CEASE and DESIST

American Bar Association
and ALL Affiliated Organizations
(PDF version)

This CEASE AND DESIST LETTER is to inform the officers of the American Bar Association and affiliated organizations at national, state and local levels, and their membership respectively to IMMEDIATELY STOP all operations and activities.

The organizations efforts which have written and promoted your Model Rules of Professional Conduct to be enacted into law in every state
- has caused a violation of constitutionally protected rights;
- has resulted in preventing law enforcement from actions to address the denial of constitutional rights;
- has undermined the integrity and the judicial independence of the courts at every level within the state courts, the federal district courts and the court of appeals
and has had similar impact hindering the government and ignoring the constitutional rights of Americans in every state.

In undermining the independence of the judiciary, your organization has committed an act of sedition which has been further compounded by manifest disregard for the law and due process. An aggressively enforced conspiracy of silence within your membership prevents exposure, redress and resolution by an affected judiciary which denies rights secured by the Constitution of the United States. The loss of judicial independence, an essential element of justice, compromises the integrity and jurisdiction of the courts.

As your activity which has resulted in the Model Rules of Professional Conduct being enacted into law affects my rights, I have the right to address this issue with your organization. I am currently engaged in efforts to address the indirect unconstitutional effect upon my rights including, but not limited to, contacting state and federal government representatives who may be members of your organization.

Additionally, I will explore legal remedies available to me. These remedies include, but are not limited to, contacting law enforcement to obtain criminal sanctions against you, and suing you civilly for damages which I have experienced. I am not under any circumstances waiving any legal rights I have presently, or future legal remedies against you by sending you this letter.

Sincerely,
Terance Healy
Todd Krautheim

DISTRIBUTION DIRECTLY TO:
American Bar Association
321 North Clark Street
Chicago, IL 60654-7598

American Bar Association
Suite 900
740 15th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005-1022

American Immigration Lawyers Association
Suite 300
1331 G Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005-3142

American Judicature Society
Center Building
2014 Broadway, Suite 100
Nashville, TN 37203

The American Law Institute
4025 Chestnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104

The Association of American Law Schools
1614 20th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009-1001

Association of Life Insurance Counsel
14350 Mundy Drive
Suite 800, #258
Noblesville, IN 46060

Conference of Chief Justices (with copies sent to each Chief Justice)
Association and Conference Services
300 Newport Avenue
Williamsburg, VA 23185-4147

Energy Bar Association
2000 M Street, N.W.,
Suite 715
Washington, D.C. 20036



Federal Bar Association
1220 North Fillmore St.
Suite 444
Arlington, VA 22201

The Federal Circuit Bar Association
1620 I Street, NW
Suite 801
Washington DC 20006

Federal Communications Bar Association
1020 19th Street, NW
Suite 325
Washington, DC 20036-6101

Hispanic National Bar Association
1020 19th Street NW, Suite 505
Washington, D.C. 20036

Judge Advocates Association
In care of: The Army Navy Club
901 17th Street
Washington DC 20006

The Maritime Law Association of the United States
16855 Northchase Dr
Houston, TX 77060

National Asian Pacific American Bar Association
1612 K Street NW, Suite 1400
Washington, DC 20006

National Association of Attorneys General
2030 M STREET NW
8TH FLOOR
WASHINGTON, DC 20036

National Association of Bar Executives
c/o ABA Division for Bar Services
321 N. Clark St., 16th Floor
Chicago, IL 60654

National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
1660 L St. NW
12th Floor
Washington, DC 20036

National Association of Women Judges
1001 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Suite 1138
Washington, D.C. 20036

National Association of Women Lawyers
American Bar Center MS 21.1
321 North Clark Street
Chicago, IL 60654

National Bar Association
1225 11th Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20001

National Conference of Bar Examiners
302 South Bedford Street
Madison, WI 53703-3622

The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws
111 N. Wabash Avenue
Suite 1010
Chicago, Illinois 60602

National Conference of Women’s Bar Associations
PO Box 82366
Portland, OR 97282

National District Attorneys Association
99 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 330
Alexandria, VA 22314

National Legal Aid & Defender Association
1901 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Suite 500
Washington, DC 20006

The National LGBT Bar Association
1301 K Street NW Suite 1100, East Tower
Washington, DC 20005

National Native American Bar Association
PO Box 11145
Tempe, AZ 85284

Alabama State Bar
415 Dexter Avenue
P.O. Box 671
Montgomery, AL 36104

Alaska Bar Association
550 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 1900
Suite 1900
P.O. Box 100279
Anchorage, AK 99510-2079

State Bar of Arizona
Suite 200
4201 N. 24th Street
Phoenix, AZ 85016-6288

Arkansas Bar Association
2224 Cottondale Lane
Little Rock, AR 72202

The State Bar Of California
180 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA 94105

Colorado Bar Association
9th Floor
1900 Grant Street
Denver, CO 80203

Connecticut Bar Association
30 Bank Street
P.O. Box 350
New Britain, CT 06050-0350

Delaware State Bar Association
301 N. Market Street
Wilmington, DE 19801

The District Of Columbia Bar
Suite 200
1101 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005-3908

The Bar Association Of The District Of Columbia
Suite 101
1016 16th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20036

The Florida Bar
P.O. Box 389
651 East Jefferson Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2300

State Bar Of Georgia
Suite 100
104 Marietta Street, NW
Atlanta, GA 30303

Supreme Court of Guam
Second Floor, Guam Judicial Center
120 West O’Brien Drive
Hogatna, Guam 96910

Hawaii State Bar Association
Alakea Corporate Tower
1100 Alakea Street, Suite 1000
Honolulu, HI 96813

Idaho State Bar
P.O. Box 895
525 W. Jefferson Street
Boise, ID 83701

Illinois State Bar Association
Illinois Bar Center
424 S. Second Street
Springfield, IL 62701

Indiana State Bar Association
One Indiana Square, Suite 530
Indianapolis, IN 46204

The Iowa State Bar Association
625 East Court Avenue
Des Moines, IA 50309

Kansas Bar Association
1200 S.W. Harrison Street
P.O. Box 1037
Topeka, KS 66612

Kentucky Bar Association
514 West Main Street
Frankfort, KY 40601-1883

Louisiana State Bar Asssociation
601 St. Charles Avenue
New Orleans, LA 70130-3404

Maine State Bar Association
124 State Street
P.O. Box 788
Augusta, ME 04332-0788

Maryland State Bar Association, Inc.
520 W. Fayette Street
Baltimore, MD 21201

Massachusetts Bar Association
20 West Street
Boston, MA 02111-1218

State Bar Of Michigan
306 Townsend Street
Lansing, MI 48933-2083

Minnesota State Bar Association
Suite 380
600 Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis, MN 55402

The Mississippi Bar
643 N. State Street
P.O. Box 2168
Jackson, MS 39225-2168

The Missouri Bar
326 Monroe Street
P.O. Box 119
Jefferson City, MO 65101

State Bar Of Montana
Suite 2B
7 West Sixth Avenue
P.O. Box 577
Helena, MT 59624

Nebraska State Bar Association
635 S. 14th Street, 2nd Floor
Lincoln, NE 68508

State Bar Of Nevada
600 East Charleston Boulevard
Las Vegas, NV 89104

New Hampshire Bar Association
2 Pillsbury Street, Suite 300
Concord, NH 03301-3502

New Jersey State Bar Association
New Jersey Law Center
One Constitution Square
New Brunswick, NJ 08901-1520

State Bar Of New Mexico
5121 Masthead, NE
P.O. Box 92860
Albuquerque, NM 87109

New York State Bar Association
One Elk Street
Albany, NY 12207

North Carolina State Bar
208 Fayetteville Street Mall
P.O. Box 25908
Raleigh, NC 27611

North Carolina Bar Association
P.O. Box 3688
Cary, NC 27519

State Bar Association Of North Dakota
P.O. Box 2136
Bismarck, ND 58502-2136

Commonwealth Of The Northern Mariana Islands Bar Association
P.O. Box 504539 C.K.
Saipan, MP 96950

Ohio State Bar Association
1700 Lake Shore Drive
P.O. Box 16562
Columbus, OH 43216-6562

Oklahoma Bar Association
1901 N. Lincoln (73105)
P.O. Box 53036
Oklahoma City, OK 73152-3036

Oregon State Bar
16037 S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road
Tigard, OR 97224

Pennsylvania Bar Association
100 South Street
P.O. Box 186
Harrisburg, PA 17108-0186

Puerto Rico Bar Association
Ponce de Leon Avenue
808 Stop II
P.O. Box 9021900
San Juan, PR 00902-1900

Rhode Island Bar Association
115 Cedar Street
Providence, RI 02903

South Carolina Bar
950 Taylor Street
P.O. Box 608
Columbia, SC 29202-0608

State Bar Of South Dakota
222 E. Capitol Avenue #3
Pierre, SD 57501-2596

Tennessee Bar Association
Tennessee Bar Center
221 Fourth Avenue, N., Suite 400
Nashville, TN 37219-2198

State Bar Of Texas
Suite 300
1414 Colorado Street
P.O. Box 12487
Austin, TX 78711-2487

Utah State Bar
645 S. 200 East, #310
Salt Lake City, UT 84111-3834

Vermont Bar Association
35-37 Court Street (05602)
P.O. Box 100
Montpelier, VT 05601-0100

Virgin Islands Bar Association
P.O. Box 4108
Christiansted, Saint Croix, VI USA 00822

Virginia State Bar
Suite 1500
707 E. Main Street
Richmond, VA 23219-2800

The Virginia Bar Association
701 E. Franklin Street. #1120
Richmond, VA 23219

Washington State Bar Association
Suite 600
1325 Fourth Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101-2539

The West Virginia Bar Association
1111 6th Avenue
P.O. Box 2162
Huntington, WV 25701

West Virginia State Bar
2000 Deitrick Boulevard
Charleston, WV 25311

State Bar Of Wisconsin
5302 Eastpark Boulevard
P.O. Box 7158
Madison, WI 53718

Wyoming State Bar
4124 Laramie Street
P.O. Box 109
Cheyenne, WY 82003-0109

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

The following letter was sent to the Justices of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Using the Interbranch Commission on Juvenile Justice Report to demonstrate the failure within the 'system' to take responsibility for the Kids for Cash injustice and the failure to present the cause of the problem - Rule 1.6 Confidentiality.

There have been filings with the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania by which they were aware of our effort though dismissals by unsigned per curiam orders offer plausible deniability to their being informed. As petitions had been filed with the court, it would have been inappropriate to communicate with the judiciary at that time.


One persistent Question lingers...

WHY DID THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA ENACT THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT INTO LAW?

What was the reason which necessitated their action? You may wonder why the supreme court in EVERY state did the same thing at staggered times from 1984 through 2009.

We have asked for a meeting where the issue can be discussed and those essential questions can be answered.

---

August 28, 2014

Chief Justice Ron Castille
Justice Max Baer
Justice Michael J. Eakin
Justice Seamus P. McCaffrey
Justice Thomas G. Saylor
Justice Correale F. Stevens
Justice Debra Todd
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania


Your Honor,

After meetings with Senator Chuck McIlhinney have failed to demonstrate any progress, it is clearly necessary to raise this issue to your attention directly.

The Interbranch Commission on Juvenile Justice was made up of lawyers (9 of 12) who heard information from county judges, district attorneys, public defenders and the Judicial Conduct Board. Attributing the blame to “silence, inaction, inexperience, ignorance, fear of retaliation, greed, ambition, carelessness.”, the lawyers on the commission maintained ‘confidentiality of information’ as required by law – Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

Their realization was correct – “What good would [reporting] it do?” HOWEVER, the Commission’s report neglected to indicate the reason for the silence (Rule 1.6) and it also neglected to expose the cause (the Rule 1.6 mandate) , and as such their recommended reforms do nothing to prevent a recurrence of the judicial corruption.

Rule 1.6 mandates confidentiality of information where it adversely affects the integrity of the judiciary, the reputation of legal professionals, self-incriminates, or negatively affects their client. Protecting the integrity of a judicial which lacks integrity is foolishness. Mandating it has unconstitutional effects.

The Commission Report and Reform Recommendations amount to fraud – a deliberate effort to conceal the root cause of the failure of the justice system to address judicial misconduct, corruption and injustice.

Far more frightening and perilous, is that the lawyers associated with the Commission have now been ‘educated and trained’ in how to execute and conceal crimes such as those committed by Ciavarella and Conahan – who only went to prison because they had failed at money laundering.

The Supreme Court’s authority to enact law is limited to situations where ‘such rules are consistent with this Constitution [Pennsylvania] and neither abridge, enlarge or modify the substantive rights of any litigant.’

The Attorney General is the chief law enforcement officer in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania who must follow the US Constitution, the Pennsylvania Constitution, and the Rules of Professional Conduct which were enacted by the Supreme Court.

For the Attorney General, the Rule 1.6 mandate of ‘confidentiality of information’ with regard to client information undermines ‘everything’ where an attorney general’s clients include (1) the public, (2) the Pennsylvania government, (3) the Office of the Attorney General, (4) government agencies and departments statewide, (5) personnel within those agencies and departments, (6) and themselves.

The Rules of Professional Conduct enacted by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania have substantially affected the ‘jurisdiction’ of the Attorney General preventing and obstructing law enforcement responsibilities when it relates to judicial corruption and injustice within the courts.

The Supreme Court, by the same mandate, has caused a ‘lawful’ requirement within every court and by every lawyer in the commonwealth to ignore injustice and judicial corruption.

Previous Codes of Professional Responsibility (among other titles) have included similar guidelines, BUT once enacted into ‘law’ in 1987 ignoring injustice and judicial corruption ceased being discretionary and was MANDATED BY LAW.

The result, the Rules of Professional Conduct collaterally affect and negate ‘the substantive rights of the litigant’. Specifically, Rule 1.6 Confidentiality causes a mandatory conspiracy of silence within the courts which ignores the damage and harm caused to litigants and further hinders and prevents any resolution.

The substantive rights of the children and families of Luzerne County were clearly ignored.

The Supreme Court lacked authority to enact Rule 1.6 into law as the substantive rights of the People have been ‘abridged’, ‘modified’, denied and ignored.

Additionally, the role of the Sheriff as Chief Law Enforcement Officer in the county has been negated and minimized by judicial decisions. Constitutionally, the Sheriff has the lawful authority and resources to enforce the law within the county.

Failing to act because the judiciary has convinced them of a greatly diminished role, the non-lawyer Sheriffs (reluctantly) defer authority to the county District Attorney who must follow the Rules of Professional Conduct and Rule 1.6. A necessity to prevent prosecution. District Attorneys take no action to investigate and prosecute the injustice and judicial corruption. Related crimes against the victims of injustice are ignored leaving the litigant with no protection under the law.

The American Bar Association’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct were rolled out to the states and enacted into law nationwide without the involvement of the state legislatures, the signature of the governors or any constitutional review.

“What is right is not always the same as what is legal.” was offered by Edward Snowden as an explanation for his actions revealing unconstitutional activity. This statement may also apply to the failure of attorneys general, judges, district attorneys and lawyers to address the unconstitutional actions made ‘legal’ which have undermined justice over the last 25 years.

It is the responsibility of the Governor to represent the People, to preserve, protect and defend the United States Constitution and the state Constitution, and to recognize that collaterally Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional to the People.

The act of sedition which enacted Rule 1.6 and mandated the silent participation of all legal professionals, perverted the judiciary, sacrificed the personal integrity of every judge, and undermined justice can no longer be ignored and excused because of the intimidation and threats of disciplinary action by the corrupt who have deliberately violated the public trust.

The Commission on Juvenile Justice have not done what was requested of them. They have participated in concealing the truth. They have endorsed and enabled continuing injustice.

You, the members of the Legislature and the Judiciary who assembled the Interbranch Commission on Juvenile Justice must review their report findings and recommendations. The deliberate knowledgeable failure of those lawyers to indicate the root cause of the problem in Luzerne County, which also less publicly affects every court in the Commonwealth, was caused by Rule 1.6 - An unconstitutional and repugnant law which has been improperly enacted by the state Supreme Court without proper review of its affect on constitutional rights.

You attention to this matter of statewide importance is appreciated. A meeting to discuss the issue would be greatly appreciated.

Respectfully,

Terance Healy
Todd M. Krautheim


PDF version
Attachment - Letters sent to other government officials

Recognizing Disinformation Techniques

Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth: The Rules of Disinformation. These 25 rules are everywhere in media, politics, television shows, blog articles, and the hateful comments which often prevent discussion of an issue, and of course they are Facebook trolling tactics.

These are the tactics which have been experienced and used to ignore the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6.

Even when the issue is very clear and easily explained, these methods have been used to prevent discussion, interfere with communications, and misinform. I've experienced these tactics. More often than not exposing the disinformation tactic is the best way to counter. BUT, you must always be prepared for combinations of the tactics being used by teams.

When compiled into a list like this along with an issue, examples, facts and truths, the DISINFORMATION techniques are undeniable AND often are coordinated and systemically used by oprganizations.

---

1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don’t discuss it — especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it’s not reported, it didn’t happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.

2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the “How dare you!” gambit.

3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such “arguable rumors”. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a “wild rumor” which can have no basis in fact.

4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent’s argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.

5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviates”, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism reasoning — simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent’s viewpoint.

7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could so taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.

8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough “jargon” and “minutiae” to illustrate you are “one who knows”, and simply say it isn’t so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.

9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.

10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with. Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually them be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues — so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.

11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the “high road” and “confess” with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made — but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, “just isn’t so.” Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later. Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for “coming clean” and “owning up” to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.

12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to loose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.

13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards with an apparent deductive logic in a way that forbears any actual material fact.

14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best for items qualifying for rule 10.

15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place.

16. Vanishing evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won’t have to address the issue.

17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can “argue” with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.

18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can’t do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how “sensitive they are to criticism”.

19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the “play dumb” rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon). In order to completely avoid discussing issues may require you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.

20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.

21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed an unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict (usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim) is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed.

22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.

23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.

24. Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by proper intimidation with blackmail or other threats.

25. Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen.

by H. Michael Sweeney
copyright (c) 1997, 2000 All rights reserved
(Revised April 2000)

Justice Is Coming.

Affirmations help purify our thoughts and restructure the dynamic of our brains so that we truly recognize that nothing is impossible.

I use several affirmations throughout every day in speaking, writing, and Facebook posts -- often when facing the continuing survival through the desperate moments that people are facing.

Less is more powerful.... when there is really nothing you can do or say to change the immediate circumstance, ... when a friends just needs to be acknowledged in a desperate moment.

I keep 'em short and often use them to close a web post, Facebook post or email.

(There are some folks who notice when I haven't used them... and they call it to my attention OR post themselves.)

JUSTICE IS COMING.

I PERSEVERE.

EVERY. PERSON. MATTERS.

PERSEVERE.

Murder by Litigation

The volume of paperwork required to survive the corruption and injustice... to survive, to stay out of prison, to persevere... to not grant them the suicide which they seek.

Non-stop litigation since 2007. Over 20 judges. 3 undecided appeals. Every level of state court. federal district court and court of appeals. The US Congress contacted for intervention.

Direct communication with every law enforcement agency in the government - nationwide, Department of Justice and US Attorney within each and every state. Direct communication with every state representative and senator. Direct communication with every state Attorney General. ( <<< - - All in the last 3 weeks)

Over 30 archive boxes of paperwork. Computers and phones hacked and intercepted. No end in sight. No explanations. No rule of law. No escape.

This is one month of litigation.... Sometimes the Bitstrips are too accurate.

Senator Stewart Greenleaf - Judiciary Committee

It is illegal for the lawyers and judiciary to expose that the judiciary has been undermined, lost their independence and sacrificed their integrity.



Senator Stewart Greenleaf and the Judiciary Committee
They won’t meet on this. (It is illegal for them to do so.)

The lawyers on the Judiciary Committee have caused covered up and perpetuated this national disgrace.

WHAT ARE YOU DOING?

THE PEOPLE WANT THEIR RIGHTS RESTORED.

The lawyers cannot restore what they destroyed.

The United States government existed for over 200 years WITHOUT Rule 1.6 corruption and injustice. It has no necessity and no justification in law, ethics, morality, humanity or justice. Enacted to conceal the corruption of those believed to be uncorruptable because the integrity of the judiciary is beyond reproach. Those without integrity have twisted the judicary and denied the US constitution.

---

Senator Greenleaf's Profile on his web site indicates he has been in the Pennsylvania government since before Rule 1.6 promulgation into law. For over 30 years, Greenleaf has stood by and watched as people's families and lives were destroyed.

He ignored me. For years. I begged and pleaded and cried. HE DID NOTHING. No wonder his Chief of Staff, Pat, is too ashamed to even face me.

I found the problem. HE WON'T MEET. ??? Stewart Greenleaf IS the problem. He is a coward who cannot even face the victims of his corruption.

Contact Senator Greenleaf

On Facebook Senator Stewart J. Greenleaf

Harrisburg Office Senate Box 203012 Harrisburg, PA 17120-3012 (717) 787-6599 800-848-5013 (717) 783-7328 Fax TTY: 800-364-1581	District Office 711 North York Road Suite 1 Willow Grove, PA 19090 (215) 657-7700 800-924-3300 (215) 657-1885 Fax

His listed awards are all self-serving awards from lawyers under duress and compelled to pay homage to the man who perverted the judicial branch and the legislature of the commonwealth for over 30 years.

Recognition of "his efforts and resolve in protecting the rights of Pennsylvanians under civil law" - Something only lawyers could recognize apparently. WHAT A TWISTED BIOGRAPHY OF EGO AND MISDIRECTION.

State Senator Stewart J. Greenleaf (R-Montgomery / Bucks) has represented Pennsylvania’s 12th Senate District since 1978. He was a member of the House of Representatives from 1977 to 1978, serving on the House Labor Relations and Judiciary Committees as well as the Subcommittee on Crime and Corrections. He also served as an Upper Moreland Township Commissioner, as an Assistant District Attorney, Chief of the Appeals Division for the Montgomery County District Attorney’s Office, and as an Assistant Public Defender in Bucks County. He is a member of the Bar Associations of Pennsylvania and Montgomery County. A native of Montgomery County, Senator Greenleaf is a lifelong resident of Upper Moreland Township. He is married to Cecelia “Kelly” Greenleaf. Having graduated from the University of Pennsylvania, he received his law degree from the University of Toledo School of Law. He is Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and is currently a member of the Senate committees on Appropriations, Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure, Education, and Finance. He is also Vice Chair of the Intergovernmental Operations Committee. He is a Senate appointed board member of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority. He has served on the Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing, the Task Force on Death Penalty Litigation in Pennsylvania, and the Statewide Steering Committee on Court Automation. He currently serves as chairman of the Joint State Government Commission’s Task Forces on Real Property Law; Decedents’ Estates Laws; Domestic Relations Law. As a member of the Commission on Judicial Reform, he participated in the development of recommendations to improve the process of judicial selection and was prime sponsor of constitutional amendment legislation to revise the state’s system of judicial discipline. He serves on the State/Federal Assembly of the Law and Justice Committee of the National Conference of State Legislatures and the Criminal Justice Task Force of the American Legislative Exchange Council. He is a board member of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority. He was chairman of the Senate Impeachment Committee during the 1994 impeachment trial of former Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice Rolf Larsen. He is a member of the Pennsylvania Bar Association’s Commission for Justice Initiatives and Task Force on Student Loan Forgiveness and Repayment Assistance. The senator is the author of the Clean Indoor Air Act of 2008, Pennsylvania’s Megan’s Law, the Grandparent Custody Law, the Rails to Trails Act, the School Pesticide Law, the Health Club Consumer Protection Act, the Puppy Lemon Law, the “No Means No” Rape Law, the Amusement Ride Inspection Act, the Missing Children Act, the Divorce Code Reform Act and the Divorce and Custody Mediation Act. He was also prime sponsor of a law that extends the period of legal recourse for abused children, the constitutional amendment allowing for the option of electronic testimony for child victims and witnesses, the law requiring tougher penalties for cruelty to domestic animals, and the law allowing extended sentences when baseball bats are used in violent criminal acts. As chairman of the Judiciary Committee, the senator conducted hearings on the corrections system in Pennsylvania and achieved passage of legislation to reduce overcrowding in state prisons and county jails through intermediate punishment programs. He is also sponsor of state sentencing reform legislation and of a law that provides for addiction treatment for eligible offenders. In 2010, the Senator passed his Criminal Justice Reform Act. He also conducted hearings on the state’s system of probation and parole, resulting in the enactment of public safety reforms in the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and in the Interstate Compact, which deals with interstate parole arrangements. In addition to his interest in criminal justice and judicial issues, Greenleaf has sponsored numerous consumer protection initiatives relating to telemarketing controls, octane level testing, the travel industry and the expansion of the Lemon Law to leased vehicles. The recipient of a number of honors, Greenleaf has been presented the 2005 Leadership Award of the Pennsylvania Coalition Against Rape; the 2002 Montgomery County Bar Foundation Milton O. Moss Award; the 2002 Clean Water Fund Leadership Award; the Pennsylvania Legal Services Ambassador for Justice Award, the Pennsylvania Credit Union League Keystone Award, the Montgomery County Bar Association Outstanding Service Award; the Vince Fitzpatrick Humanitarian Award, the Pennsylvania Legal Services Outstanding Leadership Award; the Fraternal Order of Police Award; the Matty Muir Award from the Victim Services Center of Montgomery County; the Montgomery County Association for Retarded Citizens President’s Award; the Conservation Legislator of the Year Award by the Pennsylvania Wildlife Federation; the National Federation of Independent Business Guardian of Small Business Award and the Humane Society of the United States Mid-Atlantic Region Humanitarian Award. He was selected Man of The Year by the Willow Grove Chamber of Commerce and the Ukrainian Educational and Cultural Center. He was chosen for the Pennsylvania Trial Lawyers Association 1992 Annual Award in recognition of his “efforts and resolve in protecting the rights of Pennsylvanians under civil law.” He has also received the B’nai B’rith Humanitarian Award, the North Penn Korean Association Community Award, the Boy Scouts of America Community Service Award, the Caroline Earle White Award of the Women’s SPCA, the Korean Senior Citizens Service Award, the Deputy Sheriffs Association Distinguished Public Service Award, and the Pennsylvania Legislative Animal Network’s Humane Legislator of the Year Award. Senator Greenleaf has most recently been presented with the William E. Zeiter Award from the Statutory Law Committee of the Pennsylvania Bar Institute for his efforts to update and consolidate Pennsylvania’s statutory law. Also, in 2008, the Senator was awarded a proclamation from the Pennsylvania Veterinary Medical Association and the University of Pennsylvania, School of Veterinary Medicine for the advancement of animal welfare issues, the National Federation of Independent Businesses (NFIB) Guardian of Small Business award, and the Distinguished Alumnus of the Year Award from the University of Toledo College of Law, in recognition of his lifetime of legislative accomplishments.

Invitation

August 26, 2014

Rep. Katherine M. Watson
Rep. Marguerite Quinn
Rep. Todd Stephens
Rep. Tina Davis
Rep. Scott Petri
Rep. John T. Galloway
Rep. Thomas Murt
Rep. Steven J. Santarsiero
Rep. Frank Farry
Rep. Paul Clymer
Rep. Gene DiGirolamo
Rep. Bernie O’Neill
Rep. Kate Harper
Sen. Bob Mensch
Sen. Robert Tomlinson
Sen. Charles McIlhinney
Sen. Stewart Greenleaf
Congressman Mike Fitzpatrick
Senator Bob Casey
Senator Pat Toomey

A package of information regarding the loss of constitutional rights and liberties caused by Rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct has been delivered to your office, by hand, and by fax, with a request to meet to discuss the issue, and ways to address it.

We have been very fortunate to have had the opportunity to meet with members of your staff, or directly when your schedule has permitted. Those meetings have proven to be productive and informative.

As we are all located nearby to each other, we are proposing a meeting with everyone who is available. Please contact our office with 3 possible dates/times when you are available in the coming weeks and if you are interested in hosting the meeting at your office, another location, or our location in Doylestown.

Thank You for your attention to this very important issue.

Terance Healy
Todd Krautheim

---

A law enacted by the state supreme court in every state without proper construction, without constitutional review, without involvement of any state legislature and without the signature of any governor designed to ignore judicial corruption and injustice which includes an aggressively enforced MANDATE of silence for all lawyers while ignoring, denying and preventing the constitutional rights of litigants.

THE CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE OF RULE 1.6

Rule 1.6 affects civil, criminal, family, federal district and federal appeals courts making it impossible to address the loss of constitutional rights when committed by a judge.

The Rules of Professional Conduct – Rule 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION mandates confidentiality of client information where the information
- would affect the integrity of the judiciary,
- would reveal the misconduct of their own office,
- would expose individual liability,
- would adversely affect their client.

The Attorney General of Pennsylvania represents the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Governor, the Attorney General’s office, various branches of the government, their agencies and their officers and the public. All Clients.

This is why Kids for Cash was ignored by the Attorney General, the Luzerne County District Attorney, every lawyer in Luzerne county, the PA Supreme Court and the Judicial Conduct Board.

This is why the ‘Sandusky Report’ released in 2014 failed to indicate any improper conduct. The Report also failed to include a disclaimer that Rule 1.6 Confidentiality mandated the silence of the Attorney General regarding information about the Office of the Attorney General, the Governor, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, etc…

This is why millions of foreclosures were ignored by the Attorneys General nationwide with no prosecutions while millions of people lost their homes based on fraudulent and robosigned deeds and other documents.

Rule 1.6 has undermined law enforcement and the judicial branch in the states and federally.

---

Rule 1.6 is a core part of the American Bar Association’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct. Most, if not all, rules point back to Rule 1.6 by cross reference.

The ABA presented their Model Rules to each state supreme court for promulgation into law. As trade rules, confidentiality was discretionary. As law, the confidentiality became an aggressively enforced mandate which denied people of constitutional rights and prevented anyone in law from acting on behalf of the victims against it’s unconstitutional effect. The victims having no protection of the law become 1) destitute/homeless, 2) incarcerated, or 3) suicidal.

RULE 1.6 CAUSES AN INESCAPABLE LOSS OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
WHICH UNDERMINES THE STATE AND FEDERAL JUDICIARY.

PDF version
Fax'd 8/26/2014 11:25 AM - 1:13 PM

What is this all about anyway...

A law enacted by the state supreme court in every state without proper construction, without constitutional review, without involvement of any state legislature and without the signature of any governor designed to ignore judicial corruption and injustice which includes an aggressively enforced MANDATE of silence for all lawyers while ignoring, denying and preventing the constitutional rights of litigants.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6

Rule 1.6 affects civil, criminal, family, federal district and federal appeals courts making it impossible to address the loss of constitutional rights when committed by a judge.

The Rules of Professional Conduct – Rule 1.6
CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION mandates confidentiality of client information where the information
- would affect the integrity of the judiciary,
- would reveal the misconduct of their own office,
- would expose individual liability,
- would adversely affect their client.

The Attorney General of Pennsylvania represents the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Governor, the Attorney General’s office, various branches of the government, their agencies and their officers and the public. Clients.

This is why Kids for Cash was ignored by the Attorney General, the Luzerne County District Attorney, and every lawyer in Luzerne county.

This is why the Sandusky Report released in 2014 failed to indicate any improper conduct. The Report also failed to include a disclaimer that Rule 1.6 Confidentiality mandated the silence of the Attorney General regarding information about the Office of the Attorney General, the Governor, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, etc...

This is why millions of foreclosures were ignored by the Attorneys General nationwide with no prosecutions while millions of people lost their homes based on fraudulent and robo-signed deeds and other documents.

Rule 1.6 has undermined law enforcement and the judicial branch in the states and federally.

---

Rule 1.6 is a core part of the American Bar Association's Model Rules of Professional Conduct. All rules point back to Rule 1.6 by cross reference.

The ABA presented the Rules to each state supreme court for promulgation into law. The American Bar Association took their trade laws which were discretionary and the supreme courts turned them into lawful mandates. Aggressively enforced mandates which denied people's constitutional rights. BUT, the silence prevented anyone in law from acting on behalf of the victim of the loss of their constitutional rights.

Rule 1.6 causes an inescapable loss of constitutional rights.

Response to US Attorney

August 22, 2104

U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorneys

RE: Your letter dated August 19, 2014 (Attached)

A package was hand delivered to the Philadelphia US Attorney’s office and we asked for a meeting. The attached response is inappropriate, unsigned, on questionable letterhead and completely neglects the issue to be discussed.

The game of making certain there is no way to know to whom we should follow up is tiresome. Why is the United States Attorney playing with people asking for help? And why is the issue no longer the relevant one, but the impossibility of meeting to discuss a federal crime?

Your reply indicates that that the US Attorney “is responsible for the prosecution of persons accused of violating federal laws”. The Constitution of the United States is a federal law. Rights secured by the constitution have been violated, personally and to millions across the nation.

The Pennsylvania Judiciary has violated the Constitution of the United States leaving the courts undermined by a rule enacted by the state supreme court which additionally violates the Pennsylvania Constitution. The same rule undermines the federal courts. The package of letters provided exposed this issue with clear examples.

If your office is also following the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct and as lawyers you are obligated to conceal the crime because it adversely affects the integrity of the judiciary, then indicate that truth and recognize it as the problem to be addressed.

Acknowledge the mandate requiring all lawyers to ignore judicial corruption and injustice, and acknowledge that the judicial branch of state and federal government has been undermined by one rule put forth by the American Bar Association which has undermined the United States Constitution in every court in the country.

The Department of Justice indicates the US Attorney is the appropriate contact.

A meeting is requested to discuss the issue and the criminal actions which have occurred to prevent exposure and resolution of this national issue.

Respectfully,

Terance Healy
Todd Krautheim

( PDF version )

Genuine Title

Your lawyer is bragging about the injustice of the Weilheimer decision. Seriously?

How laughable that a lawyer in a large Philadelphia law firm records his 2014 successes - TWO - and the one entry is based on corruption and fraud with no support in law and an appeal is pending.

Your lawyer wasn't representing the Millers.* The Millers didn't even bother to show up. If the Millers had shown up maybe they could explain that "Weilheimer for Judge" sign on the lawn? Judge Weilheimer couldn't explain it.* Are we supposed to believe that in a local election, people believe so much in a candidate that they do not know and have never met that they seek out and obtain a sign supporting their election?

The lawyer failed to address the essential issue.** The lack of jurisdiction of the order they were seeking to enforce.** No mention of anything which supported jurisdiction in the entire transcript.** Yet the lack of jurisdiction was proven beyond any doubt on the court record... AND COMPLETELY IGNORED BY JUDGE WEILHEIMER.***

In the Appeal, Judge Weilheimer delayed 5 months in issuing her opinion. Justice delayed is justice denied. In her opinion she neglects to offer any support for the jurisdiction of the defective and void order.***

YET, THE LAWYER IS BRAGGING ABOUT THIS 'WIN' ON THE COMPANY WEB SITE. The lawyer who neglected to reveal that his client was Genuine Title Company.**** He never met the Defendants.

Bragging about the deliberate infliction of injustice. A big win - still pending appeal. A pathetic display of arrogance in the face of judicial corruption and injustice. Keeping a man homeless and destitute for a prolonged period while trying to regain his rightful property after enduring constant litigation since 2007.

* Rule 1.6 - Confidentiality of client identity
** Rule 1.6 - Do not adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary
*** Rule 1.6 - Do not self incriminate. Do not adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary.
**** Rule 1.6 - Confidentiality of client identity

Ejectment Action Against Homeowners Dismissed - April 9, 2014




Is this posted on your mother's fridge?

The Illusion of Hope

The illusion of hope I present exists as much for myself as for the others who endure it.

A rare emotional presentation of information.

---

When the GATEKEEPER who answers the phone and becomes TOTALLY CLUELESS and doesn't even know his supervisors name - the walls prevent information from getting to those who can make a change.

Spencer. We have tried for over a month to get in touch with people in your office. Computers and phones are hacked here. Internet is blocked and emails prevented. The Pennsylvania Republicans BLOCK this web site - making it impossible to inform them. So we go to their offices with information. We endure the scheduling issues and the insulting innuendo.

I face the impossibility of contacting those who can make a difference on a daily basis. Do you think maybe people are calling about an issue of importance and deserve an answer? Some respect? I have been doing this since 2007, you are not the first GATEKEEPER.

---

The first GATEKEEPER experience in 2007 had exposed the ridiculous pretend investigation by the DEA while purporting to be the FBI. No one at any FBI office knew Agent "Rose" when I called. After speaking with her for over a month, I left a message on her phone to buy donuts for her office because they did not know who she was. She never called back.

---

Rep Kathy Watson, YES, it took 10 months to get a meeting with you. After repeated contact and visits to your office because the phones are intercepted. I have no cell phone. Most homeless and destitute folks have no phones. The messages were left at my mother's house. So Yes, after being ignored in person and on the phone for months, I again walked into your office. When confronted, your staff strongly indicated it was my fault for not repeatedly contacting them - though I had. ONLY THEN DID WE GET THE MEETING.

You finally met with us and understood the issue.

During that meeting, I had to accept criticism for raising my voice at your staff about their neglecting to contact me. I had to accept criticism about how I was dressed. I am homeless. I have no money in my pocket. You are talking about the expense of replacing your desk. My underwear is ripped. My clothes are clean, but there ARE NOT MANY HOMELESS FOLKS IN BUSINESS SUITS. I was not supposed to live through the experience - and I wish I hadn't. Forgive me for taking things personally but I am experiencing it personally. The interference is personal. The ability to not fall apart completely fails on occasion. Because I am human like that.

There is never enough time to meet to discuss the issues. There is always time to make excuses and criticize the victim who is begging for help. I realize the perception that because I write about what happened, I'm the ungrateful one. EVEN THOUGH, I noticed and appreciated your preparedness and knowledge of the issue.

I receive the disrespect and rudeness from strangers on a daily basis. You cannot imagine what it is like to spend an hour in my existence. I wouldn't wish it on you or anyone.

---

Rep Marguerite Quinn. I am not the enemy. You could have been prepared for the meeting.

You accused me of bashing lawyers. Though I present WHY lawyers are perceived to be corrupt and the law which mandates that participation in corruption.

You suggested I was about to insult your uncle when I began to speak about the Federal case. When I am presenting how this issue affects the integrity of the judiciary by mandating judges to conceal the injustice and corruption of prior judges in the matter. IT IS PROBABLE THAT "UNCLE JUDGE" NEVER EVEN SAW THE MATTER BECAUSE IT WAS INTERFERED WITH BY THE COURT CLERKS - LAWYERS MANDATED TO CONCEAL INJUSTICE.

Your preconceived notions of me were dead wrong. I demonstrated that and didn't shy away from anything you raised about ME. You realized that whatever information you thought you knew was incorrect. POINTS to Archbishop Wood Class of 81. Me too.

Then the game of send information by email begins - when the information is in your hands. Our Computers and phones are hacked. We cannot trust the technology. ( Think about what Snowden reported and put it in the hands of the local bar association and the private investigators who are outside the law. )

Why are the Pennsylvania Republicans blocking the Work2BDone web site? That same information blocking program prevents email from getting through also.

BIG SURPRISE WHEN THE VICTIM IS NOT LASHING BACK POINTLESSLY AND CAN EXPLAIN THE MISTREATMENT EXPERIENCED BY EVERYONE IS CAUSED BY THE VERY ISSUE BEING PRESENTED.

---

Rep Todd Stephens. Clueless and trained stupid. In practice, the judges can destroy people by ignoring the law and the constitution. In law, they cannot. The law we are talking to the lawyer about causes this injustice to be ignored BY MANDATE. AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL MANDATE which requires lawyers to ignore the rights of the litigants.

---

Senator Stewart Greenleaf. You prevent resolution while sitting on the judiciary committee. You are a coward who cannot even face the victim of the injustice you proliferate, endorse and maintain. Your staff are well informed about the experience. They watched as I begged for help. They watched as I found the problem. They watched as I presented numerous examples of the injustice WITHIN THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA. YOU ARE MORE THAN PART OF THE PROBLEM. YOU ARE THE PROBLEM PERSONIFIED.

---

Senator Chuck McIlhinney. What gives? We ask you to bring the issue to the PA legislature in December 2013. We meet. We keep you informed. You stall. You delay. You stop responding. We hand deliver letters. You tried to pawn it off onto Senator Greenleaf instead of working together. He's a lawyer. You are not. He is prevented by law. You are not. You both know the seriousness of the issue. Could the 'Bucks County Machine' really tell you to SHUT UP and stop meeting with those guys. And is that what you've done?

---

Attorney General Kathleen Kane. You've seen first hand in this issue how the staff of the Attorney general's office can undermine justice, the law and a persons constitutional rights. It was done on a public stage with 55 other attorneys general. And still you hide behind a law which has been demonstrated to be unconstitutional and corrupt and affecting millions. You cannot be disciplined for addressing what will be deemed a nullity. It's not a law, it's a nullity.

---

We have provided documentation about the issue to:
every Governor,
every US Senator,
every US Representative,
every Pennsylvania legislator,
every Pennsylvania Sheriff,
every US Attorney,
every judge in Bucks County Pennsylvania,
every judge in Montgomery County Pennsylvania
SILENCE IS CONSENT.

The homeless and destitute victim was able to communicate the issue, file in federal court, repeatedly refile motions in Superior court to address 'pretend' per curiam orders, the paper, postage, copying, the expense of enduring the lawlessness, and of courser they don't have to provide the court records so prepare your appeal without the documents necessary for the appeal.

You are fighting for your rights.

The courts think you are trying to expose their corruption when THEY are providing the evidence of their own corruption. You are just trying to survive it.

---

The lies of the American government agencies are tremendous. DOJ tells us to write to the US Attorney. The US Attorney indicates that they only have jurisdiction where a federal law has been broken. The US Constitution is a federal law - the supreme law of the land.

Doesn't the US Attorney know that? Once you lose your constitutional rights, the refusal to commit suicide is considered spite. The disappointment at your not going 'mad' so they can arrest you is clear. They will make you homeless, destitute and alone... writing stupid letters if you still have an address. You were not supposed to survive and expose the problem. And ONLY a victim would have standing to present it in court - without any lawyer involved. You are not supposed to have survived this long.

No one helps. I AM SO SICK OF SURVIVING.

---

The walls and blockades erected by the lawyers to whom everyone turns for advice. THEY ARE MANDATED TO CONCEAL THE PROBLEM. And I know this. I have experienced this. I excuse them because their twisted unconstitutional law MANDATES they do this to people and to me.

I excuse the govt officials who are prevented from exposing that the judiciary has failed because they may not expose the collapse of the govt. WHILE ALL AROUND US WE SEE THE FALL.

The inhumanity of their actions and how they turn a society at will.

---

Lawyers can create a economy. Have a cop shoot an unarmed kid and the lawyers revenue goes through the roof. Riots, media, govt officials, victims, innocent bystanders, all brought together and needing a lawyer.

The only ones who are getting paid are the lawyers.... and by those who have not got the money to afford it.

---

I persevered thru the nightmare, I found the cause of the issue, not just for me but for millions. I have endured the hatred the misinformation and the redirection. Been denied simple respect from people who were afraid once they heard that the LAWYERS HAVE UNDERMINED THE ENTIRE GOVERNMENT. I exposed HOW they did it. I backed up every statement with well-known examples and evidence.

And still... The injustice continues. I was not supposed to survive. Family friends and everyone are gone. They were exhausted and frightened by the experience.

I sit alone most days. Trying to live. Explaining the corruption of an entire society and a country. A deliberate crime committed by the lawyers, the American Bar Association. They have the ability to block every resolution and prevent exposure by the media.

The reasons to ignore the issue are overwhelming. The ability to present it are quickly undermined by misconceptions, misinformation, or a simple expression. I am accused of everything that THEY are doing to me. I walk in the front doors. I ask for help. I try to summarize the issue. They ask for more information and when they hear it they become more and more frightened by what they are hearing.

No one has ever said I was wrong. Yes, I have thought about most every angle. I have explanations for every scenario. Not because I am a know-it-all... but because I have lived this nightmare.

Accuse me of anger. You're wrong but the reality is that I am supposed to be angry - who wouldn't be angry after going through this experience. That's how they usually have the victim thrown in jail.

There is no happiness in the isolation of the prison of information to which I am confined. And no one gives a damn until they are in the 'next cell' and no one is listening to them either. I understand the suicides.

There's no joy. The illusion of hope I present exists as much for myself as for the others who endure it.

I persevere. JUSTICE IS COMING.

This document has been sent to every Pennsylvania Senator via their web based form. This web site is blocked by the Republicans in the legislature. Though, Democrats can see it. Email to the legislature is blocked and prevented by a similar program. I receive over 11,000 emails per day which prevent me from receiving email - the mailbox is always full. The reason this issue has not seen the light of day is because they have made it impossible to maintain effective communications with anyone. Phones and computers are hacked. You cannot trust the technology.

The Pennsylvania Senate. "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support, obey and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of this Commonwealth and that I will discharge the duties of my office with fidelity." Alloway, Richard L. (R) Argall, David G. (R) Baker, Lisa (R) Blake, John P. (D) Boscola, Lisa M. (D) Brewster, James R. (D) Browne, Patrick M. (R) Brubaker, Mike (R) Corman, Jake (R) Costa, Jay (D) Dinniman, Andrew E. (D) Eichelberger, John H. (R) Erickson, Edwin B. (R) Farnese, Lawrence M. (D) Ferlo, Jim (D) Folmer, Mike (R) Fontana, Wayne D. (D) Gordner, John R. (R) Greenleaf, Stewart J. (R) Hughes, Vincent J. (D) Hutchinson, Scott E. (R) Kasunic, Richard A (D) Kitchen, Shirley M. (D) Leach, Daylin (D) McIlhinney, Charles T. (R) Mensch, Bob (R) Pileggi, Dominic (R) Rafferty, John C. (R) Robbins, Robert D. (R) Scarnati, Joseph B. (R) Schwank, Judith L. (D) Smith, Matt (D) Smucker, Lloyd K. (R) Solobay, Timothy J. (D) Stack, Michael J. (D) Tartaglione, Christine M. (D) Teplitz, Rob (D) Tomlinson, Robert M. (R) Vance, Patricia H. (R) Vogel, Elder A. (R) Vulakovich, Randy (R) Wagner, Scott (R) Ward, Kim L. (R) Washington, LeAnna M. (D) White, Donald C. (R) Wiley, Sean (D) Williams, Anthony H. (D) Wozniak, John N. (D) Yaw, Gene (R) Yudichak, John T. (D)

Remedy of the people when rights are violated

Remedy of the people when rights are violated

THIS CONSTITUTION, and the LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES which SHALL BE made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND; and the JUDGES IN EVERY STATE SHALL BE BOUND THEREBY, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

MISPRISION OF TREASON—USC 18 §2382
Whoever having knowledge of treason, conceals and does not make known the same to some judge, is guilty of treason for contempt against the sovereign, and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

BRIBERY—USC 18 §201
Bribery of any public official directly or indirectly, gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any person to influence any official act.

CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS—USC 18 §241
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS—USC 18 §242
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State the deprivation of any rights, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

CONCEALMENT—USC 18 §2071
Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, documents filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court, shall be fined or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

CLERK IS TO FILE—USC 18 §2076
Whoever, being a clerk, willfully refuses or neglects to make or forward any report, certificate, statement, or document as required by law, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS—USC 42 §1983
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State subjects, or causes to be subjected, any person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall 8be liable to the party injured in an action at law.

CONSPIRACY TO INTERFERE—USC 42 §1985
If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly any persons rights the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages against any one or more of the conspirators.

NEGLECT TO PREVENT—USC 42 §1986
Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done or are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses so to do, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured.

Exerpt from the Grand Jury Hand Book.

Bucks County Senator & Representative Meetings and Visits

This week we traveled around Bucks County stopping to deliver packages of the letters and the newspaper from Scranton/Wilkes-Barre and requesting meetings with Congressmen, State Senators and Representatives regarding the unconstitutionality and the injustice of Rule 1.6.

We appreciate the interest and the support we are receiving from those who have been informed and anticipate further cooperation and effort from those who are only now learning about this national constitutional issue.

US Congressman Mike Fitzpatrick received a copy of the documents and newspaper in his office near Newtown. Then, as luck would have it, we ran into him at the Courthouse in Doylestown to hand deliver a set and quickly discuss the urgency of meeting on the issue. A meeting with the congressmen has not yet been scheduled by his office.

Representative Scott Petri's people had some time to sit with us for a discussion of the issue. A meeting with the representative was requested.

Representative Marguerite Quinn has scheduled a meeting.

Representative John T. Galloway's assistant Brenda sat with us and reviewed the documents left for the representative. A meeting with the representative was requested.

Representative Tina Davis's Chief of Staff met with us and heard an overview of the issue. The package was left with him to review with the representative. A meeting with the representative was requested.

Representative Steven J. Santarsiero's people had some time to review the issue. Chief of Staff Rosemary Wuenschel accepted the paperwork to review with the representative and schedule a meeting to discuss the topic.

Our neighbor in Doylestown, Senator Chuck McIlhinney, was not available to meet. We left updates and documents with his staff and AGAIN requested an opportunity to discuss the silence from the Pennsylvania Senate since December 2013 regarding the issue.

Senator Robert Tomlinson's assistant accepted the paperwork and the request for a meeting on the topic.

Representative Frank Farry's office manager sat down for a very good meeting and discussion of the topic. After reviewing the documents and newspaper articles, a meeting with the representative was requested.

Representative Kathy Watson had obviously reviewed the documentation delivered prior to our meeting. A very productive discussion and explanation and review of the issue ended with a request for the PA Legislature to be formally informed of the issue. Representative Watson understood and recognized the problem we were reporting and attempting to address. We anticipate her involvement in the resolution of the matter for the sake of the Commonwealth and the country.

Representative Clymer's office was not open when we visited.

Senator Bob Mensch's office is on our list for Montgomery County visits.

Senator Stewart Greenleaf's office refuses to schedule a meeting on the issue. As head of the Judiciary Committee this is NOT ACCEPTABLE. We will continue to pursue the involvement of Senator Greenleaf while questioning his deliberate, intentional and well informed avoidance of the issue. His silence demonstrates complicity.

Representative Todd Stephens was caught in his office and denied meeting with Healy before in 2011 about the corruption in Montgomery County. That was when Healy v Healy had only involved 16 judges. Now it's at 20 with two appeals in Superior Court pending. Rep. Stephens has been trained to believe that judges may deny people's rights which are protected by the US Constitution. TODD STEPHENS IS WRONG. After that foolishness was addressed, the impromptu meeting ended abruptly. A meeting with the representative was requested to further discuss the issue.

While we were out enjoying the back roads of beautiful Bucks County, the fax was sending copies to EVERY Pennsylvania State Representative. Confirmations received.

The government of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has been notified of the issue.

The Impact of Retellings

We are meeting with local politicians and presenting the issue of Rule 1.6 undermining the American Judicial system. To accomplish this requires the repetition of the experience, the facts, the results - homelessness, incarceration and suicides.

It requires me to do something I have tried avoiding. The retelling of my experience causes me to relive the stress and emotion. The purpose of the web site was so that i did not have to explain the details to people who wanted to know more - or who couldn't imagine surviving the truth of the story.

A person who has lost their rights can best be identified by the following statement:

I am a sane man dealing with an absolutely insane situation. Every person in a position to help has acted improperly in direct violation of procedures and the law preventing the resolution of any matter… they each make the situation worse… NO ONE HELPED…

NO ONE COULD HELP… until the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6

The message is getting out... Those we have spoken to have been emotionally moved. Those who refuse to meet and discuss the problem can be categorized and described in one word - LAWYERS.

The lawyers know what has happened. The law prevents them from any action to resolve the situation UNTIL THEY RECOGNIZE THAT IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND STAND UP LIKE AN AMERICAN AND FACE THE MESS THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION HAS CREATED.

The non-lawyers need to rescue the US before the divisive tactics of those who seek the country's destruction succeed.

We are Americans. We don't allow injustice to persist. We can fix the mess created and resolve the damage done to millions of Americans stripped of their Constitutional Rights.

Through countless retellings, I persevere. JUSTICE IS COMING.

Listen - The Silence of the News Media

The following media outlets have received all of the letters to state and federal law enforcement and government.

Reports of Another Family Court Suicide

Will the Family Courts ever stop their destruction of lives and families?

Robin Williams, post-divorce, back in rehab in Minnesota - posted in High Asset Divorce on Friday, July 11, 2014. Robin Williams was divorced in 2009, after he and his wife filed for divorce the year before, and he has said that he believes it was because of his drinking problems. He did note that he could tell his wife that he was sorry, but he said that that just was not always enough to get rid of the issues. The official reason for the divorce has been listed as irreconcilable differences. The actor did give up both drugs and alcohol at some point in the 1980s. However, he has not been been completely off them since then. Most notably, he began to drink again back in 2003. He was in Alaska, doing a movie, and he started drinking because he felt lonely. He then went to a rehab center in Oregon in 2006. The actor's long battle appears to be continuing, as recent reports indicate that he is at the Hazeldon Addiction Treatment Center, which is close to Lindstrom, Minnesota. However, the program that he is doing seems to be one that is aimed at helping people refocus before they relapse, so he may not have started using alcohol again. A photo recently surfaced of the actor at a Dairy Queen near the treatment center, which was taken with a female employee of the shop.

Statement by President Obama on the Passing of Robin Williams Robin Williams was an airman, a doctor, a genie, a nanny, a president, a professor, a bangarang Peter Pan, and everything in between. But he was one of a kind. He arrived in our lives as an alien – but he ended up touching every element of the human spirit. He made us laugh. He made us cry. He gave his immeasurable talent freely and generously to those who needed it most – from our troops stationed abroad to the marginalized on our own streets. The Obama family offers our condolences to Robin’s family, his friends, and everyone who found their voice and their verse thanks to Robin Williams.

Meeting with Congressman Fitzpatrick

A chance encounter with Congressman Mike Fitzpatrick outside the Courthouse in Doylestown today gave Todd an opportunity to explain the Rule 1.6 issue and pass along the letters which have been sent to all levels of state and federal government nationally.

The letters had been hand delivered to his Newtown office last week.

A meeting will be arranged this week to have a full discussion of the topic.

PDF of the Letters delivered to Rep. Fitzpatrick.

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION/REVIEW OF PER CURIAM ACTION

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia Office

Terance Healy	: NO: 900 EDA 2014
	:
V.	:
	:
David R. Miller	:
Jennifer K. Miller	:
	:

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION/REVIEW OF PER CURIAM ACTION


Regarding the Per Curiam Order attached.

The caption is INCORRECT.

The decision is UNEXPLAINED.

The per curiam order is UNSIGNED.

The per curiam order is UNDATED.

The motion was UNCONTESTED.

Please identify the judge, the motions panel, and/or the member(s) of the Central Legal Staff involved in the careless preparation of the document.

Attached are copies of the following Superior Court Of Pennsylvania which demonstrate the previous decisions of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania with regard to procedurally defective orders where the court lacked jurisdiction.

J-A01019-14	Kozel v. Kozel	#461 WDA 2013
J-A27027-13	Wagner v. Wagner	#235 MDA 2013
J-S17007-13	Hauck v. Hauck	#1984 WDA 2011
J-A02029-13	Reece v. Reece	#987 WDA 2012
J-S21041/08	Danz v. Danz	#1506 WDA 2007
J-A14035/09	Bingaman v Bingaman	#1644 MDA 2008
J-A30006/02	Lazaric v. Lazaric	#263 EDA 2002

The evidence is clear. The law is clear. The precedents are well established.

Every action of the courts demonstrate the efforts to obstruct, misinform and misdirect somehow made ‘lawful’ by Rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct causing the denial of life and liberty and terrorizing every aspect of life.

Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio issued a deliberately defective and void order. The court record indicates that she clearly lacked jurisdiction. The court record demonstrates the obstruction of the appeal filed on August 15, 2011.

There is no escape for the litigant. The court is mandated to terrorize and destroy the litigant ‘to protect the integrity of the courts.’ pursuant to Rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

A deliberate, intentional and malicious court order issued by Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio without jurisdiction has terrorized the litigant from the day it was issued. An action done without jurisdiction to conceal the actions of fifteen prior judges in the matter which have attacked their victim since 2007.

The County & Court then went to work to obstruct and deny the appeal of that order issuing further void orders based on the defective and void orders. Those who enforced the defective and void orders becoming involved in criminal acts for doing so. The mandate for protecting integrity of those without integrity growing exponentially.

The Court personnel and all lawyers are mandated to obstruct and deny the victim ‘to protect the integrity of the court’. In doing so, they become involved in the obstruction of justice.

Each court believing the litigant is causing their involvement in this crime. Not the ‘judge’ acting without jurisdiction… not the Courts which mandated their participation in the denial of justice. Each ignoring the law and the US Constitution in the process of self-preservation and sacrifice of their own judicial integrity.

The Appellant is being denied Life, Liberty and equal protection under the law. He is experiencing the complete loss of rights and privileges protected by the Constitution of the United States, and the Pennsylvania Constitution.

The inability to accomplish anything with regard to the Appeal is caused by the courts, enabled by the court, endorsed by the courts, made ‘lawful’ by the courts as everyone involved in the denial of constitutionally protected rights is mandated to conceal the corruption, injustice and lack of jurisdiction of the court.

The victim can do nothing to escape the game of “The order is not void until we say it’s void’. There have been over 80 attempts to have the court take the lawful action to void the order. Every attempt has been ignored.

The Superior Courts are mandated to obstruct and deny the victim ‘to protect the integrity of the court’. In doing so they became involved in the obstruction of justice. Their knowledge of the void and defective orders mandated that they address the issue. A mandatory action, not a discretionary issue for the court.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court is mandated to do the same. The Supreme Court enacted the law and in doing so must follow it. This prevents the Supreme Court from repealing the law or addressing the injustice.

And so it goes, that every effort to prevent any interaction with the judiciary is the primary focus. It is essential to ‘protect the integrity of the judiciary’. The denial of justice to the litigant is a consequence. The continued peril and jeopardy of the victim is not a concern.

The chaos injected by the letter dated August 8, 2014 and the improperly captioned, unexplained, unsigned, undated decision to the uncontested motion.

The Montgomery County Court has neglected to provide the full court record to the Superior Court and has obstructed efforts to produce the documents and transcripts to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

This Court has been notified of the litigation in the Federal Courts which is now before the United States Congress and the President to provide the only escape from the nightmare created when the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, and EVERY state supreme court, enacted the Rules of Professional Conduct into law without ANY constitutional review, construction by a legislature or signature of any governor. Copies of notices attached.

I respectfully request review of this matter based on the fact that Rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct results in the absolute denial of right and liberties protected by the United States Constitution and that the supporting staff of this Court cease from unexplained and unsubstantiated actions to obstruct, prevent and deny justice in this matter.

AN ORAL ARGUMENT ON THIS MOTION IS DEMANDED

Respectfully,



Terance Healy


NB: The game of the Prothonotary deliberately improperly captioning the matter is obvious and tiresome. Please correct all records and documents accordingly.

The matter has left the appellant homeless and destitute and forced to respond to the Courts.

The appellant has no choice but to persist as he is not capable of suicide.

J-A01019-14 Kozel v. Kozel #461 WDA 2013

J-A27027-13 Wagner v. Wagner #235 MDA 2013

J-S17007-13 Hauck v. Hauck #1984 WDA 2011

J-A02029-13 Reece v. Reece #987 WDA 2012

J-S21041/08 Danz v. Danz #1506 WDA 2007

J-A14035/09 Bingaman v Bingaman #1644 MDA 2008

J-A30006/02 Lazaric v. Lazaric #263 EDA 2002


Letter to United States Attorneys August 8, 2014

Letter to President Barack Obama July 28, 2014

Letter to US Senators Patrick Toomey and Robert Casey July 28, 2014

Letter to the Senators of the 113th Congress July 28, 2014

Letter to US Senate Committee on the Judiciary July 30, 2014

Letter to Sheriffs of Pennsylvania July, 31, 2014

Letter to Pennsylvania Senate Judiciary Committee July 31, 2014

Letter to United States House of Representatives July 30, 2014

Letter to US House Committee on the Judiciary July 30, 2014

Letter to Governor of EVERY state July 28, 2014

Letter to Governor Tom Corbett August 2, 2014

Letter to EVERY Pennsylvania Senator August 2, 2014

Letter to the Pennsylvania Legislature – Representatives August 2, 2014

Letter to Governor Tom Corbett, the Sheriffs of Pennsylvania, The Pennsylvania Legislature, the Attorney General of Pennsylvania August 3, 2014

Wilkes-Barre Scranton Independent Gazette

YES, AMERICA, WE ARE IN A CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS

Rule 1.6 has NOT been Misinterpreted or Misunderstood

The Constitutional Challenge posed by us, Todd Krautheim and Terance Healey, is NOT misinterpreting or misunderstanding Rule 1.6 of the American Bar Association’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct, the association’s most important confidentiality rule.

These are the dismissive suggestions of lawyers with regard to the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6. It is what they tell people who ask them about it. They offer no further information to back up their statement. They further indicate that we will never succeed (and neglect to explain why we won’t).

These lawyers are WRONG.   .   .   . READ MORE

Letter to United States Attorneys

August 8, 2014

The United States Attorneys

It has been one year since the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 was filed to address the Constitutional Crisis in the United States.

A law enacted without proper construction, without constitutional review, without involvement of any state legislature and without the signature of any governor designed to ignore judicial corruption and injustice which includes an aggressively enforced MANDATE of silence for all lawyers.

Filed and served upon every state Attorney General yet the federal courts undermined the preemptive challenge, concealed the matter from fifty six state attorneys general and improperly dismissed the matter without substantiation while ignoring the relevant doctrine. The actions by the court confirmed the deliberate intent and purpose of the law and it’s denial of constitutional rights without regard for the injustice served upon the people of the United States..

Enclosed are letters to the President, the US Congress, the Governors of the United states, et al.

Please review and respond. This issue will not go away on it’s own.

The Constitutional rights of the American People are being denied by the courts and held hostage by a mandate of confidentiality for all attorneys in state and federal courts which has effectively undermined the United States Government.

Your attention to this matter is anticipated and expected. Please contact us to arrange a meeting.

Respectfully,

Terance Healy
Todd M. Krautheim

PDF Version with ALL attachments

One Year Later... The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6

A successful person is one who can lay a firm foundation with the bricks others have thrown at them.

Breadcrumbs ... The Rules of Professional Conduct

Each time there has been a prosecution or the public has been made aware of judicial corruption, misconduct and injustice, the state Supreme Courts modify Rule 1.6 and the Rules of Professional Conduct to close the loophole. This leaves a trail of 'breadcrumbs' which demonstrates the true purpose for enacting the 'rules' into law without constitutional review, legislative oversight or a governors signature.

Where in the Constitution does it permit the Judiciary to enact trade rules for any profession. Just because lawyers conduct 'some' work in courts, WHY DO THE JUDICIARY BELIEVE THEY CAN MAKE THE LAW FOR THE ENTIRE LEGAL PROFESSION and allow those rules to deny constitutional rights.

There are toilets in the courthouses, does that place the plumbing code under the purview of the state supreme court? I don't think so.

WHO PERMITTED THE JUDICIARY TO DENY PEOPLE's RIGHTS IN ANY PROCESS? That's not in any constitution that I have read.

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality has caused the Constitutional Crisis in America.

Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional.

As such, the state supreme courts had no authority to enact law.

Why did the American Bar Association put them up to it? Why have the state and federal Courts neglected and ignored the Constitutional rights of EVERY AMERICAN simply because they made a HUGE mistake and refuse to own up to it?

Nationwide Foreclosures based on fraudulent documents.
Kids for Cash in Luzerne County PA.
Incarceration of the Innocent to fill private prisons.
Widespead injustice causing families to be destitute, homeless and suicidal.