Friday, November 1, 2013

The Eastern District Decision

Onward to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals... As was expected the Challenge was dismissed to proceed to a court where the decision of Constitutionality can be addressed.

The following are their 'silly' reasons... in silly format. We will post the Decision within the next few days.

Ducks
cubecubecubecubecubecubecube




al-roker-2-620x362Marty FeldmanCorey_Feldman_2010


cubecubecubecubecube - cubecubecubecubecubecubecube










cubecubecubecubecubecubecube



The Constitutional rights of people all across the country were prevented from being restored because on KATHLEEN KANE of PENNSYLVANIA. She single-handedly usurped the matter preventing any other state from responding to the matter, hearing about the ongoing litigation.

37 states defaulted and would have restored the constitutional rights of their citizens. Kathleen Kane prevented that from happening.

State Representative Darryl Metcalfe says Kane has created a constitutional crisis. Metcalfe has called for the Impeachment of Kathleen Kane.

Kathleen has responded in typical Rule 1.6 style... the typical accusation. You aint no lawyer. You don't know the law. Victims who have lost their rights have been told this often. Ain't nobody got time for that, Kathleen.

Kathleen Kane NEVER FORGETS her obligation to follow Rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct. She always invokes the US Constitution, the laws of Pennsylvania, and the Rules of Professional Conduct. She know Rule 1.6 TRUMPS everything. She needs to recognize that it cannot lawfully continue to 'trump' the US Constitution. And the Constitutional Challenge would have lawfully allowed her to do so.

No comments:

Post a Comment