FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
| Terance Healy | ) |
| Todd M. Krautheim | ) |
| in the name of the United States | ) Civil Action No# 13-4614 |
| ) | |
| v. | ) |
| Kathleen Kane | ) |
| Pennsylvania Attorney General; | ) |
| and | ) |
| The Attorneys General of the United States | ) |
1. A Complaint Constitutional Challenge was filed on August 8, 20913 with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
2. Deputy Clerk Patricia A. Jones issued a Summons which was delivered to the Plaintiffs for service to the Attorneys General.
3. All Attorneys General were served the initial pleading, summons, and notice on August 13, 2013.
4. A Certificate os Service was filed on September 6, 2013 with copis of signature cards indicating receipt of documents by each of the Attorneys General.
ATTORNEY GENERAL
5. A Response has not been received or filed with the clerk of courts from the above-named Attorney General.
6. There is no record of a praecipe filed with the Clerk of Courts regarding appearance of counsel for the above-named Attorney General.
7. There is no record of representation entered into the Electronic Case Filing ("ECF"), or request to be excused from using the ECF for the above-named Attorney General.
8. The record indicates no representation for the Attorney General to receive documents filed with and issued by the Court which utilizes ECF as a device for service to parties.
9. The records contain no indication that the above-named Attorney General has been informed or has any awareness of pleadings, responses, motions and rulings in this ongoing matter.
INDICATION OF INTENT TO DEFAULT
10. Plaintiffs respectfully request clarification if it is the intention of the Attorney General to not respond and to accept the default ruling in this matter.
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court to Order the above-named Attorney General; to provoide an indication of their intention, an appearance by their representative counsel, an indication of awareness of this ongoing matter by motion or a response to the initial pleading filed on August 8, 2013.
Respectfully,
| Terance Healy | Todd M. Krautheim |
| 871 Mustang Road | 207 Woodspring Circle |
| Warrington, PA 18976 | Doylestown, PA 18901 |
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (ALABAMA)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (ALASKA)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (AMERICAN SAMOA)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (ARIZONA)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (ARKANSAS)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (CALIFORNIA)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (COLORADO)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (CONNECTICUT)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (DELAWARE)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (FLORIDA)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (GEORGIA)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (GUAM)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (HAWAII)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (IDAHO)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (ILLINOIS)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (INDIANA)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (IOWA)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (KANSAS)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (KENTUCKY)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (LOUISIANA)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (MAINE)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (MARYLAND)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (MASSACHUSETTS)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (MICHIGAN)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (MINNESOTA)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (MISSISSIPPI)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (MISSOURI)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (MONTANA)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (NEBRASKA)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (NEVADA)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (NEW HAMPSHIRE)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (NEW JERSEY)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (NEW MEXICO)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (NEW YORK)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (NORTH CAROLINA)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (NORTH DAKOTA)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (OHIO)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (OKLAHOMA)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (OREGON)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (PUERTO RICO)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (RHODE ISLAND)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (SOUTH CAROLINA)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (SOUTH DAKOTA)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (TENNESSEE)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (TEXAS)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (UTAH)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (VERMONT)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (VIRGIN ISLANDS)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (VIRGINIA)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (WASHINGTON)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (WEST VIRGINIA)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (WISCONSIN)
MOTION FOR INDICATION OF INTENTION TO DEFAULT (WYOMING)
No comments:
Post a Comment