OPINION - Third Circuit Court of Appeals

PLEASE NOTE: THE COURT HAS NEVER INDICATED THAT RULE 1.6 IS CONSTITUTIONAL.
No one has ever said RULE 1.6 is Constitutional.

The Most logical reason for this... BECAUSE IT IS NOT. However, RULE 1.6 mandates the judges and lawyers not say THAT either. When facts and law are NOT discussed, addressed or properly resolved, the resulting injustice is a clear indicator that RULE 1.6 is affecting in the matter.

FACT: RULE 1.6 is affecting the CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE OF RULE 1.6


THE OPINION (PDF Format)
Within the next few days... I will post
- a Breakdown of the incorrect information in the Opinion
- the issues raised on appeal which the Judges neglected to address

THE LETTER

THE COSTS (PDF Format)


THE FEES (PDF Format)

The Fees raises alot of questions. BUT the first thing to consider is that the Attorney General was supposed to be representing the plaintiffs... aka The Public.

Instead, Attorney General Kathleen Kane neglected her clients, the PUBLIC.

Attorney General Kathleen Kane defended her other clients,
1. the Government as a whole,
2. herself as Attorney General,
3. the office of the Attorney General, and
4. the staff of the Attorney General's office

BUT THOSE CLIENTS are there at the request of the PUBLIC, the neglected client.
THOSE CLIENTS are there on behalf of the PUBLIC, the neglected client.

Why does this problem exist for the Attorneys General?... RULE 1.6 - CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION.

Attorney General Kathleen Kane must maintain confidentiality of information for her clients... EVEN WHEN IT CAUSES THE PUBLIC TO BE DENIED OF RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES PROTECTED BY THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.

The twisted law would required Attorney General Kathleen Kane to be disciplined if she even discussed it with herself.

RULE 1.6 is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

JUSTICE IS COMING.