retaliated.

Where subject matter jurisdiction is the single element required for absolute immunity, one of the twenty judges to hear the case, Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio exposed the entire Montgomery County Bench to liability. All circuits interpret Stump and Bradley to require a clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction in order to lose immunity. The neglect and failure to correct demonstrates deliberate informed actions with clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction.

Carluccio called it her "Unappealable Order" because any judge who addresses it would bring down an entire bench. As there can be no retroactive correction for lack of jurisdiction, the order is designed to destroy a litigant. There can NEVER be relief where this order which defies being addressed can be used to undermine any and every court. CIA torture tactics ended, Carluccio's judicial tactic was 'to the death'.

I AM NOT BRADLEY STONE. You will not provoke me to the point of self-destruction. AND GOD KNOWS THE JUDICIARY HAS TRIED SINCE 2007 TO MAKE THAT HAPPEN. (** See Footnote **)

I have faced their unending EVIL and CRUELTY and have defiantly not ended up dead in a ditch.

I have lost EVERYTHING and not been gunned down in a hail of bullets.

I have brought the issue of their lawlessness to EVERY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY and have been ignored without explanation.

Currently, the Superior Court Farce is documented with 5 different departments. They have the evidence which demonstrates that the Central Legal Staff intercepted and intervened - providing unsigned unsubstantiated orders which ignored any issue and dismissed every issue. The has been no review of any motion or brief by the judiciary of the Superior Court. No proceeding. Everything done on paper without signatures. Everything violated the Judicial Canons.

The Superior Court has been 'involved' for years... but done nothing. I am homeless, destitute, unemployed, under constant litigation requirements and deadlines... Because I have not crumbled, they have continued to delay to the point where three concurrent appeals were occurring with constant paperwork demands.

AND THEN IT WAS CLEAR... there is no judge behind these actions. They are fake. Forgery. Different paperwork. Different captions. Different letterhead. There is no applicable law. Everything which has occurred within the Superior Court has been a complete farce. Discourtesy and disrespect - all attempts to provoke an outburst. Raising all of their farce to their attention. Of course, they ignored their own farce.

Hiding behind the corrupt actions of the Central Legal Staff. BUT, their actions CLEARY violate Pennsylvania law. Their actions are unconstitutional - inter alia interfering with the administration of the courts. Where they might hide behind Rule 1.6 confidentiality, they prove the Rule is unconstitutional - a nullity - no law - and the PA Supreme Court has no authority to enaxct a law which affects substantive rights.

While I have been struggling alone to survive, EVERYTHING THE SUPERIOR COURT HAS DONE HAS BEEN FAKE. INCOMPREHENSIBLE. UNDENIABLE. CRIMINAL.

... and UNCONSTITUTIONAL

US Attorney Zane Memeger has had the information about the CENTRAL LEGAL STAFF crimes for over a month... (October 30, 2014)

Attorney General Kathleen Kane has had the information about the CENTRAL LEGAL STAFF crimes for over a month... (November 15, 2014)

Philadelphia District Attorney Seth Williams has had the information about the CENTRAL LEGAL STAFF crimes for over a month... (November 15, 2014)

Bucks District Attorney David Heckler has had the information about the CENTRAL LEGAL STAFF crimes for over a month... (November 15, 2014)

Montgomery District Attorney Risa Ferman - LOL! There is no point when she has cancelled EVERY investigation by Montgomery County Detectives for the last 9 years.

The US Postal Inspection Service has had the information about the CENTRAL LEGAL STAFF crimes for over a month... Mail Fraud. (Inspectors are non-lawyers, not corrupted by Rule 1.6, who have not been undermined like the County Sheriffs.)

I AM NOT BRADLEY STONE. I WILL NOT PERMIT DISTRICT ATTORNEY RISA FERMAN TO APPEAR ON TELEVISION AND IN EVERY NEWSPAPER SELF-RIGHTEOUSLY TALKING ABOUT A MAN WHO WAS PUSHED TO THE BRINK BY THE CORRUPTION OF THE COURTS AND THE FAILURES OF LAW ENFORCEMENT... and then blamed for breaking.

The list of Family Court Suicides is extensive and heartbreaking... and ignored by everyone. People fear what will happen to them if they care enough to get involved... and they should. These people know how to annihilate a person. They have had plenty of experience.

I am Terance Healy. This is the story of A Terroristic Divorce. This is the story of concealing injustice and the actions which eventually involved an entire county judiciary - where their actions to conceal an initial injustice became broader and more involved because their own actions had to then be concealed.

This is the story of A LIFE WITHOUT PROTECTION OF THE LAW... without Constitutional Rights... and an experience which lead to the realization of the needle in the haystack of injustice and those responsible. The sedition and corruption and perversion of justice brought to you by the American Bar Association - controlling judges and lawyers and undermining the judiciary and law enforcement at every level of the state and federally.

The American Bar Association has failed to comply or respond to the CEASE & DESIST letter sent to every national, state and affiliated organization - which included EVERY STATE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE.

We have presented the issue of the ABA's Rule 1.6 to thousands of legislators, law enforcement, lawyers and the judiciary. While INJUSTICE is in the national consciousness, they fail to act. They fear each other far more than an angry American population.

Proclaim JUSTICE throughout All the Land
Unto All the Inhabitants thereof.

America is waking up to the injustice. The family and friends of the largest prison population in the world is recognizing the ABA's response to the advance of civil rights in the 60's was the injustice and incarceration concealed by Rule 1.6 since the 80's.

Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane, how about addressing those two court orders from unidentified judges and unidentified courts... or introducing someone who can.

"We are not investigating. I cannot investigate."

"I am being stopped from performing my duties as Attorney General."

"My office is being stopped from certain investigations."

"And we are being stopped even from telling why."

"My hands are tied and this will be frustrating for you because it is just as frustrating for me."

"My hands are tied because there are court orders which don’t allow us to say certain things which I believe the public needs to know."

"I knew that I was walking into public corruption. Which again is why I ran."

"But I will tell you this. Even I am shocked at the level of public corruption."
I am shocked at how deep it goes.
I am shocked at how powerful it is.
I have never seen anything like this. It’s breathtaking.
It has been described by the people familiar with what is happening as shameful."

"But, if this can be done to me as Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer of the 5th largest state in the country, i am sickened to think what can and may be done to regular, good people who don;t have the resources that I have to challenge it."

I would tell my story to the media... but, their lawyers won't allow it.

** Carluccio's defective and void order was issued May 9, 2011, BUT it was not the first order which lacked jurisdiction, notice and correction. The Secret Order of Judge Rhonda Lee Daniele had been issued in August 2007, never distributed, never docketed, without any proceeding, concealed in a separate court file, used to undermine EVERY proceeding, and FOUND IN AUGUST 2010. The terror of the Montgomery County Court continued with the additional threat to courthouse staffers who revealed the corruption. Since 2007, the entire court case, every petition and proceeding, had been a complete farce to terrorize me. THEY JUST WON"T STOP.

Kathleen Kane's Court Ordered Secrecy

Three Appeals will now be sent to the PA Supreme Court - with all three demonstrating the corruption and failure of the lower court AND the interception by the Superior Court Legal Staff - their fraudulent documents interfered with the administration of justice... and denied access to the court.

All three appeals neglected the deliberately defective and void order of Judge Carolyn Carluccio which lacked jurisdiction... still lacks jurisdiction... can never have jurisdiction... with a defect which causes a lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

The defect - failure to follow the PA law - cause a clear loss of subject matter jurisdiction. All circuits interpret Stump and Bradley to require a clear absence of subject matter jurisdiction in order to lose judicial immunity.

The deliberately defective and void order causes the loss of judicial immunity for the entire judiciary in Healy v Healy. 20 judges of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas. Where EVERY PROCEEDING AND ORDER since 2007 can be demonstrated to be undermined and leveraged by corruption and confidentiality mandated by Rule 1.6. Relitigate? No point. Recovery and escape from further their is a necessity. The case history demonstrates the affect of Rule 1.6 on my rights.

SUPERIOR COURT - CENTRAL LEGAL STAFF

Why would the Central Legal Staff not provide/deliver the appeal to the judges? To protect the judges from acting in a matter where they would have no judicial immunity.

So the Central Legal Staff intercepts and intervenes and acts to conceal the lower courts error, and the lower court's gross negligence when informed of the defect, and the lower court's continued malicious retaliation against the victim of their error.

There is no law which permits the Central Legal Staff to intercept and intervene. Their actions clearly deny due process and access to the court - constitutional violations. Any attempt to conceal their crimes pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality proves that Rule 1.6 causes the denial of constitutionally protected rights of litigant.

Where it denies constitutional rights, the substantive rights of a litigant have been affected demonstrating the lack of authority for the state Supreme Court to enact Rule 1,6 into law.

Rule 1.6 is an unconstitutional nullity - NOT A LAW.


PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL, KATHLEEN KANE

Where required by Rule 521 to notify the state Attorney general where the constitutionality of a law will come into question, PA Attorney General Kathleen Kane was notified of the three appeals in the Superior Court AND that the constitutionality of Rule 1,.6 would be called into question.

Filed in good faith, I did not expect the Central Legal Staff to demonstrate the unconstitutional affect of Rule 1.6.

Attorney General Kathleen Kane was subsequently ordered to silence by secret court orders from two different courts. The orders further prevented her from performing the functions and responsibilities of the Attorney General.

A Grand Jury called Kathleen Kane to testify under strict confidentiality which would prevent disclosure and investigative action by the attorney general.

The Norristown Grand Jury seeks to conceal the evidence of the extreme malicious corruption and cruelty of Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio in the matter of Healy v Healy.

The Grand Jury is being run by Special Prosecutor Thomas Carluccio. Had any other attorney been running the grand jury, they could be compelled to testify about the matter. A husband cannot be compelled to testify against his wife. The Norristown Grand Jury seeks to conceal the evidence.

Secret Order #1 was issued by the Superior Court of Pennsylvania demanding silence and non-participation of the attorney general. An act of judicial corruption and manipulation which prevents the attorney general from performing her job responsibilities and violates her oath of office.

Secret Order #2 was issued by the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas demanding silence and non-participation of the attorney general while seeking to determine the amount of information the attorney general already knew about Healy v Healy and the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 - and then requiring the information to be suppressed.

THE SECRET IS THAT INJUSTICE IS INESCAPABLE WHILE THE JUDICIARY VIOLATE THE PUBLIC TRUST TO PERPETUATE A CONSPIRACY OF CORRUPTION INITIATED BY THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION.

A secret order by a secret judge can not be secretly enforced... the judge and the court would have to reveal themselves to the public.. exposing their corruption to sunlight.

I believe it is time for Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane to break her silence.

I would hope she is joined by Attorney General Eric Holder and President Barack Obama.

I would hope they are supported by every state Attorney General - who have had their deliberate default action in the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 undermined and silenced.

I respectfully and sincerely request the support of every American to restore justice and the US Constitution.

Every. Person. Matters.
JUSTICE NOW.
Equality

Interest in this letter?

There seems to be an increased interest in this letter from around the web.

Letter to District Attorney Risa Ferman

The DA ignored it completely. A clear demonstration of no protection of the law.

The judges neglected and failed to enforce my wife to comply with ANY court order. Usually where compliance would reveal her private telephone, the private investigator, the surveillance software company, provide medical benefits, permit me to see my children.

The alternative was aggressive enforcement of EVERY court order, where I proved the fraud of Angst & Angst each time. They would lie about statements on court orders and then attempt to enforce their fiction.

Their intrusive technology was detected and reported and recorded... BUT there was no way to end the terror. It still continues to affect my devices and those of my friends.

There were indications that the page had been hacked and was not being displayed. Hopefully I have corrected the issue.

The May 2009 letter had a wide distribution. I never imagined I would still be battling these idiots for the remainder of my life.

cc:
CNN – NEWDESK, One CNN Center, Atlanta, GA 30303
ABC News, 7 West 66th Street, New York, NY 10023
NBC News, 30 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, N.Y. 10112
CBS Television, 51 West 52nd Street, New York, NY 10019

WPVI-TV/DT – NEWSDESK, 4100 City Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19131
NBC-10 News Line, 10 Monument Rd, Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004
CBS 3 – NEWSDESK, 1555 Hamilton Street, Philadelphia, PA 19130
FOX 29 – NEWSDESK, 330 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106
CW Philly 57-WPSG-TV – NEWSDESK, 1555 Hamilton St, Philadelphia, PA 19130
KYW Newsradio 1060: News Department, 400 Market St, Philadelphia, PA 19106

The Inquirer – NEWSDESK, 400 N. Broad St., Philadelphia, PA 19130
Daily News – NEWS DESK, 400 N. Broad St., Philadelphia, PA 19130
Intelligencer, 333 N Broad St, Doylestown, PA 18901
Reporter, 307 Derstine Ave, Lansdale, PA 19446
The Times Herald, 410 Markley St, Norristown, PA 19401

Governor Edward G. Rendell
225 Main Capitol Building
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120

Tom Corbett
Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General
16th Floor, Strawberry Square
Harrisburg, PA 17120

Hon. Kate Harper
1515 Dekalb Pike Suite 106
Blue Bell, PA 19422

Hon. Rick Taylor
701 Horsham Road
Suite 101
Horsham, PA 19044

Stewart J. Greenleaf
Senate District 12
711 York Road
Willow Grove, PA 19090

Allyson Y. Schwartz
U.S. Representative
706 West Avenue
Jenkintown, PA 19046

Robert P. Casey, Jr.
393 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Arlen Specter
711 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

President Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Affecting Justice - Motivation, Rationale and Impossibility of Resolution

DRAFT

The Impossibility of Resolution can be demonstrated. Those who conspired to deny and prevent justice can be held legally responsible for criminal actions, denial of constitutional rights, their negligence in applying the Rule of Law, and obstruction of justice. The IMMUNITIES - Absolute, Qualified, Judicial, Prosecutorial, Witness, Legislative - do not prevent criminal and civil actions against those involved.

This document will attempt to address the general aspects affecting everyone involved. It will be as short as it has to be. My hope is to provide an outline which will permit deliberate and immediate attention and corrective actions by the people and the organizations involved. I do not anticipate a detailed listing of criminal statues with assignment to the individuals and officials involved. The scope of this document will likely overwhelm any reader. I know the rationale for the corruption, perversion and denial of justice. I know why they are continuing with the intentional and deliberate negligence and fraud. I have acted because of necessity in good faith within procedures and law towards a resolution. Survivors of this type of injustice fall into three categories 1) Homeless/Destitute, 2) Incarcerated, 3) Suicide. Those responsible don't care. THEY HAVE DONE THIS TO MILLIONS OF PEOPLE - they know their constitutional rights were denied and ignored without explanation and in contradiction to the applicable law. I have never acted with malice or aggression towards anyone. I have never attempted to solicit or coerce any action by anyone which would subject them to negative affects due to a perception of having helped me improperly. When help was requested, I was ignored. I begged. I begged everyone. My documents and personal presentation has always been respectful. I have been subjected to tremendous disrespect, discourtesy, misinformation, disinformation, deliberate misdirection and misuse of government resources. The actions and efforts involved in the conspiracy to conceal an act of judicial misconduct/injustice prevented it from being addressed/resolved, while spawning unending and ever-expanding activities which attack and destroy every aspect of my life. Where actions against me were unlawful, and violated my civil and constitutional rights, I make no excuses and do not excuse those who tore my life apart. I did nothing to deserve this. Why are they preventing any exit?

The description in the header of the web site summarizes with precision the experience, the current situation and the action necessary for resolution. It was first posted in 2008. It has only been edited ONCE. In July 2013,recognizing that EVERY failure of legal professionals to act or respond could be attributed to and concealed by one state law - - Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct

I am a sane man dealing with an absolutely insane situation.

Every person in a position to help has acted improperly in direct violation of procedures and the law preventing the resolution of any matter…

They each make the situation worse…

NO ONE HELPED…

NO ONE COULD HELP… until the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6.

---

Insert Healy v Healy Injustice and Denial of Rights and the Law here.

---

Healy v Healy Superior Court Fraud here

---

Attorney General Kathleen Kane
- Rule 521 Constitutional issue
- Secret Court Orders which prevent AG Kane from disclosing investigating or acting

---

Montgomery County Grand Jury Investigation
Special Prosecutor Carluccio
Is this Grand Jury called to conceal evidence? Emails?

Having Spec Prosecutor Carluccio would prevent him from having to disclose the efforts of the grand jury to suppress evidence which could be used against his wife, Judge Carluccio, who used emails to cancel multiple hearings, who has prevented the appeal of her defective and void order, who has deliberately neglected to address her defective and void order.
- the defective and void order was referred to as an UNAPPEALABLE ORDER
- It was appealable, BUT she blocked it for over a year, the superior court neglects to address the lack of jurisdiction to issue the order, the violation of the law, and the loss of judicial immunity for herself and the prior judges who conspired to deny justice
- Judge Carluccio's retaliatory and void court orders caused irreparable damage to property and showed an abuse of power under color of law with intent to cause emotional distress

- Healy v Healy has been before 20 judges from the Montgomery County Judiciary
- each sacrifices their integrity to conceal the lack of integrity of the prior judges
- immunity is not available to the judges where there orders lacked jurisdiction and the entire matter can be demonstrated to have been a farce of epic cruel proportions.

Attorney General Kathleen Kane prevented from disclosing information

---

Superior Court Central Legal Staff
Intercept and Fraud to deny appeal
County, State and Federal prosecution for violating PA Law and Constitutional Rights

---

Healy v Miller Injustice and Denial of Rights and the Law here.
Attorney Liability - failed to provide any real basis in law for dismissal ignoring lack of jurisdiction.

---

Healy v Miller Superior Court Fraud here

---

Attorney General Kathleen Kane
- Rule 521 Constitutional issue
- Secret Court Orders which prevent AG Kane from disclosing investigating or acting

---

Superior Court Central Legal Staff
Intercept and Fraud to deny appeal
County, State and Federal prosecution for violating PA Law and Constitutional Rights

---

.

PROBLEM:
A law designed to ignore judicial corruption and injustice which includes an aggressively enforced MANDATE of silence for all lawyers while ignoring, denying and preventing the constitutional rights of a litigant has been enacted by the state supreme court in every state without proper construction, without constitutional review, without involvement of any state legislature and without the signature of any governor.

Where the law affects the substantive rights of a litigant, the state supreme courts were without proper authority to enact the law pursuant to the state constitutions. Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information is repugnant to the US Constitution, and is a nullity.

For more information: An Overview of the Challenge to Rule 1.6

The problem is national. Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information has been enacted in every state... (There are some slight modifications in some states. Contrary to the profound objection of the commission chairman, Robert Kutak, The American Bar Association deliberately removed the 'fraud provisions' from Rule 1.6 before presenting the Model Rules to the states.)

---

Having Rule 1.6 suspended, removed or declared unconstitutional will restore constitutional rights and equal protection of the law.

Judges, lawyers and legal professionals are not permitted to disclose information which will adversely affect the integrity of the court pursuant to Rule 1.6.

The following public officials are prevented by Rule 1.6 from exposing unconstitutional Rule 1.6 injustice:
State Supreme Court Justices
State Attorneys General
Commonwealth Court Judges
County District Attorneys
Superior Court Judges
Every judge and lawyer in every state

Lawyers in the state senates and legislatures
State Governors who are lawyers
US Senators who are lawyers
US Representatives who are lawyers
They are also permitted/required to act pursuant to Rule 1.6 to prevent unconstitutional Rule 1.6 injustice from being exposed. Their actions may not be disclosed, evwen when they are in the furtherance of the injustice.


The non-lawyer Governors seek advice from their lawyer or the state attorney general - who are not permitted to expose the issue or take any action.

The non-lawyer US Senators seek advice from their lawyers - who are not permitted to expose the issue or take any action.

The non-lawyer US Representative seek advice from their lawyers - who are not permitted to expose the issue or take any action.

Police will not take a complaint of judicial corruption.

County Detectives report to the District Attorneys who are not permitted to expose the issue or take any action.

RULE 1.6 HAS BUILT IN SELF-DEFENSE AND PRESERVATION NON-DISCLOSURE
- preventing disclosure
- preventing any effort to remove the law
- permitting fraud in the effort to maintain confidentiality (with that fraud kept confidential)

The County Sheriff is usually a non-lawyer with authority to enforce every law. After Rule 1.6 was enacted in each state, the sheriffs were informed of a greatly diminished role in law enforcement by the state attorney general, the judiciary and their lawyers. Many states have gone as far as eliminating the position of sheriff. The county sheriff takes no action to address the injustice.


FEDERAL AUTHORITIES - DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Marketed as an ethical fix for DOJ prosecutors, the McDade-Murtha Amendment was passed requiring DOJ and all federal government lawyers to follow the ethics rules which are in effect in the location where they are working.

The US Attorney General advised and campaigned against enacting the McDade-Murtha Amendment. Their campaign was somewhat half-hearted though... because Rule 1.6 already prevented them from telling the Congress exactly why it would be "devastatingly bad".

In congressional hearings, there was no testimony that Rule 1.6 made fraud legal when concealing prior fraud, and prevented disclosure or action to rectify the fraud. The state supreme courts had enacted ethics laws which lacked morality, required illegal actions to conceal and prevent exposure of fraud, and mandated non-disclosure/confidentiality of their participation in the fraud.

With the McDade-Murtha Amendment, the Federal Government - Department of Justice - all US Attorneys - and all government attorneys are not permitted to expose the issue, or take any action to expose the issue, or take any action to address the injustice and/or the related denial of constitutionally protected rights in any state.

TAKING THE CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUE TO THE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT

Bradley Stone - Another Family Court Suicide

Rest in Peace, brother...

They provoked you to the brink and blamed you for breaking.

My efforts to regain my constitutional rights and the protection of the law continue... for myself and other victims of judicial injustice.

My condolences to your family.

---

WHY DOES TERANCE HEALY CARE ABOUT THE BRADLEY STONE STORY?

It's simple... because they tried to do the same thing to me.
...because Bradley Stone lost his voice in a media that never asks WHY DID HE DO THAT?
...because he will be dismissed an an angry divorce dad.
...because there was no alternatives to the abusive treatment.
...because the judges do not give a damn about you.
...because the courthouse people don't care.
...because an unwarranted level of disrespect and disdain exists for litigants
...because they are so threatened by what they have witnessed happening to nice trusting people
...because someone from the county (MCES) likely visited Bradley Stone 'to check on him' without knowing WHY they were checking on him... or who told them to do it.
...because no one deserves to be pushed to the point of suicide

The courthouse staff worries about what a person might do to them if they ever really find out everything being done to them... There's all kinds of secret orders, search warrants, wiretaps, etc... Too many secrets, false allegations, covert investigations, private investigators, DUI set-ups. They exist to secretly destroy a person... and the judges and lawyers watch and hide behind 'confidentiality'... and call you paranoid. It's not paranoia when it is happening.
DON'T ROLL YOUR EYES JUST YET... I"VE GOT RECEIPTS - PROOF - EVIDENCE.

Only in the Family Courts can someone who has committed no crime lose everything.

Divorce does NOT create the kind of response Bradley demonstrated.
INJUSTICE DOES.

When you have no protection of the law, ANYONE can hurt you and face no repercussions.
When you have no constitutional rights, ANYONE can say anything in a court room AND YOU LOSE.
When you beg for help, NO ONE HELPS. NO ONE. ANYWHERE.

It's not about gender, race, political parties or any of the other ways which are used to divide people.

It's about JUSTICE.

Race comes into it QUICKLY because when it comes to understanding INJUSTICE white people are completely clueless and the idea of injustice is incomprehensible. Whites who think they know still cannot imagine the experience. They read my web site and say "They can't do that." They know nothing of injustice.

White people do not understand injustice... they think the justice system works. They roll their eyes and figure you did something to deserve it. They will not believe you until they witness it... and even then they are in disbelief of what they have seen and heard. You cannot convince a white person otherwise... the concept is completely foreign to them.

Black people UNDERSTAND. They live with injustice as a part of their daily lives. They do NOT roll their eyes. They believe what you are saying. Every word. They look you in the eye with a sense of understanding and sadness that the illusion is gone for you. In their minds, they are thinking "THIS WHITE GUY JUST FOUND OUT WHAT WE HAVE KNOWN ALL ALONG."

---

Stone v Stone had been before several judges of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas.
Judge Barrett, Judge Rhonda Daniele, Judge Bertin, Judge Tolliver, Judge Tilson

Montgomery County Docket - Stone v Stone

---

1) No more lives torn apart.
2) Wars would never start.
3) Time would heal all hearts.
4) Everyone would have a friend.
5) Right would always win.
6) Love would never end.

This is my only lifelong wish. This is my grown-up Christmas list.

#StopFamilyCourtSuicide

In Defiance of All Logic - A Family Court Face Lift

A FAMILY COURT FACE LIFT
An Article by the Honorable Kelly C. Wall, with contributions and edits from Sarinia M. Feinman, Esq.
Published in SIDEBAR Summer 2014 by the Montgomery Bar Association, Montgomery County Pennsylvania.

This article defies logic in most of the aspects presented. The failure to see the full perspective of every party involved is clear. It seems that the writers are SO IMPRESSED WITH THEMSELVES AND THEIR CAREERS that they have completely ignored the reason they are involved in the first place. How does someone who sits on the Family Court Bench lose sight of the necessity and the people standing before them? And how do they introduce changes which fail to correct or address any of the issues presented. Promptly abandoning the statements presented in her Inquirer Judicial Candidate Questionaire in 2009. The Judicial Branch does NOT have authority to write (or re-write) law. Is the Legislature aware of these actions? Prepare for one convoluted clueless ego trip.

Prior to going on the family bench, I practiced family law for several years. I remember showing up at the judges’ courtroom for short list conferences; there were so many lawyers present in the Courtroom that it felt like a social hour. My fellow lawyers would sit and catch up on each other’s lives as we waited for our turn in the judges’ chambers. That was the perception I had when I was assigned to the Family Bench in January of 2010.

Boy was I shocked!

Shocked? Judge Wall had no knowledge or awareness about the working of the Family Court. Short List conferences are wasted days for the litigants and the lawyers. Unrepresented litigants are the last to be called. They wait the entire day observing 'the dance.' Lawyer & Lawyer go to the Judge's Chambers. Their unwelcome clients sit and wait. There is no record of the lawyers conference with the judge. Their clients have no idea what was discussed. Just an outcome, which is often an indication that the requested hearing will be scheduled. This is NOT the "transparent and open to the public" fable from Judge Wall's Election Questionnaire.

The first few months I kept questioning my staff about the whereabouts of the attorneys of record
for the conferences. I quickly learned that the days of litigants having two attorneys were gone and we were lucky if there were one or two cases on the list with even one attorney!

This took MONTHS to figure out? BTW, if it took MONTHS, it was not 'quickly learned'. The 'luck' has another name which is best explained by Canon 1. "A judge shall uphold and promote the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary, and shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety." The 'luck' indicates a lack of independence, integrity, and impartiality which improper or at least appears to be improper. The 'luck' contradicts Canon 1's duty of 'access to justice for all' that reflects adversely on the judge’s honesty, impartiality, temperament, or fitness to serve as a judge.

The dockets were littered with the names of attorneys who, long ago, were fired, replaced or simply not being paid. I soon discovered that the Family Court system was overwhelmed with self-represented parties. This problem was so pervasive that in 2013 a new rule was passed requiring Pro Se litigants to enter their appearances in support and custody cases if there was no active attorney.

Blame it on the litigants? Paying their lawyers to sit in a room for half a day at $300/hour doing nothing - or socializing. Perhaps that explains why the litigant fired, replaced or did not pay their attorney. $300/hour to socialize. Seriously? Filing an appearance is one page. Name. Address. Phone Number. Signature. This filing would not overwhelm a second grade student. Blame the unrepresented litigants? Require more from the unrepresented litigants than from the lawyers. Falsely suggest that you are requiring it for their benefit. A 'pervasive' litter problem caused by the overwhelming volume of self-represented parties is best addressed by Canon 2. "A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially, competently, and diligently." "Luck' is an absence of objectivity and open-mindedness, and a clear bias and prejudice which undermines and fails to ensure pro se litigants the opportunity to have matters heard fairly and impartially. In the Questionnaire, Judge Wall indicated her "care and compassion will ensure that I treat all litigants equally" - a clear contradiction to the 'luck' of having EVEN ONE lawyer in the courtrooms.

I also learned that there was a plethora of repetitious filings; the Pro Se parties would often file several petitions at one time containing the same averments but different titles, or they would file petitions for modification within weeks or months of agreed orders or comprehensive orders entered after
protracted hearings. The cases were burdened with economic issues, drug and alcohol abuse, and/or mental health problems. With no attorneys available for guidance or counsel, the judges were forced to wear several hats: judge, attorney, therapist and parent. We were seeing people at their lowest point with
no legal assistance and no place to turn but to the Court system. The end result was a family court system burdened with climbing inventories, escalating emergency petitions, long delays in scheduling, and a drain on the Court and Court Administration’s time and resources.

A PLETHORA OF REPETITIOUS FILINGS. AT THE SAME TIME. SAYING THE SAME THING. This is a FALSEHOOD. The unrepresented don't have the time for that. NOBODY HAS TIME FOR THAT. The cases burdened with other issues, abuses and problems... LIKE ALL CASES. This is Family Court where the litigants are adults seeking an informed resolution to the issue before the court. The tremendous disdain for unrepresented litigants is again indicated where absent an "attorney for guidance or counsel" the judge is forced to be judge, attorney, therapist and parent. The statement lacks any logical connection to any reality. Perhaps Judge Wall has had a stroke.

In 2013, President Judge William J. Furber, Jr. asked me to step in as Administrative Judge of Family Court. I was both flattered that he believed I was capable of taking on that role with only three years under my belt in the third largest County in Pennsylvania, but I was also scared - very scared! It was a big undertaking and I never do things half way. I agreed to take on the challenge but only after Judge Furber assured me he would support my changes and commit to recognizing the importance of the Family Bench. I accepted the challenge and then the fun started!

Only a fool would promise to support changes prior to analysis and review. Another self-serving paragraph where the vocabulary contradicts the statements. Capable? Scared - Seriously? BIG UNDERTAKING? Challenge? Support? Commit? These sentences are constructed without logic or purpose.

I met with a diverse group of family attorneys and together we came up with an assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the Family Court, from the Bar’s perspective. Michael R. Kehs and
Cheryl Leslie from Court Administration were extremely supportive and helpful in adding to the Court’s perspective. As result of those meetings, a big picture plan emerged to make our Family Court
more responsive to the needs of the litigants. Now, I just needed to figure out how to get there!

Who has Judge Wall Completely Ignored? No participation by the unrepresented Pro Se litigants. The handwriting is on the wall. The big plan to address the needs of the litigants.

Some of the changes were easy: We initiated fees for petitions to modify, provided more stringent requirements for in forma pauperis status, and encourage our judges to enter more interim orders.

How do these changes address the NEEDS of the litigants? THEY DON'T!! Fees for Petitions - Additional costs for the litigants. - No added value to litigant. - No added benefit for litigant. Stringent In Forma Pauperis Requirements - More effort required by the litigants - More stringent requirements PLACED UPON THE DESTITUTE without any benefit for the litigant [In Healy v Healy...] [Judge Wall has failed to address an IFP petition filed on December 7, 2010] [Judge Wall has failed to address an IFP petition filed on December 14, 2010] [Judge Carluccio has failed to address an IFP petition filed on August 15, 2011] [Judge Carluccio has failed to address an IFP petition filed on September 19, 2011] [My contribution to THE PLETHORA of repetitious filings.] [Judge Page revoked an IFP without explanation to prevent an Appeal to Superior Court] [To have that revocation appealed, it would be necessary to FIRST obtain an IFP. Seriously.] Interim Orders - More interim orders. - No justification or explanation for this. - I suggest caution where ex parte orders are concealed and prevented from any proceeding.

Thanks to Judge Del Ricci, my colleagues on the Civil Bench cheerfully adopted some family cases in 2013 and were immensely helpful in putting a dent in our huge inventories. Those small changes were very positive and have laid the framework for the bigger change that are in motion at this time.

It's peculiar because Judge DelRicci and Judge Carluccio already took credit for clearing much of the court backlog in an event recorded on ITUNES and published in several periodicals and papers.

With the assistance of Sarinia M. Feinman, Chair of the Family Law Section, and various volunteers from
the Section’s sub-committees, we have made great strides. I wanted to take this opportunity to share the new rules that have been passed or are forthcoming and introduce the new programs that will
streamline Family Court procedures and bring aid to the Pro Se litigants.

LAWYERS MAKING WORK FOR LAWYERS. The only profession which can spontaneously create an economy for their workers. Injustice generates more revenue than justice.

Finally, I want to recognize the people who are willingly lending their assistance and expertise to changing the face of the Family Court.

"bring aid to the Pro Se litigants" WHAT? WHERE? WHEN? HOW? A Bar Association lawyer, with input from other lawyers under her direction.... WHAT GREAT STRIDES? There is no logic to any statements. There is no logic to any action. There is only an imaginary benefit to the litigant. What has been accomplished? assisted? changed? for all the gratitude? The only benefit is EXTRA fees. The suggestion that using a lawyer to obtain an interim order from a judge can circumvent the current procedure and law. HOW IS UNDERMINING THE CASE OF A PRO SE LITIGANT BENEFICIAL? Where is that benefit for the Pro Se Litigant? It was the alleged motivation and purpose of the proposed changes.

---

---

EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION & DIVORCE
Moving Equitable Distribution online
- Much to my surprise, I discovered that the equitable distribution (ED) scheduling system was not automated and the filing system was comprised of 5 x 7 cards! There was no way to track cases once a Grounds Order was issued moving the matters to equitable distribution, and there were open cases from the late 1990s! An intern painstakingly created a spreadsheet identifying cases where Grounds Orders were filed before 2012, which were then Continued on next pagedesignated for the ED Special Master program as described below. Cheryl Leslie is in the process of working with our IT department to incorporate the scheduling of ED cases into the existing family scheduling system. The new ED system will allow the Equitable Distribution Masters’ office to issue scheduling orders and Court Administration will be able to track the cases and keep them moving on a timelier basis from the date of the Grounds Order through the entry of the final Divorce Decree.

Equitable Distribution Special Master’s Program
- Once we identified the 220 plus oldest cases with no current activity, we designated them for the ED Special Master’s program. We enlisted the aid of the Honorable Arthur R. Tilson, who agreed to sit as a special master in equitable distribution to hear these cases and enter recommendations.

Within a few months, through the combined efforts of Cheryl Leslie, Judge Tilson and Margaret Carter, 1 administrative assistant to the senior judges, we were able to reduce the inventory of the oldest cases by nearly 200! The program will continue indefinitely as we try to bring the inventory up to date to prepare for the automation of the equitable distribution scheduling system, the new local equitable distribution rule, and the new Court procedures to effectuate the new rule.

Equitable Distribution Rule Change
- After working with the Family Law Section Chairs, Christian V. Badali in 2013 and Sarinia M. Feinman in 2014 for over a year, as well as the ED Sub-Committee of the Family Law Section, President Judge Furber and I signed NEW Local Rule 1920.73(c), which was certified by the Prothonotary, Mark Levy, on May 20, 2014. This Rule was to become effective 30 days after it was published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin
on June 7, 2014. Thus, the new Rule became effective as of Monday, July 7, 2014, but the new ED Fee ($400.00) that accompanies the Rule will not become effective until Monday, August 4, 2014, as the Prothonotary needed more time to get all of the computer programming and forms in place.

The new Local Rule includes a slightly modified Form for the Praecipe to Transmit the Record, and completely new Form for a Motion for Entry of Grounds Order and Appointment of Equitable Distribution Master. In an effort to avoid the extreme backup in the ED process, in order to obtain a Grounds Order and proceed to an ED Master, beginning on August 4th, you will have to pay the $400.00 fee to get to the Master. Further, as part of the new Rule, you will not be able to get scheduled before an ED Master until you certify that your discovery is completed and you are ready to have a meaningful conference and/or hearing with the Master to work towards settlement of the case. The hope is that this will force parties to come prepared to the first conference before the Master with an informed knowledge of the assets and liabilities that comprise the marital estate, so that the parties can discuss settlement or be able to schedule a timely hearing. Moreover,the new Rule should reduce the number of Pro Se filers who are simply seeking to divide up personal property where there are no other marital assets. In summary, the new Rule will ensure that only those cases that really need the Masters’ attention will have to be scheduled, thereby resulting in less delay and a reduced inventory for the ED Masters.

Date of Separation Issues
- Another change that has been enacted is the elimination of Special Masters being assigned to deal with date of separation issues that arise in divorce cases. It came to the Court’s attention, via the Chair of the Family Law Section, Sarinia M. Feinman, that there was no clear path of what was to occur procedurally once a full hearing was held before a Special Master regarding date of separation and Exceptions were filed to the Special Master’s Recommendation. There were no clear rules outlining whether this would be a De Novo Hearing or Oral Argument before the assigned Judge.

I discovered that Pro Se parties and/or cases with counsel were having full “on the record” hearings before the Special Master only to be potentially obliged to have another full hearing before the assigned Judge. This not only seemed like a waste of time and money for the clients, but also for the Special
Masters and Judges. Therefore, since there are no state or local rules designating special masters for date of separation issues, moving forward, if a date of separation issue arises, the assigned Judge will hear that issue from the outset, and Special Masters will no longer be utilized for this purpose, so as to promote efficiency for everyone and limit the delay.

If you would like to hear more about the new ED process that went into effect as of July 7th, please attend the Family Law Section Meeting and luncheon on Wednesday, August 6, 2014 at noon for a Town Hall Meeting, where there will also be an opportunity for feedback and questions from practitioners.

Special thanks to Cheryl Leslie, Erin Carter, our Equitable Distribution Masters, Gordon M. Mair and Bruce L. Goldenberg, and the Family Law Section’s Equitable Distribution Sub-Committee for their hard work, assistance and cooperation in updating our Equitable Distribution System.

MOTIONS COURT
- Overwhelmingly, the biggest request I received from the family lawyers was to create a Family Court
Motions Court. One of the greatest challenges we face is crafting procedures for a dedicated Motions
Court while maintaining the integrity of our “One Judge - One Family” policy which ensures that one
judge is assigned to a family throughout the case. The advantage to our “One Judge - One Family” system
is that we have a unique perspective of our individual families and can enter comprehensive orders rather
than having litigants appear before a different judge every time they enter the Courthouse.

Presently, family judges conduct short list conferences which are scheduled four to six weeks after a petition is filed. Parties can file emergency petitions seeking a quicker disposition of matters; however, judges are often inundated with petitions that do not rise to the level of an emergency and they have to weed out the real emergencies from the cases that can wait for a short list date.

A dedicated Motions Court would allow judges to hear certain matters on their cases much more quickly and efficiently. The benefits to a motions court system are threefold; parties can resolve problems quickly as a matter could be scheduled within days, orders will be issued that same day from the bench, and judges will reduce their short list matters which will allow more timely listings for protracted cases.

Although the details of the Motions Court are still being worked out with a local rule anticipated to go into effect in early 2015, you can expect that the matters handled in Motions Court will be those that are appropriate for decisions to be made from the bench and those matters that take no more than 10 minutes to argue on both sides. As of now, my Motions Court dates for the remainder of this year will be as follows: July 30; August 27; September 10 & 24; October 15 & 20; November 12 & 26; and December 10 & 22. Commencing in January of 2015, my Motions Court will generally be scheduled on the second and
fourth Wednesdays of the month. The Honorable Gail A. Weilheimer will also be participating in the Motions Court, and she will be providing her Motions Court dates in the near future. Some of the other Family Court Judges have expressed an interest in the new Motions Court rule, so that they may also participate in this program for their cases.

Special thanks to Cheryl Leslie, Joel B. Bernbaum, chair of the Family Law Section Motions Court sub-committee, as well as the other members of the sub-committee for their hard work, assistance and cooperation in assisting to get the Family Motions Court underway.

FRIEND OF THE COURT
- Presiding over Protection from Abuse (“PFA”) cases is one of the more challenging opportunities the family judge faces. There are well over forty cases per week and the litigants are angry, scared or emotionally drained. We are extremely fortunate to have the presence of Carol Horvitz and the volunteers from the Women’s Center who lend assistance and guidance to the Court. However, it quickly became apparent to me that a majority of the cases involved deteriorating familial relationships rather than
domestic abuse. The volunteers are wonderful at working with the parties to encourage settlements; however they are limited to what kind of advice they can give as they are not attorneys. I have observed numerous lost opportunities to direct Pro Se litigants toward the Lawyer Referral Service for consultations or to Domestic Relations or Court Administration to file family petitions.

I originally teamed up with Joo Park and Harry Byrne, co-chairs of the Pro Bono Committee, to discuss putting together a group of volunteers to represent Pro Se litigants in PFA Court. Our project got a big boost when Sharron L. Rex, a former Custody Conciliator in Montgomery County, offered to help launch a PFA volunteer program. The MBA has also expressed an interest in teaming up with the Temple University
Beasley School of Law to enact a third-year student volunteer program for PFA Court.

Additionally, we are in the process of observing similar programs in both Allegheny and Bucks Counties and have received insightful input from Legal Aid representatives and the Women’s Center. With the help of a talented group of people, we are currently in the process of developing a “Friend of the Court” program, whereby both plaintiffs and defendants may receive free representation in our weekly PFA Court by licensed attorneys or students working under the guidance of a licensed attorney. The goal is to provide training to the volunteers in exchange for CLE credits who will, in turn, donate their time
and efforts to representing both plaintiffs and defendants and lend guidance to steer Pro Se litigants away from PFA Court and toward the services they need to resolve their domestic disputes. Although there are many factors yet to be determined such as funding, office space, and administration, we are very
excited about this program and hope to see a working model in the late fall.

SUPPORT
- Gary Kline, Director of the Montgomery County Domestic Relations Office (“DRO”), has been recognized by the Commonwealth on an annual basis for the record amount of past due support collected by his office. To ensure thatthe trend continues, we have been collaborating on ways to decrease the number of contempt hearings that the judges have to hear on a weekly basis and put pressure on the defendants to force them to pay up. Every Friday morning, the DRO officers wheel over large boxes filled to the brim with the files representing the obligors who failed to pay their monthly support orders. Defendants often have multiple cases with large arrears and many are repeat offenders.

In a project aimed at reducing delinquent child support among the most egregious payers, DRO has selected specific cases and assigned them to Judge Barrett and me. The goal for the officer in DRO is to have the case removed from the general Friday contempt list by obtaining an initial payment on the support obligation. The defendants are contacted after being scheduled and told this is their last chance to comply before seeing a judge. If a payment is obtained, the case is removed from the list and scheduled for the next court list before the assigned judge. The case is then monitored for the next several months’ payments and the cycle continues until such time as the payments are received for four to six months consecutively, or the defendant obtains employment and a wage attachment is issued. If a hearing is necessary, the assigned judge has the option of finding the defendant in contempt and ordering incarceration or placing them in the monthly monitoring program. The key for the program to be a success is the rapid access directly to the court in front of the assigned judge, who is familiar with the party and the history of nonpayment.

Another benefit is that the program will reduce the Friday lists and eliminate multiple judges making decisions on the same group of delinquent obligors. Although the program is still in its infancy, to date, more than 70% of the cases identified have made regular payments.

In addition to the new support monitoring program, our new Sheriff, Russell Bono, has committed the resources of his office to the ongoing collection of outstanding child support.

The Sheriff has turned up the pressure on support delinquents by conducting routine roundups which are covered by the media and have resulted in the collection of thousands of dollars in a short period. Moreover, Gary Kline was happy to report that Montgomery County has the lowest number of DRO bench warrants it has ever recorded, and has over 100 less than the closest similarly sized county in the region.

Gary Kline reported 267 outstanding warrants at this time (which includes defendants who reside outside of the state) as compared to 800 a few years ago. Way to go Gary Kline and Sheriff Bono!

SUMMARY
-There are still so many things to do! We will continue to assess programs and staff duties to improve Family Court Services. We will continue to identify any problems as they arise and strive to find solutions for those problems, so as to promote efficiency and expediency in the Court system.

Many thanks to Court Administrator Michael R. Kehs and President Judge William J. Furber, Jr. who kept his promise and supported the new changes, and a special thanks to Sarinia M. Feinman, of the law firm of Vetrano & Vetrano, for her incredible contributions, support, and hard work.

Finally, I want to acknowledge the Honorable Rhonda Lee Daniele for her many years of service as Administrative Judge of Family Court. I have gained new found respect for her and wish to thank her for all of her hard work.

---

This article is pure disinformation and misdirection.