District Attorney Risa Verti Ferman ignores the crimes. No paperwork in her failure to respond to reports/correspondence.
County Detectives verbally indicate they are not permitted to get involved as instructed by the District Attorney.
Judge Carluccio prevented the August 2011 Appeal from review by the Superior Court. Judge Carluccio blocked the Appeal from being transmitted to the Superior Court. Judge Carluccio further prevented production of the transcripts and the court record involving the Court Reporters and the County Prothonotary in the conspiracy. All undocumented but evidenced by the court records.
Judge Carluccio, president of the county bar association which refused any legal respresentation, had built up an immunity to federal investigation/prosecution by working in the US Attorney's office. The US Attorneys Office is not permitted to investigate anyone who worked in their office.
Judge Carluccio's corrupt action further cause the judicial immunity of the prior judges to be void. Carluccio acted to suppress and conceal the multiple frauds upon the court which dated back to the beginning of the divorce matter when an order secretly issued by Judge Rhonda Daniele without jurisdiction was leveraged to subvert every proceeding in the matter. The 'secret' order was found in August 2010 and had been used as leverage to deny custody and visitation, and excuse burglary, computer and telephone surveillance/intrusions/redirection and other crimes.
Judge Page, who acted without jurisdiction during the pending Carluccio appeal, prevented the court record and exhibits from being delivered to the Superior Court. The threat of incarceration for failure to pay the over $ 300,000 CONTEMPT order he improperly issued keeps me unemployed and destitute. Were I to gain employment all wages would be attached to satisfy his absurd order which is defective and void as he lacked jurisdiction during the appeal.
Judge Page acted to prevent the Court Reporters from producing the transcripts. Verbally communicating to the Court Reporters. Documented only by the Court Reporters acting on his ex parte order where Judge Page lacked authority and jurisdiction.
The covert actions of Carluccio and Page to deny, prevent and obstruct the Appeals also cover up the inclusion of the Superior Court judiciary in their crimes. An overt act is a REQUIRED ELEMENT in a conspiracy.
Carluccio and Page do not qualify for judicial immunity because their actions lack jurisdiction - which is documented on the court record. Carluccio and Page knowingly acted without jurisdiction. Their actions were informed and deliberate. They were not acting acting as judges. They were acting as protected co-conspirators.
Judge Gail Weilheimer committed the OVERT ACT when she ordered Healy v. Miller #2013-29976 dismissed.
That OVERT ACT confirms the county's conspiracy to deny my rights not only in my divorce, but in the separate property matter. It causes all of the undocumented failures by county departments, detectives, court admin, and the district attorneys office to become solid and deliberate evidence of the conspiracy against me.
Judge Weilheimer has NOT filed an Opinion in the Appeal of that matter. The Concise Statement of Issues on Appeal has been filed and served in accordance with her order to do so. An Opinion is a requirement for review of the matter by the Superior Court.
Judge Weilheimer has violated the law and procedures failing to address jurisdictional failures. The law mandates she address the void and defective order which was presented in her court. It is not a discretionary issue, it is mandatory. Knowingly enforcing a void and defective court order where the law mandates she address the issue and prove jurisdiction is an act of treason.
A Weilheimer Opinion would not substantiate her decision in the matter as all documents, evidence and exhibits presented in the course of the proceeding demonstrated the void and defective order of Carolyn Carluccio. Opposing counsel never presented any argument to the contrary. Opposing counsel did not comprehend the scope of the matter and additionally was representing Genuine Title Company moreso than the Millers.
The Opinion by Judge Weilheimer would be a self-incriminating OVERT ACT which adversely affects the integrity of the judiciary. The failure to file the opinion is excused by Rule 1.6 - Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct.
| Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional, a nullity. The fore-knowledge of this will not permit it to be used as a defense. The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 was part of the litigation. |
A Superior Court of Pennsylvania mandate, demand or enforcement of the filing of the Opinion is excused by Rule 1.6 - Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct. As the Superior Court has been notified of the lower courts enforcement of a defective and void order, their inaction involves them in the treason of the lower courts action.
| Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional, a nullity. The fore-knowledge of this will not permit it to be used as a defense. The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 was part of the litigation. |
A Supreme Court Mandamus action to mandate, demand or enforce the filing of the Opinion is excused by Rule 1.6 - Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct. The improper actions of the Supreme Court Prothonotary represent deliberate attempts at providing 'plausible deniablity' of the matter for the members of the Court.
| Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional, a nullity. The fore-knowledge of this will not permit it to be used as a defense. The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 was part of the litigation. |
Rule 1.6 - Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct results in the denial of due process rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Rule 1.6 is an improperly and unlawfully enacted 'law' enacted in violation of the Pennsylvania Constitution and the United States Constitution.
There have been over 80 attempts to have the court indicate the multiple jurisdictional failures of Judge Carolyn Carluccio. Nested jurisdictional failures to terrorize the victim of her injustice. All attempts have been ignored in violation of law and procedure.
In the past the judges, 19 of them, have failed to act or ignored the applicable law. Injustice does not end injustice. It extends it. The Weilheimer Appeal is the third pending concurrent appeal\ which causes the crime of the Common Pleas Court to extend to involve the judiciary of the Superior Court of PA.
The determined efforts of the County to deny and prevent the rights of their victim are well documented and have been ongoing since 2007. The County will continue to terrorize and harass and falsely litigate their victim to death. Their is no incentive for the County to cease in their corrupt and terroristic actions against the victim. The corrupted court mandates the participation of the victim/litigant in the furtherance of their coverup.
The County Sheriff, the Pennsylvania Attorney General and the Department of Homeland Security.
The Sheriff is new. The last one, Sheriff Eileen Behr, resigned with the full knowledge of this matter and the conspiracy of the County.
The Corruption in the Montgomery County Courthouse is undeniable and inescapable. There is no escaping when forced to turn to a judicial system mandated to continue the injustice by an unconstitutional 'law' which protects the integrity of the judiciary by sacrificing the integrity of everyone involved in law enforcement.
This conspiracy which involves every attorney and judge in the county is a smaller version of the nationwide conspiracy - evidenced by the CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE OF RULE 1.6 and filed and served upon every state Attorney General and the US Attorney General.
The Pennsylvania Attorney General will now be placed in the situation where of all of the clients which she represents are involved in a case together. Who will she chose to represent?
The Victim? The Public? Herself? The AG Office? The County? County Departments? The Courts? The Judiciary? The Law? The Governor? The Legislature? The Commonwealth?
The UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW Rule 1.6 subverts society, undermines justice, denies liberty and terrorizes victims to the point of suicide.
What does this demonstrate with regard to the Attorney General's actions in the CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE OF RULE 1.6? Which is also stalled by an inappropriate unsubstantiated dismissal which sacrifices the integrity of the federal judiciary. Fifty-five Attorneys General have ignored the matter and failed to act demonstrating by default their deliberate informed admission that Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional.
The Department of Homeland Security must address this nationwide injustice / domestic terroristic threat which undermines the Judicial branch and prevents law enforcement by the Executive branch ansd has been deliberately caused by the American Bar Association at the state and federal levels.
Terance Healy is not the only victim of Rule 1.6 style injustice.
Cash for Kids victimized over 2000 children and their families with Rule 1.6 style injustice.
The Nationwide Foreclosure Crisis victimized millions of people and families with Rule 1.6 style injustice.
Rule 1.6 being enacted into law in every state without constitutional review was a deliberate action of the American Bar Association. The ABA has been involved in the conspiracy to deny justice to every victim. The ABA's membership has profited from their efforts to annihilate the victims through continued litigation before a judiciary mandated to conceal their corruption.
The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 can be refiled as a billion dollar federal lawsuit against the Montgomery County and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. It was not done that way as the primary interest was in restoring constitutional rights for the litigants, and every American. Having multiple versions of the same constitutional litigation going through every federal court in the country would benefit neither the victims/litigants or the country.
We have behaved and acted responsibly, where the judiciary and lawyers have not. Courtesy and respect should not be miscontrued as stupidity and foolishness. The system demands that judges be addressed with undeserved false respect even by the victims they terrorize. "Your honor" may be falling under the influence of the courts illusions.
| Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional, a nullity. The fore-knowledge of this will not permit it to be used as a defense. The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 is a necessity and has been included as part of the litigation. |
No comments:
Post a Comment