The Day Justice Died

State adoption of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct
(previously the Model Code of Professional Responsibility)

When the Code was enacted into 'law' they changed the name to "Rules".

There is no record of any review of the impact of these 'laws' on the constitutionally protected rights of the people of the United States.

The supposed intent was to make sure the judiciary was never humiliated like they were after the FBI's Operation Graylord. To protect the judiciary they sacrificed the integrity of EVERY JUDGE in the country. As a result, the corruption involved in my one divorce in Montgomery County already includes more judges and court personnel and county agencies and personnel than Operation Graylord.

Each time these 'laws' have been modified or amended in each state, it has occurred to close a loophole where corruption was able to be prosecuted. Each modification has left a trail of evidence demonstrating the clear intent to perpetuate injustice.

Jurisdiction	Initial Adoption
Alabama	5/2/90
Alaska	4/14/93
Arizona	9/7/84
Arkansas	12/16/85
Colorado	5/7/92
Connecticut	6/23/86
Delaware	9/12/85
District of Columbia	3/1/90
Florida	7/17/86
Georgia	6/12/00
Hawaii	12/6/93
Idaho	9/3/86
Illinois	2/8/90
Indiana	11/25/86
Iowa	4/20/05
Kansas	1/29/88
Kentucky	6/12/89
Louisiana	12/18/86
Maine	2/26/09
Maryland	4/15/86
Massachusetts	6/9/97
Michigan	3/11/88
Minnesota	6/13/85
Mississippi	2/18/87
Missouri	8/7/85
Montana	6/6/85
Nebraska	6/8/05
Nevada	1/26/86
New Hampshire	1/16/86
New Jersey	7/12/84
New Mexico	6/26/86
New York	12/16/08
North Carolina	10/7/85
North Dakota	5/6/87
Ohio	8/1/06
Oklahoma	3/10/88
Oregon	1/1/05
Pennsylvania	10/16/87
Rhode Island	11/1/88
South Carolina	1/9/90
South Dakota	12/15/87
Tennessee	8/27/02
Texas	6/20/89
Utah	3/20/87
Vermont	3/9/99
Virginia	1/25/99
Virgin Islands	1/28/91
Washington	7/25/85
West Virginia	6/30/88
Wisconsin	6/10/87
Wyoming	11/7/86

Source: The American Bar Association Center for Professional Responsibility
PDF version