November 15, 2014
Gregory R. Neuhauser
Chief Deputy Attorney General
Litigation Section
15th Floor, Strawberry Square
Harrisburg, PA 17120
RE: Your File #3600
With regard to the Notice pursuant to Rule 521.
The Superior Court of PA - Central Legal Staff (CLS) are exposed violating PA Law, and Constitutional Rights. There is no authority for the Central Legal Staff to act alone on matters. They have violated Pennsylvania law, obstructed justice, interfered with the administration of the courts, demonstrated their participation in a conspiracy to deny, prevent and obstruct justice, and committed multiple acts of fraud.
Where these actions demonstrate a denial of constitutionally protected rights, there can be no assertion by CLS that their fraudulent actions can be excused and ignored by asserting Rule 1.6 BECAUSE THAT EXPOSES RULE 1.6 PERMITTING THE DENIAL OF MY CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED RIGHTS. Ergo, Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional.
It is unlikely that any member of the Superior Court Judiciary will come to the aid of the Central Legal Staff with signatures because the level of corruption involved in the lower courts has already demonstrated a lack of judicial independence causing the loss of judicial immunity.
Please review the attached documents filed with the Superior Court.
I wish to have the Central Legal Staff of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania criminally prosecuted to the fullest extent of state and federal law. Please advise, as PA Law requires I delay seeking civil damages until criminal prosecution has been addressed.
Terance Healy
871 Mustang Road
Warrington, PA 18976
Attached:
Notice / Complaint of Unconstitutional Actions
Motion for Reconsideration
Notice of Unavailability of Signed Documents
Motion for Reconsideration of Oral Argument
Motion for Proposed course of Action Towards Resolution
Motion for Production of Documents
Motion for Corrections to The Docket
Motion for the Applicable Rule of Law
ANNOTATED VERSION of unsigned Memorandum
PDF version
Showing posts with label Denial. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Denial. Show all posts
Saturday, November 15, 2014
Letter to US Attorney Zane Memeger
November 15, 2014
Zane Memeger
U.S. Attorney's Office
615 Chestnut Street, Suite 1250
Philadelphia, PA 19106
RE: Complaint Hand Delivered on October 30, 2014
The Superior Court of PA - Central Legal Staff (CLS) are exposed violating PA Law, and Constitutional Rights. There is no authority for the Central Legal Staff to act alone on matters. They have violated Pennsylvania law, obstructed justice, interfered with the administration of the courts, demonstrated their participation in a conspiracy to deny, prevent and obstruct justice, and committed multiple acts of fraud.
Where these actions demonstrate a denial of constitutionally protected rights, there can be no assertion by CLS that their fraudulent actions can be excused and ignored by asserting Rule 1.6 BECAUSE THAT EXPOSES RULE 1.6 PERMITTING THE DENIAL OF MY CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED RIGHTS. Ergo, Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional.
It is unlikely that any member of the Superior Court Judiciary will come to the aid of the Central Legal Staff with signatures because the level of corruption involved in the lower courts has already demonstrated a lack of judicial independence causing the loss of judicial immunity.
Please review the attached documents filed with the Superior Court.
I wish to have the Central Legal Staff of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania criminally prosecuted to the fullest extent of state and federal law. Please advise, as PA Law requires I delay seeking civil damages until criminal prosecution has been addressed.
Terance Healy
871 Mustang Road
Warrington, PA 18976
Attached:
Notice / Complaint of Unconstitutional Actions
Motion for Reconsideration
Notice of Unavailability of Signed Documents
Motion for Reconsideration of Oral Argument
Motion for Proposed course of Action Towards Resolution
Motion for Production of Documents
Motion for Corrections to The Docket
Motion for the Applicable Rule of Law
ANNOTATED VERSION of unsigned Memorandum
PDF version
Zane Memeger
U.S. Attorney's Office
615 Chestnut Street, Suite 1250
Philadelphia, PA 19106
RE: Complaint Hand Delivered on October 30, 2014
The Superior Court of PA - Central Legal Staff (CLS) are exposed violating PA Law, and Constitutional Rights. There is no authority for the Central Legal Staff to act alone on matters. They have violated Pennsylvania law, obstructed justice, interfered with the administration of the courts, demonstrated their participation in a conspiracy to deny, prevent and obstruct justice, and committed multiple acts of fraud.
Where these actions demonstrate a denial of constitutionally protected rights, there can be no assertion by CLS that their fraudulent actions can be excused and ignored by asserting Rule 1.6 BECAUSE THAT EXPOSES RULE 1.6 PERMITTING THE DENIAL OF MY CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED RIGHTS. Ergo, Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional.
It is unlikely that any member of the Superior Court Judiciary will come to the aid of the Central Legal Staff with signatures because the level of corruption involved in the lower courts has already demonstrated a lack of judicial independence causing the loss of judicial immunity.
Please review the attached documents filed with the Superior Court.
I wish to have the Central Legal Staff of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania criminally prosecuted to the fullest extent of state and federal law. Please advise, as PA Law requires I delay seeking civil damages until criminal prosecution has been addressed.
Terance Healy
871 Mustang Road
Warrington, PA 18976
Attached:
Notice / Complaint of Unconstitutional Actions
Motion for Reconsideration
Notice of Unavailability of Signed Documents
Motion for Reconsideration of Oral Argument
Motion for Proposed course of Action Towards Resolution
Motion for Production of Documents
Motion for Corrections to The Docket
Motion for the Applicable Rule of Law
ANNOTATED VERSION of unsigned Memorandum
PDF version
Friday, October 10, 2014
ex tenebris ad lucem 2
Breakdown of Rule 1.6 Issues - Volume List
| - Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct | Volume 1 |
| - Improperly Enacted by the state supreme court(s) | Volume 2 |
| - Presented by the American Bar Association | Volume 3 |
| - Model Rules of Professional Conduct | Volume 4 |
| - The Collateral, Indirect and Absolute Denial of Rights | Volume 5 |
| - Rights Secured and Protected by the Constitution of the United States | Volume 6 |
| - Denying and Preventing Any Protection of the Law | Volume 7 |
| - A Litigant who has been the Victim of Fraud | Volume 8 |
| - Concealed from Disclosure | Volume 9 |
| - All Persons Directly Mandated to Follow the Rules of Professional Conduct | Volume 10 |
| - All lawyers, All judges, and All Law Enforcement | Volume 11 |
| - Within Each State | Volume 13 |
| - Within Each State Government | Volume 14 |
| - Within the Federal Government | Volume 15 |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)